Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"so deserving. i just thought,what do you have to do to win the victoria cross. " Die. Basically. Although eleven of them were awarded to combatants at Rourke's Drift, many of whom survived the battle. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"so deserving. i just thought,what do you have to do to win the victoria cross. " It's very open ended. The medal is 'For Valour' and the citation speaks of "in the face of the enemy" but it's no as if there's a sliding scale of heroism. It's all about action in a given set of circumstances and each potential recipient is considered on the merits of their behaviour in their situation. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"so deserving. i just thought,what do you have to do to win the victoria cross. Die. Basically. Although eleven of them were awarded to combatants at Rourke's Drift, many of whom survived the battle." That's a long way from the truth or the reality | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The Lumley intervention did no good whatsoever and may well have harmed the enlistment numbers in Nepal, but there's no doubt she meant well - or she had a career to resurrect " Always with the pessimism. Joanna Lumley has spoken out as a human rights activist for Survival International and the Gurkha Justice Campaign, and is now considered a "national treasure" of Nepal because of her support. She is an advocate for a number of charities and animal welfare groups such as CIWF and Viva!. She hardly needs to resurrect her career with so much going on in her life already but I'm sure she could walk into any role she wanted to play if she simply expressed an interest that she'd like to play it. Producers would bite her hand off to land her as they know she's such a massive draw for them. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"i no god knows how he survived but like u say wot a guy deserved that gong well and truely " "One gutsy ghurka if you ask me. Well deserving of his award. " The truth, and battle plans, rarely survive the first contact with the enemy. I don't know what happened out there that day and, judging by the inter_iews he gave, he's not 100% sure either. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The Lumley intervention did no good whatsoever and may well have harmed the enlistment numbers in Nepal, but there's no doubt she meant well - or she had a career to resurrect Always with the pessimism. " Always with the realism, regardless of who it doesn't suit. "Joanna Lumley has spoken out as a human rights activist for Survival International and the Gurkha Justice Campaign, and is now considered a "national treasure" of Nepal because of her support. She is an advocate for a number of charities and animal welfare groups such as CIWF and Viva!. She hardly needs to resurrect her career with so much going on in her life already but I'm sure she could walk into any role she wanted to play if she simply expressed an interest that she'd like to play it. Producers would bite her hand off to land her as they know she's such a massive draw for them." The last time - after she played Purdey - she was a massive draw, was when she got her kit off for Comic Relief. Quite attractive in its own way but the very last thing the Nepalis would approve of. She's past her sell-by date and she knows it. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The point I was making, badly, was that there's no actual requirement to die. It's not, by definition, a posthumous award." I know it isn't an exclusively posthumous award. I was being flippant as I think many acts of bravery have deserved the VC but haven't got it. The posthumous VC was first awarded in 1907 and to date only 1357 VCs have been awarded. I guess they must analyse the circumstances surrounding a potential awardee and give it if it meets certain criteria. I'm just guessing at that though as I don't know what qualifies one person for it and not another seemingly equally deserving recipient. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" I know it isn't an exclusively posthumous award. I was being flippant ........" Flippant? About the UK's highest award 'For Valour'? You sure you don't want to delete that comment? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" I know it isn't an exclusively posthumous award. I was being flippant ........ Flippant? About the UK's highest award 'For Valour'? You sure you don't want to delete that comment?" ffs acc dont take one thread into another. flippant isnt disrespectful,it's just flippant mate. it's the british way. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" I know it isn't an exclusively posthumous award. I was being flippant ........ Flippant? About the UK's highest award 'For Valour'? You sure you don't want to delete that comment? ffs acc dont take one thread into another. flippant isnt disrespectful,it's just flippant mate. it's the british way." Aw he's ok. Quite harmless really. He'll be going back in his little toybox soon anyway. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Isnt this thread great. It starts off with the tale of a brave soldier, we have online battle from two guys who are arguing over who can get the VC, and ends on if Joanna Lumley is past her sell by date. Its brill " Yup, it's called living in a free society - one of the things that brave ghurka was fighting to protect. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The point I was making, badly, was that there's no actual requirement to die. It's not, by definition, a posthumous award. I know it isn't an exclusively posthumous award. I was being flippant as I think many acts of bravery have deserved the VC but haven't got it. The posthumous VC was first awarded in 1907 and to date only 1357 VCs have been awarded. I guess they must analyse the circumstances surrounding a potential awardee and give it if it meets certain criteria. I'm just guessing at that though as I don't know what qualifies one person for it and not another seemingly equally deserving recipient." As wishy says, the original Royal Warrant for the VC did not make contingency for a posthumous award. Therefore, it could be argued that performing acts of gallantry in "the face of the enemy" and surviving was a pre-requisite. Following public and parliamentary pressure posthumous awards were first made in 1907. One quarter of VC recipients during WW1 were decorated posthumously. I have heard, and been told, that contrary to common opinion, there is indeed a sliding scale of gallantry. This is manifest in the awards for gallantry. Victoria Cross = Level 1, Conspicuous Gallantry Cross [which replaced the DSC & DSO]= Level 2, DSC/MC/DFC = Level 3 and Mention in Dispatches = Level 4. I have also been told that the level of gallantry is calculated by the chances of survival expressed as a percentage but I can't find anything to back this up. I do know that the process for nominations, having been involved in it, is extremely rigorous. Tangible, detailed evidence has to be submitted by a subject matter expert and corroborated by other expert witnesses, on occasion even including the enemy on the receiving end. Whichever way you look at it I can state with some certainty that; 1. The Gurkhas are magnificent, loyal fighting men. After all we got them onside only after they had battered the East India Company to a standstill over two years. 2. One does not receive any of these awards for cutting oneself shaving 3. The actions required to be awarded any of these medals, in particular, means that ones chances of survival before and during those actions are slim. Congratulations to Sarn't Dipprasad Pun. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |