FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

The numbers game

Jump to newest
 

By *trawberry-pop OP   Woman
over a year ago

South East Midlands NOT

I just commented with this on a thread but thought maybe it would be good to see just how this works in your area.

Last night I did a search for men within the age range of 28-35 within 5 miles. 265 results came back. I did the same search for women, 14 came back.

So that's like 18 men for every woman I think?!

What are your local numbers like?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I did the same search and got 59 men to 30 women in my area... Not bad I suppose!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I just commented with this on a thread but thought maybe it would be good to see just how this works in your area.

Last night I did a search for men within the age range of 28-35 within 5 miles. 265 results came back. I did the same search for women, 14 came back.

So that's like 18 men for every woman I think?!

What are your local numbers like? "

Pretty similar tbh.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *erbyDalesCplCouple
over a year ago

Derbyshire

Without age-range, listing only verified users:

4 women

14 couples

37 men.

So technically 3:1 male:female.

Mr ddc

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *mmmMaybeCouple
over a year ago

West Wales

We need to move! Men/Women who want to meet couples within 5miles

186

12 of which were women!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Men in my age range within 20 miles. Over 300

Women in same search area. 110

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *trawberry-pop OP   Woman
over a year ago

South East Midlands NOT

Yes I should clarify I did men looking for women and women looking for men rather than bi people. I didn't look for couples but going back now to do so!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *trawberry-pop OP   Woman
over a year ago

South East Midlands NOT

I did couples and it's 145.

Also to add, I also used 'with public pics' as a parameter. I didn't select 'verified'.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondjoeMan
over a year ago

Glastonbury

Women: 21

Couples: 13

Men: 201

A buyer's market, clearly.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *erbyDalesCplCouple
over a year ago

Derbyshire


" I didn't select 'verified'."

If I uncheck "verified" I get an extra 2, but I'm not sure whether I should add them to the male or female category...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

253 men looking for women

29 women looking for men

Within a 5 mile radius of me with no age parameters applied

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *trawberry-pop OP   Woman
over a year ago

South East Midlands NOT


"253 men looking for women

29 women looking for men

Within a 5 mile radius of me with no age parameters applied

"

9ish men for each woman then!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *o-jCouple
over a year ago

Outskirts of Notts

81 women

300 men

But thats just the one looking for a couple .

Jo x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

always thought site average was 50:1

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *trawberry-pop OP   Woman
over a year ago

South East Midlands NOT


"always thought site average was 50:1"

I think that was a made up figure I don't know if anyone actually proved that!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

When the verified is added

There are 74 men looking for women

And 9 women looking for men

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"always thought site average was 50:1

I think that was a made up figure I don't know if anyone actually proved that!"

...that's basis of me never mailing anyone !

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Okay do they have to have been online in the last 2 weeks? Or online now or.... I can't join in if I don't know the rules

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *trawberry-pop OP   Woman
over a year ago

South East Midlands NOT


"always thought site average was 50:1

I think that was a made up figure I don't know if anyone actually proved that!...that's basis of me never mailing anyone !"

Well perhaps you could debunk the myth by doing your own local comparable search? Lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *erbyDalesCplCouple
over a year ago

Derbyshire


"253 men looking for women

29 women looking for men

Within a 5 mile radius of me with no age parameters applied

9ish men for each woman then! "

Except it isn't, is it?

If each couple consist of a man and a woman surely you have to add them in too, unless you are just trying to prove a point and ignore all data that doesn't fit.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *trawberry-pop OP   Woman
over a year ago

South East Midlands NOT


"Okay do they have to have been online in the last 2 weeks? Or online now or.... I can't join in if I don't know the rules "

Parameters I used were age range 28-35, public photos and that's it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *trawberry-pop OP   Woman
over a year ago

South East Midlands NOT


"253 men looking for women

29 women looking for men

Within a 5 mile radius of me with no age parameters applied

9ish men for each woman then!

Except it isn't, is it?

If each couple consist of a man and a woman surely you have to add them in too, unless you are just trying to prove a point and ignore all data that doesn't fit."

Er...I was just asking what people's locality was like for men and women! I didn't even think of couples because I'm not personally interested in couples. If you would like to conduct a more scientifically accurate experiment please feel free!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *erbyDalesCplCouple
over a year ago

Derbyshire


"253 men looking for women

29 women looking for men

Within a 5 mile radius of me with no age parameters applied

9ish men for each woman then!

Except it isn't, is it?

If each couple consist of a man and a woman surely you have to add them in too, unless you are just trying to prove a point and ignore all data that doesn't fit.

Er...I was just asking what people's locality was like for men and women! I didn't even think of couples because I'm not personally interested in couples. If you would like to conduct a more scientifically accurate experiment please feel free! "

Okay, but I'm pretty sure I'm a man. How scientific do you require the proof to be?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondjoeMan
over a year ago

Glastonbury


"always thought site average was 50:1

I think that was a made up figure I don't know if anyone actually proved that!...that's basis of me never mailing anyone !"

Well, if we pool a large enough sample it should be possible to extrapolate a rough if workable estimate.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Okay do they have to have been online in the last 2 weeks? Or online now or.... I can't join in if I don't know the rules

Parameters I used were age range 28-35, public photos and that's it. "

Using the same parameters to you...

there are 7 men and 1 woman....

Its Devon... could be the entire population

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *trawberry-pop OP   Woman
over a year ago

South East Midlands NOT


"253 men looking for women

29 women looking for men

Within a 5 mile radius of me with no age parameters applied

9ish men for each woman then!

Except it isn't, is it?

If each couple consist of a man and a woman surely you have to add them in too, unless you are just trying to prove a point and ignore all data that doesn't fit.

Er...I was just asking what people's locality was like for men and women! I didn't even think of couples because I'm not personally interested in couples. If you would like to conduct a more scientifically accurate experiment please feel free!

Okay, but I'm pretty sure I'm a man. How scientific do you require the proof to be? "

I'm not trying to prove anything I was just asking the question. If you want scientific proof then crack on with devising an actually scientific formula?! Lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *mmmMaybeCouple
over a year ago

West Wales


"Okay do they have to have been online in the last 2 weeks? Or online now or.... I can't join in if I don't know the rules

Parameters I used were age range 28-35, public photos and that's it. "

OK, same as but looking for couples 67men 1 woman, I kid you not!!

S

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Okay do they have to have been online in the last 2 weeks? Or online now or.... I can't join in if I don't know the rules

Parameters I used were age range 28-35, public photos and that's it.

Using the same parameters to you...

there are 7 men and 1 woman....

Its Devon... could be the entire population "

3 couples willing to meet men

6 couples willing to meet women

However I believe the sample age range is not suitable for Devon as mostly young people move away to get jobs; therefore I should conduct a search based upon my own parameters... if I had any; which I don't on account of me being a tart....

In general (and I have conducted this survey under a different profile a few years back I found the following to be true)

Men to women ratio 18:1

Men to Couples willing to meet men ratio 11:1

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *trawberry-pop OP   Woman
over a year ago

South East Midlands NOT


"Okay do they have to have been online in the last 2 weeks? Or online now or.... I can't join in if I don't know the rules

Parameters I used were age range 28-35, public photos and that's it.

OK, same as but looking for couples 67men 1 woman, I kid you not!!

S"

Lucky girl! Lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inaTitzTV/TS
over a year ago

Titz Towers, North Notts

My local numbers are great

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *erbyDalesCplCouple
over a year ago

Derbyshire


"

I'm not trying to prove anything I was just asking the question. If you want scientific proof then crack on with devising an actually scientific formula?! Lol "

I must have misunderstood your point on the other thread then. It appeared you were trying to demonstrate how many more men than women there are.

My point was simply that by excluding couples you are not giving a true picture. Regardless of who *you* want to meet, there are plenty of men who will happily swing with couples, hence there are more women than you are implying.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

I'm not trying to prove anything I was just asking the question. If you want scientific proof then crack on with devising an actually scientific formula?! Lol

I must have misunderstood your point on the other thread then. It appeared you were trying to demonstrate how many more men than women there are.

My point was simply that by excluding couples you are not giving a true picture. Regardless of who *you* want to meet, there are plenty of men who will happily swing with couples, hence there are more women than you are implying. "

one of you two is a lady person? that will teach me for avoiding looking at profiles and pics.... prepare to be fabbed!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *trawberry-pop OP   Woman
over a year ago

South East Midlands NOT


"

I'm not trying to prove anything I was just asking the question. If you want scientific proof then crack on with devising an actually scientific formula?! Lol

I must have misunderstood your point on the other thread then. It appeared you were trying to demonstrate how many more men than women there are.

My point was simply that by excluding couples you are not giving a true picture. Regardless of who *you* want to meet, there are plenty of men who will happily swing with couples, hence there are more women than you are implying. "

Sure, but I was just going by 'single' (I use that term loosely) people because it's usually men who are asking for advice on getting meets with women in my experience.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"253 men looking for women

29 women looking for men

Within a 5 mile radius of me with no age parameters applied

9ish men for each woman then!

Except it isn't, is it?

If each couple consist of a man and a woman surely you have to add them in too, unless you are just trying to prove a point and ignore all data that doesn't fit.

Er...I was just asking what people's locality was like for men and women! I didn't even think of couples because I'm not personally interested in couples. If you would like to conduct a more scientifically accurate experiment please feel free!

Okay, but I'm pretty sure I'm a man. How scientific do you require the proof to be? "

Observable and repeatable. That's the requirement of all scientific proof.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ambscouple2015Couple
over a year ago

Not in Wisbech but near

Looking to meet couples,

Men: 185

Couples: 50

Women: 12

Looking to meet men,

Men: 28

Couples: 26

Women: 30

Looking to meet women

Men: 215

Couples: 44

Women: 10

Within 5 miles of us.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *erbyDalesCplCouple
over a year ago

Derbyshire


"

Sure, but I was just going by 'single' (I use that term loosely) people because it's usually men who are asking for advice on getting meets with women in my experience. "

I think they start looking for women, then move onto couples, then, after a couple of months with still no meets, some start considering the option of Fab-straight

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *igeiaWoman
over a year ago

Bristol

There was a thread on this a while back searching for verified users within a 10 mile search radius with men looking for women and women looking for men. The ratios were between 7:1 and 10:1 nationwide for those parameters, with built up urban areas showing the best ratio for single men to single women (as far as it being a lower number).

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *erbyDalesCplCouple
over a year ago

Derbyshire


"

Okay, but I'm pretty sure I'm a man. How scientific do you require the proof to be?

Observable and repeatable. That's the requirement of all scientific proof."

That's the politest and most subtle request for a cock-pic I've ever had

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 14/11/16 13:29:13]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 14/11/16 13:32:10]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I live in a pretty boring place in the demographics of sex. I searched on who want to meet today and in the meet type "any" box.

45 women

243 men

113 couples

I reckon there are more camels in timbuktu lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *emini ManMan
over a year ago

There and to the left a bit

Maybe it's my location, or possibly using my own specified age range (34-58) but numbers came up as follows within a 5 mile radius:

Men looking for Women: 68

Women looking for Men: 11

Couples looking for Men: 12

Mind you, you can knock one off each of those to account for my profile, my partner's and our couples profile!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Sausage feast for the ladies then

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondjoeMan
over a year ago

Glastonbury


"Sausage feast for the ladies then "

Depends on your point of view

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Not sure but I've just looked at the local women and there is no way in hell approximately 50% of that are actually women, so I'd have to factor that in.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

Okay, but I'm pretty sure I'm a man. How scientific do you require the proof to be?

Observable and repeatable. That's the requirement of all scientific proof.

That's the politest and most subtle request for a cock-pic I've ever had "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *trawberry-pop OP   Woman
over a year ago

South East Midlands NOT


"Not sure but I've just looked at the local women and there is no way in hell approximately 50% of that are actually women, so I'd have to factor that in."

Hmm. I didn't check each individual profile myself I was just going on face value but you may have a point there!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *igjrvMan
over a year ago

blackwood

120 men 8 women and I think 5 of those used to be a man. Slim pickings

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

300 plus men, 50 women

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *harpDressed ManMan
over a year ago

Here occasionally, but mostly somewhere else

With pictures, not necessarily verified, within 5 miles, between 25 & 40....

Looking for men - 40 women and 37 couples

Looking for women - 502 men and 88 couples

(obviously some couples appear in both lists)

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *trawberry-pop OP   Woman
over a year ago

South East Midlands NOT

I'm now pondering out of the members you would 'like to meet' how many of them would you actually like to meet?! That must reduce things down even further!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orkie321bWoman
over a year ago

Nottingham

My search was for people aged 40-45, within 5 miles. I didn't apply any other filters such as having public pics, verified only or site supporter.

There are 29 women and 300+ men. No idea the exact number of men because when it gets to over 300 it doesn't tell you.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *harpDressed ManMan
over a year ago

Here occasionally, but mostly somewhere else


"My search was for people aged 40-45, within 5 miles. I didn't apply any other filters such as having public pics, verified only or site supporter.

There are 29 women and 300+ men. No idea the exact number of men because when it gets to over 300 it doesn't tell you."

If you really want to know, do it in smaller age ranges and add them up.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *harpDressed ManMan
over a year ago

Here occasionally, but mostly somewhere else


"I'm now pondering out of the members you would 'like to meet' how many of them would you actually like to meet?! That must reduce things down even further!"

Does....not...compute...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *trawberry-pop OP   Woman
over a year ago

South East Midlands NOT


"I'm now pondering out of the members you would 'like to meet' how many of them would you actually like to meet?! That must reduce things down even further!

Does....not...compute... "

Lol any and all of them?!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

Okay, but I'm pretty sure I'm a man. How scientific do you require the proof to be?

Observable and repeatable. That's the requirement of all scientific proof.

That's the politest and most subtle request for a cock-pic I've ever had "

Too subtle maybe cause no one sent any

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *erbyDalesCplCouple
over a year ago

Derbyshire


"

Okay, but I'm pretty sure I'm a man. How scientific do you require the proof to be?

Observable and repeatable. That's the requirement of all scientific proof.

That's the politest and most subtle request for a cock-pic I've ever had

Too subtle maybe cause no one sent any "

You have to sign a guarantee to pretend to swoon before I'll risk sending one of mine.

Though I'll need to find someone with incredibly small hands first...

Mr ddc

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

1 male

1 female.

Still no look. Deleted my message . unread.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Within 5 miles shows over 300 men V 32 women

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lla_maiWoman
over a year ago

staffordshire

300+ men

85 couples

56 females

Between 25-45 who want to meet women within a 5 mile radius

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lla_maiWoman
over a year ago

staffordshire


"300+ men

85 couples

56 females

Between 25-45 who want to meet women within a 5 mile radius"

72 eomen looking for men

Didnt change search

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *sGivesWoodWoman
over a year ago

ST. AUSTELL, CORNWALL

Men looking for women 300+

Women looking for men 34

No parameters didn't include couples

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *trawberry-pop OP   Woman
over a year ago

South East Midlands NOT


"Men looking for women 300+

Women looking for men 34

No parameters didn't include couples"

9ish women per man.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Oooh interesting. 300+ men (too many to count obviously), 199 women. So could be anything from 3/2 to infinity!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *trawberry-pop OP   Woman
over a year ago

South East Midlands NOT


"Oooh interesting. 300+ men (too many to count obviously), 199 women. So could be anything from 3/2 to infinity! "

The ladies of cardiff are loving the fab life! Did u put any age filters on that?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *trawberry-pop OP   Woman
over a year ago

South East Midlands NOT

Bumping following another thread.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top