Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
![]() | Back to forum list |
![]() | Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest | ![]() |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think Fab should boot the foolish off the site who think a faux 'legal' warning on their profile is of any benefit to anyone. Indeed, had such persons bothered to read the sites FAQ then they would know it's a waste of server space. I'd pay a premium to get rid of the gullible, sheep like mentality fools on Fab. " Ha ha you fell for the fake FAQ thing, oh you gullible fool lol ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'd be interested to hear the forum's thoughts on the following: The site seems to be plagued with immature single blokes who can't be bothered with anything more than sending "fancy a fuck" type emails then being abusive when they receive a rejection - if anything the problem appears to be getting worse. This obviously spoils the experience for the more genuine types amongst us. It's not unusual to get chatting to a new member only to find they're put off by the attitude of some guys on here and so they leave. What do members think to a more premium service, only accessible to those with verifications for instance? I'd pay more for membership if it filtered out some of the muppets! One other thought, could there be a filter for emails under a minimum character count or without photos attached - I appreciate all systems are open to abuse but something needs to change! M x " I get annoyed more by blokes who think they know what makes the site better for others. It takes me less than a second to ignore an unwanted message. No, I won't pay more for some obscure function that makes you feel superior. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The site seems to be plagued with immature single blokes who can't be bothered with anything more than sending "fancy a fuck" type emails then being abusive when they receive a rejection - if anything the problem appears to be getting worse. This obviously spoils the experience for the more genuine types amongst us. " I don't think the site is that full of them. They are easily ignored/blocked anyway. Crap profiles do not spoil it for the rest of you. If a guy can't stand out in a sea of crap then he's nothing special either ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think Fab should boot the foolish off the site who think a faux 'legal' warning on their profile is of any benefit to anyone. " I would also pay more money to filter those people out. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think Fab should boot the foolish off the site who think a faux 'legal' warning on their profile is of any benefit to anyone. Indeed, had such persons bothered to read the sites FAQ then they would know it's a waste of server space. I'd pay a premium to get rid of the gullible, sheep like mentality fools on Fab. Ha ha you fell for the fake FAQ thing, oh you gullible fool lol ![]() Not again! D'oh! ![]() ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'd be interested to hear the forum's thoughts on the following: The site seems to be plagued with immature single blokes who can't be bothered with anything more than sending "fancy a fuck" type emails then being abusive when they receive a rejection - if anything the problem appears to be getting worse. This obviously spoils the experience for the more genuine types amongst us. It's not unusual to get chatting to a new member only to find they're put off by the attitude of some guys on here and so they leave. What do members think to a more premium service, only accessible to those with verifications for instance? I'd pay more for membership if it filtered out some of the muppets! One other thought, could there be a filter for emails under a minimum character count or without photos attached - I appreciate all systems are open to abuse but something needs to change! M x I get annoyed more by blokes who think they know what makes the site better for others. It takes me less than a second to ignore an unwanted message. No, I won't pay more for some obscure function that makes you feel superior." Easy tiger! It's not a case of knowing better or being superior, it was a thought and I put it out there for some feedback. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think...... Hmmmm.... I think that I put up the most honest and recent photos that I have. I write a profile that best summarises me and my reason for being here. And then I don't send messages. I wait. Patiently. Respectfully; for the wink or message." Dus this realey work ? Cos this is the method im using atm but so far no luck. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Creating a premium section is unlikely to make a difference. In fact it may make some even more entitled. We've been on premium sites and it hasn't been a better experience. Possibly similar to how some people behave badly in clubs as they think as they've paid £50 for entry, it guarantees sex. " Some time ago I wrote a very long blog post on A.N.OtherFetishSite about how paying more money makes single men subconsciously feel more entitled than the women and couples that attend. It would be exactly the same for a higher cost premium membership (I wish that profiles weren't marked at all because they'd paid on this site). But like the famous beer company say - it's 'reassuringly expensive'. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'd be interested to hear the forum's thoughts on the following: The site seems to be plagued with immature single blokes who can't be bothered with anything more than sending "fancy a fuck" type emails then being abusive when they receive a rejection - if anything the problem appears to be getting worse. This obviously spoils the experience for the more genuine types amongst us. It's not unusual to get chatting to a new member only to find they're put off by the attitude of some guys on here and so they leave. What do members think to a more premium service, only accessible to those with verifications for instance? I'd pay more for membership if it filtered out some of the muppets! One other thought, could there be a filter for emails under a minimum character count or without photos attached - I appreciate all systems are open to abuse but something needs to change! M x " Can see your point but why should people have to pay more for that? Many people already support the site and if this is what people want then the site should be able to sort it without people paying more.. as you said the systems are open to abuse, would you want to pay more to find that things didn't really change? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" I get annoyed more by blokes who think they know what makes the site better for others. It takes me less than a second to ignore an unwanted message. No, I won't pay more for some obscure function that makes you feel superior." It's 2016 you can control who messages you and how you deal with this... Your attitude bis reflected in your ability to communicate or manage this !! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm genuine and do meet however I wouldn't or couldn't afford to pay for being here . I've learnt to manage my profile and deal with the idiots I don't think I should be penalised or segregated from the "good ones" because of money ![]() THIS!!!! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Does it work on the other big British swinging site? " There are no other sites ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" I get annoyed more by blokes who think they know what makes the site better for others. It takes me less than a second to ignore an unwanted message. No, I won't pay more for some obscure function that makes you feel superior. It's 2016 you can control who messages you and how you deal with this... Your attitude bis reflected in your ability to communicate or manage this !!" I am quite able to delete messages. It really is not a problem for me. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Does it work on the other big British swinging site? There are no other sites ![]() Of course there is! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Does it work on the other big British swinging site? There are no other sites ![]() not that anybody gives a hoot about it ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What do members think to a more premium service, only accessible to those with verifications for instance? I'd pay more for membership if it filtered out some of the muppets!" You can already filter out unverified users. And I think this is available for all. Imho though, I feel it's polite to pay, just as a way of saying "thank you" to the site owners. ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What do members think to a more premium service, only accessible to those with verifications for instance? I'd pay more for membership if it filtered out some of the muppets! You can already filter out unverified users. And I think this is available for all. Imho though, I feel it's polite to pay, just as a way of saying "thank you" to the site owners. ![]() I agree. It's how it is and that's how I like it so I'm willing to pay to keep it as it is apart from having a county search criteria. Even if there was a 'premium' section I wouldn't go in it anyway because it would be chock full of knob head men moaning they can't get a meet even though they've paid. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" would be chock full of knob head men moaning they can't get a meet even though they've paid. " Wow really That's not the "reason" | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" would be chock full of knob head men moaning they can't get a meet even though they've paid. Wow really That's not the "reason"" Yeah? What's your opinion then? Read the forums and see all the whingers - you think paying changes anything? I think not. The site is good as it is. If people don't use it effectively then that's their social Darwinism. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"My biggest issue is the completely and utterly fake verifications ! My friend Previous that Know this person It's fraudulent and ruins it for all of us decent genuine verified people" Just report it to admin. ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Read the forums and see all the whingers - " Ironic when your come back as such ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You do realise that: 1. being a dick 2. being a dick that pays for the privelege Doesn't negate the fact they are still a fucking dick right?..." My thoughts exactly! ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Read the forums and see all the whingers - Ironic when your come back as such ![]() I'm not whinging - I'm just saying that having a premium section of the site won't change anything. It's an error of judgement to think that it will. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'd be interested to hear the forum's thoughts on the following: The site seems to be plagued with immature single blokes who can't be bothered with anything more than sending "fancy a fuck" type emails then being abusive when they receive a rejection - if anything the problem appears to be getting worse. This obviously spoils the experience for the more genuine types amongst us. It's not unusual to get chatting to a new member only to find they're put off by the attitude of some guys on here and so they leave. What do members think to a more premium service, only accessible to those with verifications for instance? I'd pay more for membership if it filtered out some of the muppets! One other thought, could there be a filter for emails under a minimum character count or without photos attached - I appreciate all systems are open to abuse but something needs to change! M x I get annoyed more by blokes who think they know what makes the site better for others. It takes me less than a second to ignore an unwanted message. No, I won't pay more for some obscure function that makes you feel superior." ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'd be interested to hear the forum's thoughts on the following: The site seems to be plagued with immature single blokes who can't be bothered with anything more than sending "fancy a fuck" type emails then being abusive when they receive a rejection - if anything the problem appears to be getting worse. This obviously spoils the experience for the more genuine types amongst us. It's not unusual to get chatting to a new member only to find they're put off by the attitude of some guys on here and so they leave. What do members think to a more premium service, only accessible to those with verifications for instance? I'd pay more for membership if it filtered out some of the muppets! One other thought, could there be a filter for emails under a minimum character count or without photos attached - I appreciate all systems are open to abuse but something needs to change! M x I get annoyed more by blokes who think they know what makes the site better for others. It takes me less than a second to ignore an unwanted message. No, I won't pay more for some obscure function that makes you feel superior. ![]() Quite, perhaps that's why you decided to post yourself; after all you haven't proffered an opinion on the subject in question. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'd be interested to hear the forum's thoughts on the following: The site seems to be plagued with immature single blokes who can't be bothered with anything more than sending "fancy a fuck" type emails then being abusive when they receive a rejection - if anything the problem appears to be getting worse. This obviously spoils the experience for the more genuine types amongst us. It's not unusual to get chatting to a new member only to find they're put off by the attitude of some guys on here and so they leave. What do members think to a more premium service, only accessible to those with verifications for instance? I'd pay more for membership if it filtered out some of the muppets! One other thought, could there be a filter for emails under a minimum character count or without photos attached - I appreciate all systems are open to abuse but something needs to change! M x I get annoyed more by blokes who think they know what makes the site better for others. It takes me less than a second to ignore an unwanted message. No, I won't pay more for some obscure function that makes you feel superior. ![]() ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'd be interested to hear the forum's thoughts on the following: The site seems to be plagued with immature single blokes who can't be bothered with anything more than sending "fancy a fuck" type emails then being abusive when they receive a rejection - if anything the problem appears to be getting worse. This obviously spoils the experience for the more genuine types amongst us. It's not unusual to get chatting to a new member only to find they're put off by the attitude of some guys on here and so they leave. What do members think to a more premium service, only accessible to those with verifications for instance? I'd pay more for membership if it filtered out some of the muppets! One other thought, could there be a filter for emails under a minimum character count or without photos attached - I appreciate all systems are open to abuse but something needs to change! M x I get annoyed more by blokes who think they know what makes the site better for others. It takes me less than a second to ignore an unwanted message. No, I won't pay more for some obscure function that makes you feel superior. ![]() ![]() no, as above you still seem to miss the point of the original post. If I were to follow your logic then any forum post, mail, fab, wink etc is just a cry for attention, it just isn't the case - it's a conversation. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm genuine and do meet however I wouldn't or couldn't afford to pay for being here . I've learnt to manage my profile and deal with the idiots I don't think I should be penalised or segregated from the "good ones" because of money ![]() Fair point. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Read the forums and see all the whingers - Ironic when your come back as such ![]() Well, you’re wrong there matey-boo! ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top | ![]() |