FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

What a Wang er

Jump to newest
 

By *ushroom7 OP   Man
over a year ago

Bradford

Twitter's new European boss, Mr Tony Wang has suggested that users who break privacy injunctions by posting on the site could face the UK courts.

Tony Wang said people who did "bad things" needed to defend themselves.

Speaking at the e-G8 forum in Paris, Mr Wang said: "Platforms have a responsibility, not to defend that user but to protect that user's right to defend him or herself".

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ushroom7 OP   Man
over a year ago

Bradford

PS makes more sense with this bit added :

He warned that the site would hand over user information to the authorities where they were "legally required".

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *phroditeWoman
over a year ago

(She/ her) in Sensualityland

Why are we doing intellectually challenging stuff?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ushroom7 OP   Man
over a year ago

Bradford


"Why are we doing intellectually challenging stuff? "

Copy and paste ain't that difficult.

For anyone who has named a certain footballer on Twitter and by extension Fabswingers is at risk of details being handed over to the Court/lawyers for that footballer.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *phroditeWoman
over a year ago

(She/ her) in Sensualityland


"Why are we doing intellectually challenging stuff?

Copy and paste ain't that difficult.

For anyone who has named a certain footballer on Twitter and by extension Fabswingers is at risk of details being handed over to the Court/lawyers for that footballer.

"

I wont name you, promise

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Any UK citizen who flouts UK law should be bought to account for their actions, irrespective of how they breach our laws.

Can't understand why they should think they should get away with such actions, just because they do it in cyberspace

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ara JTV/TS
over a year ago

Bristol East

Me thinks you worry unnecessarily.

They might pursue someone who leaks court information on the internet.

But they're not interested in people who merely repeat it after that.

Those people aren't disclosing anything confidential, they're just gossiping.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Any UK citizen who flouts UK law should be bought to account for their actions, irrespective of how they breach our laws.

Can't understand why they should think they should get away with such actions, just because they do it in cyberspace "

Just on a technical point. The High Court injunction didn't and doesn't apply in Scotland. An interdict from the Court of Session would have had to have been sought and secured. It wasn't.

That's why the Sunday Herald got away with what it did and it took great pains to ensure it did nothing to circulate their 'revelations' beyond the Scottish border.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Me thinks you worry unnecessarily.

They might pursue someone who leaks court information on the internet.

But they're not interested in people who merely repeat it after that.

Those people aren't disclosing anything confidential, they're just gossiping.

"

I wouldn't be so sure.

It's unlikely to happen in this case but if a situation arose where someone broke the terms of an injunction online and another person used that information to, for example, write a book and earn a lot of money from doing that, a court might take the view that the those earnings should be forfeit.

The author wouldn't be "disclosing anything confidential" but I doubt they could use the 'I'm only passing on gossip' defence.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aucy3Couple
over a year ago

glasgow

i still think it's wayne rooney.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"i still think it's wayne rooney. "

Surely no women are that desperate

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham


"i still think it's wayne rooney.

Surely no women are that desperate "

A Liverpool prostitute has taken out a super injunction to stop people saying that she slept with Wayne Rooney

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top