Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to The Lounge |
| Jump to newest |  |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"maybe promote that womens services are more than sexual services also. they are breast cancer screenings, diabetes checks and all kinds of stuff that people need." They've done this. They've tried to explain the importance of non-abortion related services to women's health. It hasn't made a difference. Conservatives argue that money shouldn't go to organizations that support abortion in any way, regardless of other services provided (to both women and men). Texas has been passing some outrageous anti-abortion bills. I think the futility of the opposition has resulted in this satirical attempt at dialogue. I actually think it's pretty funny. If you read the promotional material it uses the exact language used for women seeking abortions - and it makes the point in a way that brings attention to the issue. I believe abortion rights will be in the Supreme Court sometime in the next 8 years in the U.S. People need to draw attention to it now, or watch those rights errode even further. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"maybe promote that womens services are more than sexual services also. they are breast cancer screenings, diabetes checks and all kinds of stuff that people need. They've done this. They've tried to explain the importance of non-abortion related services to women's health. It hasn't made a difference. Conservatives argue that money shouldn't go to organizations that support abortion in any way, regardless of other services provided (to both women and men). Texas has been passing some outrageous anti-abortion bills. I think the futility of the opposition has resulted in this satirical attempt at dialogue. I actually think it's pretty funny. If you read the promotional material it uses the exact language used for women seeking abortions - and it makes the point in a way that brings attention to the issue. I believe abortion rights will be in the Supreme Court sometime in the next 8 years in the U.S. People need to draw attention to it now, or watch those rights errode even further." sorry, i meant the media should do this more often. maybe in the headline also. i'm pretty sure the governements know this already but the general public do not. i kind of feel like anti-abortionists/anti-contraceptives won't support the services because they also provde these services but i'm sure more of the general public would support them...actually, maybe most of america is anti-abortion and contraception? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"maybe promote that womens services are more than sexual services also. they are breast cancer screenings, diabetes checks and all kinds of stuff that people need. They've done this. They've tried to explain the importance of non-abortion related services to women's health. It hasn't made a difference. Conservatives argue that money shouldn't go to organizations that support abortion in any way, regardless of other services provided (to both women and men). Texas has been passing some outrageous anti-abortion bills. I think the futility of the opposition has resulted in this satirical attempt at dialogue. I actually think it's pretty funny. If you read the promotional material it uses the exact language used for women seeking abortions - and it makes the point in a way that brings attention to the issue. I believe abortion rights will be in the Supreme Court sometime in the next 8 years in the U.S. People need to draw attention to it now, or watch those rights errode even further. sorry, i meant the media should do this more often. maybe in the headline also. i'm pretty sure the governements know this already but the general public do not. i kind of feel like anti-abortionists/anti-contraceptives won't support the services because they also provde these services but i'm sure more of the general public would support them...actually, maybe most of america is anti-abortion and contraception?" What I'm saying is that the media in the U.S. do give information on the non-abortion related services for women's health. Thats the point - the sharing of that information has not changed people's minds. When talking about abortion rights in the U.S., you cant talk about what "Americans" think. Its more complicated than that. It is very regional - this is a political issue where differed states have very different opinions. Texas has some of the most restrictive abortion laws in the whole of the U.S. - mostly for religious reasons. I could post them here, but I don't want to make the thread too policy oriented. My point is just that this satirical law comes out of frustration because educating people on the importance of services to women's health and access to abortions has come to nothing in places like Texas. Abortion has been deemed a right by the Supreme Court in Roe v. - Wade. In the Webster and Casey decisions that right was severely restricted, but still existed. Texas politicians have been pushing the boundaries of federal law with their recent legislation. They are pushing for abortion to go to the Supreme Court again once Trump nominates his justice to the court because they want an explicit overruling of Roe v Wade. I see this satirical law as an attempt to bring attention to an issue that many liberal states aren't necessarily paying attention to because abortion rights aren't under attack in the same way in all states. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Lol, and how are they going to know. "Well,you just know.That's all. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"maybe promote that womens services are more than sexual services also. they are breast cancer screenings, diabetes checks and all kinds of stuff that people need. They've done this. They've tried to explain the importance of non-abortion related services to women's health. It hasn't made a difference. Conservatives argue that money shouldn't go to organizations that support abortion in any way, regardless of other services provided (to both women and men). Texas has been passing some outrageous anti-abortion bills. I think the futility of the opposition has resulted in this satirical attempt at dialogue. I actually think it's pretty funny. If you read the promotional material it uses the exact language used for women seeking abortions - and it makes the point in a way that brings attention to the issue. I believe abortion rights will be in the Supreme Court sometime in the next 8 years in the U.S. People need to draw attention to it now, or watch those rights errode even further. sorry, i meant the media should do this more often. maybe in the headline also. i'm pretty sure the governements know this already but the general public do not. i kind of feel like anti-abortionists/anti-contraceptives won't support the services because they also provde these services but i'm sure more of the general public would support them...actually, maybe most of america is anti-abortion and contraception? What I'm saying is that the media in the U.S. do give information on the non-abortion related services for women's health. Thats the point - the sharing of that information has not changed people's minds. When talking about abortion rights in the U.S., you cant talk about what "Americans" think. Its more complicated than that. It is very regional - this is a political issue where differed states have very different opinions. Texas has some of the most restrictive abortion laws in the whole of the U.S. - mostly for religious reasons. I could post them here, but I don't want to make the thread too policy oriented. My point is just that this satirical law comes out of frustration because educating people on the importance of services to women's health and access to abortions has come to nothing in places like Texas. Abortion has been deemed a right by the Supreme Court in Roe v. - Wade. In the Webster and Casey decisions that right was severely restricted, but still existed. Texas politicians have been pushing the boundaries of federal law with their recent legislation. They are pushing for abortion to go to the Supreme Court again once Trump nominates his justice to the court because they want an explicit overruling of Roe v Wade. I see this satirical law as an attempt to bring attention to an issue that many liberal states aren't necessarily paying attention to because abortion rights aren't under attack in the same way in all states." oh right, thanks for explaining that to me. hope it works, americans seem so liberal mostly i don't get why women aren't supported so much there, or the poor. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"maybe promote that womens services are more than sexual services also. they are breast cancer screenings, diabetes checks and all kinds of stuff that people need. They've done this. They've tried to explain the importance of non-abortion related services to women's health. It hasn't made a difference. Conservatives argue that money shouldn't go to organizations that support abortion in any way, regardless of other services provided (to both women and men). Texas has been passing some outrageous anti-abortion bills. I think the futility of the opposition has resulted in this satirical attempt at dialogue. I actually think it's pretty funny. If you read the promotional material it uses the exact language used for women seeking abortions - and it makes the point in a way that brings attention to the issue. I believe abortion rights will be in the Supreme Court sometime in the next 8 years in the U.S. People need to draw attention to it now, or watch those rights errode even further. sorry, i meant the media should do this more often. maybe in the headline also. i'm pretty sure the governements know this already but the general public do not. i kind of feel like anti-abortionists/anti-contraceptives won't support the services because they also provde these services but i'm sure more of the general public would support them...actually, maybe most of america is anti-abortion and contraception? What I'm saying is that the media in the U.S. do give information on the non-abortion related services for women's health. Thats the point - the sharing of that information has not changed people's minds. When talking about abortion rights in the U.S., you cant talk about what "Americans" think. Its more complicated than that. It is very regional - this is a political issue where differed states have very different opinions. Texas has some of the most restrictive abortion laws in the whole of the U.S. - mostly for religious reasons. I could post them here, but I don't want to make the thread too policy oriented. My point is just that this satirical law comes out of frustration because educating people on the importance of services to women's health and access to abortions has come to nothing in places like Texas. Abortion has been deemed a right by the Supreme Court in Roe v. - Wade. In the Webster and Casey decisions that right was severely restricted, but still existed. Texas politicians have been pushing the boundaries of federal law with their recent legislation. They are pushing for abortion to go to the Supreme Court again once Trump nominates his justice to the court because they want an explicit overruling of Roe v Wade. I see this satirical law as an attempt to bring attention to an issue that many liberal states aren't necessarily paying attention to because abortion rights aren't under attack in the same way in all states." 
We're beginning to see more of the American (Texas sort) tactics being used at clinics here, with some parts of the press questioning the availability of abortion.
I have also heard from women who are finding they are being 'rationed' for services around the menopause, being told that their symptoms need to get worse before they can be referred.
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
