FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Acid attacks

Jump to newest
 

By *lem-H-Fandango OP   Man
over a year ago

salisbury

Should the sales of strong acid be even tighter controlled? Or should the sentances for offenders be much much longer. 10 years just for possession for example. Should be easy to work out who's on a moped with a small bottle of acid in their inside pocket, vs someone on their way back from BandQ with an unopened box of drain cleaner. Why make life difficult for the many just because some kid is a delinquent?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Should the sales of strong acid be even tighter controlled? Or should the sentances for offenders be much much longer. 10 years just for possession for example. Should be easy to work out who's on a moped with a small bottle of acid in their inside pocket, vs someone on their way back from BandQ with an unopened box of drain cleaner. Why make life difficult for the many just because some kid is a delinquent?"

Both; sale should be restricted and sentences should be much longer

- Mrs. J -

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Are we just going to ignore the demographics p_edominantly carrying out the attacks for the sake of being politically correct?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I cant even believe this happens. What kind of person throws acid at another person.

(Obviously i know this does happen. I just can't comprehend it!)

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lem-H-Fandango OP   Man
over a year ago

salisbury


"Should the sales of strong acid be even tighter controlled? Or should the sentances for offenders be much much longer. 10 years just for possession for example. Should be easy to work out who's on a moped with a small bottle of acid in their inside pocket, vs someone on their way back from BandQ with an unopened box of drain cleaner. Why make life difficult for the many just because some kid is a delinquent?

Both; sale should be restricted and sentences should be much longer

- Mrs. J -"

Seems ridiculous you can buy sulphuric acid on ebay! I agree.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lem-H-Fandango OP   Man
over a year ago

salisbury


"Are we just going to ignore the demographics p_edominantly carrying out the attacks for the sake of being politically correct?"

I didn't know there was one? Obviously with the Asian "honour" acid attacks that's part of their culture. Society probably shouldn't interfere. But is there a demographic on mopeds?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

This needs to be knocked on the head asap or else it become the new weapon of choice for many yobs.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *htcMan
over a year ago

MK

should be given the same fate back, minus medical treatment for 48hours. then locked up in prison, double the sentence. would soon stop this

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lem-H-Fandango OP   Man
over a year ago

salisbury


"This needs to be knocked on the head asap or else it become the new weapon of choice for many yobs.

"

True, someone needs a 40 year sentance.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Couple years ago I got asked for ID for a set of cutlery out of asda. Surely corrosive substances are being sought elsewhere. Work, school etc

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Are we just going to ignore the demographics p_edominantly carrying out the attacks for the sake of being politically correct?"

I did not know there were any demographics. Last night there were five acid attacks in London

- Mrs. J -

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

My grandson had some thrown at him on his way home one evening. Most of it missed fortunately. It's the weapon of the day and can be used from feet away, instead of close up, like a knife; which he's also been attacked with, as well as a baseball bat.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondsmiles.Woman
over a year ago

little house on the praire

It makes me feel sick. What goes through peoples minds to make them want to permantly want to deform people

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"My grandson had some thrown at him on his way home one evening. Most of it missed fortunately. It's the weapon of the day and can be used from feet away, instead of close up, like a knife; which he's also been attacked with, as well as a baseball bat. "

You thought of moving to a white neighbourhood? Or are the three aerious assaults on your grandson a small price to pay for being "diverse" and "inclusive"?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Should the sales of strong acid be even tighter controlled? Or should the sentances for offenders be much much longer. 10 years just for possession for example. Should be easy to work out who's on a moped with a small bottle of acid in their inside pocket, vs someone on their way back from BandQ with an unopened box of drain cleaner. Why make life difficult for the many just because some kid is a delinquent?"

Both. The people who do this are pure evil, and if tighter restrictions and tougher sentences put a stop to acid attacks then it's worth the inconvenience to folk who make genuine purchases.

I worked with a lady whose neck, shoulders and chest were horrendously scar_ed from an acid attack, and the physical and mental pain she suffe_ed as a result was awful. Her life was destroyed

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"This needs to be knocked on the head asap or else it become the new weapon of choice for many yobs.

"

Completely this. I can't even comprehend that someone would do this to another.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"My grandson had some thrown at him on his way home one evening. Most of it missed fortunately. It's the weapon of the day and can be used from feet away, instead of close up, like a knife; which he's also been attacked with, as well as a baseball bat.

You thought of moving to a white neighbourhood? Or are the three aerious assaults on your grandson a small price to pay for being "diverse" and "inclusive"?"

That a serious question??

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"My grandson had some thrown at him on his way home one evening. Most of it missed fortunately. It's the weapon of the day and can be used from feet away, instead of close up, like a knife; which he's also been attacked with, as well as a baseball bat.

You thought of moving to a white neighbourhood? Or are the three aerious assaults on your grandson a small price to pay for being "diverse" and "inclusive"?"

You do realise this is also happening in white neighbourhood's, right!?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"My grandson had some thrown at him on his way home one evening. Most of it missed fortunately. It's the weapon of the day and can be used from feet away, instead of close up, like a knife; which he's also been attacked with, as well as a baseball bat.

You thought of moving to a white neighbourhood? Or are the three aerious assaults on your grandson a small price to pay for being "diverse" and "inclusive"?

That a serious question??"

Shit, silly racist me forgot acid, baseball bat and knife attacks are just as common in Richmond and Primrose Hill as they are in Barking and Mile End. Apologies.

Ffs.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

well according to May, cannabis is far more dangerous. Tobacco, transfats, GMOs and alcohol and sulphuric acid are fine though... gotcha

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"My grandson had some thrown at him on his way home one evening. Most of it missed fortunately. It's the weapon of the day and can be used from feet away, instead of close up, like a knife; which he's also been attacked with, as well as a baseball bat.

You thought of moving to

a white neighbourhood? Or are the three aerious assaults on your grandson a small price to pay for being "diverse" and "inclusive"?

That a serious question??

Shit, silly racist me forgot acid, baseball bat and knife attacks are just as common in Richmond and Primrose Hill as they are in Barking and Mile End. Apologies.

Ffs. "

Have you branched out of London or are you just stuck reading the BBC indoors.

Happens all over the place. Don't be silly lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"My grandson had some thrown at him on his way home one evening. Most of it missed fortunately. It's the weapon of the day and can be used from feet away, instead of close up, like a knife; which he's also been attacked with, as well as a baseball bat.

You thought of moving to a white neighbourhood? Or are the three aerious assaults on your grandson a small price to pay for being "diverse" and "inclusive"?

That a serious question??

Shit, silly racist me forgot acid, baseball bat and knife attacks are just as common in Richmond and Primrose Hill as they are in Barking and Mile End. Apologies.

Ffs. "

So the point you're making is that if racially driven attacks are happening then you're advising the whites to get out and get to safety in a white area? Not, that perhaps we should stand up against racism?

Mmm. Part of the problem methinks.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"My grandson had some thrown at him on his way home one evening. Most of it missed fortunately. It's the weapon of the day and can be used from feet away, instead of close up, like a knife; which he's also been attacked with, as well as a baseball bat.

You thought of moving to

a white neighbourhood? Or are the three aerious assaults on your grandson a small price to pay for being "diverse" and "inclusive"?

That a serious question??

Shit, silly racist me forgot acid, baseball bat and knife attacks are just as common in Richmond and Primrose Hill as they are in Barking and Mile End. Apologies.

Ffs.

Have you branched out of London or are you just stuck reading the BBC indoors.

Happens all over the place. Don't be silly lol"

'Course it does, old chap... and in similar numbers too, right?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Acid is just one of many weapons.

The problem is police have been told not to tackle moped crime because if they fall off while the police chase them or if a pedestrian is hit the police can be sued.

This is why motorbike crime is up more than 600% this year.

Anything can be used as an improvised weapon so do we ban private property and make every item have a licence to purchase?

The acid attacks are just one small escalation to the motor bike chrome problem and it won't be solved until the police start tackling it or vigilantes get involved.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ANDA2Couple
over a year ago

Henley Arden


"My grandson had some thrown at him on his way home one evening. Most of it missed fortunately. It's the weapon of the day and can be used from feet away, instead of close up, like a knife; which he's also been attacked with, as well as a baseball bat.

You thought of moving to a white neighbourhood? Or are the three aerious assaults on your grandson a small price to pay for being "diverse" and "inclusive"?"

WTF dude this is not some Alt right website.

Assault of any type is not restricted to creed, colour, class or location. It's about violence and assault.

Have been stabbed and burgled. Guess what they were white in a p_edominantly white area.

And yes a licence should be needed to buy acid.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

WTF dude this is not some Alt right website.

Assault of any type is not restricted to creed, colour, class or location. It's about violence and assault.

Have been stabbed and burgled. Guess what they were white in a p_edominantly white area.

And yes a licence should be needed to buy acid.

"

It really is a simple as googling where the majority of these attacks happen and then googling the population demographics of said area. I know facts and truth are deeply offensive and it's your right to be offended, but denying it to be true just makes you look at best, in denial, at worst, thick.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"My grandson had some thrown at him on his way home one evening. Most of it missed fortunately. It's the weapon of the day and can be used from feet away, instead of close up, like a knife; which he's also been attacked with, as well as a baseball bat.

You thought of moving to

a white neighbourhood? Or are the three aerious assaults on your grandson a small price to pay for being "diverse" and "inclusive"?

That a serious question??

Shit, silly racist me forgot acid, baseball bat and knife attacks are just as common in Richmond and Primrose Hill as they are in Barking and Mile End. Apologies.

Ffs.

Have you branched out of London or are you just stuck reading the BBC indoors.

Happens all over the place. Don't be silly lol

'Course it does, old chap... and in similar numbers too, right? "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ANDA2Couple
over a year ago

Henley Arden


"Acid is just one of many weapons.

The problem is police have been told not to tackle moped crime because if they fall off while the police chase them or if a pedestrian is hit the police can be sued.

This is why motorbike crime is up more than 600% this year.

Anything can be used as an improvised weapon so do we ban private property and make every item have a licence to purchase?

The acid attacks are just one small escalation to the motor bike chrome problem and it won't be solved until the police start tackling it or vigilantes get involved.

"

No it's because the Police don't have suitable vehicles to chase them with.

Samething happened with push bikes Hence why the Police started bike patrols. The MET are setting up anti moped patrols with suitable vehicles.

Unfortunately the Police have to react to the threat so they are in a catch-up situation.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"My grandson had some thrown at him on his way home one evening. Most of it missed fortunately. It's the weapon of the day and can be used from feet away, instead of close up, like a knife; which he's also been attacked with, as well as a baseball bat.

You thought of moving to a white neighbourhood? Or are the three aerious assaults on your grandson a small price to pay for being "diverse" and "inclusive"?

That a serious question??

Shit, silly racist me forgot acid, baseball bat and knife attacks are just as common in Richmond and Primrose Hill as they are in Barking and Mile End. Apologies.

Ffs.

So the point you're making is that if racially driven attacks are happening then you're advising the whites to get out and get to safety in a white area? Not, that perhaps we should stand up against racism?

Mmm. Part of the problem methinks. "

I note you're not responding to my post....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uckOfTheBayMan
over a year ago

Mold


"This needs to be knocked on the head asap or else it become the new weapon of choice for many yobs.

"

It already is

Purely for the reason that punishment is less than knife carrying

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *isscheekychopsWoman
over a year ago

The land of grey peas and bacon


"My grandson had some thrown at him on his way home one evening. Most of it missed fortunately. It's the weapon of the day and can be used from feet away, instead of close up, like a knife; which he's also been attacked with, as well as a baseball bat.

You thought of moving to a white neighbourhood? Or are the three aerious assaults on your grandson a small price to pay for being "diverse" and "inclusive"?

That a serious question??

Shit, silly racist me forgot acid, baseball bat and knife attacks are just as common in Richmond and Primrose Hill as they are in Barking and Mile End. Apologies.

Ffs.

So the point you're making is that if racially driven attacks are happening then you're advising the whites to get out and get to safety in a white area? Not, that perhaps we should stand up against racism?

Mmm. Part of the problem methinks.

I note you're not responding to my post...."

He probably doesn't have an intelligent response

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

You realize car batteries contain acid I suspect, so do you need a licence to buy a battery under your rule? Why not call for teenagers to be locked up from age 12 to 21 just to be certain.

Some publicity about the damage acid can do with appropriate sentences for those caught is all that is needed. A shoot to kill arrest policy may also help.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"My grandson had some thrown at him on his way home one evening. Most of it missed fortunately. It's the weapon of the day and can be used from feet away, instead of close up, like a knife; which he's also been attacked with, as well as a baseball bat.

You thought of moving to a white neighbourhood? Or are the three aerious assaults on your grandson a small price to pay for being "diverse" and "inclusive"?

That a serious question??

Shit, silly racist me forgot acid, baseball bat and knife attacks are just as common in Richmond and Primrose Hill as they are in Barking and Mile End. Apologies.

Ffs.

So the point you're making is that if racially driven attacks are happening then you're advising the whites to get out and get to safety in a white area? Not, that perhaps we should stand up against racism?

Mmm. Part of the problem methinks.

I note you're not responding to my post...."

I didn't say that were "racially driven", just stated the indisputable fact that they happen disproportionately in Asian/Black neighbourhoods, therefore living in one of these said neighbourhoods (I.e Barking, where the lady I was talking to lives) you are far more likely to be a victim. I never said it was Brown on White racism, most of these attacks are Asian on Asian or Black on Black, but obviously you're more likely to be caught up in it if you live in an area where it's happening a lot.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

An app could be developed by the police that allows people to report crime to the police and that could broadcast any crime to people within the local area.

The more eye witnesses and the sooner people know a crime is happening the more likely they criminals are caught.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ANDA2Couple
over a year ago

Henley Arden


"You realize car batteries contain acid I suspect, so do you need a licence to buy a battery under your rule? Why not call for teenagers to be locked up from age 12 to 21 just to be certain.

Some publicity about the damage acid can do with appropriate sentences for those caught is all that is needed. A shoot to kill arrest policy may also help. "

Yes actually I would approve of car battery car being licensed. Most modern car batteries are sealed units anyway so you don't have to top them up.

It's not just teenagers using acid that's the issue.

Unfortunately a few wrong en have screwed it up for the rest of us. But that's life.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"My grandson had some thrown at him on his way home one evening. Most of it missed fortunately. It's the weapon of the day and can be used from feet away, instead of close up, like a knife; which he's also been attacked with, as well as a baseball bat.

You thought of moving to a white neighbourhood? Or are the three aerious assaults on your grandson a small price to pay for being "diverse" and "inclusive"?

That a serious question??

Shit, silly racist me forgot acid, baseball bat and knife attacks are just as common in Richmond and Primrose Hill as they are in Barking and Mile End. Apologies.

Ffs.

So the point you're making is that if racially driven attacks are happening then you're advising the whites to get out and get to safety in a white area? Not, that perhaps we should stand up against racism?

Mmm. Part of the problem methinks.

I note you're not responding to my post....

I didn't say that were "racially driven", just stated the indisputable fact that they happen disproportionately in Asian/Black neighbourhoods, therefore living in one of these said neighbourhoods (I.e Barking, where the lady I was talking to lives) you are far more likely to be a victim. I never said it was Brown on White racism, most of these attacks are Asian on Asian or Black on Black, but obviously you're more likely to be caught up in it if you live in an area where it's happening a lot."

Okay, I was trying to unpick what you were saying as it wasn't clear.

So you're saying, again reclarify if you're not, that because these attacks are happening in places where there is more cultural and racial diversity then white people should get out and get safe in all white areas? And by extrapolation of your point, again correct me if I'm wrong, you're suggesting it's just an "people of colour issue", and for reasons of safety white people should segregate themselves, away from the "bad contingent"?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orwegian BlueMan
over a year ago

Iceland, but Aldi is closer..

Unfortunately there are a lot of horrible little scrotes that think they are above the law.. The reason, the rest of their family are horrible scrotes that think they too are above the law.

Example, that kid that died when he crashed a moped in North London while being chased by the police.. Reason he died, cos he didn't stop like normal law abiding people do.

His family openly harass the police and have a petition accusing the police of their son's death.

With attitudes like this across the country, it's impossible to stop the mindless attacks.

Tougher sentencing would help except the lily live_ed liberals then are up in arms about it.

Until as a society we say enough is enough and allow for far tougher policing where the guilty are made to suffer, nothing will change.

The police are powerless most of the time because of bullshit beurocracy getting in the way and a fear that they will end up being punished themselves for trying to do their job.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

An overtly disciplinarian attitude doesn't always work. Just sayin'. But that's a whole other debate.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lem-H-Fandango OP   Man
over a year ago

salisbury


"You realize car batteries contain acid I suspect, so do you need a licence to buy a battery under your rule? Why not call for teenagers to be locked up from age 12 to 21 just to be certain.

Some publicity about the damage acid can do with appropriate sentences for those caught is all that is needed. A shoot to kill arrest policy may also help.

Yes actually I would approve of car battery car being licensed. Most modern car batteries are sealed units anyway so you don't have to top them up.

It's not just teenagers using acid that's the issue.

Unfortunately a few wrong en have screwed it up for the rest of us. But that's life.

"

Much more likely to be drain cleaner than anything automotive.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

So you're saying, again reclarify if you're not, that because these attacks are happening in places where there is more cultural and racial diversity then white people should get out and get safe in all white areas? And by extrapolation of your point, again correct me if I'm wrong, you're suggesting it's just an "people of colour issue", and for reasons of safety white people should segregate themselves, away from the "bad contingent"?

"

I'm saying it's probably best to not live in an area that has abnormally high rates of violent crime if you don't want your kids to be a victim of it. What's confusing you? Are you suggesting that offending liberals by choosing a less diverse area with a much lower rate of crime should be a greater concern to somebody than their own safety and that of their kids?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"My grandson had some thrown at him on his way home one evening. Most of it missed fortunately. It's the weapon of the day and can be used from feet away, instead of close up, like a knife; which he's also been attacked with, as well as a baseball bat.

You thought of moving to a white neighbourhood? Or are the three aerious assaults on your grandson a small price to pay for being "diverse" and "inclusive"?"

The man who threw the liquid at him was white, so was the teenager who hit him with the baseball bat. Some of his friends are black.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

So you're saying, again reclarify if you're not, that because these attacks are happening in places where there is more cultural and racial diversity then white people should get out and get safe in all white areas? And by extrapolation of your point, again correct me if I'm wrong, you're suggesting it's just an "people of colour issue", and for reasons of safety white people should segregate themselves, away from the "bad contingent"?

I'm saying it's probably best to not live in an area that has abnormally high rates of violent crime if you don't want your kids to be a victim of it. What's confusing you? Are you suggesting that offending liberals by choosing a less diverse area with a much lower rate of crime should be a greater concern to somebody than their own safety and that of their kids?

"

No, I'm not. I was trying to understand the intent behind your point. But it simply seems to be "run away!", "hide!", "not my problem!"

Which is fine.

I guess I'm interested in understanding how we resolve the root causes of the crime and work on addressing it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"My grandson had some thrown at him on his way home one evening. Most of it missed fortunately. It's the weapon of the day and can be used from feet away, instead of close up, like a knife; which he's also been attacked with, as well as a baseball bat.

You thought of moving to a white neighbourhood? Or are the three aerious assaults on your grandson a small price to pay for being "diverse" and "inclusive"?

The man who threw the liquid at him was white, so was the teenager who hit him with the baseball bat. Some of his friends are black."

Thank you for clarifying that, that's interesting.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lem-H-Fandango OP   Man
over a year ago

salisbury

Plus these kind of attacks aren't just an "East London" thing. They're just as prevalent in Devon and Cornwall, Buckinghamshire, West Wales, Suffolk and the highlands of Scotland!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I've lived in this area all of my life, in the same road for most of it. Growing up, the thugs, criminals, knife carriers were mostly white and they squirted people with acid in Jif lemon squeezers; beat people with bars and lumps of wood and wore knuckle dusters. The crimes haven't changed, because there are less white people here. My friend's son died after being stabbed by a white boy. White people are criminals too.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Plus these kind of attacks aren't just an "East London" thing. They're just as prevalent in Devon and Cornwall, Buckinghamshire, West Wales, Suffolk and the highlands of Scotland! "

No, you're wrong, because then it doesn't fit with my personal views and agenda.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lem-H-Fandango OP   Man
over a year ago

salisbury


"

So you're saying, again reclarify if you're not, that because these attacks are happening in places where there is more cultural and racial diversity then white people should get out and get safe in all white areas? And by extrapolation of your point, again correct me if I'm wrong, you're suggesting it's just an "people of colour issue", and for reasons of safety white people should segregate themselves, away from the "bad contingent"?

I'm saying it's probably best to not live in an area that has abnormally high rates of violent crime if you don't want your kids to be a victim of it. What's confusing you? Are you suggesting that offending liberals by choosing a less diverse area with a much lower rate of crime should be a greater concern to somebody than their own safety and that of their kids?

No, I'm not. I was trying to understand the intent behind your point. But it simply seems to be "run away!", "hide!", "not my problem!"

Which is fine.

I guess I'm interested in understanding how we resolve the root causes of the crime and work on addressing it. "

Police with no powers. Put a 14 year old away for 40 years and his friends might think twice about it. Acid is just as dangerous to an individual as a gun is imo.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I've lived in this area all of my life, in the same road for most of it. Growing up, the thugs, criminals, knife carriers were mostly white and they squirted people with acid in Jif lemon squeezers; beat people with bars and lumps of wood and wore knuckle dusters. The crimes haven't changed, because there are less white people here. My friend's son died after being stabbed by a white boy. White people are criminals too. "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

So you're saying, again reclarify if you're not, that because these attacks are happening in places where there is more cultural and racial diversity then white people should get out and get safe in all white areas? And by extrapolation of your point, again correct me if I'm wrong, you're suggesting it's just an "people of colour issue", and for reasons of safety white people should segregate themselves, away from the "bad contingent"?

I'm saying it's probably best to not live in an area that has abnormally high rates of violent crime if you don't want your kids to be a victim of it. What's confusing you? Are you suggesting that offending liberals by choosing a less diverse area with a much lower rate of crime should be a greater concern to somebody than their own safety and that of their kids?

No, I'm not. I was trying to understand the intent behind your point. But it simply seems to be "run away!", "hide!", "not my problem!"

Which is fine.

I guess I'm interested in understanding how we resolve the root causes of the crime and work on addressing it.

Police with no powers. Put a 14 year old away for 40 years and his friends might think twice about it. Acid is just as dangerous to an individual as a gun is imo."

Nods, I'm not disagreeing with that.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

guns are regulated ... doesn't seem to stop folks getting though does it

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Plus these kind of attacks aren't just an "East London" thing. They're just as prevalent in Devon and Cornwall, Buckinghamshire, West Wales, Suffolk and the highlands of Scotland! "

Well that's just categorically untrue and you wont find any stats to support that claim, as it's absurd.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Plus these kind of attacks aren't just an "East London" thing. They're just as prevalent in Devon and Cornwall, Buckinghamshire, West Wales, Suffolk and the highlands of Scotland!

No, you're wrong, because then it doesn't fit with my personal views and agenda."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ANDA2Couple
over a year ago

Henley Arden


"

So you're saying, again reclarify if you're not, that because these attacks are happening in places where there is more cultural and racial diversity then white people should get out and get safe in all white areas? And by extrapolation of your point, again correct me if I'm wrong, you're suggesting it's just an "people of colour issue", and for reasons of safety white people should segregate themselves, away from the "bad contingent"?

I'm saying it's probably best to not live in an area that has abnormally high rates of violent crime if you don't want your kids to be a victim of it. What's confusing you? Are you suggesting that offending liberals by choosing a less diverse area with a much lower rate of crime should be a greater concern to somebody than their own safety and that of their kids?

"

No you said ' thought of moving to a white neighbourhood ' therefore raising the issue of colour and ethnicity. You never mention crime levels.

You made a racist comment. Full stop

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It's quite simple really. Acid thrown in the face could kill, chemical inhalation, blinded, loose footing and serious fall. In addition, the desire to carry a knife means an intent to use it. In both instances, knife and acid use should be treated as attempted murder.

But it won't happen 'cos our judicial system is based on degrees of assault. At this point somebody would say: "get rid of the human rights act" ... there's nothing wrong with the act. It is there to protect the innocent and only becomes controversial when used to defend obvious offenders, but it needs to be so.

Under the act a government has a duty to provide its citizens a 'right to life and protection from harm.' That includes adequate deterrents against criminal acts.

People will not agree, because it's a very emotive subject, but I truly believe that cases of extreme violent crime, attempted murder, and that includes acid throwing and edged weapon assaults should carry a maximum life sentence.

I would also be in favour of capital punishment. We lost that ultimate sanction because of errors in conviction. With today's CCTV footage and forensic science such mistakes shouldn't happen.

Again I'm in a minority, but when we have a generation that actually believes it is okay to carry and use and have no fear over the consequences then the touchy, touchy, feely, freely approach no longer works. I could go on but that's it for now ... and my heart goes out to all those people touched by these insidious crimes.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Plus these kind of attacks aren't just an "East London" thing. They're just as prevalent in Devon and Cornwall, Buckinghamshire, West Wales, Suffolk and the highlands of Scotland!

Well that's just categorically untrue and you wont find any stats to support that claim, as it's absurd."

Google it like you finely suggested earlier

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

So you're saying, again reclarify if you're not, that because these attacks are happening in places where there is more cultural and racial diversity then white people should get out and get safe in all white areas? And by extrapolation of your point, again correct me if I'm wrong, you're suggesting it's just an "people of colour issue", and for reasons of safety white people should segregate themselves, away from the "bad contingent"?

I'm saying it's probably best to not live in an area that has abnormally high rates of violent crime if you don't want your kids to be a victim of it. What's confusing you? Are you suggesting that offending liberals by choosing a less diverse area with a much lower rate of crime should be a greater concern to somebody than their own safety and that of their kids?

No you said ' thought of moving to a white neighbourhood ' therefore raising the issue of colour and ethnicity. You never mention crime levels.

You made a racist comment. Full stop"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

So you're saying, again reclarify if you're not, that because these attacks are happening in places where there is more cultural and racial diversity then white people should get out and get safe in all white areas? And by extrapolation of your point, again correct me if I'm wrong, you're suggesting it's just an "people of colour issue", and for reasons of safety white people should segregate themselves, away from the "bad contingent"?

I'm saying it's probably best to not live in an area that has abnormally high rates of violent crime if you don't want your kids to be a victim of it. What's confusing you? Are you suggesting that offending liberals by choosing a less diverse area with a much lower rate of crime should be a greater concern to somebody than their own safety and that of their kids?

No you said ' thought of moving to a white neighbourhood ' therefore raising the issue of colour and ethnicity. You never mention crime levels.

You made a racist comment. Full stop"

If not pretending that black and Asian neighbourhoods in London are no more dangerous than white ones is "racist", then so be it.

Unfortunately for you, I have published met crime statistics to support my argument, whereas you just have feelings to support yours.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

So you're saying, again reclarify if you're not, that because these attacks are happening in places where there is more cultural and racial diversity then white people should get out and get safe in all white areas? And by extrapolation of your point, again correct me if I'm wrong, you're suggesting it's just an "people of colour issue", and for reasons of safety white people should segregate themselves, away from the "bad contingent"?

I'm saying it's probably best to not live in an area that has abnormally high rates of violent crime if you don't want your kids to be a victim of it. What's confusing you? Are you suggesting that offending liberals by choosing a less diverse area with a much lower rate of crime should be a greater concern to somebody than their own safety and that of their kids?

No you said ' thought of moving to a white neighbourhood ' therefore raising the issue of colour and ethnicity. You never mention crime levels.

You made a racist comment. Full stop

If not pretending that black and Asian neighbourhoods in London are no more dangerous than white ones is "racist", then so be it.

Unfortunately for you, I have published met crime statistics to support my argument, whereas you just have feelings to support yours."

Poorer areas have more crime. Stop the press.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

So you're saying, again reclarify if you're not, that because these attacks are happening in places where there is more cultural and racial diversity then white people should get out and get safe in all white areas? And by extrapolation of your point, again correct me if I'm wrong, you're suggesting it's just an "people of colour issue", and for reasons of safety white people should segregate themselves, away from the "bad contingent"?

I'm saying it's probably best to not live in an area that has abnormally high rates of violent crime if you don't want your kids to be a victim of it. What's confusing you? Are you suggesting that offending liberals by choosing a less diverse area with a much lower rate of crime should be a greater concern to somebody than their own safety and that of their kids?

No you said ' thought of moving to a white neighbourhood ' therefore raising the issue of colour and ethnicity. You never mention crime levels.

You made a racist comment. Full stop"

Nods.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

So you're saying, again reclarify if you're not, that because these attacks are happening in places where there is more cultural and racial diversity then white people should get out and get safe in all white areas? And by extrapolation of your point, again correct me if I'm wrong, you're suggesting it's just an "people of colour issue", and for reasons of safety white people should segregate themselves, away from the "bad contingent"?

I'm saying it's probably best to not live in an area that has abnormally high rates of violent crime if you don't want your kids to be a victim of it. What's confusing you? Are you suggesting that offending liberals by choosing a less diverse area with a much lower rate of crime should be a greater concern to somebody than their own safety and that of their kids?

No you said ' thought of moving to a white neighbourhood ' therefore raising the issue of colour and ethnicity. You never mention crime levels.

You made a racist comment. Full stop

If not pretending that black and Asian neighbourhoods in London are no more dangerous than white ones is "racist", then so be it.

Unfortunately for you, I have published met crime statistics to support my argument, whereas you just have feelings to support yours.

Poorer areas have more crime. Stop the press."

They usually have more people too. More people equals more crimes.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

So you're saying, again reclarify if you're not, that because these attacks are happening in places where there is more cultural and racial diversity then white people should get out and get safe in all white areas? And by extrapolation of your point, again correct me if I'm wrong, you're suggesting it's just an "people of colour issue", and for reasons of safety white people should segregate themselves, away from the "bad contingent"?

I'm saying it's probably best to not live in an area that has abnormally high rates of violent crime if you don't want your kids to be a victim of it. What's confusing you? Are you suggesting that offending liberals by choosing a less diverse area with a much lower rate of crime should be a greater concern to somebody than their own safety and that of their kids?

No you said ' thought of moving to a white neighbourhood ' therefore raising the issue of colour and ethnicity. You never mention crime levels.

You made a racist comment. Full stop

If not pretending that black and Asian neighbourhoods in London are no more dangerous than white ones is "racist", then so be it.

Unfortunately for you, I have published met crime statistics to support my argument, whereas you just have feelings to support yours.

Poorer areas have more crime. Stop the press."

I know, right?!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orwegian BlueMan
over a year ago

Iceland, but Aldi is closer..


"Plus these kind of attacks aren't just an "East London" thing. They're just as prevalent in Devon and Cornwall, Buckinghamshire, West Wales, Suffolk and the highlands of Scotland!

Well that's just categorically untrue and you wont find any stats to support that claim, as it's absurd."

No crime in Scotland or Cornwall... I'm moving there then..

Oh shit, just checked..

There are attacks on people in those areas..

Knife crime, gun crime, violent robbery.. Shit it happens there too..

Oh well, I may as well stay where I am content in the knowledge I will be killed in a violent attack soon.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It makes me feel sick. What goes through peoples minds to make them want to permantly want to deform people"

Totally agree....what abhorrent thoughts people must have to be able to carry out such a horror!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Plus these kind of attacks aren't just an "East London" thing. They're just as prevalent in Devon and Cornwall, Buckinghamshire, West Wales, Suffolk and the highlands of Scotland!

Well that's just categorically untrue and you wont find any stats to support that claim, as it's absurd.

Google it like you finely suggested earlier "

Yeah, googled it and I'm right and you're wrong, sorry...

http://tinypic.com/r/vgs8rr/9

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Plus these kind of attacks aren't just an "East London" thing. They're just as prevalent in Devon and Cornwall, Buckinghamshire, West Wales, Suffolk and the highlands of Scotland!

Well that's just categorically untrue and you wont find any stats to support that claim, as it's absurd.

No crime in Scotland or Cornwall... I'm moving there then..

Oh shit, just checked..

There are attacks on people in those areas..

Knife crime, gun crime, violent robbery.. Shit it happens there too..

Oh well, I may as well stay where I am content in the knowledge I will be killed in a violent attack soon. "

Cornwall -- Andreas Christopheros, 29, was left blind in one eye after David Phillips, 49, from Hastings, Sussex, assaulted him with acid at his home in Truro, Cornwall.

Scotland -- William Burns, 56, threw sulphuric acid into Russell Findlay's face after turning up at his door disguised as a postman on 23 December 2015 in Glasgow.

Acid attacks happen in Cornwall and Scotland too.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Violent crime heat maps are racist!!!"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ANDA2Couple
over a year ago

Henley Arden


"

So you're saying, again reclarify if you're not, that because these attacks are happening in places where there is more cultural and racial diversity then white people should get out and get safe in all white areas? And by extrapolation of your point, again correct me if I'm wrong, you're suggesting it's just an "people of colour issue", and for reasons of safety white people should segregate themselves, away from the "bad contingent"?

I'm saying it's probably best to not live in an area that has abnormally high rates of violent crime if you don't want your kids to be a victim of it. What's confusing you? Are you suggesting that offending liberals by choosing a less diverse area with a much lower rate of crime should be a greater concern to somebody than their own safety and that of their kids?

No you said ' thought of moving to a white neighbourhood ' therefore raising the issue of colour and ethnicity. You never mention crime levels.

You made a racist comment. Full stop

If not pretending that black and Asian neighbourhoods in London are no more dangerous than white ones is "racist", then so be it.

Unfortunately for you, I have published met crime statistics to support my argument, whereas you just have feelings to support yours."

Do you have them for the UK?

Glasgow Was /is the UKs most violent city yet is 92% white.

See where statistics get you.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Are we just going to ignore the demographics p_edominantly carrying out the attacks for the sake of being politically correct?

I didn't know there was one? Obviously with the Asian "honour" acid attacks that's part of their culture. Society probably shouldn't interfere. But is there a demographic on mopeds?"

Sorry i would just like to point out this is not a part of my culture or any other culture. It is mindless people that do this kind of thing

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

So you're saying, again reclarify if you're not, that because these attacks are happening in places where there is more cultural and racial diversity then white people should get out and get safe in all white areas? And by extrapolation of your point, again correct me if I'm wrong, you're suggesting it's just an "people of colour issue", and for reasons of safety white people should segregate themselves, away from the "bad contingent"?

I'm saying it's probably best to not live in an area that has abnormally high rates of violent crime if you don't want your kids to be a victim of it. What's confusing you? Are you suggesting that offending liberals by choosing a less diverse area with a much lower rate of crime should be a greater concern to somebody than their own safety and that of their kids?

No you said ' thought of moving to a white neighbourhood ' therefore raising the issue of colour and ethnicity. You never mention crime levels.

You made a racist comment. Full stop

If not pretending that black and Asian neighbourhoods in London are no more dangerous than white ones is "racist", then so be it.

Unfortunately for you, I have published met crime statistics to support my argument, whereas you just have feelings to support yours.

Do you have them for the UK?

Glasgow Was /is the UKs most violent city yet is 92% white.

See where statistics get you.

"

See the map I linked above. End of debate.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


""Violent crime heat maps are racist!!!" "

No, they're not.

Making comments focused on ethnicity and race and colour in a way that indicates no violent crime (acid attacks in this discussion) happen in white areas *is* racist and factually incorrect.

It's easy to reframe your point after the fact. If your post was unintentionally racist at the start, maybe perhaps be clearer in future, communicate better.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


""Violent crime heat maps are racist!!!" "

You look and sound familiar; haven't you been banned from here several times before?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


""Violent crime heat maps are racist!!!"

You look and sound familiar; haven't you been banned from here several times before?"

Yes, he has.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"We've lost the argument, ban him!"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


""We've lost the argument, ban him!"

"

No-one has asked for that. You really do have a struggle with communication, eh?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ANDA2Couple
over a year ago

Henley Arden


"

So you're saying, again reclarify if you're not, that because these attacks are happening in places where there is more cultural and racial diversity then white people should get out and get safe in all white areas? And by extrapolation of your point, again correct me if I'm wrong, you're suggesting it's just an "people of colour issue", and for reasons of safety white people should segregate themselves, away from the "bad contingent"?

I'm saying it's probably best to not live in an area that has abnormally high rates of violent crime if you don't want your kids to be a victim of it. What's confusing you? Are you suggesting that offending liberals by choosing a less diverse area with a much lower rate of crime should be a greater concern to somebody than their own safety and that of their kids?

No you said ' thought of moving to a white neighbourhood ' therefore raising the issue of colour and ethnicity. You never mention crime levels.

You made a racist comment. Full stop

If not pretending that black and Asian neighbourhoods in London are no more dangerous than white ones is "racist", then so be it.

Unfortunately for you, I have published met crime statistics to support my argument, whereas you just have feelings to support yours.

Do you have them for the UK?

Glasgow Was /is the UKs most violent city yet is 92% white.

See where statistics get you.

See the map I linked above. End of debate."

Your on the wrong site. You need the alt right with your views.

You started with a racist comment and continued in that fashion.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lim rizlaMan
over a year ago

The dude is right (the one who preaches like Enoch). There is more crime in ethnically mixed areas. But...

They are usually poorer and more populated than the posh areas. That is the only reason why.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *igblackdomTV/TS
over a year ago

West Midlands


""Violent crime heat maps are racist!!!" "

Tempting extrapolation of what appears to be simple logic isn't it?

The problem with your analogy is that in the leafier suburbs where Asian & Black doctors, academics and business owners live and fraternise with their white contemporaries the racial crime 'demographic' as you call it isn't replicated, in other words blacks and Asians don't have a propensity towards violent crime.

The areas you highlight have high population densities, poverty and poor education is a determinant of crime (as another poster pointed out), although it would be wrong and unhelpful to suggest everyone who's poor and poorly educated is likely to commit crime...would you mind disclosing your own antecedence, you appear to be protesting too much.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


""We've lost the argument, ban him!"

"

It's not about your differing opinion. And no, your 'argument' just proves exactly what I said - poorer areas have more crime.

You'll have to do a bit better than that.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

Your on the wrong site. You need the alt right with your views.

You started with a racist comment and continued in that fashion. "

I made a claim and provided irrefutable evidence to back it up, you screaming buzzwords like "racist" and "alt-right" isn't isn't counter-argument, sorry.

You lose.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


""We've lost the argument, ban him!"

It's not about your differing opinion. And no, your 'argument' just proves exactly what I said - poorer areas have more crime.

You'll have to do a bit better than that.

"

And they had more crime when they were p_edominantly white.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *edMan
over a year ago

cambridgeshire

I don't want to say it, because I know it's almost barbaric, but I recall seeing the result of one of these attacks and thinking this is one crime where the old saying

'an eye for an eye' seems fair...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Are we just going to ignore the demographics p_edominantly carrying out the attacks for the sake of being politically correct?

I didn't know there was one? Obviously with the Asian "honour" acid attacks that's part of their culture. Society probably shouldn't interfere. But is there a demographic on mopeds?"

I don't agree, acid attacks cannot be justified by saying it's part of their culture. This is 2017, there's no place in our society for "Asian honour attacks"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


""We've lost the argument, ban him!"

It's not about your differing opinion. And no, your 'argument' just proves exactly what I said - poorer areas have more crime.

You'll have to do a bit better than that.

And they had more crime when they were p_edominantly white. "

Careful, you'll make stompy stompy pout pouts happen!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Are we just going to ignore the demographics p_edominantly carrying out the attacks for the sake of being politically correct?

I didn't know there was one? Obviously with the Asian "honour" acid attacks that's part of their culture. Society probably shouldn't interfere. But is there a demographic on mopeds?

I don't agree, acid attacks cannot be justified by saying it's part of their culture. This is 2017, there's no place in our society for "Asian honour attacks""

Not fucking part of our culture !!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

As usual a simple subject goes of the rail once more,the forum really pisses me off sometimes

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ANDA2Couple
over a year ago

Henley Arden


"

Your on the wrong site. You need the alt right with your views.

You started with a racist comment and continued in that fashion.

I made a claim and provided irrefutable evidence to back it up, you screaming buzzwords like "racist" and "alt-right" isn't isn't counter-argument, sorry.

You lose."

No you made a statement infiring colour. That is racist - simple.

Blunt and crude use of 'statistics ' actually show you don't understand them.

Crime rates in the U.K. were extremely high in the 1700/1800/1900's so they brought in Transportation yet the population was 99.99% white.

Where does that leave your heat map theory?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


""Violent crime heat maps are racist!!!"

Tempting extrapolation of what appears to be simple logic isn't it?

The problem with your analogy is that in the leafier suburbs where Asian & Black doctors, academics and business owners live and fraternise with their white contemporaries the racial crime 'demographic' as you call it isn't replicated, in other words blacks and Asians don't have a propensity towards violent crime.

The areas you highlight have high population densities, poverty and poor education is a determinant of crime (as another poster pointed out), although it would be wrong and unhelpful to suggest everyone who's poor and poorly educated is likely to commit crime...would you mind disclosing your own antecedence, you appear to be protesting too much."

I dont disagree with any of that. Nowhere have I said "blacks and Asians are best avoided" - what I said was, "areas with abnormally high rates of violent crime are best avoided" - I would say the same if these areas were majority white (in Liverpool and Glasgow, they are) but we were talking about London, where the areas with the highest amount of violent crime are black/Asian areas.

People then went off on one about me daring to mention that fact.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"My grandson had some thrown at him on his way home one evening. Most of it missed fortunately. It's the weapon of the day and can be used from feet away, instead of close up, like a knife; which he's also been attacked with, as well as a baseball bat.

You thought of moving to a white neighbourhood? Or are the three aerious assaults on your grandson a small price to pay for being "diverse" and "inclusive"?

That a serious question??

Shit, silly racist me forgot acid, baseball bat and knife attacks are just as common in Richmond and Primrose Hill as they are in Barking and Mile End. Apologies.

Ffs.

So the point you're making is that if racially driven attacks are happening then you're advising the whites to get out and get to safety in a white area? Not, that perhaps we should stand up against racism?

Mmm. Part of the problem methinks. "

The definition of racism is to be prejudiced against the minority race, therefore by definition, these attacks are not racial. Standing up to them however, by definition would be racist.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

Your on the wrong site. You need the alt right with your views.

You started with a racist comment and continued in that fashion.

I made a claim and provided irrefutable evidence to back it up, you screaming buzzwords like "racist" and "alt-right" isn't isn't counter-argument, sorry.

You lose.

No you made a statement infiring colour. That is racist - simple.

Blunt and crude use of 'statistics ' actually show you don't understand them.

Crime rates in the U.K. were extremely high in the 1700/1800/1900's so they brought in Transportation yet the population was 99.99% white.

Where does that leave your heat map theory? "

This is the 21st century, not the 18th, 19th or 20th century. Things change and one has to look at the here and now

Having said that, most Asian areas are more peaceful than elsewhere

- Mrs. J -

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"My grandson had some thrown at him on his way home one evening. Most of it missed fortunately. It's the weapon of the day and can be used from feet away, instead of close up, like a knife; which he's also been attacked with, as well as a baseball bat.

You thought of moving to a white neighbourhood? Or are the three aerious assaults on your grandson a small price to pay for being "diverse" and "inclusive"?

That a serious question??

Shit, silly racist me forgot acid, baseball bat and knife attacks are just as common in Richmond and Primrose Hill as they are in Barking and Mile End. Apologies.

Ffs.

So the point you're making is that if racially driven attacks are happening then you're advising the whites to get out and get to safety in a white area? Not, that perhaps we should stand up against racism?

Mmm. Part of the problem methinks.

The definition of racism is to be prejudiced against the minority race, therefore by definition, these attacks are not racial. Standing up to them however, by definition would be racist."

I think you misunderstood my question.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ANDA2Couple
over a year ago

Henley Arden


""Violent crime heat maps are racist!!!"

Tempting extrapolation of what appears to be simple logic isn't it?

The problem with your analogy is that in the leafier suburbs where Asian & Black doctors, academics and business owners live and fraternise with their white contemporaries the racial crime 'demographic' as you call it isn't replicated, in other words blacks and Asians don't have a propensity towards violent crime.

The areas you highlight have high population densities, poverty and poor education is a determinant of crime (as another poster pointed out), although it would be wrong and unhelpful to suggest everyone who's poor and poorly educated is likely to commit crime...would you mind disclosing your own antecedence, you appear to be protesting too much.

I dont disagree with any of that. Nowhere have I said "blacks and Asians are best avoided" - what I said was, "areas with abnormally high rates of violent crime are best avoided" - I would say the same if these areas were majority white (in Liverpool and Glasgow, they are) but we were talking about London, where the areas with the highest amount of violent crime are black/Asian areas.

People then went off on one about me daring to mention that fact."

No no no no no

You said ' have you thought of moving to a white neighbourhood' therefore infiring non white areas are more violent.

That's what people drew the attention too.

Stop trying to dodge your statement

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ANDA2Couple
over a year ago

Henley Arden

Your also trying to use statistics is a blunt and crude form to justify a racist statement.

You have not once included all the other factors eg Pop. density, income range, unemployment, etc etc. These are greater factors than colour of skin or race.

Anyway arguing with you is like pushing custard uphill. It's a pointless exercise so I will pursue other more fruitful endeavours.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Yet the OP who said that acid attacks were part of Muslim culture has managed to dodge the 'racist' label.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


""Violent crime heat maps are racist!!!"

Tempting extrapolation of what appears to be simple logic isn't it?

The problem with your analogy is that in the leafier suburbs where Asian & Black doctors, academics and business owners live and fraternise with their white contemporaries the racial crime 'demographic' as you call it isn't replicated, in other words blacks and Asians don't have a propensity towards violent crime.

The areas you highlight have high population densities, poverty and poor education is a determinant of crime (as another poster pointed out), although it would be wrong and unhelpful to suggest everyone who's poor and poorly educated is likely to commit crime...would you mind disclosing your own antecedence, you appear to be protesting too much."

Excellent post

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Racist, homophobic, ageist are overused terms. The loony left use these more frequently than a "good morning"

- Mrs. J -

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Yet the OP who said that acid attacks were part of Muslim culture has managed to dodge the 'racist' label. "

He said nothing about muslim culture he said asian culture

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire


""Violent crime heat maps are racist!!!"

Tempting extrapolation of what appears to be simple logic isn't it?

The problem with your analogy is that in the leafier suburbs where Asian & Black doctors, academics and business owners live and fraternise with their white contemporaries the racial crime 'demographic' as you call it isn't replicated, in other words blacks and Asians don't have a propensity towards violent crime.

The areas you highlight have high population densities, poverty and poor education is a determinant of crime (as another poster pointed out), although it would be wrong and unhelpful to suggest everyone who's poor and poorly educated is likely to commit crime...would you mind disclosing your own antecedence, you appear to be protesting too much.

Excellent post "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Racist, homophobic, ageist are overused terms. The loony left use these more frequently than a "good morning"

- Mrs. J -"

It's their way of shutting down a debate when presented with facts and they have no way to counter them because they have absolutely no idea what they're talking about.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Racist, homophobic, ageist are overused terms. The loony left use these more frequently than a "good morning"

- Mrs. J -

It's their way of shutting down a debate when presented with facts and they have no way to counter them because they have absolutely no idea what they're talking about.

"

They aren't facts they are your inferences based on the data you have selected. Subjective

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lem-H-Fandango OP   Man
over a year ago

salisbury

Anyway.... should it be more difficult for you to unblock your sink, just because there's a dozen little scroats out there wasting oxygen? I say no. I say lock them up for a long long time. Maybe that will stop their peers thinking its ok.(whatever colour they are).

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Anyway.... should it be more difficult for you to unblock your sink, just because there's a dozen little scroats out there wasting oxygen? I say no. I say lock them up for a long long time. Maybe that will stop their peers thinking its ok.(whatever colour they are)."

Well, don't put rubbish down the sink

- Mrs. J -

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Racist, homophobic, ageist are overused terms. The loony left use these more frequently than a "good morning"

- Mrs. J -

It's their way of shutting down a debate when presented with facts and they have no way to counter them because they have absolutely no idea what they're talking about.

They aren't facts they are your inferences based on the data you have selected. Subjective"

Boom.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 15/07/17 14:50:48]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Anyway.... should it be more difficult for you to unblock your sink, just because there's a dozen little scroats out there wasting oxygen? I say no. I say lock them up for a long long time. Maybe that will stop their peers thinking its ok.(whatever colour they are).

Well, don't put rubbish down the sink

- Mrs. J -"

The only reason I've had to unblock a plug hole is long hair, cove_ed in conditioner creating fur balls

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Anyone wanting sulphuric acid just needs to empty a car battery so implementing laws restricting acid sales is just a knee jerk reaction.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

WTF dude this is not some Alt right website.

Assault of any type is not restricted to creed, colour, class or location. It's about violence and assault.

Have been stabbed and burgled. Guess what they were white in a p_edominantly white area.

And yes a licence should be needed to buy acid.

It really is a simple as googling where the majority of these attacks happen and then googling the population demographics of said area. I know facts and truth are deeply offensive and it's your right to be offended, but denying it to be true just makes you look at best, in denial, at worst, thick."

Oh my god he has Google so he must be right . Everyone lock themselves inside

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *opsy RogersWoman
over a year ago

London

What sort of life have people lived that they think throwing acid over another is ok?

Why are we failing people in such a massive way?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lem-H-Fandango OP   Man
over a year ago

salisbury


"What sort of life have people lived that they think throwing acid over another is ok?

Why are we failing people in such a massive way?"

I blame the parent.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iavelmanMan
over a year ago

Worcester


"Are we just going to ignore the demographics p_edominantly carrying out the attacks for the sake of being politically correct?

I didn't know there was one? Obviously with the Asian "honour" acid attacks that's part of their culture. Society probably shouldn't interfere. But is there a demographic on mopeds?"

Are you really saying that acid attacks are ok so long as it is part of their culture?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lem-H-Fandango OP   Man
over a year ago

salisbury


"Are we just going to ignore the demographics p_edominantly carrying out the attacks for the sake of being politically correct?

I didn't know there was one? Obviously with the Asian "honour" acid attacks that's part of their culture. Society probably shouldn't interfere. But is there a demographic on mopeds?

Are you really saying that acid attacks are ok so long as it is part of their culture? "

Of course I'm not. But i have heard that argument used in support of female genital mutilation.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"You realize car batteries contain acid I suspect, so do you need a licence to buy a battery under your rule? Why not call for teenagers to be locked up from age 12 to 21 just to be certain.

Some publicity about the damage acid can do with appropriate sentences for those caught is all that is needed. A shoot to kill arrest policy may also help.

Yes actually I would approve of car battery car being licensed. Most modern car batteries are sealed units anyway so you don't have to top them up.

It's not just teenagers using acid that's the issue.

Unfortunately a few wrong en have screwed it up for the rest of us. But that's life.

"

Cars can be stolen and the battery acid drained, so making it harder to buy car batteries is not really useful, and potentially makes the issue worse.

My real point is acid and alkali are common use products all around us. Attempting to restrict the supply is not a viable solution.

Long harsh sentences would work but I fear TV / Internet make these crimes "cool" and kids do them without thinking of the victim. We already banned guns from all the legitimate sports / collectors, knives are now banned despite them being a useful tool. Banning lead acid batteries and hund_eds of cleaning products is not a good plan.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"What sort of life have people lived that they think throwing acid over another is ok?

Why are we failing people in such a massive way?

I blame the parent."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ophieslutTV/TS
over a year ago

Central

I've no clue what sales restrictions there are on acid but it would seem reasonable for very dangerous stuff to be controlled.

If there's an underlying reason for this, it should be addressed too. Often penalties have a minor part to play but appropriate penalties should apply.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Anyway.... should it be more difficult for you to unblock your sink, just because there's a dozen little scroats out there wasting oxygen? I say no. I say lock them up for a long long time. Maybe that will stop their peers thinking its ok.(whatever colour they are).

Well, don't put rubbish down the sink

- Mrs. J -

The only reason I've had to unblock a plug hole is long hair, cove_ed in conditioner creating fur balls "

Go to a salon and more often Problem solved

- Mrs. J -

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 15/07/17 15:12:36]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Acid attacks are part of gang culture more than anything. I first heard about them years ago from talking to a Jamaican friend. Its pretty big in Jamaican gang culture apparently. You see a lot of the yardies bearing the scars from it

But yeah these kinda crimes where you are purposely trying to disfigure people need really harsh sentences

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ranny-CrumpetWoman
over a year ago

The Town by The Cross


"

WTF dude this is not some Alt right website.

Assault of any type is not restricted to creed, colour, class or location. It's about violence and assault.

Have been stabbed and burgled. Guess what they were white in a p_edominantly white area.

And yes a licence should be needed to buy acid.

It really is a simple as googling where the majority of these attacks happen and then googling the population demographics of said area. I know facts and truth are deeply offensive and it's your right to be offended, but denying it to be true just makes you look at best, in denial, at worst, thick."

How about Googling the perpetrators and the victims... instead of the area.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I've no clue what sales restrictions there are on acid but it would seem reasonable for very dangerous stuff to be controlled.

If there's an underlying reason for this, it should be addressed too. Often penalties have a minor part to play but appropriate penalties should apply."

As a rule acetic acid is much easier to buy than lysergic acid... many acids are used commonly sulphuric (batteries) and phosphoric (descaller) often hydrochloric acid is sold as drain cleaner, can also be used on limescale. Many cleaners are alkali which can be just as destructive to soft tissue.

Sales restrictions are typically on quantity in a package, sometimes on strength.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lem-H-Fandango OP   Man
over a year ago

salisbury


"Acid attacks are part of gang culture more than anything. I first heard about them years ago from talking to a Jamaican friend. Its pretty big in Jamaican gang culture apparently. You see a lot of the yardies bearing the scars from it

But yeah these kinda crimes where you are purposely trying to disfigure people need really harsh sentences "

Interesting

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

For me the problem is the sentencing and how long they actually serve. How many times do we hear on the news a reporter tell us how long a criminal has been sentenced to but then in the same breath the reporter tells us what they will really serve!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Blame men.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orum TrollWoman
over a year ago

•+• Access Denied •+•

control over sale rather than longer punishments.

makes economical sense as you can fine those breaking the law rather than imprison them and therefore have to pay for that.

and how many people really need sulphuric acid anyway?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orwegian BlueMan
over a year ago

Iceland, but Aldi is closer..


"Are we just going to ignore the demographics p_edominantly carrying out the attacks for the sake of being politically correct?

I didn't know there was one? Obviously with the Asian "honour" acid attacks that's part of their culture. Society probably shouldn't interfere. But is there a demographic on mopeds?

I don't agree, acid attacks cannot be justified by saying it's part of their culture. This is 2017, there's no place in our society for "Asian honour attacks"

Not fucking part of our culture !!!"

Not part of your culture, I believe you... I'm sure you are a very pleasant, morally upstanding person like most of us here.

However, it does happen and it is partly due to the lower standing and opinion held of women in certain areas of the world, where women are second class and their only role is to serve men....

This outdated male chauvinistic opinion is being less and less tolerated as the countries in question become more liberal in their religious and political views but unfortunately still does go unpunished...

It is an unfortunate fact that genital mutilation and the reported so called honour attacks are limited to certain racial groups.

Like it or not, this is a fact and it doesn't make it right.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *igblackdomTV/TS
over a year ago

West Midlands


"Racist, homophobic, ageist are overused terms. The loony left use these more frequently than a "good morning"

- Mrs. J -"

..and in equal measure the racists, homophobes, ageists denounce their detractors by describing them as the 'loony left'. The cap may or may not fit in any group.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *igblackdomTV/TS
over a year ago

West Midlands


"Racist, homophobic, ageist are overused terms. The loony left use these more frequently than a "good morning"

- Mrs. J -

It's their way of shutting down a debate when presented with facts and they have no way to counter them because they have absolutely no idea what they're talking about.

"

The 'facts' have been counte_ed ad nauseum, the unequivocal fact is that you're not prepa_ed to consider rational argument challenging your invective.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Racist, homophobic, ageist are overused terms. The loony left use these more frequently than a "good morning"

- Mrs. J -

..and in equal measure the racists, homophobes, ageists denounce their detractors by describing them as the 'loony left'. The cap may or may not fit in any group."

Nope; the loony left are exactly that; lunatics

Racist means when someone beats the crap out of someone else because they are a certain race or they are bar_ed from employment because of their race. Stating facts is *not* racist. That was just one example

Black people have a very different genetic makeup; so much so, that their eGFR needs to be multiplied by 1.21 to get meaningful data. The loony left will call that being racist as they are being treated differently

- Mrs. J -

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *igblackdomTV/TS
over a year ago

West Midlands


"Racist, homophobic, ageist are overused terms. The loony left use these more frequently than a "good morning"

- Mrs. J -

..and in equal measure the racists, homophobes, ageists denounce their detractors by describing them as the 'loony left'. The cap may or may not fit in any group.

Nope; the loony left are exactly that; lunatics

Racist means when someone beats the crap out of someone else because they are a certain race or they are bar_ed from employment because of their race. Stating facts is *not* racist. That was just one example

Black people have a very different genetic makeup; so much so, that their eGFR needs to be multiplied by 1.21 to get meaningful data. The loony left will call that being racist as they are being treated differently

- Mrs. J -"

Stating facts is indeed *not* racist, however that doesn't mean the person stating them isn't necessarily a racist.

Incidentally, I'm afraid I'm going to have to disagree with your definition of the term.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orum TrollWoman
over a year ago

•+• Access Denied •+•


"Racist, homophobic, ageist are overused terms. The loony left use these more frequently than a "good morning"

- Mrs. J -

..and in equal measure the racists, homophobes, ageists denounce their detractors by describing them as the 'loony left'. The cap may or may not fit in any group.

Nope; the loony left are exactly that; lunatics

Racist means when someone beats the crap out of someone else because they are a certain race or they are bar_ed from employment because of their race. Stating facts is *not* racist. That was just one example

Black people have a very different genetic makeup; so much so, that their eGFR needs to be multiplied by 1.21 to get meaningful data. The loony left will call that being racist as they are being treated differently

- Mrs. J -"

racism is:

prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race is superior.

and the belief that all members of each race possess characteristics, abilities, or qualities specific to that race, especially so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to another race or races.

so, wtf? science creating more accurate results does not make anyone a loony. neither does being PC.

right wing, christian kkk are racist. right wing neo-nazis are too.

sorry but your right wing people have a lot more branches that are loony than the left have. looking worse from your side than this one.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Racist, homophobic, ageist are overused terms. The loony left use these more frequently than a "good morning"

- Mrs. J -

..and in equal measure the racists, homophobes, ageists denounce their detractors by describing them as the 'loony left'. The cap may or may not fit in any group.

Nope; the loony left are exactly that; lunatics

Racist means when someone beats the crap out of someone else because they are a certain race or they are bar_ed from employment because of their race. Stating facts is *not* racist. That was just one example

Black people have a very different genetic makeup; so much so, that their eGFR needs to be multiplied by 1.21 to get meaningful data. The loony left will call that being racist as they are being treated differently

- Mrs. J -

Stating facts is indeed *not* racist, however that doesn't mean the person stating them isn't necessarily a racist.

Incidentally, I'm afraid I'm going to have to disagree with your definition of the term."

You are more than welcome to disagree

What is *your* definition of a racist?

On this site, I have read that a white person who does not want to have sex with a black person, is racist. Now is that the loony left or is that the far-loony-left?

- Mrs. J -

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Racist, homophobic, ageist are overused terms. The loony left use these more frequently than a "good morning"

- Mrs. J -

..and in equal measure the racists, homophobes, ageists denounce their detractors by describing them as the 'loony left'. The cap may or may not fit in any group.

Nope; the loony left are exactly that; lunatics

Racist means when someone beats the crap out of someone else because they are a certain race or they are bar_ed from employment because of their race. Stating facts is *not* racist. That was just one example

Black people have a very different genetic makeup; so much so, that their eGFR needs to be multiplied by 1.21 to get meaningful data. The loony left will call that being racist as they are being treated differently

- Mrs. J -

racism is:

prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race is superior.

and the belief that all members of each race possess characteristics, abilities, or qualities specific to that race, especially so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to another race or races.

so, wtf? science creating more accurate results does not make anyone a loony. neither does being PC.

right wing, christian kkk are racist. right wing neo-nazis are too.

sorry but your right wing people have a lot more branches that are loony than the left have. looking worse from your side than this one."

Who told you that I am right wing? I happen to think that all 'wings' are stupid

- Mrs. J -

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"You are more than welcome to disagree

What is *your* definition of a racist?

On this site, I have read that a white person who does not want to have sex with a black person, is racist. Now is that the loony left or is that the far-loony-left?

- Mrs. J -"

Pretty sure social or religious views have never been a feature of the racist / preference threads, so they would be equally loony left and ridiculous right.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orum TrollWoman
over a year ago

•+• Access Denied •+•


"Racist, homophobic, ageist are overused terms. The loony left use these more frequently than a "good morning"

- Mrs. J -

..and in equal measure the racists, homophobes, ageists denounce their detractors by describing them as the 'loony left'. The cap may or may not fit in any group.

Nope; the loony left are exactly that; lunatics

Racist means when someone beats the crap out of someone else because they are a certain race or they are bar_ed from employment because of their race. Stating facts is *not* racist. That was just one example

Black people have a very different genetic makeup; so much so, that their eGFR needs to be multiplied by 1.21 to get meaningful data. The loony left will call that being racist as they are being treated differently

- Mrs. J -

racism is:

prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race is superior.

and the belief that all members of each race possess characteristics, abilities, or qualities specific to that race, especially so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to another race or races.

so, wtf? science creating more accurate results does not make anyone a loony. neither does being PC.

right wing, christian kkk are racist. right wing neo-nazis are too.

sorry but your right wing people have a lot more branches that are loony than the left have. looking worse from your side than this one.

Who told you that I am right wing? I happen to think that all 'wings' are stupid

- Mrs. J -"

the fact you think there's a loony left. plus you do come off as conservative.

maybe you're just misinformed? you don't seem that unintelligent though.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"You are more than welcome to disagree

What is *your* definition of a racist?

On this site, I have read that a white person who does not want to have sex with a black person, is racist. Now is that the loony left or is that the far-loony-left?

- Mrs. J -

Pretty sure social or religious views have never been a feature of the racist / preference threads, so they would be equally loony left and ridiculous right. "

Don't tell me that people have religious views on who they will have sex with

This is a weird place

- Mrs. J -

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Racist, homophobic, ageist are overused terms. The loony left use these more frequently than a "good morning"

- Mrs. J -

..and in equal measure the racists, homophobes, ageists denounce their detractors by describing them as the 'loony left'. The cap may or may not fit in any group.

Nope; the loony left are exactly that; lunatics

Racist means when someone beats the crap out of someone else because they are a certain race or they are bar_ed from employment because of their race. Stating facts is *not* racist. That was just one example

Black people have a very different genetic makeup; so much so, that their eGFR needs to be multiplied by 1.21 to get meaningful data. The loony left will call that being racist as they are being treated differently

- Mrs. J -

racism is:

prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race is superior.

and the belief that all members of each race possess characteristics, abilities, or qualities specific to that race, especially so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to another race or races.

so, wtf? science creating more accurate results does not make anyone a loony. neither does being PC.

right wing, christian kkk are racist. right wing neo-nazis are too.

sorry but your right wing people have a lot more branches that are loony than the left have. looking worse from your side than this one.

Who told you that I am right wing? I happen to think that all 'wings' are stupid

- Mrs. J -

the fact you think there's a loony left. plus you do come off as conservative.

maybe you're just misinformed? you don't seem that unintelligent though."

I am conservative in my behaviour, as much as one can be 'conservative' on a swingers website. But that is not my political leaning. At the moment, the loony right are in government

- Mrs. J -

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orum TrollWoman
over a year ago

•+• Access Denied •+•


"Racist, homophobic, ageist are overused terms. The loony left use these more frequently than a "good morning"

- Mrs. J -

..and in equal measure the racists, homophobes, ageists denounce their detractors by describing them as the 'loony left'. The cap may or may not fit in any group.

Nope; the loony left are exactly that; lunatics

Racist means when someone beats the crap out of someone else because they are a certain race or they are bar_ed from employment because of their race. Stating facts is *not* racist. That was just one example

Black people have a very different genetic makeup; so much so, that their eGFR needs to be multiplied by 1.21 to get meaningful data. The loony left will call that being racist as they are being treated differently

- Mrs. J -

racism is:

prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race is superior.

and the belief that all members of each race possess characteristics, abilities, or qualities specific to that race, especially so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to another race or races.

so, wtf? science creating more accurate results does not make anyone a loony. neither does being PC.

right wing, christian kkk are racist. right wing neo-nazis are too.

sorry but your right wing people have a lot more branches that are loony than the left have. looking worse from your side than this one.

Who told you that I am right wing? I happen to think that all 'wings' are stupid

- Mrs. J -

the fact you think there's a loony left. plus you do come off as conservative.

maybe you're just misinformed? you don't seem that unintelligent though.

I am conservative in my behaviour, as much as one can be 'conservative' on a swingers website. But that is not my political leaning. At the moment, the loony right are in government

- Mrs. J -"

yeah sorry. and even if someone has a personality type also doesn't mean they follow the politics.

like i'm quite liberal but don't think much of liberal parties.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *urchoicenowCouple
over a year ago

Ashford

With the people being responsible for the latest being 15&16, I personally think that the parents need to take some responsibility whatever colour they are.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

40 year jail sentence with the parents meeting the cost until they are 18 should do it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *igblackdomTV/TS
over a year ago

West Midlands


"

You are more than welcome to disagree

What is *your* definition of a racist?

On this site, I have read that a white person who does not want to have sex with a black person, is racist. Now is that the loony left or is that the far-loony-left?

- Mrs. J -"

To be honest I think it's very difficult to form a definitive view of what a racist, all of us are prone to subconcious bias affecting all kinds of different groups, so I guess it's how we acknowledge that when challenged that's important.

I certainly don't believe the anti-racist message is solely pedalled by the loony left, during my lifetime some of the most pernicious forms of racism I've encounte_ed have been propagated by individuals who would regard themselves as progressive socialists when in fact they hate everybody.

So to answer your final point-is it racist for a white person to not want to have sex with a black one?

Not in itself of course, however I personally wouldn't want to interact with anyone who had a narrow social view (whether black or white), by the same token I've received messages from the male of a couple asking to meet because their fetish is black men and their wife would 'never run off with one'..weird world isn't it?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hips n FursMan
over a year ago

Huddersfield

You can have a life sentence or 20 year sentence,until the judges start to implement the sentences,then they mean nothing. It's very,very rare a judge will use the full force of the law.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 15/07/17 17:27:05]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"You can have a life sentence or 20 year sentence,until the judges start to implement the sentences,then they mean nothing. It's very,very rare a judge will use the full force of the law."

Mitigation on the sentence is a good thing, gives judges the ability to factor in provocation or other relevant facts. Plus it makes sense to sentence for 10 expecting 5 with good behavior as it gives prisoners some motive to behave well while in prison.

In reality even a 2 month prison sentence is a potential life sentence to unemployment, social miss fit and reoffending. But it's the best we have.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"My grandson had some thrown at him on his way home one evening. Most of it missed fortunately. It's the weapon of the day and can be used from feet away, instead of close up, like a knife; which he's also been attacked with, as well as a baseball bat.

You thought of moving to a white neighbourhood? Or are the three aerious assaults on your grandson a small price to pay for being "diverse" and "inclusive"?

That a serious question??

Shit, silly racist me forgot acid, baseball bat and knife attacks are just as common in Richmond and Primrose Hill as they are in Barking and Mile End. Apologies.

Ffs.

So the point you're making is that if racially driven attacks are happening then you're advising the whites to get out and get to safety in a white area? Not, that perhaps we should stand up against racism?

Mmm. Part of the problem methinks.

I note you're not responding to my post....

I didn't say that were "racially driven", just stated the indisputable fact that they happen disproportionately in Asian/Black neighbourhoods, therefore living in one of these said neighbourhoods (I.e Barking, where the lady I was talking to lives) you are far more likely to be a victim. I never said it was Brown on White racism, most of these attacks are Asian on Asian or Black on Black, but obviously you're more likely to be caught up in it if you live in an area where it's happening a lot."

Probably has a lot more to do with it being a deprived area where yob/ gang culture is more often seen than it having anything to do with black / asians

In Scotland we call these people neds ... no matter what colour they are

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Racist, homophobic, ageist are overused terms. The loony left use these more frequently than a "good morning"

- Mrs. J -"

Well i if i listen to all the crap i read online my vote makes me right wing i believe? ... so can i say he is racist because im not a lefty? a term being over used does not mean it was wrong ... his post was racist ... nothing to do with the OP and has resulted in the whole thread being derailed

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"My grandson had some thrown at him on his way home one evening. Most of it missed fortunately. It's the weapon of the day and can be used from feet away, instead of close up, like a knife; which he's also been attacked with, as well as a baseball bat.

You thought of moving to a white neighbourhood? Or are the three aerious assaults on your grandson a small price to pay for being "diverse" and "inclusive"?"

Official record collected since 2010 do not include ethnicity of "perpetrators" and victims but do tell us that most are men, of those ethnicity was recorded were majority were white. Six in 10 were male, while 71% described their ethnic origin as white British, the figures show (white British, according to the 2011 census, accounts for 80% of the British population in England and Wales). Globally, an estimated 80% of victims are women.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icketysplitsWoman
over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound

I believe rushed changes to laws are often blunt, badly thought through and difficult to implement.

I think careful crafting is needed to ensure that the most corrosive acids are restricted but it won't be possible to restrict everything. I think the law should be used to its fullest to prosecute. But then I'm a bit left and that must make me a loony.

As to some of the nonsense above, I'm sure Resh Khan and her cousin wouldn't find moving to a whiter neighbourhood much comfort given the whiteness of their acid attacker.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *imiUKMan
over a year ago

Hereford

If someone repeatedly tells you you've lost an argument without bothering to address your points properly, the opposite is true.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"If someone repeatedly tells you you've lost an argument without bothering to address your points properly, the opposite is true."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


""Violent crime heat maps are racist!!!"

You look and sound familiar; haven't you been banned from here several times before?"

Yeah, he's gone from whinging about fat women to being racist. I'm wondering how he's going to reinvent himself next!?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


""Violent crime heat maps are racist!!!"

You look and sound familiar; haven't you been banned from here several times before?

Yeah, he's gone from whinging about fat women to being racist. I'm wondering how he's going to reinvent himself next!? "

He does certainly sound very bitter about life. Sigh...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *imiUKMan
over a year ago

Hereford


""Violent crime heat maps are racist!!!"

You look and sound familiar; haven't you been banned from here several times before?

Yeah, he's gone from whinging about fat women to being racist. I'm wondering how he's going to reinvent himself next!?

He does certainly sound very bitter about life. Sigh..."

I'm sure that a psychologist might have an interesting time ascertaining why a heterosexual man might come onto a website that facilitates the arrangement of casual sex and proceeds to render himself as unattractive as possible.....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Just followed all the messages from all you lovely people,all got your opinions and views wether its raciast,religion,gang culture or whatever

Me am from Liverpool,you make of life what ever way you decide,you basically get on with whoever lives either side or life gets hard but walking up to someone knowing you are about to throw acid into that persons face and look them in the eye while you perform such a horrific act is a no no,if they want to act inhuman then why should we,three square meals a day for forty years fuck that,i say cut off there fucking hands,wont throw acid again,queue the do gooders.....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rozacMan
over a year ago

london


" knowing you are about to throw acid into that persons face and look them in the eye while you perform such a horrific act is a no no,if they want to act inhuman then why should we,three square meals a day for forty years fuck that,i say cut off there fucking hands,wont throw acid again,queue the do gooders....."

Nope. They'd claim disability cheques because it would limit their ability to work.

I agree. I don't want to pay for them to be locked away. Capital punishment could be too extreme though if they are just young and foolish. Maybe castration?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Just followed all the messages from all you lovely people,all got your opinions and views wether its raciast,religion,gang culture or whatever

Me am from Liverpool,you make of life what ever way you decide,you basically get on with whoever lives either side or life gets hard but walking up to someone knowing you are about to throw acid into that persons face and look them in the eye while you perform such a horrific act is a no no,if they want to act inhuman then why should we,three square meals a day for forty years fuck that,i say cut off there fucking hands,wont throw acid again,queue the do gooders....."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top