Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Every single year the Daily Mail takes delight in taking photographs of ladies at Aintree who they think should be subjected to ridicule in a national paper. Some of the ladies may be deemed to be voluptuous.....by some. Some may be deemed to be inappropriately or unfashionably dressed......by some. Some of the ladies may be deemed to have overdone the fake tan.......by some. But you know what? A BIG 'SO WHAT'. They are enjoying a day out at the races with friends. They are not doing any harm to anyone. It does not look like they have 'posed' for the photographs and it is unlikely that they have asked to photographed by some sleazy, slimy photographer from the Daily Jackboot. I hate it. It's cruel and unnecessary. The ladies 'featured' in todays rag should join together and launch a class action against the rag concerned and sue them into oblivion. Thank you. Rant over " Think us women are used to it. Celebs who gain a little are splashed over the papers.like how dare they... So and so aint wearing the right dress or has the worng hair do. All pics probably done by men who are scared shitless that women can make their own mind up on what to wear , where to wear it and if she fancys summat more than tissue for her dinner. And then posted in the paper by jealous small minded females who cant get a shag | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"dont buy the paper,simple" I don't. I glance at it online. But anyway the point was...........never mind. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"dont buy the paper,simple" If Mail readers didn't read the Mail they wouldn't know whose fault everything is - and many wouldn't know what day it is. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"dont buy the paper,simple If Mail readers didn't read the Mail they wouldn't know whose fault everything is - and many wouldn't know what day it is." True. I read a wide range of broadsheets including US and Middle Eastern publications to try and get a good balance and a feel of how the same stories are reported differently. I take in a couple of tabloids to see what is forming public opinion. The Mail seems to have a particularly broad vindictive and nasty streak. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ive just taken a peek theres one woman there who looks like a drag queen, some look wonderful some look hideous...just like anywhere ya go " That may be so. But is there any need to hold them up to ridicule in such a way? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ive just taken a peek theres one woman there who looks like a drag queen, some look wonderful some look hideous...just like anywhere ya go That may be so. But is there any need to hold them up to ridicule in such a way?" are you one the birds in the pics? you have taken this all very personally? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ive just taken a peek theres one woman there who looks like a drag queen, some look wonderful some look hideous...just like anywhere ya go That may be so. But is there any need to hold them up to ridicule in such a way?are you one the birds in the pics? you have taken this all very personally? " It just ticks me right off to be honest. As Katherine Tates Granny might say 'What a fackin' liberty' | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ive just taken a peek theres one woman there who looks like a drag queen, some look wonderful some look hideous...just like anywhere ya go That may be so. But is there any need to hold them up to ridicule in such a way?are you one the birds in the pics? you have taken this all very personally? It just ticks me right off to be honest. As Katherine Tates Granny might say 'What a fackin' liberty' " take a chill pill it may help | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ive just taken a peek theres one woman there who looks like a drag queen, some look wonderful some look hideous...just like anywhere ya go That may be so. But is there any need to hold them up to ridicule in such a way?are you one the birds in the pics? you have taken this all very personally? It just ticks me right off to be honest. As Katherine Tates Granny might say 'What a fackin' liberty' take a chill pill it may help " Naah. A burst of self righteous indignation is good for the constitution | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ive just taken a peek theres one woman there who looks like a drag queen, some look wonderful some look hideous...just like anywhere ya go That may be so. But is there any need to hold them up to ridicule in such a way?are you one the birds in the pics? you have taken this all very personally? It just ticks me right off to be honest. As Katherine Tates Granny might say 'What a fackin' liberty' take a chill pill it may help Naah. A burst of self righteous indignation is good for the constitution " I wouldnt know | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ive just taken a peek theres one woman there who looks like a drag queen, some look wonderful some look hideous...just like anywhere ya go That may be so. But is there any need to hold them up to ridicule in such a way?are you one the birds in the pics? you have taken this all very personally? It just ticks me right off to be honest. As Katherine Tates Granny might say 'What a fackin' liberty' take a chill pill it may help Naah. A burst of self righteous indignation is good for the constitution I wouldnt know " I should hope not as you are a lady. However, it comes naturally to a man of the cloth albeit one of the Mad Monk variety | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Every single year the Daily Mail takes delight in taking photographs of ladies at Aintree who they think should be subjected to ridicule in a national paper. Some of the ladies may be deemed to be voluptuous.....by some. Some may be deemed to be inappropriately or unfashionably dressed......by some. Some of the ladies may be deemed to have overdone the fake tan.......by some. But you know what? A BIG 'SO WHAT'. They are enjoying a day out at the races with friends. They are not doing any harm to anyone. It does not look like they have 'posed' for the photographs and it is unlikely that they have asked to photographed by some sleazy, slimy photographer from the Daily Jackboot. I hate it. It's cruel and unnecessary. The ladies 'featured' in todays rag should join together and launch a class action against the rag concerned and sue them into oblivion. Thank you. Rant over " I've just looked online and I must have been reading a different article to you as none of the captions under any of the pictures said anything "cruel and unnecessary" and I didn't see what they could take the paper to court for. Oh and most of the pictures did look "posed" for! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
""none of the captions under any of the pictures said anything "cruel and unnecessary" Didn't say anything about captions under pictures or anywhere else. The publication of the pictures combined with the tone of the piece were cruel and unnecessary in my humble opinion." see i dont get the "cruel and unnecessary" | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
""none of the captions under any of the pictures said anything "cruel and unnecessary" Didn't say anything about captions under pictures or anywhere else. The publication of the pictures combined with the tone of the piece were cruel and unnecessary in my humble opinion." If you are meaning the heading and the first few lines of text then there was still nothing that could be considered "cruel and unnecessary" seeing as the text was "And they're off! Aintree's eye-popping fashion girls A vast array of brightly patterned outfits was on display for the start of Aintree today with the usual medley of ensembles that were more entertaining than the racing. The equestrian event, known for its colourful female punters, didn't fail to disappoint as it kicked off with a bang. Cleavage-revealing maxi dresses appeared the popular choice of the day." Considering what some were wearing, I think the paper actually held back on what they could have said! In my humble opinion too! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They've even got Doddy in the revamped version. How tickled I am." It has changed since earlier: it's changed several times since it was first up and yes some of the pics are now posed. The earlier ones were "candid" shots of hideous looking women in ill-fitting garish outfits. Yeah I said it: hideous! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |