Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to The Lounge |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"How did this last September... "Sadiq Khan has said he believes the threat of terror attacks are “part and parcel of living in a big city” and encouraged Londoners to be vigilant to combat dangers. The Mayor of London revealed he had a “sleepless night” after the recent bombing in New York, and said major cities around the world “have got to be prepared for these sorts of things” to happen when people least expect them. “That means being vigilant, having a police force that is in touch with communities, it means the security services being ready, but it also means exchanging ideas and best practice”, Mr Khan told the Evening Standard shortly before a meeting with New York mayor Bill de Blasio" Become this yesterday... "Terror attacks are part and parcel of living in a big city" " In my opinion. That's the kind of thing a cunt would say. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"It only became that to Trump " I'd already seen it on a few FB sites before Trump Jr. got involved. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"How did this last September... "Sadiq Khan has said he believes the threat of terror attacks are “part and parcel of living in a big city” and encouraged Londoners to be vigilant to combat dangers. The Mayor of London revealed he had a “sleepless night” after the recent bombing in New York, and said major cities around the world “have got to be prepared for these sorts of things” to happen when people least expect them. “That means being vigilant, having a police force that is in touch with communities, it means the security services being ready, but it also means exchanging ideas and best practice”, Mr Khan told the Evening Standard shortly before a meeting with New York mayor Bill de Blasio" Become this yesterday... "Terror attacks are part and parcel of living in a big city" In my opinion. That's the kind of thing a cunt would say. " What? Which part of his original quote could you take umbrage with? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Because he is a muslim himself, so dont want to say the truth." What  | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Because he is a muslim himself, so dont want to say the truth." Still at it then Shag. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| Reply privately |
"Because he is a muslim himself, so dont want to say the truth." What 'truth'? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He doesn't want to alienate the Muslim vote so he will say that. Afterall, he is protected from any terrorist attack. It will be the poor policeman guarding him who will get killed" So major cities in the UK, Europe and the US aren't constantly under threat of attack and don't need to be vigilant then? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He doesn't want to alienate the Muslim vote so he will say that. Afterall, he is protected from any terrorist attack. It will be the poor policeman guarding him who will get killed" That is what I meant too. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He doesn't want to alienate the Muslim vote so he will say that. Afterall, he is protected from any terrorist attack. It will be the poor policeman guarding him who will get killed So major cities in the UK, Europe and the US aren't constantly under threat of attack and don't need to be vigilant then?" What? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He doesn't want to alienate the Muslim vote so he will say that. Afterall, he is protected from any terrorist attack. It will be the poor policeman guarding him who will get killedThat is what I meant too." I'm still trying to get to the bottom of how anything he originally said, before it was misquoted, could be construed as appeasing the Muslim vote? Or is it just because he's a Muslim that you don't like him? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He doesn't want to alienate the Muslim vote so he will say that. Afterall, he is protected from any terrorist attack. It will be the poor policeman guarding him who will get killed So major cities in the UK, Europe and the US aren't constantly under threat of attack and don't need to be vigilant then? What?" It was a fairly simple question. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He doesn't want to alienate the Muslim vote so he will say that. Afterall, he is protected from any terrorist attack. It will be the poor policeman guarding him who will get killed So major cities in the UK, Europe and the US aren't constantly under threat of attack and don't need to be vigilant then? What? It was a fairly simple question." What is the fairly simple question and why are you asking me? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He doesn't want to alienate the Muslim vote so he will say that. Afterall, he is protected from any terrorist attack. It will be the poor policeman guarding him who will get killedThat is what I meant too. I'm still trying to get to the bottom of how anything he originally said, before it was misquoted, could be construed as appeasing the Muslim vote? Or is it just because he's a Muslim that you don't like him?" I like him, but he doesnt tell that community like we need to stop this or something similar. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He doesn't want to alienate the Muslim vote so he will say that. Afterall, he is protected from any terrorist attack. It will be the poor policeman guarding him who will get killed" When will idiots learn Some terrorists are Christians some are Irish some are white and some are Muslim NOT "all brown people are terrorists" I think the point of the thread was Mr khan made an articulate dialogue regarding city living and it's unfortunate risk and how vocalising the risk could lead to improving security of people Where as the right wing extremist across the pond has destroyed the sentiment and brain farted an insensitive mis quote | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Because he is a muslim himself, so dont want to say the truth." Oh Shag, come on... | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He doesn't want to alienate the Muslim vote so he will say that. Afterall, he is protected from any terrorist attack. It will be the poor policeman guarding him who will get killed So major cities in the UK, Europe and the US aren't constantly under threat of attack and don't need to be vigilant then? What? It was a fairly simple question. What is the fairly simple question and why are you asking me?" The question I asked in response to you saying that he doesn't want to alienate the Muslim vote. It refers back to his original quote. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He doesn't want to alienate the Muslim vote so he will say that. Afterall, he is protected from any terrorist attack. It will be the poor policeman guarding him who will get killedThat is what I meant too. I'm still trying to get to the bottom of how anything he originally said, before it was misquoted, could be construed as appeasing the Muslim vote? Or is it just because he's a Muslim that you don't like him?I like him, but he doesnt tell that community like we need to stop this or something similar." Probably because it's not 'that community', it's isolated nutters. Similar to the guy that killed Jo Cox...which 'community' needed telling in that instance? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Because he is a muslim himself, so dont want to say the truth. Oh Shag, come on..." I know, he doesnt adres the problem to the public. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He doesn't want to alienate the Muslim vote so he will say that. Afterall, he is protected from any terrorist attack. It will be the poor policeman guarding him who will get killed When will idiots learn Some terrorists are Christians some are Irish some are white and some are Muslim NOT "all brown people are terrorists" I think the point of the thread was Mr khan made an articulate dialogue regarding city living and it's unfortunate risk and how vocalising the risk could lead to improving security of people Where as the right wing extremist across the pond has destroyed the sentiment and brain farted an insensitive mis quote " "Terror attacks are part and parcel of living in a big city" It doesn't have to be like that. Most terror attacks, in London, over the last few years have been carried out by Muslims Yes, yes, yes; these *could* have been carried out by Christian, Hindus and Buddhist as well. But the fact is that these were carried out by muslims | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He doesn't want to alienate the Muslim vote so he will say that. Afterall, he is protected from any terrorist attack. It will be the poor policeman guarding him who will get killedThat is what I meant too. I'm still trying to get to the bottom of how anything he originally said, before it was misquoted, could be construed as appeasing the Muslim vote? Or is it just because he's a Muslim that you don't like him?I like him, but he doesnt tell that community like we need to stop this or something similar. Probably because it's not 'that community', it's isolated nutters. Similar to the guy that killed Jo Cox...which 'community' needed telling in that instance?" Quite so. Young white men shoot up schools in the US all the time, yet we never suggest there is a general issue with that group of people. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He doesn't want to alienate the Muslim vote so he will say that. Afterall, he is protected from any terrorist attack. It will be the poor policeman guarding him who will get killed When will idiots learn Some terrorists are Christians some are Irish some are white and some are Muslim NOT "all brown people are terrorists" I think the point of the thread was Mr khan made an articulate dialogue regarding city living and it's unfortunate risk and how vocalising the risk could lead to improving security of people Where as the right wing extremist across the pond has destroyed the sentiment and brain farted an insensitive mis quote "Terror attacks are part and parcel of living in a big city" It doesn't have to be like that. Most terror attacks, in London, over the last few years have been carried out by Muslims Yes, yes, yes; these *could* have been carried out by Christian, Hindus and Buddhist as well. But the fact is that these were carried out by muslims" See, you've missed the point again by quoting the misquote! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He doesn't want to alienate the Muslim vote so he will say that. Afterall, he is protected from any terrorist attack. It will be the poor policeman guarding him who will get killed When will idiots learn Some terrorists are Christians some are Irish some are white and some are Muslim NOT "all brown people are terrorists" I think the point of the thread was Mr khan made an articulate dialogue regarding city living and it's unfortunate risk and how vocalising the risk could lead to improving security of people Where as the right wing extremist across the pond has destroyed the sentiment and brain farted an insensitive mis quote "Terror attacks are part and parcel of living in a big city" It doesn't have to be like that. Most terror attacks, in London, over the last few years have been carried out by Muslims Yes, yes, yes; these *could* have been carried out by Christian, Hindus and Buddhist as well. But the fact is that these were carried out by muslims See, you've missed the point again by quoting the misquote! " And your point is that practically all terrorist attacks in London in atleast the last decade weren't carried out by muslims? See, you have missed the point, yet again | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He doesn't want to alienate the Muslim vote so he will say that. Afterall, he is protected from any terrorist attack. It will be the poor policeman guarding him who will get killed When will idiots learn Some terrorists are Christians some are Irish some are white and some are Muslim NOT "all brown people are terrorists" I think the point of the thread was Mr khan made an articulate dialogue regarding city living and it's unfortunate risk and how vocalising the risk could lead to improving security of people Where as the right wing extremist across the pond has destroyed the sentiment and brain farted an insensitive mis quote "Terror attacks are part and parcel of living in a big city" It doesn't have to be like that. Most terror attacks, in London, over the last few years have been carried out by Muslims Yes, yes, yes; these *could* have been carried out by Christian, Hindus and Buddhist as well. But the fact is that these were carried out by muslims" I have no idea what your point is ? Birmingham pub bombings and a vast number of others were perpetrated by white Christians Please tell me you're not trying to suggest Muslims as a group are bad , should all be considered guilty and discriminated against with rights reductions ? Because surely no one is that ignorant other than trump surely ? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He doesn't want to alienate the Muslim vote so he will say that. Afterall, he is protected from any terrorist attack. It will be the poor policeman guarding him who will get killed" Protected from any terrorist attack in what way? Please enlighten | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He doesn't want to alienate the Muslim vote so he will say that. Afterall, he is protected from any terrorist attack. It will be the poor policeman guarding him who will get killed Protected from any terrorist attack in what way? Please enlighten " The same way as the parliament was protected by the policeman who was killed by the terrorist yesterday Are you now enlightened? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He doesn't want to alienate the Muslim vote so he will say that. Afterall, he is protected from any terrorist attack. It will be the poor policeman guarding him who will get killed Protected from any terrorist attack in what way? Please enlighten The same way as the parliament was protected by the policeman who was killed by the terrorist yesterday Are you now enlightened?" Tell that to Airey Neeve and Lord Mountbatten! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He doesn't want to alienate the Muslim vote so he will say that. Afterall, he is protected from any terrorist attack. It will be the poor policeman guarding him who will get killed When will idiots learn Some terrorists are Christians some are Irish some are white and some are Muslim NOT "all brown people are terrorists" I think the point of the thread was Mr khan made an articulate dialogue regarding city living and it's unfortunate risk and how vocalising the risk could lead to improving security of people Where as the right wing extremist across the pond has destroyed the sentiment and brain farted an insensitive mis quote "Terror attacks are part and parcel of living in a big city" It doesn't have to be like that. Most terror attacks, in London, over the last few years have been carried out by Muslims Yes, yes, yes; these *could* have been carried out by Christian, Hindus and Buddhist as well. But the fact is that these were carried out by muslims I have no idea what your point is ? Birmingham pub bombings and a vast number of others were perpetrated by white Christians Please tell me you're not trying to suggest Muslims as a group are bad , should all be considered guilty and discriminated against with rights reductions ? Because surely no one is that ignorant other than trump surely ?" Do you actually read comments before jumping to conclusions I am commenting about attacks in London; not attacks in Timbuktu or Birmingham | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Because he is a muslim himself, so dont want to say the truth." Do you want to tell us all what the truth is Shag? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He doesn't want to alienate the Muslim vote so he will say that. Afterall, he is protected from any terrorist attack. It will be the poor policeman guarding him who will get killed Protected from any terrorist attack in what way? Please enlighten The same way as the parliament was protected by the policeman who was killed by the terrorist yesterday Are you now enlightened? Tell that to Airey Neeve and Lord Mountbatten!" You tell 'em; I wasn't born then. I am more concerned about the here and now and not much about the dawn of man | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He doesn't want to alienate the Muslim vote so he will say that. Afterall, he is protected from any terrorist attack. It will be the poor policeman guarding him who will get killed Protected from any terrorist attack in what way? Please enlighten The same way as the parliament was protected by the policeman who was killed by the terrorist yesterday Are you now enlightened? Tell that to Airey Neeve and Lord Mountbatten! You tell 'em; I wasn't born then. I am more concerned about the here and now and not much about the dawn of man" So you don't believe that history informs the present in any way? That probably explains your attitude on this and other threads quite succinctly. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He doesn't want to alienate the Muslim vote so he will say that. Afterall, he is protected from any terrorist attack. It will be the poor policeman guarding him who will get killed When will idiots learn Some terrorists are Christians some are Irish some are white and some are Muslim " You're right idiots never learn. So far this year there have been 467 Islamic attacks in 37 countries, in which 3198 people have been killed and 3895 injured. I don't know the figures for Christian, white and Irish terrorism ...so tell me? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Because he is a muslim himself, so dont want to say the truth. Do you want to tell us all what the truth is Shag? " I already explained it | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He doesn't want to alienate the Muslim vote so he will say that. Afterall, he is protected from any terrorist attack. It will be the poor policeman guarding him who will get killed Protected from any terrorist attack in what way? Please enlighten The same way as the parliament was protected by the policeman who was killed by the terrorist yesterday Are you now enlightened? Tell that to Airey Neeve and Lord Mountbatten! You tell 'em; I wasn't born then. I am more concerned about the here and now and not much about the dawn of man So you don't believe that history informs the present in any way? That probably explains your attitude on this and other threads quite succinctly." You worry about the last 1,000 years and what happened in faraway lands I'll worry about what is happening now where I live. And yes, that explains my attitude about the terrorist attacks in London | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Because he is a muslim himself, so dont want to say the truth. Do you want to tell us all what the truth is Shag? I already explained it" No you didn't, you vaguely agreed with someone else's point. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He doesn't want to alienate the Muslim vote so he will say that. Afterall, he is protected from any terrorist attack. It will be the poor policeman guarding him who will get killed Protected from any terrorist attack in what way? Please enlighten The same way as the parliament was protected by the policeman who was killed by the terrorist yesterday Are you now enlightened? Tell that to Airey Neeve and Lord Mountbatten! You tell 'em; I wasn't born then. I am more concerned about the here and now and not much about the dawn of man" And you were about 9 years old when they died, unless you've added years on to your age on here, which would be unusual in itself! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Because he is a muslim himself, so dont want to say the truth. Do you want to tell us all what the truth is Shag? I already explained it No you didn't, you vaguely agreed with someone else's point. " Yes which covered what I meant. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He doesn't want to alienate the Muslim vote so he will say that. Afterall, he is protected from any terrorist attack. It will be the poor policeman guarding him who will get killed Protected from any terrorist attack in what way? Please enlighten The same way as the parliament was protected by the policeman who was killed by the terrorist yesterday Are you now enlightened? Tell that to Airey Neeve and Lord Mountbatten! You tell 'em; I wasn't born then. I am more concerned about the here and now and not much about the dawn of man And you were about 9 years old when they died, unless you've added years on to your age on here, which would be unusual in itself!" And? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He doesn't want to alienate the Muslim vote so he will say that. Afterall, he is protected from any terrorist attack. It will be the poor policeman guarding him who will get killed Protected from any terrorist attack in what way? Please enlighten The same way as the parliament was protected by the policeman who was killed by the terrorist yesterday Are you now enlightened?" So the same way Jo Cox was 'protected from any terrorist attack'?  | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He doesn't want to alienate the Muslim vote so he will say that. Afterall, he is protected from any terrorist attack. It will be the poor policeman guarding him who will get killedThat is what I meant too. I'm still trying to get to the bottom of how anything he originally said, before it was misquoted, could be construed as appeasing the Muslim vote? Or is it just because he's a Muslim that you don't like him?"  | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He doesn't want to alienate the Muslim vote so he will say that. Afterall, he is protected from any terrorist attack. It will be the poor policeman guarding him who will get killed When will idiots learn Some terrorists are Christians some are Irish some are white and some are Muslim You're right idiots never learn. So far this year there have been 467 Islamic attacks in 37 countries, in which 3198 people have been killed and 3895 injured. I don't know the figures for Christian, white and Irish terrorism ...so tell me? " Taking your figures as legitimate how many of those 407 attacks targeted non - muslims? The answer to that may just tell you something | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Sadiq Khan simply stated the reality of the world today. People do not like being told they have to undetsand there is danger in the world and that individuals have to take steps to protect themsleves. Where I lived as a teenager it was white teenage boys who were in danger of being attacked by white teenage boys. We soon learnt to protect ourselves by avoiding the areas and pubs that the trouble mainly occurred in. In a similar way young women can reduce their chance of attack by moderating the dress they adopt. People who live in cities have got to realise some places will be targets of terrorist attacks and take precautions when visiting these places to reduce the chance of them becoming involved. In all the above we could only hope to reduce the chance of being involved not remove it completely." I feel so sorry that you can't control your own behaviour and think that other men can't, in the presence of a woman in clothing you deem to be provocative. By your reasoning, all men are attackers of women and it's the women's fault. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He doesn't want to alienate the Muslim vote so he will say that. Afterall, he is protected from any terrorist attack. It will be the poor policeman guarding him who will get killed Protected from any terrorist attack in what way? Please enlighten The same way as the parliament was protected by the policeman who was killed by the terrorist yesterday Are you now enlightened? So the same way Jo Cox was 'protected from any terrorist attack'? "Yes but he was white so he doesn't really count as a terrorist... | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He doesn't want to alienate the Muslim vote so he will say that. Afterall, he is protected from any terrorist attack. It will be the poor policeman guarding him who will get killed Protected from any terrorist attack in what way? Please enlighten The same way as the parliament was protected by the policeman who was killed by the terrorist yesterday Are you now enlightened? So the same way Jo Cox was 'protected from any terrorist attack'? "I am commenting about the London terrorist attacks in the last decade or so. Joe Cox was in London? If not, then why are you commenting on my comments and asking about her? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He doesn't want to alienate the Muslim vote so he will say that. Afterall, he is protected from any terrorist attack. It will be the poor policeman guarding him who will get killed Protected from any terrorist attack in what way? Please enlighten The same way as the parliament was protected by the policeman who was killed by the terrorist yesterday Are you now enlightened? Tell that to Airey Neeve and Lord Mountbatten! You tell 'em; I wasn't born then. I am more concerned about the here and now and not much about the dawn of man And you were about 9 years old when they died, unless you've added years on to your age on here, which would be unusual in itself! And?" And you were born then! I'd be surprised if you weren't aware of Mountbatten's assassination. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He doesn't want to alienate the Muslim vote so he will say that. Afterall, he is protected from any terrorist attack. It will be the poor policeman guarding him who will get killedThat is what I meant too. I'm still trying to get to the bottom of how anything he originally said, before it was misquoted, could be construed as appeasing the Muslim vote? Or is it just because he's a Muslim that you don't like him? Of course the fact he is a muslim is enough for at least 2 repeatedly open racists that have contributed to this thread. " Liberals will of course be in mourning today... at the death of the muslim nazi traitor. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He doesn't want to alienate the Muslim vote so he will say that. Afterall, he is protected from any terrorist attack. It will be the poor policeman guarding him who will get killedThat is what I meant too. I'm still trying to get to the bottom of how anything he originally said, before it was misquoted, could be construed as appeasing the Muslim vote? Or is it just because he's a Muslim that you don't like him? "I notice that you forgot to quote my reply that I did like him lol. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He doesn't want to alienate the Muslim vote so he will say that. Afterall, he is protected from any terrorist attack. It will be the poor policeman guarding him who will get killed When will idiots learn Some terrorists are Christians some are Irish some are white and some are Muslim NOT "all brown people are terrorists" I think the point of the thread was Mr khan made an articulate dialogue regarding city living and it's unfortunate risk and how vocalising the risk could lead to improving security of people Where as the right wing extremist across the pond has destroyed the sentiment and brain farted an insensitive mis quote "Terror attacks are part and parcel of living in a big city" It doesn't have to be like that. Most terror attacks, in London, over the last few years have been carried out by Muslims Yes, yes, yes; these *could* have been carried out by Christian, Hindus and Buddhist as well. But the fact is that these were carried out by muslims" And? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Because he is a muslim himself, so dont want to say the truth. Do you want to tell us all what the truth is Shag? I already explained it No you didn't, you vaguely agreed with someone else's point. Yes which covered what I meant." What is the truth that Sadie Khan won't admit because he's a Muslim? The post you agreed with in no way explained that comment | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"There's neither enough face or enough palm for this thread. OP, I get what you were getting at. And I think Mr Khan is correct in his original statement. " | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He doesn't want to alienate the Muslim vote so he will say that. Afterall, he is protected from any terrorist attack. It will be the poor policeman guarding him who will get killed Protected from any terrorist attack in what way? Please enlighten The same way as the parliament was protected by the policeman who was killed by the terrorist yesterday Are you now enlightened? Tell that to Airey Neeve and Lord Mountbatten! You tell 'em; I wasn't born then. I am more concerned about the here and now and not much about the dawn of man And you were about 9 years old when they died, unless you've added years on to your age on here, which would be unusual in itself! And? And you were born then! I'd be surprised if you weren't aware of Mountbatten's assassination." I was born in Germany and came to London less 20 years ago. I don't know or care about assassinations throughout the world which happened 40 years ago Once again, and for the last time; all my comments on this thread are about terrorist attacks carried out in London over the last decade or so. You obviously want to make more out of it | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Because he is a muslim himself, so dont want to say the truth. Do you want to tell us all what the truth is Shag? I already explained it No you didn't, you vaguely agreed with someone else's point. Yes which covered what I meant. What is the truth that Sadie Khan won't admit because he's a Muslim? The post you agreed with in no way explained that comment " Yes it did. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He doesn't want to alienate the Muslim vote so he will say that. Afterall, he is protected from any terrorist attack. It will be the poor policeman guarding him who will get killedThat is what I meant too. I'm still trying to get to the bottom of how anything he originally said, before it was misquoted, could be construed as appeasing the Muslim vote? Or is it just because he's a Muslim that you don't like him? Of course the fact he is a muslim is enough for at least 2 repeatedly open racists that have contributed to this thread. Liberals will of course be in mourning today... at the death of the muslim nazi traitor. " Talking of faces and palms... | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"So the same way Jo Cox was 'protected from any terrorist attack'?
I am commenting about the London terrorist attacks in the last decade or so. Joe Cox was in London? If not, then why are you commenting on my comments and asking about her?"Any threat to the wellbeing of Sadiq Khan, or any other MP, terrorist related or not, is not limited to vicinity of London. As we have identified, terrorist attacks in the UK within the last decade or two, is also not limited to London. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"There's neither enough face or enough palm for this thread. OP, I get what you were getting at. And I think Mr Khan is correct in his original statement. " | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Because he is a muslim himself, so dont want to say the truth. Do you want to tell us all what the truth is Shag? I already explained it No you didn't, you vaguely agreed with someone else's point. Yes which covered what I meant. What is the truth that Sadie Khan won't admit because he's a Muslim? The post you agreed with in no way explained that comment Yes it did." As ever on the subject of Muslims you post an ill informed comment that you can in no way expand on or explain. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Because he is a muslim himself, so dont want to say the truth. Do you want to tell us all what the truth is Shag? I already explained it No you didn't, you vaguely agreed with someone else's point. Yes which covered what I meant. What is the truth that Sadie Khan won't admit because he's a Muslim? The post you agreed with in no way explained that comment Yes it did. As ever on the subject of Muslims you post an ill informed comment that you can in no way expand on or explain. " Maibe check the rules about getting personal. I know it can be hard to follow. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Because he is a muslim himself, so dont want to say the truth. Do you want to tell us all what the truth is Shag? I already explained it No you didn't, you vaguely agreed with someone else's point. Yes which covered what I meant. What is the truth that Sadie Khan won't admit because he's a Muslim? The post you agreed with in no way explained that comment Yes it did. As ever on the subject of Muslims you post an ill informed comment that you can in no way expand on or explain. Maibe check the rules about getting personal. I know it can be hard to follow." I have merely made an observation on your repeated reluctance to substantiate or expand on your frequent inflammatory comments. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Oh ffs; I really do need a face palm emoticon here I am not talking about terrorist attacks any where else in the world. This thread was about the LONDON mayor and what he said and I have commented on the LONDON terrorist attacks since I have been living here You are welcome to start a comment or a thread on terrorist attacks in the last 100/1,000 years all over the world. But don't ask me about those as those don't affect me and I have NOT commented about those Some folk are so thick ..... The London Mayor's comments were about any such attacks in big cities. The comments last year, and that have been rephrased in the last 24 hours, are not specific to London. They are a warning to inhabitants of, and visitors to, big cities to be mindful. " A warning? Does he actually believe that people in London don't know about these attacks??? Instead of issuing warnings, he should be doing something about these attacks. He is the Mayor of London. He should be coming up with concrete plans to protect us rather than issuing completely useless warnings | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Because he is a muslim himself, so dont want to say the truth. Do you want to tell us all what the truth is Shag? I already explained it No you didn't, you vaguely agreed with someone else's point. Yes which covered what I meant. What is the truth that Sadie Khan won't admit because he's a Muslim? The post you agreed with in no way explained that comment Yes it did. As ever on the subject of Muslims you post an ill informed comment that you can in no way expand on or explain. Maibe check the rules about getting personal. I know it can be hard to follow. I have merely made an observation on your repeated reluctance to substantiate or expand on your frequent inflammatory comments. "Yawnnnnnnn | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" A warning? Does he actually believe that people in London don't know about these attacks??? Instead of issuing warnings, he should be doing something about these attacks. He is the Mayor of London. He should be coming up with concrete plans to protect us rather than issuing completely useless warnings Josie - in reality there's only so much that can be done to stop something like this. I could quite easily drive my care along a pavement anywhere in the world and then charge at a policeman with a knife - the Mayor, and nobody else can stop such an attack. Be reasonable. As was stated in another thread, we have more surveillance than any other country in the Western world (Western Europe at the very least) and have probably stopped any number of these attacks over the years but you can't legislate for everything. If he's not known to security forces and has used nothing more than a car and a knife, what is there to flag up?" Exactly. The UK, and London in particular is absolutely saturated with security cameras and police on duty - you cannot, and never will be able to legislate for everything that happens. I find this thread quite unsavoury, and in parts, somewhat offensive to be honest. Sadiq Khan has done nothing wrong. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" A warning? Does he actually believe that people in London don't know about these attacks??? Instead of issuing warnings, he should be doing something about these attacks. He is the Mayor of London. He should be coming up with concrete plans to protect us rather than issuing completely useless warnings Josie - in reality there's only so much that can be done to stop something like this. I could quite easily drive my care along a pavement anywhere in the world and then charge at a policeman with a knife - the Mayor, and nobody else can stop such an attack. Be reasonable. As was stated in another thread, we have more surveillance than any other country in the Western world (Western Europe at the very least) and have probably stopped any number of these attacks over the years but you can't legislate for everything. If he's not known to security forces and has used nothing more than a car and a knife, what is there to flag up? Exactly. The UK, and London in particular is absolutely saturated with security cameras and police on duty - you cannot, and never will be able to legislate for everything that happens. I find this thread quite unsavoury, and in parts, somewhat offensive to be honest. Sadiq Khan has done nothing wrong." I agree, some of the comments look like covert racism to me | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" A warning? Does he actually believe that people in London don't know about these attacks??? Instead of issuing warnings, he should be doing something about these attacks. He is the Mayor of London. He should be coming up with concrete plans to protect us rather than issuing completely useless warnings Josie - in reality there's only so much that can be done to stop something like this. I could quite easily drive my care along a pavement anywhere in the world and then charge at a policeman with a knife - the Mayor, and nobody else can stop such an attack. Be reasonable. As was stated in another thread, we have more surveillance than any other country in the Western world (Western Europe at the very least) and have probably stopped any number of these attacks over the years but you can't legislate for everything. If he's not known to security forces and has used nothing more than a car and a knife, what is there to flag up? Exactly. The UK, and London in particular is absolutely saturated with security cameras and police on duty - you cannot, and never will be able to legislate for everything that happens. I find this thread quite unsavoury, and in parts, somewhat offensive to be honest. Sadiq Khan has done nothing wrong." I stupidly expected a discourse on how quotes can be taken out of context to give them a completely different meaning, particularly when dates aren't referenced at all. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" Josie - in reality there's only so much that can be done to stop something like this. I could quite easily drive my care along a pavement anywhere in the world and then charge at a policeman with a knife - the Mayor, and nobody else can stop such an attack. Be reasonable. I agree with what you say My point was that the warnings he is issuing are patronising. Or does he really think that the folk in London are sooooooo stupid that they need to be told to be vigilant after so many terrorist attacks have been carried out here? And yes, he can do something about it. There can be more armed police at stations, etc. There is some but not nearly enough. He could also keep more of the 'radicalised' people under surveillance, whether they are muslim or not Not all attacks will stop but he could take concrete steps to reduce the occurrence. The duration between these attacks is decreasing and as a Mayor, he should be leading at stopping this" I think you might be confusing the Mayor's role with the security services. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" Josie - in reality there's only so much that can be done to stop something like this. I could quite easily drive my care along a pavement anywhere in the world and then charge at a policeman with a knife - the Mayor, and nobody else can stop such an attack. Be reasonable. I agree with what you say My point was that the warnings he is issuing are patronising. Or does he really think that the folk in London are sooooooo stupid that they need to be told to be vigilant after so many terrorist attacks have been carried out here? And yes, he can do something about it. There can be more armed police at stations, etc. There is some but not nearly enough. He could also keep more of the 'radicalised' people under surveillance, whether they are muslim or not Not all attacks will stop but he could take concrete steps to reduce the occurrence. The duration between these attacks is decreasing and as a Mayor, he should be leading at stopping this I think you might be confusing the Mayor's role with the security services. " No, I am not. He Should be talking to the security forces about this instead of warning us about the bl**dy obvious | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Oh ffs; I really do need a face palm emoticon here I am not talking about terrorist attacks any where else in the world. This thread was about the LONDON mayor and what he said and I have commented on the LONDON terrorist attacks since I have been living here You are welcome to start a comment or a thread on terrorist attacks in the last 100/1,000 years all over the world. But don't ask me about those as those don't affect me and I have NOT commented about those Some folk are so thick ..... The London Mayor's comments were about any such attacks in big cities. The comments last year, and that have been rephrased in the last 24 hours, are not specific to London. They are a warning to inhabitants of, and visitors to, big cities to be mindful. A warning? Does he actually believe that people in London don't know about these attacks??? Instead of issuing warnings, he should be doing something about these attacks. He is the Mayor of London. He should be coming up with concrete plans to protect us rather than issuing completely useless warnings Josie - in reality there's only so much that can be done to stop something like this. I could quite easily drive my care along a pavement anywhere in the world and then charge at a policeman with a knife - the Mayor, and nobody else can stop such an attack. Be reasonable. I agree with what you say My point was that the warnings he is issuing are patronising. Or does he really think that the folk in London are sooooooo stupid that they need to be told to be vigilant after so many terrorist attacks have been carried out here? And yes, he can do something about it. There can be more armed police at stations, etc. There is some but not nearly enough. He could also keep more of the 'radicalised' people under surveillance, whether they are muslim or not Not all attacks will stop but he could take concrete steps to reduce the occurrence. The duration between these attacks is decreasing and as a Mayor, he should be leading at stopping this" As someone who has said that they are not bothered by history and only interested in current events perhaps you are not aware of the importance this country has placed on having an unarmed police force. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" Josie - in reality there's only so much that can be done to stop something like this. I could quite easily drive my care along a pavement anywhere in the world and then charge at a policeman with a knife - the Mayor, and nobody else can stop such an attack. Be reasonable. I agree with what you say My point was that the warnings he is issuing are patronising. Or does he really think that the folk in London are sooooooo stupid that they need to be told to be vigilant after so many terrorist attacks have been carried out here? And yes, he can do something about it. There can be more armed police at stations, etc. There is some but not nearly enough. He could also keep more of the 'radicalised' people under surveillance, whether they are muslim or not Not all attacks will stop but he could take concrete steps to reduce the occurrence. The duration between these attacks is decreasing and as a Mayor, he should be leading at stopping this I think you might be confusing the Mayor's role with the security services. No, I am not. He Should be talking to the security forces about this instead of warning us about the bl**dy obvious" I would expect that he's done a few other things in the last 24 hours, other than just issue a statement to the public, Josie. Probably best if those are kept under wraps though, eh. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Oh ffs; I really do need a face palm emoticon here I am not talking about terrorist attacks any where else in the world. This thread was about the LONDON mayor and what he said and I have commented on the LONDON terrorist attacks since I have been living here You are welcome to start a comment or a thread on terrorist attacks in the last 100/1,000 years all over the world. But don't ask me about those as those don't affect me and I have NOT commented about those Some folk are so thick ..... The London Mayor's comments were about any such attacks in big cities. The comments last year, and that have been rephrased in the last 24 hours, are not specific to London. They are a warning to inhabitants of, and visitors to, big cities to be mindful. A warning? Does he actually believe that people in London don't know about these attacks??? Instead of issuing warnings, he should be doing something about these attacks. He is the Mayor of London. He should be coming up with concrete plans to protect us rather than issuing completely useless warnings Josie - in reality there's only so much that can be done to stop something like this. I could quite easily drive my care along a pavement anywhere in the world and then charge at a policeman with a knife - the Mayor, and nobody else can stop such an attack. Be reasonable. I agree with what you say My point was that the warnings he is issuing are patronising. Or does he really think that the folk in London are sooooooo stupid that they need to be told to be vigilant after so many terrorist attacks have been carried out here? And yes, he can do something about it. There can be more armed police at stations, etc. There is some but not nearly enough. He could also keep more of the 'radicalised' people under surveillance, whether they are muslim or not Not all attacks will stop but he could take concrete steps to reduce the occurrence. The duration between these attacks is decreasing and as a Mayor, he should be leading at stopping this" His warning is no more or less patronising than those from other politicians and police/security forces. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" Josie - in reality there's only so much that can be done to stop something like this. I could quite easily drive my care along a pavement anywhere in the world and then charge at a policeman with a knife - the Mayor, and nobody else can stop such an attack. Be reasonable. I agree with what you say My point was that the warnings he is issuing are patronising. Or does he really think that the folk in London are sooooooo stupid that they need to be told to be vigilant after so many terrorist attacks have been carried out here? And yes, he can do something about it. There can be more armed police at stations, etc. There is some but not nearly enough. He could also keep more of the 'radicalised' people under surveillance, whether they are muslim or not Not all attacks will stop but he could take concrete steps to reduce the occurrence. The duration between these attacks is decreasing and as a Mayor, he should be leading at stopping this I think you might be confusing the Mayor's role with the security services. No, I am not. He Should be talking to the security forces about this instead of warning us about the bl**dy obvious I would expect that he's done a few other things in the last 24 hours, other than just issue a statement to the public, Josie. Probably best if those are kept under wraps though, eh." I hope so And yes, if he has then he is right in not disclosing his plans | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Wasn't this the first (successful, for want of a better word) terrorist attack in London since he became mayor?" I believe so - and also really simple to do. No planning required. Get a knife, get a car, drive it fast over a bridge. Nothing counter-terrorism could do about it. Nothing. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Oh ffs; I really do need a face palm emoticon here I am not talking about terrorist attacks any where else in the world. This thread was about the LONDON mayor and what he said and I have commented on the LONDON terrorist attacks since I have been living here You are welcome to start a comment or a thread on terrorist attacks in the last 100/1,000 years all over the world. But don't ask me about those as those don't affect me and I have NOT commented about those Some folk are so thick ..... The London Mayor's comments were about any such attacks in big cities. The comments last year, and that have been rephrased in the last 24 hours, are not specific to London. They are a warning to inhabitants of, and visitors to, big cities to be mindful. A warning? Does he actually believe that people in London don't know about these attacks??? Instead of issuing warnings, he should be doing something about these attacks. He is the Mayor of London. He should be coming up with concrete plans to protect us rather than issuing completely useless warnings Josie - in reality there's only so much that can be done to stop something like this. I could quite easily drive my care along a pavement anywhere in the world and then charge at a policeman with a knife - the Mayor, and nobody else can stop such an attack. Be reasonable. I agree with what you say My point was that the warnings he is issuing are patronising. Or does he really think that the folk in London are sooooooo stupid that they need to be told to be vigilant after so many terrorist attacks have been carried out here? And yes, he can do something about it. There can be more armed police at stations, etc. There is some but not nearly enough. He could also keep more of the 'radicalised' people under surveillance, whether they are muslim or not Not all attacks will stop but he could take concrete steps to reduce the occurrence. The duration between these attacks is decreasing and as a Mayor, he should be leading at stopping this As someone who has said that they are not bothered by history and only interested in current events perhaps you are not aware of the importance this country has placed on having an unarmed police force." History tells us that there weren't any aircraft 200 years ago so lets then remove the armed police from the airports now. Lets just pretend that in the here and now, the big metal birds are a figment of our imagination and that terrorist are not attacking airports I like this head in the sand approach | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Josie - how do you feel about Theresa May's comments about staying vigilant, being careful, sticking together etc in her statement?" Same drivel. And if there was a thread about her statements, my comments would be no different about her either | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Josie - how do you feel about Theresa May's comments about staying vigilant, being careful, sticking together etc in her statement?" | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" I don't know the figures for Christian, white and Irish terrorism ...so tell me? " I hope posting a URL is ok. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-10866072 And this is solely in the UK. As someone who lived in Northern Ireland for over 10 years I find the idea that terrorism is predominantly a Muslim problem, as the newspapers may have you believe, to be dubious at best. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Josie - how do you feel about Theresa May's comments about staying vigilant, being careful, sticking together etc in her statement? Same drivel. And if there was a thread about her statements, my comments would be no different about her either" | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" I feel so sorry that you can't control your own behaviour and think that other men can't, in the presence of a woman in clothing you deem to be provocative. By your reasoning, all men are attackers of women and it's the women's fault. " We can and do control our own behaviour but knowing some do not then it is up to each and evey one of us to takes steps to avoid the risk. Are you saying it would be safe to walk about with a bundle of £50 notes in your hand, going from pub to pub. You don't think that might cause someone who cannot control themselves to try to take it from you? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The likelihood of being killed by a so called 'terrorist' is extremely low anyway. You're more likely to die in an accident at home. " I am 100% lcertain to die at some point in time of something But I still take steps to prolong my life as much as I can You are welcome to take that very low risk and not want it to be reduced. I am not | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" I feel so sorry that you can't control your own behaviour and think that other men can't, in the presence of a woman in clothing you deem to be provocative. By your reasoning, all men are attackers of women and it's the women's fault. We can and do control our own behaviour but knowing some do not then it is up to each and evey one of us to takes steps to avoid the risk. Are you saying it would be safe to walk about with a bundle of £50 notes in your hand, going from pub to pub. You don't think that might cause someone who cannot control themselves to try to take it from you?" Now you're talking about Routine Activity Theory and Rational Choice Theory  | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The likelihood of being killed by a so called 'terrorist' is extremely low anyway. You're more likely to die in an accident at home. I am 100% lcertain to die at some point in time of something But I still take steps to prolong my life as much as I can You are welcome to take that very low risk and not want it to be reduced. I am not" So when the Mayor and the PM tell you to take steps not to die from something, you think that's patronising, but you want to take steps to prolong your life as much as you can. OK, errr...... | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I don't think he should of publically said that,especially when people are scared already. I don't think it has anything to do with him being muslim. Having said that if boris would of said it would he be facing this amount of backlash? Probably not" HE SAID IT IN 2016 NOT YESTERDAY!!!! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I don't think he should of publically said that,especially when people are scared already. I don't think it has anything to do with him being muslim. Having said that if boris would of said it would he be facing this amount of backlash? Probably not HE SAID IT IN 2016 NOT YESTERDAY!!!!" I'd give up!  | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I don't think he should of publically said that,especially when people are scared already. I don't think it has anything to do with him being muslim. Having said that if boris would of said it would he be facing this amount of backlash? Probably not HE SAID IT IN 2016 NOT YESTERDAY!!!!" OKAY!!!!  | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I don't think he should of publically said that,especially when people are scared already. I don't think it has anything to do with him being muslim. Having said that if boris would of said it would he be facing this amount of backlash? Probably not HE SAID IT IN 2016 NOT YESTERDAY!!!! I'd give up! " Haha, you're right there! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I don't think he should of publically said that,especially when people are scared already. I don't think it has anything to do with him being muslim. Having said that if boris would of said it would he be facing this amount of backlash? Probably not HE SAID IT IN 2016 NOT YESTERDAY!!!!" Doesnt make a slightest bit of difference? Are terror attacks new to 2017 or something | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The likelihood of being killed by a so called 'terrorist' is extremely low anyway. You're more likely to die in an accident at home. I am 100% lcertain to die at some point in time of something But I still take steps to prolong my life as much as I can You are welcome to take that very low risk and not want it to be reduced. I am not So when the Mayor and the PM tell you to take steps not to die from something, you think that's patronising, but you want to take steps to prolong your life as much as you can. OK, errr......" Take my advice. Be careful, Gladitor; you will die of something Hope you will take my advice
I bet you didn't know that before I told you just now | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I don't think he should of publically said that,especially when people are scared already. I don't think it has anything to do with him being muslim. Having said that if boris would of said it would he be facing this amount of backlash? Probably not HE SAID IT IN 2016 NOT YESTERDAY!!!! Doesnt make a slightest bit of difference? Are terror attacks new to 2017 or something "Are you talking about his completely reasonable original interview, or the misquote that's caused all the hurrah? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Would people on this thread report suspicious activity if it involved a muslim or would you be afraid of being called a racist? " It would be 'covert' racism | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Would people on this thread report suspicious activity if it involved a muslim or would you be afraid of being called a racist? " Racist? Muslims come in all colours | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Would people on this thread report suspicious activity if it involved a muslim or would you be afraid of being called a racist? " You can't be called a racist for having bigoted views on someone's religion. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Would people on this thread report suspicious activity if it involved a muslim or would you be afraid of being called a racist? Racist? Muslims come in all colours "Blue and Green too? 
I don't belive you | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"He doesn't want to alienate the Muslim vote so he will say that. Afterall, he is protected from any terrorist attack. It will be the poor policeman guarding him who will get killed When will idiots learn Some terrorists are Christians some are Irish some are white and some are Muslim NOT "all brown people are terrorists" I think the point of the thread was Mr khan made an articulate dialogue regarding city living and it's unfortunate risk and how vocalising the risk could lead to improving security of people Where as the right wing extremist across the pond has destroyed the sentiment and brain farted an insensitive mis quote " Couldn't have put it better myself | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Would people on this thread report suspicious activity if it involved a muslim or would you be afraid of being called a racist? " No they wouldnt dare to, cos of political correctness, sharia law is taking over. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"How did this last September... "Sadiq Khan has said he believes the threat of terror attacks are “part and parcel of living in a big city” and encouraged Londoners to be vigilant to combat dangers. The Mayor of London revealed he had a “sleepless night” after the recent bombing in New York, and said major cities around the world “have got to be prepared for these sorts of things” to happen when people least expect them. “That means being vigilant, having a police force that is in touch with communities, it means the security services being ready, but it also means exchanging ideas and best practice”, Mr Khan told the Evening Standard shortly before a meeting with New York mayor Bill de Blasio" Become this yesterday... "Terror attacks are part and parcel of living in a big city" " . Ahhh. Someone is mixing up the news . Down to d trump junior. And no one else the added comment | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Would people on this thread report suspicious activity if it involved a muslim or would you be afraid of being called a racist? " How would we know if they were a Muslim??  | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Sheikhyerbouti - Manchesterguy - gladiator - reading your comments clearly show we have level headed people on fab unlike some who have coverted racism in them. He has said nothing wrong in his statement, yes maybe stated the obvious but who doesn't? Theresa May did say last night... And wait on, just because he is a Muslim he is immune to terror attack? These attacks are indescriminate meaning it could be anyone from any faith or background killed/hurt. These people wish to create fear and hate - no religion tells them to do that - they do it for own agendas whatever they maybe! If Muslims believed in terrorism that would make 1.4billion walking terrorists on face of the earth... yet Muslims are the biggest victims of terrorism! So please stop with the hate, unite in OUR fight to get rid of scum like these! " Very well said | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Would people on this thread report suspicious activity if it involved a muslim or would you be afraid of being called a racist? How would we know if they were a Muslim?? "How would we know they weren't? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
" Tell that to Airey Neeve and Lord Mountbatten!" The fact is at that time it was the IRA who were the enemy to this country alone. But the muslin extremists hate the western world and any person that doesn't believe it their religion. We all know that all Muslims are not the enemy to us just the same as in the past it wasn't all the Irish! But no the less it was a major problem to our democracy then is it still is now. What can be done god only knows but democracy ended the Irish situation....so I really hope that the same will happen in this present time of trouble. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Would people on this thread report suspicious activity if it involved a muslim or would you be afraid of being called a racist? How would we know if they were a Muslim??
How would we know they weren't?"Exactly my point | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"So the same way Jo Cox was 'protected from any terrorist attack'?
I am commenting about the London terrorist attacks in the last decade or so. Joe Cox was in London? If not, then why are you commenting on my comments and asking about her?
Any threat to the wellbeing of Sadiq Khan, or any other MP, terrorist related or not, is not limited to vicinity of London.
As we have identified, terrorist attacks in the UK within the last decade or two, is also not limited to London.
Oh ffs; I really do need a face palm emoticon here
I am not talking about terrorist attacks any where else in the world. This thread was about the LONDON mayor and what he said and I have commented on the LONDON terrorist attacks since I have been living here
You are welcome to start a comment or a thread on terrorist attacks in the last 100/1,000 years all over the world. But don't ask me about those as those don't affect me and I have NOT commented about those
Some folk are so thick .....
People aren't think... you are trying to narrow it down to small subsections to prove a point...
I was around for Canary Wharf? Were you? Should I hate on Irish people the way you hate on muslims
You can hate anyone you like. It is none of my business
I just hate terrorists and it does not matter to me if they are muslim, green brown or black. Got it?
Not white then
If they were White and in London and in the time I have been here so that it affects me, then yes"So you only care about what affects you? Did yesterday's attacks directly 'affect' you? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Would people on this thread report suspicious activity if it involved a muslim or would you be afraid of being called a racist? How would we know if they were a Muslim??
How would we know they weren't?
Exactly my point "But would it be 'covert racism' if a terrorist was reported in London and he or she was muslim? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Would people on this thread report suspicious activity if it involved a muslim or would you be afraid of being called a racist? How would we know if they were a Muslim??
How would we know they weren't?
Exactly my point "So you wouldn't report suspicious activity just in case. Fair enough | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"So the same way Jo Cox was 'protected from any terrorist attack'?
I am commenting about the London terrorist attacks in the last decade or so. Joe Cox was in London? If not, then why are you commenting on my comments and asking about her?
Any threat to the wellbeing of Sadiq Khan, or any other MP, terrorist related or not, is not limited to vicinity of London.
As we have identified, terrorist attacks in the UK within the last decade or two, is also not limited to London.
Oh ffs; I really do need a face palm emoticon here
I am not talking about terrorist attacks any where else in the world. This thread was about the LONDON mayor and what he said and I have commented on the LONDON terrorist attacks since I have been living here
You are welcome to start a comment or a thread on terrorist attacks in the last 100/1,000 years all over the world. But don't ask me about those as those don't affect me and I have NOT commented about those
Some folk are so thick .....
People aren't think... you are trying to narrow it down to small subsections to prove a point...
I was around for Canary Wharf? Were you? Should I hate on Irish people the way you hate on muslims
You can hate anyone you like. It is none of my business
I just hate terrorists and it does not matter to me if they are muslim, green brown or black. Got it?
Not white then
If they were White and in London and in the time I have been here so that it affects me, then yes
So you only care about what affects you? Did yesterday's attacks directly 'affect' you? "Yes, just like yesterday's attack affected all those MPs even though they weren't killed Is your point that only those who are instantly killed by a terrorist attack are affected? Get real | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Would people on this thread report suspicious activity if it involved a muslim or would you be afraid of being called a racist? How would we know if they were a Muslim??
How would we know they weren't?
Exactly my point
But would it be 'covert racism' if a terrorist was reported in London and he or she was muslim?"No, I suggest you use google to look up the term 'covert racism' it is not difficult to do, even for you | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Sheikhyerbouti - Manchesterguy - gladiator - reading your comments clearly show we have level headed people on fab unlike some who have coverted racism in them. He has said nothing wrong in his statement, yes maybe stated the obvious but who doesn't? Theresa May did say last night... And wait on, just because he is a Muslim he is immune to terror attack? These attacks are indescriminate meaning it could be anyone from any faith or background killed/hurt. These people wish to create fear and hate - no religion tells them to do that - they do it for own agendas whatever they maybe! If Muslims believed in terrorism that would make 1.4billion walking terrorists on face of the earth... yet Muslims are the biggest victims of terrorism! So please stop with the hate, unite in OUR fight to get rid of scum like these! " In a nutshell | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"So the same way Jo Cox was 'protected from any terrorist attack'?
I am commenting about the London terrorist attacks in the last decade or so. Joe Cox was in London? If not, then why are you commenting on my comments and asking about her?
Any threat to the wellbeing of Sadiq Khan, or any other MP, terrorist related or not, is not limited to vicinity of London.
As we have identified, terrorist attacks in the UK within the last decade or two, is also not limited to London.
Oh ffs; I really do need a face palm emoticon here
I am not talking about terrorist attacks any where else in the world. This thread was about the LONDON mayor and what he said and I have commented on the LONDON terrorist attacks since I have been living here
You are welcome to start a comment or a thread on terrorist attacks in the last 100/1,000 years all over the world. But don't ask me about those as those don't affect me and I have NOT commented about those
Some folk are so thick .....
People aren't think... you are trying to narrow it down to small subsections to prove a point...
I was around for Canary Wharf? Were you? Should I hate on Irish people the way you hate on muslims
You can hate anyone you like. It is none of my business
I just hate terrorists and it does not matter to me if they are muslim, green brown or black. Got it?
Not white then
If they were White and in London and in the time I have been here so that it affects me, then yes
So you only care about what affects you? Did yesterday's attacks directly 'affect' you?
Yes, just like yesterday's attack affected all those MPs even though they weren't killed
Is your point that only those who are instantly killed by a terrorist attack are affected? Get real"I was asking a question? Not making a point | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Would people on this thread report suspicious activity if it involved a muslim or would you be afraid of being called a racist? No they wouldnt dare to, cos of political correctness, sharia law is taking over." Sharia Law is taking over? Where? Examples? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Would people on this thread report suspicious activity if it involved a muslim or would you be afraid of being called a racist? How would we know if they were a Muslim??
How would we know they weren't?
Exactly my point
But would it be 'covert racism' if a terrorist was reported in London and he or she was muslim?
No, I suggest you use google to look up the term 'covert racism' it is not difficult to do, even for you "I did. And I also read your comments on this and other threads You always mention 'covert racism' when it comes to muslims or asian people. It is your 'weapon' to silence anyone on forums who you do not agree with | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Would people on this thread report suspicious activity if it involved a muslim or would you be afraid of being called a racist? How would we know if they were a Muslim??
How would we know they weren't?
Exactly my point
So you wouldn't report suspicious activity just in case. Fair enough"I would report any suspicious activity, my point was , how would I know if they were Muslim? And why would that be relevant ? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Would people on this thread report suspicious activity if it involved a muslim or would you be afraid of being called a racist? No they wouldnt dare to, cos of political correctness, sharia law is taking over. Sharia Law is taking over? Where? Examples? " It is a problem in a lot of prisons | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"So the same way Jo Cox was 'protected from any terrorist attack'?
I am commenting about the London terrorist attacks in the last decade or so. Joe Cox was in London? If not, then why are you commenting on my comments and asking about her?
Any threat to the wellbeing of Sadiq Khan, or any other MP, terrorist related or not, is not limited to vicinity of London.
As we have identified, terrorist attacks in the UK within the last decade or two, is also not limited to London.
Oh ffs; I really do need a face palm emoticon here
I am not talking about terrorist attacks any where else in the world. This thread was about the LONDON mayor and what he said and I have commented on the LONDON terrorist attacks since I have been living here
You are welcome to start a comment or a thread on terrorist attacks in the last 100/1,000 years all over the world. But don't ask me about those as those don't affect me and I have NOT commented about those
Some folk are so thick .....
People aren't think... you are trying to narrow it down to small subsections to prove a point...
I was around for Canary Wharf? Were you? Should I hate on Irish people the way you hate on muslims
You can hate anyone you like. It is none of my business
I just hate terrorists and it does not matter to me if they are muslim, green brown or black. Got it?
Not white then
If they were White and in London and in the time I have been here so that it affects me, then yes
So you only care about what affects you? Did yesterday's attacks directly 'affect' you?
Yes, just like yesterday's attack affected all those MPs even though they weren't killed
Is your point that only those who are instantly killed by a terrorist attack are affected? Get real
I was asking a question? Not making a point "Was it a serious question? I hope not | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Would people on this thread report suspicious activity if it involved a muslim or would you be afraid of being called a racist? No they wouldnt dare to, cos of political correctness, sharia law is taking over. Sharia Law is taking over? Where? Examples? " Whole of sweden is a good example. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Would people on this thread report suspicious activity if it involved a muslim or would you be afraid of being called a racist? How would we know if they were a Muslim??
How would we know they weren't?
Exactly my point
So you wouldn't report suspicious activity just in case. Fair enough
I would report any suspicious activity, my point was , how would I know if they were Muslim? And why would that be relevant ? "It is relevant because of people like you who shout 'covert racism' anytime a muslim or an asian person is involved | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Would people on this thread report suspicious activity if it involved a muslim or would you be afraid of being called a racist? How would we know if they were a Muslim??
How would we know they weren't?
Exactly my point
But would it be 'covert racism' if a terrorist was reported in London and he or she was muslim?
No, I suggest you use google to look up the term 'covert racism' it is not difficult to do, even for you
I did. And I also read your comments on this and other threads
You always mention 'covert racism' when it comes to muslims or asian people. It is your 'weapon' to silence anyone on forums who you do not agree with"Not at all, I mentioned covert racism once and my comments on previous threads are irrelevant to this one. Yoy come across as very angry, hate breeds hate, you state that you 'hate' these terrorists? This is exactly the reaction they won't . 'Some people are so thick ' | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Would people on this thread report suspicious activity if it involved a muslim or would you be afraid of being called a racist? How would we know if they were a Muslim??
How would we know they weren't?
Exactly my point
So you wouldn't report suspicious activity just in case. Fair enough
I would report any suspicious activity, my point was , how would I know if they were Muslim? And why would that be relevant ?
It is relevant because of people like you who shout 'covert racism' anytime a muslim or an asian person is involved"I said some of these the comments on here showed 'covert racism' , can you show me where I have used the term elsewhere ? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Would people on this thread report suspicious activity if it involved a muslim or would you be afraid of being called a racist? No they wouldnt dare to, cos of political correctness, sharia law is taking over. Sharia Law is taking over? Where? Examples? It is a problem in a lot of prisons" Conversion to Islam (usually conveniently, for protection) is a problem in prisons, as is radicalisation, given that the prison system is seen as unjust, so prisoners are easy targets for any kind of radicalisation, not just Muslim. However, I've yet to hear of a Sharia Court in any of the prisons I've studied or visited! You know they can only legally deal with civil cases in the UK, don't you? And they don't supersede English and Welsh law. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Would people on this thread report suspicious activity if it involved a muslim or would you be afraid of being called a racist? How would we know if they were a Muslim??
How would we know they weren't?
Exactly my point
But would it be 'covert racism' if a terrorist was reported in London and he or she was muslim?
No, I suggest you use google to look up the term 'covert racism' it is not difficult to do, even for you
I did. And I also read your comments on this and other threads
You always mention 'covert racism' when it comes to muslims or asian people. It is your 'weapon' to silence anyone on forums who you do not agree with
Not at all, I mentioned covert racism once and my comments on previous threads are irrelevant to this one. Yoy come across as very angry, hate breeds hate, you state that you 'hate' these terrorists? This is exactly the reaction they won't .
'Some people are so thick ' "You come across as someone who wants everyone to stick their head in the sand and not state reality Yes, I am angry at these terrorists. Anyone in their right mind would be angry at people who kill innocent people. But you will tell everyone that it is 'covert racism' to be angry at them because they happen to be muslim | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Would people on this thread report suspicious activity if it involved a muslim or would you be afraid of being called a racist? How would we know if they were a Muslim??
How would we know they weren't?
Exactly my point
But would it be 'covert racism' if a terrorist was reported in London and he or she was muslim?
No, I suggest you use google to look up the term 'covert racism' it is not difficult to do, even for you
I did. And I also read your comments on this and other threads
You always mention 'covert racism' when it comes to muslims or asian people. It is your 'weapon' to silence anyone on forums who you do not agree with
Not at all, I mentioned covert racism once and my comments on previous threads are irrelevant to this one. Yoy come across as very angry, hate breeds hate, you state that you 'hate' these terrorists? This is exactly the reaction they won't .
'Some people are so thick '
You come across as someone who wants everyone to stick their head in the sand and not state reality
Yes, I am angry at these terrorists. Anyone in their right mind would be angry at people who kill innocent people. But you will tell everyone that it is 'covert racism' to be angry at them because they happen to be muslim"I was only quoting your previous reply. Keep getting angry, keep hating, keep blaming Muslims, keep playing into the terrorists hands. Why is it relevant that the terrorist yesterday was Muslim? Why does it matter? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
""Terror attacks are part and parcel of living in a big city" " Well that escalated quickly... As far as I'm concerned being vigilant against the risk of terrorist attack has been part and parcel of my working life in London over the last 30 years. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
Although I don't expect that will cause him sleepless nights | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
""Terror attacks are part and parcel of living in a big city" Well that escalated quickly... As far as I'm concerned being vigilant against the risk of terrorist attack has been part and parcel of my working life in London over the last 30 years. " Shhh, you will get accused of stating the obvious | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
""Terror attacks are part and parcel of living in a big city" Well that escalated quickly... As far as I'm concerned being vigilant against the risk of terrorist attack has been part and parcel of my working life in London over the last 30 years. " Me too. What khan said was, as someone has already said, just a statement of the bleeding obvious. I fail to see why anyone has a problem with it. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) | |||
| Reply privately |
| back to top |  |
