FabSwingers.com forum: Paying for fab membership

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

I think that fab should become a chargeable site.

I honestly think that a standard fee of lets keep it at £5 for that little gold and silver badge would push so many time wasters out. The type that treats it more like Facebook than Facebook. I was on a site that was £16 pound a month and it was a breath of fresh air.

Views?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Timewasters have fivers too

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

You can always block messages from non-site supporters, so where is the problem and how is your time being wasted?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ordonBennettMan
over a year ago

dover

"I think that fab should become a chargeable site.

Views?

I think timewasters can afford to pay for membership

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *odareyouMan
over a year ago

not far from iceland,,,,,, tescos is nearer though :-) (near leeds)

"I think that fab should become a chargeable site.

Views?

Why jon here if the chargeable site was so much better.?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I think that fab should become a chargeable site.

Views?

Really ?

Should I be surprised or not at the many who don't support the site, and get it for free

A fiver for 60 days is a piffling amount to pay.

But no fee would deter the morons and cockwombles.

I used to moderate on another adult site and they charged single guys £30 a month, and you got just as many knob heads on there as you do here

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

do you not think a fee, not necessarily £5 would remedy some members dislikes?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"I think that fab should become a chargeable site.

Views?

Why jon here if the chargeable site was so much better.?

I'm still a member there but was originally here

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I think that fab should become a chargeable site.

Views?

Thought of going back to your £16 per month site then?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I think that fab should become a chargeable site.

Views?

Why jon here if the chargeable site was so much better.?

Just what I was wondering

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

16 quid a month would be a struggle for some of us

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"You can always block messages from non-site supporters, so where is the problem and how is your time being wasted? "

This exactly.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Im not meeting and im a gold member

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *odareyouMan
over a year ago

not far from iceland,,,,,, tescos is nearer though :-) (near leeds)

"I think that fab should become a chargeable site.

Views?

Why jon here if the chargeable site was so much better.?

I'm still a member there but was originally here"

Ahhh. The 'I was on a site that was £16 a month and it was a breath of fresh air ' statement lead me to thinkl of the past tense ..

if that site is better stick with that and enjoy

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *litheroevoyeurMan
over a year ago

Clitheroe

"do you not think a fee, not necessarily £5 would remedy some members dislikes?"

A recent survey showed that about 40% of chatroom users were either silver or gold supporters.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

East Sussex

I think that making it a pay to join site might deter some time wasters but I think they would be replaced by people who think that because they've paid they're entitled to sex.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

We wouldn't have joined fab if we were forced to pay for it, we used it and decided to become site supporters after success in meeting people here, we don't use SDC anymore because you have to pay for it and it isn't worth the money for the number of meets we get from it. Whereas we are happy to pay to fab because we continue to use it and get successful meets from it. We weren't time wasters before we paid for it and I imagine alot of others aren't.. we have had our time wasted by paying verified members before.. it means nothing really but we wanted to show our support to keep the site running.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I've been on a site where men had to pay & the level of expectation that created at times wasn't pleasant.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

No I don't think it would be better, the free membership is what attracted me to this site in the first place. If I had to pay £5 just to join the site I wouldn't be here.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Im not meeting and im a gold member

Such a shame

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"No I don't think it would be better, the free membership is what attracted me to this site in the first place. If I had to pay £5 just to join the site I wouldn't be here."

Snap

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I think that fab should become a chargeable site.

(

Views?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I think that fab should become a chargeable site.

Views?

Do you own fab?

This is absolute nonsense. I used to be a member of an expensive site. Just the same percentage of timewasters. Taxing things doesn't make them better. It just means someone makes more money.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I think that fab should become a chargeable site.

Views?

With facebook you get bared for showing nudity even if you have a closed group people would report you still . At least i can get my cock out without any bother on here

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ivemeyoursoulWoman
over a year ago

Easter just around the corner!

I'm thinking that £16 site wasn't that great really was it! I've been on one of those sites where the guy's paid around £30,for the women it was free and the men still moaned about women not meeting and time wasters.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Can buy a whole chicken and a pack of Yorkshire puddings for a fiver, I'll keep my fiver and use the site for free!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *BWcpl49Couple
over a year ago

Reading

"I think that fab should become a chargeable site.

Views?

Wont matter how much it costs timewasters are everywhere unfortunately, all you have to do is block them I think what they do now is fine having the site supporter option

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ikeC81Man
over a year ago

harrow

I would probably not use then site if it was to cost more than a fiver a month

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ee VianteWoman
over a year ago

Somewhere in North Norfolk

"I think that fab should become a chargeable site.

Views?

Do you think that charging women and couples to be here would make more of them want to fuck you?

Do you think it would encourage more women/couples that want to fuck you onto the site?

Possibly it might be a little easier to find those people but I don't think it would increase your pool of potential meets, so it wouldn't help your success rate.

Arguably it would mean fewer women/couples that want to fuck you on the site, because many wouldn't join if they had to pay, making it even harder for you to find meets. There's also the chance that there would be more pushy, entitled men here and that would drive some women/couples off the site.

I certainly think any effect on the ease of finding meets would be more than eclipsed by the overall reduction of women/couples on the site.

I don't think it would make things better for you, or the majority of other members.

It *may* cut down on those who keep creating new accounts so they can contact someone they are harassing or stalking, but those people are in the minority anyway.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Surely if blokes (as mentioned above about other sites only charging men) were to pay a membership would thus create a bit more 'bullying' tactics if they couldn't get meets? Because they pay a premium and would 'expect' a meet?

How many signed up just for a month and thought 'well this is a waste of my £20+, didn't get one shag from it. I'd like to see the amount of people that would pay that kind of money EACH month to not gain from it? I'm guessing a vast majority cancelled the DD after one month.

Both Ads and I were supporters before we closed our accounts, we aren't here to meet but if this was a chargeable site, I'm not so sure we would pay now as we don't use it in that way

G x

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Can buy a whole chicken and a pack of Yorkshire puddings for a fiver, I'll keep my fiver and use the site for free!"

A PACK of yorkshire puddings?

Blocked.

(not really)

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"I think that fab should become a chargeable site.

Views?

Thought of going back to your £16 per month site then?"

I'm still doing that

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"16 quid a month would be a struggle for some of us "

Which I appreciate hence I never threw in that amount

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"I think that fab should become a chargeable site.

Views?

Why jon here if the chargeable site was so much better.?

I'm still a member there but was originally here

Ahhh. The 'I was on a site that was £16 a month and it was a breath of fresh air ' statement lead me to thinkl of the past tense ..

if that site is better stick with that and enjoy

I use both I just think it would make fab more productive on all accounts

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"I think that making it a pay to join site might deter some time wasters but I think they would be replaced by people who think that because they've paid they're entitled to sex."

I find it works well. Etiquette is adhered to

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"We wouldn't have joined fab if we were forced to pay for it, we used it and decided to become site supporters after success in meeting people here, we don't use SDC anymore because you have to pay for it and it isn't worth the money for the number of meets we get from it. Whereas we are happy to pay to fab because we continue to use it and get successful meets from it. We weren't time wasters before we paid for it and I imagine alot of others aren't.. we have had our time wasted by paying verified members before.. it means nothing really but we wanted to show our support to keep the site running. "

I've done ok on sdc

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Can buy a whole chicken and a pack of Yorkshire puddings for a fiver, I'll keep my fiver and use the site for free!

A PACK of yorkshire puddings?

Blocked.

(not really)"

I've on my this year started doing my own Sunday dinners, I've mastered the cooking of meat, the making real gravy, the perfect roast potatoes. Yorkshires from scratch will come in time! I like aunt Bessie's ones anyway!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Only* that was meant to say!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ee VianteWoman
over a year ago

Somewhere in North Norfolk

"I think that fab should become a chargeable site.

Views?

Thought of going back to your £16 per month site then?

I'm still doing that"

You said "I was on..." not "I am on...".

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Duck of the Bay - you mentioned "Cockwombles".....

Now I used to be a big fan and I well remember Orinoco, Wellington, Uncle Bulgaria, Madame Cholet. But CockWombles? No, must have missed that episode...

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ee VianteWoman
over a year ago

Somewhere in North Norfolk

"I think that making it a pay to join site might deter some time wasters but I think they would be replaced by people who think that because they've paid they're entitled to sex.

I find it works well. Etiquette is adhered to "

As a man, though, you're unlikely to be aware of how other men behave towards women/couples there.

Men on here show often on here than many have absolutely no clue about the experiences women have on the site. A lot of people seem to assume everyone is like them.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I think that fab should become a chargeable site.

Views?

"
so yer saying in a time waster because i dont pay for it.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Hell no! I was a highly active member of Alt in the past - met my fella on there, ran a blog, chatted in the chatrooms and forums every day. Yeah, it's a dating site so slightly different, but at the end of the day I still came across a similar number of pillocks, despite, or perhaps because of the fee. That was pay for some...but you could still read blogs, _iew profiles and wink (so pay members could mail you back if they liked your profile), and go on most of the chatrooms. Much like here in many ways.

When looking to get back to it when my OH and I decided to play outside the lines, I found it was now pay for everything. Want to see more than a thumbnail? Get a subscription. Want to _iew a blogpost? Get a subscription. Want to chat to your friends? You get the picture. Needless to say, I didn't rejoin.

The only thing that charging for everything here would do is price out those who can't afford it. I couldn't care less if the person I meet is a farm labourer or a fancy lawyer...but you'd price out at least one of those. (Given the current state of the legal profession, I wouldn't be so quick to assume which either

)

I'm a gold supporter too so I'm not trying to save my own skin here. But yeah, this place goes down that route and I'm orf!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ee VianteWoman
over a year ago

Somewhere in North Norfolk

"I think that fab should become a chargeable site.

Views?

so yer saying in a time waster because i dont pay for it.

No, he's saying if you were forced to pay for it, we could be sure (or more sure) you, and everyone else here, wouldn't be timewasters.

Not all those who don't pay are timewasters but all timewasters don't pay. According to the OP.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I've been on sites that charge in excess of £30 a month.

The amount of fakes and timewasters on them is beyond comprehension.

Fab is a breath of fresh air compared to 99% of other sites.

As a single male I don't get many meets, so paying £10 £20 or £30 a month wouldn't encourage me to stay, it wouldn't be worth it.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ranny-CrumpetWoman
over a year ago

The Town by The Cross

"do you not think a fee, not necessarily £5 would remedy some members dislikes?"

No.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"I think that making it a pay to join site might deter some time wasters but I think they would be replaced by people who think that because they've paid they're entitled to sex.

I find it works well. Etiquette is adhered to

As a man, though, you're unlikely to be aware of how other men behave towards women/couples there.

Men on here show often on here than many have absolutely no clue about the experiences women have on the site. A lot of people seem to assume everyone is like them."

I've been told by single ladies and couples

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"I think that making it a pay to join site might deter some time wasters but I think they would be replaced by people who think that because they've paid they're entitled to sex.

I find it works well. Etiquette is adhered to

As a man, though, you're unlikely to be aware of how other men behave towards women/couples there.

Men on here show often on here than many have absolutely no clue about the experiences women have on the site. A lot of people seem to assume everyone is like them.

I've been told by single ladies and couples

Ps that's not aimed at every fella

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ady LickWoman
over a year ago

Northampton Somewhere

If I had to pay more than I do for this site I wouldn't be here!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ee VianteWoman
over a year ago

Somewhere in North Norfolk

"I think that making it a pay to join site might deter some time wasters but I think they would be replaced by people who think that because they've paid they're entitled to sex.

I find it works well. Etiquette is adhered to

As a man, though, you're unlikely to be aware of how other men behave towards women/couples there.

Men on here show often on here than many have absolutely no clue about the experiences women have on the site. A lot of people seem to assume everyone is like them.

I've been told by single ladies and couples

Well then you should have stuck with the site you "were" a member of then, because it sounds as though it works differently from every swinging site that charges than any other person who has commented (here and on similar threads in the past) has ever experienced.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I've been a site supporter in the past. It just makes it easier to stay under the radar due to having the option of hiding your veri's (if you have any) and not showing up on certain searches.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *iewMan
Forum Mod
over a year ago

Angus & Findhorn

I give £5, I take out more enjoyment

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ee VianteWoman
over a year ago

Somewhere in North Norfolk

"I give £5, I take out more enjoyment

Would you enjoy it more if everyone had to pay £5 though?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *iewMan
Forum Mod
over a year ago

Angus & Findhorn

"I give £5, I take out more enjoyment

Would you enjoy it more if everyone had to pay £5 though?"

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *iamondsmiles.Woman
over a year ago

little house on the praire

So why did you leave there then knowing you where coming to a free site which would have more people that are not serious on

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ee VianteWoman
over a year ago

Somewhere in North Norfolk

"So why did you leave there then knowing you where coming to a free site which would have more people that are not serious on"

He didn't, apparently, despite saying he "was" a member.

Something smells a bit off with the claims the OP is making tbh, based on my experiences and everything I've heard from other site members.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ulfilthmentMan
over a year ago

Just around the corner

"I was on a site that was £16 pound a month and it was a breath of fresh air."

And yet here you are?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *uzy444Woman
over a year ago

in the suffolk countryside

"I think that fab should become a chargeable site.

Views?

Why jon here if the chargeable site was so much better.?

I'm still a member there but was originally here

Ahhh. The 'I was on a site that was £16 a month and it was a breath of fresh air ' statement lead me to thinkl of the past tense ..

if that site is better stick with that and enjoy

I use both I just think it would make fab more productive on all accounts

"
..productive? what do you mean?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

We were on a pay site and there were lots of fake profiles. We, and other members we spoke to, had the suspicion that some of them were created by the site owners to pull in the punters.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *verysmileMan
over a year ago

Canterbury

"I think that making it a pay to join site might deter some time wasters but I think they would be replaced by people who think that because they've paid they're entitled to sex."

Definitely. There are numerous times that I have been to a club with a friend, only to find that hoards of single guys demand sex almost in desperation because they have actually paid for entrance.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *andsonjohnMan
over a year ago

in the eye of the storm

"I think that fab should become a chargeable site.

Views?

paying to use a site isn't going to change someone's personality if there a idiot timewaster daydreamer what ever laying down some money to be here isn't going to change that fact .

I will say this though the number of men looking to play compared to women and couples looking to play does change on a paid site compared to a free one .

less men as they have to pay more woman and couples because they can join for free so the odds of a normal intelligent respectful guy standing out and being successful greatly increase especially on some site where its only 3 to 1 by that I mean three guys for every woman or couple looking to play.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *om and JennieCouple
over a year ago

Chams or Socials

I have no issue in paying for use but wish the site wasn't do basic. It needs investing & updating!!!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I have no issue in paying for use but wish the site wasn't do basic. It needs investing & updating!!!"

Yes it's changed very little over the years.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I've done ok on sdc "

and so did we 6 years ago when it was an active and busy site, we went back on it at the beginning of the year because they had an offer on for membership and it was dead, and I personally think fab is a much better site, not just for the money but generally a better site to use and we found it has more friendly people on, but good for you if SDC is working for you.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *uerido55Man
over a year ago

Manchester

"We were on a pay site and there were lots of fake profiles. We, and other members we spoke to, had the suspicion that some of them were created by the site owners to pull in the punters. "

Exactly my experience. Winked and messaged from members who were online and when I tried to _iew their profile "this member is no longer on site" or similar message. Only to be messaged again 15 minutes later by the same profile.

One evening I had 30 of these such contacts (interesting because it always seemed to happen when renewal time was looming near)!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I think that fab should become a chargeable site.

Views?

If you want to be a free member of this site, you can be. That is refreshing. It encourages people to join?

Temewasters? You will get them anywhere. They are not difficult to spot.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I already pay to support the site. I don't have my time wasted by anyone.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ee VianteWoman
over a year ago

Somewhere in North Norfolk

"I already pay to support the site. I don't have my time wasted by anyone. "

I manage to waste my own time well enough. I don't need any help!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"So why did you leave there then knowing you where coming to a free site which would have more people that are not serious on"

I haven't left

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"I have no issue in paying for use but wish the site wasn't do basic. It needs investing & updating!!!"

Agreed

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *alcon43Woman
over a year ago

Paisley

Some features might be nice to have but I like sites that are easy to use.

Paying for a site doesn't make it better. I do subscribe but mainly because it's affordable and easier to follow messages.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"I think that fab should become a chargeable site.

Views?

Why jon here if the chargeable site was so much better.?

I'm still a member there but was originally here

Ahhh. The 'I was on a site that was £16 a month and it was a breath of fresh air ' statement lead me to thinkl of the past tense ..

if that site is better stick with that and enjoy

I use both I just think it would make fab more productive on all accounts

..productive? what do you mean?

It would trim back on some that are here just for compliments and the money could be invested to set up a section that provides an opportunity too book holidays aimed at the lifestyle soley

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *alcon43Woman
over a year ago

Paisley

"I think that fab should become a chargeable site.

Views?

Why jon here if the chargeable site was so much better.?

I'm still a member there but was originally here

Ahhh. The 'I was on a site that was £16 a month and it was a breath of fresh air ' statement lead me to thinkl of the past tense ..

if that site is better stick with that and enjoy

I use both I just think it would make fab more productive on all accounts

..productive? what do you mean?

It would trim back on some that are here just for compliments and the money could be invested to set up a section that provides an opportunity too book holidays aimed at the lifestyle soley "

Who is here just for compliments? I've had compliments, give compliments and had my share of messages that are downright vulgur. Didn't join to get hassle.

Fab isn't a holiday company. There are people who do that already.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I couldn't afford £16 a month, it would not stop time wasters, anyway define time waster please. I chat to people to see if I want to meet them, if I do not meet I suppose that makes me a timewaster does it. We are talking about sex, hard core sex, health, safety ect ect here, not going out for a cup of tea. It's not a free for all, fill your cup with as much pussy or cock as you like. If you don't like how site is run or the people on it, leave.....Simples XXX

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I think that fab should become a chargeable site.

Views?

Why jon here if the chargeable site was so much better.?

I'm still a member there but was originally here

Ahhh. The 'I was on a site that was £16 a month and it was a breath of fresh air ' statement lead me to thinkl of the past tense ..

if that site is better stick with that and enjoy

I use both I just think it would make fab more productive on all accounts

..productive? what do you mean?

It would trim back on some that are here just for compliments and the money could be invested to set up a section that provides an opportunity too book holidays aimed at the lifestyle soley "

Best thing you can do is leave this site and set up your own, as you seem to think you know more than the site owners who have been running Fab for years. Goodbye OP, close the door on your way out.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ophieslutTV/TS
over a year ago

Central

I think it would make little difference and we all potentially benefit from having access to a wider membership group if it's free.

Leave the onus on us as users to filter and determine who we want to meet and improve our skills, if we're getting failures. Admin work hard in the background ing out undesirables.

Free is good - having no barriers to joining, like a fee, increases take up and distinguishes us from a con site too.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ee VianteWoman
over a year ago

Somewhere in North Norfolk

"I think that fab should become a chargeable site.

Views?

Why jon here if the chargeable site was so much better.?

I'm still a member there but was originally here

Ahhh. The 'I was on a site that was £16 a month and it was a breath of fresh air ' statement lead me to thinkl of the past tense ..

if that site is better stick with that and enjoy

I use both I just think it would make fab more productive on all accounts

..productive? what do you mean?

It would trim back on some that are here just for compliments and the money could be invested to set up a section that provides an opportunity too book holidays aimed at the lifestyle soley "

Holidays? That's a bit random. Why would fab want to do that? It's a totally different business and potentially a hell of a lot of hassle.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I think that fab should become a chargeable site.

Views?

Why jon here if the chargeable site was so much better.?

I'm still a member there but was originally here

Ahhh. The 'I was on a site that was £16 a month and it was a breath of fresh air ' statement lead me to thinkl of the past tense ..

if that site is better stick with that and enjoy

I use both I just think it would make fab more productive on all accounts

..productive? what do you mean?

It would trim back on some that are here just for compliments and the money could be invested to set up a section that provides an opportunity too book holidays aimed at the lifestyle soley "

Holidays?

Really, that's what you want your £16 a month invested in?

We'll have to rename Fab Thomas Cock.......

*shakes head in disbelief at the bright ideas some people have.....

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

If membership on here goes ip it may get prohibitive for some of us.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *iamondsmiles.Woman
over a year ago

little house on the praire

"I think that fab should become a chargeable site.

Views?

Why jon here if the chargeable site was so much better.?

I'm still a member there but was originally here

Ahhh. The 'I was on a site that was £16 a month and it was a breath of fresh air ' statement lead me to thinkl of the past tense ..

if that site is better stick with that and enjoy

I use both I just think it would make fab more productive on all accounts

..productive? what do you mean?

It would trim back on some that are here just for compliments and the money could be invested to set up a section that provides an opportunity too book holidays aimed at the lifestyle soley "
why not sort your own holiday out. Does your £16 a month site have a holiday section? Or better still they could invest in a string of hotels where we could have our meets

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I think that fab should become a chargeable site.

Views?

Why jon here if the chargeable site was so much better.?

I'm still a member there but was originally here

Ahhh. The 'I was on a site that was £16 a month and it was a breath of fresh air ' statement lead me to thinkl of the past tense ..

if that site is better stick with that and enjoy

I use both I just think it would make fab more productive on all accounts

..productive? what do you mean?

It would trim back on some that are here just for compliments and the money could be invested to set up a section that provides an opportunity too book holidays aimed at the lifestyle soley why not sort your own holiday out. Does your £16 a month site have a holiday section?

Or better still they could invest in a string of hotels where we could have our meets"

Actually you might be on to something there.......

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *enard ArgenteMan
over a year ago

London and France

The £20 a month sites have more fakes and bullshitters than here....

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ynecplCouple
over a year ago

Newcastle upon Tyne

We joined SDS first but quickly came off as meets were pretty much none existent and the monthly fee us feel we were just wasting our money. We joined fab which seemed far more active and quickly became supporters.

If we had been made to pay a fee from the start we might not have stayed as we took time to find our feet and arrange meets.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

Post new Message to Thread