Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to The Lounge |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Do you think it should be compulsory to join this site? The number of illiterate men on this site is staggering - Mrs. J -" not compulsory but it can be annoying | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Illiterate or illegitimate? Lol I hope I'm neither! " Illegitimate does not bother us 
- Mrs. J - | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Illiterate or illegitimate? Lol I hope I'm neither! Illegitimate does not bother us
- Mrs. J -"just tall and literate with a polite demeanor | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Illiterate or illegitimate? Lol I hope I'm neither! Illegitimate does not bother us
- Mrs. J -just tall and literate with a polite demeanor"Does't have to as tall as my husband. As short as 6' will do But he will have to be able to read to know that - Mrs. J - | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Illiterate or illegitimate? Lol I hope I'm neither! Illegitimate does not bother us
- Mrs. J -just tall and literate with a polite demeanor
Does't have to as tall as my husband. As short as 6' will do
But he will have to be able to read to know that
- Mrs. J -"I knew that because I had read | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| Reply privately |
" The number of illiterate men on this site is staggering - Mrs. J -" That's not as many as the people that point it out. It balances it out really.  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Illiterate or illegitimate? Lol I hope I'm neither! Illegitimate does not bother us
- Mrs. J -just tall and literate with a polite demeanor
Does't have to as tall as my husband. As short as 6' will do
But he will have to be able to read to know that
- Mrs. J -I knew that because I had read "I know
Wish a few more could read too
- Mrs. J - | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" The number of illiterate men on this site is staggering - Mrs. J - That's not as many as the people that point it out. It balances it out really. "Oh, you'd be surprised - Mrs. J - | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" The number of illiterate men on this site is staggering - Mrs. J - That's not as many as the people that point it out. It balances it out really.
Oh, you'd be surprised
- Mrs. J -"I bet I wouldn't. Nothing on here surprising me anymore. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Illiterate or illegitimate? Lol I hope I'm neither! Illegitimate does not bother us
- Mrs. J -just tall and literate with a polite demeanor
Does't have to as tall as my husband. As short as 6' will do
But he will have to be able to read to know that
- Mrs. J -I knew that because I had read
I know
Wish a few more could read too
- Mrs. J -"much of this is cut to the chase unfortunately because certainly from the guys end 90% of messages even well thought out and penned from profile write up dont get read or replied to and quite often you may have spoken to the woman or couple concerned before | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Illiterate or illegitimate? Lol I hope I'm neither! Illegitimate does not bother us
- Mrs. J -"Lol, runs off to find birth certificate  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Illiterate or illegitimate? Lol I hope I'm neither! Illegitimate does not bother us
- Mrs. J -just tall and literate with a polite demeanor
Does't have to as tall as my husband. As short as 6' will do
But he will have to be able to read to know that
- Mrs. J -I knew that because I had read
I know
Wish a few more could read too
- Mrs. J -much of this is cut to the chase unfortunately because certainly from the guys end 90% of messages even well thought out and penned from profile write up dont get read or replied to and quite often you may have spoken to the woman or couple concerned before "We always reply to guys who have read our profile and meet our preferences; that is why we are here; to meet with people who we will find attractive and who will find us attractive So far, in all the messages we have received (and we have received quite a few) there have only been two who did read! That brings the literacy rate down to less than 1%; not good - Mrs. J - | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Illiterate or illegitimate? Lol I hope I'm neither! Illegitimate does not bother us
- Mrs. J -just tall and literate with a polite demeanor
Does't have to as tall as my husband. As short as 6' will do
But he will have to be able to read to know that
- Mrs. J -I knew that because I had read
I know
Wish a few more could read too
- Mrs. J -much of this is cut to the chase unfortunately because certainly from the guys end 90% of messages even well thought out and penned from profile write up dont get read or replied to and quite often you may have spoken to the woman or couple concerned before "Exactly. I'm not everyone's cup of tea so me writing out an essay on here is pointless and tbh writing out something is very pointless when people judge someone within 9 secs of seeing them and I don't care what anyone says everything here is based on if looks are pleasing to people. I get more action on a night out or at a club where in person I look far better then any pictures of me lol. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Illiterate or illegitimate? Lol I hope I'm neither! Illegitimate does not bother us
- Mrs. J -just tall and literate with a polite demeanor
Does't have to as tall as my husband. As short as 6' will do
But he will have to be able to read to know that
- Mrs. J -I knew that because I had read
I know
Wish a few more could read too
- Mrs. J -much of this is cut to the chase unfortunately because certainly from the guys end 90% of messages even well thought out and penned from profile write up dont get read or replied to and quite often you may have spoken to the woman or couple concerned before
We always reply to guys who have read our profile and meet our preferences; that is why we are here; to meet with people who we will find attractive and who will find us attractive
So far, in all the messages we have received (and we have received quite a few) there have only been two who did read! That brings the literacy rate down to less than 1%; not good
- Mrs. J -"well sometimes I think meeting achieves more than reading but I understand where youre coming from ,the process has to start somewhere I always read profile unless they are exceptionally long and demanding | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Illiterate or illegitimate? Lol I hope I'm neither! Illegitimate does not bother us
- Mrs. J -
Lol, runs off to find birth certificate "Off-topic; by the way, nice photograph - Mrs. J - | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Illiterate or illegitimate? Lol I hope I'm neither! Illegitimate does not bother us
- Mrs. J -just tall and literate with a polite demeanor
Does't have to as tall as my husband. As short as 6' will do
But he will have to be able to read to know that
- Mrs. J -I knew that because I had read
I know
Wish a few more could read too
- Mrs. J -much of this is cut to the chase unfortunately because certainly from the guys end 90% of messages even well thought out and penned from profile write up dont get read or replied to and quite often you may have spoken to the woman or couple concerned before
Exactly. I'm not everyone's cup of tea so me writing out an essay on here is pointless and tbh writing out something is very pointless when people judge someone within 9 secs of seeing them and I don't care what anyone says everything here is based on if looks are pleasing to people.
I get more action on a night out or at a club where in person I look far better then any pictures of me lol."yes I know exactly what youre saying to | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Illiterate or illegitimate? Lol I hope I'm neither! Illegitimate does not bother us
- Mrs. J -just tall and literate with a polite demeanor
Does't have to as tall as my husband. As short as 6' will do
But he will have to be able to read to know that
- Mrs. J -I knew that because I had read
I know
Wish a few more could read too
- Mrs. J -much of this is cut to the chase unfortunately because certainly from the guys end 90% of messages even well thought out and penned from profile write up dont get read or replied to and quite often you may have spoken to the woman or couple concerned before
We always reply to guys who have read our profile and meet our preferences; that is why we are here; to meet with people who we will find attractive and who will find us attractive
So far, in all the messages we have received (and we have received quite a few) there have only been two who did read! That brings the literacy rate down to less than 1%; not good
- Mrs. J -well sometimes I think meeting achieves more than reading but I understand where youre coming from ,the process has to start somewhere I always read profile unless they are exceptionally long and demanding "Exactly. We are only going to arrange a meeting in a club, if there is mutual attraction A guy wishing to meet a red-head or brunette is not going to be attracted to me as I am not going to be attracted to a guy in his 50s. Either one of us writing to the other is a complete waste of time - Mrs. J - | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Illiterate or illegitimate? Lol I hope I'm neither! Illegitimate does not bother us
- Mrs. J -just tall and literate with a polite demeanor
Does't have to as tall as my husband. As short as 6' will do
But he will have to be able to read to know that
- Mrs. J -I knew that because I had read
I know
Wish a few more could read too
- Mrs. J -much of this is cut to the chase unfortunately because certainly from the guys end 90% of messages even well thought out and penned from profile write up dont get read or replied to and quite often you may have spoken to the woman or couple concerned before
We always reply to guys who have read our profile and meet our preferences; that is why we are here; to meet with people who we will find attractive and who will find us attractive
So far, in all the messages we have received (and we have received quite a few) there have only been two who did read! That brings the literacy rate down to less than 1%; not good
- Mrs. J -well sometimes I think meeting achieves more than reading but I understand where youre coming from ,the process has to start somewhere I always read profile unless they are exceptionally long and demanding
Exactly. We are only going to arrange a meeting in a club, if there is mutual attraction
A guy wishing to meet a red-head or brunette is not going to be attracted to me as I am not going to be attracted to a guy in his 50s. Either one of us writing to the other is a complete waste of time
- Mrs. J -"I get that to but and ive had this recently I asked for a pic to see if their was mutual attraction I always provide mine and the retort was you must be extremely shallow if you require a pic to have a meet over a coffee | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Illiterate or illegitimate? Lol I hope I'm neither! Illegitimate does not bother us
- Mrs. J -just tall and literate with a polite demeanor
Does't have to as tall as my husband. As short as 6' will do
But he will have to be able to read to know that
- Mrs. J -I knew that because I had read
I know
Wish a few more could read too
- Mrs. J -much of this is cut to the chase unfortunately because certainly from the guys end 90% of messages even well thought out and penned from profile write up dont get read or replied to and quite often you may have spoken to the woman or couple concerned before
We always reply to guys who have read our profile and meet our preferences; that is why we are here; to meet with people who we will find attractive and who will find us attractive
So far, in all the messages we have received (and we have received quite a few) there have only been two who did read! That brings the literacy rate down to less than 1%; not good
- Mrs. J -well sometimes I think meeting achieves more than reading but I understand where youre coming from ,the process has to start somewhere I always read profile unless they are exceptionally long and demanding
Exactly. We are only going to arrange a meeting in a club, if there is mutual attraction
A guy wishing to meet a red-head or brunette is not going to be attracted to me as I am not going to be attracted to a guy in his 50s. Either one of us writing to the other is a complete waste of time
- Mrs. J -I get that to but and ive had this recently I asked for a pic to see if their was mutual attraction I always provide mine and the retort was you must be extremely shallow if you require a pic to have a meet over a coffee "I don't think it is shallow for asking for a photograph Personally, I woudn't send one; we've got some photographs on our profile where the faces are blurred but it does give the reader some idea Anyway, moot point now as we have just changed our profile. It is just too much hard work to sift through messages from unsuitable men here - Mrs. J - | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Illiterate or illegitimate? Lol I hope I'm neither! Illegitimate does not bother us
- Mrs. J -just tall and literate with a polite demeanor
Does't have to as tall as my husband. As short as 6' will do
But he will have to be able to read to know that
- Mrs. J -I knew that because I had read
I know
Wish a few more could read too
- Mrs. J -much of this is cut to the chase unfortunately because certainly from the guys end 90% of messages even well thought out and penned from profile write up dont get read or replied to and quite often you may have spoken to the woman or couple concerned before
We always reply to guys who have read our profile and meet our preferences; that is why we are here; to meet with people who we will find attractive and who will find us attractive
So far, in all the messages we have received (and we have received quite a few) there have only been two who did read! That brings the literacy rate down to less than 1%; not good
- Mrs. J -well sometimes I think meeting achieves more than reading but I understand where youre coming from ,the process has to start somewhere I always read profile unless they are exceptionally long and demanding
Exactly. We are only going to arrange a meeting in a club, if there is mutual attraction
A guy wishing to meet a red-head or brunette is not going to be attracted to me as I am not going to be attracted to a guy in his 50s. Either one of us writing to the other is a complete waste of time
- Mrs. J -I get that to but and ive had this recently I asked for a pic to see if their was mutual attraction I always provide mine and the retort was you must be extremely shallow if you require a pic to have a meet over a coffee
I don't think it is shallow for asking for a photograph
Personally, I woudn't send one; we've got some photographs on our profile where the faces are blurred but it does give the reader some idea
Anyway, moot point now as we have just changed our profile. It is just too much hard work to sift through messages from unsuitable men here
- Mrs. J -"ha I am a 100% genuine illiterate twat can't see that working good luck though | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Good luck to you too. We have requested for this thread to be closed as the topic no longer interests us - Mrs. J -" they will do it in morning probably ,later in morning I meant | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Do you think it should be compulsory to join this site? The number of illiterate men on this site is staggering - Mrs. J -" If I was you I'd check my own profile before writing a post such as that  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Good luck to you too. We have requested for this thread to be closed as the topic no longer interests us - Mrs. J -" Can we do that? Ask for a thread to be closed when we personally get bored of it? What if others want to contribute? I wish I knew that ages ago, particularly when threads I've started go off at wild tangents!
In fact, can we do it on threads that we HAVEN'T started too? The site would be a much better place if all threads were closed that no longer interested me! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Good luck to you too. We have requested for this thread to be closed as the topic no longer interests us - Mrs. J - Can we do that? Ask for a thread to be closed when we personally get bored of it? What if others want to contribute? I wish I knew that ages ago, particularly when threads I've started go off at wild tangents!
In fact, can we do it on threads that we HAVEN'T started too? The site would be a much better place if all threads were closed that no longer interested me! "Mods? Can we close Dans Profile?  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Good luck to you too. We have requested for this thread to be closed as the topic no longer interests us - Mrs. J - Can we do that? Ask for a thread to be closed when we personally get bored of it? What if others want to contribute? I wish I knew that ages ago, particularly when threads I've started go off at wild tangents!
In fact, can we do it on threads that we HAVEN'T started too? The site would be a much better place if all threads were closed that no longer interested me!
Mods? Can we close Dans Profile? "  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Do you think it should be compulsory to join this site? The number of illiterate men on this site is staggering - Mrs. J -" not everyone has the gift of words. And it's a swinging site not scrabble club. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
 | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Do you think it should be compulsory to join this site? The number of illiterate men on this site is staggering - Mrs. J -not everyone has the gift of words. And it's a swinging site not scrabble club." A gift of words. These idiots cant read; A 5'6", tubby guy in his 50s writing to me when I am looking for someone similar to my husband and say so on my profile hasn't read a word 
Anyways, we have solved the problem by blocking singe men from contacting us
- Mrs. J - | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Do you think it should be compulsory to join this site? The number of illiterate men on this site is staggering - Mrs. J - If I was you I'd check my own profile before writing a post such as that "Where did I ask you to read my profile and advise us on it???
That is what I meant about illiteracy; some folk can't even read the site FAQs properly
- Mrs. J - | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Op u ever thought that sometimes it's not the person typing the message but the device they're using that may be at fault ie it autocorrects or changes words it thinks should be more suitable or if like me they type too fast and skip letters or just hit wrong one " If you read the posts then you will know that it isn't about spelling or grammar but about single men not reading profiles but nevertheless, sending messages How on earth can a bisexual, 5'10, with a beer belly, non-Caucasian, married man meet my requirements of a straight, Caucasian, 6' or over, fit single man? Clearly he cannot understand words. This is just an example Anyway; I have enough of these silly messages here so we have blocked them. We go often enough to clubs and will strike up a conversation with a single man if there is one who meets our preferences. Otherwise, we will just keep on meeting with couples and single women - Mrs. J - | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Shit I misspelt only get the cuffs " Wrist and ankle ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Shit I misspelt only get the cuffs Wrist and ankle ? "u choose | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
- Mrs. J - | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"This thread proves my point of folk not being able to read properly
- Mrs. J -"Well I haven't got my reading glasses on yet so I'm holding the phone 3 ft away. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Op u ever thought that sometimes it's not the person typing the message but the device they're using that may be at fault ie it autocorrects or changes words it thinks should be more suitable or if like me they type too fast and skip letters or just hit wrong one If you read the posts then you will know that it isn't about spelling or grammar but about single men not reading profiles but nevertheless, sending messages How on earth can a bisexual, 5'10, with a beer belly, non-Caucasian, married man meet my requirements of a straight, Caucasian, 6' or over, fit single man? Clearly he cannot understand words. This is just an example Anyway; I have enough of these silly messages here so we have blocked them. We go often enough to clubs and will strike up a conversation with a single man if there is one who meets our preferences. Otherwise, we will just keep on meeting with couples and single women - Mrs. J -" but your post states there's a lot of illiterate people on site as in they're grasp of the written word is poor not that their grasp of what you desire is not being acknowledged or it seems that is what everyone here is responding too so maybe the way you put your point across needs to be addressed | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"This thread proves my point of folk not being able to read properly
- Mrs. J -
Well I haven't got my reading glasses on yet so I'm holding the phone 3 ft away. "glasses from Reading in Berkshire? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Nope this thread proves that you are not as educated as your making out op sorry but it's a fact" you've got us banned from messaging them now ,see what you've done | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"This thread proves my point of folk not being able to read properly
- Mrs. J -
Well I haven't got my reading glasses on yet so I'm holding the phone 3 ft away. glasses from Reading in Berkshire?"When I can read I'll check the label. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Nope this thread proves that you are not as educated as your making out op sorry but it's a factyou've got us banned from messaging them now ,see what you've done " well she probably wouldn't talk to someone as inferior as us for real | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
Actually mods: this thread now 'no longer interests' me either, can we indeed please now close it? Thank you. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"This thread proves my point of folk not being able to read properly
- Mrs. J -
Well I haven't got my reading glasses on yet so I'm holding the phone 3 ft away. glasses from Reading in Berkshire?
When I can read I'll check the label.
"so what restraints u got in your bedside draws miss  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"... If you read the posts then you will know that it isn't about spelling or grammar but about single men not reading profiles but nevertheless, sending messages How on earth can a bisexual, 5'10, with a beer belly, non-Caucasian, married man meet my requirements of a straight, Caucasian, 6' or over, fit single man? Clearly he cannot understand words. This is just an example Anyway; I have enough of these silly messages here so we have blocked them. We go often enough to clubs and will strike up a conversation with a single man if there is one who meets our preferences. Otherwise, we will just keep on meeting with couples and single women - Mrs. J -but your post states there's a lot of illiterate people on site as in they're grasp of the written word is poor not that their grasp of what you desire is not being acknowledged or it seems that is what everyone here is responding too so maybe the way you put your point across needs to be addressed " They either cannot read or are rude enough to ignore each and every one of our preferences; take your pick And later posts, within a few minutes, explained the context; folk still didn'tt read that and went on to 'scrabbie', deslexia, autocorrect ..... One went as far as pointing out our profile. He hadn't read anything; not even the site FAQs - Mrs. J - | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"... If you read the posts then you will know that it isn't about spelling or grammar but about single men not reading profiles but nevertheless, sending messages How on earth can a bisexual, 5'10, with a beer belly, non-Caucasian, married man meet my requirements of a straight, Caucasian, 6' or over, fit single man? Clearly he cannot understand words. This is just an example Anyway; I have enough of these silly messages here so we have blocked them. We go often enough to clubs and will strike up a conversation with a single man if there is one who meets our preferences. Otherwise, we will just keep on meeting with couples and single women - Mrs. J -but your post states there's a lot of illiterate people on site as in they're grasp of the written word is poor not that their grasp of what you desire is not being acknowledged or it seems that is what everyone here is responding too so maybe the way you put your point across needs to be addressed They either cannot read or are rude enough to ignore each and every one of our preferences; take your pick And later posts, within a few minutes, explained the context; folk still didn'tt read that and went on to 'scrabbie', deslexia, autocorrect ..... One went as far as pointing out our profile. He hadn't read anything; not even the site FAQs - Mrs. J -" but that's not illiteracy that's ignorance two very different things | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"This thread proves my point of folk not being able to read properly
- Mrs. J -
Well I haven't got my reading glasses on yet so I'm holding the phone 3 ft away. glasses from Reading in Berkshire?
When I can read I'll check the label.
"ok I can give lessons you know x | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I'm sure plenty of the unsuitable guys are perfectly literate, they are just either not reading the profile or choosing to ignore the contents. "  I think that makes too much sense though. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"... If you read the posts then you will know that it isn't about spelling or grammar but about single men not reading profiles but nevertheless, sending messages How on earth can a bisexual, 5'10, with a beer belly, non-Caucasian, married man meet my requirements of a straight, Caucasian, 6' or over, fit single man? Clearly he cannot understand words. This is just an example Anyway; I have enough of these silly messages here so we have blocked them. We go often enough to clubs and will strike up a conversation with a single man if there is one who meets our preferences. Otherwise, we will just keep on meeting with couples and single women - Mrs. J -but your post states there's a lot of illiterate people on site as in they're grasp of the written word is poor not that their grasp of what you desire is not being acknowledged or it seems that is what everyone here is responding too so maybe the way you put your point across needs to be addressed They either cannot read or are rude enough to ignore each and every one of our preferences; take your pick And later posts, within a few minutes, explained the context; folk still didn'tt read that and went on to 'scrabbie', deslexia, autocorrect ..... One went as far as pointing out our profile. He hadn't read anything; not even the site FAQs - Mrs. J -but that's not illiteracy that's ignorance two very different things " How do I know if he is illiterate or just plain rude? Anyways guys, I can't be bothered anymore; have fun here
- Mrs. J - | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"... If you read the posts then you will know that it isn't about spelling or grammar but about single men not reading profiles but nevertheless, sending messages How on earth can a bisexual, 5'10, with a beer belly, non-Caucasian, married man meet my requirements of a straight, Caucasian, 6' or over, fit single man? Clearly he cannot understand words. This is just an example Anyway; I have enough of these silly messages here so we have blocked them. We go often enough to clubs and will strike up a conversation with a single man if there is one who meets our preferences. Otherwise, we will just keep on meeting with couples and single women - Mrs. J -but your post states there's a lot of illiterate people on site as in they're grasp of the written word is poor not that their grasp of what you desire is not being acknowledged or it seems that is what everyone here is responding too so maybe the way you put your point across needs to be addressed They either cannot read or are rude enough to ignore each and every one of our preferences; take your pick And later posts, within a few minutes, explained the context; folk still didn'tt read that and went on to 'scrabbie', deslexia, autocorrect ..... One went as far as pointing out our profile. He hadn't read anything; not even the site FAQs - Mrs. J -" but the ignorant and illiterate couples and women survived that's where I'm struggling to understand your philosophy | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Well this is nice isn't it
Actually mods: this thread now 'no longer interests' me either, can we indeed please now close it? Thank you. "I didn't know it worked like that. I'm going to close so many threads today | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"If he is illiterate he will probably misspell words if ride he will insult u simple" think youre missing the point | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"... If you read the posts then you will know that it isn't about spelling or grammar but about single men not reading profiles but nevertheless, sending messages How on earth can a bisexual, 5'10, with a beer belly, non-Caucasian, married man meet my requirements of a straight, Caucasian, 6' or over, fit single man? Clearly he cannot understand words. This is just an example Anyway; I have enough of these silly messages here so we have blocked them. We go often enough to clubs and will strike up a conversation with a single man if there is one who meets our preferences. Otherwise, we will just keep on meeting with couples and single women - Mrs. J -but your post states there's a lot of illiterate people on site as in they're grasp of the written word is poor not that their grasp of what you desire is not being acknowledged or it seems that is what everyone here is responding too so maybe the way you put your point across needs to be addressed They either cannot read or are rude enough to ignore each and every one of our preferences; take your pick And later posts, within a few minutes, explained the context; folk still didn'tt read that and went on to 'scrabbie', deslexia, autocorrect ..... One went as far as pointing out our profile. He hadn't read anything; not even the site FAQs - Mrs. J -but the ignorant and illiterate couples and women survived that's where I'm struggling to understand your philosophy" They did not as our preferences for them are much more relaxed and I am not going to justify to anyone here why our preferences for them are more relaxed. You didn't read, did you?
- Mrs. J - | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Well this is nice isn't it
Actually mods: this thread now 'no longer interests' me either, can we indeed please now close it? Thank you.
I didn't know it worked like that. I'm going to close so many threads today "bet you don't lol | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"... If you read the posts then you will know that it isn't about spelling or grammar but about single men not reading profiles but nevertheless, sending messages How on earth can a bisexual, 5'10, with a beer belly, non-Caucasian, married man meet my requirements of a straight, Caucasian, 6' or over, fit single man? Clearly he cannot understand words. This is just an example Anyway; I have enough of these silly messages here so we have blocked them. We go often enough to clubs and will strike up a conversation with a single man if there is one who meets our preferences. Otherwise, we will just keep on meeting with couples and single women - Mrs. J -but your post states there's a lot of illiterate people on site as in they're grasp of the written word is poor not that their grasp of what you desire is not being acknowledged or it seems that is what everyone here is responding too so maybe the way you put your point across needs to be addressed They either cannot read or are rude enough to ignore each and every one of our preferences; take your pick And later posts, within a few minutes, explained the context; folk still didn'tt read that and went on to 'scrabbie', deslexia, autocorrect ..... One went as far as pointing out our profile. He hadn't read anything; not even the site FAQs - Mrs. J -" Is this a whole take the pee thread because illiteracy isn't about preferences on profiles. Unless I am reading the definition wrong. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"... If you read the posts then you will know that it isn't about spelling or grammar but about single men not reading profiles but nevertheless, sending messages How on earth can a bisexual, 5'10, with a beer belly, non-Caucasian, married man meet my requirements of a straight, Caucasian, 6' or over, fit single man? Clearly he cannot understand words. This is just an example Anyway; I have enough of these silly messages here so we have blocked them. We go often enough to clubs and will strike up a conversation with a single man if there is one who meets our preferences. Otherwise, we will just keep on meeting with couples and single women - Mrs. J -but your post states there's a lot of illiterate people on site as in they're grasp of the written word is poor not that their grasp of what you desire is not being acknowledged or it seems that is what everyone here is responding too so maybe the way you put your point across needs to be addressed They either cannot read or are rude enough to ignore each and every one of our preferences; take your pick And later posts, within a few minutes, explained the context; folk still didn'tt read that and went on to 'scrabbie', deslexia, autocorrect ..... One went as far as pointing out our profile. He hadn't read anything; not even the site FAQs - Mrs. J -but the ignorant and illiterate couples and women survived that's where I'm struggling to understand your philosophy They did not as our preferences for them are much more relaxed and I am not going to justify to anyone here why our preferences for them are more relaxed. You didn't read, did you?
- Mrs. J -"your thread at the start states should there be a test for literacy to join this site nothing stating that people should read and understand your requirements to be able to join two very different things | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"... If you read the posts then you will know that it isn't about spelling or grammar but about single men not reading profiles but nevertheless, sending messages How on earth can a bisexual, 5'10, with a beer belly, non-Caucasian, married man meet my requirements of a straight, Caucasian, 6' or over, fit single man? Clearly he cannot understand words. This is just an example Anyway; I have enough of these silly messages here so we have blocked them. We go often enough to clubs and will strike up a conversation with a single man if there is one who meets our preferences. Otherwise, we will just keep on meeting with couples and single women - Mrs. J -but your post states there's a lot of illiterate people on site as in they're grasp of the written word is poor not that their grasp of what you desire is not being acknowledged or it seems that is what everyone here is responding too so maybe the way you put your point across needs to be addressed They either cannot read or are rude enough to ignore each and every one of our preferences; take your pick And later posts, within a few minutes, explained the context; folk still didn'tt read that and went on to 'scrabbie', deslexia, autocorrect ..... One went as far as pointing out our profile. He hadn't read anything; not even the site FAQs - Mrs. J -but the ignorant and illiterate couples and women survived that's where I'm struggling to understand your philosophy They did not as our preferences for them are much more relaxed and I am not going to justify to anyone here why our preferences for them are more relaxed. You didn't read, did you?
- Mrs. J -"I did you know I did twice,it doesn't matter now anyway because even though I fitted your criteria I'm banned from approaching you now by virtue that I'm a single guy ce la vie | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Well this is nice isn't it
Actually mods: this thread now 'no longer interests' me either, can we indeed please now close it? Thank you.
I didn't know it worked like that. I'm going to close so many threads today bet you don't lol"You can bet your arse I'm going to try though | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| Reply privately |
"Do you think it should be compulsory to join this site? The number of illiterate men on this site is staggering - Mrs. J -" She who casts the first stone. Perhaps a checking your profile before posting the above may have been the wise approach. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"... If you read the posts then you will know that it isn't about spelling or grammar but about single men not reading profiles but nevertheless, sending messages How on earth can a bisexual, 5'10, with a beer belly, non-Caucasian, married man meet my requirements of a straight, Caucasian, 6' or over, fit single man? Clearly he cannot understand words. This is just an example Anyway; I have enough of these silly messages here so we have blocked them. We go often enough to clubs and will strike up a conversation with a single man if there is one who meets our preferences. Otherwise, we will just keep on meeting with couples and single women - Mrs. J -but your post states there's a lot of illiterate people on site as in they're grasp of the written word is poor not that their grasp of what you desire is not being acknowledged or it seems that is what everyone here is responding too so maybe the way you put your point across needs to be addressed They either cannot read or are rude enough to ignore each and every one of our preferences; take your pick And later posts, within a few minutes, explained the context; folk still didn'tt read that and went on to 'scrabbie', deslexia, autocorrect ..... One went as far as pointing out our profile. He hadn't read anything; not even the site FAQs - Mrs. J - Is this a whole take the pee thread because illiteracy isn't about preferences on profiles. Unless I am reading the definition wrong. " I think the point the OP is making, to be fair, is that guys obviously can't read, because if they could they would have read their preferences and hence not messaged them. I think it was flippancy rather than a genuine statement. I can understand their frustration but on sites like this people will always test boundaries and it's to be expected. It's a numbers game - message 100 people outside of their preferences and if only one of them responds positively it's been worth the effort hasn't it? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"... If you read the posts then you will know that it isn't about spelling or grammar but about single men not reading profiles but nevertheless, sending messages How on earth can a bisexual, 5'10, with a beer belly, non-Caucasian, married man meet my requirements of a straight, Caucasian, 6' or over, fit single man? Clearly he cannot understand words. This is just an example Anyway; I have enough of these silly messages here so we have blocked them. We go often enough to clubs and will strike up a conversation with a single man if there is one who meets our preferences. Otherwise, we will just keep on meeting with couples and single women - Mrs. J -but your post states there's a lot of illiterate people on site as in they're grasp of the written word is poor not that their grasp of what you desire is not being acknowledged or it seems that is what everyone here is responding too so maybe the way you put your point across needs to be addressed They either cannot read or are rude enough to ignore each and every one of our preferences; take your pick And later posts, within a few minutes, explained the context; folk still didn'tt read that and went on to 'scrabbie', deslexia, autocorrect ..... One went as far as pointing out our profile. He hadn't read anything; not even the site FAQs - Mrs. J - Is this a whole take the pee thread because illiteracy isn't about preferences on profiles. Unless I am reading the definition wrong. " Have you read the post your are responding to? If so, what does it mean to you? Or are you hell-bent about quoting the original post of a few words throughout this thread, no matter how many later explanations are given? - Mrs. J - | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"... If you read the posts then you will know that it isn't about spelling or grammar but about single men not reading profiles but nevertheless, sending messages How on earth can a bisexual, 5'10, with a beer belly, non-Caucasian, married man meet my requirements of a straight, Caucasian, 6' or over, fit single man? Clearly he cannot understand words. This is just an example Anyway; I have enough of these silly messages here so we have blocked them. We go often enough to clubs and will strike up a conversation with a single man if there is one who meets our preferences. Otherwise, we will just keep on meeting with couples and single women - Mrs. J -but your post states there's a lot of illiterate people on site as in they're grasp of the written word is poor not that their grasp of what you desire is not being acknowledged or it seems that is what everyone here is responding too so maybe the way you put your point across needs to be addressed They either cannot read or are rude enough to ignore each and every one of our preferences; take your pick And later posts, within a few minutes, explained the context; folk still didn'tt read that and went on to 'scrabbie', deslexia, autocorrect ..... One went as far as pointing out our profile. He hadn't read anything; not even the site FAQs - Mrs. J -but the ignorant and illiterate couples and women survived that's where I'm struggling to understand your philosophy They did not as our preferences for them are much more relaxed and I am not going to justify to anyone here why our preferences for them are more relaxed. You didn't read, did you?
- Mrs. J -"many couples don't forget are guys pretending to be couples | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"... If you read the posts then you will know that it isn't about spelling or grammar but about single men not reading profiles but nevertheless, sending messages How on earth can a bisexual, 5'10, with a beer belly, non-Caucasian, married man meet my requirements of a straight, Caucasian, 6' or over, fit single man? Clearly he cannot understand words. This is just an example Anyway; I have enough of these silly messages here so we have blocked them. We go often enough to clubs and will strike up a conversation with a single man if there is one who meets our preferences. Otherwise, we will just keep on meeting with couples and single women - Mrs. J -but your post states there's a lot of illiterate people on site as in they're grasp of the written word is poor not that their grasp of what you desire is not being acknowledged or it seems that is what everyone here is responding too so maybe the way you put your point across needs to be addressed They either cannot read or are rude enough to ignore each and every one of our preferences; take your pick And later posts, within a few minutes, explained the context; folk still didn'tt read that and went on to 'scrabbie', deslexia, autocorrect ..... One went as far as pointing out our profile. He hadn't read anything; not even the site FAQs - Mrs. J -but the ignorant and illiterate couples and women survived that's where I'm struggling to understand your philosophy They did not as our preferences for them are much more relaxed and I am not going to justify to anyone here why our preferences for them are more relaxed. You didn't read, did you?
- Mrs. J -I did you know I did twice,it doesn't matter now anyway because even though I fitted your criteria I'm banned from approaching you now by virtue that I'm a single guy ce la vie "Why would you want to? If she wants a literacy test just to join, imagine the tests she'd have to meet her. Be like re-sitting all your GCSE's again | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Do you think it should be compulsory to join this site? The number of illiterate men on this site is staggering - Mrs. J -not everyone has the gift of words. And it's a swinging site not scrabble club. A gift of words. These idiots cant read; A 5'6", tubby guy in his 50s writing to me when I am looking for someone similar to my husband and say so on my profile hasn't read a word
Anyways, we have solved the problem by blocking singe men from contacting us
- Mrs. J -"*single | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Well this is nice isn't it
Actually mods: this thread now 'no longer interests' me either, can we indeed please now close it? Thank you.
I didn't know it worked like that. I'm going to close so many threads today bet you don't lol
You can bet your arse I'm going to try though "go for it lol I might start a thread with u in mind | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Do you think it should be compulsory to join this site? The number of illiterate men on this site is staggering - Mrs. J -not everyone has the gift of words. And it's a swinging site not scrabble club. A gift of words. These idiots cant read; A 5'6", tubby guy in his 50s writing to me when I am looking for someone similar to my husband and say so on my profile hasn't read a word
Anyways, we have solved the problem by blocking singe men from contacting us
- Mrs. J -
*single"and now all single men have been tarred and feathered | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Illiterate definition a person who can not read or write or person of low education .and that's how the word is defined in dictionary " yes does it not mention most men on Fab in that dictionary have you got Cambridge or oxford versions ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Do you think it should be compulsory to join this site? The number of illiterate men on this site is staggering - Mrs. J - She who casts the first stone. Perhaps a checking your profile before posting the above may have been the wise approach. "We've checked yours
- Mrs. J - | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Well this is nice isn't it
Actually mods: this thread now 'no longer interests' me either, can we indeed please now close it? Thank you.
I didn't know it worked like that. I'm going to close so many threads today bet you don't lol
You can bet your arse I'm going to try though go for it lol I might start a thread with u in mind"Don't bother. Ill call upon the Mighty Mods to do my bidding and get it closed Because that's how it works you know | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"No I don't think knowing that I comes before E except after C determines how good of a fuck you will or won't be " of course it does | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Do you think it should be compulsory to join this site? The number of illiterate men on this site is staggering - Mrs. J -" No. One of our favourite posters is dyslexic. He got a bit of grief at first because people thought he was illiterate. He's funny as hell and we love him. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" If you read the posts then you will know that it isn't about spelling or grammar but about single men not reading profiles but nevertheless, sending messages - Mrs. J -" So you are not discussing literacy but are actually complaining about comprehension, two different things | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Do you think it should be compulsory to join this site? The number of illiterate men on this site is staggering - Mrs. J - No. One of our favourite posters is dyslexic. He got a bit of grief at first because people thought he was illiterate. He's funny as hell and we love him. " I know who you mean | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"... If you read the posts then you will know that it isn't about spelling or grammar but about single men not reading profiles but nevertheless, sending messages How on earth can a bisexual, 5'10, with a beer belly, non-Caucasian, married man meet my requirements of a straight, Caucasian, 6' or over, fit single man? Clearly he cannot understand words. This is just an example Anyway; I have enough of these silly messages here so we have blocked them. We go often enough to clubs and will strike up a conversation with a single man if there is one who meets our preferences. Otherwise, we will just keep on meeting with couples and single women - Mrs. J -but your post states there's a lot of illiterate people on site as in they're grasp of the written word is poor not that their grasp of what you desire is not being acknowledged or it seems that is what everyone here is responding too so maybe the way you put your point across needs to be addressed They either cannot read or are rude enough to ignore each and every one of our preferences; take your pick And later posts, within a few minutes, explained the context; folk still didn'tt read that and went on to 'scrabbie', deslexia, autocorrect ..... One went as far as pointing out our profile. He hadn't read anything; not even the site FAQs - Mrs. J -but that's not illiteracy that's ignorance two very different things How do I know if he is illiterate or just plain rude? Anyways guys, I can't be bothered anymore; have fun here
- Mrs. J -"Your somewhat 'superior than thou' attitude is a very unattractive trait. Even if you did allow Men to message you, rest assured - you wouldn't be receiving one from me. Good day to you.  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Do you think it should be compulsory to join this site? The number of illiterate men on this site is staggering - Mrs. J - No. One of our favourite posters is dyslexic. He got a bit of grief at first because people thought he was illiterate. He's funny as hell and we love him. " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"No I don't think knowing that I comes before E except after C determines how good of a fuck you will or won't be " But knowing that one is 5'8" guy and in his 50s is not going to get him a fuck with me, so why bother writing to me? Can he not read?
- Mrs. J - | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"... If you read the posts then you will know that it isn't about spelling or grammar but about single men not reading profiles but nevertheless, sending messages How on earth can a bisexual, 5'10, with a beer belly, non-Caucasian, married man meet my requirements of a straight, Caucasian, 6' or over, fit single man? Clearly he cannot understand words. This is just an example Anyway; I have enough of these silly messages here so we have blocked them. We go often enough to clubs and will strike up a conversation with a single man if there is one who meets our preferences. Otherwise, we will just keep on meeting with couples and single women - Mrs. J -but your post states there's a lot of illiterate people on site as in they're grasp of the written word is poor not that their grasp of what you desire is not being acknowledged or it seems that is what everyone here is responding too so maybe the way you put your point across needs to be addressed They either cannot read or are rude enough to ignore each and every one of our preferences; take your pick And later posts, within a few minutes, explained the context; folk still didn'tt read that and went on to 'scrabbie', deslexia, autocorrect ..... One went as far as pointing out our profile. He hadn't read anything; not even the site FAQs - Mrs. J -but that's not illiteracy that's ignorance two very different things How do I know if he is illiterate or just plain rude? Anyways guys, I can't be bothered anymore; have fun here
- Mrs. J -
Your somewhat 'superior than thou' attitude is a very unattractive trait. Even if you did allow Men to message you, rest assured - you wouldn't be receiving one from me.
Good day to you. "Thank you so much. We are relieved considering that we blocked single men from messaging us. But you have informed us anyway that you won't be messaging us. In not so many words, that it is "or loss"
- Mrs. J - | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"... If you read the posts then you will know that it isn't about spelling or grammar but about single men not reading profiles but nevertheless, sending messages How on earth can a bisexual, 5'10, with a beer belly, non-Caucasian, married man meet my requirements of a straight, Caucasian, 6' or over, fit single man? Clearly he cannot understand words. This is just an example Anyway; I have enough of these silly messages here so we have blocked them. We go often enough to clubs and will strike up a conversation with a single man if there is one who meets our preferences. Otherwise, we will just keep on meeting with couples and single women - Mrs. J -but your post states there's a lot of illiterate people on site as in they're grasp of the written word is poor not that their grasp of what you desire is not being acknowledged or it seems that is what everyone here is responding too so maybe the way you put your point across needs to be addressed They either cannot read or are rude enough to ignore each and every one of our preferences; take your pick And later posts, within a few minutes, explained the context; folk still didn'tt read that and went on to 'scrabbie', deslexia, autocorrect ..... One went as far as pointing out our profile. He hadn't read anything; not even the site FAQs - Mrs. J -but that's not illiteracy that's ignorance two very different things How do I know if he is illiterate or just plain rude? Anyways guys, I can't be bothered anymore; have fun here
- Mrs. J -
Your somewhat 'superior than thou' attitude is a very unattractive trait. Even if you did allow Men to message you, rest assured - you wouldn't be receiving one from me.
Good day to you.
Thank you so much. We are relieved considering that we blocked single men from messaging us. But you have informed us anyway that you won't be messaging us. In not so many words, that it is "or loss"
- Mrs. J -"*your | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Do you think it should be compulsory to join this site? The number of illiterate men on this site is staggering - Mrs. J -" Have you checked your own profile or is this a fun thread rather than a serious one ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Do you think it should be compulsory to join this site? The number of illiterate men on this site is staggering - Mrs. J -not everyone has the gift of words. And it's a swinging site not scrabble club. A gift of words. These idiots cant read; A 5'6", tubby guy in his 50s writing to me when I am looking for someone similar to my husband and say so on my profile hasn't read a word
Anyways, we have solved the problem by blocking singe men from contacting us
- Mrs. J -
*singleand now all single men have been tarred and feathered "No, but when one receives 100s of meassages and only two meet the stated preferences, it is time to give up on that particular group here We will just meet single men when we visit clubs - Mrs. J - | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Do you think it should be compulsory to join this site? The number of illiterate men on this site is staggering - Mrs. J - If I was you I'd check my own profile before writing a post such as that " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Do you think it should be compulsory to join this site? The number of illiterate men on this site is staggering - Mrs. J - Have you checked your own profile or is this a fun thread rather than a serious one ?" Yes. Have you checked yours? - Mrs. J - | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"... If you read the posts then you will know that it isn't about spelling or grammar but about single men not reading profiles but nevertheless, sending messages How on earth can a bisexual, 5'10, with a beer belly, non-Caucasian, married man meet my requirements of a straight, Caucasian, 6' or over, fit single man? Clearly he cannot understand words. This is just an example Anyway; I have enough of these silly messages here so we have blocked them. We go often enough to clubs and will strike up a conversation with a single man if there is one who meets our preferences. Otherwise, we will just keep on meeting with couples and single women - Mrs. J -but your post states there's a lot of illiterate people on site as in they're grasp of the written word is poor not that their grasp of what you desire is not being acknowledged or it seems that is what everyone here is responding too so maybe the way you put your point across needs to be addressed They either cannot read or are rude enough to ignore each and every one of our preferences; take your pick And later posts, within a few minutes, explained the context; folk still didn'tt read that and went on to 'scrabbie', deslexia, autocorrect ..... One went as far as pointing out our profile. He hadn't read anything; not even the site FAQs - Mrs. J -but that's not illiteracy that's ignorance two very different things How do I know if he is illiterate or just plain rude? Anyways guys, I can't be bothered anymore; have fun here
- Mrs. J -
Your somewhat 'superior than thou' attitude is a very unattractive trait. Even if you did allow Men to message you, rest assured - you wouldn't be receiving one from me.
Good day to you.
Thank you so much. We are relieved considering that we blocked single men from messaging us. But you have informed us anyway that you won't be messaging us. In not so many words, that it is "or loss"
- Mrs. J -"If someone with your attitude didn't want to meet me, I certainly wouldn't see it as "my loss" | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"... If you read the posts then you will know that it isn't about spelling or grammar but about single men not reading profiles but nevertheless, sending messages How on earth can a bisexual, 5'10, with a beer belly, non-Caucasian, married man meet my requirements of a straight, Caucasian, 6' or over, fit single man? Clearly he cannot understand words. This is just an example Anyway; I have enough of these silly messages here so we have blocked them. We go often enough to clubs and will strike up a conversation with a single man if there is one who meets our preferences. Otherwise, we will just keep on meeting with couples and single women - Mrs. J -but your post states there's a lot of illiterate people on site as in they're grasp of the written word is poor not that their grasp of what you desire is not being acknowledged or it seems that is what everyone here is responding too so maybe the way you put your point across needs to be addressed They either cannot read or are rude enough to ignore each and every one of our preferences; take your pick And later posts, within a few minutes, explained the context; folk still didn'tt read that and went on to 'scrabbie', deslexia, autocorrect ..... One went as far as pointing out our profile. He hadn't read anything; not even the site FAQs - Mrs. J -but that's not illiteracy that's ignorance two very different things How do I know if he is illiterate or just plain rude? Anyways guys, I can't be bothered anymore; have fun here
- Mrs. J -
Your somewhat 'superior than thou' attitude is a very unattractive trait. Even if you did allow Men to message you, rest assured - you wouldn't be receiving one from me.
Good day to you.
Thank you so much. We are relieved considering that we blocked single men from messaging us. But you have informed us anyway that you won't be messaging us. In not so many words, that it is "or loss"
- Mrs. J -
If someone with your attitude didn't want to meet me, I certainly wouldn't see it as "my loss""Than you. I am grateful - Mrs. J - | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"... If you read the posts then you will know that it isn't about spelling or grammar but about single men not reading profiles but nevertheless, sending messages How on earth can a bisexual, 5'10, with a beer belly, non-Caucasian, married man meet my requirements of a straight, Caucasian, 6' or over, fit single man? Clearly he cannot understand words. This is just an example Anyway; I have enough of these silly messages here so we have blocked them. We go often enough to clubs and will strike up a conversation with a single man if there is one who meets our preferences. Otherwise, we will just keep on meeting with couples and single women - Mrs. J -but your post states there's a lot of illiterate people on site as in they're grasp of the written word is poor not that their grasp of what you desire is not being acknowledged or it seems that is what everyone here is responding too so maybe the way you put your point across needs to be addressed They either cannot read or are rude enough to ignore each and every one of our preferences; take your pick And later posts, within a few minutes, explained the context; folk still didn'tt read that and went on to 'scrabbie', deslexia, autocorrect ..... One went as far as pointing out our profile. He hadn't read anything; not even the site FAQs - Mrs. J -but that's not illiteracy that's ignorance two very different things How do I know if he is illiterate or just plain rude? Anyways guys, I can't be bothered anymore; have fun here
- Mrs. J -
Your somewhat 'superior than thou' attitude is a very unattractive trait. Even if you did allow Men to message you, rest assured - you wouldn't be receiving one from me.
Good day to you.
Thank you so much. We are relieved considering that we blocked single men from messaging us. But you have informed us anyway that you won't be messaging us. In not so many words, that it is "or loss"
- Mrs. J -
If someone with your attitude didn't want to meet me, I certainly wouldn't see it as "my loss"
Than you. I am grateful
- Mrs. J -"For someone who has an issue with people's literacy, you do make an awful lot of spelling mistakes | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"... If you read the posts then you will know that it isn't about spelling or grammar but about single men not reading profiles but nevertheless, sending messages How on earth can a bisexual, 5'10, with a beer belly, non-Caucasian, married man meet my requirements of a straight, Caucasian, 6' or over, fit single man? Clearly he cannot understand words. This is just an example Anyway; I have enough of these silly messages here so we have blocked them. We go often enough to clubs and will strike up a conversation with a single man if there is one who meets our preferences. Otherwise, we will just keep on meeting with couples and single women - Mrs. J -but your post states there's a lot of illiterate people on site as in they're grasp of the written word is poor not that their grasp of what you desire is not being acknowledged or it seems that is what everyone here is responding too so maybe the way you put your point across needs to be addressed They either cannot read or are rude enough to ignore each and every one of our preferences; take your pick And later posts, within a few minutes, explained the context; folk still didn'tt read that and went on to 'scrabbie', deslexia, autocorrect ..... One went as far as pointing out our profile. He hadn't read anything; not even the site FAQs - Mrs. J -but that's not illiteracy that's ignorance two very different things How do I know if he is illiterate or just plain rude? Anyways guys, I can't be bothered anymore; have fun here
- Mrs. J -
Your somewhat 'superior than thou' attitude is a very unattractive trait. Even if you did allow Men to message you, rest assured - you wouldn't be receiving one from me.
Good day to you.
Thank you so much. We are relieved considering that we blocked single men from messaging us. But you have informed us anyway that you won't be messaging us. In not so many words, that it is "or loss"
- Mrs. J -
*your"No...no it really is not my loss. I would even avoid you in a club situation. I'll be off now, as I'm tired and really quite bored with this thread. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Do you think it should be compulsory to join this site? The number of illiterate men on this site is staggering - Mrs. J - Have you checked your own profile or is this a fun thread rather than a serious one ? Yes. Have you checked yours? - Mrs. J -" Im not the person being critical of others. That's you. Your status update is what i read, i didn't read your profile. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Do you think it should be compulsory to join this site? The number of illiterate men on this site is staggering - Mrs. J -not everyone has the gift of words. And it's a swinging site not scrabble club. A gift of words. These idiots cant read; A 5'6", tubby guy in his 50s writing to me when I am looking for someone similar to my husband and say so on my profile hasn't read a word
Anyways, we have solved the problem by blocking singe men from contacting us
- Mrs. J -"Oooh look some females are also illiterate judging by the inability to spell single 
My phone auto corrects a lot, sometimes it's pretty funny. I told someone to sell a customer half price girls instead of tiles the other day.
I don't think it's just men that have problems spelling on here. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Do you think it should be compulsory to join this site? The number of illiterate men on this site is staggering - Mrs. J - Have you checked your own profile or is this a fun thread rather than a serious one ? Yes. Have you checked yours? - Mrs. J - Im not the person being critical of others. That's you. Your status update is what i read, i didn't read your profile." Oh, you mean, "We are at S Private club on Friday 26th and would like to meet with some nice friendly people. Please say "hi" if you are planning to be thre too. E&J". Thanks, we've corrected the typo where "there" was mistyped as "thre" - Mrs. J - | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Is this about men not reading your requirements or about their spelling? I haven't bothered to read the whole thread so don't know "*I* did not mention spelling, grammar, dyslexia, etc, anywhere. Many others did but I didn't - Mrs. J - | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"No I don't think knowing that I comes before E except after C determines how good of a fuck you will or won't be But knowing that one is 5'8" guy and in his 50s is not going to get him a fuck with me, so why bother writing to me? Can he not read?
- Mrs. J -"He can read he just can't be arsed to, Good news is however there is an age filter that you can set, so then You don't need to worry about men in their over 50s messaging you because they're unable to. Of course if you were literate enough to read the sites new starter tips or FAQs you'd know that already | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"No I don't think knowing that I comes before E except after C determines how good of a fuck you will or won't be But knowing that one is 5'8" guy and in his 50s is not going to get him a fuck with me, so why bother writing to me? Can he not read?
- Mrs. J -
He can read he just can't be arsed to,
Good news is however there is an age filter that you can set, so then You don't need to worry about men in their over 50s messaging you because they're unable to. Of course if you were literate enough to read the sites new starter tips or FAQs you'd know that already "Good call. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Not you curvy ..... the O.P. " I knew who you meant granny | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"... If you read the posts then you will know that it isn't about spelling or grammar but about single men not reading profiles but nevertheless, sending messages How on earth can a bisexual, 5'10, with a beer belly, non-Caucasian, married man meet my requirements of a straight, Caucasian, 6' or over, fit single man? Clearly he cannot understand words. This is just an example Anyway; I have enough of these silly messages here so we have blocked them. We go often enough to clubs and will strike up a conversation with a single man if there is one who meets our preferences. Otherwise, we will just keep on meeting with couples and single women - Mrs. J -but your post states there's a lot of illiterate people on site as in they're grasp of the written word is poor not that their grasp of what you desire is not being acknowledged or it seems that is what everyone here is responding too so maybe the way you put your point across needs to be addressed They either cannot read or are rude enough to ignore each and every one of our preferences; take your pick And later posts, within a few minutes, explained the context; folk still didn'tt read that and went on to 'scrabbie', deslexia, autocorrect ..... One went as far as pointing out our profile. He hadn't read anything; not even the site FAQs - Mrs. J -but that's not illiteracy that's ignorance two very different things How do I know if he is illiterate or just plain rude? Anyways guys, I can't be bothered anymore; have fun here
- Mrs. J -
Your somewhat 'superior than thou' attitude is a very unattractive trait. Even if you did allow Men to message you, rest assured - you wouldn't be receiving one from me.
Good day to you.
Thank you so much. We are relieved considering that we blocked single men from messaging us. But you have informed us anyway that you won't be messaging us. In not so many words, that it is "or loss"
And if by a "superior attitude" you are referring to our preferences, then yes, we have a "superior attitude"
- Mrs. J -
*your
No...no it really is not my loss. I would even avoid you in a club situation.
I'll be off now, as I'm tired and really quite bored with this thread. "Thanks again. Since it is *you* who has bought up this subject twice now, we will be grateful if you do not since you do not meet our preferences and we feel a little bad saying "no" to people And "or loss" was meant to read, "our loss". A term which we have become familiar with as it is used by men when they don't meet any of our preferences and to whome we have replied with a "no thanks". We are not very bright so are still struggling with figuring out how it is "our loss" for not meeting someone who we did not want to meet in the first place And if by, *superior attitude" you are referring to our preferences then yes, we agree; we have this "superior attitude" of only wanting to meet with men who I find attractive - Mrs. J - | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"... If you read the posts then you will know that it isn't about spelling or grammar but about single men not reading profiles but nevertheless, sending messages How on earth can a bisexual, 5'10, with a beer belly, non-Caucasian, married man meet my requirements of a straight, Caucasian, 6' or over, fit single man? Clearly he cannot understand words. This is just an example Anyway; I have enough of these silly messages here so we have blocked them. We go often enough to clubs and will strike up a conversation with a single man if there is one who meets our preferences. Otherwise, we will just keep on meeting with couples and single women - Mrs. J -but your post states there's a lot of illiterate people on site as in they're grasp of the written word is poor not that their grasp of what you desire is not being acknowledged or it seems that is what everyone here is responding too so maybe the way you put your point across needs to be addressed They either cannot read or are rude enough to ignore each and every one of our preferences; take your pick And later posts, within a few minutes, explained the context; folk still didn'tt read that and went on to 'scrabbie', deslexia, autocorrect ..... One went as far as pointing out our profile. He hadn't read anything; not even the site FAQs - Mrs. J -but that's not illiteracy that's ignorance two very different things How do I know if he is illiterate or just plain rude? Anyways guys, I can't be bothered anymore; have fun here
- Mrs. J -
Your somewhat 'superior than thou' attitude is a very unattractive trait. Even if you did allow Men to message you, rest assured - you wouldn't be receiving one from me.
Good day to you.
Thank you so much. We are relieved considering that we blocked single men from messaging us. But you have informed us anyway that you won't be messaging us. In not so many words, that it is "or loss"
- Mrs. J -
*your"our | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"No I don't think knowing that I comes before E except after C determines how good of a fuck you will or won't be But knowing that one is 5'8" guy and in his 50s is not going to get him a fuck with me, so why bother writing to me? Can he not read?
- Mrs. J -
He can read he just can't be arsed to,
Good news is however there is an age filter that you can set, so then You don't need to worry about men in their over 50s messaging you because they're unable to. Of course if you were literate enough to read the sites new starter tips or FAQs you'd know that already "There you go, making perfect sense and ruining their thread | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Illiteracy isn't the same as opportunism. Someone may be more than capable of reading your profile but simply chooses not to and messages anyway on the off chance. That is a far more logical conclusion as to why people outside your preferences message than assuming they can't read." oh god youre so logical | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"No I don't think knowing that I comes before E except after C determines how good of a fuck you will or won't be But knowing that one is 5'8" guy and in his 50s is not going to get him a fuck with me, so why bother writing to me? Can he not read?
- Mrs. J -
He can read he just can't be arsed to,
Good news is however there is an age filter that you can set, so then You don't need to worry about men in their over 50s messaging you because they're unable to. Of course if you were literate enough to read the sites new starter tips or FAQs you'd know that already "We think we can read and have therefore set our age filters from 30 to 60 as we want to meet women between 30 to 60. Can you please read and tell us how to set the age filters separately for men between 35 to 45 as we only want to meet men between 35 to 45 years old. Please, pretty please
We couldn't find any drop-down to set separate age filters so we wrote it quite explicitly within our profile text where we mentioned meeting single men
Eagerly awaiting your reply
- Mrs. J - | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"No I don't think knowing that I comes before E except after C determines how good of a fuck you will or won't be But knowing that one is 5'8" guy and in his 50s is not going to get him a fuck with me, so why bother writing to me? Can he not read?
- Mrs. J -
He can read he just can't be arsed to,
Good news is however there is an age filter that you can set, so then You don't need to worry about men in their over 50s messaging you because they're unable to. Of course if you were literate enough to read the sites new starter tips or FAQs you'd know that already
There you go, making perfect sense and ruining their thread "Perhaps, you or the other clever folk here can advise us how to set separate age filters for different 'gender' categories, just in case curvymamma struggles to find a way to do this.
Anyone?
- Mrs. J - | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"... If you read the posts then you will know that it isn't about spelling or grammar but about single men not reading profiles but nevertheless, sending messages How on earth can a bisexual, 5'10, with a beer belly, non-Caucasian, married man meet my requirements of a straight, Caucasian, 6' or over, fit single man? Clearly he cannot understand words. This is just an example Anyway; I have enough of these silly messages here so we have blocked them. We go often enough to clubs and will strike up a conversation with a single man if there is one who meets our preferences. Otherwise, we will just keep on meeting with couples and single women - Mrs. J -but your post states there's a lot of illiterate people on site as in they're grasp of the written word is poor not that their grasp of what you desire is not being acknowledged or it seems that is what everyone here is responding too so maybe the way you put your point across needs to be addressed They either cannot read or are rude enough to ignore each and every one of our preferences; take your pick And later posts, within a few minutes, explained the context; folk still didn'tt read that and went on to 'scrabbie', deslexia, autocorrect ..... One went as far as pointing out our profile. He hadn't read anything; not even the site FAQs - Mrs. J -but that's not illiteracy that's ignorance two very different things How do I know if he is illiterate or just plain rude? Anyways guys, I can't be bothered anymore; have fun here
- Mrs. J -
Your somewhat 'superior than thou' attitude is a very unattractive trait. Even if you did allow Men to message you, rest assured - you wouldn't be receiving one from me.
Good day to you.
Thank you so much. We are relieved considering that we blocked single men from messaging us. But you have informed us anyway that you won't be messaging us. In not so many words, that it is "or loss"
And if by a "superior attitude" you are referring to our preferences, then yes, we have a "superior attitude"
- Mrs. J -
*your
No...no it really is not my loss. I would even avoid you in a club situation.
I'll be off now, as I'm tired and really quite bored with this thread.
Thanks again. Since it is *you* who has bought up this subject twice now, we will be grateful if you do not since you do not meet our preferences and we feel a little bad saying "no" to people
And "or loss" was meant to read, "our loss". A term which we have become familiar with as it is used by men when they don't meet any of our preferences and to whome we have replied with a "no thanks". We are not very bright so are still struggling with figuring out how it is "our loss" for not meeting someone who we did not want to meet in the first place
And if by, *superior attitude" you are referring to our preferences then yes, we agree; we have this "superior attitude" of only wanting to meet with men who I find attractive
- Mrs. J -"Yaaawwwn! I thought you were bored with this thread? I really am going now. Bye. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"No I don't think knowing that I comes before E except after C determines how good of a fuck you will or won't be But knowing that one is 5'8" guy and in his 50s is not going to get him a fuck with me, so why bother writing to me? Can he not read?
- Mrs. J -
He can read he just can't be arsed to,
Good news is however there is an age filter that you can set, so then You don't need to worry about men in their over 50s messaging you because they're unable to. Of course if you were literate enough to read the sites new starter tips or FAQs you'd know that already
We think we can read and have therefore set our age filters from 30 to 60 as we want to meet women between 30 to 60. Can you please read and tell us how to set the age filters separately for men between 35 to 45 as we only want to meet men between 35 to 45 years old. Please, pretty please
We couldn't find any drop-down to set separate age filters so we wrote it quite explicitly within our profile text where we mentioned meeting single men
Eagerly awaiting your reply
- Mrs. J -"So set the filters to control the men side of things and look for the ladies yourself a quick note in messages/on you profile to say that's what you do is all that's needed as the ladies are more likely to actually read your profile anyway Problem solved it's really that simple | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"... If you read the posts then you will know that it isn't about spelling or grammar but about single men not reading profiles but nevertheless, sending messages How on earth can a bisexual, 5'10, with a beer belly, non-Caucasian, married man meet my requirements of a straight, Caucasian, 6' or over, fit single man? Clearly he cannot understand words. This is just an example Anyway; I have enough of these silly messages here so we have blocked them. We go often enough to clubs and will strike up a conversation with a single man if there is one who meets our preferences. Otherwise, we will just keep on meeting with couples and single women - Mrs. J -but your post states there's a lot of illiterate people on site as in they're grasp of the written word is poor not that their grasp of what you desire is not being acknowledged or it seems that is what everyone here is responding too so maybe the way you put your point across needs to be addressed They either cannot read or are rude enough to ignore each and every one of our preferences; take your pick And later posts, within a few minutes, explained the context; folk still didn'tt read that and went on to 'scrabbie', deslexia, autocorrect ..... One went as far as pointing out our profile. He hadn't read anything; not even the site FAQs - Mrs. J -but that's not illiteracy that's ignorance two very different things How do I know if he is illiterate or just plain rude? Anyways guys, I can't be bothered anymore; have fun here
- Mrs. J -
Your somewhat 'superior than thou' attitude is a very unattractive trait. Even if you did allow Men to message you, rest assured - you wouldn't be receiving one from me.
Good day to you.
Thank you so much. We are relieved considering that we blocked single men from messaging us. But you have informed us anyway that you won't be messaging us. In not so many words, that it is "or loss"
And if by a "superior attitude" you are referring to our preferences, then yes, we have a "superior attitude"
- Mrs. J -
*your
No...no it really is not my loss. I would even avoid you in a club situation.
I'll be off now, as I'm tired and really quite bored with this thread.
Thanks again. Since it is *you* who has bought up this subject twice now, we will be grateful if you do not since you do not meet our preferences and we feel a little bad saying "no" to people
And "or loss" was meant to read, "our loss". A term which we have become familiar with as it is used by men when they don't meet any of our preferences and to whome we have replied with a "no thanks". We are not very bright so are still struggling with figuring out how it is "our loss" for not meeting someone who we did not want to meet in the first place
And if by, *superior attitude" you are referring to our preferences then yes, we agree; we have this "superior attitude" of only wanting to meet with men who I find attractive
- Mrs. J -
Yaaawwwn! I thought you were bored with this thread?
I really am going now. Bye. "Thought it was rude not to reply to your 'well-constructed' argument'
Bye
- Mrs. J - | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Is this about men not reading your requirements or about their spelling? I haven't bothered to read the whole thread so don't know
*I* did not mention spelling, grammar, dyslexia, etc, anywhere. Many others did but I didn't
- Mrs. J -"Doesn't a literacy test consist of the following? Spelling Punctuation Grammar Comprehension | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"No I don't think knowing that I comes before E except after C determines how good of a fuck you will or won't be But knowing that one is 5'8" guy and in his 50s is not going to get him a fuck with me, so why bother writing to me? Can he not read?
- Mrs. J -
He can read he just can't be arsed to,
Good news is however there is an age filter that you can set, so then You don't need to worry about men in their over 50s messaging you because they're unable to. Of course if you were literate enough to read the sites new starter tips or FAQs you'd know that already
We think we can read and have therefore set our age filters from 30 to 60 as we want to meet women between 30 to 60. Can you please read and tell us how to set the age filters separately for men between 35 to 45 as we only want to meet men between 35 to 45 years old. Please, pretty please
We couldn't find any drop-down to set separate age filters so we wrote it quite explicitly within our profile text where we mentioned meeting single men
Eagerly awaiting your reply
- Mrs. J -
So set the filters to control the men side of things and look for the ladies yourself a quick note in messages/on you profile to say that's what you do is all that's needed as the ladies are more likely to actually read your profile anyway
Problem solved it's really that simple "Oh, stupid us. So we restrict the ages for couples and single women when it is them we are primarly looking to meet. Great idea
Our profile gets read by 100s of men, a few couples and maybe two or three women per week. Your 'suggestion' makes perfect sense
- Mrs. J - | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"No I don't think knowing that I comes before E except after C determines how good of a fuck you will or won't be But knowing that one is 5'8" guy and in his 50s is not going to get him a fuck with me, so why bother writing to me? Can he not read?
- Mrs. J -
He can read he just can't be arsed to,
Good news is however there is an age filter that you can set, so then You don't need to worry about men in their over 50s messaging you because they're unable to. Of course if you were literate enough to read the sites new starter tips or FAQs you'd know that already
We think we can read and have therefore set our age filters from 30 to 60 as we want to meet women between 30 to 60. Can you please read and tell us how to set the age filters separately for men between 35 to 45 as we only want to meet men between 35 to 45 years old. Please, pretty please
We couldn't find any drop-down to set separate age filters so we wrote it quite explicitly within our profile text where we mentioned meeting single men
Eagerly awaiting your reply
- Mrs. J -
So set the filters to control the men side of things and look for the ladies yourself a quick note in messages/on you profile to say that's what you do is all that's needed as the ladies are more likely to actually read your profile anyway
Problem solved it's really that simple
Oh, stupid us. So we restrict the ages for couples and single women when it is them we are primarly looking to meet. Great idea
Our profile gets read by 100s of men, a few couples and maybe two or three women per week. Your 'suggestion' makes perfect sense
- Mrs. J -"It will do to someone that doesn't clearly have a bee in their bonnet | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"No I don't think knowing that I comes before E except after C determines how good of a fuck you will or won't be But knowing that one is 5'8" guy and in his 50s is not going to get him a fuck with me, so why bother writing to me? Can he not read?
- Mrs. J -
He can read he just can't be arsed to,
Good news is however there is an age filter that you can set, so then You don't need to worry about men in their over 50s messaging you because they're unable to. Of course if you were literate enough to read the sites new starter tips or FAQs you'd know that already
We think we can read and have therefore set our age filters from 30 to 60 as we want to meet women between 30 to 60. Can you please read and tell us how to set the age filters separately for men between 35 to 45 as we only want to meet men between 35 to 45 years old. Please, pretty please
We couldn't find any drop-down to set separate age filters so we wrote it quite explicitly within our profile text where we mentioned meeting single men
Eagerly awaiting your reply
- Mrs. J -
So set the filters to control the men side of things and look for the ladies yourself a quick note in messages/on you profile to say that's what you do is all that's needed as the ladies are more likely to actually read your profile anyway
Problem solved it's really that simple
Oh, stupid us. So we restrict the ages for couples and single women when it is them we are primarly looking to meet. Great idea
Our profile gets read by 100s of men, a few couples and maybe two or three women per week. Your 'suggestion' makes perfect sense
- Mrs. J -
It will do to someone that doesn't clearly have a bee in their bonnet "Are you suggesting that we filter out women between the ages of 30-35 and 45-60 when it is them and couples that we primarily want to meet and by doing that, we don't appear in their searches either? Very clever strategy for having a profile on this site to filter out the very people one primarily wants to meet
I don't think we will follow your clever 'suggestion'
- Mrs. J - | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"No I don't think knowing that I comes before E except after C determines how good of a fuck you will or won't be But knowing that one is 5'8" guy and in his 50s is not going to get him a fuck with me, so why bother writing to me? Can he not read?
- Mrs. J -
He can read he just can't be arsed to,
Good news is however there is an age filter that you can set, so then You don't need to worry about men in their over 50s messaging you because they're unable to. Of course if you were literate enough to read the sites new starter tips or FAQs you'd know that already
We think we can read and have therefore set our age filters from 30 to 60 as we want to meet women between 30 to 60. Can you please read and tell us how to set the age filters separately for men between 35 to 45 as we only want to meet men between 35 to 45 years old. Please, pretty please
We couldn't find any drop-down to set separate age filters so we wrote it quite explicitly within our profile text where we mentioned meeting single men
Eagerly awaiting your reply
- Mrs. J -
So set the filters to control the men side of things and look for the ladies yourself a quick note in messages/on you profile to say that's what you do is all that's needed as the ladies are more likely to actually read your profile anyway
Problem solved it's really that simple
Oh, stupid us. So we restrict the ages for couples and single women when it is them we are primarly looking to meet. Great idea
Our profile gets read by 100s of men, a few couples and maybe two or three women per week. Your 'suggestion' makes perfect sense
- Mrs. J -
It will do to someone that doesn't clearly have a bee in their bonnet
Are you suggesting that we filter out women between the ages of 30-35 and 45-60 when it is them and couples that we primarily want to meet and by doing that, we don't appear in their searches either? Very clever strategy for having a profile on this site to filter out the very people one primarily wants to meet
I don't think we will follow your clever 'suggestion'
- Mrs. J -"That's fine no one said you had too but I manage it just fine practicing what I preach in that regard so it at least works for me. You may not appear in their searches but they can in yours. Heaven forbid you have to do a bit more leg work yourself to get a shag hey | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Is this about men not reading your requirements or about their spelling? I haven't bothered to read the whole thread so don't know
*I* did not mention spelling, grammar, dyslexia, etc, anywhere. Many others did but I didn't
- Mrs. J -
Doesn't a literacy test consist of the following?
Spelling
Punctuation
Grammar
Comprehension
"Yes it does. The op is a wum intent on winding people up and is succeeding looking at some of the replies on this thread.
Their grammar is far from perfect but chose to deflect this by constantly attacking single guys. They made our block list a long time ago. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"No I don't think knowing that I comes before E except after C determines how good of a fuck you will or won't be But knowing that one is 5'8" guy and in his 50s is not going to get him a fuck with me, so why bother writing to me? Can he not read?
- Mrs. J -
He can read he just can't be arsed to,
Good news is however there is an age filter that you can set, so then You don't need to worry about men in their over 50s messaging you because they're unable to. Of course if you were literate enough to read the sites new starter tips or FAQs you'd know that already
We think we can read and have therefore set our age filters from 30 to 60 as we want to meet women between 30 to 60. Can you please read and tell us how to set the age filters separately for men between 35 to 45 as we only want to meet men between 35 to 45 years old. Please, pretty please
We couldn't find any drop-down to set separate age filters so we wrote it quite explicitly within our profile text where we mentioned meeting single men
Eagerly awaiting your reply
- Mrs. J -
So set the filters to control the men side of things and look for the ladies yourself a quick note in messages/on you profile to say that's what you do is all that's needed as the ladies are more likely to actually read your profile anyway
Problem solved it's really that simple "awwww hey dont think that's a fair assumption if their were the same ratios men to women yes but their are probably 4 or 5 times as many men to women | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Can I just ask what 'youse' is supposed to be? I'm not up on text speak but I saw it yesterday & couldn't fathom what it meant Thanks Sorry to hijack the literacy thread "youser youser abbreviated !! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Many of the worlds richest men can't spoil properly! "So after that post how loaded are you then? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Can I just ask what 'youse' is supposed to be? I'm not up on text speak but I saw it yesterday & couldn't fathom what it meant Thanks Sorry to hijack the literacy thread "It's Scouse for 'you'. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Many of the worlds richest men can't spoil properly!
So after that post how loaded are you then? " I'm just you're average Iliterate | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"No I don't think knowing that I comes before E except after C determines how good of a fuck you will or won't be But knowing that one is 5'8" guy and in his 50s is not going to get him a fuck with me, so why bother writing to me? Can he not read?
- Mrs. J -
He can read he just can't be arsed to,
Good news is however there is an age filter that you can set, so then You don't need to worry about men in their over 50s messaging you because they're unable to. Of course if you were literate enough to read the sites new starter tips or FAQs you'd know that already
We think we can read and have therefore set our age filters from 30 to 60 as we want to meet women between 30 to 60. Can you please read and tell us how to set the age filters separately for men between 35 to 45 as we only want to meet men between 35 to 45 years old. Please, pretty please
We couldn't find any drop-down to set separate age filters so we wrote it quite explicitly within our profile text where we mentioned meeting single men
Eagerly awaiting your reply
- Mrs. J -
So set the filters to control the men side of things and look for the ladies yourself a quick note in messages/on you profile to say that's what you do is all that's needed as the ladies are more likely to actually read your profile anyway
Problem solved it's really that simple
Oh, stupid us. So we restrict the ages for couples and single women when it is them we are primarly looking to meet. Great idea
Our profile gets read by 100s of men, a few couples and maybe two or three women per week. Your 'suggestion' makes perfect sense
- Mrs. J -
It will do to someone that doesn't clearly have a bee in their bonnet
Are you suggesting that we filter out women between the ages of 30-35 and 45-60 when it is them and couples that we primarily want to meet and by doing that, we don't appear in their searches either? Very clever strategy for having a profile on this site to filter out the very people one primarily wants to meet
I don't think we will follow your clever 'suggestion'
- Mrs. J -
That's fine no one said you had too but I manage it just fine practicing what I preach in that regard so it at least works for me. You may not appear in their searches but they can in yours. Heaven forbid you have to do a bit more leg work yourself to get a shag hey"But you are only looking for single men, so ofcourse it works for you We were primarily looking for women and couples and would have liked to meet a couple of single men too However, with what we have experienced over here, asking for single men appears to be a complete waste of time. So, we have now blocked that category and will look for them in a club when we visit. It isn't as if they are in short supply there Better solution for us than filtering out people who we are primarily looking to meet
Please don't worry about me getting a 'shag'; I'll be getting one, two or three tonight and tomorrow night and ...
- Mrs J - | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"No I don't think knowing that I comes before E except after C determines how good of a fuck you will or won't be But knowing that one is 5'8" guy and in his 50s is not going to get him a fuck with me, so why bother writing to me? Can he not read?
- Mrs. J -
He can read he just can't be arsed to,
Good news is however there is an age filter that you can set, so then You don't need to worry about men in their over 50s messaging you because they're unable to. Of course if you were literate enough to read the sites new starter tips or FAQs you'd know that already
We think we can read and have therefore set our age filters from 30 to 60 as we want to meet women between 30 to 60. Can you please read and tell us how to set the age filters separately for men between 35 to 45 as we only want to meet men between 35 to 45 years old. Please, pretty please
We couldn't find any drop-down to set separate age filters so we wrote it quite explicitly within our profile text where we mentioned meeting single men
Eagerly awaiting your reply
- Mrs. J -
So set the filters to control the men side of things and look for the ladies yourself a quick note in messages/on you profile to say that's what you do is all that's needed as the ladies are more likely to actually read your profile anyway
Problem solved it's really that simple awwww hey dont think that's a fair assumption if their were the same ratios men to women yes but their are probably 4 or 5 times as many men to women "That's just based on my experience as a bi lady that's been part of a couple as well as now on the site as a single, women generally read and show theyve read the profile a lot more, followed closely by couples, and unfortunately men rank lowest in that regard, doesn't mean all men however I've certainly found ones that do, you aren't all illerate twats that cant be arsed to read | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"No I don't think knowing that I comes before E except after C determines how good of a fuck you will or won't be But knowing that one is 5'8" guy and in his 50s is not going to get him a fuck with me, so why bother writing to me? Can he not read?
- Mrs. J -
He can read he just can't be arsed to,
Good news is however there is an age filter that you can set, so then You don't need to worry about men in their over 50s messaging you because they're unable to. Of course if you were literate enough to read the sites new starter tips or FAQs you'd know that already
We think we can read and have therefore set our age filters from 30 to 60 as we want to meet women between 30 to 60. Can you please read and tell us how to set the age filters separately for men between 35 to 45 as we only want to meet men between 35 to 45 years old. Please, pretty please
We couldn't find any drop-down to set separate age filters so we wrote it quite explicitly within our profile text where we mentioned meeting single men
Eagerly awaiting your reply
- Mrs. J -
So set the filters to control the men side of things and look for the ladies yourself a quick note in messages/on you profile to say that's what you do is all that's needed as the ladies are more likely to actually read your profile anyway
Problem solved it's really that simple
Oh, stupid us. So we restrict the ages for couples and single women when it is them we are primarly looking to meet. Great idea
Our profile gets read by 100s of men, a few couples and maybe two or three women per week. Your 'suggestion' makes perfect sense
- Mrs. J -
It will do to someone that doesn't clearly have a bee in their bonnet
Are you suggesting that we filter out women between the ages of 30-35 and 45-60 when it is them and couples that we primarily want to meet and by doing that, we don't appear in their searches either? Very clever strategy for having a profile on this site to filter out the very people one primarily wants to meet
I don't think we will follow your clever 'suggestion'
- Mrs. J -
That's fine no one said you had too but I manage it just fine practicing what I preach in that regard so it at least works for me. You may not appear in their searches but they can in yours. Heaven forbid you have to do a bit more leg work yourself to get a shag hey
But you are only looking for single men, so ofcourse it works for you
We were primarily looking for women and couples and would have liked to meet a couple of single men too
However, with what we have experienced over here, asking for single men appears to be a complete waste of time. So, we have now blocked that category and will look for them in a club when we visit. It isn't as if they are in short supply there
Better solution for us than filtering out people who we are primarily looking to meet
Please don't worry about me getting a 'shag'; I'll be getting one, two or three tonight and tomorrow night and ...
- Mrs J -"No I'm not I just say that to filter my profile they way I like it so I can do the searching myself for ladies and couples. I have that I'm bi sexual so women and couple don't have objections when I message them expressing my interest and explaining why my profile doesn't say I'm specifically looking. I practice what I preach and it works very well hence why I'm verified by a fem if you read my veri summary | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Also, it might only leave boring bigots, who obsess over spelling and grammar, who I don't want to meet. " Being literate doesn't make one a boring bigot. Insisting on literacy before a meet does, however. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"No I don't think knowing that I comes before E except after C determines how good of a fuck you will or won't be But knowing that one is 5'8" guy and in his 50s is not going to get him a fuck with me, so why bother writing to me? Can he not read?
- Mrs. J -
He can read he just can't be arsed to,
Good news is however there is an age filter that you can set, so then You don't need to worry about men in their over 50s messaging you because they're unable to. Of course if you were literate enough to read the sites new starter tips or FAQs you'd know that already
We think we can read and have therefore set our age filters from 30 to 60 as we want to meet women between 30 to 60. Can you please read and tell us how to set the age filters separately for men between 35 to 45 as we only want to meet men between 35 to 45 years old. Please, pretty please
We couldn't find any drop-down to set separate age filters so we wrote it quite explicitly within our profile text where we mentioned meeting single men
Eagerly awaiting your reply
- Mrs. J -
So set the filters to control the men side of things and look for the ladies yourself a quick note in messages/on you profile to say that's what you do is all that's needed as the ladies are more likely to actually read your profile anyway
Problem solved it's really that simple
Oh, stupid us. So we restrict the ages for couples and single women when it is them we are primarly looking to meet. Great idea
Our profile gets read by 100s of men, a few couples and maybe two or three women per week. Your 'suggestion' makes perfect sense
- Mrs. J -
It will do to someone that doesn't clearly have a bee in their bonnet
Are you suggesting that we filter out women between the ages of 30-35 and 45-60 when it is them and couples that we primarily want to meet and by doing that, we don't appear in their searches either? Very clever strategy for having a profile on this site to filter out the very people one primarily wants to meet
I don't think we will follow your clever 'suggestion'
- Mrs. J -
That's fine no one said you had too but I manage it just fine practicing what I preach in that regard so it at least works for me. You may not appear in their searches but they can in yours. Heaven forbid you have to do a bit more leg work yourself to get a shag hey
But you are only looking for single men, so ofcourse it works for you
We were primarily looking for women and couples and would have liked to meet a couple of single men too
However, with what we have experienced over here, asking for single men appears to be a complete waste of time. So, we have now blocked that category and will look for them in a club when we visit. It isn't as if they are in short supply there
Better solution for us than filtering out people who we are primarily looking to meet
Please don't worry about me getting a 'shag'; I'll be getting one, two or three tonight and tomorrow night and ...
- Mrs J -
No I'm not I just say that to filter my profile they way I like it so I can do the searching myself for ladies and couples. I have that I'm bi sexual so women and couple don't have objections when I message them expressing my interest and explaining why my profile doesn't say I'm specifically looking. I practice what I preach and it works very well hence why I'm verified by a fem if you read my veri summary "So are we; verified by a 'fem'. We've only been here five weeks so hoping to meet as many here as we do in clubs Our query to your suggestion that we probably cannot read the FAQs to set age filters was, how does one do that separately for different categories? You have suggested that we filter out the superset in favour of the subset when we are primarily looking to meet the superset. So, basically, there isn't any way to do it, correct? - Mrs. J - | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Also, it might only leave boring bigots, who obsess over spelling and grammar, who I don't want to meet. Being literate doesn't make one a boring bigot. Insisting on literacy before a meet does, however." I said "might" because I wouldn't want to join a swingers' site that insisted on a literacy test, before being allowed to join. I would make the assumption that the people who did join were anal about it, and that would make them boring, to me. It wouldn't be a group I would want to join. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"No I don't think knowing that I comes before E except after C determines how good of a fuck you will or won't be But knowing that one is 5'8" guy and in his 50s is not going to get him a fuck with me, so why bother writing to me? Can he not read?
- Mrs. J -
He can read he just can't be arsed to,
Good news is however there is an age filter that you can set, so then You don't need to worry about men in their over 50s messaging you because they're unable to. Of course if you were literate enough to read the sites new starter tips or FAQs you'd know that already
We think we can read and have therefore set our age filters from 30 to 60 as we want to meet women between 30 to 60. Can you please read and tell us how to set the age filters separately for men between 35 to 45 as we only want to meet men between 35 to 45 years old. Please, pretty please
We couldn't find any drop-down to set separate age filters so we wrote it quite explicitly within our profile text where we mentioned meeting single men
Eagerly awaiting your reply
- Mrs. J -
So set the filters to control the men side of things and look for the ladies yourself a quick note in messages/on you profile to say that's what you do is all that's needed as the ladies are more likely to actually read your profile anyway
Problem solved it's really that simple
Oh, stupid us. So we restrict the ages for couples and single women when it is them we are primarly looking to meet. Great idea
Our profile gets read by 100s of men, a few couples and maybe two or three women per week. Your 'suggestion' makes perfect sense
- Mrs. J -
It will do to someone that doesn't clearly have a bee in their bonnet
Are you suggesting that we filter out women between the ages of 30-35 and 45-60 when it is them and couples that we primarily want to meet and by doing that, we don't appear in their searches either? Very clever strategy for having a profile on this site to filter out the very people one primarily wants to meet
I don't think we will follow your clever 'suggestion'
- Mrs. J -
That's fine no one said you had too but I manage it just fine practicing what I preach in that regard so it at least works for me. You may not appear in their searches but they can in yours. Heaven forbid you have to do a bit more leg work yourself to get a shag hey
But you are only looking for single men, so ofcourse it works for you
We were primarily looking for women and couples and would have liked to meet a couple of single men too
However, with what we have experienced over here, asking for single men appears to be a complete waste of time. So, we have now blocked that category and will look for them in a club when we visit. It isn't as if they are in short supply there
Better solution for us than filtering out people who we are primarily looking to meet
Please don't worry about me getting a 'shag'; I'll be getting one, two or three tonight and tomorrow night and ...
- Mrs J -
No I'm not I just say that to filter my profile they way I like it so I can do the searching myself for ladies and couples. I have that I'm bi sexual so women and couple don't have objections when I message them expressing my interest and explaining why my profile doesn't say I'm specifically looking. I practice what I preach and it works very well hence why I'm verified by a fem if you read my veri summary
So are we; verified by a 'fem'. We've only been here five weeks so hoping to meet as many here as we do in clubs
Our query to your suggestion that we probably cannot read the FAQs to set age filters was, how does one do that separately for different categories? You have suggested that we filter out the superset in favour of the subset when we are primarily looking to meet the superset. So, basically, there isn't any way to do it, correct?
- Mrs. J -"I've already said how you do it but I'll repeat myself yet again You filter out and look for yourself and it works! it's simple! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"No I don't think knowing that I comes before E except after C determines how good of a fuck you will or won't be But knowing that one is 5'8" guy and in his 50s is not going to get him a fuck with me, so why bother writing to me? Can he not read?
- Mrs. J -
He can read he just can't be arsed to,
Good news is however there is an age filter that you can set, so then You don't need to worry about men in their over 50s messaging you because they're unable to. Of course if you were literate enough to read the sites new starter tips or FAQs you'd know that already
We think we can read and have therefore set our age filters from 30 to 60 as we want to meet women between 30 to 60. Can you please read and tell us how to set the age filters separately for men between 35 to 45 as we only want to meet men between 35 to 45 years old. Please, pretty please
We couldn't find any drop-down to set separate age filters so we wrote it quite explicitly within our profile text where we mentioned meeting single men
Eagerly awaiting your reply
- Mrs. J -
So set the filters to control the men side of things and look for the ladies yourself a quick note in messages/on you profile to say that's what you do is all that's needed as the ladies are more likely to actually read your profile anyway
Problem solved it's really that simple
Oh, stupid us. So we restrict the ages for couples and single women when it is them we are primarly looking to meet. Great idea
Our profile gets read by 100s of men, a few couples and maybe two or three women per week. Your 'suggestion' makes perfect sense
- Mrs. J -
It will do to someone that doesn't clearly have a bee in their bonnet
Are you suggesting that we filter out women between the ages of 30-35 and 45-60 when it is them and couples that we primarily want to meet and by doing that, we don't appear in their searches either? Very clever strategy for having a profile on this site to filter out the very people one primarily wants to meet
I don't think we will follow your clever 'suggestion'
- Mrs. J -
That's fine no one said you had too but I manage it just fine practicing what I preach in that regard so it at least works for me. You may not appear in their searches but they can in yours. Heaven forbid you have to do a bit more leg work yourself to get a shag hey
But you are only looking for single men, so ofcourse it works for you
We were primarily looking for women and couples and would have liked to meet a couple of single men too
However, with what we have experienced over here, asking for single men appears to be a complete waste of time. So, we have now blocked that category and will look for them in a club when we visit. It isn't as if they are in short supply there
Better solution for us than filtering out people who we are primarily looking to meet
Please don't worry about me getting a 'shag'; I'll be getting one, two or three tonight and tomorrow night and ...
- Mrs J -
No I'm not I just say that to filter my profile they way I like it so I can do the searching myself for ladies and couples. I have that I'm bi sexual so women and couple don't have objections when I message them expressing my interest and explaining why my profile doesn't say I'm specifically looking. I practice what I preach and it works very well hence why I'm verified by a fem if you read my veri summary
So are we; verified by a 'fem'. We've only been here five weeks so hoping to meet as many here as we do in clubs
Our query to your suggestion that we probably cannot read the FAQs to set age filters was, how does one do that separately for different categories? You have suggested that we filter out the superset in favour of the subset when we are primarily looking to meet the superset. So, basically, there isn't any way to do it, correct?
- Mrs. J -
I've already said how you do it but I'll repeat myself yet again
You filter out and look for yourself and it works! it's simple!
"Yes we did read your 'suggestion' of looking for the few women and couples here, who we primarly want to meet, ourselves by filtering them out from our profile. Thanks for that marvellous suggestion I think we will keep our age filters as these are and as we read on the FAQs when we set up our profile
- Mrs. J - | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"No I don't think knowing that I comes before E except after C determines how good of a fuck you will or won't be But knowing that one is 5'8" guy and in his 50s is not going to get him a fuck with me, so why bother writing to me? Can he not read?
- Mrs. J -
He can read he just can't be arsed to,
Good news is however there is an age filter that you can set, so then You don't need to worry about men in their over 50s messaging you because they're unable to. Of course if you were literate enough to read the sites new starter tips or FAQs you'd know that already
We think we can read and have therefore set our age filters from 30 to 60 as we want to meet women between 30 to 60. Can you please read and tell us how to set the age filters separately for men between 35 to 45 as we only want to meet men between 35 to 45 years old. Please, pretty please
We couldn't find any drop-down to set separate age filters so we wrote it quite explicitly within our profile text where we mentioned meeting single men
Eagerly awaiting your reply
- Mrs. J -
So set the filters to control the men side of things and look for the ladies yourself a quick note in messages/on you profile to say that's what you do is all that's needed as the ladies are more likely to actually read your profile anyway
Problem solved it's really that simple
Oh, stupid us. So we restrict the ages for couples and single women when it is them we are primarly looking to meet. Great idea
Our profile gets read by 100s of men, a few couples and maybe two or three women per week. Your 'suggestion' makes perfect sense
- Mrs. J -
It will do to someone that doesn't clearly have a bee in their bonnet
Are you suggesting that we filter out women between the ages of 30-35 and 45-60 when it is them and couples that we primarily want to meet and by doing that, we don't appear in their searches either? Very clever strategy for having a profile on this site to filter out the very people one primarily wants to meet
I don't think we will follow your clever 'suggestion'
- Mrs. J -
That's fine no one said you had too but I manage it just fine practicing what I preach in that regard so it at least works for me. You may not appear in their searches but they can in yours. Heaven forbid you have to do a bit more leg work yourself to get a shag hey
But you are only looking for single men, so ofcourse it works for you
We were primarily looking for women and couples and would have liked to meet a couple of single men too
However, with what we have experienced over here, asking for single men appears to be a complete waste of time. So, we have now blocked that category and will look for them in a club when we visit. It isn't as if they are in short supply there
Better solution for us than filtering out people who we are primarily looking to meet
Please don't worry about me getting a 'shag'; I'll be getting one, two or three tonight and tomorrow night and ...
- Mrs J -
No I'm not I just say that to filter my profile they way I like it so I can do the searching myself for ladies and couples. I have that I'm bi sexual so women and couple don't have objections when I message them expressing my interest and explaining why my profile doesn't say I'm specifically looking. I practice what I preach and it works very well hence why I'm verified by a fem if you read my veri summary
So are we; verified by a 'fem'. We've only been here five weeks so hoping to meet as many here as we do in clubs
Our query to your suggestion that we probably cannot read the FAQs to set age filters was, how does one do that separately for different categories? You have suggested that we filter out the superset in favour of the subset when we are primarily looking to meet the superset. So, basically, there isn't any way to do it, correct?
- Mrs. J -
I've already said how you do it but I'll repeat myself yet again
You filter out and look for yourself and it works! it's simple!
Yes we did read your 'suggestion' of looking for the few women and couples here, who we primarly want to meet, ourselves by filtering them out from our profile. Thanks for that marvellous suggestion
I think we will keep our age filters as these are and as we read on the FAQs when we set up our profile
- Mrs. J -"Well at least then you've got something that's easily fixed so completely trivial to continue to bitch about Good day to you and good luck to you feeling you'll need it | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"What does illiterate mean to you ? " Is it to do with someone's frequency of little illnesses? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"No I don't think knowing that I comes before E except after C determines how good of a fuck you will or won't be But knowing that one is 5'8" guy and in his 50s is not going to get him a fuck with me, so why bother writing to me? Can he not read?
- Mrs. J -
He can read he just can't be arsed to,
Good news is however there is an age filter that you can set, so then You don't need to worry about men in their over 50s messaging you because they're unable to. Of course if you were literate enough to read the sites new starter tips or FAQs you'd know that already
We think we can read and have therefore set our age filters from 30 to 60 as we want to meet women between 30 to 60. Can you please read and tell us how to set the age filters separately for men between 35 to 45 as we only want to meet men between 35 to 45 years old. Please, pretty please
We couldn't find any drop-down to set separate age filters so we wrote it quite explicitly within our profile text where we mentioned meeting single men
Eagerly awaiting your reply
- Mrs. J -
So set the filters to control the men side of things and look for the ladies yourself a quick note in messages/on you profile to say that's what you do is all that's needed as the ladies are more likely to actually read your profile anyway
Problem solved it's really that simple
Oh, stupid us. So we restrict the ages for couples and single women when it is them we are primarly looking to meet. Great idea
Our profile gets read by 100s of men, a few couples and maybe two or three women per week. Your 'suggestion' makes perfect sense
- Mrs. J -
It will do to someone that doesn't clearly have a bee in their bonnet
Are you suggesting that we filter out women between the ages of 30-35 and 45-60 when it is them and couples that we primarily want to meet and by doing that, we don't appear in their searches either? Very clever strategy for having a profile on this site to filter out the very people one primarily wants to meet
I don't think we will follow your clever 'suggestion'
- Mrs. J -
That's fine no one said you had too but I manage it just fine practicing what I preach in that regard so it at least works for me. You may not appear in their searches but they can in yours. Heaven forbid you have to do a bit more leg work yourself to get a shag hey
But you are only looking for single men, so ofcourse it works for you
We were primarily looking for women and couples and would have liked to meet a couple of single men too
However, with what we have experienced over here, asking for single men appears to be a complete waste of time. So, we have now blocked that category and will look for them in a club when we visit. It isn't as if they are in short supply there
Better solution for us than filtering out people who we are primarily looking to meet
Please don't worry about me getting a 'shag'; I'll be getting one, two or three tonight and tomorrow night and ...
- Mrs J -
No I'm not I just say that to filter my profile they way I like it so I can do the searching myself for ladies and couples. I have that I'm bi sexual so women and couple don't have objections when I message them expressing my interest and explaining why my profile doesn't say I'm specifically looking. I practice what I preach and it works very well hence why I'm verified by a fem if you read my veri summary
So are we; verified by a 'fem'. We've only been here five weeks so hoping to meet as many here as we do in clubs
Our query to your suggestion that we probably cannot read the FAQs to set age filters was, how does one do that separately for different categories? You have suggested that we filter out the superset in favour of the subset when we are primarily looking to meet the superset. So, basically, there isn't any way to do it, correct?
- Mrs. J -
I've already said how you do it but I'll repeat myself yet again
You filter out and look for yourself and it works! it's simple!
Yes we did read your 'suggestion' of looking for the few women and couples here, who we primarly want to meet, ourselves by filtering them out from our profile. Thanks for that marvellous suggestion
I think we will keep our age filters as these are and as we read on the FAQs when we set up our profile
- Mrs. J -
Well at least then you've got something that's easily fixed so completely trivial to continue to bitch about
Good day to you and good luck to you feeling you'll need it
"And to you too. We are not bitching. It was you telling us that we don't even know how to read FAQs. Seems like it was the other way around and then you tried to justify your comment by suggesting weird and wonderful 'work-aounds' which would have left our profile completely useless to our primary target audience. But thanks for those; it made us smile
- Mrs. J - | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"What does illiterate mean to you ? Is it to do with someone's frequency of little illnesses? "There seems to be an Illiterati on here | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"What does illiterate mean to you ? Is it to do with someone's frequency of little illnesses?
There seems to be an Illiterati on here
"Clitterati in some cases. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"No I don't think knowing that I comes before E except after C determines how good of a fuck you will or won't be But knowing that one is 5'8" guy and in his 50s is not going to get him a fuck with me, so why bother writing to me? Can he not read?
- Mrs. J -
He can read he just can't be arsed to,
Good news is however there is an age filter that you can set, so then You don't need to worry about men in their over 50s messaging you because they're unable to. Of course if you were literate enough to read the sites new starter tips or FAQs you'd know that already
We think we can read and have therefore set our age filters from 30 to 60 as we want to meet women between 30 to 60. Can you please read and tell us how to set the age filters separately for men between 35 to 45 as we only want to meet men between 35 to 45 years old. Please, pretty please
We couldn't find any drop-down to set separate age filters so we wrote it quite explicitly within our profile text where we mentioned meeting single men
Eagerly awaiting your reply
- Mrs. J -
So set the filters to control the men side of things and look for the ladies yourself a quick note in messages/on you profile to say that's what you do is all that's needed as the ladies are more likely to actually read your profile anyway
Problem solved it's really that simple awwww hey dont think that's a fair assumption if their were the same ratios men to women yes but their are probably 4 or 5 times as many men to women
That's just based on my experience as a bi lady that's been part of a couple as well as now on the site as a single, women generally read and show theyve read the profile a lot more, followed closely by couples, and unfortunately men rank lowest in that regard, doesn't mean all men however I've certainly found ones that do, you aren't all illerate twats that cant be arsed to read "glad I'm not a twat lol | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" Well if you wish to create exclusivity maybe? But where are you going to draw the line? Only people with low BMI, further education only, financially secure? The list goes on. Surely the site is meant to represent a cross section of society, or in other words all walks of life? The experience is about engaging with all sorts, regardless of attraction or connectivity then making choices? There's far more intelligent people in here than myself and I quite like the fact they engage with me and I learn from all walks." Can you elaborate on this further? Are you truly suggesting that I meet with a short mid-50s men before making a choice?
- Mrs. J - | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Do you think it should be compulsory to join this site? The number of illiterate men on this site is staggering - Mrs. J -" Compulsery goodness no. Yes it can be a little annoying but you'd also have to think about people who are Dyslexic would it be fair on them | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"No I don't think knowing that I comes before E except after C determines how good of a fuck you will or won't be But knowing that one is 5'8" guy and in his 50s is not going to get him a fuck with me, so why bother writing to me? Can he not read?
- Mrs. J -
He can read he just can't be arsed to,
Good news is however there is an age filter that you can set, so then You don't need to worry about men in their over 50s messaging you because they're unable to. Of course if you were literate enough to read the sites new starter tips or FAQs you'd know that already
We think we can read and have therefore set our age filters from 30 to 60 as we want to meet women between 30 to 60. Can you please read and tell us how to set the age filters separately for men between 35 to 45 as we only want to meet men between 35 to 45 years old. Please, pretty please
We couldn't find any drop-down to set separate age filters so we wrote it quite explicitly within our profile text where we mentioned meeting single men
Eagerly awaiting your reply
- Mrs. J -
So set the filters to control the men side of things and look for the ladies yourself a quick note in messages/on you profile to say that's what you do is all that's needed as the ladies are more likely to actually read your profile anyway
Problem solved it's really that simple awwww hey dont think that's a fair assumption if their were the same ratios men to women yes but their are probably 4 or 5 times as many men to women
That's just based on my experience as a bi lady that's been part of a couple as well as now on the site as a single, women generally read and show theyve read the profile a lot more, followed closely by couples, and unfortunately men rank lowest in that regard, doesn't mean all men however I've certainly found ones that do, you aren't all illerate twats that cant be arsed to read glad I'm not a twat lol"Well you are but at least your one that knows how to read hey?
And yes I'm fully aware I have to pay for that comment
It's why I made it | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"This is nothing but a poorly veiled single men are arseholes thread We really didn't need another one of those " Nope, but that is what your are itching to make it out to be
- Mrs. J - | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I would personally be very happy if there was a tutorial showing people how to edit posts they're quoting to prevent me from having to strain my scroll finger going past arguments. "Me too | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I would personally be very happy if there was a tutorial showing people how to edit posts they're quoting" Move cursor to within the square brackets. Delete any extraneous text. Add your bit at the end. You can get fancy with embedding different quotes " like this " using additional bracketing. Tutorial done. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"No I don't think a literacy test should be mandatory. Excluding people from a site like this because they struggle with reading, writing and spelling is exclusive and not what swinging should be about in my opinion. It's very easy to filter those one doesn't want to meet, for whatever reason." I may be wrong,but I think it's just a gripe about men not reading their profile,more than the fact he can't spell. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Do you think it should be compulsory to join this site? The number of illiterate men on this site is staggering - Mrs. J - Have you checked your own profile or is this a fun thread rather than a serious one ? Yes. Have you checked yours? - Mrs. J - Im not the person being critical of others. That's you. Your status update is what i read, i didn't read your profile. Oh, you mean, "We are at S Private club on Friday 26th and would like to meet with some nice friendly people. Please say "hi" if you are planning to be thre too. E&J". Thanks, we've corrected the typo where "there" was mistyped as "thre" - Mrs. J -" No, says 'ther' now, think it has an 'e' on the end. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I would personally be very happy if there was a tutorial showing people how to edit posts they're quoting Move cursor to within the square brackets. Delete any extraneous text. Add your bit at the end. You can get fancy with embedding different quotes like this using additional bracketing. Tutorial done. "Simple on a desktop; blue murder on an iPhone with a teensy weensy screen and no pointing device - Mrs. J - | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I would personally be very happy if there was a tutorial showing people how to edit posts they're quoting Move cursor to within the square brackets. Delete any extraneous text. Add your bit at the end. You can get fancy with embedding different quotes like this using additional bracketing. Tutorial done.
Simple on a desktop; blue murder on an iPhone with a teensy weensy screen and no pointing device
- Mrs. J -"Really? I just did it on my Android phone using my thumb as the pointing device (other digits are available). | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I may be wrong,but I think it's just a gripe about men not reading their profile,more than the fact he can't spell." No, that's quite clearly what it is to me. Oh well. It's a novel approach. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I would personally be very happy if there was a tutorial showing people how to edit posts they're quoting to prevent me from having to strain my scroll finger going past arguments. "I would welcome that, because I don't know how to do that! Any advise welcome. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"No I don't think a literacy test should be mandatory. Excluding people from a site like this because they struggle with reading, writing and spelling is exclusive and not what swinging should be about in my opinion. It's very easy to filter those one doesn't want to meet, for whatever reason. I may be wrong,but I think it's just a gripe about men not reading their profile,more than the fact he can't spell." Oh. Men don't read ours neither do couples come to that | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I would personally be very happy if there was a tutorial showing people how to edit posts they're quoting Move cursor to within the square brackets. Delete any extraneous text. Add your bit at the end. You can get fancy with embedding different quotes like this using additional bracketing. Tutorial done.
Simple on a desktop; blue murder on an iPhone with a teensy weensy screen and no pointing device
- Mrs. J -
Really? I just did it on my Android phone using my thumb as the pointing device (other digits are available). "I didn't say it can't be done. I said it wad simple on a desktop - Mrs. J - | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I would personally be very happy if there was a tutorial showing people how to edit posts they're quoting to prevent me from having to strain my scroll finger going past arguments.
I would welcome that, because I don't know how to do that! Any advise welcome. "Ooh, someone beat me to it, thank you. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I may be wrong,but I think it's just a gripe about men not reading their profile,more than the fact he can't spell. No, that's quite clearly what it is to me. Oh well. It's a novel approach." Yep As I said a poorly veiled single men are arseholes thread | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"No I don't think a literacy test should be mandatory. Excluding people from a site like this because they struggle with reading, writing and spelling is exclusive and not what swinging should be about in my opinion. It's very easy to filter those one doesn't want to meet, for whatever reason. I may be wrong,but I think it's just a gripe about men not reading their profile,more than the fact he can't spell. Oh. Men don't read ours neither do couples come to that "It's probably just selective reading . I do it myself,you know that profile that say's they just want beautiful women with big boob's to message them,I just think stuff it I'll message anyway | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"No I don't think knowing that I comes before E except after C determines how good of a fuck you will or won't be But knowing that one is 5'8" guy and in his 50s is not going to get him a fuck with me, so why bother writing to me? Can he not read?
- Mrs. J -
He can read he just can't be arsed to,
Good news is however there is an age filter that you can set, so then You don't need to worry about men in their over 50s messaging you because they're unable to. Of course if you were literate enough to read the sites new starter tips or FAQs you'd know that already
We think we can read and have therefore set our age filters from 30 to 60 as we want to meet women between 30 to 60. Can you please read and tell us how to set the age filters separately for men between 35 to 45 as we only want to meet men between 35 to 45 years old. Please, pretty please
We couldn't find any drop-down to set separate age filters so we wrote it quite explicitly within our profile text where we mentioned meeting single men
Eagerly awaiting your reply
- Mrs. J -
So set the filters to control the men side of things and look for the ladies yourself a quick note in messages/on you profile to say that's what you do is all that's needed as the ladies are more likely to actually read your profile anyway
Problem solved it's really that simple awwww hey dont think that's a fair assumption if their were the same ratios men to women yes but their are probably 4 or 5 times as many men to women
That's just based on my experience as a bi lady that's been part of a couple as well as now on the site as a single, women generally read and show theyve read the profile a lot more, followed closely by couples, and unfortunately men rank lowest in that regard, doesn't mean all men however I've certainly found ones that do, you aren't all illerate twats that cant be arsed to read "yes but have you done a survey to come to this conclusion or are you just generalising as the OP has ,I always read profiles and base any message I send on their write up and any sensible guy does ,I think once again its the few spoiling it for the majority damnit | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"No I don't think knowing that I comes before E except after C determines how good of a fuck you will or won't be But knowing that one is 5'8" guy and in his 50s is not going to get him a fuck with me, so why bother writing to me? Can he not read?
- Mrs. J -
He can read he just can't be arsed to,
Good news is however there is an age filter that you can set, so then You don't need to worry about men in their over 50s messaging you because they're unable to. Of course if you were literate enough to read the sites new starter tips or FAQs you'd know that already
We think we can read and have therefore set our age filters from 30 to 60 as we want to meet women between 30 to 60. Can you please read and tell us how to set the age filters separately for men between 35 to 45 as we only want to meet men between 35 to 45 years old. Please, pretty please
We couldn't find any drop-down to set separate age filters so we wrote it quite explicitly within our profile text where we mentioned meeting single men
Eagerly awaiting your reply
- Mrs. J -
So set the filters to control the men side of things and look for the ladies yourself a quick note in messages/on you profile to say that's what you do is all that's needed as the ladies are more likely to actually read your profile anyway
Problem solved it's really that simple awwww hey dont think that's a fair assumption if their were the same ratios men to women yes but their are probably 4 or 5 times as many men to women
That's just based on my experience as a bi lady that's been part of a couple as well as now on the site as a single, women generally read and show theyve read the profile a lot more, followed closely by couples, and unfortunately men rank lowest in that regard, doesn't mean all men however I've certainly found ones that do, you aren't all illerate twats that cant be arsed to read glad I'm not a twat lol
Well you are but at least your one that knows how to read hey?
And yes I'm fully aware I have to pay for that comment
It's why I made it "and to.igjt I might x | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
""I would personally be very happy if there was a tutorial showing people how to edit posts they're quoting "
Move cursor to within the square brackets. Delete any extraneous text. Add your bit at the end. You can get fancy with embedding different quotes
" like this "
using additional bracketing. Tutorial done."Oh, I know how to do it. I just wish others did. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Can I just ask what 'youse' is supposed to be? I'm not up on text speak but I saw it yesterday & couldn't fathom what it meant Thanks Sorry to hijack the literacy thread "Well in our neck of the woods, 'youse' just means you but in a plural sense. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| back to top |  |
