FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Data protection

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

I've noticed that lots of men are posting pics of themselves with women ,doesn't this breach the data protection act ??

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ophieslutTV/TS
over a year ago

Central

I've no clue - often data laws are very strict for organisations, more than for individuals. Pics should exclude identifying characteristics here I believe.

But overall there is too much use of other people in some user's pics.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ophieslutTV/TS
over a year ago

Central

I'd visit the Information Commissioners Office online, as there should be good support help there.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I've noticed that lots of men are posting pics of themselves with women ,doesn't this breach the data protection act ??"

I don't think that they can get credit card details from a photo of someone giving a blowjob

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

i've got guys in my pics, but i asked the guys if i can use them first.

so long as you can't tell who the guy is then this site has no problem with you uploading pics like this, and same for women on mens profiles.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hyblueEyesMan
over a year ago

Daventry

You could possibly fall foul of the "revenge porn" laws if you didn't get somebody's permission to post a pic of them

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *enard ArgenteMan
over a year ago

London and France

No

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *erbyDalesCplCouple
over a year ago

Derbyshire


"I've noticed that lots of men are posting pics of themselves with women ,doesn't this breach the data protection act ??"

No.

But you could check with the ASA to be sure.

(besides in our private pics, there's more than two of us )

Mr ddc

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Why would the picture of a female hand on my arse break data protection?

Surely the whole crux of data protection is the protection (controlling the access, use, sharing/disclosure and destruction) of data which is personally identifiable (the data identifies a specific person, either on its own or when combined with the context or with other readily available data).

Yeah, I'm pretty sure I read something like that once.

So, a picture (the data) only needs "protection" if it identifies a specific person.

In this sense "protection" would mean that the data subject (the female in the photo with a cock in her gob, for example) must be made known of the photo being used and have choice/control over how it is used.

But this only applies if the photo identifies an individual through context (its likely who a body part belongs to when some people post a lot of pics together) or because of a face, location or identifying mark/tattoo/clothing/jewellery.

Or something like that

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Don't the site rules for pics state that other people in pics should not be identifiable..... that's why photo mods reject so many?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uckandbunnyCouple
over a year ago

In your bed

Revenge porn maybe, data protection no.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Why would the picture of a female hand on my arse break data protection?

Surely the whole crux of data protection is the protection (controlling the access, use, sharing/disclosure and destruction) of data which is personally identifiable (the data identifies a specific person, either on its own or when combined with the context or with other readily available data).

Yeah, I'm pretty sure I read something like that once.

So, a picture (the data) only needs "protection" if it identifies a specific person.

In this sense "protection" would mean that the data subject (the female in the photo with a cock in her gob, for example) must be made known of the photo being used and have choice/control over how it is used.

But this only applies if the photo identifies an individual through context (its likely who a body part belongs to when some people post a lot of pics together) or because of a face, location or identifying mark/tattoo/clothing/jewellery.

Or something like that "

Are you sure?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Are you sure? "

Would you trust anything anyone said on a sex site?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Are you sure?

Would you trust anything anyone said on a sex site? "

You mean they might actually mean avoid, and not fuck?! . Fuck.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Are you sure?

Would you trust anything anyone said on a sex site?

You mean they might actually mean avoid, and not fuck?! . Fuck. "

Does that mean avoid?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Are you sure?

Would you trust anything anyone said on a sex site?

You mean they might actually mean avoid, and not fuck?! . Fuck.

Does that mean avoid? "

I said "don't trust" not "assume the opposite"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Are you sure?

Would you trust anything anyone said on a sex site?

You mean they might actually mean avoid, and not fuck?! . Fuck.

Does that mean avoid? "

Oh to be that hand.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Are you sure?

Would you trust anything anyone said on a sex site?

You mean they might actually mean avoid, and not fuck?! . Fuck.

Does that mean avoid?

I said "don't trust" not "assume the opposite" "

Ah, good point. You're so good with the word things. Can I just assume the position?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iss.HoneyWoman
over a year ago

...

I uploaded a photo and you could clearly see the face between my..anyway

It got approved

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I uploaded a photo and you could clearly see the face between my..anyway

It got approved "

Have an image of you lying in wait with the camera...as they come up for air and you shouting say cheese

Consenting adults op is my guess

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iss.HoneyWoman
over a year ago

...


"I uploaded a photo and you could clearly see the face between my..anyway

It got approved

Have an image of you lying in wait with the camera...as they come up for air and you shouting say cheese

Consenting adults op is my guess "

That made me chuckle.

Smile for the camera

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Are you sure?

Would you trust anything anyone said on a sex site?

You mean they might actually mean avoid, and not fuck?! . Fuck.

Does that mean avoid?

I said "don't trust" not "assume the opposite"

Ah, good point. You're so good with the word things. Can I just assume the position? "

Which position exactly?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Are you sure?

Would you trust anything anyone said on a sex site?

You mean they might actually mean avoid, and not fuck?! . Fuck.

Does that mean avoid?

I said "don't trust" not "assume the opposite"

Ah, good point. You're so good with the word things. Can I just assume the position?

Which position exactly? "

All. Of. The. Positions.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rank n BettyCouple
over a year ago

Not meeting

If we include others we make sure they are not identifiable as much as possible. We also obtain permission before taking pics.

JG x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

We always ask the other person if they're in a pic we share. Plus always blur out anything identifiable.

Sarah

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top