Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I have read an interesting article on the guardian website thatbthe goverment are looking to introduce a bill would block access to websites that show images of non coventianal sex acts Picture and videos that leaves marks, urination, female ejaculation, as well as sex in a public place it is believed would be captured by this The bill will force isps to block content that would not be certified for commercial DVD by the BBFC This I see has a huge impact for sites like this and other sites; that host pics of people being spanked multiple digits in pussy, anus for sexual pleasure and outdoor sex pics I just wondered what people's thoughts were It is already illegal to publish many of those things in this country." the point being the amendment proposes to force ISPs to *block* sites containing material they don't deem appropriate for consenting adults to view that is published (served) from *other* countries. -Matt | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I understand there is to be a 4 fingers rule. wtf are they going to do next remove hard ons AGAIN !!" Well kitkats are out then -Matt | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I have read an interesting article on the guardian website thatbthe goverment are looking to introduce a bill would block access to websites that show images of non coventianal sex acts Picture and videos that leaves marks, urination, female ejaculation, as well as sex in a public place it is believed would be captured by this The bill will force isps to block content that would not be certified for commercial DVD by the BBFC This I see has a huge impact for sites like this and other sites; that host pics of people being spanked multiple digits in pussy, anus for sexual pleasure and outdoor sex pics I just wondered what people's thoughts were It is already illegal to publish many of those things in this country. the point being the amendment proposes to force ISPs to *block* sites containing material they don't deem appropriate for consenting adults to view that is published (served) from *other* countries. -Matt" Well, if the images are deemed unlawful (and I am not passing judgment on that), then banning access to them seems logical. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I have read an interesting article on the guardian website thatbthe goverment are looking to introduce a bill would block access to websites that show images of non coventianal sex acts Picture and videos that leaves marks, urination, female ejaculation, as well as sex in a public place it is believed would be captured by this The bill will force isps to block content that would not be certified for commercial DVD by the BBFC This I see has a huge impact for sites like this and other sites; that host pics of people being spanked multiple digits in pussy, anus for sexual pleasure and outdoor sex pics I just wondered what people's thoughts were It is already illegal to publish many of those things in this country. the point being the amendment proposes to force ISPs to *block* sites containing material they don't deem appropriate for consenting adults to view that is published (served) from *other* countries. -Matt Well, if the images are deemed unlawful (and I am not passing judgment on that), then banning access to them seems logical." It may seem a logic thing to try and do. But it is (speaking as someone who works on computer networks) pretty near unworkable. -Matt | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This has now been put back to December 2018, it is merely to stop children accessing inappropriate content from what i understand of it - I'm amazed there aren't more threads about this on here" There has been threads but probably under random thread titles. Good to know the update. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |