Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"More a Christian Fundamentalist in my book..." A fookin' nutter in mine | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"More a Christian Fundamentalist in my book... A fookin' nutter in mine " Is the same thing..... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"not sure it matters what he is or how he is labelled, it certainly doesn't matter he wrote some stuff down before he started his murdering rampage. He is a mass murderer, they all have their own justification for satisfying their urge to kill, this guys was just much more elaborate than most." It does matter, mores the pity, because smear tactics are being used to advance political objectives. Politicians, they pretty much live off the fears a population has. Look at all that damn money wasted on 'Terrorism'. And for what? You feel any safer in the world today? Perceptions matter because if they are incorrect we may make bad decisions as individuals or as a collective group. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" He clearly lacked the moral code that allows people to differentiate between what is the correct way to bring about change and achieving that same result via the slaughter of innocent people he percieved to be a future threat. " He had few qualms about killing socialists, but you'll notice that he was extremely specific with his targets. It is highly unlikely he would have killed anybody remotely supportive of his views, given the way he approached the bombing in Oslo and killing of the children on the island. That leads me to suspect he would be anguished if he hit the wrong target. As opposed to the London bombers or the attacks on the Twin Towers, which very likely killed a fair few Muslims in the process. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"More a Christian Fundamentalist in my book... A fookin' nutter in mine " ...and mine! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" He clearly lacked the moral code that allows people to differentiate between what is the correct way to bring about change and achieving that same result via the slaughter of innocent people he percieved to be a future threat. He had few qualms about killing socialists, but you'll notice that he was extremely specific with his targets. It is highly unlikely he would have killed anybody remotely supportive of his views, given the way he approached the bombing in Oslo and killing of the children on the island. That leads me to suspect he would be anguished if he hit the wrong target. As opposed to the London bombers or the attacks on the Twin Towers, which very likely killed a fair few Muslims in the process. " A terrorist's bomb has no way of insuring the people it kills are the people it was targetting. Similarly, he had no way of identifying which of those teenagers were Party activists and which were there simply for a good weekend with their mates. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"More a Christian Fundamentalist in my book... A fookin' nutter in mine " snap mate | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The youngest daughter of a Norwegian friend of mine was among those gunned down by this man. When I spoke to him over the telephone earlier today, he spoke, through his tears, about many things, such as the kind, gentle nature of his daughter, the fact that it would have been her birthday tomorrow, and that the present he had bought her lay unopened on the table in front of him. But he did not speak of whether or not her killer was a Nazi or a Christian fundamentalist and I doubt whether anyone else in his position would either. All he said about him was that he was inhuman. " and that is all that needs to be said in reality, who cares what 'cause' he did it for the fact is that so many families are without their loved ones because of him | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"should not be put on trial, just shoot him and save all the hassel" Absolutely, they have him bang to rights. Give him a bullet and save anguish for the murdered peoples families plus time and money! XXXX | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"should not be put on trial, just shoot him and save all the hassel" I'm quite sure that thought went through the minds of the armed response police who arrested him, seeing the evidence of what he had done all around them. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The youngest daughter of a Norwegian friend of mine was among those gunned down by this man. When I spoke to him over the telephone earlier today, he spoke, through his tears, about many things, such as the kind, gentle nature of his daughter, the fact that it would have been her birthday tomorrow, and that the present he had bought her lay unopened on the table in front of him. But he did not speak of whether or not her killer was a Nazi or a Christian fundamentalist and I doubt whether anyone else in his position would either. All he said about him was that he was inhuman. " Sorry to hear about your friend | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"should not be put on trial, just shoot him and save all the hassel Absolutely, they have him bang to rights. Give him a bullet and save anguish for the murdered peoples families plus time and money! XXXX" I disagree. Let him do hard time for the rest of his life and if he takes a savage beating from the other hardended crims on a daily basis then so be it. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"should not be put on trial, just shoot him and save all the hassel Absolutely, they have him bang to rights. Give him a bullet and save anguish for the murdered peoples families plus time and money! XXXX I disagree. Let him do hard time for the rest of his life and if he takes a savage beating from the other hardended crims on a daily basis then so be it. " You must be joking wishy, unfortunately. Try Googling "norway prison" with Google's image search. That's what's waiting for him. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"should not be put on trial, just shoot him and save all the hassel Absolutely, they have him bang to rights. Give him a bullet and save anguish for the murdered peoples families plus time and money! XXXX I disagree. Let him do hard time for the rest of his life and if he takes a savage beating from the other hardended crims on a daily basis then so be it. You must be joking wishy, unfortunately. Try Googling "norway prison" with Google's image search. That's what's waiting for him." Not only that, there is NO life sentence in Norway. The MAXIMUM he'll get for these atrocities under their current laws is 21 years! The Norwegians hadn't the need for long sentences: I think this awful episode will change that! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"your comparison of the nazi party and the young people is quite frankly obscene.. it did,nt happen 'then' and looking back through history and saying 'if this, if that' is not a logical argument. what next, if amy winehouse had been born decades ago and she and stalin had met up and overdosed together there would have been no mass slaughter in russia??? " What on earth are you talking about? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"your comparison of the nazi party and the young people is quite frankly obscene.. it did,nt happen 'then' and looking back through history and saying 'if this, if that' is not a logical argument. what next, if amy winehouse had been born decades ago and she and stalin had met up and overdosed together there would have been no mass slaughter in russia??? What on earth are you talking about?" thats what i was wondering about your previous posts tbh. your logic is flawed, the 'what if' points you make are puzzling. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why does everyone always bash the Nazis? They had excellent health-care, wonderful building programmes and education. Apart from a few "off" years and a couple of ill-advised policies, they were no different to most other modern governments." Not even remotely funny, a pretty moronic and pathetic attempt at irony. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why does everyone always bash the Nazis? They had excellent health-care, wonderful building programmes and education. Apart from a few "off" years and a couple of ill-advised policies, they were no different to most other modern governments. Not even remotely funny, a pretty moronic and pathetic attempt at irony." You obviously only have a limited knowledge of original national socialist policies then? There's more to history than John Wayne films you know! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why does everyone always bash the Nazis? They had excellent health-care, wonderful building programmes and education. Apart from a few "off" years and a couple of ill-advised policies, they were no different to most other modern governments. Not even remotely funny, a pretty moronic and pathetic attempt at irony." despite the fact that i think it was an attempt at bad taste humour and the comment made primarily to provoke a 'reaction', in all fairness some of what he said is actually true. the fact remains however that whatever accomplishments were made, they have been completely overshadowed (and quite rightly so) by the wider legacy - and that, as a subject, is a discussion far and beyond the remit of this forum | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"your comparison of the nazi party and the young people is quite frankly obscene.. it did,nt happen 'then' and looking back through history and saying 'if this, if that' is not a logical argument. what next, if amy winehouse had been born decades ago and she and stalin had met up and overdosed together there would have been no mass slaughter in russia??? What on earth are you talking about? thats what i was wondering about your previous posts tbh. your logic is flawed, the 'what if' points you make are puzzling. " Is this what you're referring to: "If Anders had murdered everyone at a Nazi Summer Camp, thus relieving the world of Hitler and his cohorts, we'd be laughing all the way to the bank and taking the view that any dead children were collateral damage for the 'greater good'." Because it'd be somewhat incredible if that were not true. Hardly a what-if scenario, closer to a statement of fact. I think you're over looking my main point in that post, which is that morality is entirely relative to your position. Incidents such as the recent one will always remain mysterious unless you can accept that. People are not evil, nor are they good. But of course it's entirely up to you what your opinion is on anything. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why does everyone always bash the Nazis? They had excellent health-care, wonderful building programmes and education. Apart from a few "off" years and a couple of ill-advised policies, they were no different to most other modern governments. Not even remotely funny, a pretty moronic and pathetic attempt at irony. despite the fact that i think it was an attempt at bad taste humour and the comment made primarily to provoke a 'reaction', in all fairness some of what he said is actually true. the fact remains however that whatever accomplishments were made, they have been completely overshadowed (and quite rightly so) by the wider legacy - and that, as a subject, is a discussion far and beyond the remit of this forum" one can hardly justify the mass slaughter of millions of innocent people because they had an effective transport system. the post was made to get a reaction yes, this type of 'fishing for reactions' on such subjects is usually by someone whose politics is extreme right and a sympathiser of such regimes. they just dont have the bollocks to come out and say so. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" In my opinion, having a military presence in unstable weak countries is not a war on terrorism its a desire to be controlling in affairs that dont really concern the welfare of the world as a whole, because the powers that be can get intelligence without this presence. The problem with a so called democratic and civilised country imposing its will on those living in the dark ages is a task that is stupid to undertake because the people of these countries will be ruled by tradition no matter how much we try to tell them how 'good' the way of the western developed world is compared to their way. You cannot show the way by destroying their culture mindset and tradition. " I agree completely with those two points, which more or less prevents me turning into a neo-conservative. I understand their thinking and agree with their aims, but disagree completely with the implementation. The West's soft power is dramatically more important than our hard power. Our soft power is highly non-obvious and non-trivial. If only Tony Blair had understood this. What a waste of life and money his actions have wrought. That prime minister damaged the country better than any terrorist could. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why does everyone always bash the Nazis? They had excellent health-care, wonderful building programmes and education. Apart from a few "off" years and a couple of ill-advised policies, they were no different to most other modern governments. Not even remotely funny, a pretty moronic and pathetic attempt at irony. despite the fact that i think it was an attempt at bad taste humour and the comment made primarily to provoke a 'reaction', in all fairness some of what he said is actually true. the fact remains however that whatever accomplishments were made, they have been completely overshadowed (and quite rightly so) by the wider legacy - and that, as a subject, is a discussion far and beyond the remit of this forum one can hardly justify the mass slaughter of millions of innocent people because they had an effective transport system. the post was made to get a reaction yes, this type of 'fishing for reactions' on such subjects is usually by someone whose politics is extreme right and a sympathiser of such regimes. they just dont have the bollocks to come out and say so. " You're being trolled. Trolling is nothing to do with the Right or Left. It's just that they're attracted to hot button topics like this one. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"your comparison of the nazi party and the young people is quite frankly obscene.. it did,nt happen 'then' and looking back through history and saying 'if this, if that' is not a logical argument. what next, if amy winehouse had been born decades ago and she and stalin had met up and overdosed together there would have been no mass slaughter in russia??? What on earth are you talking about? thats what i was wondering about your previous posts tbh. your logic is flawed, the 'what if' points you make are puzzling. Is this what you're referring to: "If Anders had murdered everyone at a Nazi Summer Camp, thus relieving the world of Hitler and his cohorts, we'd be laughing all the way to the bank and taking the view that any dead children were collateral damage for the 'greater good'." Because it'd be somewhat incredible if that were not true. Hardly a what-if scenario, closer to a statement of fact. I think you're over looking my main point in that post, which is that morality is entirely relative to your position. Incidents such as the recent one will always remain mysterious unless you can accept that. People are not evil, nor are they good. But of course it's entirely up to you what your opinion is on anything." how you can say that its a statement of fact is beyond me, its the flawed logic of if this had happened then that would not have happened. whilst recognising where you may be coming from i cant relate to how you have twisted this thread to bring in the links to the fascist regime of pre war germany. imho its an insult to the families still arranging the funerals of their children. as to the mystery of such incidents and people 'accepting such', i have dealt with such incidents and seen and smelt the consequences of the nutters who carried them out. please dont try and assume that your view of good and evil is shared by everyone, the nutter in Oslo is as evil as the rest that have gone before and sadly will occur again. there is no good at all in such people. again just my opinion | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why does everyone always bash the Nazis? They had excellent health-care, wonderful building programmes and education. Apart from a few "off" years and a couple of ill-advised policies, they were no different to most other modern governments. Not even remotely funny, a pretty moronic and pathetic attempt at irony. despite the fact that i think it was an attempt at bad taste humour and the comment made primarily to provoke a 'reaction', in all fairness some of what he said is actually true. the fact remains however that whatever accomplishments were made, they have been completely overshadowed (and quite rightly so) by the wider legacy - and that, as a subject, is a discussion far and beyond the remit of this forum one can hardly justify the mass slaughter of millions of innocent people because they had an effective transport system. the post was made to get a reaction yes, this type of 'fishing for reactions' on such subjects is usually by someone whose politics is extreme right and a sympathiser of such regimes. they just dont have the bollocks to come out and say so. You're being trolled. Trolling is nothing to do with the Right or Left. It's just that they're attracted to hot button topics like this one." why thank you for your insight lol, some trolls need to be told that their views are beyond the pale and not acceptable by the majority. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" If only Tony Blair had understood this. What a waste of life and money his actions have wrought. That prime minister damaged the country better than any terrorist could." agreed | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why does everyone always bash the Nazis? They had excellent health-care, wonderful building programmes and education. Apart from a few "off" years and a couple of ill-advised policies, they were no different to most other modern governments. Not even remotely funny, a pretty moronic and pathetic attempt at irony. despite the fact that i think it was an attempt at bad taste humour and the comment made primarily to provoke a 'reaction', in all fairness some of what he said is actually true. the fact remains however that whatever accomplishments were made, they have been completely overshadowed (and quite rightly so) by the wider legacy - and that, as a subject, is a discussion far and beyond the remit of this forum one can hardly justify the mass slaughter of millions of innocent people because they had an effective transport system. the post was made to get a reaction yes, this type of 'fishing for reactions' on such subjects is usually by someone whose politics is extreme right and a sympathiser of such regimes. they just dont have the bollocks to come out and say so. " can i just say for the record that if my views were to the extreme, i would have the bollocks to stand up and be counted. at no point was i trying to compare welfare systems, transport or architecture to genocide hence why my response was worded to that effect. what occurred between 1933 & 1945 is unjustifiable under anything but the the most extreme mindset - as is the neo nazi subculture that pervades in much of Eastern Europe to this day | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Am surprised why no one is calling him a 'terrorist'. I think they would have done so if he had brown skin and an asian name though. " i think you have a valid point | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Am surprised why no one is calling him a 'terrorist'. I think they would have done so if he had brown skin and an asian name though. " He's a terrorist.....make you feel any better? If you watch the Sky coverage in Oslo today the Norwegians interviewed have often reffered to him as a 'terrorist'. So you can sleep easier knowing that. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Am surprised why no one is calling him a 'terrorist'. I think they would have done so if he had brown skin and an asian name though. He's a terrorist.....make you feel any better? If you watch the Sky coverage in Oslo today the Norwegians interviewed have often reffered to him as a 'terrorist'. So you can sleep easier knowing that." i have rarely seen anyone who can convey venom in the written word to such a degree jane. sometimes, i think you are justified, sometimes you have had me crying laughing but there's no need to lay into the lad like that surely ! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Am surprised why no one is calling him a 'terrorist'. I think they would have done so if he had brown skin and an asian name though. He's a terrorist.....make you feel any better? If you watch the Sky coverage in Oslo today the Norwegians interviewed have often reffered to him as a 'terrorist'. So you can sleep easier knowing that." Thanks. I will sleep well tonight | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Am surprised why no one is calling him a 'terrorist'. I think they would have done so if he had brown skin and an asian name though. He's a terrorist.....make you feel any better? If you watch the Sky coverage in Oslo today the Norwegians interviewed have often reffered to him as a 'terrorist'. So you can sleep easier knowing that. i have rarely seen anyone who can convey venom in the written word to such a degree jane. sometimes, i think you are justified, sometimes you have had me crying laughing but there's no need to lay into the lad like that surely !" I disagree with anyone trying to play the race card with regards to something as terrible as these killings....all you have to do is listen to what Norwegians are saying on TV interviews, and lets face it it's their personal grief which should be foremost in our minds, not the British tabloid press headlines. The Norwegians constantly refer to this a terrorist act....that's who I listen to, not someone trying to make racial points over the issue. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Am surprised why no one is calling him a 'terrorist'. I think they would have done so if he had brown skin and an asian name though. " He's been referred to as that, but yes I totally agree - a lot of people stereotype certain races... same as in movies or dramas spies always seem to have a russian accent... I wouldnt let stereotypes worry you - apparently being geordie I have a whippet and my boyfriend is Gazza. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Am surprised why no one is calling him a 'terrorist'. I think they would have done so if he had brown skin and an asian name though. He's a terrorist.....make you feel any better? If you watch the Sky coverage in Oslo today the Norwegians interviewed have often reffered to him as a 'terrorist'. So you can sleep easier knowing that. i have rarely seen anyone who can convey venom in the written word to such a degree jane. sometimes, i think you are justified, sometimes you have had me crying laughing but there's no need to lay into the lad like that surely ! I disagree with anyone trying to play the race card with regards to something as terrible as these killings....all you have to do is listen to what Norwegians are saying on TV interviews, and lets face it it's their personal grief which should be foremost in our minds, not the British tabloid press headlines. The Norwegians constantly refer to this a terrorist act....that's who I listen to, not someone trying to make racial points over the issue." although i can see where you think where the 'race card' has been played, his point does have some credence though i bet most people would rush to say 'oh no, not me' if asked they thought it was an islamic terror attack when the news was initially breaking (before the first facts were known) - whereas in their heart of hearts, they know that's exactly what they thought i am ashamed to say i include myself in that group too | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" although i can see where you think where the 'race card' has been played, his point does have some credence though i bet most people would rush to say 'oh no, not me' if asked they thought it was an islamic terror attack when the news was initially breaking (before the first facts were known) - whereas in their heart of hearts, they know that's exactly what they thought i am ashamed to say i include myself in that group too " I thought that but Im not ashamed of it being my first thought. These days had it happened in the uk I might have thought 'the troubles' as these are rearing their ugly head again..... My second thought was In Norway - what on earth would that country be terrorised for? We do naturally stereotype consciously or subconciously | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" The Daily Mail reported that the Oslo terrorist is an anti-Muslim extremist who posts lunatic right-wing nonsense on the Internet. And they printed that without a hint of irony " American news reported it as the 'Twin attacks on Oslo' so they were happy to regurgitate that phrase and apply it to the Norwegian attacks.... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" The Daily Mail reported that the Oslo terrorist is an anti-Muslim extremist who posts lunatic right-wing nonsense on the Internet. And they printed that without a hint of irony American news reported it as the 'Twin attacks on Oslo' so they were happy to regurgitate that phrase and apply it to the Norwegian attacks...." The Americans are being particularly moronic these days. I for one, would be positively delighted if Glenn Beck 'got a cap in his ass'. I'm home with the downies [sic]. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |