FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Verification system poll

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Which would you prefer and why?

A) Current verification system where you can write whatever you like.

B) Just tick boxes for set text such as: "Met this person for a social/ Met this person for a sex meet." - and no text that you can enter.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *opping_candyWoman
over a year ago

Huddersfield, centralish

I quite like it as it is.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Both option are good tbh

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eMontresMan
over a year ago

Halesowen

Why not both? additional text can be optional

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Which would you prefer and why?

A) Current verification system where you can write whatever you like.

B) Just tick boxes for set text such as: "Met this person for a social/ Met this person for a sex meet." - and no text that you can enter. "

A. I thinking putting some context to a meet, gives you a better idea of who they are.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I like reading some of the verifications as you can get good insight into what the person is like sometimes. On occaision it can speak more than what's said in the profile

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Current system. I read them when really bored they can be quite funny

But to achieve the aim of proving a person is real, ticks would suffice.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *opping_candyWoman
over a year ago

Huddersfield, centralish


"I quite like it as it is."

Sorry, forgot the why.

I enjoy writing interesting verifications that I hope give a flavour of that person to others reading them. And yes I like reading a veri I've received after a great meet or event.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondsmiles.Woman
over a year ago

little house on the praire

Im quite happy how it is. People can just type as basic as they want. Plus i dont necessarily want people to know if ive had sex on a meet. Ive turned into a prude

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Both are good, would be good to havd the tick box option for those who don't know what to write.

A limit on words would be better, as some veris could fill a piece of A4 paper!

Sarah

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ikeC81Man
over a year ago

harrow

Both would be good

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Which would you prefer and why?

A) Current verification system where you can write whatever you like.

B) Just tick boxes for set text such as: "Met this person for a social/ Met this person for a sex meet." - and no text that you can enter. "

B definitely for me

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *olgateMan
over a year ago

on the road to nowhere in particular

I don't read veris

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iewMan
Forum Mod
over a year ago

Angus & Findhorn

C: he/she is mine and I don't share my toys

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *irtyGirlWoman
over a year ago

Edinburgh

Don't care... don't use it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondjoeMan
over a year ago

Glastonbury

There is an art to verifications - I love it

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Need some imagination on them . better than nice person, suckable cock

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ackDMissMorganCouple
over a year ago

Halifax

Im nosy too ,so like to read them .Like all the cliches .Miss.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I would quite like the option to differentiate between meet (play) and meet (social); gets away from the ambiguous ones which insinuate more than reality.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ivemeyoursoulWoman
over a year ago

Easter just around the corner!

Hmm good question...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Im quite happy how it is. People can just type as basic as they want. Plus i dont necessarily want people to know if ive had sex on a meet. Ive turned into a prude "

Sometimes I really like the nice personal things people write in them. It's special in a way and you don't need to share those with everyone. Having tick boxes feels clinical. People who only want a tick can just not show the veris.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *alandNitaCouple
over a year ago

Scunthorpe


"Both are good, would be good to havd the tick box option for those who don't know what to write.

A limit on words would be better, as some veris could fill a piece of A4 paper!

Sarah "

This... a combination of the current system with tick boxes would be perfect.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

O am just nosey lol love reading verifications seeing what people get up to think of it as fab sexy soap opera x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iSTARessWoman
over a year ago

London


"Both are good, would be good to havd the tick box option for those who don't know what to write.

A limit on words would be better, as some veris could fill a piece of A4 paper!

Sarah "

This. 140 limit idea. Like Twitter.

Some folk have verifications from some nut bags that would have me avoiding them as I don't fancy being stalked by former conquests (it happens)

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ENDAROOSCouple
over a year ago

South West London / Surrey


"Which would you prefer and why?

A) Current verification system where you can write whatever you like.

B) Just tick boxes for set text such as: "Met this person for a social/ Met this person for a sex meet." - and no text that you can enter. "

A) but with a word limit, some are like a novel.

Like the idea further up about different colours for social & sex meets.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Current system. I read them when really bored they can be quite funny

But to achieve the aim of proving a person is real, ticks would suffice."

This for me too.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *risky_MareWoman
over a year ago

...Up on the Downs

I like the current system, I find it invaluable, and I love writing them and receiving expressive ones.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *odareyouMan
over a year ago

not far from iceland,,,,,, tescos is nearer though :-) (near leeds)

I like the current system, it allows me to be creative and hopefully give an idea of what I found the person(s) to be like,...

Rather than (tick) she / he exists.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Currently people can put what they want and there are some good funny and imaginative veris out there.

A set of tick boxes just sounds grey and regimented to be honest

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rightonsteveMan
over a year ago

Brighton - even Hove!

C) he was a shit shag

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iffraffMan
over a year ago

Gloucester

Some interesting ideas put forward. I do think it needs a overhaul tho as many, pretty much say the same things and some can be descriptive beyond necessary.

Adding the tick box and limiting the word count tho seem good ideas.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *aughtyYorkGentMan
over a year ago

Yorkshire


"Which would you prefer and why?

A) Current verification system where you can write whatever you like.

B) Just tick boxes for set text such as: "Met this person for a social/ Met this person for a sex meet." - and no text that you can enter. "

C) Neither, abolish them altogether. I'm always grateful for a nice verification, but imo the system is at best meaningless, and at worst divisive and potentially misleading.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top