Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
![]() | Back to forum list |
![]() | Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest | ![]() |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Statistically no less unlikely to win than any other combination! Equally as likely as 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 being pulled ![]() Is it? On the face of it yes, but... Once a single number (1-9) has been drawn, there are only 8 left, but 9 of each of the other groups, (10-19, 20-29 etc), so isn't it more likely one of those will be pulled next than a single number? Wondering about these things is what keeps me awake at night. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I might go and put the same numbers on, just in case they come in, you'll be gutted if half of fab does the same and they come in ![]() 1 in 28 million or something daft, I think (of winning the jackpot). | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Statistically no less unlikely to win than any other combination! Equally as likely as 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 being pulled ![]() Not necessarily pulled in order but choose any combination of 7 numbers and the odds are exactly the same (they might be pulled 1-7 in order or 7,5,4,1,6,2,3 etc). It doesn't feel right that the odds should be the same for a consecutive 'group' but it is as likely to be 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 as it is the OPs 2,3,13,33,36, 1,11 | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top | ![]() |