Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's completely up to you. It's your profile and what you choose to display " This | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Being around the track a bit much? Who are you to decide someone has too much fun? " Not deciding or judging just asking opions | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Anyone who judges someone else on here for the amount of verifications they have really needs to get down from their pedestal " As I said above. Not judging | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Anyone who judges someone else on here for the amount of verifications they have really needs to get down from their pedestal As I said above. Not judging" By saying you think there is a respect level shows you are judging. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Anyone who judges someone else on here for the amount of verifications they have really needs to get down from their pedestal As I said above. Not judging By saying you think there is a respect level shows you are judging." | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just think there's a respect level" Absolutly not your here to enjoy yourself not be everyones dad 'er son your having too much sex it will fall off if you keep going' If you dont like the fact that some one you like has too many verys then move on simples I say the more experianced the more fun | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Being around the track a bit much? Who are you to decide someone has too much fun? " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's completely up to you. It's your profile and what you choose to display This " this definition is just right | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Anyone who judges someone else on here for the amount of verifications they have really needs to get down from their pedestal As I said above. Not judging" what did you mean by respect | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Being around the track a bit much? Who are you to decide someone has too much fun? " just jealous | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"try and show a mix - on our couples profile showed at least one from a club meet - one from party -- one from couple - single fem - etc - to kind of show that we do what we say we do -but totally up to you " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just think there's a respect level" Set your "respect level" where you're happy and stick to people who are within it. Lots of people say on their profile "not looking to shag my way round the site" which makes me think lots of people think it's possible to have too many verifications. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just think there's a respect level" Everyone's idea of a benchmark will be different. If you're equating lots of sex with not being 'respectful' maybe you're not on the right site... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Being around the track a bit much? Who are you to decide someone has too much fun? " Exactly, he is judging women me thinks ! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just think there's a respect level Everyone's idea of a benchmark will be different. If you're equating lots of sex with not being 'respectful' maybe you're not on the right site..." Right the first bit was all I was looking for. Do people have there own. I.e do those searching tend to bypass for example someone cus they have 100+ meets ( not as in clubs just one on one) in a few month. Not the wrong site to be on just didn't realise a new law had been passed making it a illegal to ask peoples _iews and opions. And by doing so I obviously break a law of jelousy and judging | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just think there's a respect level Everyone's idea of a benchmark will be different. If you're equating lots of sex with not being 'respectful' maybe you're not on the right site... Right the first bit was all I was looking for. Do people have there own. I.e do those searching tend to bypass for example someone cus they have 100+ meets ( not as in clubs just one on one) in a few month. Not the wrong site to be on just didn't realise a new law had been passed making it a illegal to ask peoples _iews and opions. And by doing so I obviously break a law of jelousy and judging" No law has been passed. 'Twas merely a suggestion based on your comments that's all. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So browsing the profiles on here and just thought I'd throw it out there regarding amounts of verifications. Let's just say on a 3 month old profile based on all meets... at what point do you think is the right amount of meets and you would class as been around the track a bit to much?" | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One wonders if the OP would turn down meets, if they were offered, if he felt he'd had enough that month, and at what point he'd decide to do that. "Respect level"? Really? Respect for whom?" the very next guy who messages me for a meet im going to send him a formal message saying i cant meet as i will be over my monthly quota | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One wonders if the OP would turn down meets, if they were offered, if he felt he'd had enough that month, and at what point he'd decide to do that. "Respect level"? Really? Respect for whom?the very next guy who messages me for a meet im going to send him a formal message saying i cant meet as i will be over my monthly quota" | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One wonders if the OP would turn down meets, if they were offered, if he felt he'd had enough that month, and at what point he'd decide to do that. "Respect level"? Really? Respect for whom?the very next guy who messages me for a meet im going to send him a formal message saying i cant meet as i will be over my monthly quota" It's either that or deal with the fact that no one respects you. Choices, eh? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One wonders if the OP would turn down meets, if they were offered, if he felt he'd had enough that month, and at what point he'd decide to do that. "Respect level"? Really? Respect for whom?the very next guy who messages me for a meet im going to send him a formal message saying i cant meet as i will be over my monthly quota" Maybe we could have a Fab ration book? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just think there's a respect level" | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just think there's a respect level " I wonder if that level is different for men as opposed to women, in the eyes of the OP. When should us women refuse to meet a guy because he's had too many meets? At what point should we lose our respect for a man for having too much sex? I wonder if it would be ok to meet a guy with too many meets, the next month, once his quota reset. I never realised this NSA sex thing was so complicated. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Being around the track a bit much? Who are you to decide someone has too much fun? " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ha ha. I sent the message and recieved a very polite reply back. Might start using it as a reply message from now on " Have they asked to reserve a place for next month? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One wonders if the OP would turn down meets, if they were offered, if he felt he'd had enough that month, and at what point he'd decide to do that. "Respect level"? Really? Respect for whom?" One does not need to wonder one only needs to ease and one will tell. The answers is yes and I have turned meets down. I can count my partners nearly on one hand been active at 17. That's by my Choice and not dictated by anyone else. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ha ha. I sent the message and recieved a very polite reply back. Might start using it as a reply message from now on Have they asked to reserve a place for next month? " more or less they said sometime in the future when i wasnt so busy | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One wonders if the OP would turn down meets, if they were offered, if he felt he'd had enough that month, and at what point he'd decide to do that. "Respect level"? Really? Respect for whom? One does not need to wonder one only needs to ease and one will tell. The answers is yes and I have turned meets down. I can count my partners nearly on one hand been active at 17. That's by my Choice and not dictated by anyone else." might be a bit of a shock for you on here then, some might have had more than that in one night | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So browsing the profiles on here and just thought I'd throw it out there regarding amounts of verifications. Let's just say on a 3 month old profile based on all meets... at what point do you think is the right amount of meets and you would class as been around the track a bit to much?" Just because someone has more sex than you doesn't make them dirty, promiscuous or unworthy of meeting. Just because someone has less sex than you doesn't make them disease free and pure of mind. I see no other reasons for totting up scores unless maybe you are doing scientific research into sexual appetite and sayyy certain ages, occupations , genders, nationalities. If you are, there's easier ways. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So browsing the profiles on here and just thought I'd throw it out there regarding amounts of verifications. Let's just say on a 3 month old profile based on all meets... at what point do you think is the right amount of meets and you would class as been around the track a bit to much? " What's on your feet ? I can't make it out ? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One wonders if the OP would turn down meets, if they were offered, if he felt he'd had enough that month, and at what point he'd decide to do that. "Respect level"? Really? Respect for whom? One does not need to wonder one only needs to ease and one will tell. The answers is yes and I have turned meets down. I can count my partners nearly on one hand been active at 17. That's by my Choice and not dictated by anyone else.might be a bit of a shock for you on here then, some might have had more than that in one night" No shock I may have a limit to my own _iews and opinions regarding sexual partners but I'm not blind or death | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Jesus....... one I'm entitled to my opinion and freedom of expression. Two, so are you in which I respect although may not always agree, three, read it again and you see I asked what peoples _iews was not wether or not you agreed with mine.four in sexual slang round the track rendered to someone who as had many sexual partners, slag and slut often refers to those doing the same without respecting themself I.e unsafe and as I don't believe in most cases that is not correct I chose not to use the later two. And at any point where have I said im rsingling " but your talking about levels of respect on a site like this as though those who have lots of sex are different to those that havent | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One wonders if the OP would turn down meets, if they were offered, if he felt he'd had enough that month, and at what point he'd decide to do that. "Respect level"? Really? Respect for whom? One does not need to wonder one only needs to ease and one will tell. The answers is yes and I have turned meets down. I can count my partners nearly on one hand been active at 17. That's by my Choice and not dictated by anyone else." You've turned down offers of meets with people you would otherwise have met just because you thought you'd had enough meets that week/month? For that specific reason alone? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"That is my _iew on my own opinion and at no time have I stated a division of difference" So do you claim to have turned down offers of meets with people you would otherwise have met, just because you thought you'd had enough meets that week/month? For that specific reason alone? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One wonders if the OP would turn down meets, if they were offered, if he felt he'd had enough that month, and at what point he'd decide to do that. "Respect level"? Really? Respect for whom? One does not need to wonder one only needs to ease and one will tell. The answers is yes and I have turned meets down. I can count my partners nearly on one hand been active at 17. That's by my Choice and not dictated by anyone else. You've turned down offers of meets with people you would otherwise have met just because you thought you'd had enough meets that week/month? For that specific reason alone? " again at no time I have I said above I would have met anyone!!, I asked if people cared to share there _iews and opinions. To fair in my first post I never Evan revered to it been my opinion although I had the opinion a few post down everyone decided for me | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One wonders if the OP would turn down meets, if they were offered, if he felt he'd had enough that month, and at what point he'd decide to do that. "Respect level"? Really? Respect for whom? One does not need to wonder one only needs to ease and one will tell. The answers is yes and I have turned meets down. I can count my partners nearly on one hand been active at 17. That's by my Choice and not dictated by anyone else. You've turned down offers of meets with people you would otherwise have met just because you thought you'd had enough meets that week/month? For that specific reason alone? again at no time I have I said above I would have met anyone!!, I asked if people cared to share there _iews and opinions. To fair in my first post I never Evan revered to it been my opinion although I had the opinion a few post down everyone decided for me" So you haven't actually turned anyone down because you felt you'd had enough meets that month? You claimed you have above. So my question stands. Would you turn down a meet with someone you would otherwise have met just (only) because you felt you'd had enough meets that week/month? After all, you seem to expect other people should. Would you? Would you really turn down meets with people you would otherwise meet, simply to conform to someone else's idea of what's proper and worthy of respect? How would you choose whose standard with which to conform? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So browsing the profiles on here and just thought I'd throw it out there regarding amounts of verifications. Let's just say on a 3 month old profile based on all meets... at what point do you think is the right amount of meets and you would class as been around the track a bit to much?" Stupid question really OP | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"And that is why verification opinions should be kept to yourself LOL on a personal note though, I prefer them shown, that way you'll know whether you've pulled class or erm.....relax and go forth ????" So would someone with "class" have lots of veris or just a few ? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I got verified twice in one day on my previous profile,one was from a meet that day my first verification ever. I then verified another bloke I was meeting who had no Veris, he verified me back. So according to the veris I did 2 meets that day but I in fact only did one xxx " Yeah, that happened to me - then the next day, another guy I'd met a few weeks prior noticed that I had veris and decided to add his own. And then I went for a social drink the next evening. It looked like I'd fucked four guys in three days, when actually, I'd only slept with two of them, and over the course of a few weeks. You just can't tell! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"And that is why verification opinions should be kept to yourself LOL on a personal note though, I prefer them shown, that way you'll know whether you've pulled class or erm.....relax and go forth ???? So would someone with "class" have lots of veris or just a few ?" Experience counts lol | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Wether or not regarded stupid or not, 70 replies so it's done what it's aim is.... got people talking and debating." We're not debating though. Most of us are saying the same thing. That it's none of your business who others meet and to think there's such a thing as too much sex, on a swinging site, is ridiculous. The only person we're questioning is you and you're avoiding most of the questions and trying to backtrack. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Being around the track a bit much? Who are you to decide someone has too much fun? " Someone isn't deciding someone has had to much fun when they have tons of verifies lets say three or four sexual ones a week for three or four months They are deciding that's that to much fun for their tastes they can come to this decision for a verity of reasons ' could be they just don't want to be another notch on a bed post forgotten about as soon as the sex is over . Could be they are thinking about their own sexual health and others they regularly play with and have come to the convulsion that someone having that much fun is to much of a health risk for their tastes . Personal choice I'm all for it or do you think its unreasonable for someone to make a personal choice about a fellow site user based off of the number of sexual partners they have had over a relative short period of time . | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So browsing the profiles on here and just thought I'd throw it out there regarding amounts of verifications. Let's just say on a 3 month old profile based on all meets... at what point do you think is the right amount of meets and you would class as been around the track a bit to much?" There is no right amount Surely it depends how many meets the individual wants I really don't pay that much attention to how many others have met, if a guy mails me and I find him attractive and we get alone I'm not going to turn him down because of how many verifications he has, I'm not looking for a relationship so it's nothing to do with me I've even met guys with no verifications at all | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just think there's a respect level I wonder if that level is different for men as opposed to women, in the eyes of the OP. When should us women refuse to meet a guy because he's had too many meets? At what point should we lose our respect for a man for having too much sex? I wonder if it would be ok to meet a guy with too many meets, the next month, once his quota reset. I never realised this NSA sex thing was so complicated." Its not about losing respect for them in my opinion is about how much you respect yourself and those you choose to play with . By that I mean this I don't _iew myself as a easy lay so I am natural attracted to others who _iew themselves in the same way . Then there's sexual health to consider not only my own but those I regularly play with the more free and easy you are the more likely you are to pick up STD that's a fact which sadly one can not ignore even if one wanted to . So one has to make a calculation about who one chooses to approach to say otherwise would be disrespectful and a insult to the intelligence of all site users in my opinion . | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Have not avoided any.... you want answered then you need to specify in a better way than assumptions. This be last reply from me on this part" I didn't make an assumption at all. I asked if you would on the basis that you expect others to. You still haven't answered, interestingly. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just think there's a respect level I wonder if that level is different for men as opposed to women, in the eyes of the OP. When should us women refuse to meet a guy because he's had too many meets? At what point should we lose our respect for a man for having too much sex? I wonder if it would be ok to meet a guy with too many meets, the next month, once his quota reset. I never realised this NSA sex thing was so complicated. Its not about losing respect for them in my opinion is about how much you respect yourself and those you choose to play with . By that I mean this I don't _iew myself as a easy lay so I am natural attracted to others who _iew themselves in the same way . Then there's sexual health to consider not only my own but those I regularly play with the more free and easy you are the more likely you are to pick up STD that's a fact which sadly one can not ignore even if one wanted to . So one has to make a calculation about who one chooses to approach to say otherwise would be disrespectful and a insult to the intelligence of all site users in my opinion ." But who is to say how many is too many? It's something we decide for ourselves, not for anyone else. There's no possible way to know for sure how many people someone here has met or has had sex with and over what period of time. Even if I showed all my veris on here, nobody would have any idea how many people I've had sex with, or how many times. The STDs thing is a red herring. It only takes one meet for that, and it's possible to catch one in a relationship you think is monogamous (and therefore safe) if one partner is playing around. There's no such thing as safe, other than total abstinence. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"And that is why verification opinions should be kept to yourself LOL on a personal note though, I prefer them shown, that way you'll know whether you've pulled class or erm.....relax and go forth ????" oh ffs lol so do classy chicks have sex or do classy chicks not have sex | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Being around the track a bit much? Who are you to decide someone has too much fun? Someone isn't deciding someone has had to much fun when they have tons of verifies lets say three or four sexual ones a week for three or four months They are deciding that's that to much fun for their tastes they can come to this decision for a verity of reasons ' could be they just don't want to be another notch on a bed post forgotten about as soon as the sex is over . Could be they are thinking about their own sexual health and others they regularly play with and have come to the convulsion that someone having that much fun is to much of a health risk for their tastes . Personal choice I'm all for it or do you think its unreasonable for someone to make a personal choice about a fellow site user based off of the number of sexual partners they have had over a relative short period of time . " Having a lot of sexual partners doesn't mean that said person is going to be riddled with sti's how, very, naive of you. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"And that is why verification opinions should be kept to yourself LOL on a personal note though, I prefer them shown, that way you'll know whether you've pulled class or erm.....relax and go forth ???? oh ffs lol so do classy chicks have sex or do classy chicks not have sex" I'm trying to work that out myself now. This is all far more complicated than I realised. What if we have the sex in a full length ballgown, sipping champers with our little fingers sticking out? Does that help? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just think there's a respect level I wonder if that level is different for men as opposed to women, in the eyes of the OP. When should us women refuse to meet a guy because he's had too many meets? At what point should we lose our respect for a man for having too much sex? I wonder if it would be ok to meet a guy with too many meets, the next month, once his quota reset. I never realised this NSA sex thing was so complicated. Its not about losing respect for them in my opinion is about how much you respect yourself and those you choose to play with . By that I mean this I don't _iew myself as a easy lay so I am natural attracted to others who _iew themselves in the same way . Then there's sexual health to consider not only my own but those I regularly play with the more free and easy you are the more likely you are to pick up STD that's a fact which sadly one can not ignore even if one wanted to . So one has to make a calculation about who one chooses to approach to say otherwise would be disrespectful and a insult to the intelligence of all site users in my opinion . But who is to say how many is too many? It's something we decide for ourselves, not for anyone else. There's no possible way to know for sure how many people someone here has met or has had sex with and over what period of time. Even if I showed all my veris on here, nobody would have any idea how many people I've had sex with, or how many times. The STDs thing is a red herring. It only takes one meet for that, and it's possible to catch one in a relationship you think is monogamous (and therefore safe) if one partner is playing around. There's no such thing as safe, other than total abstinence." You decide how many is to many for you . Its a personal choice you make by doing that your taking control and acting in a way that your comfortable and being true to yourself . If you pass someone other based on number of sexual meets your not passing judgement on them as a human being but on them as a sexual partner . Its no different in my opinion than passing on someone based off of their looks or body type or sexual preference or do you think that when you pass someone other based on them personal choices your making a judgement on them as a human being or just on them as a suitable sexual partner for you . | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Being around the track a bit much? Who are you to decide someone has too much fun? Someone isn't deciding someone has had to much fun when they have tons of verifies lets say three or four sexual ones a week for three or four months They are deciding that's that to much fun for their tastes they can come to this decision for a verity of reasons ' could be they just don't want to be another notch on a bed post forgotten about as soon as the sex is over . Could be they are thinking about their own sexual health and others they regularly play with and have come to the convulsion that someone having that much fun is to much of a health risk for their tastes . Personal choice I'm all for it or do you think its unreasonable for someone to make a personal choice about a fellow site user based off of the number of sexual partners they have had over a relative short period of time . Having a lot of sexual partners doesn't mean that said person is going to be riddled with sti's how, very, naive of you. " Oh I'm not naive just believe in maths check out the six degrees of separation theory this theory is the reason I have regular sexual health checks and think carefully about who I choose to play with . I'm not ruled by libido my libido serves me not the other way round . | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |