Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to The Lounge |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Some people on here have serious attitude problems. You are talking to them one minute, you get something going but still have nothing actually fully organised yet. You come back later and they have totally U-turned on the entire thing and are now insulting you calling you a timewaster. Well I'm sorry but... it's your loss. " Moral of the story is this .... Fully organise if that's what both parties want , don't dilly dally around for too long . And it's no ones loss if they change their mind . | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Some people on here have serious attitude problems. You are talking to them one minute, you get something going but still have nothing actually fully organised yet. You come back later and they have totally U-turned on the entire thing and are now insulting you calling you a timewaster. Well I'm sorry but... it's your loss. Moral of the story is this .... Fully organise if that's what both parties want , don't dilly dally around for too long . And it's no ones loss if they change their mind ." No... you are misunderstanding me. Sorry. We wasn't meant to be jumping to organise anything. I'm talking about attitude and the way people speak to others. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Some people on here have serious attitude problems. You are talking to them one minute, you get something going but still have nothing actually fully organised yet. You come back later and they have totally U-turned on the entire thing and are now insulting you calling you a timewaster. Well I'm sorry but... it's your loss. Moral of the story is this .... Fully organise if that's what both parties want , don't dilly dally around for too long . And it's no ones loss if they change their mind . No... you are misunderstanding me. Sorry. We wasn't meant to be jumping to organise anything. I'm talking about attitude and the way people speak to others." Ah I see ... Well they may have misinterpreted your desires from your profile ? A sissy sub would often like to be spoken to in a degrading way . Be careful what you wish for ....  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There are a lot of unstable people on here. You're lucky you found out before you met." You are telling me......I've lost count of the number of "damaged" people (mostly women sadly) that I have come across/met/made friends with....some of the dark secrets that come out over time can be quite shocking. Not sure if it is representative of society as a whole or not....? It has certainly opened my eyes over the years! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There are a lot of unstable people on here. You're lucky you found out before you met. You are telling me......I've lost count of the number of "damaged" people (mostly women sadly) that I have come across/met/made friends with....some of the dark secrets that come out over time can be quite shocking. Not sure if it is representative of society as a whole or not....? It has certainly opened my eyes over the years!" I think they gravitate towards internet sites because they don't have to interact with society in person. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Some people on here have serious attitude problems. You are talking to them one minute, you get something going but still have nothing actually fully organised yet. You come back later and they have totally U-turned on the entire thing and are now insulting you calling you a timewaster. Well I'm sorry but... it's your loss. Moral of the story is this .... Fully organise if that's what both parties want , don't dilly dally around for too long . And it's no ones loss if they change their mind . No... you are misunderstanding me. Sorry. We wasn't meant to be jumping to organise anything. I'm talking about attitude and the way people speak to others. Ah I see ... Well they may have misinterpreted your desires from your profile ? A sissy sub would often like to be spoken to in a degrading way . Be careful what you wish for .... "Lol... of course I like being spoken to in a degrading manner for fun. But this was just a little weird behaviour. I think anyway. I was clear about my feelings from the beginning. Oh well... no harm done and I'm moving on. I don't see why anyone would need both sides of the story here anyway. I haven't named names. I'm just talking about my experience. As far as I see it, the moral to this story is... some people are out only to do you harm. Don't ever lower your standards too much or it may bite you... one way or another. I'm glad it didn't take him long to show me his true colours. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There are a lot of unstable people on here. You're lucky you found out before you met. You are telling me......I've lost count of the number of "damaged" people (mostly women sadly) that I have come across/met/made friends with....some of the dark secrets that come out over time can be quite shocking. Not sure if it is representative of society as a whole or not....? It has certainly opened my eyes over the years! I think they gravitate towards internet sites because they don't have to interact with society in person. " I know! But not us three hey ? We're untouched. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The problem is ...ladies see something they like and start chatting ..then someone else shows an interest and they think ooooh...and start chatting to them for an hour then the first man feels as if hes being ignored and gets impatient......its a giant sweet shop here for the ladies......Continuity is the key." So we can only have one person we're chatting to at a time? If we ignore someone we're rude. If we try to chat to everyone, or even a few people, who interest us (or with whom we enjoy chatting) and someone feels he's not getting enough attention, we're rude. If we don't reply immediately to a message yet they can see we're online, we're rude. What are we supposed to do if we're chatting to someone and someone else we're interested in messages us? We can't not reply (besides, we're interested, we want to reply) but if we reply the person expects us to chat. Do we give out tickets like at a supermarket deli counter? Besides, surely it's up to us with whom we chat? It's not for guys to decide if we're giving them adequate attention? Bear in mind we may get more messages than men but the men choose when we get them, not us. We have to manage them as well as we can. Serious question, what do you expect us to do if we're chatting and someone new mails us? Bear in mind if we're chatting we will show as online, which encourages more men to message us because they think we're looking for a meet or are online so they'll get a fast response. It's a killer when you log on to try to clear a backlog of messages but you get as many, or more, as you're dealing with arriving from the guys who see you're online. I tried to clear down 50 unread messages a couple of days ago. After an hour I'd dealt with quite a few but had 64 unread messages. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The problem is ...ladies see something they like and start chatting ..then someone else shows an interest and they think ooooh...and start chatting to them for an hour then the first man feels as if hes being ignored and gets impatient......its a giant sweet shop here for the ladies......Continuity is the key. So we can only have one person we're chatting to at a time? If we ignore someone we're rude. If we try to chat to everyone, or even a few people, who interest us (or with whom we enjoy chatting) and someone feels he's not getting enough attention, we're rude. If we don't reply immediately to a message yet they can see we're online, we're rude. What are we supposed to do if we're chatting to someone and someone else we're interested in messages us? We can't not reply (besides, we're interested, we want to reply) but if we reply the person expects us to chat. Do we give out tickets like at a supermarket deli counter? Besides, surely it's up to us with whom we chat? It's not for guys to decide if we're giving them adequate attention? Bear in mind we may get more messages than men but the men choose when we get them, not us. We have to manage them as well as we can. Serious question, what do you expect us to do if we're chatting and someone new mails us? Bear in mind if we're chatting we will show as online, which encourages more men to message us because they think we're looking for a meet or are online so they'll get a fast response. It's a killer when you log on to try to clear a backlog of messages but you get as many, or more, as you're dealing with arriving from the guys who see you're online. I tried to clear down 50 unread messages a couple of days ago. After an hour I'd dealt with quite a few but had 64 unread messages." I'm too busy cleaning the oven to reply to you ......and its more entertaining. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Some people on here have serious attitude problems. You are talking to them one minute, you get something going but still have nothing actually fully organised yet. You come back later and they have totally U-turned on the entire thing and are now insulting you calling you a timewaster. Well I'm sorry but... it's your loss. Moral of the story is this .... Fully organise if that's what both parties want , don't dilly dally around for too long . And it's no ones loss if they change their mind . No... you are misunderstanding me. Sorry. We wasn't meant to be jumping to organise anything. I'm talking about attitude and the way people speak to others. Ah I see ... Well they may have misinterpreted your desires from your profile ? A sissy sub would often like to be spoken to in a degrading way . Be careful what you wish for .... "pmsl  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There are a lot of unstable people on here. You're lucky you found out before you met." Totally. We were arranging a meet with a guy for something very specific. Then he starts going on about everything else we're going to do when we get to his. I'm like 'calm your tits, mate. We're only after what we've said.' He carries on. We back out. Now we're time wasters and blocked. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The problem is ...ladies see something they like and start chatting ..then someone else shows an interest and they think ooooh...and start chatting to them for an hour then the first man feels as if hes being ignored and gets impatient......its a giant sweet shop here for the ladies......Continuity is the key. So we can only have one person we're chatting to at a time? If we ignore someone we're rude. If we try to chat to everyone, or even a few people, who interest us (or with whom we enjoy chatting) and someone feels he's not getting enough attention, we're rude. If we don't reply immediately to a message yet they can see we're online, we're rude. What are we supposed to do if we're chatting to someone and someone else we're interested in messages us? We can't not reply (besides, we're interested, we want to reply) but if we reply the person expects us to chat. Do we give out tickets like at a supermarket deli counter? Besides, surely it's up to us with whom we chat? It's not for guys to decide if we're giving them adequate attention? Bear in mind we may get more messages than men but the men choose when we get them, not us. We have to manage them as well as we can. Serious question, what do you expect us to do if we're chatting and someone new mails us? Bear in mind if we're chatting we will show as online, which encourages more men to message us because they think we're looking for a meet or are online so they'll get a fast response. It's a killer when you log on to try to clear a backlog of messages but you get as many, or more, as you're dealing with arriving from the guys who see you're online. I tried to clear down 50 unread messages a couple of days ago. After an hour I'd dealt with quite a few but had 64 unread messages. I'm too busy cleaning the oven to reply to you ......and its more entertaining. " So you don't actually have an answer then. I didn't think so. Expecting us to focus on one person at a time AND not ignore anyone is kinda unrealistic. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The problem is ...ladies see something they like and start chatting ..then someone else shows an interest and they think ooooh...and start chatting to them for an hour then the first man feels as if hes being ignored and gets impatient......its a giant sweet shop here for the ladies......Continuity is the key. So we can only have one person we're chatting to at a time? If we ignore someone we're rude. If we try to chat to everyone, or even a few people, who interest us (or with whom we enjoy chatting) and someone feels he's not getting enough attention, we're rude. If we don't reply immediately to a message yet they can see we're online, we're rude. What are we supposed to do if we're chatting to someone and someone else we're interested in messages us? We can't not reply (besides, we're interested, we want to reply) but if we reply the person expects us to chat. Do we give out tickets like at a supermarket deli counter? Besides, surely it's up to us with whom we chat? It's not for guys to decide if we're giving them adequate attention? Bear in mind we may get more messages than men but the men choose when we get them, not us. We have to manage them as well as we can. Serious question, what do you expect us to do if we're chatting and someone new mails us? Bear in mind if we're chatting we will show as online, which encourages more men to message us because they think we're looking for a meet or are online so they'll get a fast response. It's a killer when you log on to try to clear a backlog of messages but you get as many, or more, as you're dealing with arriving from the guys who see you're online. I tried to clear down 50 unread messages a couple of days ago. After an hour I'd dealt with quite a few but had 64 unread messages. I'm too busy cleaning the oven to reply to you ......and its more entertaining. " Are you using the one with the plastic bag to put your trays in ? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Some people on here have serious attitude problems. You are talking to them one minute, you get something going but still have nothing actually fully organised yet. You come back later and they have totally U-turned on the entire thing and are now insulting you calling you a timewaster. Well I'm sorry but... it's your loss. Moral of the story is this .... Fully organise if that's what both parties want , don't dilly dally around for too long . And it's no ones loss if they change their mind . No... you are misunderstanding me. Sorry. We wasn't meant to be jumping to organise anything. I'm talking about attitude and the way people speak to others." Some people are just rude. I see it as a good thing as it means I don't waste my time meeting them. 
When they've had a wank they aren't as nicey nicey. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The problem is ...ladies see something they like and start chatting ..then someone else shows an interest and they think ooooh...and start chatting to them for an hour then the first man feels as if hes being ignored and gets impatient......its a giant sweet shop here for the ladies......Continuity is the key. So we can only have one person we're chatting to at a time? If we ignore someone we're rude. If we try to chat to everyone, or even a few people, who interest us (or with whom we enjoy chatting) and someone feels he's not getting enough attention, we're rude. If we don't reply immediately to a message yet they can see we're online, we're rude. What are we supposed to do if we're chatting to someone and someone else we're interested in messages us? We can't not reply (besides, we're interested, we want to reply) but if we reply the person expects us to chat. Do we give out tickets like at a supermarket deli counter? Besides, surely it's up to us with whom we chat? It's not for guys to decide if we're giving them adequate attention? Bear in mind we may get more messages than men but the men choose when we get them, not us. We have to manage them as well as we can. Serious question, what do you expect us to do if we're chatting and someone new mails us? Bear in mind if we're chatting we will show as online, which encourages more men to message us because they think we're looking for a meet or are online so they'll get a fast response. It's a killer when you log on to try to clear a backlog of messages but you get as many, or more, as you're dealing with arriving from the guys who see you're online. I tried to clear down 50 unread messages a couple of days ago. After an hour I'd dealt with quite a few but had 64 unread messages. I'm too busy cleaning the oven to reply to you ......and its more entertaining. Are you using the one with the plastic bag to put your trays in ?" yeah ...ive used them before...but be careful they are very caustic. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The problem is ...ladies see something they like and start chatting ..then someone else shows an interest and they think ooooh...and start chatting to them for an hour then the first man feels as if hes being ignored and gets impatient......its a giant sweet shop here for the ladies......Continuity is the key. So we can only have one person we're chatting to at a time? If we ignore someone we're rude. If we try to chat to everyone, or even a few people, who interest us (or with whom we enjoy chatting) and someone feels he's not getting enough attention, we're rude. If we don't reply immediately to a message yet they can see we're online, we're rude. What are we supposed to do if we're chatting to someone and someone else we're interested in messages us? We can't not reply (besides, we're interested, we want to reply) but if we reply the person expects us to chat. Do we give out tickets like at a supermarket deli counter? Besides, surely it's up to us with whom we chat? It's not for guys to decide if we're giving them adequate attention? Bear in mind we may get more messages than men but the men choose when we get them, not us. We have to manage them as well as we can. Serious question, what do you expect us to do if we're chatting and someone new mails us? Bear in mind if we're chatting we will show as online, which encourages more men to message us because they think we're looking for a meet or are online so they'll get a fast response. It's a killer when you log on to try to clear a backlog of messages but you get as many, or more, as you're dealing with arriving from the guys who see you're online. I tried to clear down 50 unread messages a couple of days ago. After an hour I'd dealt with quite a few but had 64 unread messages. I'm too busy cleaning the oven to reply to you ......and its more entertaining. Are you using the one with the plastic bag to put your trays in ? yeah ...ive used them before...but be careful they are very caustic." Thanks for the tip. Maybe next time I can have the rest of it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think sometimes like attracts like behaviour wise. Not saying it's the case this time OP but when I've seen others have a rant on about people's behaviour in the forums I often think.....hmmmmm I wonder why, not!" 100% this  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think sometimes like attracts like behaviour wise. Not saying it's the case this time OP but when I've seen others have a rant on about people's behaviour in the forums I often think.....hmmmmm I wonder why, not!" Haha I see. Well... I wasn't ranting. I was just speaking about my experience. Wondered if anyone else had similar stuff happen to them. I now know they have - I'm new here you see. But this is good... you'd be the exact kind of person who I'd want to be avoiding then? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'll have to get this clasp fixed on mine" You only have the one? 
You are clearly a man pretending to be a woman.
Everyone knows real women have stacks of handbags. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'll have to get this clasp fixed on mine You only have the one?
You are clearly a man pretending to be a woman.
Everyone knows real women have stacks of handbags."Shit......... Rumbled.  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think sometimes like attracts like behaviour wise. Not saying it's the case this time OP but when I've seen others have a rant on about people's behaviour in the forums I often think.....hmmmmm I wonder why, not! Haha I see. Well... I wasn't ranting. I was just speaking about my experience. Wondered if anyone else had similar stuff happen to them. I now know they have - I'm new here you see. But this is good... you'd be the exact kind of person who I'd want to be avoiding then?" Her comment was not pointed at you. Welcome and you will see over time that the forums are full of ranters about other swingers and usually they repeat the same issues over and over again. Why, they either have zero self awareness and don't see it is them, not others or their preferred position is victim | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think sometimes like attracts like behaviour wise. Not saying it's the case this time OP but when I've seen others have a rant on about people's behaviour in the forums I often think.....hmmmmm I wonder why, not! Haha I see. Well... I wasn't ranting. I was just speaking about my experience. Wondered if anyone else had similar stuff happen to them. I now know they have - I'm new here you see. But this is good... you'd be the exact kind of person who I'd want to be avoiding then?" That's why I said it maybe not the case this time OP, (that's you) And yes I expect I am exactly the kind of person you'd want to avoid. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think sometimes like attracts like behaviour wise. Not saying it's the case this time OP but when I've seen others have a rant on about people's behaviour in the forums I often think.....hmmmmm I wonder why, not! Haha I see. Well... I wasn't ranting. I was just speaking about my experience. Wondered if anyone else had similar stuff happen to them. I now know they have - I'm new here you see. But this is good... you'd be the exact kind of person who I'd want to be avoiding then? That's why I said it maybe not the case this time OP, (that's you) And yes I expect I am exactly the kind of person you'd want to avoid. " Sorry I misunderstood you then. But okay... well... how am I supposed to avoid you when you are posting on my thread? Lol. Oh my god. Lets leave this thread to die. I'm over it now. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
