Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to The Lounge |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's often said that some expect Brad Pitt but are themselves offering an unequal match etc. Convert the ratings (out of 10) for men to women or women to men etc, as typical values. What is a guy scoring 5 out of 10 able to convert to on Fab? " Probably a night home alone lol | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's often said that some expect Brad Pitt but are themselves offering an unequal match etc. Convert the ratings (out of 10) for men to women or women to men etc, as typical values. What is a guy scoring 5 out of 10 able to convert to on Fab? " Probably an 11, if some of the self-styled "slim or athletic build, good looking" are any indication!  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's often said that some expect Brad Pitt but are themselves offering an unequal match etc. Convert the ratings (out of 10) for men to women or women to men etc, as typical values. What is a guy scoring 5 out of 10 able to convert to on Fab? " I'm assuming a combination of looks and personality in these scores because my goodness there are some beautiful thick people but anyway: A man who is a 10 on fab can expect to get 1 meet with with a female who is a 10 and 3 with 7's over a 12 month period. A man who is a 7 is likely to get 1 woman a year who is also a 7 given enough effort. If he is so inclined then he could probably get upto 3 ladies who are below 5. A woman who is a 3 can get as many men upto 6 as she pleases. Probably a lot of 7's too. Men with social skills will do better at clubs and most men will do better in vanilla dating than on fab. Given the ratios it may just be better for men who are 7's and below to go on as many vanilla dates as possible, propose sex and just expect the odd glass of wine to be thrown back at you. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's often said that some expect Brad Pitt but are themselves offering an unequal match etc. Convert the ratings (out of 10) for men to women or women to men etc, as typical values. What is a guy scoring 5 out of 10 able to convert to on Fab? I'm assuming a combination of looks and personality in these scores because my goodness there are some beautiful thick people but anyway: A man who is a 10 on fab can expect to get 1 meet with with a female who is a 10 and 3 with 7's over a 12 month period. A man who is a 7 is likely to get 1 woman a year who is also a 7 given enough effort. If he is so inclined then he could probably get upto 3 ladies who are below 5. A woman who is a 3 can get as many men upto 6 as she pleases. Probably a lot of 7's too. Men with social skills will do better at clubs and most men will do better in vanilla dating than on fab. Given the ratios it may just be better for men who are 7's and below to go on as many vanilla dates as possible, propose sex and just expect the odd glass of wine to be thrown back at you. " 
Interesting.
How do you think this ratio works for couples would it be some kind of combination ratio so the male is say a 5 and the female an 8 does this give them a combined couple score of 6.5, ( their combined score divide by 2), so they could be punching above as the female is an 8 and this whole site seems to centre around the females.
Is it fair to say then that if another couple have a female who is a 5 and a male who's an 8 then they still have a combined score of 6.5 but would probably be realistically looking at couples in the 6.5 or below brackets?
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's often said that some expect Brad Pitt but are themselves offering an unequal match etc. Convert the ratings (out of 10) for men to women or women to men etc, as typical values. What is a guy scoring 5 out of 10 able to convert to on Fab? I'm assuming a combination of looks and personality in these scores because my goodness there are some beautiful thick people but anyway: A man who is a 10 on fab can expect to get 1 meet with with a female who is a 10 and 3 with 7's over a 12 month period. A man who is a 7 is likely to get 1 woman a year who is also a 7 given enough effort. If he is so inclined then he could probably get upto 3 ladies who are below 5. A woman who is a 3 can get as many men upto 6 as she pleases. Probably a lot of 7's too. Men with social skills will do better at clubs and most men will do better in vanilla dating than on fab. Given the ratios it may just be better for men who are 7's and below to go on as many vanilla dates as possible, propose sex and just expect the odd glass of wine to be thrown back at you.
Interesting.
How do you think this ratio works for couples would it be some kind of combination ratio so the male is say a 5 and the female an 8 does this give them a combined couple score of 6.5, ( their combined score divide by 2), so they could be punching above as the female is an 8 and this whole site seems to centre around the females.
Is it fair to say then that if another couple have a female who is a 5 and a male who's an 8 then they still have a combined score of 6.5 but would probably be realistically looking at couples in the 6.5 or below brackets?
"Basically you need to apply a weighting to the male and female individual scores and the weighting will be different depending on whether the female of the other couple is bi or not. So you weight the male by 0.85 and female by 1.15 in ordindary circumstances but if the female of the other couple is bi then you adjust the female weighting to 1.3. So a male who is 5 and female 8 have a combined score of 6.7 but another couple who are 7.3 may accept them as equals if the latter couple has a very bi female. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's often said that some expect Brad Pitt but are themselves offering an unequal match etc. Convert the ratings (out of 10) for men to women or women to men etc, as typical values. What is a guy scoring 5 out of 10 able to convert to on Fab? I'm assuming a combination of looks and personality in these scores because my goodness there are some beautiful thick people but anyway: A man who is a 10 on fab can expect to get 1 meet with with a female who is a 10 and 3 with 7's over a 12 month period. A man who is a 7 is likely to get 1 woman a year who is also a 7 given enough effort. If he is so inclined then he could probably get upto 3 ladies who are below 5. A woman who is a 3 can get as many men upto 6 as she pleases. Probably a lot of 7's too. Men with social skills will do better at clubs and most men will do better in vanilla dating than on fab. Given the ratios it may just be better for men who are 7's and below to go on as many vanilla dates as possible, propose sex and just expect the odd glass of wine to be thrown back at you.
Interesting.
How do you think this ratio works for couples would it be some kind of combination ratio so the male is say a 5 and the female an 8 does this give them a combined couple score of 6.5, ( their combined score divide by 2), so they could be punching above as the female is an 8 and this whole site seems to centre around the females.
Is it fair to say then that if another couple have a female who is a 5 and a male who's an 8 then they still have a combined score of 6.5 but would probably be realistically looking at couples in the 6.5 or below brackets?
Basically you need to apply a weighting to the male and female individual scores and the weighting will be different depending on whether the female of the other couple is bi or not.
So you weight the male by 0.85 and female by 1.15 in ordindary circumstances but if the female of the other couple is bi then you adjust the female weighting to 1.3.
So a male who is 5 and female 8 have a combined score of 6.7 but another couple who are 7.3 may accept them as equals if the latter couple has a very bi female. "You have put some real thought into this | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's often said that some expect Brad Pitt but are themselves offering an unequal match etc. Convert the ratings (out of 10) for men to women or women to men etc, as typical values. What is a guy scoring 5 out of 10 able to convert to on Fab? I'm assuming a combination of looks and personality in these scores because my goodness there are some beautiful thick people but anyway: A man who is a 10 on fab can expect to get 1 meet with with a female who is a 10 and 3 with 7's over a 12 month period. A man who is a 7 is likely to get 1 woman a year who is also a 7 given enough effort. If he is so inclined then he could probably get upto 3 ladies who are below 5. A woman who is a 3 can get as many men upto 6 as she pleases. Probably a lot of 7's too. Men with social skills will do better at clubs and most men will do better in vanilla dating than on fab. Given the ratios it may just be better for men who are 7's and below to go on as many vanilla dates as possible, propose sex and just expect the odd glass of wine to be thrown back at you.
Interesting.
How do you think this ratio works for couples would it be some kind of combination ratio so the male is say a 5 and the female an 8 does this give them a combined couple score of 6.5, ( their combined score divide by 2), so they could be punching above as the female is an 8 and this whole site seems to centre around the females.
Is it fair to say then that if another couple have a female who is a 5 and a male who's an 8 then they still have a combined score of 6.5 but would probably be realistically looking at couples in the 6.5 or below brackets?
Basically you need to apply a weighting to the male and female individual scores and the weighting will be different depending on whether the female of the other couple is bi or not.
So you weight the male by 0.85 and female by 1.15 in ordindary circumstances but if the female of the other couple is bi then you adjust the female weighting to 1.3.
So a male who is 5 and female 8 have a combined score of 6.7 but another couple who are 7.3 may accept them as equals if the latter couple has a very bi female.
You have put some real thought into this "We have an excel book for deciding who we want to meet | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's often said that some expect Brad Pitt but are themselves offering an unequal match etc. Convert the ratings (out of 10) for men to women or women to men etc, as typical values. What is a guy scoring 5 out of 10 able to convert to on Fab? I'm assuming a combination of looks and personality in these scores because my goodness there are some beautiful thick people but anyway: A man who is a 10 on fab can expect to get 1 meet with with a female who is a 10 and 3 with 7's over a 12 month period. A man who is a 7 is likely to get 1 woman a year who is also a 7 given enough effort. If he is so inclined then he could probably get upto 3 ladies who are below 5. A woman who is a 3 can get as many men upto 6 as she pleases. Probably a lot of 7's too. Men with social skills will do better at clubs and most men will do better in vanilla dating than on fab. Given the ratios it may just be better for men who are 7's and below to go on as many vanilla dates as possible, propose sex and just expect the odd glass of wine to be thrown back at you.
Interesting.
How do you think this ratio works for couples would it be some kind of combination ratio so the male is say a 5 and the female an 8 does this give them a combined couple score of 6.5, ( their combined score divide by 2), so they could be punching above as the female is an 8 and this whole site seems to centre around the females.
Is it fair to say then that if another couple have a female who is a 5 and a male who's an 8 then they still have a combined score of 6.5 but would probably be realistically looking at couples in the 6.5 or below brackets?
Basically you need to apply a weighting to the male and female individual scores and the weighting will be different depending on whether the female of the other couple is bi or not.
So you weight the male by 0.85 and female by 1.15 in ordindary circumstances but if the female of the other couple is bi then you adjust the female weighting to 1.3.
So a male who is 5 and female 8 have a combined score of 6.7 but another couple who are 7.3 may accept them as equals if the latter couple has a very bi female.
You have put some real thought into this
We have an excel book for deciding who we want to meet"Seems perfectly logical to us | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
