Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to The Lounge |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We came off FAB a few months ago due to the number of fakes, scammers and trolls. Met a few nice genuine couples, although we found clubs to be more appealing to the genuine swingers. There still seems to be a large number of so called couples without photo verifications or any veries. Should the site set a time limit for couples to prove themselves, surely this would out the scammers . " No. I'll run my profile my way and keep it within Fab guidelines. Thank you. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We came off FAB a few months ago due to the number of fakes, scammers and trolls. Met a few nice genuine couples, although we found clubs to be more appealing to the genuine swingers. There still seems to be a large number of so called couples without photo verifications or any veries. Should the site set a time limit for couples to prove themselves, surely this would out the scammers . " sure, by all means, that is, if you want to see the end of fab It is up to you to decide who you become friends with and that is directly your choice through your judgement If you feel you cannot make that decision, do not make friends or plan to meet | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Surely the filters, your own experience and common sense let you circumnavigate these profiles?" There's the problem right there, some people only have 2 out of the 3.  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Surely the filters, your own experience and common sense let you circumnavigate these profiles? There's the problem right there, some people only have 2 out of the 3. " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
people go at different paces... if there pace happens to be different to yours, move on!!!  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We came off FAB a few months ago due to the number of fakes, scammers and trolls. Met a few nice genuine couples, although we found clubs to be more appealing to the genuine swingers. There still seems to be a large number of so called couples without photo verifications or any veries. Should the site set a time limit for couples to prove themselves, surely this would out the scammers . " I'm guessing you wouldn't have posted this suggestion 9 days ago.  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Mr ddc | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Aren't fakes different to trolls though? I thought fakes were people who didn't want to meet you, whereas trolls were people who disagreed with your point of _iew...
Mr ddc"Is it possible to be both? Sounds like hard work, so I'd stick with one or the other. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Aren't fakes different to trolls though? I thought fakes were people who didn't want to meet you, whereas trolls were people who disagreed with your point of _iew...
Mr ddc
Is it possible to be both?
Sounds like hard work, so I'd stick with one or the other. "Wouldn't a fake troll just be another billy goat? Possibly one with a hangover? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Maybe we are all trolls and they are the genuine one's? Oh wow, heavy heavy heavy. That looks just like a negative reality inversion..... " I still think the OP wouldn't have posted this 9 days ago. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Beg to differ we had lots of verifications prior to our break ! Basically the site attracts fakes who claim to be genuine couples a more stringent process would rid the site of fakes and become more credible " Its us who need a stringent process, not the site. You pick who you talk to, and meet. Do it carefully and theres no issue.  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Beg to differ we had lots of verifications prior to our break ! Basically the site attracts fakes who claim to be genuine couples a more stringent process would rid the site of fakes and become more credible " I'm always puzzled by "stuff" like this. You were here before. Now you're back. But the site is terrible. If you don't like it, use the delete profile button, then you won't have to suffer it's dreadfullness. It's by far the best site I've been on. It also offers the best value for money. Although I've not been a member for long, less than 2 years, I've never encountered a fake or a time waster. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yeah 7 day's to get verified if not they kicked off "You saw it too then. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Beg to differ we had lots of verifications prior to our break ! Basically the site attracts fakes who claim to be genuine couples a more stringent process would rid the site of fakes and become more credible " Every site attracts fakes unfortunately, short of holding some sort of audition (which could be fun) there isn't a fail safe way to exclude them.. and if more and more stringent rules are put in place then I suspect it would damage the membership numbers.. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
. It's how you use it that determines your success. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We came off FAB a few months ago due to the number of fakes, scammers and trolls. Met a few nice genuine couples, although we found clubs to be more appealing to the genuine swingers. There still seems to be a large number of so called couples without photo verifications or any veries. Should the site set a time limit for couples to prove themselves, surely this would out the scammers . " Are we aloud to ask questions about what the site should maybe start doing ? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Did we mention the site was terrible ??? Merely stating improvements could be made to stop fake accounts. Bloody hell keeping our opinions to ourselfs from now on ! " There is a way: Become a gold/paid member and only allow gold/paid members to message you. Fakes don't often upgrade. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"? Are we ?" Yes we are allowed. We are not allowed to question mod decisions. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We could all have to go to London, take photo ID and something official with our address on (from within the last 3 months), some photo both pics that can be cut out and laminated on FAB Genuine cards. We could then show our FAB Genuine cards on our profile or have a purple tick that shows we have one. I think this would work "Where do I sign up? I like purple. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Any swingers site or social media site with no trolls The site provides tools to minimise the time wasters and fools, The issue is men moan about women, women moan about men and that drives me childish reactions and stupid games. And then there's couples, they moan about both" Is that a poem? 
Re the OP: "internet in "people not always what they claim to be" shocker....." | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Did we mention the site was terrible ??? Merely stating improvements could be made to stop fake accounts. Bloody hell keeping our opinions to ourselfs from now on ! " I think people came to the conclusion you thought the site was bad because you stated that you left the site because of the trolls etc. Of course you can give your opinion but so can others. Posting a thread to have people agree with you and validate your position only really works with threads about cake and biscuits (even then *someone* will be along to tell you to have an apple instead). If you actually want a discussion then sensibly counter what others are saying. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We came off FAB a few months ago due to the number of fakes, scammers and trolls. Met a few nice genuine couples, although we found clubs to be more appealing to the genuine swingers. There still seems to be a large number of so called couples without photo verifications or any veries. Should the site set a time limit for couples to prove themselves, surely this would out the scammers . " 2 days after they are banned they pop up under a new name and start again  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Did we mention the site was terrible ??? Merely stating improvements could be made to stop fake accounts. Bloody hell keeping our opinions to ourselfs from now on ! " You complained about the site. You suggested how YOU wanted the site to be run YOUR way. As I said, people run their profile, their way. That's the point and the freedom Fab offers. I think it's a pretty good USP really. That and the verification system. The sites been running for years quite happily. If you've been here before, you know what it's like, surely? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Did we mention the site was terrible ??? Merely stating improvements could be made to stop fake accounts. Bloody hell keeping our opinions to ourselfs from now on ! " Were we all supposed to rush to agree with you? No need to chuck your toys out the pram, is it a silvercross btw? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Did we mention the site was terrible ??? Merely stating improvements could be made to stop fake accounts. Bloody hell keeping our opinions to ourselfs from now on ! I think people came to the conclusion you thought the site was bad because you stated that you left the site because of the trolls etc. Of course you can give your opinion but so can others. Posting a thread to have people agree with you and validate your position only really works with threads about cake and biscuits (even then *someone* will be along to tell you to have an apple instead). If you actually want a discussion then sensibly counter what others are saying. " Cake you say........  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We could all have to go to London, take photo ID and something official with our address on (from within the last 3 months), some photo both pics that can be cut out and laminated on FAB Genuine cards. We could then show our FAB Genuine cards on our profile or have a purple tick that shows we have one. I think this would work
Where do I sign up? I like purple."Just join the 'I'm not fake/Troll/Timewaster' queue | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Fair comment but if people wish to make a valid comment they should digest the text "People can actually put pretty much what they like. You left because of trolls etc. now you're back complaining about them. What are we supposed to say? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We could all have to go to London, take photo ID and something official with our address on (from within the last 3 months), some photo both pics that can be cut out and laminated on FAB Genuine cards. We could then show our FAB Genuine cards on our profile or have a purple tick that shows we have one. I think this would work
Where do I sign up? I like purple.
Just join the 'I'm not fake/Troll/Timewaster' queue "Bloody queues. How very English. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Fair comment but if people wish to make a valid comment they should digest the text "If you use the quote button then we can see which comments you are responding to. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How's about the gold site supporters fee be increased to 30 quid for 30 days, that's a quid a day and I think it's worth it to be honest. If you supply photo ID ie drivers license or passport it's then reduced to 15 quid for 30 days If you supply both photo ID or drivers/passport and photo ID of face shot with the paper with writing on Then you are a higher rated member and your fee is 10 quid for 30 days ? " I'm not giving a random internet site my passport details or drivers licence. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How's about the gold site supporters fee be increased to 30 quid for 30 days, that's a quid a day and I think it's worth it to be honest. If you supply photo ID ie drivers license or passport it's then reduced to 15 quid for 30 days If you supply both photo ID or drivers/passport and photo ID of face shot with the paper with writing on Then you are a higher rated member and your fee is 10 quid for 30 days ? " Most people would leave. Particularly the single guys, who apparently are much in demand, although the anecdotal evidence suggests otherwise. Why would people pay so much to belong to a site where it was so difficult to get a meet? Where's the incentive? You think blokes attitudes, expectations and sense of entitlement are poor on a free site? Think about what their expectations would be on a site that cost £30 a month. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How's about the gold site supporters fee be increased to 30 quid for 30 days, that's a quid a day and I think it's worth it to be honest. If you supply photo ID ie drivers license or passport it's then reduced to 15 quid for 30 days If you supply both photo ID or drivers/passport and photo ID of face shot with the paper with writing on Then you are a higher rated member and your fee is 10 quid for 30 days ? I'm not giving a random internet site my passport details or drivers licence. " Although, one of the proposals to help police the internet and keep us all safe is for anyone accessing an adult site to verify they are old enough by entering a credit card number. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How's about the gold site supporters fee be increased to 30 quid for 30 days, that's a quid a day and I think it's worth it to be honest. If you supply photo ID ie drivers license or passport it's then reduced to 15 quid for 30 days If you supply both photo ID or drivers/passport and photo ID of face shot with the paper with writing on Then you are a higher rated member and your fee is 10 quid for 30 days ? I'm not giving a random internet site my passport details or drivers licence. Although, one of the proposals to help police the internet and keep us all safe is for anyone accessing an adult site to verify they are old enough by entering a credit card number. " Thats me gone then. Dont have 1. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How's about the gold site supporters fee be increased to 30 quid for 30 days, that's a quid a day and I think it's worth it to be honest. If you supply photo ID ie drivers license or passport it's then reduced to 15 quid for 30 days If you supply both photo ID or drivers/passport and photo ID of face shot with the paper with writing on Then you are a higher rated member and your fee is 10 quid for 30 days ? Most people would leave. Particularly the single guys, who apparently are much in demand, although the anecdotal evidence suggests otherwise. Why would people pay so much to belong to a site where it was so difficult to get a meet? Where's the incentive? You think blokes attitudes, expectations and sense of entitlement are poor on a free site? Think about what their expectations would be on a site that cost £30 a month. "I've used a site where men had to pay quite a significant amount to be able to message women. It was a bit grim. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How's about the gold site supporters fee be increased to 30 quid for 30 days, that's a quid a day and I think it's worth it to be honest. If you supply photo ID ie drivers license or passport it's then reduced to 15 quid for 30 days If you supply both photo ID or drivers/passport and photo ID of face shot with the paper with writing on Then you are a higher rated member and your fee is 10 quid for 30 days ? Most people would leave. Particularly the single guys, who apparently are much in demand, although the anecdotal evidence suggests otherwise. Why would people pay so much to belong to a site where it was so difficult to get a meet? Where's the incentive? You think blokes attitudes, expectations and sense of entitlement are poor on a free site? Think about what their expectations would be on a site that cost £30 a month. "Haven't you seen the threads from those who have become silver or gold supporters and feeling aggrieved that it hasn't secured them a meet? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How's about the gold site supporters fee be increased to 30 quid for 30 days, that's a quid a day and I think it's worth it to be honest. If you supply photo ID ie drivers license or passport it's then reduced to 15 quid for 30 days If you supply both photo ID or drivers/passport and photo ID of face shot with the paper with writing on Then you are a higher rated member and your fee is 10 quid for 30 days ? Most people would leave. Particularly the single guys, who apparently are much in demand, although the anecdotal evidence suggests otherwise. Why would people pay so much to belong to a site where it was so difficult to get a meet? Where's the incentive? You think blokes attitudes, expectations and sense of entitlement are poor on a free site? Think about what their expectations would be on a site that cost £30 a month.
I've used a site where men had to pay quite a significant amount to be able to message women. It was a bit grim."I think I signed up for one of those, supposedly it's "quite good", but as soon as a site tries to charge me for messaging people, I seem to assume th whole thing is probably a scam and I leave. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How's about the gold site supporters fee be increased to 30 quid for 30 days, that's a quid a day and I think it's worth it to be honest. If you supply photo ID ie drivers license or passport it's then reduced to 15 quid for 30 days If you supply both photo ID or drivers/passport and photo ID of face shot with the paper with writing on Then you are a higher rated member and your fee is 10 quid for 30 days ? Most people would leave. Particularly the single guys, who apparently are much in demand, although the anecdotal evidence suggests otherwise. Why would people pay so much to belong to a site where it was so difficult to get a meet? Where's the incentive? You think blokes attitudes, expectations and sense of entitlement are poor on a free site? Think about what their expectations would be on a site that cost £30 a month.
Haven't you seen the threads from those who have become silver or gold supporters and feeling aggrieved that it hasn't secured them a meet?
"You know why I'm a silver supporter? It's because your inbox "threads" messages, so I can remember what it is I've talked about to people. Sad, innit? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How's about the gold site supporters fee be increased to 30 quid for 30 days, that's a quid a day and I think it's worth it to be honest. If you supply photo ID ie drivers license or passport it's then reduced to 15 quid for 30 days If you supply both photo ID or drivers/passport and photo ID of face shot with the paper with writing on Then you are a higher rated member and your fee is 10 quid for 30 days ? Most people would leave. Particularly the single guys, who apparently are much in demand, although the anecdotal evidence suggests otherwise. Why would people pay so much to belong to a site where it was so difficult to get a meet? Where's the incentive? You think blokes attitudes, expectations and sense of entitlement are poor on a free site? Think about what their expectations would be on a site that cost £30 a month.
I've used a site where men had to pay quite a significant amount to be able to message women. It was a bit grim."It wasn't P..y N.....y was it? What a bullshite site that was. They even tried to get me to pay so I could talk to a woman by taking women coming onto me . If not, as you were | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How's about the gold site supporters fee be increased to 30 quid for 30 days, that's a quid a day and I think it's worth it to be honest. If you supply photo ID ie drivers license or passport it's then reduced to 15 quid for 30 days If you supply both photo ID or drivers/passport and photo ID of face shot with the paper with writing on Then you are a higher rated member and your fee is 10 quid for 30 days ? Most people would leave. Particularly the single guys, who apparently are much in demand, although the anecdotal evidence suggests otherwise. Why would people pay so much to belong to a site where it was so difficult to get a meet? Where's the incentive? You think blokes attitudes, expectations and sense of entitlement are poor on a free site? Think about what their expectations would be on a site that cost £30 a month.
I've used a site where men had to pay quite a significant amount to be able to message women. It was a bit grim."I think I was on that site, thought I recognised you. Sorry about all the cock pics..... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How's about the gold site supporters fee be increased to 30 quid for 30 days, that's a quid a day and I think it's worth it to be honest. If you supply photo ID ie drivers license or passport it's then reduced to 15 quid for 30 days If you supply both photo ID or drivers/passport and photo ID of face shot with the paper with writing on Then you are a higher rated member and your fee is 10 quid for 30 days ? Most people would leave. Particularly the single guys, who apparently are much in demand, although the anecdotal evidence suggests otherwise. Why would people pay so much to belong to a site where it was so difficult to get a meet? Where's the incentive? You think blokes attitudes, expectations and sense of entitlement are poor on a free site? Think about what their expectations would be on a site that cost £30 a month.
I've used a site where men had to pay quite a significant amount to be able to message women. It was a bit grim.
It wasn't P..y N.....y was it? What a bullshite site that was. They even tried to get me to pay so I could talk to a woman by taking women coming onto me . If not, as you were "Oops faking women | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How's about the gold site supporters fee be increased to 30 quid for 30 days, that's a quid a day and I think it's worth it to be honest. If you supply photo ID ie drivers license or passport it's then reduced to 15 quid for 30 days If you supply both photo ID or drivers/passport and photo ID of face shot with the paper with writing on Then you are a higher rated member and your fee is 10 quid for 30 days ? Most people would leave. Particularly the single guys, who apparently are much in demand, although the anecdotal evidence suggests otherwise. Why would people pay so much to belong to a site where it was so difficult to get a meet? Where's the incentive? You think blokes attitudes, expectations and sense of entitlement are poor on a free site? Think about what their expectations would be on a site that cost £30 a month.
Haven't you seen the threads from those who have become silver or gold supporters and feeling aggrieved that it hasn't secured them a meet?
"It's worse for us platinum members..... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How's about the gold site supporters fee be increased to 30 quid for 30 days, that's a quid a day and I think it's worth it to be honest. If you supply photo ID ie drivers license or passport it's then reduced to 15 quid for 30 days If you supply both photo ID or drivers/passport and photo ID of face shot with the paper with writing on Then you are a higher rated member and your fee is 10 quid for 30 days ? Most people would leave. Particularly the single guys, who apparently are much in demand, although the anecdotal evidence suggests otherwise. Why would people pay so much to belong to a site where it was so difficult to get a meet? Where's the incentive? You think blokes attitudes, expectations and sense of entitlement are poor on a free site? Think about what their expectations would be on a site that cost £30 a month.
I've used a site where men had to pay quite a significant amount to be able to message women. It was a bit grim.
It wasn't P..y N.....y was it? What a bullshite site that was. They even tried to get me to pay so I could talk to a woman by taking women coming onto me . If not, as you were "No it wasn't...would have thought site-created fake female profiles would be a big risk on any paying sites though | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How's about the gold site supporters fee be increased to 30 quid for 30 days, that's a quid a day and I think it's worth it to be honest. If you supply photo ID ie drivers license or passport it's then reduced to 15 quid for 30 days If you supply both photo ID or drivers/passport and photo ID of face shot with the paper with writing on Then you are a higher rated member and your fee is 10 quid for 30 days ? I'm not giving a random internet site my passport details or drivers licence. Although, one of the proposals to help police the internet and keep us all safe is for anyone accessing an adult site to verify they are old enough by entering a credit card number. " Which I don't have. I'd be out in the cold. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Beg to differ we had lots of verifications prior to our break ! Basically the site attracts fakes who claim to be genuine couples a more stringent process would rid the site of fakes and become more credible I'm always puzzled by "stuff" like this. You were here before. Now you're back. But the site is terrible. If you don't like it, use the delete profile button, then you won't have to suffer it's dreadfullness. It's by far the best site I've been on. It also offers the best value for money. Although I've not been a member for long, less than 2 years, I've never encountered a fake or a time waster. " That's because they don't turn up | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We came off FAB a few months ago due to the number of fakes, scammers and trolls. Met a few nice genuine couples, although we found clubs to be more appealing to the genuine swingers. There still seems to be a large number of so called couples without photo verifications or any veries. Should the site set a time limit for couples to prove themselves, surely this would out the scammers . " OP, if you've really encountered loads of fakes, timewasters and trolls in the week you've been back, maybe the real cause of your angst is your selection process. I've genuinely not encountered one in my time here. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Haven't you seen the threads from those who have become silver or gold supporters and feeling aggrieved that it hasn't secured them a meet? You know why I'm a silver supporter? It's because your inbox "threads" messages, so I can remember what it is I've talked about to people. Sad, innit? "It's better than throwing a strop because you haven't had a meet. But then you've got women throwing their knickers at you and can turn us down because you've got so many options. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How's about the gold site supporters fee be increased to 30 quid for 30 days, that's a quid a day and I think it's worth it to be honest. If you supply photo ID ie drivers license or passport it's then reduced to 15 quid for 30 days If you supply both photo ID or drivers/passport and photo ID of face shot with the paper with writing on Then you are a higher rated member and your fee is 10 quid for 30 days ? Most people would leave. Particularly the single guys, who apparently are much in demand, although the anecdotal evidence suggests otherwise. Why would people pay so much to belong to a site where it was so difficult to get a meet? Where's the incentive? You think blokes attitudes, expectations and sense of entitlement are poor on a free site? Think about what their expectations would be on a site that cost £30 a month.
I've used a site where men had to pay quite a significant amount to be able to message women. It was a bit grim.
It wasn't P..y N.....y was it? What a bullshite site that was. They even tried to get me to pay so I could talk to a woman by taking women coming onto me . If not, as you were
No it wasn't...would have thought site-created fake female profiles would be a big risk on any paying sites though "It started off that these fake profiles would lure men back to the site when their membership was up. They'd renew but the women went to ground. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How's about the gold site supporters fee be increased to 30 quid for 30 days, that's a quid a day and I think it's worth it to be honest. If you supply photo ID ie drivers license or passport it's then reduced to 15 quid for 30 days If you supply both photo ID or drivers/passport and photo ID of face shot with the paper with writing on Then you are a higher rated member and your fee is 10 quid for 30 days ? Most people would leave. Particularly the single guys, who apparently are much in demand, although the anecdotal evidence suggests otherwise. Why would people pay so much to belong to a site where it was so difficult to get a meet? Where's the incentive? You think blokes attitudes, expectations and sense of entitlement are poor on a free site? Think about what their expectations would be on a site that cost £30 a month.
I've used a site where men had to pay quite a significant amount to be able to message women. It was a bit grim.
It wasn't P..y N.....y was it? What a bullshite site that was. They even tried to get me to pay so I could talk to a woman by taking women coming onto me . If not, as you were
No it wasn't...would have thought site-created fake female profiles would be a big risk on any paying sites though
It started off that these fake profiles would lure men back to the site when their membership was up. They'd renew but the women went to ground."There's a website where anyone can buy an off the peg dating website that already has a database of members. The site sells the same list to everyone, 10 people buy the site, brand it with their own idea. Now all the sites are linked with the same members. New people join looking for A and are bombarded by people looking for B C D, X Y and Z. They're a scam. At least on Fab we have the veri system, so there's a strong chance you're chatting to a real person, looking for the same as you. And it's all fecking free.... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How's about the gold site supporters fee be increased to 30 quid for 30 days, that's a quid a day and I think it's worth it to be honest. If you supply photo ID ie drivers license or passport it's then reduced to 15 quid for 30 days If you supply both photo ID or drivers/passport and photo ID of face shot with the paper with writing on Then you are a higher rated member and your fee is 10 quid for 30 days ? Most people would leave. Particularly the single guys, who apparently are much in demand, although the anecdotal evidence suggests otherwise. Why would people pay so much to belong to a site where it was so difficult to get a meet? Where's the incentive? You think blokes attitudes, expectations and sense of entitlement are poor on a free site? Think about what their expectations would be on a site that cost £30 a month.
I've used a site where men had to pay quite a significant amount to be able to message women. It was a bit grim."I meant the same rules for everyone, no exceptions | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I have been on FAB for over a year , first as a single woman and now as a couple. I have had loads of meets and everyone has always been genuine and turned up as arranged. I have never encountered a fake, scammer or troll. I feel I'm missing out. Where am I going wrong? SallyS" Ask the OP. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How's about the gold site supporters fee be increased to 30 quid for 30 days, that's a quid a day and I think it's worth it to be honest. If you supply photo ID ie drivers license or passport it's then reduced to 15 quid for 30 days If you supply both photo ID or drivers/passport and photo ID of face shot with the paper with writing on Then you are a higher rated member and your fee is 10 quid for 30 days ? Most people would leave. Particularly the single guys, who apparently are much in demand, although the anecdotal evidence suggests otherwise. Why would people pay so much to belong to a site where it was so difficult to get a meet? Where's the incentive? You think blokes attitudes, expectations and sense of entitlement are poor on a free site? Think about what their expectations would be on a site that cost £30 a month.
I've used a site where men had to pay quite a significant amount to be able to message women. It was a bit grim.
I meant the same rules for everyone, no exceptions "Oh if I was having to pay that much, I'd be a right cunt to everyone. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How's about the gold site supporters fee be increased to 30 quid for 30 days, that's a quid a day and I think it's worth it to be honest. If you supply photo ID ie drivers license or passport it's then reduced to 15 quid for 30 days If you supply both photo ID or drivers/passport and photo ID of face shot with the paper with writing on Then you are a higher rated member and your fee is 10 quid for 30 days ? Most people would leave. Particularly the single guys, who apparently are much in demand, although the anecdotal evidence suggests otherwise. Why would people pay so much to belong to a site where it was so difficult to get a meet? Where's the incentive? You think blokes attitudes, expectations and sense of entitlement are poor on a free site? Think about what their expectations would be on a site that cost £30 a month.
I've used a site where men had to pay quite a significant amount to be able to message women. It was a bit grim.
I meant the same rules for everyone, no exceptions
Oh if I was having to pay that much, I'd be a right cunt to everyone." | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How's about the gold site supporters fee be increased to 30 quid for 30 days, that's a quid a day and I think it's worth it to be honest. If you supply photo ID ie drivers license or passport it's then reduced to 15 quid for 30 days If you supply both photo ID or drivers/passport and photo ID of face shot with the paper with writing on Then you are a higher rated member and your fee is 10 quid for 30 days ? Most people would leave. Particularly the single guys, who apparently are much in demand, although the anecdotal evidence suggests otherwise. Why would people pay so much to belong to a site where it was so difficult to get a meet? Where's the incentive? You think blokes attitudes, expectations and sense of entitlement are poor on a free site? Think about what their expectations would be on a site that cost £30 a month.
I've used a site where men had to pay quite a significant amount to be able to message women. It was a bit grim.
I meant the same rules for everyone, no exceptions
Oh if I was having to pay that much, I'd be a right cunt to everyone." | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How's about the gold site supporters fee be increased to 30 quid for 30 days, that's a quid a day and I think it's worth it to be honest. If you supply photo ID ie drivers license or passport it's then reduced to 15 quid for 30 days If you supply both photo ID or drivers/passport and photo ID of face shot with the paper with writing on Then you are a higher rated member and your fee is 10 quid for 30 days ? Most people would leave. Particularly the single guys, who apparently are much in demand, although the anecdotal evidence suggests otherwise. Why would people pay so much to belong to a site where it was so difficult to get a meet? Where's the incentive? You think blokes attitudes, expectations and sense of entitlement are poor on a free site? Think about what their expectations would be on a site that cost £30 a month.
I've used a site where men had to pay quite a significant amount to be able to message women. It was a bit grim.
I meant the same rules for everyone, no exceptions
Oh if I was having to pay that much, I'd be a right cunt to everyone."Money is just a material object for faked pleasure We got the Earth the wind and the trees | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"OP how do you feel it enhances your profile to repost the same photos on different days? SallyS" | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Haven't you seen the threads from those who have become silver or gold supporters and feeling aggrieved that it hasn't secured them a meet? You know why I'm a silver supporter? It's because your inbox "threads" messages, so I can remember what it is I've talked about to people. Sad, innit?
It's better than throwing a strop because you haven't had a meet. But then you've got women throwing their knickers at you and can turn us down because you've got so many options. "To be fair, nobody has ever thrown their knickers at me......but I live in hope... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Haven't you seen the threads from those who have become silver or gold supporters and feeling aggrieved that it hasn't secured them a meet? You know why I'm a silver supporter? It's because your inbox "threads" messages, so I can remember what it is I've talked about to people. Sad, innit?
It's better than throwing a strop because you haven't had a meet. But then you've got women throwing their knickers at you and can turn us down because you've got so many options.
To be fair, nobody has ever thrown their knickers at me......but I live in hope... "My arms were tired after hefting that hay. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How's about the gold site supporters fee be increased to 30 quid for 30 days, that's a quid a day and I think it's worth it to be honest. If you supply photo ID ie drivers license or passport it's then reduced to 15 quid for 30 days If you supply both photo ID or drivers/passport and photo ID of face shot with the paper with writing on Then you are a higher rated member and your fee is 10 quid for 30 days ? Most people would leave. Particularly the single guys, who apparently are much in demand, although the anecdotal evidence suggests otherwise. Why would people pay so much to belong to a site where it was so difficult to get a meet? Where's the incentive? You think blokes attitudes, expectations and sense of entitlement are poor on a free site? Think about what their expectations would be on a site that cost £30 a month.
I've used a site where men had to pay quite a significant amount to be able to message women. It was a bit grim."I've used a site like that too & the level of expectation from some of the men wasn't nice to deal with. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How's about the gold site supporters fee be increased to 30 quid for 30 days, that's a quid a day and I think it's worth it to be honest. If you supply photo ID ie drivers license or passport it's then reduced to 15 quid for 30 days If you supply both photo ID or drivers/passport and photo ID of face shot with the paper with writing on Then you are a higher rated member and your fee is 10 quid for 30 days ? Most people would leave. Particularly the single guys, who apparently are much in demand, although the anecdotal evidence suggests otherwise. Why would people pay so much to belong to a site where it was so difficult to get a meet? Where's the incentive? You think blokes attitudes, expectations and sense of entitlement are poor on a free site? Think about what their expectations would be on a site that cost £30 a month.
I've used a site where men had to pay quite a significant amount to be able to message women. It was a bit grim.
It wasn't P..y N.....y was it? What a bullshite site that was. They even tried to get me to pay so I could talk to a woman by taking women coming onto me . If not, as you were
No it wasn't...would have thought site-created fake female profiles would be a big risk on any paying sites though
It started off that these fake profiles would lure men back to the site when their membership was up. They'd renew but the women went to ground.
There's a website where anyone can buy an off the peg dating website that already has a database of members.
The site sells the same list to everyone, 10 people buy the site, brand it with their own idea. Now all the sites are linked with the same members.
New people join looking for A and are bombarded by people looking for B C D, X Y and Z.
They're a scam. At least on Fab we have the veri system, so there's a strong chance you're chatting to a real person, looking for the same as you.
And it's all fecking free...."This was prior to all that. I'm talking 8-10 years ago. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm a peace keeper just an idea "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K-WpxSrmV4Y | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm a peace keeper just an idea
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K-WpxSrmV4Y"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wd5dDc2xE3U | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We could all have to go to London, take photo ID and something official with our address on (from within the last 3 months), some photo both pics that can be cut out and laminated on FAB Genuine cards. We could then show our FAB Genuine cards on our profile or have a purple tick that shows we have one. I think this would work " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sorry OP but I don't agree. Thus has been raised by people on more than one occasion in the past. Tightening the rules on verification will not stop fakes or time wasters. Photo verification only verifies that thd profile is what the say it is, for example a couple or a single. It doesn't prove who they are or guarantee that they will meet. Nita " there is a woman over here with ropey photos , one of which on her private gallery is jessica rabbit.....I'll let that sink in . Jessica rabbit is the girlfriend of roger rabbit .....both are animated cartoons and do not exist in the real world . Fab okayed this photo ....so a photo is not neccessarily proof of who it claims to be . | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How's about the gold site supporters fee be increased to 30 quid for 30 days, that's a quid a day and I think it's worth it to be honest. If you supply photo ID ie drivers license or passport it's then reduced to 15 quid for 30 days If you supply both photo ID or drivers/passport and photo ID of face shot with the paper with writing on Then you are a higher rated member and your fee is 10 quid for 30 days ? Most people would leave. Particularly the single guys, who apparently are much in demand, although the anecdotal evidence suggests otherwise. Why would people pay so much to belong to a site where it was so difficult to get a meet? Where's the incentive? You think blokes attitudes, expectations and sense of entitlement are poor on a free site? Think about what their expectations would be on a site that cost £30 a month.
I've used a site where men had to pay quite a significant amount to be able to message women. It was a bit grim.
I meant the same rules for everyone, no exceptions
Oh if I was having to pay that much, I'd be a right cunt to everyone.
Money is just a material object for faked pleasure
We got the Earth the wind and the trees "I love trees. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Apparently if you leave milk out for them it gives them the shits trolls are lactose intolerant. Or is that hedgehogs? "Gold top, proper job! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How's about the gold site supporters fee be increased to 30 quid for 30 days, that's a quid a day and I think it's worth it to be honest. If you supply photo ID ie drivers license or passport it's then reduced to 15 quid for 30 days If you supply both photo ID or drivers/passport and photo ID of face shot with the paper with writing on Then you are a higher rated member and your fee is 10 quid for 30 days ? Most people would leave. Particularly the single guys, who apparently are much in demand, although the anecdotal evidence suggests otherwise. Why would people pay so much to belong to a site where it was so difficult to get a meet? Where's the incentive? You think blokes attitudes, expectations and sense of entitlement are poor on a free site? Think about what their expectations would be on a site that cost £30 a month.
I've used a site where men had to pay quite a significant amount to be able to message women. It was a bit grim."An understatement! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I have been on FAB for over a year , first as a single woman and now as a couple. I have had loads of meets and everyone has always been genuine and turned up as arranged. I have never encountered a fake, scammer or troll. I feel I'm missing out. Where am I going wrong? SallyS" How do you think I feel after seven years scammer, fake, troll and time waster free?!!  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We came off FAB a few months ago due to the number of fakes, scammers and trolls. Met a few nice genuine couples, although we found clubs to be more appealing to the genuine swingers. There still seems to be a large number of so called couples without photo verifications or any veries. Should the site set a time limit for couples to prove themselves, surely this would out the scammers . " Unfortunately, there will always be weirdos and scammers. I suppose this kind of site is a prime target. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Did we mention the site was terrible ??? Merely stating improvements could be made to stop fake accounts. Bloody hell keeping our opinions to ourselfs from now on ! " Your posting in the wrong section, you should have this in the "Site Feedback" section | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Apparently if you leave milk out for them it gives them the shits trolls are lactose intolerant. Or is that hedgehogs?
Gold top, proper job! "And always keep a gruff billy goat for added protection,trolls hate them! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How's about the gold site supporters fee be increased to 30 quid for 30 days, that's a quid a day and I think it's worth it to be honest. If you supply photo ID ie drivers license or passport it's then reduced to 15 quid for 30 days If you supply both photo ID or drivers/passport and photo ID of face shot with the paper with writing on Then you are a higher rated member and your fee is 10 quid for 30 days ? Most people would leave. Particularly the single guys, who apparently are much in demand, although the anecdotal evidence suggests otherwise. Why would people pay so much to belong to a site where it was so difficult to get a meet? Where's the incentive? You think blokes attitudes, expectations and sense of entitlement are poor on a free site? Think about what their expectations would be on a site that cost £30 a month.
I've used a site where men had to pay quite a significant amount to be able to message women. It was a bit grim.
An understatement! "I wouldnt pay £1 day or £350 a year and I dont think most of the most serious swingers would either. Bur agree it would certainly get rid of the fakes and trolls. You do make a good point that the site is free and therefore maybe we should have realistic expectaions of the site. But I certainly wouldnt give and info such as drivers licence or passport to anyone on the internet. My own felling is that I dont take anyone without convincing veris and at least a silver site supporter seriously. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If I were dumb enough to keep arranging meets with people who never turn up, you know those profiles which disappear every other week, have web pics, never receive a veri etc. That the fault is mine. I can't really bitch and moan about fakes and timewasters when this site gives me tool to help myself but I don't use them or even a touch of common sense, now can I?" Agree but I have come across members with multiple log ins both as couples and also as the opposite sex with self verifications which are therefore ficticiuos. And as for photos on profiles, well they could be of anybody | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If I were dumb enough to keep arranging meets with people who never turn up, you know those profiles which disappear every other week, have web pics, never receive a veri etc. That the fault is mine. I can't really bitch and moan about fakes and timewasters when this site gives me tool to help myself but I don't use them or even a touch of common sense, now can I? Agree but I have come across members with multiple log ins both as couples and also as the opposite sex with self verifications which are therefore ficticiuos. And as for photos on profiles, well they could be of anybody" If you see any profiles you feel are suspect report them to Admin. They have the tools to investigate. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Did we mention the site was terrible ??? Merely stating improvements could be made to stop fake accounts. Bloody hell keeping our opinions to ourselfs from now on ! I think people came to the conclusion you thought the site was bad because you stated that you left the site because of the trolls etc. Of course you can give your opinion but so can others. Posting a thread to have people agree with you and validate your position only really works with threads about cake and biscuits (even then *someone* will be along to tell you to have an apple instead). If you actually want a discussion then sensibly counter what others are saying. Cake you say........ "No! Have an apple! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We came off FAB a few months ago due to the number of fakes, scammers and trolls. Met a few nice genuine couples, although we found clubs to be more appealing to the genuine swingers. There still seems to be a large number of so called couples without photo verifications or any veries. Should the site set a time limit for couples to prove themselves, surely this would out the scammers . " What time limit, say 3 months? You could just avoid profiles with no verifications that had been here more than 3 months.
There are people on here that have many verifications and used to meet but don't now- maybe their wife left them for example. The only way to avoid such people is to do your own sleuthing. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The only way to avoid such people is to do your own sleuthing. " Yep thats half the fun! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The site has pretty much no interest in stopping fake profiles. Ultimately the more active accounts the better. That's why there is no POL, no email verification, no IP blocking of profiles that have been removed multiple times. The more active profiles, the higher any potential revenue. " Good point and we'll made. Do you have any idea how much profit the site makes from free memberships? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The site has pretty much no interest in stopping fake profiles. Ultimately the more active accounts the better. That's why there is no POL, no email verification, no IP blocking of profiles that have been removed multiple times. The more active profiles, the higher any potential revenue. Good point and we'll made. Do you have any idea how much profit the site makes from free memberships? " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How's about the gold site supporters fee be increased to 30 quid for 30 days, that's a quid a day and I think it's worth it to be honest. If you supply photo ID ie drivers license or passport it's then reduced to 15 quid for 30 days If you supply both photo ID or drivers/passport and photo ID of face shot with the paper with writing on Then you are a higher rated member and your fee is 10 quid for 30 days ? " How stupid do you have to be to do that? Do you think, given Identify theft, etc, that anyone with more than two brain cells would give a random website a copy of a passport or driving license? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How's about the gold site supporters fee be increased to 30 quid for 30 days, that's a quid a day and I think it's worth it to be honest. If you supply photo ID ie drivers license or passport it's then reduced to 15 quid for 30 days If you supply both photo ID or drivers/passport and photo ID of face shot with the paper with writing on Then you are a higher rated member and your fee is 10 quid for 30 days ? Most people would leave. Particularly the single guys, who apparently are much in demand, although the anecdotal evidence suggests otherwise. Why would people pay so much to belong to a site where it was so difficult to get a meet? Where's the incentive? You think blokes attitudes, expectations and sense of entitlement are poor on a free site? Think about what their expectations would be on a site that cost £30 a month.
I've used a site where men had to pay quite a significant amount to be able to message women. It was a bit grim.
An understatement!
I wouldnt pay £1 day or £350 a year and I dont think most of the most serious swingers would either. Bur agree it would certainly get rid of the fakes and trolls.
You do make a good point that the site is free and therefore maybe we should have realistic expectaions of the site. But I certainly wouldnt give and info such as drivers licence or passport to anyone on the internet.
My own felling is that I dont take anyone without convincing veris and at least a silver site supporter seriously."Yeah because timewasters, fakes and scammers don't have money!
We all have our own filter system, but for me it's my own personal judgement. I can't imagine what weight the _iews of a total strangers could have for me in deciding who to invite into my home for sex!
I have friends who I trust and respect who have nothing but good to say about someone we all know. Someone who hasn't done a single thing to offend me in anyway, who hasn't said anything negative about anyone, in fact a decent person but my spirit doesn't take to her. My own gut feeling says there's something off about her, but no one has a bad word to say about her.
I go with my gut everytime: not failed me yet! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The site has pretty much no interest in stopping fake profiles. Ultimately the more active accounts the better. That's why there is no POL, no email verification, no IP blocking of profiles that have been removed multiple times. The more active profiles, the higher any potential revenue. Good point and we'll made. Do you have any idea how much profit the site makes from free memberships? " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The site has pretty much no interest in stopping fake profiles. Ultimately the more active accounts the better. That's why there is no POL, no email verification, no IP blocking of profiles that have been removed multiple times. The more active profiles, the higher any potential revenue. Good point and we'll made. Do you have any idea how much profit the site makes from free memberships? "The more traffic a site has increases its googleability (used to know correct term ). In turn this increases potential members and hence potential paid membership. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The site has pretty much no interest in stopping fake profiles. Ultimately the more active accounts the better. That's why there is no POL, no email verification, no IP blocking of profiles that have been removed multiple times. The more active profiles, the higher any potential revenue. Good point and we'll made. Do you have any idea how much profit the site makes from free memberships?
The more traffic a site has increases its googleability (used to know correct term ).
In turn this increases potential members and hence potential paid membership."What paid membership? It's a free site. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The site has pretty much no interest in stopping fake profiles. Ultimately the more active accounts the better. That's why there is no POL, no email verification, no IP blocking of profiles that have been removed multiple times. The more active profiles, the higher any potential revenue. Good point and we'll made. Do you have any idea how much profit the site makes from free memberships?
The more traffic a site has increases its googleability (used to know correct term ). In turn this increases potential members and hence potential paid membership."Out of interest, how much profit does Fab make from your "paid" membership? (I know the answer to this question) People are always moaning that Fab needs this that and the other. What it actually needs more than anything is a facepalm emoji. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The site has pretty much no interest in stopping fake profiles. Ultimately the more active accounts the better. That's why there is no POL, no email verification, no IP blocking of profiles that have been removed multiple times. The more active profiles, the higher any potential revenue. Good point and we'll made. Do you have any idea how much profit the site makes from free memberships?
The more traffic a site has increases its googleability (used to know correct term ). In turn this increases potential members and hence potential paid membership.
Out of interest, how much profit does Fab make from your "paid" membership? (I know the answer to this question)
"not a penny, zero | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The site has pretty much no interest in stopping fake profiles. Ultimately the more active accounts the better. That's why there is no POL, no email verification, no IP blocking of profiles that have been removed multiple times. The more active profiles, the higher any potential revenue. Good point and we'll made. Do you have any idea how much profit the site makes from free memberships?
The more traffic a site has increases its googleability (used to know correct term ).
In turn this increases potential members and hence potential paid membership.
What paid membership?
It's a free site.
"Oh use your brain - one has the choice to upgrade. Silver and gold = paid membership. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Site traffic does not effect Google search rankings. Hence why Google makes tonnes of cash from pay per click advertising. Anyway I digress. People Really need to up their filters. Pay out that little bit more, know the right people and get yourself the platinum membership. You then filter trolls, see others messages and push yourself higher on searches by genuine users. Platinum is the way to go." Like I said, I've forgotten the term. Increased traffic is beneficial to sites ( this is prob a reason why threads are limited to 175 and then repeated). | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The site has pretty much no interest in stopping fake profiles. Ultimately the more active accounts the better. That's why there is no POL, no email verification, no IP blocking of profiles that have been removed multiple times. The more active profiles, the higher any potential revenue. Good point and we'll made. Do you have any idea how much profit the site makes from free memberships?
The more traffic a site has increases its googleability (used to know correct term ). In turn this increases potential members and hence potential paid membership.
Out of interest, how much profit does Fab make from your "paid" membership? (I know the answer to this question)
People are always moaning that Fab needs this that and the other.
What it actually needs more than anything is a facepalm emoji.
"Yawn | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The site has pretty much no interest in stopping fake profiles. Ultimately the more active accounts the better. That's why there is no POL, no email verification, no IP blocking of profiles that have been removed multiple times. The more active profiles, the higher any potential revenue. Good point and we'll made. Do you have any idea how much profit the site makes from free memberships?
The more traffic a site has increases its googleability (used to know correct term ). In turn this increases potential members and hence potential paid membership.
Out of interest, how much profit does Fab make from your "paid" membership? (I know the answer to this question)
not a penny, zero"Running costs are taken from MEMBERSHIP fees. You know, the ones who have chosen to upgrade. If there is anything left, it's profit. Can we have an Einstein emoji? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The site has pretty much no interest in stopping fake profiles. Ultimately the more active accounts the better. That's why there is no POL, no email verification, no IP blocking of profiles that have been removed multiple times. The more active profiles, the higher any potential revenue. Good point and we'll made. Do you have any idea how much profit the site makes from free memberships?
The more traffic a site has increases its googleability (used to know correct term ).
In turn this increases potential members and hence potential paid membership.
What paid membership?
It's a free site.
Oh use your brain - one has the choice to upgrade. Silver and gold = paid membership."I see the irony even if you don't. How much do you/did you pay to join? Silver and Gold are not membership requirements are they? I'll say it again for the hard of thinking, it's a free site. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We came off FAB a few months ago due to the number of fakes, scammers and trolls. Met a few nice genuine couples, although we found clubs to be more appealing to the genuine swingers. There still seems to be a large number of so called couples without photo verifications or any veries. Should the site set a time limit for couples to prove themselves, surely this would out the scammers . " I think members who are verified by people who have met them on a previous profile, should be suspended from Fab. That counts as a false verification surely? If you delete your profile you should start from scratch and not get people to verify you you have met before on another profile, if you get my drift OP. Could just be one half of the previous profile playing now. Are you photo verified? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The site has pretty much no interest in stopping fake profiles. Ultimately the more active accounts the better. That's why there is no POL, no email verification, no IP blocking of profiles that have been removed multiple times. The more active profiles, the higher any potential revenue. Good point and we'll made. Do you have any idea how much profit the site makes from free memberships?
The more traffic a site has increases its googleability (used to know correct term ).
In turn this increases potential members and hence potential paid membership.
What paid membership?
It's a free site.
Oh use your brain - one has the choice to upgrade. Silver and gold = paid membership.
I see the irony even if you don't.
How much do you/did you pay to join?
Silver and Gold are not membership requirements are they?
I'll say it again for the hard of thinking, it's a free site."Have I disagreed it's a free site? Have I stated I pay when I don't? What part of POTENTIAL paid membership is not clear? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We came off FAB a few months ago due to the number of fakes, scammers and trolls. Met a few nice genuine couples, although we found clubs to be more appealing to the genuine swingers. There still seems to be a large number of so called couples without photo verifications or any veries. Should the site set a time limit for couples to prove themselves, surely this would out the scammers . I think members who are verified by people who have met them on a previous profile, should be suspended from Fab. That counts as a false verification surely? If you delete your profile you should start from scratch and not get people to verify you you have met before on another profile, if you get my drift OP. Could just be one half of the previous profile playing now. Are you photo verified? " Why is that a false verification? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We came off FAB a few months ago due to the number of fakes, scammers and trolls. Met a few nice genuine couples, although we found clubs to be more appealing to the genuine swingers. There still seems to be a large number of so called couples without photo verifications or any veries. Should the site set a time limit for couples to prove themselves, surely this would out the scammers . I think members who are verified by people who have met them on a previous profile, should be suspended from Fab. That counts as a false verification surely? If you delete your profile you should start from scratch and not get people to verify you you have met before on another profile, if you get my drift OP. Could just be one half of the previous profile playing now. Are you photo verified? " No i dont see that as a false verification. Previous profile or not it shows they are a real person who showed up. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We came off FAB a few months ago due to the number of fakes, scammers and trolls. Met a few nice genuine couples, although we found clubs to be more appealing to the genuine swingers. There still seems to be a large number of so called couples without photo verifications or any veries. Should the site set a time limit for couples to prove themselves, surely this would out the scammers . I think members who are verified by people who have met them on a previous profile, should be suspended from Fab. That counts as a false verification surely? If you delete your profile you should start from scratch and not get people to verify you you have met before on another profile, if you get my drift OP. Could just be one half of the previous profile playing now. Are you photo verified? No i dont see that as a false verification. Previous profile or not it shows they are a real person who showed up. "My thoughts exactly. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We came off FAB a few months ago due to the number of fakes, scammers and trolls. Met a few nice genuine couples, although we found clubs to be more appealing to the genuine swingers. There still seems to be a large number of so called couples without photo verifications or any veries. Should the site set a time limit for couples to prove themselves, surely this would out the scammers . I think members who are verified by people who have met them on a previous profile, should be suspended from Fab. That counts as a false verification surely? If you delete your profile you should start from scratch and not get people to verify you you have met before on another profile, if you get my drift OP. Could just be one half of the previous profile playing now. Are you photo verified? No i dont see that as a false verification. Previous profile or not it shows they are a real person who showed up.
My thoughts exactly. "My first verifications on original profile were from folk i know in the real world, and have done for years, i guess some people veiw them as fake too! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We came off FAB a few months ago due to the number of fakes, scammers and trolls. Met a few nice genuine couples, although we found clubs to be more appealing to the genuine swingers. There still seems to be a large number of so called couples without photo verifications or any veries. Should the site set a time limit for couples to prove themselves, surely this would out the scammers . I think members who are verified by people who have met them on a previous profile, should be suspended from Fab. That counts as a false verification surely? If you delete your profile you should start from scratch and not get people to verify you you have met before on another profile, if you get my drift OP. Could just be one half of the previous profile playing now. Are you photo verified? No i dont see that as a false verification. Previous profile or not it shows they are a real person who showed up.
My thoughts exactly.
My first verifications on original profile were from folk i know in the real world, and have done for years, i guess some people veiw them as fake too! "Fab needs two new emojis; facepalm and shrugs shoulders?????. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The site has pretty much no interest in stopping fake profiles. Ultimately the more active accounts the better. That's why there is no POL, no email verification, no IP blocking of profiles that have been removed multiple times. The more active profiles, the higher any potential revenue. Good point and we'll made. Do you have any idea how much profit the site makes from free memberships?
The more traffic a site has increases its googleability (used to know correct term ).
In turn this increases potential members and hence potential paid membership.
What paid membership?
It's a free site.
Oh use your brain - one has the choice to upgrade. Silver and gold = paid membership.
I see the irony even if you don't.
How much do you/did you pay to join?
Silver and Gold are not membership requirements are they?
I'll say it again for the hard of thinking, it's a free site.
Have I disagreed it's a free site? Have I stated I pay when I don't? What part of POTENTIAL paid membership is not clear?"Ok. I see what you are both saying so I will spell I out to stop the silliness. Membership is free. Being a supporter of the site and getting access to additional benefits is optional. Those supporting the site cover the running and development costs. Things that people 'demand' and kick-off about are done by volunteers (photo approval, for instance). Theads are limited in length, I believe, to save server space. Yes, threads get repeated but that happens with threads with just two posts on them. Clear now? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We came off FAB a few months ago due to the number of fakes, scammers and trolls. Met a few nice genuine couples, although we found clubs to be more appealing to the genuine swingers. There still seems to be a large number of so called couples without photo verifications or any veries. Should the site set a time limit for couples to prove themselves, surely this would out the scammers . I think members who are verified by people who have met them on a previous profile, should be suspended from Fab. That counts as a false verification surely? If you delete your profile you should start from scratch and not get people to verify you you have met before on another profile, if you get my drift OP. Could just be one half of the previous profile playing now. Are you photo verified? No i dont see that as a false verification. Previous profile or not it shows they are a real person who showed up.
My thoughts exactly.
My first verifications on original profile were from folk i know in the real world, and have done for years, i guess some people veiw them as fake too! "I've met you and know you to be fake. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The site has pretty much no interest in stopping fake profiles. Ultimately the more active accounts the better. That's why there is no POL, no email verification, no IP blocking of profiles that have been removed multiple times. The more active profiles, the higher any potential revenue. Good point and we'll made. Do you have any idea how much profit the site makes from free memberships?
The more traffic a site has increases its googleability (used to know correct term ).
In turn this increases potential members and hence potential paid membership.
What paid membership?
It's a free site.
Oh use your brain - one has the choice to upgrade. Silver and gold = paid membership.
I see the irony even if you don't.
How much do you/did you pay to join?
Silver and Gold are not membership requirements are they?
I'll say it again for the hard of thinking, it's a free site.
Have I disagreed it's a free site? Have I stated I pay when I don't? What part of POTENTIAL paid membership is not clear?
Ok. I see what you are both saying so I will spell I out to stop the silliness.
Membership is free.
Being a supporter of the site and getting access to additional benefits is optional. Those supporting the site cover the running and development costs. Things that people 'demand' and kick-off about are done by volunteers (photo approval, for instance).
Theads are limited in length, I believe, to save server space. Yes, threads get repeated but that happens with threads with just two posts on them.
Clear now?"It was always clear to me Lickety. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We came off FAB a few months ago due to the number of fakes, scammers and trolls. Met a few nice genuine couples, although we found clubs to be more appealing to the genuine swingers. There still seems to be a large number of so called couples without photo verifications or any veries. Should the site set a time limit for couples to prove themselves, surely this would out the scammers . I think members who are verified by people who have met them on a previous profile, should be suspended from Fab. That counts as a false verification surely? If you delete your profile you should start from scratch and not get people to verify you you have met before on another profile, if you get my drift OP. Could just be one half of the previous profile playing now. Are you photo verified? " A verification is purely to show people have met. Who cares if its from a previous profile? My first verification was from someone I'd met on another site - does that make our meeting less true? I will admit I get jaundiced with guys who keep leaving then asking me for a verification when they re-join. I don't mind one or two but there have been guys leaving 4 or 5 times asking. Make up your bloody minds!! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We came off FAB a few months ago due to the number of fakes, scammers and trolls. Met a few nice genuine couples, although we found clubs to be more appealing to the genuine swingers. There still seems to be a large number of so called couples without photo verifications or any veries. Should the site set a time limit for couples to prove themselves, surely this would out the scammers . I think members who are verified by people who have met them on a previous profile, should be suspended from Fab. That counts as a false verification surely? If you delete your profile you should start from scratch and not get people to verify you you have met before on another profile, if you get my drift OP. Could just be one half of the previous profile playing now. Are you photo verified? A verification is purely to show people have met. Who cares if its from a previous profile? My first verification was from someone I'd met on another site - does that make our meeting less true? I will admit I get jaundiced with guys who keep leaving then asking me for a verification when they re-join. I don't mind one or two but there have been guys leaving 4 or 5 times asking. Make up your bloody minds!!" Next time leave them a verification that says they are only here on a short visit but will be back soon. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The site has pretty much no interest in stopping fake profiles. Ultimately the more active accounts the better. That's why there is no POL, no email verification, no IP blocking of profiles that have been removed multiple times. The more active profiles, the higher any potential revenue. Good point and we'll made. Do you have any idea how much profit the site makes from free memberships?
The more traffic a site has increases its googleability (used to know correct term ).
In turn this increases potential members and hence potential paid membership.
What paid membership?
It's a free site.
Oh use your brain - one has the choice to upgrade. Silver and gold = paid membership.
I see the irony even if you don't.
How much do you/did you pay to join?
Silver and Gold are not membership requirements are they?
I'll say it again for the hard of thinking, it's a free site.
Have I disagreed it's a free site? Have I stated I pay when I don't? What part of POTENTIAL paid membership is not clear?
Ok. I see what you are both saying so I will spell I out to stop the silliness.
Membership is free.
Being a supporter of the site and getting access to additional benefits is optional. Those supporting the site cover the running and development costs. Things that people 'demand' and kick-off about are done by volunteers (photo approval, for instance).
Theads are limited in length, I believe, to save server space. Yes, threads get repeated but that happens with threads with just two posts on them.
Clear now?"Site supporter = upgraded membership. I merely jumped in when Markoh was using sarcasm to a previous poster who hadn't posted anything inaccurate imo. I just think the continued posts are to save face. As for server limitations, I have no knowledge. I do have knowledge, albeit very limited, about high traffic being beneficial to website owners/administrators. Thank you for your mediation though  .
Back to the original point in question? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We came off FAB a few months ago due to the number of fakes, scammers and trolls. Met a few nice genuine couples, although we found clubs to be more appealing to the genuine swingers. There still seems to be a large number of so called couples without photo verifications or any veries. Should the site set a time limit for couples to prove themselves, surely this would out the scammers . I think members who are verified by people who have met them on a previous profile, should be suspended from Fab. That counts as a false verification surely? If you delete your profile you should start from scratch and not get people to verify you you have met before on another profile, if you get my drift OP. Could just be one half of the previous profile playing now. Are you photo verified? No i dont see that as a false verification. Previous profile or not it shows they are a real person who showed up.
My thoughts exactly.
My first verifications on original profile were from folk i know in the real world, and have done for years, i guess some people veiw them as fake too!
I've met you and know you to be fake. "Shhhhh dont out me! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We came off FAB a few months ago due to the number of fakes, scammers and trolls. Met a few nice genuine couples, although we found clubs to be more appealing to the genuine swingers. There still seems to be a large number of so called couples without photo verifications or any veries. Should the site set a time limit for couples to prove themselves, surely this would out the scammers . I think members who are verified by people who have met them on a previous profile, should be suspended from Fab. That counts as a false verification surely? If you delete your profile you should start from scratch and not get people to verify you you have met before on another profile, if you get my drift OP. Could just be one half of the previous profile playing now. Are you photo verified? No i dont see that as a false verification. Previous profile or not it shows they are a real person who showed up.
My thoughts exactly.
My first verifications on original profile were from folk i know in the real world, and have done for years, i guess some people veiw them as fake too!
I've met you and know you to be fake.
Shhhhh dont out me! "It's ok, I'm fake too. That's how I spotted it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We had our profile for about 6 months before we really started using it. We now play about once a month and have a great work of friends who we've through Fab. I guess if Fab had closed our profile for not using it at first, we could have started another one. That being said, we don't really understand why people have so many difficulties with ing out fakes and timewasters. We block unverified profile from messaging us, so to us they are not there. " What sort of people are you, using the tools the site offers? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
