Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've noticed a lot more of the Neanderthal man style messages of late. They usually only contain a few words that make no sense.. Does this tactic work?. Also if I messaged you with a "suck u now" would you? they would deny it on here but I bet they would seriously think about it " I'm not denying it - I would seriously think about it Is it not the norm to get messages typed with fists? I get the impression most blokes on here are very lazy. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think we should do an experiment... pick a man, send the 'suck you now' message and see what the response is. " Oh lets all message the same one for fun | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think we should do an experiment... pick a man, send the 'suck you now' message and see what the response is. " I got one earlier. Now blocked. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've noticed a lot more of the Neanderthal man style messages of late. They usually only contain a few words that make no sense.. Does this tactic work?. Also if I messaged you with a "suck u now" would you? " Yep | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've noticed a lot more of the Neanderthal man style messages of late. They usually only contain a few words that make no sense.. Does this tactic work?. Also if I messaged you with a "suck u now" would you? they would deny it on here but I bet they would seriously think about it " Would work for both of you lol | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think we should do an experiment... pick a man, send the 'suck you now' message and see what the response is. " I'm down for that... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think we should do an experiment... pick a man, send the 'suck you now' message and see what the response is. " But do we actually have to go through with it? I'd have to put make up and proper clothes. And wash. Fuck it, I can't be arsed. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think we should do an experiment... pick a man, send the 'suck you now' message and see what the response is. But do we actually have to go through with it? I'd have to put make up and proper clothes. And wash. Fuck it, I can't be arsed." God no.. in line with the many insults I'm fussy and a time waster anyway! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think we should do an experiment... pick a man, send the 'suck you now' message and see what the response is. But do we actually have to go through with it? I'd have to put make up and proper clothes. And wash. Fuck it, I can't be arsed. God no.. in line with the many insults I'm fussy and a time waster anyway! " Phew. Ok I'm in | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've noticed a lot more of the Neanderthal man style messages of late. They usually only contain a few words that make no sense.. Does this tactic work?. Also if I messaged you with a "suck u now" would you? " I've been very polite in my profile.. Making lots of friends which is OK as I'm fairly new but plenty of deletes too without even a no!.. I Suppose a lot of men may think the knuckle dragging that is the way to go.. And maybe some women like that. Eeeer... Yes? 99% would.. The other 1% are kidding themselves. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've noticed a lot more of the Neanderthal man style messages of late. They usually only contain a few words that make no sense.. Does this tactic work?. Also if I messaged you with a "suck u now" would you? they would deny it on here but I bet they would seriously think about it I'm not denying it - I would seriously think about it Is it not the norm to get messages typed with fists? I get the impression most blokes on here are very lazy." I think many are not just the blokes... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think we should do an experiment... pick a man, send the 'suck you now' message and see what the response is. " Good idea, I'll do Lib. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've had three positive responses, one 'you're having a laugh' type of comment and one that I can't decipher 'cause they are too much of an enigma. So judging by that response, it works on some men." Oooh good work! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think we should do an experiment... pick a man, send the 'suck you now' message and see what the response is. But do we actually have to go through with it? I'd have to put make up and proper clothes. And wash. Fuck it, I can't be arsed. God no.. in line with the many insults I'm fussy and a time waster anyway! " I'm on it! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think we should do an experiment... pick a man, send the 'suck you now' message and see what the response is. But do we actually have to go through with it? I'd have to put make up and proper clothes. And wash. Fuck it, I can't be arsed." Yeah and I ate too much at dinner so now I have a food baby. I'm not looking so hot! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It worked, Lib. said yes " Like he was ever gonna say no!! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It worked, Lib. said yes Like he was ever gonna say no!! " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It'd depend who it was from. If it was someone I'd spoken to or someone who had a veri from someone I know, then I'd consider it. From some random, probably not." Suck you now? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've noticed a lot more of the Neanderthal man style messages of late. They usually only contain a few words that make no sense.. Does this tactic work?. Also if I messaged you with a "suck u now" would you? " If you lived close enough and could accommodate...yes. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As a Welsh man I find the English language so very beautiful. People should embrace and enjoy words Messages should be thought out and well written " Taff, Taff! wherefore art thou Taff suck you now, Is that any better ? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As a Welsh man I find the English language so very beautiful. People should embrace and enjoy words Messages should be thought out and well written Taff, Taff! wherefore art thou Taff suck you now, Is that any better ? " Chuck a pretty please with a cherry on top and you're onto a winner! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm thinking that really this needs to be more rewarding for us women. May I suggest fu**ing, licking fingering or just kissing me now? " Suggest away. I think you already know my answer to that. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It'd depend who it was from. If it was someone I'd spoken to or someone who had a veri from someone I know, then I'd consider it. From some random, probably not. Suck you now?" I'm washing my hair.... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It'd depend who it was from. If it was someone I'd spoken to or someone who had a veri from someone I know, then I'd consider it. From some random, probably not. Suck you now? I'm washing my hair.... " I'll not offer again | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It'd depend who it was from. If it was someone I'd spoken to or someone who had a veri from someone I know, then I'd consider it. From some random, probably not. Suck you now? I'm washing my hair.... I'll not offer again" You say that now. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It'd depend who it was from. If it was someone I'd spoken to or someone who had a veri from someone I know, then I'd consider it. From some random, probably not. Suck you now? I'm washing my hair.... I'll not offer again You say that now." It's here, in writing | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It'd depend who it was from. If it was someone I'd spoken to or someone who had a veri from someone I know, then I'd consider it. From some random, probably not. Suck you now? I'm washing my hair.... I'll offer again and again You say that now. It's here, in writing " So I see. Now who changed that.... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It'd depend who it was from. If it was someone I'd spoken to or someone who had a veri from someone I know, then I'd consider it. From some random, probably not. Suck you now? I'm washing my hair.... I'll offer again and again You say that now. It's here, in writing So I see. Now who changed that.... " You bugger | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm going to have to start a timewaster thread in a minute." You haven't got one yet? I've had three bjs already tonight from this thread | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm going to have to start a timewaster thread in a minute." I didn't mean I'd do it tonight | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm going to have to start a timewaster thread in a minute. You haven't got one yet? I've had three bjs already tonight from this thread " Shhhh! You said you wouldn't tell or they'd all want one | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I get the really long winded fancy a fuck now messages, makes me laugh if nothing else. They go along the lines of: "Hey Ms V, i'm currently sat here with my cock out beating away at myself and i noticed you were online. I appreciate you live 250 miles away but hey if you ever fancy climbing on top of my rock hard cock, give me a shout" " How are you not practically running to him?? I assume he also told you in detail what he would do and how you would absolutely love every moment ... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm going to have to start a timewaster thread in a minute. You haven't got one yet? I've had three bjs already tonight from this thread Shhhh! You said you wouldn't tell or they'd all want one " It was you. I didn't want you to fucking tell me. Why do you think I was blindfolded . Just can't get the level of service these days | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It'd depend who it was from. If it was someone I'd spoken to or someone who had a veri from someone I know, then I'd consider it. From some random, probably not. Suck you now? I'm washing my hair.... I'll offer again and again You say that now. It's here, in writing So I see. Now who changed that.... You bugger " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Hang about are we discussing private mail here? " Snitches get stitches. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I get the really long winded fancy a fuck now messages, makes me laugh if nothing else. They go along the lines of: "Hey Ms V, i'm currently sat here with my cock out beating away at myself and i noticed you were online. I appreciate you live 250 miles away but hey if you ever fancy climbing on top of my rock hard cock, give me a shout" How are you not practically running to him?? I assume he also told you in detail what he would do and how you would absolutely love every moment ... " yep he did!! I had to hold myself back, i was that tempted | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm going to have to start a timewaster thread in a minute. You haven't got one yet? I've had three bjs already tonight from this thread Shhhh! You said you wouldn't tell or they'd all want one It was you. I didn't want you to fucking tell me. Why do you think I was blindfolded . Just can't get the level of service these days " Shit, and I did such a good job of putting on a manly voice too! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm going to have to start a timewaster thread in a minute. You haven't got one yet? I've had three bjs already tonight from this thread Shhhh! You said you wouldn't tell or they'd all want one It was you. I didn't want you to fucking tell me. Why do you think I was blindfolded . Just can't get the level of service these days Shit, and I did such a good job of putting on a manly voice too!" Blew it | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I have sent this type of message, but only as a continuation of other playful messages, thankfully she said yes. Would I if received such a message as a first point of contact, no. " Shame.. fancy a.... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Hang about are we discussing private mail here? " Paraphrasing and it might actually get me some action | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've noticed a lot more of the Neanderthal man style messages of late. They usually only contain a few words that make no sense.. Does this tactic work?. Also if I messaged you with a "suck u now" would you? " haha... very fare point... x | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think we should do an experiment... pick a man, send the 'suck you now' message and see what the response is. Oh lets all message the same one for fun " haha... very funny ladies... that's where all my messages came from... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've had three positive responses, one 'you're having a laugh' type of comment and one that I can't decipher 'cause they are too much of an enigma. So judging by that response, it works on some men." Try me. I wonder what I'd say. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've had three positive responses, one 'you're having a laugh' type of comment and one that I can't decipher 'cause they are too much of an enigma. So judging by that response, it works on some men. Try me. I wonder what I'd say. " When I next have ten minutes spare I will. That should be enough time for it all, shouldn't it? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've had three positive responses, one 'you're having a laugh' type of comment and one that I can't decipher 'cause they are too much of an enigma. So judging by that response, it works on some men. Try me. I wonder what I'd say. When I next have ten minutes spare I will. That should be enough time for it all, shouldn't it? " Ten minutes? All I needed was a few words. Bit too late in the night for me to read a small narrative. But, the thought itself has me weak at the knees. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You could try the can I suck you now ... Don't forget to send a vag picture..you know you ladies need to make more of an effort. " Mine resembles a ripped out fireplace but perhaps thats what men want?? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've noticed a lot more of the Neanderthal man style messages of late. They usually only contain a few words that make no sense.. Does this tactic work?. Also if I messaged you with a "suck u now" would you? " I don't send explicit or crude messages. However, I think I tend to go too far with the vanilla politeness and people get a bit bored. The person I'm messaging would have to start the naughtiness because I'm rubbish at picking up signals. If I got a 'suck you now' I would think it was too good to be true and if from a 'stranger' would think it was a 'fake' | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've noticed a lot more of the Neanderthal man style messages of late. They usually only contain a few words that make no sense.. Does this tactic work?. Also if I messaged you with a "suck u now" would you? " I've never sent a 'fuck now?' type of message, but the amount of times a well-crafted (in my opinion) personal message is read, and either ignored or straight delete, you do begin to wonder why you bother trying too hard Would I respond to a 'suck you now'? Don't know | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As a Welsh man I find the English language so very beautiful. People should embrace and enjoy words Messages should be thought out and well written " Can be well-read and still enjoy using expletives I know I do | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've noticed a lot more of the Neanderthal man style messages of late. They usually only contain a few words that make no sense.. Does this tactic work?. Also if I messaged you with a "suck u now" would you? " To be fair to the Neanderthals, they were a very eloquent and demonstrative lot. I think the sect of males you are referring to are those whose experience on here has led them to think that quantity has more value than quality. Like those who rant endlessly about having messages ignored and how this is just awful, short curt messages are just part of being on this site. Ignore them, react to them, do what you will, but if you don't value or like them, it is best to just ignore them and move on. Better for you and saves clogging the forums up with the same shite day-in day-out. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Oh I don't know I think this thread has provided a few giggles " It has. And I'll be sucking off someone soon hopefully as a result of this thread so I really don't think it's a typical moaning one. Thanks OP for helping me practise my oral skills. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Oh I don't know I think this thread has provided a few giggles It has. And I'll be sucking off someone soon hopefully as a result of this thread so I really don't think it's a typical moaning one. Thanks OP for helping me practise my oral skills." Yay!! Enjoy x | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Oh I don't know I think this thread has provided a few giggles " Lol, a fair point. I do enjoy how very few people are ever guilty of what is offered up as anathema. In fact they are usually violently against it and willing to offer themselves up as the shining (knight) example of just how amazing [insert chosen group here] actually are. Obviously with no ulterior motive. Obviously. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As a Welsh man I find the English language so very beautiful. People should embrace and enjoy words Messages should be thought out and well written Can be well-read and still enjoy using expletives I know I do " I do love a well timed expletive | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"[Expletive removed by poster due to poor timing at 08/01/17 00:34:18]" | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"[Expletive removed by poster due to poor timing at 08/01/17 00:34:18]" Fuckpig | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"[Expletive removed by poster due to poor timing at 08/01/17 00:34:18]" | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"[Expletive removed by poster due to poor timing at 08/01/17 00:34:18] Fuckpig" *snorting and squealing heard from miles away * | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've noticed a lot more of the Neanderthal man style messages of late. They usually only contain a few words that make no sense.. Does this tactic work?. Also if I messaged you with a "suck u now" would you? I don't need to think. Yes! they would deny it on here but I bet they would seriously think about it " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've noticed a lot more of the Neanderthal man style messages of late. They usually only contain a few words that make no sense.. Does this tactic work?. Also if I messaged you with a "suck u now" would you? " Can't say I've tried the neanderthal messages, but can't imagine they would work If YOU sent me that, I'd certainly struggle to say no ha ha | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've noticed a lot more of the Neanderthal man style messages of late. They usually only contain a few words that make no sense.. Does this tactic work?. Also if I messaged you with a "suck u now" would you? " Yeah I'm getting more and more like this. Apparently because most messages are deleted they don't feel the need to send a detailed message. I've sent one of "I need my pussy licked " and he's appeared but tbf we had met previously and chat quite a bit on here. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Hang about are we discussing private mail here? Paraphrasing and it might actually get me some action " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I once left someone a veri that simply said 'Ug'! Does that count as neanderthal and manly? " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think we should do an experiment... pick a man, send the 'suck you now' message and see what the response is. " He would think it was Christmas all over again.....and I think you all know what the response would be x | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've noticed a lot more of the Neanderthal man style messages of late. They usually only contain a few words that make no sense.. Does this tactic work?. Also if I messaged you with a "suck u now" would you? " I get messages like this from ladies (occasionally - probably fake) and couples (where there seems to be an expectation that I'd love to do something with/to the female half simply because I'm a man) and men. I just delete them. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've noticed a lot more of the Neanderthal man style messages of late. They usually only contain a few words that make no sense.. Does this tactic work?. Also if I messaged you with a "suck u now" would you? " Does it work? Depends if there is a full moon! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"TBH, this is nothing new and is a symptom of the dichotomy that is the effort / reward dynamic. The majority don't want one liner messages, but also reserve the right to 'Instadelete' someones (and lets assume here) message that they have put some considered thought into. Now imagine you've done this 50 times, each time you get deleted (sometimes blocked as well) and you start to slide down the slope toward shorter, quicker messages (because there is no reward to writing a longer one) and so on and so forth. Eventually, it just gets to the one liner stage. Now, before the 'Delete and Block' brigade get out the torches and pitchforks to defend their right to do so, I'm not saying its wrong - I'm saying that perhaps (some) of the lazy messaging is, at least in part, due to this." Totally agree And this is the perfect reason behind making this a full 'pay only' site; overnight all the fakers and time wasters would disappear, leaving only genuine people as members, which in turn would make everyone's inbox far less busy, giving all those single females and couples much more time to read well-crafted messages | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think we should do an experiment... pick a man, send the 'suck you now' message and see what the response is. He would think it was Christmas all over again.....and I think you all know what the response would be x" And in your case; we need the option of a filter to include CD/TV , as you aren't classed as 'single men' when it comes to mail preferences. For those who don't know what you meant by 'we all know what the response would be' , it means you would be blocked | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"TBH, this is nothing new and is a symptom of the dichotomy that is the effort / reward dynamic. The majority don't want one liner messages, but also reserve the right to 'Instadelete' someones (and lets assume here) message that they have put some considered thought into. Now imagine you've done this 50 times, each time you get deleted (sometimes blocked as well) and you start to slide down the slope toward shorter, quicker messages (because there is no reward to writing a longer one) and so on and so forth. Eventually, it just gets to the one liner stage. Now, before the 'Delete and Block' brigade get out the torches and pitchforks to defend their right to do so, I'm not saying its wrong - I'm saying that perhaps (some) of the lazy messaging is, at least in part, due to this. Totally agree And this is the perfect reason behind making this a full 'pay only' site; overnight all the fakers and time wasters would disappear, leaving only genuine people as members, which in turn would make everyone's inbox far less busy, giving all those single females and couples much more time to read well-crafted messages " Have you ever used a site where people have to pay? I've used one in the past where men had to pay and it was absolutely riven with fakers and time wasters, as well as fake female profiles designed to extract more money from the men. There were far more fakes than on this site. If fakes and time wasters would disappear if they had to pay, then stop messages from everyone who isn't a site supporter and you'll not be troubled by them. If I received fewer messages it still wouldn't make me fancy people I don't currently fancy. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've had three positive responses, one 'you're having a laugh' type of comment and one that I can't decipher 'cause they are too much of an enigma. So judging by that response, it works on some men." Was that random men or people on your friends list.. I think it makes a difference who you send it to | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've had three positive responses, one 'you're having a laugh' type of comment and one that I can't decipher 'cause they are too much of an enigma. So judging by that response, it works on some men. Was that random men or people on your friends list.. I think it makes a difference who you send it to " Random men and one hotlisteej... but thanks for the acknowledgement of my desirability. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"TBH, this is nothing new and is a symptom of the dichotomy that is the effort / reward dynamic. The majority don't want one liner messages, but also reserve the right to 'Instadelete' someones (and lets assume here) message that they have put some considered thought into. Now imagine you've done this 50 times, each time you get deleted (sometimes blocked as well) and you start to slide down the slope toward shorter, quicker messages (because there is no reward to writing a longer one) and so on and so forth. Eventually, it just gets to the one liner stage. Now, before the 'Delete and Block' brigade get out the torches and pitchforks to defend their right to do so, I'm not saying its wrong - I'm saying that perhaps (some) of the lazy messaging is, at least in part, due to this. Totally agree And this is the perfect reason behind making this a full 'pay only' site; overnight all the fakers and time wasters would disappear, leaving only genuine people as members, which in turn would make everyone's inbox far less busy, giving all those single females and couples much more time to read well-crafted messages Have you ever used a site where people have to pay? I've used one in the past where men had to pay and it was absolutely riven with fakers and time wasters, as well as fake female profiles designed to extract more money from the men. There were far more fakes than on this site. If fakes and time wasters would disappear if they had to pay, then stop messages from everyone who isn't a site supporter and you'll not be troubled by them. If I received fewer messages it still wouldn't make me fancy people I don't currently fancy." I used a full pay site last year, and had 4 successful meets in 3 months, and still see a woman from there now. Private message me if you like, and we can see whether it was the same site? The point I was trying to make about receiving fewer messages is, that you were more likely to give more time to genuine people, as I know how some women get to the 'sod it, bulk delete and start again' stage | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"TBH, this is nothing new and is a symptom of the dichotomy that is the effort / reward dynamic. The majority don't want one liner messages, but also reserve the right to 'Instadelete' someones (and lets assume here) message that they have put some considered thought into. Now imagine you've done this 50 times, each time you get deleted (sometimes blocked as well) and you start to slide down the slope toward shorter, quicker messages (because there is no reward to writing a longer one) and so on and so forth. Eventually, it just gets to the one liner stage. Now, before the 'Delete and Block' brigade get out the torches and pitchforks to defend their right to do so, I'm not saying its wrong - I'm saying that perhaps (some) of the lazy messaging is, at least in part, due to this. Totally agree And this is the perfect reason behind making this a full 'pay only' site; overnight all the fakers and time wasters would disappear, leaving only genuine people as members, which in turn would make everyone's inbox far less busy, giving all those single females and couples much more time to read well-crafted messages Have you ever used a site where people have to pay? I've used one in the past where men had to pay and it was absolutely riven with fakers and time wasters, as well as fake female profiles designed to extract more money from the men. There were far more fakes than on this site. If fakes and time wasters would disappear if they had to pay, then stop messages from everyone who isn't a site supporter and you'll not be troubled by them. If I received fewer messages it still wouldn't make me fancy people I don't currently fancy. I used a full pay site last year, and had 4 successful meets in 3 months, and still see a woman from there now. Private message me if you like, and we can see whether it was the same site? The point I was trying to make about receiving fewer messages is, that you were more likely to give more time to genuine people, as I know how some women get to the 'sod it, bulk delete and start again' stage " No it probably wasn't. I don't know about other women but I don't get many messages (filters) so if I don't want to reply to someone it's because I don't want to reply, regardless of what's in my inbox. It doesn't matter if they're "genuine" or not, if I can't be arsed then I can't be arsed. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"TBH, this is nothing new and is a symptom of the dichotomy that is the effort / reward dynamic. The majority don't want one liner messages, but also reserve the right to 'Instadelete' someones (and lets assume here) message that they have put some considered thought into. Now imagine you've done this 50 times, each time you get deleted (sometimes blocked as well) and you start to slide down the slope toward shorter, quicker messages (because there is no reward to writing a longer one) and so on and so forth. Eventually, it just gets to the one liner stage. Now, before the 'Delete and Block' brigade get out the torches and pitchforks to defend their right to do so, I'm not saying its wrong - I'm saying that perhaps (some) of the lazy messaging is, at least in part, due to this. Totally agree And this is the perfect reason behind making this a full 'pay only' site; overnight all the fakers and time wasters would disappear, leaving only genuine people as members, which in turn would make everyone's inbox far less busy, giving all those single females and couples much more time to read well-crafted messages " Sadly, making this a pay-only site wouldn't stop the 'fakes' - it just meas they feel they will look 'legit' because they have paid. I bet if you did a straw poll, may users on here who have suffered at the hands of fake and timewasting profiles found that the culprits were also site members. Ive yet to find the 'holy grail' solution - but a paywall isn't it. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I once left someone a veri that simply said 'Ug'! Does that count as neanderthal and manly? " You know who it is! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I once left someone a veri that simply said 'Ug'! Does that count as neanderthal and manly? You know who it is! " No idea | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |