Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Keep them,but turn them into the tourist attraction they claim to be....Windsorland,where you can pet a corgi,try your hand at being a butler,enjoy high tea with the Queen,have a grand tour of Buckingham Palace,shout the orders for the changing of the guard and meet the whole family. " I like this | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I used to be a fan, but the more austerity I see, the more it feels wrong that they live at the tax payers expense in luxury. Have far more than they need. I know they do lots of good but wouldn't we save more money by becoming a republic? " Austerity! Yeah, we should get rid of over-large, part-foreign families living in an over-large houses in fucking central London? Being paid by the State? Disgustin'! Hmmm. Hang on a mo'... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Holy shit no. They do more good than bad. There's a reason this shitty little island is the 5th largest economy in the world. Whether I agree with aristocracy or not. It's here. It's been here 1000 years. It's the glue that holds the nation together imo " No, no it isn't. The French manage perfectly well without a royal family. People still queue to see Versailles. In fact probably more people go there because there's no royals clogging the place up. Oh, and the UK is the 5th largest economy in the world... so what? The US, China and Germany are all republics... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I am happy to pay my few £'s" Feel the same way. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Keep them,but turn them into the tourist attraction they claim to be....Windsorland,where you can pet a corgi,try your hand at being a butler,enjoy high tea with the Queen,have a grand tour of Buckingham Palace,shout the orders for the changing of the guard and meet the whole family. " That is a brilliant idea. On a serious note, it's not the state money that bugs me. It's pennies really compared to rest of government spending. It's more the fact it's such an outdated institution - I sometimes think that other countries don't take us seriously due to having a monarchy, regardless of their lack of true power. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Holy shit no. They do more good than bad. There's a reason this shitty little island is the 5th largest economy in the world. Whether I agree with aristocracy or not. It's here. It's been here 1000 years. It's the glue that holds the nation together imo No, no it isn't. The French manage perfectly well without a royal family. People still queue to see Versailles. " Louis the XIII gaf you mean? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" The US, China and Germany are all republics..." Both with a massive population and available resources. Expected really, no? Did'nt Germany have nobility before 1919? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The royals cost far far less than the useless and pointless work shy wankers that the towns of this country are full of, hanging around the job centres with their can of Stella in hand, waiting for their hand out to go and buy their fags... The royal family are an institution that is loved the world over.. That's pretty evident whenever you go into the tourist areas of the big smoke. Love em or loathe them, they are part of what makes this little isle Great. " I think they just cost more than weekly unemployment allowance ? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The royals cost far far less than the useless and pointless work shy wankers that the towns of this country are full of, hanging around the job centres with their can of Stella in hand, waiting for their hand out to go and buy their fags... The royal family are an institution that is loved the world over.. That's pretty evident whenever you go into the tourist areas of the big smoke. Love em or loathe them, they are part of what makes this little isle Great. I think they just cost more than weekly unemployment allowance ? " i dont think they cost us anything .. when you take into account what they bring in... they work tirelessly too. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I the Royal Family" So do I. The thoughts of having President Thatcher or Commissar Blair as our head of State horrifies me....!! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The royals cost far far less than the useless and pointless work shy wankers that the towns of this country are full of, hanging around the job centres with their can of Stella in hand, waiting for their hand out to go and buy their fags... The royal family are an institution that is loved the world over.. That's pretty evident whenever you go into the tourist areas of the big smoke. Love em or loathe them, they are part of what makes this little isle Great. I think they just cost more than weekly unemployment allowance ? " Far greater value for money and you never catch them pissing in the bushes in the park.. Well maybe Princess Margaret might have, but the rest are pretty well house trained. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I used to be a fan, but the more austerity I see, the more it feels wrong that they live at the tax payers expense in luxury. Have far more than they need. I know they do lots of good but wouldn't we save more money by becoming a republic? " Technically they don't live at the tax payers expense. Their stipend comes from a series of trusts set up by their predesessors. There is a surplus of funding which goes back into the treasury. Keep them. I like living in a country that has a monarchy. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The royals cost far far less than the useless and pointless work shy wankers that the towns of this country are full of, hanging around the job centres with their can of Stella in hand, waiting for their hand out to go and buy their fags... The royal family are an institution that is loved the world over.. That's pretty evident whenever you go into the tourist areas of the big smoke. Love em or loathe them, they are part of what makes this little isle Great. " Well said that man. Long live the Queen | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Holy shit no. They do more good than bad. There's a reason this shitty little island is the 5th largest economy in the world. Whether I agree with aristocracy or not. It's here. It's been here 1000 years. It's the glue that holds the nation together imo No, no it isn't. The French manage perfectly well without a royal family. People still queue to see Versailles. Louis the XIII gaf you mean? " Louis XIV, but whatever. That place | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I the Royal Family" You've just sunk in my estimation | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" The US, China and Germany are all republics... Both with a massive population and available resources. Expected really, no? Did'nt Germany have nobility before 1919? " Their nobility took them into WWI Guess again... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The royals cost far far less than the useless and pointless work shy wankers that the towns of this country are full of, hanging around the job centres with their can of Stella in hand, waiting for their hand out to go and buy their fags... The royal family are an institution that is loved the world over.. That's pretty evident whenever you go into the tourist areas of the big smoke. Love em or loathe them, they are part of what makes this little isle Great. I think they just cost more than weekly unemployment allowance ? Far greater value for money and you never catch them pissing in the bushes in the park.. Well maybe Princess Margaret might have, but the rest are pretty well house trained." Love it, best reply so far. Jim | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The Fact is The Queen and Royals bring Millions or maybe billions of pounds to the British Economy. In Tourism and trade." Oh really? The biggest myth about the Queen? Her contribution to the British economy... Supporters of the monarchy and its value to the UK often use the example of tourism as an area where the Royals haul in money. Brand Finance’s calculations show that tourism revenue connected to the monarchy and its heritage has been valued at £535 million for 2015. Campaign group Republic, which calls for the abolition of the monarchy, claims that it’s own research shows the monarchy costs the UK £334 million a year, with each “working royal” costing the taxpayer £18.5 million a piece. There isn’t any evidence to suggest there is any economic benefit to the royal family. Any benefit mentioned is from assets that belong to the nation - like tourist attractions - which would still belong to the nation if the monarchy was abolished. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Keep them Britain wouldnt be Britain without our Monachy " Yes it would | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Keep them Britain wouldnt be Britain without our Monachy Yes it would " no it W O U L D N'T | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The royals cost far far less than the useless and pointless work shy wankers that the towns of this country are full of, hanging around the job centres with their can of Stella in hand, waiting for their hand out to go and buy their fags... The royal family are an institution that is loved the world over.. That's pretty evident whenever you go into the tourist areas of the big smoke. Love em or loathe them, they are part of what makes this little isle Great. I think they just cost more than weekly unemployment allowance ? i dont think they cost us anything .. when you take into account what they bring in... they work tirelessly too. " They don't ever have to wait on a waiting list for the NHS though ? Cook for themselves. Worry about where their next penny comes from ? I could work tirelessly with all that they have at my disposal. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Keep them Britain wouldnt be Britain without our Monachy Yes it would no it W O U L D N'T " Would | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The royals cost far far less than the useless and pointless work shy wankers that the towns of this country are full of, hanging around the job centres with their can of Stella in hand, waiting for their hand out to go and buy their fags... The royal family are an institution that is loved the world over.. That's pretty evident whenever you go into the tourist areas of the big smoke. Love em or loathe them, they are part of what makes this little isle Great. I think they just cost more than weekly unemployment allowance ? i dont think they cost us anything .. when you take into account what they bring in... they work tirelessly too. They don't ever have to wait on a waiting list for the NHS though ? Cook for themselves. Worry about where their next penny comes from ? I could work tirelessly with all that they have at my disposal. " Don't forget the flunkies, cushion plumpers, private secretaries and toothpaste squeezers | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"That the royal family are better than non-royal people is ss a terrible belief for people to have. People shouldn't live in a system that instigates inferiority amongst its citizens. It's just not healthy." Just amongst footballers and reality TV stars | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Keep them Britain wouldnt be Britain without our Monachy Yes it would no it W O U L D N'T Would " lets just agree to disagree on this one | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Keep them Britain wouldnt be Britain without our Monachy Yes it would no it W O U L D N'T Would lets just agree to disagree on this one " Off with their 'eads. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just another load of foreigners to add to our evergrowing amount. " They've been here a while now though....surely they have citizenship after so many generations?! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Keep the royals, bin half the politicians. Put the MPs that are left on performance relate minimum wage " Let's bin the royals and pay our politicians more? That's radical | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Keep them Britain wouldnt be Britain without our Monachy Yes it would no it W O U L D N'T Would lets just agree to disagree on this one Off with their 'eads. " off with your 'ead | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" The US, China and Germany are all republics... Both with a massive population and available resources. Expected really, no? Did'nt Germany have nobility before 1919? Their nobility took them into WWI Guess again..." The US government took Americans into Vietnam? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Keep them Britain wouldnt be Britain without our Monachy Yes it would no it W O U L D N'T Would lets just agree to disagree on this one Off with their 'eads. off with your 'ead " On what grounds? This isn't the Middle Ages where some divinely-appointed nonce in a funny hat can order the Lord High Executioner to separate my head from my body. That is progress | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" The US, China and Germany are all republics... Both with a massive population and available resources. Expected really, no? Did'nt Germany have nobility before 1919? Their nobility took them into WWI Guess again... The US government took Americans into Vietnam? " This argument is circular! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Keep them Britain wouldnt be Britain without our Monachy Yes it would no it W O U L D N'T Would lets just agree to disagree on this one Off with their 'eads. off with your 'ead On what grounds? This isn't the Middle Ages where some divinely-appointed nonce in a funny hat can order the Lord High Executioner to separate my head from my body. That is progress " on my grounds i have a direct link to her majesty and you deserve to be locked up in the dungeon naked and shackled for your own safety | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I used to be a fan, but the more austerity I see, the more it feels wrong that they live at the tax payers expense in luxury. Have far more than they need. I know they do lots of good but wouldn't we save more money by becoming a republic? " I think we should definitely keep them. In one way you are right they take a lot of taxpayers money but on the other hand they do generate a lot of money too through tourism to the uk. When you break it down the costs probably cancel each other out, or I'd even wager that they generate more money through tourism to the UK than they take in taxpayer handouts. Plus they are good will embassador's and generally well liked and respected all over the world. They do a lot of good in the world and generate a lot of money for charities. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I used to be a fan, but the more austerity I see, the more it feels wrong that they live at the tax payers expense in luxury. Have far more than they need. I know they do lots of good but wouldn't we save more money by becoming a republic? I think we should definitely keep them. In one way you are right they take a lot of taxpayers money but on the other hand they do generate a lot of money too through tourism to the uk. When you break it down the costs probably cancel each other out, or I'd even wager that they generate more money through tourism to the UK than they take in taxpayer handouts. Plus they are good will embassador's and generally well liked and respected all over the world. They do a lot of good in the world and generate a lot of money for charities. " *as Mandy Rice Davies* "Well he would say that, wouldn't he?" | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The Fact is The Queen and Royals bring Millions or maybe billions of pounds to the British Economy. In Tourism and trade. Oh really? The biggest myth about the Queen? Her contribution to the British economy... Supporters of the monarchy and its value to the UK often use the example of tourism as an area where the Royals haul in money. Brand Finance’s calculations show that tourism revenue connected to the monarchy and its heritage has been valued at £535 million for 2015. Campaign group Republic, which calls for the abolition of the monarchy, claims that it’s own research shows the monarchy costs the UK £334 million a year, with each “working royal” costing the taxpayer £18.5 million a piece. There isn’t any evidence to suggest there is any economic benefit to the royal family. Any benefit mentioned is from assets that belong to the nation - like tourist attractions - which would still belong to the nation if the monarchy was abolished." Those tourist attractions would be a waste of time without a Royal family to live in them and would not generate any tourism at all. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I used to be a fan, but the more austerity I see, the more it feels wrong that they live at the tax payers expense in luxury. Have far more than they need. I know they do lots of good but wouldn't we save more money by becoming a republic? I think we should definitely keep them. In one way you are right they take a lot of taxpayers money but on the other hand they do generate a lot of money too through tourism to the uk. When you break it down the costs probably cancel each other out, or I'd even wager that they generate more money through tourism to the UK than they take in taxpayer handouts. Plus they are good will embassador's and generally well liked and respected all over the world. They do a lot of good in the world and generate a lot of money for charities. *as Mandy Rice Davies* "Well he would say that, wouldn't he?" " Don't you have some more Mr Men books to go and read Joe? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I used to be a fan, but the more austerity I see, the more it feels wrong that they live at the tax payers expense in luxury. Have far more than they need. I know they do lots of good but wouldn't we save more money by becoming a republic? I think we should definitely keep them. In one way you are right they take a lot of taxpayers money but on the other hand they do generate a lot of money too through tourism to the uk. When you break it down the costs probably cancel each other out, or I'd even wager that they generate more money through tourism to the UK than they take in taxpayer handouts. Plus they are good will embassador's and generally well liked and respected all over the world. They do a lot of good in the world and generate a lot of money for charities. *as Mandy Rice Davies* "Well he would say that, wouldn't he?" Don't you have some more Mr Men books to go and read Joe? " *Mr* Joe, if you please. Look again, and I think you'll find I write my own books these days | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The Fact is The Queen and Royals bring Millions or maybe billions of pounds to the British Economy. In Tourism and trade. Oh really? The biggest myth about the Queen? Her contribution to the British economy... Supporters of the monarchy and its value to the UK often use the example of tourism as an area where the Royals haul in money. Brand Finance’s calculations show that tourism revenue connected to the monarchy and its heritage has been valued at £535 million for 2015. Campaign group Republic, which calls for the abolition of the monarchy, claims that it’s own research shows the monarchy costs the UK £334 million a year, with each “working royal” costing the taxpayer £18.5 million a piece. There isn’t any evidence to suggest there is any economic benefit to the royal family. Any benefit mentioned is from assets that belong to the nation - like tourist attractions - which would still belong to the nation if the monarchy was abolished. Those tourist attractions would be a waste of time without a Royal family to live in them and would not generate any tourism at all. " The Tower of London still does? The Crown Jewels would still be there as they belong to the state. Buckingham Palace would generate more income as be open all year round to visitors. Same with Balmoral and Sandringham I'm guessing. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |