Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Crocodiles don't actually move very much so don't need tons of space. They remain very still for long periods of time. The lions and tigers at Longleat are free range as far as possible. I agree animals should be given more space though when kept in captivity. " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is it really right that animals are kept in cages in zoos etc,i think its cruel keeping ,elephants,tigers and gorillas,rhinoceros,giraffes,away from there natural environment,Bristol zoo had a polar bear that went mad ,just paced up and down in a small pen and eventually died,longleat with the tigers and lions ,these are animals but also beasts and will kill,Bristol zoo has crocodiles which are kept in a glass covered cage with a small pool ,its wrong," Yes it's right. It says so in the bible. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yes its ok in zoos etc but give the enough space to move around ,the gorillas at bristol zoo ans the lions are kept in small places." Its not good they aren't meant to be there just to be gawped at, they don't like it. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Or we could just let them go so the poachers can get them ? Stop breeding rare breeds so we can keep them from extinction? Always different sides to the story ?? " Those things don't make it right though, shit happens. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think zoos should be banned, I think longleats ok though." | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think zoos should be banned, I think longleats ok though." So why should all zoo's except Longleat be banned? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The only animals I liked to watch were the monkeys at Longleat and monkey world, and small animals like ducks and rabbits. My son was never that interested in the big animals either. You can see them on telly or the internet." By tgat logic we may as well do away with art galleries and museums? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The only animals I liked to watch were the monkeys at Longleat and monkey world, and small animals like ducks and rabbits. My son was never that interested in the big animals either. You can see them on telly or the internet. By tgat logic we may as well do away with art galleries and museums? " Yes we could. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think zoos should be banned, I think longleats ok though. So why should all zoo's except Longleat be banned?" If you havnt been there google it and see for yourself. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think zoos should be banned, I think longleats ok though. So why should all zoo's except Longleat be banned?" longleat is a safari park its huge and animals are not caged,they roam free the lions and tigers are in packs ,in bristol zoo they are in a very small environment,but these wild animals should be in the wild. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Zoos and safari parks are used to protect and breed endangered species. So its not all about them being kept behind bars. A lot of the animals have been rescued from poachers or where found as orphans and would of died. If it wasn't for zoos and safari parks then some animals would be near extinction. " Have you been to bristol zoo ,yes I'm not saying they are not looked after,just the way they keep them in such small places | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The only animals I liked to watch were the monkeys at Longleat and monkey world, and small animals like ducks and rabbits. My son was never that interested in the big animals either. You can see them on telly or the internet." We won't be able to see them once extinct in the wild. It's a bit of a catch 22. By people paying to see them, the zoos can afford to do conservation work. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think zoos should be banned, I think longleats ok though. So why should all zoo's except Longleat be banned? If you havnt been there google it and see for yourself." I'm just wondering how you can dismiss all zoo's yourself and then make an exception. What are you basing that on? Why should London zoo (as an example) closedown but Longleat is okay? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think zoos should be banned, I think longleats ok though. So why should all zoo's except Longleat be banned? If you havnt been there google it and see for yourself. I'm just wondering how you can dismiss all zoo's yourself and then make an exception. What are you basing that on? Why should London zoo (as an example) closedown but Longleat is okay?" She did comment about that it was because Longleat is a Safari Park and free roaming on a larger scale in packs.. not one or two of each animal | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The only animals I liked to watch were the monkeys at Longleat and monkey world, and small animals like ducks and rabbits. My son was never that interested in the big animals either. You can see them on telly or the internet. We won't be able to see them once extinct in the wild. It's a bit of a catch 22. By people paying to see them, the zoos can afford to do conservation work." I don't think it matters if they become extinct though, its not up to us to intefere. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The only animals I liked to watch were the monkeys at Longleat and monkey world, and small animals like ducks and rabbits. My son was never that interested in the big animals either. You can see them on telly or the internet. We won't be able to see them once extinct in the wild. It's a bit of a catch 22. By people paying to see them, the zoos can afford to do conservation work. I don't think it matters if they become extinct though, its not up to us to intefere." We already have interfered. That's what is driving them to extinction. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The only animals I liked to watch were the monkeys at Longleat and monkey world, and small animals like ducks and rabbits. My son was never that interested in the big animals either. You can see them on telly or the internet. We won't be able to see them once extinct in the wild. It's a bit of a catch 22. By people paying to see them, the zoos can afford to do conservation work. I don't think it matters if they become extinct though, its not up to us to intefere. We already have interfered. That's what is driving them to extinction." Yes I know but that doesn't make it alright. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The only animals I liked to watch were the monkeys at Longleat and monkey world, and small animals like ducks and rabbits. My son was never that interested in the big animals either. You can see them on telly or the internet. We won't be able to see them once extinct in the wild. It's a bit of a catch 22. By people paying to see them, the zoos can afford to do conservation work. I don't think it matters if they become extinct though, its not up to us to intefere. We already have interfered. That's what is driving them to extinction. Yes I know but that doesn't make it alright." So we carry on unabated until all other life forms on the planet are extinct? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" I don't think it matters if they become extinct though, its not up to us to intefere. We already have interfered. That's what is driving them to extinction." I was just going to add that point too. Also evolution would take a long time to occour naturally in the wild, but human intervention has already culled so many and not for the food chain either. If all the predators were killed for 'trophies'.. how would the natural food chain be effected in the wild? Be over run and would be out of control. I think there can always be improvements when it comes to animals in captivity however i think its lesser of the two evils when it comes to these wonderful creatures going out of extinction | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The only animals I liked to watch were the monkeys at Longleat and monkey world, and small animals like ducks and rabbits. My son was never that interested in the big animals either. You can see them on telly or the internet. We won't be able to see them once extinct in the wild. It's a bit of a catch 22. By people paying to see them, the zoos can afford to do conservation work. I don't think it matters if they become extinct though, its not up to us to intefere. We already have interfered. That's what is driving them to extinction. Yes I know but that doesn't make it alright. So we carry on unabated until all other life forms on the planet are extinct?" That's not likely to happen to all animals though. Sometimes in certain curcumstances its better for some to die than live a life of suffering. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Crocodiles don't actually move very much so don't need tons of space. They remain very still for long periods of time. The lions and tigers at Longleat are free range as far as possible. I agree animals should be given more space though when kept in captivity. " And the ones in Bristol are Dawarf Crocodiles | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I feel Zoos and safari parks that help provide conservational/educational programmes offer a valuable service.... I've been lucky enough to travel the world and visit many places and see animals in the wild. But think it would be utterly arrogant to suggest that those people who don't have the same oppertunity should be denied the option to see those same creatures in well run zoos because of sentimental objections raised by individuals who've become overly precious about the merits of providing wild animals with a greater level of compassion than we afford domestic animals which are routinely farmed for food... " But humans are arrogant, the fact animals are kept in zoos for our entertainment proves that | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You got the tigers balls being used for aphrodisiacs,elephants killed for the ivory ,whales for the blubber,all for mankind ,and they are such beautiful animals and yes one day they will be extinct " No no whales are only allowed to be killed for scientific research now days, Japan's quoter for last year was 10,000 whales all in the name of science | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" I am torn about zoo's and wildlife parks though. But sadly we live in a world where so many species are endangered we need captive breeding to.protect them " Sings *isnt it hydronic* That we now have to captive breed certain species to stop them becoming extinct because we drove them to the bring of extinction in the first place | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I dont think its ok to see a polar bear pacing up and down ,going round and round ,it was so very sad ,and the poor bear died and he wasn't old,thank god they took away the monkey temple that's was awful to,not even one tree for them to play on ,just concrete " This was over 25 years ago, I think most zoo's realise that keeping them in captivity is wrong now. There's only 1 at Edinburgh now and it's clear they have no idea what to do with him and very few in captivity anywhere on the world. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I saw a bird in an aviary st a zoo and there were like 300 left in the wild. It would be irresponsible of us to allow them to go extinct so by conserving them and starting a breeding programme, the species might survive. If this means they are kept locked up, then so be it. It's for their own protection. " Would you rather die having been a free bird for a short while or live in a cage for a long while ? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I saw a bird in an aviary st a zoo and there were like 300 left in the wild. It would be irresponsible of us to allow them to go extinct so by conserving them and starting a breeding programme, the species might survive. If this means they are kept locked up, then so be it. It's for their own protection. Would you rather die having been a free bird for a short while or live in a cage for a long while ? " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think on the whole, the majority of zoos and safari parks these days have some sort of breeding programme in place in order to save endangered animals/birds/reptiles etc from extinction, so for that we should be thankful ..." Yes i agree just please give them bigger enclosures enough space for them to move around more,i saw the giraffes at bristol zoo a while ago,and where they were put at night was about as big as a stable. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I saw a bird in an aviary st a zoo and there were like 300 left in the wild. It would be irresponsible of us to allow them to go extinct so by conserving them and starting a breeding programme, the species might survive. If this means they are kept locked up, then so be it. It's for their own protection. Would you rather die having been a free bird for a short while or live in a cage for a long while ? " It's too much of an unlikely scenario for me to give a factual (rather than fatuous) reply to, really. I'm not a fan of killing a species to extinction and if that included me as a human, then caged, I suppose. Besides which, I'd be put to stud and have to fuck the remaining ladies. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I dont think its ok to see a polar bear pacing up and down ,going round and round ,it was so very sad ,and the poor bear died and he wasn't old,thank god they took away the monkey temple that's was awful to,not even one tree for them to play on ,just concrete This was over 25 years ago, I think most zoo's realise that keeping them in captivity is wrong now. There's only 1 at Edinburgh now and it's clear they have no idea what to do with him and very few in captivity anywhere on the world. " Yes it was ,but i remember the bear very well,there were two ,then they got parted and the other went mad,Bristol zoo is not very big at all to have these large animals in, | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I feel Zoos and safari parks that help provide conservational/educational programmes offer a valuable service.... I've been lucky enough to travel the world and visit many places and see animals in the wild. But think it would be utterly arrogant to suggest that those people who don't have the same oppertunity should be denied the option to see those same creatures in well run zoos because of sentimental objections raised by individuals who've become overly precious about the merits of providing wild animals with a greater level of compassion than we afford domestic animals which are routinely farmed for food... But humans are arrogant, the fact animals are kept in zoos for our entertainment proves that " Yes Human are arrogant I don't dispute that... That's why we introduce intensive breed patters to produce animals we like to eat and we use products derived from their dead bodies to furnish our lifestyle choices without real care of compassion that can be measured in a way that support some animals deserve preferential treatment..... Which to my way of thinking basically nullifies the argument for eliminating zoos that help preserve the diversity of life on this planet... I'm a vegetarian btw...... but not for moral reasons... ..... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I feel Zoos and safari parks that help provide conservational/educational programmes offer a valuable service.... I've been lucky enough to travel the world and visit many places and see animals in the wild. But think it would be utterly arrogant to suggest that those people who don't have the same oppertunity should be denied the option to see those same creatures in well run zoos because of sentimental objections raised by individuals who've become overly precious about the merits of providing wild animals with a greater level of compassion than we afford domestic animals which are routinely farmed for food... But humans are arrogant, the fact animals are kept in zoos for our entertainment proves that Yes Human are arrogant I don't dispute that... That's why we introduce intensive breed patters to produce animals we like to eat and we use products derived from their dead bodies to furnish our lifestyle choices without real care of compassion that can be measured in a way that support some animals deserve preferential treatment..... Which to my way of thinking basically nullifies the argument for eliminating zoos that help preserve the diversity of life on this planet... I'm a vegetarian btw...... but not for moral reasons... ..... " I don't eat, wear or used products tested on animals and that includes medication so you'll get no arguments from me on that | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is it really right that animals are kept in cages in zoos etc,i think its cruel keeping ,elephants,tigers and gorillas,rhinoceros,giraffes,away from there natural environment,Bristol zoo had a polar bear that went mad ,just paced up and down in a small pen and eventually died,longleat with the tigers and lions ,these are animals but also beasts and will kill,Bristol zoo has crocodiles which are kept in a glass covered cage with a small pool ,its wrong," Is it any different from keeping house cats & dogs | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I also saw a televised Hose of Commons debate. That was quite zoo like. " I am now imagining members of the hose of commons.......being hosed ! Lol xxx | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is it really right that animals are kept in cages in zoos etc,i think its cruel keeping ,elephants,tigers and gorillas,rhinoceros,giraffes,away from there natural environment,Bristol zoo had a polar bear that went mad ,just paced up and down in a small pen and eventually died,longleat with the tigers and lions ,these are animals but also beasts and will kill,Bristol zoo has crocodiles which are kept in a glass covered cage with a small pool ,its wrong, Is it any different from keeping house cats & dogs" I think it is as dogs and cats are domestic pets you couldn't keep an elephant in your front room and say ,sit boy lol | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I feel Zoos and safari parks that help provide conservational/educational programmes offer a valuable service.... I've been lucky enough to travel the world and visit many places and see animals in the wild. But think it would be utterly arrogant to suggest that those people who don't have the same oppertunity should be denied the option to see those same creatures in well run zoos because of sentimental objections raised by individuals who've become overly precious about the merits of providing wild animals with a greater level of compassion than we afford domestic animals which are routinely farmed for food... But humans are arrogant, the fact animals are kept in zoos for our entertainment proves that Yes Human are arrogant I don't dispute that... That's why we introduce intensive breed patters to produce animals we like to eat and we use products derived from their dead bodies to furnish our lifestyle choices without real care of compassion that can be measured in a way that support some animals deserve preferential treatment..... Which to my way of thinking basically nullifies the argument for eliminating zoos that help preserve the diversity of life on this planet... I'm a vegetarian btw...... but not for moral reasons... ..... I don't eat, wear or used products tested on animals and that includes medication so you'll get no arguments from me on that " I'm not 100% comfortable with everything that goes on in zoo's .... I'm not even championing the concept of zoo's, but in reality I've never heard anyone offer a practical alternative that doesn't dismiss that society as a whole willing accepts the exploitation of animals which has remained pretty much a constant throughout the history and development of human kind ..... and yet here we are an allegedly civilised species and we allow other humans to die who would otherwise live if we had any true compassion.... Ooo'er yikes..... OMG..... I'm outta here.... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I feel Zoos and safari parks that help provide conservational/educational programmes offer a valuable service.... I've been lucky enough to travel the world and visit many places and see animals in the wild. But think it would be utterly arrogant to suggest that those people who don't have the same oppertunity should be denied the option to see those same creatures in well run zoos because of sentimental objections raised by individuals who've become overly precious about the merits of providing wild animals with a greater level of compassion than we afford domestic animals which are routinely farmed for food... But humans are arrogant, the fact animals are kept in zoos for our entertainment proves that Yes Human are arrogant I don't dispute that... That's why we introduce intensive breed patters to produce animals we like to eat and we use products derived from their dead bodies to furnish our lifestyle choices without real care of compassion that can be measured in a way that support some animals deserve preferential treatment..... Which to my way of thinking basically nullifies the argument for eliminating zoos that help preserve the diversity of life on this planet... I'm a vegetarian btw...... but not for moral reasons... ..... I don't eat, wear or used products tested on animals and that includes medication so you'll get no arguments from me on that I'm not 100% comfortable with everything that goes on in zoo's .... I'm not even championing the concept of zoo's, but in reality I've never heard anyone offer a practical alternative that doesn't dismiss that society as a whole willing accepts the exploitation of animals which has remained pretty much a constant throughout the history and development of human kind ..... and yet here we are an allegedly civilised species and we allow other humans to die who would otherwise live if we had any true compassion.... Ooo'er yikes..... OMG..... I'm outta here.... Its a very cruel world we live in unfortunately . " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is it really right that animals are kept in cages in zoos etc,i think its cruel keeping ,elephants,tigers and gorillas,rhinoceros,giraffes,away from there natural environment,Bristol zoo had a polar bear that went mad ,just paced up and down in a small pen and eventually died,longleat with the tigers and lions ,these are animals but also beasts and will kill,Bristol zoo has crocodiles which are kept in a glass covered cage with a small pool ,its wrong, Is it any different from keeping house cats & dogs I think it is as dogs and cats are domestic pets you couldn't keep an elephant in your front room and say ,sit boy lol " that all depends on how big your home and property is there are many people who can afford and will keep animals in good condition, plenty of exercise room, regular vet visits, health checks and proper diet, and then you get the ones who cant even look after a cat or dog properly zoo's & safari parks can be okay if properly run, same with national parks, Yellowstone is a good example although you do get the occasional bear and wolf who wander out and threaten communities and humans | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is it really right that animals are kept in cages in zoos etc,i think its cruel keeping ,elephants,tigers and gorillas,rhinoceros,giraffes,away from there natural environment,Bristol zoo had a polar bear that went mad ,just paced up and down in a small pen and eventually died,longleat with the tigers and lions ,these are animals but also beasts and will kill,Bristol zoo has crocodiles which are kept in a glass covered cage with a small pool ,its wrong, Is it any different from keeping house cats & dogs I think it is as dogs and cats are domestic pets you couldn't keep an elephant in your front room and say ,sit boy lol that all depends on how big your home and property is there are many people who can afford and will keep animals in good condition, plenty of exercise room, regular vet visits, health checks and proper diet, and then you get the ones who cant even look after a cat or dog properly zoo's & safari parks can be okay if properly run, same with national parks, Yellowstone is a good example although you do get the occasional bear and wolf who wander out and threaten communities and humans" Safari parks are great ,the animals can run around they have space ,but a rhinoceros or an elephant in a zoo ,they are to small for these beautiful creatures. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is it really right that animals are kept in cages in zoos etc,i think its cruel keeping ,elephants,tigers and gorillas,rhinoceros,giraffes,away from there natural environment,Bristol zoo had a polar bear that went mad ,just paced up and down in a small pen and eventually died,longleat with the tigers and lions ,these are animals but also beasts and will kill,Bristol zoo has crocodiles which are kept in a glass covered cage with a small pool ,its wrong, Is it any different from keeping house cats & dogs I think it is as dogs and cats are domestic pets you couldn't keep an elephant in your front room and say ,sit boy lol that all depends on how big your home and property is there are many people who can afford and will keep animals in good condition, plenty of exercise room, regular vet visits, health checks and proper diet, and then you get the ones who cant even look after a cat or dog properly zoo's & safari parks can be okay if properly run, same with national parks, Yellowstone is a good example although you do get the occasional bear and wolf who wander out and threaten communities and humans Safari parks are great ,the animals can run around they have space ,but a rhinoceros or an elephant in a zoo ,they are to small for these beautiful creatures." again that all depends on the Zoo, San Diego zoo was very impressive and provided plenty land for all exhibits | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I feel Zoos and safari parks that help provide conservational/educational programmes offer a valuable service.... I've been lucky enough to travel the world and visit many places and see animals in the wild. But think it would be utterly arrogant to suggest that those people who don't have the same oppertunity should be denied the option to see those same creatures in well run zoos because of sentimental objections raised by individuals who've become overly precious about the merits of providing wild animals with a greater level of compassion than we afford domestic animals which are routinely farmed for food... But humans are arrogant, the fact animals are kept in zoos for our entertainment proves that Yes Human are arrogant I don't dispute that... That's why we introduce intensive breed patters to produce animals we like to eat and we use products derived from their dead bodies to furnish our lifestyle choices without real care of compassion that can be measured in a way that support some animals deserve preferential treatment..... Which to my way of thinking basically nullifies the argument for eliminating zoos that help preserve the diversity of life on this planet... I'm a vegetarian btw...... but not for moral reasons... ..... I don't eat, wear or used products tested on animals and that includes medication so you'll get no arguments from me on that I'm not 100% comfortable with everything that goes on in zoo's .... I'm not even championing the concept of zoo's, but in reality I've never heard anyone offer a practical alternative that doesn't dismiss that society as a whole willing accepts the exploitation of animals which has remained pretty much a constant throughout the history and development of human kind ..... and yet here we are an allegedly civilised species and we allow other humans to die who would otherwise live if we had any true compassion.... Ooo'er yikes..... OMG..... I'm outta here.... Its a very cruel world we live in unfortunately . " Nature itself is cruel..... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"My dream is to stay at longleat for a few days" long leat is a great place ,lots to do there | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |