Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
![]() | Back to forum list |
![]() | Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest | ![]() |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I would argue that putting the item back into a postbox also falls foul of section 84 of that act because you are causing delay. As far as opening other peoples post incorrectly addressed to your property you have to be acting in 'person’s detriment and without reasonable excuse' for it to be an offense. Therefore, since I was expitiding the prompt delivery I was acting in favour of the receipient there is no offense in this instance." As with most things laws are subjective and open to interpretation. Opening someone's medication - infringement of their privacy? What if it was a bank statement or STD test result? It seems you were acting in what you considered their best interests which is the main thing and I'm sure they'll be pleased their medication has been redirected ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"But to answer your question : yes - very unprofessional of them to disclose their personal details to a randomer that rang them up! I'm guessing the person in their call centre may need retraining! ![]() My thoughts exactly the data protection act is one that regularly gets companies in quiet a lot of trouble. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top | ![]() |