FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

what a bunch of bankers

Jump to newest
 

By *leasureDome OP   Man
over a year ago

all over the place

Awwwwww poor bankers are suffering again lots of losses....

should we bail em out again maybe or just nationalise em ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *phroditeWoman
over a year ago

(She/ her) in Sensualityland

Which weary banker has upset you today ...;-)

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iewMan
Forum Mod
over a year ago

Angus & Findhorn

to pay for all the PPI claimants.

They will be coming forward in their droves

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *heplaysCouple
over a year ago

cheshire

Shoot em!!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ustyAngelWoman
over a year ago

gloucester


"Awwwwww poor bankers are suffering again lots of losses....

"

Not to there own pockets!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Funny how they're all posting losses now they're part govt own and will have to cough up if they make a profit. Weird that.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iewMan
Forum Mod
over a year ago

Angus & Findhorn

oops, the ones mis-sold PPI or people who have had good health and continuous employment and now want their money back

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atisfy janeWoman
over a year ago

Torquay

The thing is they often mis sold PPI to people that could never claim even if they were unable to work.....like Tens of Thousands of self employed people as highlighted in the FT the other day.

They were telling people that without taking out PPI they wouldn't be allowed a loan, even though a massive group were often not covered by the small print anyway....and would never be allowed to claim on the policy.

I think these customers should not only get their PPI payments back....but receive punative damages on top, that will teach these greedy banks not to rip people off in the future.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iewMan
Forum Mod
over a year ago

Angus & Findhorn


"The thing is they often mis sold PPI to people that could never claim even if they were unable to work.....like Tens of Thousands of self employed people as highlighted in the FT the other day.

They were telling people that without taking out PPI they wouldn't be allowed a loan, even though a massive group were often not covered by the small print anyway....and would never be allowed to claim on the policy.

I think these customers should not only get their PPI payments back....but receive punative damages on top, that will teach these greedy banks not to rip people off in the future.

"

defo agree a lot were mis-sold...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *leasureDome OP   Man
over a year ago

all over the place


"The thing is they often mis sold PPI to people that could never claim even if they were unable to work.....like Tens of Thousands of self employed people as highlighted in the FT the other day.

They were telling people that without taking out PPI they wouldn't be allowed a loan, even though a massive group were often not covered by the small print anyway....and would never be allowed to claim on the policy.

I think these customers should not only get their PPI payments back....but receive punative damages on top, that will teach these greedy banks not to rip people off in the future.

"

funny thing is sole owners of ltd companies can not claim on conventional company insurance if they are injured as they are responsible for health and safety. Brother in law found out when he lost an eye .

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ornyHorwichCpl aka HHCCouple
over a year ago

horwich

I am not for all this compensation culture as I work in the business and see all the bullsh*t claims that come in. It's such a farce that we think we can claim for everything because common sense no longer counts.

Saying that I have put a PPI claim in because it was missold to me. Sorry it wasn't sold to me it was automatically calulated and shuffled over and the options not explained

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *phroditeWoman
over a year ago

(She/ her) in Sensualityland


"I am not for all this compensation culture as I work in the business and see all the bullsh*t claims that come in. It's such a farce that we think we can claim for everything because common sense no longer counts.

Saying that I have put a PPI claim in because it was missold to me. Sorry it wasn't sold to me it was automatically calulated and shuffled over and the options not explained"

Actually I agree in a way with your statement on common sense and not always blaming others/ other things for one's lack of success.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ornyHorwichCpl aka HHCCouple
over a year ago

horwich

If a claims genuine then fair play it's those idiot ones that really get my goat.

Woman who sued Macdonalds because she got in a car, put her HOT cofee between her legs and spilt it and then claimed becuse the cup did not tell her it was hot. Now if she had asked for a frapachino then maybe.....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ENGUYMan
over a year ago

Hull

Amazingly, my bank (RBoS) is paying its employees bonuses this year, when they are also claiming "poverty".

It is my intention, once I get back into work, to have an IFA look at my financial affairs, and get out out of the mainstream banks.

There was a survey in my daily paper this week saying that the Big 5 banks do not offer the best options; smaller banks and building societies do!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"If a claims genuine then fair play it's those idiot ones that really get my goat.

Woman who sued Macdonalds because she got in a car, put her HOT cofee between her legs and spilt it and then claimed becuse the cup did not tell her it was hot. Now if she had asked for a frapachino then maybe....."

That McDonalds case really gets my goat, you wanna know why?

Because when you look into the case it was pretty bloody valid.

Yes the 79 year old woman did spill the coffee in her lap. But the claim wasn't because the cup didn't warn her it was hot coffee. It was because the coffee was so hot that it was unfit for human consumption. She had third degree burns over her thighs and groin. I remember reading that her labia was burnt bad enough that it ended up fused onto her groin.

Sorry, don't mean that as having a go at you! It's just one of those things that "grinds my gears".

On top of that I work for a bank as well!! In the IT end so nothing to do with the sorts of decisions that cause today's news.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *etillanteWoman
over a year ago

.

Ok if you were a small bank and one of the big banks came to you, would you give them an overdraught?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Awwwwww poor bankers are suffering again lots of losses....

should we bail em out again maybe or just nationalise em ?

"

Think i wanna marry one

corrrrrrrrr loaded or wot

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *obbytupperMan
over a year ago

Menston near Ilkley

Surprise, surprise the European finance minister is accused of fraud. Apparently transfering money from a state owned bank to a friend of President Sarkozy. FFS

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"If a claims genuine then fair play it's those idiot ones that really get my goat.

Woman who sued Macdonalds because she got in a car, put her HOT cofee between her legs and spilt it and then claimed becuse the cup did not tell her it was hot. Now if she had asked for a frapachino then maybe.....

That McDonalds case really gets my goat, you wanna know why?

Because when you look into the case it was pretty bloody valid.

Yes the 79 year old woman did spill the coffee in her lap. But the claim wasn't because the cup didn't warn her it was hot coffee. It was because the coffee was so hot that it was unfit for human consumption. She had third degree burns over her thighs and groin. I remember reading that her labia was burnt bad enough that it ended up fused onto her groin.

Sorry, don't mean that as having a go at you! It's just one of those things that "grinds my gears".

On top of that I work for a bank as well!! In the IT end so nothing to do with the sorts of decisions that cause today's news. "

Didn't McD's have to settle another claim of scalding from one of their hot apple pies some time ago?

It says its fecking hot in it's description so why buy one and then try and eat the damn thing straight away!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *umpkinMan
over a year ago

near the sounds of the wimborne quarter jack!


"If a claims genuine then fair play it's those idiot ones that really get my goat.

Woman who sued Macdonalds because she got in a car, put her HOT cofee between her legs and spilt it and then claimed becuse the cup did not tell her it was hot. Now if she had asked for a frapachino then maybe.....

That McDonalds case really gets my goat, you wanna know why?

Because when you look into the case it was pretty bloody valid.

Yes the 79 year old woman did spill the coffee in her lap. But the claim wasn't because the cup didn't warn her it was hot coffee. It was because the coffee was so hot that it was unfit for human consumption. She had third degree burns over her thighs and groin. I remember reading that her labia was burnt bad enough that it ended up fused onto her groin.

Sorry, don't mean that as having a go at you! It's just one of those things that "grinds my gears".

On top of that I work for a bank as well!! In the IT end so nothing to do with the sorts of decisions that cause today's news.

Didn't McD's have to settle another claim of scalding from one of their hot apple pies some time ago?

It says its fecking hot in it's description so why buy one and then try and eat the damn thing straight away!!"

There`s big difference in "hot" and "so bloody hot you`ll be lucky if you have a mouth left let alone any skin" but I do agree that a little common sense has to be taken. Perhaps you`ve noticed that the temperature of hot water in hotel rooms seems to be more acceptable these days. It`s not very bloody funny when washing your hands only for the water to suddenly become scalding hot when you least expect it!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"If a claims genuine then fair play it's those idiot ones that really get my goat.

Woman who sued Macdonalds because she got in a car, put her HOT cofee between her legs and spilt it and then claimed becuse the cup did not tell her it was hot. Now if she had asked for a frapachino then maybe.....

That McDonalds case really gets my goat, you wanna know why?

Because when you look into the case it was pretty bloody valid.

Yes the 79 year old woman did spill the coffee in her lap. But the claim wasn't because the cup didn't warn her it was hot coffee. It was because the coffee was so hot that it was unfit for human consumption. She had third degree burns over her thighs and groin. I remember reading that her labia was burnt bad enough that it ended up fused onto her groin.

Sorry, don't mean that as having a go at you! It's just one of those things that "grinds my gears".

On top of that I work for a bank as well!! In the IT end so nothing to do with the sorts of decisions that cause today's news.

Didn't McD's have to settle another claim of scalding from one of their hot apple pies some time ago?

It says its fecking hot in it's description so why buy one and then try and eat the damn thing straight away!!"

Blimey.

when they first come out i got burnt...now you say i could have sued the buggers....damn

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top