FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Dropping standards...?

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

So the M to F ratio has been discussed.

The quantity of mail women get discussed.

So assuming ladies are saturated with offers and opportunities...

I ask this of the gentlemen...

Gents, do you find you lower what you consider to be your standards to facilitate a meet?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It is just a shag

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

*pulls up chair and gets popcorn out*

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"So the M to F ratio has been discussed.

The quantity of mail women get discussed.

So assuming ladies are saturated with offers and opportunities...

I ask this of the gentlemen...

Gents, do you find you lower what you consider to be your standards to facilitate a meet?"

No, never. If I don't click with someone mentally and/or I'm not physically attracted to them then I won't meet

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"*pulls up chair and gets popcorn out* "

Giz some of your popcorn

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I often wonder what the list of demands would be from men, should the ratio be the other way around.

Must be able to accommodate

Must not complain about any of my habits

Must suck to completion

Don't expect foreplay..........

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I think fucking standards are different to relationship ones. Not just physically either.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I often wonder what the list of demands would be from men, should the ratio be the other way around.

Must be able to accommodate

Must not complain about any of my habits

Must suck to completion

Don't expect foreplay..........

"

Must take it up the arse (this needs it's own thread)

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I keep my 3am beer goggle standards.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I think fucking standards are different to relationship ones. Not just physically either.

"

Aye, you don't look at or talk to the mantlepiece when yer poking the fire fs.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *oxy_minxWoman
over a year ago

Scotland - Aberdeen


"It is just a shag "

So that's a yes then

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It is just a shag

So that's a yes then "

No, a shag is a shag.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Just waiting for the know-it-all brigade to rock up...

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Nope as my standards are set, they are what I feel comfortable with and stick with them. Age/looks etc are so subjective to me. I always try to see the beauty in people, so therefore I am attracted to a range of women.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I often wonder what the list of demands would be from men, should the ratio be the other way around.

Must be able to accommodate

Must not complain about any of my habits

Must suck to completion

Don't expect foreplay..........

Must take it up the arse (this needs it's own thread)"

I know it does, but I didn't want to open one, and come across as anti-men

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Just waiting for the know-it-all brigade to rock up... "
Yes, you alwais get them lol

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"So the M to F ratio has been discussed.

The quantity of mail women get discussed.

So assuming ladies are saturated with offers and opportunities...

I ask this of the gentlemen...

Gents, do you find you lower what you consider to be your standards to facilitate a meet?"

What's the point of this?

To make women feel they're only being messaged because men are desperate?

Or for men to feel crap because the women they find attractive aren't what society deems as being socially acceptable to fancy?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"So the M to F ratio has been discussed.

The quantity of mail women get discussed.

So assuming ladies are saturated with offers and opportunities...

I ask this of the gentlemen...

Gents, do you find you lower what you consider to be your standards to facilitate a meet?"

I would rather have a wank than sex with someone I didn't really fancy.

Plus I'm lucky I have met a few nice ladies who are willing to see me for repeat meets so have not had the need to.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *loswingersCouple
over a year ago

Gloucester


"So the M to F ratio has been discussed.

The quantity of mail women get discussed.

So assuming ladies are saturated with offers and opportunities...

I ask this of the gentlemen...

Gents, do you find you lower what you consider to be your standards to facilitate a meet?

What's the point of this?

To make women feel they're only being messaged because men are desperate?

Or for men to feel crap because the women they find attractive aren't what society deems as being socially acceptable to fancy?

"

This is a good point .

It does seem a bit of a pointless post unlesss it is to make us feel a bit crap when we get meets .

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke

Isn't every hole a goal or is that golf?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Nope, I try and up my game.

Hopefully people with similar interests, ideas and mindset will naturally gravitate towards my personality and I to them, as time goes on and more conversation develops.

If we don't 'click', it's not to be.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"So the M to F ratio has been discussed.

The quantity of mail women get discussed.

So assuming ladies are saturated with offers and opportunities...

I ask this of the gentlemen...

Gents, do you find you lower what you consider to be your standards to facilitate a meet?"

What do you think OP as you didn't answer your own question ?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *eachPreacherMan
over a year ago

Kent/London

I have lowered my standards for a few meets and always ended up with a lackluster experience.

I'm normally pretty easy but I've still said no to more meets than I've said yes to.

There are some real weirdo's on here that even I won't go near

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Is anyone going to admit to "lowering their standards"?

Posts like this make me feel like not meeting any more

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Is anyone going to admit to "lowering their standards"?

Posts like this make me feel like not meeting any more

"

^ yes they will.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I often wonder what the list of demands would be from men, should the ratio be the other way around.

Must be able to accommodate

Must not complain about any of my habits

Must suck to completion

Don't expect foreplay..........

"

Hahah

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *kin BohnerMan
over a year ago

derby

No I will not and never have lowered my standards. I've not had many meets in the time I've been on here but I'd sooner that than anything else.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Like anyone is going to admit to it.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *gnitemybodyWoman
over a year ago

Onestepoutofthedoor


"So the M to F ratio has been discussed.

The quantity of mail women get discussed.

So assuming ladies are saturated with offers and opportunities...

I ask this of the gentlemen...

Gents, do you find you lower what you consider to be your standards to facilitate a meet?

What's the point of this?

To make women feel they're only being messaged because men are desperate?

Or for men to feel crap because the women they find attractive aren't what society deems as being socially acceptable to fancy?

"

Yep I agree. I hate it when people start talking about lowering of standards,I don't even know what it really mean's as far as men are concerned. If someone has sex with me does it mean men are lowering their standards?! Don't answer that...

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"So the M to F ratio has been discussed.

The quantity of mail women get discussed.

So assuming ladies are saturated with offers and opportunities...

I ask this of the gentlemen...

Gents, do you find you lower what you consider to be your standards to facilitate a meet?

What's the point of this? "


"

It's to establish if the sites environment effects what a chap outside of this environment would choose.

"

To make women feel they're only being messaged because men are desperate?


"

no - I'm interested in the sites artificial ecosystem and it's balance and the effect on mens and women's perception of each other

"

Or for men to feel crap because the women they find attractive aren't what society deems as being socially acceptable to fancy?


" no - I want to know if that social convention is magnified here due to the conditions.

Realistically we are none of us perfect... that said some verifications are breaching the trade descriptions act... primarily imo... because of the sites environment.

"

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Like anyone is going to admit to it."

Exactly

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *gnitemybodyWoman
over a year ago

Onestepoutofthedoor

So lowering your standards mean's someone you don't find attractive?!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Hell no. Im a quality over quantity guy... even if I do have a fair few verifications

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Not sure how is possible to have sex with someone you don't fancy?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Absolutely not, if anything it's strengthened my resolve not to resort to the lowest common denominator.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"So the M to F ratio has been discussed.

The quantity of mail women get discussed.

So assuming ladies are saturated with offers and opportunities...

I ask this of the gentlemen...

Gents, do you find you lower what you consider to be your standards to facilitate a meet?

What's the point of this?

It's to establish if the sites environment effects what a chap outside of this environment would choose.

To make women feel they're only being messaged because men are desperate?

no - I'm interested in the sites artificial ecosystem and it's balance and the effect on mens and women's perception of each other

Or for men to feel crap because the women they find attractive aren't what society deems as being socially acceptable to fancy?

no - I want to know if that social convention is magnified here due to the conditions.

Realistically we are none of us perfect... that said some verifications are breaching the trade descriptions act... primarily imo... because of the sites environment.

"

"Some verifications are breaching the trades description act" What does that mean? Someone they've found attractive, you think is a minger?

You are coming across as a complete arse at the moment.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"So lowering your standards mean's someone you don't find attractive?!"

Absolutely not.

Attraction isn't black and white is it?

There's a loooooad of grey.

I wanna know how the environment effects the guys greyscale.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ink Panther.Woman
over a year ago

Preston


"*pulls up chair and gets popcorn out* "

This

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I have noticed though that people who start these sort of threads never show much of themselves.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *gnitemybodyWoman
over a year ago

Onestepoutofthedoor


"So lowering your standards mean's someone you don't find attractive?!

Absolutely not.

Attraction isn't black and white is it?

There's a loooooad of grey.

I wanna know how the environment effects the guys greyscale.

"

Well I haven't a clue because you're not saying,what exactly is dropping standard's?!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Well don't contribute, its a valid question. It's rationally proposed.

Your actually reduced to personal insults which says a lot.

I responded to your individual points.

Understand "I'm offended" is not the same as it's "offensive"...

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

OP, what would dropping your standards entail?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"So lowering your standards mean's someone you don't find attractive?!

Absolutely not.

Attraction isn't black and white is it?

There's a loooooad of grey.

I wanna know how the environment effects the guys greyscale.

Well I haven't a clue because you're not saying,what exactly is dropping standard's?!"

Example...

You like black...

Due to:

ratio of m to F

Quantity of mail

Etc etc

Black is rarely if ever achieved.

So what shade of grey is acceptable.

Get it...?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It is just a shag "

Yes you are.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *gnitemybodyWoman
over a year ago

Onestepoutofthedoor


"So lowering your standards mean's someone you don't find attractive?!

Absolutely not.

Attraction isn't black and white is it?

There's a loooooad of grey.

I wanna know how the environment effects the guys greyscale.

Well I haven't a clue because you're not saying,what exactly is dropping standard's?!

Example...

You like black...

Due to:

ratio of m to F

Quantity of mail

Etc etc

Black is rarely if ever achieved.

So what shade of grey is acceptable.

Get it...?"

That's not a drop in standard's though that's a change in preference. If I went to McDonald's and asked for a banana milkshake and they didn't have that flavour I'd chose vanilla instead. It's not dropping my standard's.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *gnitemybodyWoman
over a year ago

Onestepoutofthedoor

Oh I give up...

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *gnitemybodyWoman
over a year ago

Onestepoutofthedoor


"OP, what would dropping your standards entail? "

Having sex with someone grey rather than black

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *orum TrollWoman
over a year ago

•+• Access Denied •+•

i've lowered mine plenty of times, don't see why it's only men who do it.

so what if there's loads of men, not like any of them are quality.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *oxy_minxWoman
over a year ago

Scotland - Aberdeen


"Is anyone going to admit to "lowering their standards"?

Posts like this make me feel like not meeting any more

"

Shag already has

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Is anyone going to admit to "lowering their standards"?

Posts like this make me feel like not meeting any more

Shag already has "

But Shag is an open book, bless him

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Nope. I still have preferences that I will not deviate from just to get a random shag.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"So lowering your standards mean's someone you don't find attractive?!

Absolutely not.

Attraction isn't black and white is it?

There's a loooooad of grey.

I wanna know how the environment effects the guys greyscale.

Well I haven't a clue because you're not saying,what exactly is dropping standard's?!

Example...

You like black...

Due to:

ratio of m to F

Quantity of mail

Etc etc

Black is rarely if ever achieved.

So what shade of grey is acceptable.

Get it...?

That's not a drop in standard's though that's a change in preference. If I went to McDonald's and asked for a banana milkshake and they didn't have that flavour I'd chose vanilla instead. It's not dropping my standard's."

Yes it is go to another fast food outlet to get what you want. Or make do with something you didn't want... therefore lowering your standards.

Your getting the Olympic gold for missing the point

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *lem-H-FandangoMan
over a year ago

salisbury

"Going ugly early" is nothing new. And not restricted to swinging.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

No even the munters think they have the golden ticket hahah

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"No even the munters think they have the golden ticket hahah"

Some of us do

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


""Going ugly early" is nothing new. And not restricted to swinging. "

I'm not saying it is... am saying the environment exacerbates, accelerates and contorts what would be a regular choice.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *lem-H-FandangoMan
over a year ago

salisbury


""Going ugly early" is nothing new. And not restricted to swinging.

I'm not saying it is... am saying the environment exacerbates, accelerates and contorts what would be a regular choice.

"

I don't think that fact has ever been contested here. The winner is the "munter" who's got to fuck a desperate Adonis....

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


""Going ugly early" is nothing new. And not restricted to swinging.

I'm not saying it is... am saying the environment exacerbates, accelerates and contorts what would be a regular choice.

I don't think that fact has ever been contested here. The winner is the "munter" who's got to fuck a desperate Adonis...."

Winner winner chicken dinner

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Hoping some ladies are willing to drop their standards or I fear I'll be twiddling nothing but my thumbs

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *gnitemybodyWoman
over a year ago

Onestepoutofthedoor


"So lowering your standards mean's someone you don't find attractive?!

Absolutely not.

Attraction isn't black and white is it?

There's a loooooad of grey.

I wanna know how the environment effects the guys greyscale.

Well I haven't a clue because you're not saying,what exactly is dropping standard's?!

Example...

You like black...

Due to:

ratio of m to F

Quantity of mail

Etc etc

Black is rarely if ever achieved.

So what shade of grey is acceptable.

Get it...?

That's not a drop in standard's though that's a change in preference. If I went to McDonald's and asked for a banana milkshake and they didn't have that flavour I'd chose vanilla instead. It's not dropping my standard's.

Yes it is go to another fast food outlet to get what you want. Or make do with something you didn't want... therefore lowering your standards.

Your getting the Olympic gold for missing the point "

...because you're not explaining yourself very well! Just spit it out exactly what you mean

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *gnitemybodyWoman
over a year ago

Onestepoutofthedoor


"OP, what would dropping your standards entail? "

I don't think this question was answered either!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I did it once but ended up in a bathtub full of ice and one of my kindney was missing !

Let me tell you that I will never again lower my stantards and trust a woman who drives a kia ceed, listen to Celine Dion while cooking and have two gold front teeth!

Having say that she had lovely kneecaps and beautiful elbows.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *gnitemybodyWoman
over a year ago

Onestepoutofthedoor


"I did it once but ended up in a bathtub full of ice and one of my kindney was missing !

Let me tell you that I will never again lower my stantards and trust a woman who drives a kia ceed, listen to Celine Dion while cooking and have two gold front teeth!

Having say that she had lovely kneecaps and beautiful elbows.

"

I've missed you!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I did it once but ended up in a bathtub full of ice and one of my kindney was missing !

Let me tell you that I will never again lower my stantards and trust a woman who drives a kia ceed, listen to Celine Dion while cooking and have two gold front teeth!

Having say that she had lovely kneecaps and beautiful elbows.

I've missed you!"

And I miss my kidney !

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *gnitemybodyWoman
over a year ago

Onestepoutofthedoor


"I did it once but ended up in a bathtub full of ice and one of my kindney was missing !

Let me tell you that I will never again lower my stantards and trust a woman who drives a kia ceed, listen to Celine Dion while cooking and have two gold front teeth!

Having say that she had lovely kneecaps and beautiful elbows.

I've missed you!

And I miss my kidney ! "

I'll get you another one,not mine though

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I did it once but ended up in a bathtub full of ice and one of my kindney was missing !

Let me tell you that I will never again lower my stantards and trust a woman who drives a kia ceed, listen to Celine Dion while cooking and have two gold front teeth!

Having say that she had lovely kneecaps and beautiful elbows.

I've missed you!

And I miss my kidney !

I'll get you another one,not mine though "

You better ! While we are at it, I also need a new car and two light bulbs

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


""Going ugly early" is nothing new. And not restricted to swinging.

I'm not saying it is... am saying the environment exacerbates, accelerates and contorts what would be a regular choice.

I don't think that fact has ever been contested here. The winner is the "munter" who's got to fuck a desperate Adonis...."

I am eternally grateful to those desperate men, as a munter I'm doing splendidly

#winning#smugaftersexface

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I did it once but ended up in a bathtub full of ice and one of my kindney was missing !

Let me tell you that I will never again lower my stantards and trust a woman who drives a kia ceed, listen to Celine Dion while cooking and have two gold front teeth!

Having say that she had lovely kneecaps and beautiful elbows.

I've missed you!

And I miss my kidney !

I'll get you another one,not mine though

You better ! While we are at it, I also need a new car and two light bulbs "

I'm still considering whether to lower my standards for you Beardy.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I did it once but ended up in a bathtub full of ice and one of my kindney was missing !

Let me tell you that I will never again lower my stantards and trust a woman who drives a kia ceed, listen to Celine Dion while cooking and have two gold front teeth!

Having say that she had lovely kneecaps and beautiful elbows.

I've missed you!

And I miss my kidney !

I'll get you another one,not mine though

You better ! While we are at it, I also need a new car and two light bulbs

I'm still considering whether to lower my standards for you Beardy. "

Please do, I desperately need to get laid and empty my testicles inside a womb

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *gnitemybodyWoman
over a year ago

Onestepoutofthedoor


"I did it once but ended up in a bathtub full of ice and one of my kindney was missing !

Let me tell you that I will never again lower my stantards and trust a woman who drives a kia ceed, listen to Celine Dion while cooking and have two gold front teeth!

Having say that she had lovely kneecaps and beautiful elbows.

I've missed you!

And I miss my kidney !

I'll get you another one,not mine though

You better ! While we are at it, I also need a new car and two light bulbs "

Why are men never happy!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

No. I'm pretty happy sticking to what makes me happy. After all its after a meet that's just as important?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I did it once but ended up in a bathtub full of ice and one of my kindney was missing !

Let me tell you that I will never again lower my stantards and trust a woman who drives a kia ceed, listen to Celine Dion while cooking and have two gold front teeth!

Having say that she had lovely kneecaps and beautiful elbows.

I've missed you!

And I miss my kidney !

I'll get you another one,not mine though

You better ! While we are at it, I also need a new car and two light bulbs

Why are men never happy! "

Im only happy when it rains

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"So the M to F ratio has been discussed.

The quantity of mail women get discussed.

So assuming ladies are saturated with offers and opportunities...

I ask this of the gentlemen...

Gents, do you find you lower what you consider to be your standards to facilitate a meet?"

No. Anything good is worth the wait. Fortunately, being bi means you never have to wait too long.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham

Why is the question only posed to the men of the site?

Just because there are lots of guys to choose from doesn't mean the ones women like are readily available. Perhaps some women just fancy a fuck and will fuck anything when the urge is strong.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Like anyone is going to admit to it."
That is right, noone will do it lol.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Nah I'm fussy, it's paid off as I've done sexy stuff with some lovely women over the years

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It is just a shag

Yes you are."

lol good one.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *gnitemybodyWoman
over a year ago

Onestepoutofthedoor


"Why is the question only posed to the men of the site?

Just because there are lots of guys to choose from doesn't mean the ones women like are readily available. Perhaps some women just fancy a fuck and will fuck anything when the urge is strong. "

Ok maybe you'll answer my question. When you say 'anything' what exactly is anything? Op said it's nothing to do with attraction so what is lowering of standard's for you. Are you 'anything,am I,who is on this thread?!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *eavenscentitCouple
over a year ago

barnstaple

I din't think men are fussy in real life either.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham


"Why is the question only posed to the men of the site?

Just because there are lots of guys to choose from doesn't mean the ones women like are readily available. Perhaps some women just fancy a fuck and will fuck anything when the urge is strong.

Ok maybe you'll answer my question. When you say 'anything' what exactly is anything? Op said it's nothing to do with attraction so what is lowering of standard's for you. Are you 'anything,am I,who is on this thread?! "

For me, whenever I see someone say they lower their standards I do think they mean they will fuck someone they don't find attractive just to get their rocks off.

My question was more to illustrate the rather sexist nature of the OP.

I have to say, reading through the thread and some of the OP's replies I think the subject is confused and ill thought out.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *gnitemybodyWoman
over a year ago

Onestepoutofthedoor


"Why is the question only posed to the men of the site?

Just because there are lots of guys to choose from doesn't mean the ones women like are readily available. Perhaps some women just fancy a fuck and will fuck anything when the urge is strong.

Ok maybe you'll answer my question. When you say 'anything' what exactly is anything? Op said it's nothing to do with attraction so what is lowering of standard's for you. Are you 'anything,am I,who is on this thread?!

For me, whenever I see someone say they lower their standards I do think they mean they will fuck someone they don't find attractive just to get their rocks off.

My question was more to illustrate the rather sexist nature of the OP.

I have to say, reading through the thread and some of the OP's replies I think the subject is confused and ill thought out. "

Thankyou Evie,I agree!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

So the question was:

'Gents, do you find you lower what you consider to be your standards to facilitate a meet?'

My god the offence that such a question seems to have caused! Sometimes I wonder if I'm the only one who doesn't take personal offence to these type of threads!

Mrs

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *gnitemybodyWoman
over a year ago

Onestepoutofthedoor


"So the question was:

'Gents, do you find you lower what you consider to be your standards to facilitate a meet?'

My god the offence that such a question seems to have caused! Sometimes I wonder if I'm the only one who doesn't take personal offence to these type of threads!

Mrs "

I 'personally' didn't take offence I just want to know what he mean's and he's not saying apart from a load of waffle.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Meh. ..why would I give a fuck if a man has to lower his standards to meet me. I'm not the loser in that situation

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"So the question was:

'Gents, do you find you lower what you consider to be your standards to facilitate a meet?'

My god the offence that such a question seems to have caused! Sometimes I wonder if I'm the only one who doesn't take personal offence to these type of threads!

Mrs

I 'personally' didn't take offence I just want to know what he mean's and he's not saying apart from a load of waffle. "

I thought it was a straightforward question

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *gnitemybodyWoman
over a year ago

Onestepoutofthedoor


"So the question was:

'Gents, do you find you lower what you consider to be your standards to facilitate a meet?'

My god the offence that such a question seems to have caused! Sometimes I wonder if I'm the only one who doesn't take personal offence to these type of threads!

Mrs

I 'personally' didn't take offence I just want to know what he mean's and he's not saying apart from a load of waffle.

I thought it was a straightforward question"

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

So I think guys will discreetly meet women on here that they would never date or introduce to their mates.

They also cross the gender line in a kinda gay for the stay prison desperate kinda way.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Guys who can be fussy and still get meets will be and those who can't won't.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"My question was more to illustrate the rather sexist nature of the OP.

I have to say, reading through the thread and some of the OP's replies I think the subject is confused and ill thought out. "

So despite listing the formula that leads to a question and replying to people who have been aggressive and personally offensive, in a calm and rational manor... It's sexist and I'll thought out.

So currently there are 43 post live with ladies complaining for where quantity of mail.

Separately there are complainants citing their hatred of copy paste and fancy a fuck now mail.

One lady and her friend have over 1100 messages.

So my question asks of those lengthy threads and contributors are those 1100 men or are those 43 posts derived from what men are doing a cause of the sites ecosystem or environment. I'd argue they are.

My question poses then... at a ration of 18:1 how is that possible without certain esteemed gentlemen lowering a standard they would have in their normal social circles just to chuck their muck.

I would argue they (A majority) do.

I think that's a reasonable thought pattern.

I don't think it's I'll thought out it's just evident you don't like the line of the question so you attack using egregious terms - which I have not returned.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ink Panther.Woman
over a year ago

Preston


"So I think guys will discreetly meet women on here that they would never date or introduce to their mates.

They also cross the gender line in a kinda gay for the stay prison desperate kinda way. "

You have a wonderful way with words

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *uckOfTheBayMan
over a year ago

Mold


"So the M to F ratio has been discussed.

The quantity of mail women get discussed.

So assuming ladies are saturated with offers and opportunities...

I ask this of the gentlemen...

Gents, do you find you lower what you consider to be your standards to facilitate a meet?"

How desperate do you have to be to have sex ?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Why is the question only posed to the men of the site?

Just because there are lots of guys to choose from doesn't mean the ones women like are readily available. Perhaps some women just fancy a fuck and will fuck anything when the urge is strong.

Ok maybe you'll answer my question. When you say 'anything' what exactly is anything? Op said it's nothing to do with attraction so what is lowering of standard's for you. Are you 'anything,am I,who is on this thread?!

For me, whenever I see someone say they lower their standards I do think they mean they will fuck someone they don't find attractive just to get their rocks off.

My question was more to illustrate the rather sexist nature of the OP.

I have to say, reading through the thread and some of the OP's replies I think the subject is confused and ill thought out.

Thankyou Evie,I agree!"

Are you 8...?

Your playground milkshake analogy was infantile so your reduced to this.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *gnitemybodyWoman
over a year ago

Onestepoutofthedoor


"OP, what would dropping your standards entail?

I don't think this question was answered either! "

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Absolutely not, I don't mean to sound arrogant but I don't struggle to meet women in the real world so why should I.

If we're not on the same level regarding opinion towards each other and expectations then I'd rather not anyway.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *gnitemybodyWoman
over a year ago

Onestepoutofthedoor


"OP, what would dropping your standards entail?

I don't think this question was answered either!

"

Nearly 9...

Why do you keep ignoring this question?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"So I think guys will discreetly meet women on here that they would never date or introduce to their mates.

They also cross the gender line in a kinda gay for the stay prison desperate kinda way.

You have a wonderful way with words "

Well it's true I get all kinda straight guys asking for oral or wanting to fuck me, not your 'fab straight curious wanna suck on cock' guys

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"So I think guys will discreetly meet women on here that they would never date or introduce to their mates.

They also cross the gender line in a kinda gay for the stay prison desperate kinda way. "

100% agree and the initial part I have suggested is a lowering of standards...

However I fear I will be crucified prior to completing my point by the willfully ignorant spouting vitriolical terms.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"So I think guys will discreetly meet women on here that they would never date or introduce to their mates.

They also cross the gender line in a kinda gay for the stay prison desperate kinda way.

You have a wonderful way with words

Well it's true I get all kinda straight guys asking for oral or wanting to fuck me, not your 'fab straight curious wanna suck on cock' guys "

My local updates would seem to agree with you here

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham


"Why is the question only posed to the men of the site?

Just because there are lots of guys to choose from doesn't mean the ones women like are readily available. Perhaps some women just fancy a fuck and will fuck anything when the urge is strong.

Ok maybe you'll answer my question. When you say 'anything' what exactly is anything? Op said it's nothing to do with attraction so what is lowering of standard's for you. Are you 'anything,am I,who is on this thread?!

For me, whenever I see someone say they lower their standards I do think they mean they will fuck someone they don't find attractive just to get their rocks off.

My question was more to illustrate the rather sexist nature of the OP.

I have to say, reading through the thread and some of the OP's replies I think the subject is confused and ill thought out.

Thankyou Evie,I agree!

Are you 8...?

Your playground milkshake analogy was infantile so your reduced to this."

How was it any different to your black/grey one?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *gnitemybodyWoman
over a year ago

Onestepoutofthedoor


"So I think guys will discreetly meet women on here that they would never date or introduce to their mates.

They also cross the gender line in a kinda gay for the stay prison desperate kinda way.

100% agree and the initial part I have suggested is a lowering of standards...

However I fear I will be crucified prior to completing my point by the willfully ignorant spouting vitriolical terms.

"

Well for heaven's sake spit your point out I'm losing the will to live

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

I ask this of the gentlemen...

Gents, do you find you lower what you consider to be your standards to facilitate a meet?"

With that theory your assuming I have standards. Once I removed a door handle and humped the hole that was there.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham


"So I think guys will discreetly meet women on here that they would never date or introduce to their mates.

They also cross the gender line in a kinda gay for the stay prison desperate kinda way.

100% agree and the initial part I have suggested is a lowering of standards...

However I fear I will be crucified prior to completing my point by the willfully ignorant spouting vitriolical terms.

"

But that's what people were saying you were implying and you said it wasn't. It was nothing to do with attraction, just Fucking a different type of person.

You are so desperately trying to be some sort of pseudo intellectual you have managed to confuse yourself lol

All you needed to say is 'lads, is any hole a goal on here for you?'

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

I ask this of the gentlemen...

Gents, do you find you lower what you consider to be your standards to facilitate a meet?

With that theory your assuming I have standards. Once I removed a door handle and humped the hole that was there. "

Chortle.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"So I think guys will discreetly meet women on here that they would never date or introduce to their mates.

They also cross the gender line in a kinda gay for the stay prison desperate kinda way.

You have a wonderful way with words

Well it's true I get all kinda straight guys asking for oral or wanting to fuck me, not your 'fab straight curious wanna suck on cock' guys

My local updates would seem to agree with you here "

Wonder how many get all self loathing after

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *lem-H-FandangoMan
over a year ago

salisbury

I don't see the point in going ugly early on fab. If your desperate have a wank. If you're at a club and its late and the creature from the black lagoon offers you a hand job, go with it!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Why is the question only posed to the men of the site?

Just because there are lots of guys to choose from doesn't mean the ones women like are readily available. Perhaps some women just fancy a fuck and will fuck anything when the urge is strong. "

I think it's quite a fair question to be aimed specifically at men in this instance.

I'm struggling with how to word this without sounding like an arse but there are a fair proportion (IMO) of people on here of both sexes who based on the physicality defined by the photos that they choose to share probably don't have a lot of luck in real life.

The difference between that and gender on here is that a man will not get anywhere and either become bitter or leave whilst, in lots of cases (as can be seen with a quick search) the woman will still receive lots of attention and her demands will increase.. words like 'picky' and 'apply' will appear along with higher expectations upon appearance for their prospective partners.

I'm not going to give any details.. but I know of a couple of women who have stepped back from this lifestyle and towards normal dating and can't for the life of them understand? why their messages to men aren't received in the same way.

I think that says that men probably do drop their standards.. or join without any in the first place really, but i still think it's a fair question to be aimed just at men.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *eavenscentitCouple
over a year ago

barnstaple

Men complain about not getting meets, then insult women on here that do meet - same old double standard around sex.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham


"I don't see the point in going ugly early on fab. If your desperate have a wank. If you're at a club and its late and the creature from the black lagoon offers you a hand job, go with it! "

Ahhhh my favourite hunting hour!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"OP, what would dropping your standards entail?

Nearly 9...

Why do you keep ignoring this question?"

It's been answered above. Your not getting it.

Dropping standards - simplistic terms.

You aim for someone you consider a 10. After 500 mesaages you get one you consider a 3. What constitutes a 10 or 3 is subjective to the individual.

Irrespective, this is still a drop in standards.

That's a dropping of standards. I do not see what's so hard to see a out that.

Also what I refer to above is heightened or exacerbated by the sites environment.

So again... to me it's a totally reasonable question and slightly better than the bullshit - post if you like breathing options in the forum.

Question answered my little nettle x

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *layfullsamMan
over a year ago

Solihull

I read an article that said horny men consider almost any female a potential partner while horny women showed a far greater interest towards the most attractive mates

No idea if it's bulls..t but hey it might ad to the discussion

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *gnitemybodyWoman
over a year ago

Onestepoutofthedoor


"So I think guys will discreetly meet women on here that they would never date or introduce to their mates.

They also cross the gender line in a kinda gay for the stay prison desperate kinda way.

100% agree and the initial part I have suggested is a lowering of standards...

However I fear I will be crucified prior to completing my point by the willfully ignorant spouting vitriolical terms.

But that's what people were saying you were implying and you said it wasn't. It was nothing to do with attraction, just Fucking a different type of person.

You are so desperately trying to be some sort of pseudo intellectual you have managed to confuse yourself lol

All you needed to say is 'lads, is any hole a goal on here for you?' "

Yeah I give up now he's chosing not to answer what it means to him,so I can only presume he doesn't know or doesn't want to admit it's down to attraction.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham


"Why is the question only posed to the men of the site?

Just because there are lots of guys to choose from doesn't mean the ones women like are readily available. Perhaps some women just fancy a fuck and will fuck anything when the urge is strong.

I think it's quite a fair question to be aimed specifically at men in this instance.

I'm struggling with how to word this without sounding like an arse but there are a fair proportion (IMO) of people on here of both sexes who based on the physicality defined by the photos that they choose to share probably don't have a lot of luck in real life.

The difference between that and gender on here is that a man will not get anywhere and either become bitter or leave whilst, in lots of cases (as can be seen with a quick search) the woman will still receive lots of attention and her demands will increase.. words like 'picky' and 'apply' will appear along with higher expectations upon appearance for their prospective partners.

I'm not going to give any details.. but I know of a couple of women who have stepped back from this lifestyle and towards normal dating and can't for the life of them understand? why their messages to men aren't received in the same way.

I think that says that men probably do drop their standards.. or join without any in the first place really, but i still think it's a fair question to be aimed just at men. "

Believe you me there are a fair few men who have overly inflated opinions of their own attractiveness on here..... It's not just the women lol

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I don't see the point in going ugly early on fab. If your desperate have a wank. If you're at a club and its late and the creature from the black lagoon offers you a hand job, go with it! "

How about the creature from the black leather lagoon?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Men complain about not getting meets, then insult women on here that do meet - same old double standard around sex.

"

'Some' men. . But the negativity of some people's views and voices are the ones that stand out and take centre stage in life. Sad but true.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *gnitemybodyWoman
over a year ago

Onestepoutofthedoor


"So I think guys will discreetly meet women on here that they would never date or introduce to their mates.

They also cross the gender line in a kinda gay for the stay prison desperate kinda way.

100% agree and the initial part I have suggested is a lowering of standards...

However I fear I will be crucified prior to completing my point by the willfully ignorant spouting vitriolical terms.

But that's what people were saying you were implying and you said it wasn't. It was nothing to do with attraction, just Fucking a different type of person.

You are so desperately trying to be some sort of pseudo intellectual you have managed to confuse yourself lol

All you needed to say is 'lads, is any hole a goal on here for you?'

Yeah I give up now he's chosing not to answer what it means to him,so I can only presume he doesn't know or doesn't want to admit it's down to attraction."

Ignore that...^

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

nah, i just have not got any standards, lol.

I am the sort that "goes ugly early" at a nightclub just so i pull.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I've never waivered on my desires (or standards if you prefer); and before you say I can't answer because I'm lacking a Y chromosome, I'm meeting women so fishing in a similar pool to the OP.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

Dropping standards - simplistic terms.

You aim for someone you consider a 10. After 500 mesaages you get one you consider a 3. What constitutes a 10 or 3 is subjective to the individual.

Irrespective, this is still a drop in standards.

That's a dropping of standards.

x"

That's interesting, if a guy messages me first there's more chance he finds me attractive than me messaging the guy and him thinking hmm well I'm not getting anywhere so you'll do!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"So I think guys will discreetly meet women on here that they would never date or introduce to their mates.

They also cross the gender line in a kinda gay for the stay prison desperate kinda way.

100% agree and the initial part I have suggested is a lowering of standards...

However I fear I will be crucified prior to completing my point by the willfully ignorant spouting vitriolical terms.

But that's what people were saying you were implying and you said it wasn't. It was nothing to do with attraction, just Fucking a different type of person.

You are so desperately trying to be some sort of pseudo intellectual you have managed to confuse yourself lol

All you needed to say is 'lads, is any hole a goal on here for you?' "

No offence am born and bread on a council estate in Liverpool. Intellectual am not.

Am confused about nothing I merely posed a question that you saw fit to attack and disect to nuance your perspective.

I clearly set the parameters around why the question was being posed. It's not a simple as any holes a goal that polarises it... like I said there's a lot of grey.

Please don't attack me again it's not fair I've only asked a question.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"

Dropping standards - simplistic terms.

You aim for someone you consider a 10. After 500 mesaages you get one you consider a 3. What constitutes a 10 or 3 is subjective to the individual.

Irrespective, this is still a drop in standards.

That's a dropping of standards.

x

That's interesting, if a guy messages me first there's more chance he finds me attractive than me messaging the guy and him thinking hmm well I'm not getting anywhere so you'll do! "

Cool response thank you

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Why is the question only posed to the men of the site?

Just because there are lots of guys to choose from doesn't mean the ones women like are readily available. Perhaps some women just fancy a fuck and will fuck anything when the urge is strong.

I think it's quite a fair question to be aimed specifically at men in this instance.

I'm struggling with how to word this without sounding like an arse but there are a fair proportion (IMO) of people on here of both sexes who based on the physicality defined by the photos that they choose to share probably don't have a lot of luck in real life.

The difference between that and gender on here is that a man will not get anywhere and either become bitter or leave whilst, in lots of cases (as can be seen with a quick search) the woman will still receive lots of attention and her demands will increase.. words like 'picky' and 'apply' will appear along with higher expectations upon appearance for their prospective partners.

I'm not going to give any details.. but I know of a couple of women who have stepped back from this lifestyle and towards normal dating and can't for the life of them understand? why their messages to men aren't received in the same way.

I think that says that men probably do drop their standards.. or join without any in the first place really, but i still think it's a fair question to be aimed just at men.

Believe you me there are a fair few men who have overly inflated opinions of their own attractiveness on here..... It's not just the women lol "

I'm sure you're right to be fair.. i guess ratios may make it seem more skewed too.. that and the fact i don't look at blokes lol

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *gnitemybodyWoman
over a year ago

Onestepoutofthedoor


"OP, what would dropping your standards entail?

Nearly 9...

Why do you keep ignoring this question?

It's been answered above. Your not getting it.

Dropping standards - simplistic terms.

You aim for someone you consider a 10. After 500 mesaages you get one you consider a 3. What constitutes a 10 or 3 is subjective to the individual.

Irrespective, this is still a drop in standards.

That's a dropping of standards. I do not see what's so hard to see a out that.

Also what I refer to above is heightened or exacerbated by the sites environment.

So again... to me it's a totally reasonable question and slightly better than the bullshit - post if you like breathing options in the forum.

Question answered my little nettle x"

Not really no. For YOU what does it mean? Cut the waffle just spit it out.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I don't lower my standards at all. As I can go out and find a good looking women to have fun with off this site. Why I am here is to find a like minded female to have adventures, open fun and someone to attend clubs with.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"OP, what would dropping your standards entail?

Nearly 9...

Why do you keep ignoring this question?

It's been answered above. Your not getting it.

Dropping standards - simplistic terms.

You aim for someone you consider a 10. After 500 mesaages you get one you consider a 3. What constitutes a 10 or 3 is subjective to the individual.

Irrespective, this is still a drop in standards.

That's a dropping of standards. I do not see what's so hard to see a out that.

Also what I refer to above is heightened or exacerbated by the sites environment.

So again... to me it's a totally reasonable question and slightly better than the bullshit - post if you like breathing options in the forum.

Question answered my little nettle x

Not really no. For YOU what does it mean? Cut the waffle just spit it out."

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *gnitemybodyWoman
over a year ago

Onestepoutofthedoor


"So I think guys will discreetly meet women on here that they would never date or introduce to their mates.

They also cross the gender line in a kinda gay for the stay prison desperate kinda way.

100% agree and the initial part I have suggested is a lowering of standards...

However I fear I will be crucified prior to completing my point by the willfully ignorant spouting vitriolical terms.

But that's what people were saying you were implying and you said it wasn't. It was nothing to do with attraction, just Fucking a different type of person.

You are so desperately trying to be some sort of pseudo intellectual you have managed to confuse yourself lol

All you needed to say is 'lads, is any hole a goal on here for you?'

No offence am born and bread on a council estate in Liverpool. Intellectual am not.

Am confused about nothing I merely posed a question that you saw fit to attack and disect to nuance your perspective.

I clearly set the parameters around why the question was being posed. It's not a simple as any holes a goal that polarises it... like I said there's a lot of grey.

Please don't attack me again it's not fair I've only asked a question.

"

Nobody is attacking you! I just want to understand what you mean.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"So I think guys will discreetly meet women on here that they would never date or introduce to their mates.

They also cross the gender line in a kinda gay for the stay prison desperate kinda way.

100% agree and the initial part I have suggested is a lowering of standards...

However I fear I will be crucified prior to completing my point by the willfully ignorant spouting vitriolical terms.

But that's what people were saying you were implying and you said it wasn't. It was nothing to do with attraction, just Fucking a different type of person.

You are so desperately trying to be some sort of pseudo intellectual you have managed to confuse yourself lol

All you needed to say is 'lads, is any hole a goal on here for you?'

No offence am born and bread on a council estate in Liverpool. Intellectual am not.

Am confused about nothing I merely posed a question that you saw fit to attack and disect to nuance your perspective.

I clearly set the parameters around why the question was being posed. It's not a simple as any holes a goal that polarises it... like I said there's a lot of grey.

Please don't attack me again it's not fair I've only asked a question.

"

If it's any help OP, I understood your question. I also thought it was an interesting question and, as someone who finds sexual psychology fascinating, a question I've often pondered myself.

Mrs

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"So I think guys will discreetly meet women on here that they would never date or introduce to their mates.

They also cross the gender line in a kinda gay for the stay prison desperate kinda way.

100% agree and the initial part I have suggested is a lowering of standards...

However I fear I will be crucified prior to completing my point by the willfully ignorant spouting vitriolical terms.

But that's what people were saying you were implying and you said it wasn't. It was nothing to do with attraction, just Fucking a different type of person.

You are so desperately trying to be some sort of pseudo intellectual you have managed to confuse yourself lol

All you needed to say is 'lads, is any hole a goal on here for you?'

No offence am born and bread on a council estate in Liverpool. Intellectual am not.

Am confused about nothing I merely posed a question that you saw fit to attack and disect to nuance your perspective.

I clearly set the parameters around why the question was being posed. It's not a simple as any holes a goal that polarises it... like I said there's a lot of grey.

Please don't attack me again it's not fair I've only asked a question.

"

That's not the thick skinned response I would expect off working class scouse

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

That's in the back pocket

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *kin BohnerMan
over a year ago

derby


"So the M to F ratio has been discussed.

The quantity of mail women get discussed.

So assuming ladies are saturated with offers and opportunities...

I ask this of the gentlemen...

Gents, do you find you lower what you consider to be your standards to facilitate a meet?

What's the point of this?

To make women feel they're only being messaged because men are desperate?

Or for men to feel crap because the women they find attractive aren't what society deems as being socially acceptable to fancy?

Yep I agree. I hate it when people start talking about lowering of standards,I don't even know what it really mean's as far as men are concerned. If someone has sex with me does it mean men are lowering their standards?! Don't answer that..."

I take it to mean we all find different types, build, ages etc attractive.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"So I think guys will discreetly meet women on here that they would never date or introduce to their mates.

They also cross the gender line in a kinda gay for the stay prison desperate kinda way.

100% agree and the initial part I have suggested is a lowering of standards...

However I fear I will be crucified prior to completing my point by the willfully ignorant spouting vitriolical terms.

But that's what people were saying you were implying and you said it wasn't. It was nothing to do with attraction, just Fucking a different type of person.

You are so desperately trying to be some sort of pseudo intellectual you have managed to confuse yourself lol

All you needed to say is 'lads, is any hole a goal on here for you?'

No offence am born and bread on a council estate in Liverpool. Intellectual am not.

Am confused about nothing I merely posed a question that you saw fit to attack and disect to nuance your perspective.

I clearly set the parameters around why the question was being posed. It's not a simple as any holes a goal that polarises it... like I said there's a lot of grey.

Please don't attack me again it's not fair I've only asked a question.

If it's any help OP, I understood your question. I also thought it was an interesting question and, as someone who finds sexual psychology fascinating, a question I've often pondered myself.

Mrs"

Then I sincerely thank you for that and for making it clear in the forum as am realising how oppressive it can be.

Truly appreciated.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *gnitemybodyWoman
over a year ago

Onestepoutofthedoor

Oh dear...

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham


"So I think guys will discreetly meet women on here that they would never date or introduce to their mates.

They also cross the gender line in a kinda gay for the stay prison desperate kinda way.

100% agree and the initial part I have suggested is a lowering of standards...

However I fear I will be crucified prior to completing my point by the willfully ignorant spouting vitriolical terms.

But that's what people were saying you were implying and you said it wasn't. It was nothing to do with attraction, just Fucking a different type of person.

You are so desperately trying to be some sort of pseudo intellectual you have managed to confuse yourself lol

All you needed to say is 'lads, is any hole a goal on here for you?'

No offence am born and bread on a council estate in Liverpool. Intellectual am not.

Am confused about nothing I merely posed a question that you saw fit to attack and disect to nuance your perspective.

I clearly set the parameters around why the question was being posed. It's not a simple as any holes a goal that polarises it... like I said there's a lot of grey.

Please don't attack me again it's not fair I've only asked a question.

"

But surely the whole point of a discussion is to discect the question posed? Getting other people's perspective on the motive and intention behind the question.

Your further posts on the subject have contradicted what you say is your stance, many times. I and other posters have simply tried to clarify your point.

I think the most telling post that shows your motive is the one where you state that some verifications could be done under the trade descriptions act. You don't understand how some men can find women sexy when you don't think they are.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *esparate danMan
over a year ago

glasgow


"So I think guys will discreetly meet women on here that they would never date or introduce to their mates.

They also cross the gender line in a kinda gay for the stay prison desperate kinda way.

100% agree and the initial part I have suggested is a lowering of standards...

However I fear I will be crucified prior to completing my point by the willfully ignorant spouting vitriolical terms.

But that's what people were saying you were implying and you said it wasn't. It was nothing to do with attraction, just Fucking a different type of person.

You are so desperately trying to be some sort of pseudo intellectual you have managed to confuse yourself lol

All you needed to say is 'lads, is any hole a goal on here for you?'

No offence am born and bread on a council estate in Liverpool. Intellectual am not.

Am confused about nothing I merely posed a question that you saw fit to attack and disect to nuance your perspective.

I clearly set the parameters around why the question was being posed. It's not a simple as any holes a goal that polarises it... like I said there's a lot of grey.

Please don't attack me again it's not fair I've only asked a question.

That's not the thick skinned response I would expect off working class scouse"

Calm down calm down

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ink Panther.Woman
over a year ago

Preston


"So I think guys will discreetly meet women on here that they would never date or introduce to their mates.

They also cross the gender line in a kinda gay for the stay prison desperate kinda way.

You have a wonderful way with words

Well it's true I get all kinda straight guys asking for oral or wanting to fuck me, not your 'fab straight curious wanna suck on cock' guys "

Your talking straight straight guys then

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *lem-H-FandangoMan
over a year ago

salisbury

If your ideal standard is Sharon Stone in Basic instinct, but when you're horny you'll fuck Gwyneth Paltrow in the movie Shallow Hal.. That's dropping your standards. It's not rocket science Toast!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *igeiaWoman
over a year ago

Bristol


"So the M to F ratio has been discussed.

The quantity of mail women get discussed.

So assuming ladies are saturated with offers and opportunities...

I ask this of the gentlemen...

Gents, do you find you lower what you consider to be your standards to facilitate a meet?"

I'm pretty sure some do. And although I may have been the one to benefit from such magnanimity it's also not something I like thinking they may have done when it comes to me. It's always going to be a reactionary question, regardless of which gender the question is posed of (for I am pretty sure some women do too and some couples where one takes one for the team as it were) because at the back of pretty much everyone's minds is probably the thought "but I'm special. No one would be lowering their standards by going for me. Would they?!"

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The Ops question is very straight forward and clear. This phenomenon is not unique to Fab or to men.

ANY environment that has a large majority of men or women will make those in the minority more fussy and those in the majority less.

There are exceptions but it's natural animal behaviour.

Most men will never admit to 'lowering their preferred standards' because it will hugely damage their chances of getting sex and thereby force them to lower their standards even further.

Many women dislike this type of conversation because they don't want to accept they're a compromise choice.

That said, lots of women lower their ideal standard on here even though they're in the minority because they still don't attract the guys they really want.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"The Ops question is very straight forward and clear. This phenomenon is not unique to Fab or to men.

ANY environment that has a large majority of men or women will make those in the minority more fussy and those in the majority less.

There are exceptions but it's natural animal behaviour.

Most men will never admit to 'lowering their preferred standards' because it will hugely damage their chances of getting sex and thereby force them to lower their standards even further.

Many women dislike this type of conversation because they don't want to accept they're a compromise choice.

That said, lots of women lower their ideal standard on here even though they're in the minority because they still don't attract the guys they really want.

"

Very well said

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *gnitemybodyWoman
over a year ago

Onestepoutofthedoor


"If your ideal standard is Sharon Stone in Basic instinct, but when you're horny you'll fuck Gwyneth Paltrow in the movie Shallow Hal.. That's dropping your standards. It's not rocket science Toast!"

but the op said it's nothing to do with attraction.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *lem-H-FandangoMan
over a year ago

salisbury


"So I think guys will discreetly meet women on here that they would never date or introduce to their mates.

They also cross the gender line in a kinda gay for the stay prison desperate kinda way.

100% agree and the initial part I have suggested is a lowering of standards...

However I fear I will be crucified prior to completing my point by the willfully ignorant spouting vitriolical terms.

But that's what people were saying you were implying and you said it wasn't. It was nothing to do with attraction, just Fucking a different type of person.

You are so desperately trying to be some sort of pseudo intellectual you have managed to confuse yourself lol

All you needed to say is 'lads, is any hole a goal on here for you?'

No offence am born and bread on a council estate in Liverpool. Intellectual am not.

Am confused about nothing I merely posed a question that you saw fit to attack and disect to nuance your perspective.

I clearly set the parameters around why the question was being posed. It's not a simple as any holes a goal that polarises it... like I said there's a lot of grey.

Please don't attack me again it's not fair I've only asked a question.

That's not the thick skinned response I would expect off working class scouse"

He's a liar in my opinion. One minute pretends to be poorly educated, but quite happily throws "facilitates" "parameters" and "polarises" about like confetti at a wedding!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *gnitemybodyWoman
over a year ago

Onestepoutofthedoor


"If your ideal standard is Sharon Stone in Basic instinct, but when you're horny you'll fuck Gwyneth Paltrow in the movie Shallow Hal.. That's dropping your standards. It's not rocket science Toast!

but the op said it's nothing to do with attraction."

Ps I've never seen Shallow Hal.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *lem-H-FandangoMan
over a year ago

salisbury


"If your ideal standard is Sharon Stone in Basic instinct, but when you're horny you'll fuck Gwyneth Paltrow in the movie Shallow Hal.. That's dropping your standards. It's not rocket science Toast!

but the op said it's nothing to do with attraction."

Ah, but he's poorly educated...... he know not wot he does.....

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"

You aim for someone you consider a 10. After 500 mesaages you get one you consider a 3. What constitutes a 10 or 3 is subjective to the individual.

Question answered my little nettle x

Not really no. For YOU what does it mean? Cut the waffle just spit it out."

This. Slow your role now my little nettle. I am trying to reply your just not that important you warrant direct replies.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"So the M to F ratio has been discussed.

The quantity of mail women get discussed.

So assuming ladies are saturated with offers and opportunities...

I ask this of the gentlemen...

Gents, do you find you lower what you consider to be your standards to facilitate a meet?

I'm pretty sure some do. And although I may have been the one to benefit from such magnanimity it's also not something I like thinking they may have done when it comes to me. It's always going to be a reactionary question, regardless of which gender the question is posed of (for I am pretty sure some women do too and some couples where one takes one for the team as it were) because at the back of pretty much everyone's minds is probably the thought "but I'm special. No one would be lowering their standards by going for me. Would they?!""

Very good post

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *oiluvfunMan
over a year ago

Penrith


"So the M to F ratio has been discussed.

The quantity of mail women get discussed.

So assuming ladies are saturated with offers and opportunities...

I ask this of the gentlemen...

Gents, do you find you lower what you consider to be your standards to facilitate a meet?

I would rather have a wank than sex with someone I didn't really fancy.

Plus I'm lucky I have met a few nice ladies who are willing to see me for repeat meets so have not had the need to."

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I'd drop my standards and anything else for that matter for a shag.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Dropping standards is the equivalent to shagging a ten to two bird on a night out. You haven't pulled all night so just go home with anyone before the club finishes.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *lem-H-FandangoMan
over a year ago

salisbury


"If your ideal standard is Sharon Stone in Basic instinct, but when you're horny you'll fuck Gwyneth Paltrow in the movie Shallow Hal.. That's dropping your standards. It's not rocket science Toast!

but the op said it's nothing to do with attraction.

Ps I've never seen Shallow Hal."

Ah, Gwyneth Paltrow is fucking huge! Breaks chairs, the lot. Jack Black has been hypnotized into seeing people's inner beauty. So he sees her as the gorgeous slim beauty that the actress is. Not the enormous fat lump that her character's reality is.

The film's message is, inside every ugly fat fucker there's a western ideal image waiting to get out. I think.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"The Ops question is very straight forward and clear. This phenomenon is not unique to Fab or to men.

ANY environment that has a large majority of men or women will make those in the minority more fussy and those in the majority less.

There are exceptions but it's natural animal behaviour.

Most men will never admit to 'lowering their preferred standards' because it will hugely damage their chances of getting sex and thereby force them to lower their standards even further.

Many women dislike this type of conversation because they don't want to accept they're a compromise choice.

That said, lots of women lower their ideal standard on here even though they're in the minority because they still don't attract the guys they really want.

"

Nice one for having the bottle mate. Appreciated

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *edonisticbikerUKMan
over a year ago

Coleshill and Rushden

No never I think that's why I'v only ever had 1 meet arranged on here as it mainly based on physical attraction where at clubs I find my self getting mentally attracted to people.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *lem-H-FandangoMan
over a year ago

salisbury


"Dropping standards is the equivalent to shagging a ten to two bird on a night out. You haven't pulled all night so just go home with anyone before the club finishes. "

"Go ugly early, don't go home alone".

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

You aim for someone you consider a 10. After 500 mesaages you get one you consider a 3. What constitutes a 10 or 3 is subjective to the individual.

Question answered my little nettle x

Not really no. For YOU what does it mean? Cut the waffle just spit it out.

This. Slow your role now my little nettle. I am trying to reply your just not that important you warrant direct replies.

"

You have a better argument throughout the thread than she does Op. You've explained yourself well....but the 'little nettle' stuff reflects on you poorly.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *inkyLondonpairCouple
over a year ago

London

The reality is that on the whole men are less choosy than women. When we were at cap dagde we did an experiment along the lines of "would you shag" the person walking past. I think my score was about 90% on the women and Katies about 20% on the men.

So its not about lowering standards as such. If a bloke had both woman A and woman B offering to have sex with him he might fancy woman A more and have sex with her. However if only woman B is offering he will happily have sex with her. That's not a lowering of standards. He still fancies woman B just not as much as Woman A.

Obviously though woman B does not want to feel she is second choice to woman A so any bloke with any sense will not tell her that.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"If your ideal standard is Sharon Stone in Basic instinct, but when you're horny you'll fuck Gwyneth Paltrow in the movie Shallow Hal.. That's dropping your standards. It's not rocket science Toast!

but the op said it's nothing to do with attraction."

Where did I say exactly that...?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *lem-H-FandangoMan
over a year ago

salisbury


"No never I think that's why I'v only ever had 1 meet arranged on here as it mainly based on physical attraction where at clubs I find my self getting mentally attracted to people."

Sounds dangerous...

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *gnitemybodyWoman
over a year ago

Onestepoutofthedoor


"

You aim for someone you consider a 10. After 500 mesaages you get one you consider a 3. What constitutes a 10 or 3 is subjective to the individual.

Question answered my little nettle x

Not really no. For YOU what does it mean? Cut the waffle just spit it out.

This. Slow your role now my little nettle. I am trying to reply your just not that important you warrant direct replies.

"

See you just resort to insult's don't you when people ask you to clarify what it means to you and you called me the child!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *gnitemybodyWoman
over a year ago

Onestepoutofthedoor


"So lowering your standards mean's someone you don't find attractive?!

Absolutely not.

Attraction isn't black and white is it?

There's a loooooad of grey.

I wanna know how the environment effects the guys greyscale.

"

Here!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *gnitemybodyWoman
over a year ago

Onestepoutofthedoor


"

You aim for someone you consider a 10. After 500 mesaages you get one you consider a 3. What constitutes a 10 or 3 is subjective to the individual.

Question answered my little nettle x

Not really no. For YOU what does it mean? Cut the waffle just spit it out.

This. Slow your role now my little nettle. I am trying to reply your just not that important you warrant direct replies.

You have a better argument throughout the thread than she does Op. You've explained yourself well....but the 'little nettle' stuff reflects on you poorly.

"

God sakes I'm not trying to argue,I just want to understand.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

That said, lots of women lower their ideal standard on here even though they're in the minority because they still don't attract the guys they really want.

"

I've never dropped my standards. If you put every guy I've slept with in a room it would look like a police line up cos they'd all for the same description. Over 6ft, dark hair, large penis, handsome face with strong jawline and big eyebrows.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

Nobody is attacking you! I just want to understand what you mean."

You have come across as belligerent on this thread because it has been repeatedly explained, no one is forcing you to accept the explanation but what specifically is still puzzling?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *gnitemybodyWoman
over a year ago

Onestepoutofthedoor


"The reality is that on the whole men are less choosy than women. When we were at cap dagde we did an experiment along the lines of "would you shag" the person walking past. I think my score was about 90% on the women and Katies about 20% on the men.

So its not about lowering standards as such. If a bloke had both woman A and woman B offering to have sex with him he might fancy woman A more and have sex with her. However if only woman B is offering he will happily have sex with her. That's not a lowering of standards. He still fancies woman B just not as much as Woman A.

Obviously though woman B does not want to feel she is second choice to woman A so any bloke with any sense will not tell her that. "

Ok we may be getting somewhere now...

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

That said, lots of women lower their ideal standard on here even though they're in the minority because they still don't attract the guys they really want.

I've never dropped my standards. If you put every guy I've slept with in a room it would look like a police line up cos they'd all for the same description. Over 6ft, dark hair, large penis, handsome face with strong jawline and big eyebrows. "

Was any one of them more attractive to you than any other. Did they all pose exactly and precisely the same attraction?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"So I think guys will discreetly meet women on here that they would never date or introduce to their mates.

They also cross the gender line in a kinda gay for the stay prison desperate kinda way.

100% agree and the initial part I have suggested is a lowering of standards...

However I fear I will be crucified prior to completing my point by the willfully ignorant spouting vitriolical terms.

But that's what people were saying you were implying and you said it wasn't. It was nothing to do with attraction, just Fucking a different type of person.

You are so desperately trying to be some sort of pseudo intellectual you have managed to confuse yourself lol

All you needed to say is 'lads, is any hole a goal on here for you?'

No offence am born and bread on a council estate in Liverpool. Intellectual am not.

Am confused about nothing I merely posed a question that you saw fit to attack and disect to nuance your perspective.

I clearly set the parameters around why the question was being posed. It's not a simple as any holes a goal that polarises it... like I said there's a lot of grey.

Please don't attack me again it's not fair I've only asked a question.

But surely the whole point of a discussion is to discect the question posed? Getting other people's perspective on the motive and intention behind the question.

Your further posts on the subject have contradicted what you say is your stance, many times. I and other posters have simply tried to clarify your point.

I think the most telling post that shows your motive is the one where you state that some verifications could be done under the trade descriptions act. You don't understand how some men can find women sexy when you don't think they are.

"

My god women how wrong can one person be... your spouting nonsense again.

I am none specific in describing what a 10 or a 3 is. This differs from person to person. For that reason attraction is in many many forms. Truly subjective.

Which is why I used the shades of grey analogy which you attacked too.

Point being here. Your cage is rattled and your now a heat seeking missile looking for offence and being degroatory in your terms to me.

Now place you dainty hooves in some warm water and calm down dear it's only a question .

Mwah x

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *eavenscentitCouple
over a year ago

barnstaple


"Men complain about not getting meets, then insult women on here that do meet - same old double standard around sex.

'Some' men. . But the negativity of some people's views and voices are the ones that stand out and take centre stage in life. Sad but true. "

You look lovely. I will drop my standards for you ha ha

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Most men wouldn't admit to 'lowering their standards', even if it were true, and no woman wants to know, so this thread was never going to go well

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *gnitemybodyWoman
over a year ago

Onestepoutofthedoor


"

Nobody is attacking you! I just want to understand what you mean.

You have come across as belligerent on this thread because it has been repeatedly explained, no one is forcing you to accept the explanation but what specifically is still puzzling?"

Explained poorly in my opinion. All I wanted to know is what it meant to him without going around the houses and he's still not answered.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *lem-H-FandangoMan
over a year ago

salisbury


"So lowering your standards mean's someone you don't find attractive?!

Absolutely not.

Attraction isn't black and white is it?

There's a loooooad of grey.

I wanna know how the environment effects the guys greyscale.

Here!"

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *loswingersCouple
over a year ago

Gloucester

This whole dropping of standards is nonsensical in my opinion . We have probably had more meets than the combined total of every poster on here , and can honestly say we've never dropped our standards . That's not because we don't have any , or that our criteria is low either . It's because each and every meet has its own merits , which at the time match what we want .

I know it's different for single men , some don't have the same multitude of choices that we have , but I sure hope not too many that have met us have done so after dropping their standards

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"The reality is that on the whole men are less choosy than women. When we were at cap dagde we did an experiment along the lines of "would you shag" the person walking past. I think my score was about 90% on the women and Katies about 20% on the men.

So its not about lowering standards as such. If a bloke had both woman A and woman B offering to have sex with him he might fancy woman A more and have sex with her. However if only woman B is offering he will happily have sex with her. That's not a lowering of standards. He still fancies woman B just not as much as Woman A.

Obviously though woman B does not want to feel she is second choice to woman A so any bloke with any sense will not tell her that. "

Spot on!

Especially the sycophantic reference.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *edonisticbikerUKMan
over a year ago

Coleshill and Rushden


"

That said, lots of women lower their ideal standard on here even though they're in the minority because they still don't attract the guys they really want.

I've never dropped my standards. If you put every guy I've slept with in a room it would look like a police line up cos they'd all for the same description. Over 6ft, dark hair, large penis, handsome face with strong jawline and big eyebrows. "

Big eyebrows I've got Eugene Levy (Jims dad American pie) natural eyebrows does that mean I should stop plucking if women like big? LOL

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

That said, lots of women lower their ideal standard on here even though they're in the minority because they still don't attract the guys they really want.

I've never dropped my standards. If you put every guy I've slept with in a room it would look like a police line up cos they'd all for the same description. Over 6ft, dark hair, large penis, handsome face with strong jawline and big eyebrows.

Was any one of them more attractive to you than any other. Did they all pose exactly and precisely the same attraction?"

They were all met at different points of time so never had to compare any of them to each other. If I had to pick out of the same pool of guys to sleep with I'd go for the army guy I dated but that's more to do with his attitude and personality.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Most men wouldn't admit to 'lowering their standards', even if it were true, and no woman wants to know, so this thread was never going to go well "

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

That said, lots of women lower their ideal standard on here even though they're in the minority because they still don't attract the guys they really want.

I've never dropped my standards. If you put every guy I've slept with in a room it would look like a police line up cos they'd all for the same description. Over 6ft, dark hair, large penis, handsome face with strong jawline and big eyebrows.

Was any one of them more attractive to you than any other. Did they all pose exactly and precisely the same attraction?

They were all met at different points of time so never had to compare any of them to each other. If I had to pick out of the same pool of guys to sleep with I'd go for the army guy I dated but that's more to do with his attitude and personality. "

In that case the others are a lower standard.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I don't think I look at the guys I meet on a linear scale of attraction which is what you seem to be doing when saying one is more attractive than the other. The guys I find attractive all have something uniquely attractive about them so I'm not sure how that fits in on the whole standards debate.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Personally I'd say yes, I do drop my standards, in so much as I wouldn't date in real life people I would meet on here...

purely because in real life I look for the full package things like looks, prospects, personalities, family dynamics, marital status, future goals, lifestyle, location etc... but here it's only a few hours of nothing more than sex so majority of my usual standards don't come into that.

Lowering standards solely on fab meets, no if anything my standards get raised to out the idiots, the ignorant, the any hole will do mingers and crap sex.

Think questions like this hit a nerve, that's why some people have added an opinion only to voice an issue with it rather than answer it.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

last word

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"

Nobody is attacking you! I just want to understand what you mean.

You have come across as belligerent on this thread because it has been repeatedly explained, no one is forcing you to accept the explanation but what specifically is still puzzling?

Explained poorly in my opinion. All I wanted to know is what it meant to him without going around the houses and he's still not answered. "

but I did answer, as other people have also pointed out to you.

The fact you do not like, for whatever reason - the answer is not really my problem. I am not your teacher.

It's been given in simplistic terms.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *gnitemybodyWoman
over a year ago

Onestepoutofthedoor


"

Nobody is attacking you! I just want to understand what you mean.

You have come across as belligerent on this thread because it has been repeatedly explained, no one is forcing you to accept the explanation but what specifically is still puzzling?"

Explained poorly in my opinion. All I wanted to know is what it meant to him without going around the houses and he's still not answered.

Never did get an answer.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


" Last word "

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

Nobody is attacking you! I just want to understand what you mean.

You have come across as belligerent on this thread because it has been repeatedly explained, no one is forcing you to accept the explanation but what specifically is still puzzling?

Explained poorly in my opinion. All I wanted to know is what it meant to him without going around the houses and he's still not answered. "

He has explained it and so have others. Women drop their ideal preferred standards too, at the end of the day its about what you can get as opposed to what you want.

Some guys have got very lucky on here by being in the right place at the right time for a very attractive women who was extremely horny and needing sex. It doesn't mean she'd normally let him chat her up in a bar!

Supply and demand effects that, it's a natural law.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *gnitemybodyWoman
over a year ago

Onestepoutofthedoor

Coffee time.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 
 

By *lowercandyWoman
over a year ago

Lancashire

I understood your post.

Unfortunately I didn't understand why (even being curious of the answers) you would waste your time posting it.

Most things posted in the forums either

go off track

Get the OP or other respondents "attacked"

Nearly always "end in tears"

Sometimes I wonder the point of having them when so much offence (mostly unintentionally) is given/taken

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
back to top