Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"If you ever come across a couple fighting man hits the woman if you break it up/touch the guy you're about 10 seconds away from getting blindsided by the woman and now you're 5he bad guy" 100% this. Mr here and I once got between a couple where the guy had his hands around Mrs neck. Got abuse from the pair of them and a black eye for my trouble | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"That happened to me too. The guy was beating up on his partner so I stepped in and SHE told me to fuck off." Yep, I've witnessed that! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Should you get involved with that. Was walking down my street lastnite when i heard a woman shouting and a dog barking and it started howling so i walked near the house. A man walked out upset. I asked if he was ok and he told me she drinks and starts bein nasty. I gave him advice and he thanked me. Did i do rite thing?" Do you feel you did the right thing? If yes then you did, it doesn't matter if we think you did or not. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"My dad told me never get involved in domestics and I don't! I've seen situations where the one helping has been turned on by both! No good deed goes unpunished." This. In general. Though I did look out the window once and saw a lad, a big lad at that, punching his girlfriend and her head was banging against the wall behind her from the punch. I thought to myself 'I'm not having that' and put some trainers on and ran out to where they were. The estate where I lived then was a bit of a maze, I ran up several streets looking for them but never found them. Just remembering it now gets me furious at what I saw, I'm the most peaceful lad you'll ever meet but I would have torn that twat apart. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"That happened to me too. The guy was beating up on his partner so I stepped in and SHE told me to fuck off." Is response to everyone saying similar to this- She HAS to stick up for her man out of fear he will beat the shit out of her even worse later on. Abuse victims walk on eggshells all the time. Any little thing can make their abuser mad. You may well get slated by the woman but somewhere inside her she will appreciate the fact that someone helped. It will give her a glimmer of hope that she IS worthy of being liked - even though he tells her she's worthless. Please don't be mad at her. x | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"My dad told me never get involved in domestics and I don't! I've seen situations where the one helping has been turned on by both! No good deed goes unpunished." | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"That happened to me too. The guy was beating up on his partner so I stepped in and SHE told me to fuck off. Is response to everyone saying similar to this- She HAS to stick up for her man out of fear he will beat the shit out of her even worse later on. Abuse victims walk on eggshells all the time. Any little thing can make their abuser mad. You may well get slated by the woman but somewhere inside her she will appreciate the fact that someone helped. It will give her a glimmer of hope that she IS worthy of being liked - even though he tells her she's worthless. Please don't be mad at her. x" Absolutely....abuse is complex | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Should you get involved with that. Was walking down my street lastnite when i heard a woman shouting and a dog barking and it started howling so i walked near the house. A man walked out upset. I asked if he was ok and he told me she drinks and starts bein nasty. I gave him advice and he thanked me. Did i do rite thing?" depends what your advice was | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"My dad told me never get involved in domestics and I don't! I've seen situations where the one helping has been turned on by both! No good deed goes unpunished. This. In general. Though I did look out the window once and saw a lad, a big lad at that, punching his girlfriend and her head was banging against the wall behind her from the punch. I thought to myself 'I'm not having that' and put some trainers on and ran out to where they were. The estate where I lived then was a bit of a maze, I ran up several streets looking for them but never found them. Just remembering it now gets me furious at what I saw, I'm the most peaceful lad you'll ever meet but I would have torn that twat apart." coudnt respond to u tony | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"That happened to me too. The guy was beating up on his partner so I stepped in and SHE told me to fuck off. Is response to everyone saying similar to this- She HAS to stick up for her man out of fear he will beat the shit out of her even worse later on. Abuse victims walk on eggshells all the time. Any little thing can make their abuser mad. You may well get slated by the woman but somewhere inside her she will appreciate the fact that someone helped. It will give her a glimmer of hope that she IS worthy of being liked - even though he tells her she's worthless. Please don't be mad at her. x" think he was the abused | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"That happened to me too. The guy was beating up on his partner so I stepped in and SHE told me to fuck off. Is response to everyone saying similar to this- She HAS to stick up for her man out of fear he will beat the shit out of her even worse later on. Abuse victims walk on eggshells all the time. Any little thing can make their abuser mad. You may well get slated by the woman but somewhere inside her she will appreciate the fact that someone helped. It will give her a glimmer of hope that she IS worthy of being liked - even though he tells her she's worthless. Please don't be mad at her. x" That's pretty much what I realised later. Why do women stay with men like that. Saying that, my ex/w punched me in the face three years before we eventually divorced. She did it to get me to hit her back so she could call the police and have me thrown out (I didn't hit her back, just held her arms to stop her doing it again) but I stayed for three more years of hell. Why? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Coudnt respond to tony x pity that " Why not respond on forum? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"That happened to me too. The guy was beating up on his partner so I stepped in and SHE told me to fuck off. Is response to everyone saying similar to this- She HAS to stick up for her man out of fear he will beat the shit out of her even worse later on. Abuse victims walk on eggshells all the time. Any little thing can make their abuser mad. You may well get slated by the woman but somewhere inside her she will appreciate the fact that someone helped. It will give her a glimmer of hope that she IS worthy of being liked - even though he tells her she's worthless. Please don't be mad at her. x" Agreed!!! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"That happened to me too. The guy was beating up on his partner so I stepped in and SHE told me to fuck off. Is response to everyone saying similar to this- She HAS to stick up for her man out of fear he will beat the shit out of her even worse later on. Abuse victims walk on eggshells all the time. Any little thing can make their abuser mad. You may well get slated by the woman but somewhere inside her she will appreciate the fact that someone helped. It will give her a glimmer of hope that she IS worthy of being liked - even though he tells her she's worthless. Please don't be mad at her. x That's pretty much what I realised later. Why do women stay with men like that. Saying that, my ex/w punched me in the face three years before we eventually divorced. She did it to get me to hit her back so she could call the police and have me thrown out (I didn't hit her back, just held her arms to stop her doing it again) but I stayed for three more years of hell. Why? " I don't know about anyone else but I stayed out of fear... And I always thought it might get better but it never did in the end I engineered it so he was the one who went and once he had gone the evil spell was broken | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"If something's happening, or if you think something's going to happen it's always better to speak out and say something rather than nothing, imo. Often the mere presence of an outsider can defuse or at least make the aggressor think twice before continuing their rage. " | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"That happened to me too. The guy was beating up on his partner so I stepped in and SHE told me to fuck off. Is response to everyone saying similar to this- She HAS to stick up for her man out of fear he will beat the shit out of her even worse later on. Abuse victims walk on eggshells all the time. Any little thing can make their abuser mad. You may well get slated by the woman but somewhere inside her she will appreciate the fact that someone helped. It will give her a glimmer of hope that she IS worthy of being liked - even though he tells her she's worthless. Please don't be mad at her. x That's pretty much what I realised later. Why do women stay with men like that. Saying that, my ex/w punched me in the face three years before we eventually divorced. She did it to get me to hit her back so she could call the police and have me thrown out (I didn't hit her back, just held her arms to stop her doing it again) but I stayed for three more years of hell. Why? I don't know about anyone else but I stayed out of fear... And I always thought it might get better but it never did in the end I engineered it so he was the one who went and once he had gone the evil spell was broken " i know (now) exactly why i got into the relationship and why i stayed. Because i went and found out why i managed to break the cycle and never was in an abusive relationship again. Bloody hard work sorting myself out | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"I once started a domestic at a meet with a couple. It was all going swimmingly until I told the husband that if he wanted he could fuck me. He asked his wife who then said yes, if you want to, in a way that made it obvious that it was really a no. The atmosphere didn't half go down the pan after that " I'd say you weren't the cause of that, I think the problem was they hadn't discussed fully what their limits were before the meet. In that instance if she felt uncomfortable with that she should have said so. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"If you ever come across a couple fighting man hits the woman if you break it up/touch the guy you're about 10 seconds away from getting blindsided by the woman and now you're 5he bad guy" More often than not that is the ridiculous case. Some women when in abusive relationships are literally fucking brain dead - hence them remaining in in abusive relationships and defending their men EVEN AFTER BEING ASSAULTED BY THEM. The typical seekers of the moral high ground on here can try to roast me for saying such a thing but I couldn't give sh*te because it's the truth. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"That happened to me too. The guy was beating up on his partner so I stepped in and SHE told me to fuck off. Is response to everyone saying similar to this- She HAS to stick up for her man out of fear he will beat the shit out of her even worse later on. Abuse victims walk on eggshells all the time. Any little thing can make their abuser mad. You may well get slated by the woman but somewhere inside her she will appreciate the fact that someone helped. It will give her a glimmer of hope that she IS worthy of being liked - even though he tells her she's worthless. Please don't be mad at her. x" There's no excuse for not going to the police with the evidence and getting a restraining order against the boyfriend. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"If you ever come across a couple fighting man hits the woman if you break it up/touch the guy you're about 10 seconds away from getting blindsided by the woman and now you're 5he bad guy More often than not that is the ridiculous case. Some women when in abusive relationships are literally fucking brain dead - hence them remaining in in abusive relationships and defending their men EVEN AFTER BEING ASSAULTED BY THEM. The typical seekers of the moral high ground on here can try to roast me for saying such a thing but I couldn't give sh*te because it's the truth." On the blob again? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"That happened to me too. The guy was beating up on his partner so I stepped in and SHE told me to fuck off. Is response to everyone saying similar to this- She HAS to stick up for her man out of fear he will beat the shit out of her even worse later on. Abuse victims walk on eggshells all the time. Any little thing can make their abuser mad. You may well get slated by the woman but somewhere inside her she will appreciate the fact that someone helped. It will give her a glimmer of hope that she IS worthy of being liked - even though he tells her she's worthless. Please don't be mad at her. x There's no excuse for not going to the police with the evidence and getting a restraining order against the boyfriend." They can get a non-molestation order from their local County Court. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"That happened to me too. The guy was beating up on his partner so I stepped in and SHE told me to fuck off. Is response to everyone saying similar to this- She HAS to stick up for her man out of fear he will beat the shit out of her even worse later on. Abuse victims walk on eggshells all the time. Any little thing can make their abuser mad. You may well get slated by the woman but somewhere inside her she will appreciate the fact that someone helped. It will give her a glimmer of hope that she IS worthy of being liked - even though he tells her she's worthless. Please don't be mad at her. x There's no excuse for not going to the police with the evidence and getting a restraining order against the boyfriend." no excuse but plenty of reasons. Unless you are in that particular relationship at the time you have no idea | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"If you ever come across a couple fighting man hits the woman if you break it up/touch the guy you're about 10 seconds away from getting blindsided by the woman and now you're 5he bad guy More often than not that is the ridiculous case. Some women when in abusive relationships are literally fucking brain dead - hence them remaining in in abusive relationships and defending their men EVEN AFTER BEING ASSAULTED BY THEM. The typical seekers of the moral high ground on here can try to roast me for saying such a thing but I couldn't give sh*te because it's the truth." I wouldn't give you the satisfaction of trying to roast you as you obviously have no idea what you are talking about... | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"That happened to me too. The guy was beating up on his partner so I stepped in and SHE told me to fuck off. Is response to everyone saying similar to this- She HAS to stick up for her man out of fear he will beat the shit out of her even worse later on. Abuse victims walk on eggshells all the time. Any little thing can make their abuser mad. You may well get slated by the woman but somewhere inside her she will appreciate the fact that someone helped. It will give her a glimmer of hope that she IS worthy of being liked - even though he tells her she's worthless. Please don't be mad at her. x There's no excuse for not going to the police with the evidence and getting a restraining order against the boyfriend.no excuse but plenty of reasons. Unless you are in that particular relationship at the time you have no idea" "no idea"? No need for melodrama - of course I do - anyone would as it's a part of human nature and guess what? I'm human - and a non-melodramatic one at that. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"If you ever come across a couple fighting man hits the woman if you break it up/touch the guy you're about 10 seconds away from getting blindsided by the woman and now you're 5he bad guy More often than not that is the ridiculous case. Some women when in abusive relationships are literally fucking brain dead - hence them remaining in in abusive relationships and defending their men EVEN AFTER BEING ASSAULTED BY THEM. The typical seekers of the moral high ground on here can try to roast me for saying such a thing but I couldn't give sh*te because it's the truth. I wouldn't give you the satisfaction of trying to roast you as you obviously have no idea what you are talking about... " Likewise reference the melodrama - there's no need for it ok | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"If you ever come across a couple fighting man hits the woman if you break it up/touch the guy you're about 10 seconds away from getting blindsided by the woman and now you're 5he bad guy More often than not that is the ridiculous case. Some women when in abusive relationships are literally fucking brain dead - hence them remaining in in abusive relationships and defending their men EVEN AFTER BEING ASSAULTED BY THEM. The typical seekers of the moral high ground on here can try to roast me for saying such a thing but I couldn't give sh*te because it's the truth. I wouldn't give you the satisfaction of trying to roast you as you obviously have no idea what you are talking about... Likewise reference the melodrama - there's no need for it ok" I don't do melodrama... I do fact, and unless you have been in such a relationship there is absolutely no point in commenting on it | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"That happened to me too. The guy was beating up on his partner so I stepped in and SHE told me to fuck off. Is response to everyone saying similar to this- She HAS to stick up for her man out of fear he will beat the shit out of her even worse later on. Abuse victims walk on eggshells all the time. Any little thing can make their abuser mad. You may well get slated by the woman but somewhere inside her she will appreciate the fact that someone helped. It will give her a glimmer of hope that she IS worthy of being liked - even though he tells her she's worthless. Please don't be mad at her. x There's no excuse for not going to the police with the evidence and getting a restraining order against the boyfriend.no excuse but plenty of reasons. Unless you are in that particular relationship at the time you have no idea "no idea"? No need for melodrama - of course I do - anyone would as it's a part of human nature and guess what? I'm human - and a non-melodramatic one at that." on this occassion i wont.even rise to.you. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"If you ever come across a couple fighting man hits the woman if you break it up/touch the guy you're about 10 seconds away from getting blindsided by the woman and now you're 5he bad guy More often than not that is the ridiculous case. Some women when in abusive relationships are literally fucking brain dead - hence them remaining in in abusive relationships and defending their men EVEN AFTER BEING ASSAULTED BY THEM. The typical seekers of the moral high ground on here can try to roast me for saying such a thing but I couldn't give sh*te because it's the truth. I wouldn't give you the satisfaction of trying to roast you as you obviously have no idea what you are talking about... Likewise reference the melodrama - there's no need for it ok I don't do melodrama... I do fact, and unless you have been in such a relationship there is absolutely no point in commenting on it" This is a public forum - so you don't have any right to dictate who does and does not take part in it because by attempting to boss people around the only thing you're going to do is disrupt it | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"It seems that a few of the posts on here have a distorted view of why women or men stay in obusive relationships... Just think of this, over 70% of women who find themselves in refuges would of been either physically, mentally or sexually abused as a child... So how does that woman have the mental capacity to say no if it's always been there? It's human nature to go with what you know if all you've known is disfunction you will subconscily go looking for it, until the time comes that you realise your worth more." It's about the abuser stripping every shred of confidence, self esteem and independence systematically from you. So you don't have the emotional strength to leave. To be on your own can be terrifying when you're in that state. And they promise they will never do it again, and shower you with affection and you think they've really changed. And the cycle of abuse continues. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"It seems that a few of the posts on here have a distorted view of why women or men stay in obusive relationships... Just think of this, over 70% of women who find themselves in refuges would of been either physically, mentally or sexually abused as a child... So how does that woman have the mental capacity to say no if it's always been there? It's human nature to go with what you know if all you've known is disfunction you will subconscily go looking for it, until the time comes that you realise your worth more." that is the exact reason for me or quite simply it was my comfortzone. I didnt even know domestic abuse wasnt normal. I then went and learnt about it and through hard work i broke the cycle | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
" I expect people to be more civil/mature than that" If you 'expect' civility and maturity shown toward you, maybe try being civil toward others. Blaming the victim of domestic abuse isn't an opinion. It's downright offensive. Blaming the victim of a crime is 'idiotic'. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
" I expect people to be more civil/mature than that If you 'expect' civility and maturity shown toward you, maybe try being civil toward others. Blaming the victim of domestic abuse isn't an opinion. It's downright offensive. Blaming the victim of a crime is 'idiotic'. " I said that there's no excuse for not going to the police with the evidence to get a restraining order - I never said not doing so is "idiotic". The law is on the side of the victims - if someone physically or mentally/emotionally abused they should go to the police. That's why they are there - they're there to help people. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"I find your insistence that you are always right in some threads amusing. I always assume you are being provocative not because you're an idiot but because you enjoy winding people up. However, blaming an abused person for their predicament isn't in any way amusing. Would you say a rape victim deserves it because of the length her skirt? Or a child thats told to keep quiet? Im sorry, but your statements are disgraceful." "disgraceful"? It's disgraceful for a woman to assault someone trying to help them after they have been assaulted by their partner. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
" I expect people to be more civil/mature than that If you 'expect' civility and maturity shown toward you, maybe try being civil toward others. Blaming the victim of domestic abuse isn't an opinion. It's downright offensive. Blaming the victim of a crime is 'idiotic'. I said that there's no excuse for not going to the police with the evidence to get a restraining order - I never said not doing so is "idiotic". The law is on the side of the victims - if someone physically or mentally/emotionally abused they should go to the police. That's why they are there - they're there to help people." It's ignorant to think ROs are just handed out, and that the victim won't experience repercussions of reporting the crime, and that just contacting the police guarantees protection from an abuser. Also, your expectation of an abuser adhering to an RO seems naive. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"I find your insistence that you are always right in some threads amusing. I always assume you are being provocative not because you're an idiot but because you enjoy winding people up. However, blaming an abused person for their predicament isn't in any way amusing. Would you say a rape victim deserves it because of the length her skirt? Or a child thats told to keep quiet? Im sorry, but your statements are disgraceful. "disgraceful"? It's disgraceful for a woman to assault someone trying to help them after they have been assaulted by their partner." your paragraph refering to some women being brain dead was not only disgraceful but sad and incompehensable that someone would have that attitude. You have no awareness of what you said. What impact that way of thinking could have on someone. I wasnt going to reply to you again, your reputation for stirring things up comes before you. Sometimes its funny but someone who seems more concerned about whether someone called them stupid or not and not looking at what they said tells me all i need to know. It was low. Very low | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
" I expect people to be more civil/mature than that If you 'expect' civility and maturity shown toward you, maybe try being civil toward others. Blaming the victim of domestic abuse isn't an opinion. It's downright offensive. Blaming the victim of a crime is 'idiotic'. I said that there's no excuse for not going to the police with the evidence to get a restraining order - I never said not doing so is "idiotic". The law is on the side of the victims - if someone physically or mentally/emotionally abused they should go to the police. That's why they are there - they're there to help people. It's ignorant to think ROs are just handed out, and that the victim won't experience repercussions of reporting the crime, and that just contacting the police guarantees protection from an abuser. Also, your expectation of an abuser adhering to an RO seems naive. " Needless to say - if they don't initially abide by a restraining order against then then the police it naturally works against them for being stupid enough not to learn from their mistakes because the police are then able to build a stronger case against them. So the first step is always to go to the police as soon as you have evidence that you have been mistreated. So as I said already - there's no excuse for not going to the police when you have the evidence because once you do so you begin the process of ending the cycle of abuse. So as I said - the police are there to help and they will if you are a victim. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
" I expect people to be more civil/mature than that If you 'expect' civility and maturity shown toward you, maybe try being civil toward others. Blaming the victim of domestic abuse isn't an opinion. It's downright offensive. Blaming the victim of a crime is 'idiotic'. I said that there's no excuse for not going to the police with the evidence to get a restraining order - I never said not doing so is "idiotic". e." No, you just called them brain dead. I have no experiences of abuse, thankfully, but from what I have read and listened to, it really isn't as simple as you make out | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"I find your insistence that you are always right in some threads amusing. I always assume you are being provocative not because you're an idiot but because you enjoy winding people up. However, blaming an abused person for their predicament isn't in any way amusing. Would you say a rape victim deserves it because of the length her skirt? Or a child thats told to keep quiet? Im sorry, but your statements are disgraceful. "disgraceful"? It's disgraceful for a woman to assault someone trying to help them after they have been assaulted by their partner.your paragraph refering to some women being brain dead was not only disgraceful but sad and incompehensable that someone would have that attitude. You have no awareness of what you said. What impact that way of thinking could have on someone. I wasnt going to reply to you again, your reputation for stirring things up comes before you. Sometimes its funny but someone who seems more concerned about whether someone called them stupid or not and not looking at what they said tells me all i need to know. It was low. Very low " I'm stirring nothing - I know exactly what I said - I said if someone stays with someone else that abuses them then shame on them. The right thing to do is not stay with them - the right thing to do is go straight to the police and report them. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"I find your insistence that you are always right in some threads amusing. I always assume you are being provocative not because you're an idiot but because you enjoy winding people up. However, blaming an abused person for their predicament isn't in any way amusing. Would you say a rape victim deserves it because of the length her skirt? Or a child thats told to keep quiet? Im sorry, but your statements are disgraceful. "disgraceful"? It's disgraceful for a woman to assault someone trying to help them after they have been assaulted by their partner.your paragraph refering to some women being brain dead was not only disgraceful but sad and incompehensable that someone would have that attitude. You have no awareness of what you said. What impact that way of thinking could have on someone. I wasnt going to reply to you again, your reputation for stirring things up comes before you. Sometimes its funny but someone who seems more concerned about whether someone called them stupid or not and not looking at what they said tells me all i need to know. It was low. Very low I'm stirring nothing - I know exactly what I said - I said if someone stays with someone else that abuses them then shame on them. The right thing to do is not stay with them - the right thing to do is go straight to the police and report them." But it's not always that easy is it, fear of a person can have a big hold over someone and we have all heard of the mind games some guys and women can use to control they partner | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"I find your insistence that you are always right in some threads amusing. I always assume you are being provocative not because you're an idiot but because you enjoy winding people up. However, blaming an abused person for their predicament isn't in any way amusing. Would you say a rape victim deserves it because of the length her skirt? Or a child thats told to keep quiet? Im sorry, but your statements are disgraceful. "disgraceful"? It's disgraceful for a woman to assault someone trying to help them after they have been assaulted by their partner.your paragraph refering to some women being brain dead was not only disgraceful but sad and incompehensable that someone would have that attitude. You have no awareness of what you said. What impact that way of thinking could have on someone. I wasnt going to reply to you again, your reputation for stirring things up comes before you. Sometimes its funny but someone who seems more concerned about whether someone called them stupid or not and not looking at what they said tells me all i need to know. It was low. Very low I'm stirring nothing - I know exactly what I said - I said if someone stays with someone else that abuses them then shame on them. The right thing to do is not stay with them - the right thing to do is go straight to the police and report them." no you bloody well didnt, you know that and i know.that and everyone thats read the thread knows you didnt. Or if thats what you " think" you said reread the paragraph where you mention brain dead Absolutly no idea what you said have you | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
" I expect people to be more civil/mature than that If you 'expect' civility and maturity shown toward you, maybe try being civil toward others. Blaming the victim of domestic abuse isn't an opinion. It's downright offensive. Blaming the victim of a crime is 'idiotic'. I said that there's no excuse for not going to the police with the evidence to get a restraining order - I never said not doing so is "idiotic". The law is on the side of the victims - if someone physically or mentally/emotionally abused they should go to the police. That's why they are there - they're there to help people. It's ignorant to think ROs are just handed out, and that the victim won't experience repercussions of reporting the crime, and that just contacting the police guarantees protection from an abuser. Also, your expectation of an abuser adhering to an RO seems naive. Needless to say - if they don't initially abide by a restraining order against then then the police it naturally works against them for being stupid enough not to learn from their mistakes because the police are then able to build a stronger case against them. So the first step is always to go to the police as soon as you have evidence that you have been mistreated. So as I said already - there's no excuse for not going to the police when you have the evidence because once you do so you begin the process of ending the cycle of abuse. So as I said - the police are there to help and they will if you are a victim." As someone who works with victims of domestic abuse I find your comments discusting and ill informed. Those 'stupid' women you are condemning all have their own stories and reasons for staying within the toxic environment. Complex, and with multiple issues, those ladies go through hell before coming to the brave decision to leave (often returning again and again). Stupid is not a word to describe those women. Brave, courageous and survivors are words that you may want to look up, as I doubt anyone without an ounce of compassion for any victim of domestic abuse would understand this issue on any level. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"I find your insistence that you are always right in some threads amusing. I always assume you are being provocative not because you're an idiot but because you enjoy winding people up. However, blaming an abused person for their predicament isn't in any way amusing. Would you say a rape victim deserves it because of the length her skirt? Or a child thats told to keep quiet? Im sorry, but your statements are disgraceful. "disgraceful"? It's disgraceful for a woman to assault someone trying to help them after they have been assaulted by their partner.your paragraph refering to some women being brain dead was not only disgraceful but sad and incompehensable that someone would have that attitude. You have no awareness of what you said. What impact that way of thinking could have on someone. I wasnt going to reply to you again, your reputation for stirring things up comes before you. Sometimes its funny but someone who seems more concerned about whether someone called them stupid or not and not looking at what they said tells me all i need to know. It was low. Very low I'm stirring nothing - I know exactly what I said - I said if someone stays with someone else that abuses them then shame on them. The right thing to do is not stay with them - the right thing to do is go straight to the police and report them." your exact wording was 'Some women when in abusive relationships are literally fucking brain dead - hence them remaining in in abusive relationships and defending their men EVEN AFTER BEING ASSAULTED BY THEM....' now it has already been pointed out to you that to say this is highly offensive but as you stand by it, it says a lot more about you than it ever would about victims of domestic abuse... as I stated in an earlier post, I got out on my terms but it took me a long time to realise that I needed to get out...we are not brain dead, mostly we are brainwashed and that is a completely different set of circumstances | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"If you ever come across a couple fighting man hits the woman if you break it up/touch the guy you're about 10 seconds away from getting blindsided by the woman and now you're 5he bad guy" That's true I went to friends of mine once and I could hear him hitting her from outside the door,i knocked on the door, no reply but it went quiet, couldn't get a reply so I called the police, when they came she didn't want to press charges so they left and I was told by the women to mind my own business The thing is even though we know its got bugger all to do with us I personally find it very hard to walk away from somebody being physically abused and say/do nothing | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"That happened to me too. The guy was beating up on his partner so I stepped in and SHE told me to fuck off." I sometimes wonder if the women tell you to leave it alone because she's scared of the back lash from him for you stepping in rather than being ungrateful | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"I find your insistence that you are always right in some threads amusing. I always assume you are being provocative not because you're an idiot but because you enjoy winding people up. However, blaming an abused person for their predicament isn't in any way amusing. Would you say a rape victim deserves it because of the length her skirt? Or a child thats told to keep quiet? Im sorry, but your statements are disgraceful. "disgraceful"? It's disgraceful for a woman to assault someone trying to help them after they have been assaulted by their partner.your paragraph refering to some women being brain dead was not only disgraceful but sad and incompehensable that someone would have that attitude. You have no awareness of what you said. What impact that way of thinking could have on someone. I wasnt going to reply to you again, your reputation for stirring things up comes before you. Sometimes its funny but someone who seems more concerned about whether someone called them stupid or not and not looking at what they said tells me all i need to know. It was low. Very low I'm stirring nothing - I know exactly what I said - I said if someone stays with someone else that abuses them then shame on them. The right thing to do is not stay with them - the right thing to do is go straight to the police and report them." As someone once sang "What a wonderful world that would be". Simple, black & white, right and wrong. No room for manipulation, lies and deceit. Instant, protective justice for the abused. No bail, no cautions - straight to prison. Change of identity and relocation for the abused. Brilliant. And all you have to do is tell the Police. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"That happened to me too. The guy was beating up on his partner so I stepped in and SHE told me to fuck off. Is response to everyone saying similar to this- She HAS to stick up for her man out of fear he will beat the shit out of her even worse later on. Abuse victims walk on eggshells all the time. Any little thing can make their abuser mad. You may well get slated by the woman but somewhere inside her she will appreciate the fact that someone helped. It will give her a glimmer of hope that she IS worthy of being liked - even though he tells her she's worthless. Please don't be mad at her. x" | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
" I expect people to be more civil/mature than that If you 'expect' civility and maturity shown toward you, maybe try being civil toward others. Blaming the victim of domestic abuse isn't an opinion. It's downright offensive. Blaming the victim of a crime is 'idiotic'. I said that there's no excuse for not going to the police with the evidence to get a restraining order - I never said not doing so is "idiotic". The law is on the side of the victims - if someone physically or mentally/emotionally abused they should go to the police. That's why they are there - they're there to help people. It's ignorant to think ROs are just handed out, and that the victim won't experience repercussions of reporting the crime, and that just contacting the police guarantees protection from an abuser. Also, your expectation of an abuser adhering to an RO seems naive. Needless to say - if they don't initially abide by a restraining order against then then the police it naturally works against them for being stupid enough not to learn from their mistakes because the police are then able to build a stronger case against them. So the first step is always to go to the police as soon as you have evidence that you have been mistreated. So as I said already - there's no excuse for not going to the police when you have the evidence because once you do so you begin the process of ending the cycle of abuse. So as I said - the police are there to help and they will if you are a victim." Your position on abuse is completely naive and immature. No one chooses to be abused, some people don't feel like reporting it as a crime is an option or that they feel like they deserve the abuse due to conditioning. Evidence isn't always available. How do you suggest an abused person who is completely cut off from the outside world records their abuse? I think your short sightedness here is from lack of information, perhaps you ought to look into it and read some case studies, instead of relying on the story of a d*unk girl saying "fuck off". There's more to domestic abuse than just alcohol fuelled arguments, but once you get a well rounded view your ill informed position will most likely change. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
" I expect people to be more civil/mature than that If you 'expect' civility and maturity shown toward you, maybe try being civil toward others. Blaming the victim of domestic abuse isn't an opinion. It's downright offensive. Blaming the victim of a crime is 'idiotic'. I said that there's no excuse for not going to the police with the evidence to get a restraining order - I never said not doing so is "idiotic". The law is on the side of the victims - if someone physically or mentally/emotionally abused they should go to the police. That's why they are there - they're there to help people. It's ignorant to think ROs are just handed out, and that the victim won't experience repercussions of reporting the crime, and that just contacting the police guarantees protection from an abuser. Also, your expectation of an abuser adhering to an RO seems naive. Needless to say - if they don't initially abide by a restraining order against then then the police it naturally works against them for being stupid enough not to learn from their mistakes because the police are then able to build a stronger case against them. So the first step is always to go to the police as soon as you have evidence that you have been mistreated. So as I said already - there's no excuse for not going to the police when you have the evidence because once you do so you begin the process of ending the cycle of abuse. So as I said - the police are there to help and they will if you are a victim. Your position on abuse is completely naive and immature. No one chooses to be abused, some people don't feel like reporting it as a crime is an option or that they feel like they deserve the abuse due to conditioning. Evidence isn't always available. How do you suggest an abused person who is completely cut off from the outside world records their abuse? I think your short sightedness here is from lack of information, perhaps you ought to look into it and read some case studies, instead of relying on the story of a d*unk girl saying "fuck off". There's more to domestic abuse than just alcohol fuelled arguments, but once you get a well rounded view your ill informed position will most likely change. " to be honest i doubt anyone who views abuse victims.as brain dead will change their view | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
" I expect people to be more civil/mature than that If you 'expect' civility and maturity shown toward you, maybe try being civil toward others. Blaming the victim of domestic abuse isn't an opinion. It's downright offensive. Blaming the victim of a crime is 'idiotic'. I said that there's no excuse for not going to the police with the evidence to get a restraining order - I never said not doing so is "idiotic". The law is on the side of the victims - if someone physically or mentally/emotionally abused they should go to the police. That's why they are there - they're there to help people. It's ignorant to think ROs are just handed out, and that the victim won't experience repercussions of reporting the crime, and that just contacting the police guarantees protection from an abuser. Also, your expectation of an abuser adhering to an RO seems naive. Needless to say - if they don't initially abide by a restraining order against then then the police it naturally works against them for being stupid enough not to learn from their mistakes because the police are then able to build a stronger case against them. So the first step is always to go to the police as soon as you have evidence that you have been mistreated. So as I said already - there's no excuse for not going to the police when you have the evidence because once you do so you begin the process of ending the cycle of abuse. So as I said - the police are there to help and they will if you are a victim. Your position on abuse is completely naive and immature. No one chooses to be abused, some people don't feel like reporting it as a crime is an option or that they feel like they deserve the abuse due to conditioning. Evidence isn't always available. How do you suggest an abused person who is completely cut off from the outside world records their abuse? I think your short sightedness here is from lack of information, perhaps you ought to look into it and read some case studies, instead of relying on the story of a d*unk girl saying "fuck off". There's more to domestic abuse than just alcohol fuelled arguments, but once you get a well rounded view your ill informed position will most likely change. " Many victims of abuse don't report their abuse because they are scared of the backlash for doing so So they go to the police, the police pull the abuser in, question him, let him go and the abuser goes and kicks the shit out of the victim for reporting him Anybody who believes that going to the police will stop abuse does not live in the real world Even having a restraining order does not stop some people, they can be ignored | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
" I expect people to be more civil/mature than that If you 'expect' civility and maturity shown toward you, maybe try being civil toward others. Blaming the victim of domestic abuse isn't an opinion. It's downright offensive. Blaming the victim of a crime is 'idiotic'. I said that there's no excuse for not going to the police with the evidence to get a restraining order - I never said not doing so is "idiotic". The law is on the side of the victims - if someone physically or mentally/emotionally abused they should go to the police. That's why they are there - they're there to help people. It's ignorant to think ROs are just handed out, and that the victim won't experience repercussions of reporting the crime, and that just contacting the police guarantees protection from an abuser. Also, your expectation of an abuser adhering to an RO seems naive. Needless to say - if they don't initially abide by a restraining order against then then the police it naturally works against them for being stupid enough not to learn from their mistakes because the police are then able to build a stronger case against them. So the first step is always to go to the police as soon as you have evidence that you have been mistreated. So as I said already - there's no excuse for not going to the police when you have the evidence because once you do so you begin the process of ending the cycle of abuse. So as I said - the police are there to help and they will if you are a victim. Your position on abuse is completely naive and immature. No one chooses to be abused, some people don't feel like reporting it as a crime is an option or that they feel like they deserve the abuse due to conditioning. Evidence isn't always available. How do you suggest an abused person who is completely cut off from the outside world records their abuse? I think your short sightedness here is from lack of information, perhaps you ought to look into it and read some case studies, instead of relying on the story of a d*unk girl saying "fuck off". There's more to domestic abuse than just alcohol fuelled arguments, but once you get a well rounded view your ill informed position will most likely change. " It takes one phonecall to phone the police! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
" I expect people to be more civil/mature than that If you 'expect' civility and maturity shown toward you, maybe try being civil toward others. Blaming the victim of domestic abuse isn't an opinion. It's downright offensive. Blaming the victim of a crime is 'idiotic'. I said that there's no excuse for not going to the police with the evidence to get a restraining order - I never said not doing so is "idiotic". The law is on the side of the victims - if someone physically or mentally/emotionally abused they should go to the police. That's why they are there - they're there to help people. It's ignorant to think ROs are just handed out, and that the victim won't experience repercussions of reporting the crime, and that just contacting the police guarantees protection from an abuser. Also, your expectation of an abuser adhering to an RO seems naive. Needless to say - if they don't initially abide by a restraining order against then then the police it naturally works against them for being stupid enough not to learn from their mistakes because the police are then able to build a stronger case against them. So the first step is always to go to the police as soon as you have evidence that you have been mistreated. So as I said already - there's no excuse for not going to the police when you have the evidence because once you do so you begin the process of ending the cycle of abuse. So as I said - the police are there to help and they will if you are a victim. Your position on abuse is completely naive and immature. No one chooses to be abused, some people don't feel like reporting it as a crime is an option or that they feel like they deserve the abuse due to conditioning. Evidence isn't always available. How do you suggest an abused person who is completely cut off from the outside world records their abuse? I think your short sightedness here is from lack of information, perhaps you ought to look into it and read some case studies, instead of relying on the story of a d*unk girl saying "fuck off". There's more to domestic abuse than just alcohol fuelled arguments, but once you get a well rounded view your ill informed position will most likely change. to be honest i doubt anyone who views abuse victims.as brain dead will change their view" As I said already, the intelligent thing to do is to phone the police because it's their job to help in such situations. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"to be honest i doubt anyone who views abuse victims.as brain dead will change their view" Maybe. It's a shame that someone would choose to remain misinformed though. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
" I expect people to be more civil/mature than that If you 'expect' civility and maturity shown toward you, maybe try being civil toward others. Blaming the victim of domestic abuse isn't an opinion. It's downright offensive. Blaming the victim of a crime is 'idiotic'. I said that there's no excuse for not going to the police with the evidence to get a restraining order - I never said not doing so is "idiotic". The law is on the side of the victims - if someone physically or mentally/emotionally abused they should go to the police. That's why they are there - they're there to help people. It's ignorant to think ROs are just handed out, and that the victim won't experience repercussions of reporting the crime, and that just contacting the police guarantees protection from an abuser. Also, your expectation of an abuser adhering to an RO seems naive. Needless to say - if they don't initially abide by a restraining order against then then the police it naturally works against them for being stupid enough not to learn from their mistakes because the police are then able to build a stronger case against them. So the first step is always to go to the police as soon as you have evidence that you have been mistreated. So as I said already - there's no excuse for not going to the police when you have the evidence because once you do so you begin the process of ending the cycle of abuse. So as I said - the police are there to help and they will if you are a victim. Your position on abuse is completely naive and immature. No one chooses to be abused, some people don't feel like reporting it as a crime is an option or that they feel like they deserve the abuse due to conditioning. Evidence isn't always available. How do you suggest an abused person who is completely cut off from the outside world records their abuse? I think your short sightedness here is from lack of information, perhaps you ought to look into it and read some case studies, instead of relying on the story of a d*unk girl saying "fuck off". There's more to domestic abuse than just alcohol fuelled arguments, but once you get a well rounded view your ill informed position will most likely change. It takes one phonecall to phone the police!" No it doesn't. It takes much more as an investigation has to take place, statements have to be taken. The police aren't there to mediate and solve the situation. You're also assuming an abused person has access to a phone to make a call. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"So in answer to everone - it may not be as simple as going to the police but that doesn't mean it can't be as simple as going straight to them if someone assaults you even once. In principal - if someone hits you - even once - just report them. And yes - I said "some women are in abusive relationships are literally fucking braindead" because the intelligent thing to do is to get out of it as soon as it starts. It's not rocket science. " no, if you was as intelligent as you make out you will know abuse doesnt start with physical violence its usually way before. For someone who doesnt have a clue i would recommend watching "killed by my boyfriend" but hey you want to call women braindead, make them believe its their own fault and make them feel even more worthless then go ahead. Oh sorry you already have | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
" I expect people to be more civil/mature than that If you 'expect' civility and maturity shown toward you, maybe try being civil toward others. Blaming the victim of domestic abuse isn't an opinion. It's downright offensive. Blaming the victim of a crime is 'idiotic'. I said that there's no excuse for not going to the police with the evidence to get a restraining order - I never said not doing so is "idiotic". The law is on the side of the victims - if someone physically or mentally/emotionally abused they should go to the police. That's why they are there - they're there to help people. It's ignorant to think ROs are just handed out, and that the victim won't experience repercussions of reporting the crime, and that just contacting the police guarantees protection from an abuser. Also, your expectation of an abuser adhering to an RO seems naive. Needless to say - if they don't initially abide by a restraining order against then then the police it naturally works against them for being stupid enough not to learn from their mistakes because the police are then able to build a stronger case against them. So the first step is always to go to the police as soon as you have evidence that you have been mistreated. So as I said already - there's no excuse for not going to the police when you have the evidence because once you do so you begin the process of ending the cycle of abuse. So as I said - the police are there to help and they will if you are a victim. Your position on abuse is completely naive and immature. No one chooses to be abused, some people don't feel like reporting it as a crime is an option or that they feel like they deserve the abuse due to conditioning. Evidence isn't always available. How do you suggest an abused person who is completely cut off from the outside world records their abuse? I think your short sightedness here is from lack of information, perhaps you ought to look into it and read some case studies, instead of relying on the story of a d*unk girl saying "fuck off". There's more to domestic abuse than just alcohol fuelled arguments, but once you get a well rounded view your ill informed position will most likely change. It takes one phonecall to phone the police! No it doesn't. It takes much more as an investigation has to take place, statements have to be taken. The police aren't there to mediate and solve the situation. You're also assuming an abused person has access to a phone to make a call." From your line of reasoning it seems you're assuming it's impossible for an abused person to ever come in contact with a phone to make a call - it's as near to impossible as it's possible to be for anyone in 2016 to be without access to least one phone anywhere in their life so as far as I'm concered you're just nitpicking for the sake of it. Ring the police to report the crime and you begin the end of the cycle of abuse - it takes just one phone call. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
" I expect people to be more civil/mature than that If you 'expect' civility and maturity shown toward you, maybe try being civil toward others. Blaming the victim of domestic abuse isn't an opinion. It's downright offensive. Blaming the victim of a crime is 'idiotic'. I said that there's no excuse for not going to the police with the evidence to get a restraining order - I never said not doing so is "idiotic". The law is on the side of the victims - if someone physically or mentally/emotionally abused they should go to the police. That's why they are there - they're there to help people. It's ignorant to think ROs are just handed out, and that the victim won't experience repercussions of reporting the crime, and that just contacting the police guarantees protection from an abuser. Also, your expectation of an abuser adhering to an RO seems naive. Needless to say - if they don't initially abide by a restraining order against then then the police it naturally works against them for being stupid enough not to learn from their mistakes because the police are then able to build a stronger case against them. So the first step is always to go to the police as soon as you have evidence that you have been mistreated. So as I said already - there's no excuse for not going to the police when you have the evidence because once you do so you begin the process of ending the cycle of abuse. So as I said - the police are there to help and they will if you are a victim. Your position on abuse is completely naive and immature. No one chooses to be abused, some people don't feel like reporting it as a crime is an option or that they feel like they deserve the abuse due to conditioning. Evidence isn't always available. How do you suggest an abused person who is completely cut off from the outside world records their abuse? I think your short sightedness here is from lack of information, perhaps you ought to look into it and read some case studies, instead of relying on the story of a d*unk girl saying "fuck off". There's more to domestic abuse than just alcohol fuelled arguments, but once you get a well rounded view your ill informed position will most likely change. It takes one phonecall to phone the police! No it doesn't. It takes much more as an investigation has to take place, statements have to be taken. The police aren't there to mediate and solve the situation. You're also assuming an abused person has access to a phone to make a call. From your line of reasoning it seems you're assuming it's impossible for an abused person to ever come in contact with a phone to make a call - it's as near to impossible as it's possible to be for anyone in 2016 to be without access to least one phone anywhere in their life so as far as I'm concered you're just nitpicking for the sake of it. Ring the police to report the crime and you begin the end of the cycle of abuse - it takes just one phone call." You're hugely misinformed regarding abuse. Highlighting the errors in your poor thinking is not nitpicking, it's identifying why you're wrong. Your lack of empathy for victims is astounding, you appear to be a callous and immature person, but luckily you can change that by learning why you're wrong. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"those in long term abusive relationships will have been conditioned to accept it conditioned through a ton of psychological abuse. which can be wayyy more damaging than the physical stuff " When I tried to leave my husband he burnt all my clothes I had nothing, I had to walk round the house naked for months I couldn't leave him because it would mean walking down my street naked so I as stuck And I wasnt allowed a mobile so I couldn't call anybody Sometimes leaving a relationship isnt that easy I did it in the end but it took me a lot of years to get out | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"those in long term abusive relationships will have been conditioned to accept it conditioned through a ton of psychological abuse. which can be wayyy more damaging than the physical stuff When I tried to leave my husband he burnt all my clothes I had nothing, I had to walk round the house naked for months I couldn't leave him because it would mean walking down my street naked so I as stuck And I wasnt allowed a mobile so I couldn't call anybody Sometimes leaving a relationship isnt that easy I did it in the end but it took me a lot of years to get out " You sound like such a strong person. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"those in long term abusive relationships will have been conditioned to accept it conditioned through a ton of psychological abuse. which can be wayyy more damaging than the physical stuff When I tried to leave my husband he burnt all my clothes I had nothing, I had to walk round the house naked for months I couldn't leave him because it would mean walking down my street naked so I as stuck And I wasnt allowed a mobile so I couldn't call anybody Sometimes leaving a relationship isnt that easy I did it in the end but it took me a lot of years to get out You sound like such a strong person. " Nah just a twat but I do live in the real world and I know life isn't black and white | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
" I expect people to be more civil/mature than that If you 'expect' civility and maturity shown toward you, maybe try being civil toward others. Blaming the victim of domestic abuse isn't an opinion. It's downright offensive. Blaming the victim of a crime is 'idiotic'. I said that there's no excuse for not going to the police with the evidence to get a restraining order - I never said not doing so is "idiotic". The law is on the side of the victims - if someone physically or mentally/emotionally abused they should go to the police. That's why they are there - they're there to help people. It's ignorant to think ROs are just handed out, and that the victim won't experience repercussions of reporting the crime, and that just contacting the police guarantees protection from an abuser. Also, your expectation of an abuser adhering to an RO seems naive. Needless to say - if they don't initially abide by a restraining order against then then the police it naturally works against them for being stupid enough not to learn from their mistakes because the police are then able to build a stronger case against them. So the first step is always to go to the police as soon as you have evidence that you have been mistreated. So as I said already - there's no excuse for not going to the police when you have the evidence because once you do so you begin the process of ending the cycle of abuse. So as I said - the police are there to help and they will if you are a victim. Your position on abuse is completely naive and immature. No one chooses to be abused, some people don't feel like reporting it as a crime is an option or that they feel like they deserve the abuse due to conditioning. Evidence isn't always available. How do you suggest an abused person who is completely cut off from the outside world records their abuse? I think your short sightedness here is from lack of information, perhaps you ought to look into it and read some case studies, instead of relying on the story of a d*unk girl saying "fuck off". There's more to domestic abuse than just alcohol fuelled arguments, but once you get a well rounded view your ill informed position will most likely change. It takes one phonecall to phone the police! No it doesn't. It takes much more as an investigation has to take place, statements have to be taken. The police aren't there to mediate and solve the situation. You're also assuming an abused person has access to a phone to make a call. From your line of reasoning it seems you're assuming it's impossible for an abused person to ever come in contact with a phone to make a call - it's as near to impossible as it's possible to be for anyone in 2016 to be without access to least one phone anywhere in their life so as far as I'm concered you're just nitpicking for the sake of it. Ring the police to report the crime and you begin the end of the cycle of abuse - it takes just one phone call. You're hugely misinformed regarding abuse. Highlighting the errors in your poor thinking is not nitpicking, it's identifying why you're wrong. Your lack of empathy for victims is astounding, you appear to be a callous and immature person, but luckily you can change that by learning why you're wrong. " What is actually wrong with you! I stated the fact that it CAN be as simple as one phonecall and you accuse me of being a "callous and immature person"? Because IT CAN BE. You're being completely unfair! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
" I expect people to be more civil/mature than that If you 'expect' civility and maturity shown toward you, maybe try being civil toward others. Blaming the victim of domestic abuse isn't an opinion. It's downright offensive. Blaming the victim of a crime is 'idiotic'. I said that there's no excuse for not going to the police with the evidence to get a restraining order - I never said not doing so is "idiotic". The law is on the side of the victims - if someone physically or mentally/emotionally abused they should go to the police. That's why they are there - they're there to help people. It's ignorant to think ROs are just handed out, and that the victim won't experience repercussions of reporting the crime, and that just contacting the police guarantees protection from an abuser. Also, your expectation of an abuser adhering to an RO seems naive. Needless to say - if they don't initially abide by a restraining order against then then the police it naturally works against them for being stupid enough not to learn from their mistakes because the police are then able to build a stronger case against them. So the first step is always to go to the police as soon as you have evidence that you have been mistreated. So as I said already - there's no excuse for not going to the police when you have the evidence because once you do so you begin the process of ending the cycle of abuse. So as I said - the police are there to help and they will if you are a victim. Your position on abuse is completely naive and immature. No one chooses to be abused, some people don't feel like reporting it as a crime is an option or that they feel like they deserve the abuse due to conditioning. Evidence isn't always available. How do you suggest an abused person who is completely cut off from the outside world records their abuse? I think your short sightedness here is from lack of information, perhaps you ought to look into it and read some case studies, instead of relying on the story of a d*unk girl saying "fuck off". There's more to domestic abuse than just alcohol fuelled arguments, but once you get a well rounded view your ill informed position will most likely change. It takes one phonecall to phone the police! No it doesn't. It takes much more as an investigation has to take place, statements have to be taken. The police aren't there to mediate and solve the situation. You're also assuming an abused person has access to a phone to make a call. From your line of reasoning it seems you're assuming it's impossible for an abused person to ever come in contact with a phone to make a call - it's as near to impossible as it's possible to be for anyone in 2016 to be without access to least one phone anywhere in their life so as far as I'm concered you're just nitpicking for the sake of it. Ring the police to report the crime and you begin the end of the cycle of abuse - it takes just one phone call." nitpicking!!! unfeckeingbelievable | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"those in long term abusive relationships will have been conditioned to accept it conditioned through a ton of psychological abuse. which can be wayyy more damaging than the physical stuff When I tried to leave my husband he burnt all my clothes I had nothing, I had to walk round the house naked for months I couldn't leave him because it would mean walking down my street naked so I as stuck And I wasnt allowed a mobile so I couldn't call anybody Sometimes leaving a relationship isnt that easy I did it in the end but it took me a lot of years to get out " cant believe some people glad you got away from him in the end | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
" I expect people to be more civil/mature than that If you 'expect' civility and maturity shown toward you, maybe try being civil toward others. Blaming the victim of domestic abuse isn't an opinion. It's downright offensive. Blaming the victim of a crime is 'idiotic'. I said that there's no excuse for not going to the police with the evidence to get a restraining order - I never said not doing so is "idiotic". The law is on the side of the victims - if someone physically or mentally/emotionally abused they should go to the police. That's why they are there - they're there to help people. It's ignorant to think ROs are just handed out, and that the victim won't experience repercussions of reporting the crime, and that just contacting the police guarantees protection from an abuser. Also, your expectation of an abuser adhering to an RO seems naive. Needless to say - if they don't initially abide by a restraining order against then then the police it naturally works against them for being stupid enough not to learn from their mistakes because the police are then able to build a stronger case against them. So the first step is always to go to the police as soon as you have evidence that you have been mistreated. So as I said already - there's no excuse for not going to the police when you have the evidence because once you do so you begin the process of ending the cycle of abuse. So as I said - the police are there to help and they will if you are a victim. Your position on abuse is completely naive and immature. No one chooses to be abused, some people don't feel like reporting it as a crime is an option or that they feel like they deserve the abuse due to conditioning. Evidence isn't always available. How do you suggest an abused person who is completely cut off from the outside world records their abuse? I think your short sightedness here is from lack of information, perhaps you ought to look into it and read some case studies, instead of relying on the story of a d*unk girl saying "fuck off". There's more to domestic abuse than just alcohol fuelled arguments, but once you get a well rounded view your ill informed position will most likely change. It takes one phonecall to phone the police! No it doesn't. It takes much more as an investigation has to take place, statements have to be taken. The police aren't there to mediate and solve the situation. You're also assuming an abused person has access to a phone to make a call. From your line of reasoning it seems you're assuming it's impossible for an abused person to ever come in contact with a phone to make a call - it's as near to impossible as it's possible to be for anyone in 2016 to be without access to least one phone anywhere in their life so as far as I'm concered you're just nitpicking for the sake of it. Ring the police to report the crime and you begin the end of the cycle of abuse - it takes just one phone call. You're hugely misinformed regarding abuse. Highlighting the errors in your poor thinking is not nitpicking, it's identifying why you're wrong. Your lack of empathy for victims is astounding, you appear to be a callous and immature person, but luckily you can change that by learning why you're wrong. What is actually wrong with you! I stated the fact that it CAN be as simple as one phonecall and you accuse me of being a "callous and immature person"? Because IT CAN BE. You're being completely unfair! " Reasons why you're callous and immature: You called female victims fucking brain dead. You assume the police will save a victim after just one phone call. You assume there will be no repercussions after one phone call. You assume protective/restraining orders are handed out freely. You assume the victim is emotionally able to stand up to their abuser. You assume the victim is to blame for their part in being abused. You assume the victim has freedom to do whatever it takes to stand up to the abuser. You've repeatedly said "it takes one phone call" when not all victims have access to a phone or the outside world. You won't acknowledge your erroneous thinking and accuse people of nitpicking for identifying why you're blatantly wrong. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
" I expect people to be more civil/mature than that If you 'expect' civility and maturity shown toward you, maybe try being civil toward others. Blaming the victim of domestic abuse isn't an opinion. It's downright offensive. Blaming the victim of a crime is 'idiotic'. I said that there's no excuse for not going to the police with the evidence to get a restraining order - I never said not doing so is "idiotic". The law is on the side of the victims - if someone physically or mentally/emotionally abused they should go to the police. That's why they are there - they're there to help people. It's ignorant to think ROs are just handed out, and that the victim won't experience repercussions of reporting the crime, and that just contacting the police guarantees protection from an abuser. Also, your expectation of an abuser adhering to an RO seems naive. Needless to say - if they don't initially abide by a restraining order against then then the police it naturally works against them for being stupid enough not to learn from their mistakes because the police are then able to build a stronger case against them. So the first step is always to go to the police as soon as you have evidence that you have been mistreated. So as I said already - there's no excuse for not going to the police when you have the evidence because once you do so you begin the process of ending the cycle of abuse. So as I said - the police are there to help and they will if you are a victim. As someone who works with victims of domestic abuse I find your comments discusting and ill informed. Those 'stupid' women you are condemning all have their own stories and reasons for staying within the toxic environment. Complex, and with multiple issues, those ladies go through hell before coming to the brave decision to leave (often returning again and again). Stupid is not a word to describe those women. Brave, courageous and survivors are words that you may want to look up, as I doubt anyone without an ounce of compassion for any victim of domestic abuse would understand this issue on any level. " | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
" I expect people to be more civil/mature than that If you 'expect' civility and maturity shown toward you, maybe try being civil toward others. Blaming the victim of domestic abuse isn't an opinion. It's downright offensive. Blaming the victim of a crime is 'idiotic'. I said that there's no excuse for not going to the police with the evidence to get a restraining order - I never said not doing so is "idiotic". The law is on the side of the victims - if someone physically or mentally/emotionally abused they should go to the police. That's why they are there - they're there to help people. It's ignorant to think ROs are just handed out, and that the victim won't experience repercussions of reporting the crime, and that just contacting the police guarantees protection from an abuser. Also, your expectation of an abuser adhering to an RO seems naive. Needless to say - if they don't initially abide by a restraining order against then then the police it naturally works against them for being stupid enough not to learn from their mistakes because the police are then able to build a stronger case against them. So the first step is always to go to the police as soon as you have evidence that you have been mistreated. So as I said already - there's no excuse for not going to the police when you have the evidence because once you do so you begin the process of ending the cycle of abuse. So as I said - the police are there to help and they will if you are a victim. Your position on abuse is completely naive and immature. No one chooses to be abused, some people don't feel like reporting it as a crime is an option or that they feel like they deserve the abuse due to conditioning. Evidence isn't always available. How do you suggest an abused person who is completely cut off from the outside world records their abuse? I think your short sightedness here is from lack of information, perhaps you ought to look into it and read some case studies, instead of relying on the story of a d*unk girl saying "fuck off". There's more to domestic abuse than just alcohol fuelled arguments, but once you get a well rounded view your ill informed position will most likely change. It takes one phonecall to phone the police! No it doesn't. It takes much more as an investigation has to take place, statements have to be taken. The police aren't there to mediate and solve the situation. You're also assuming an abused person has access to a phone to make a call. From your line of reasoning it seems you're assuming it's impossible for an abused person to ever come in contact with a phone to make a call - it's as near to impossible as it's possible to be for anyone in 2016 to be without access to least one phone anywhere in their life so as far as I'm concered you're just nitpicking for the sake of it. Ring the police to report the crime and you begin the end of the cycle of abuse - it takes just one phone call. You're hugely misinformed regarding abuse. Highlighting the errors in your poor thinking is not nitpicking, it's identifying why you're wrong. Your lack of empathy for victims is astounding, you appear to be a callous and immature person, but luckily you can change that by learning why you're wrong. What is actually wrong with you! I stated the fact that it CAN be as simple as one phonecall and you accuse me of being a "callous and immature person"? Because IT CAN BE. You're being completely unfair! Reasons why you're callous and immature: You called female victims fucking brain dead. You assume the police will save a victim after just one phone call. You assume there will be no repercussions after one phone call. You assume protective/restraining orders are handed out freely. You assume the victim is emotionally able to stand up to their abuser. You assume the victim is to blame for their part in being abused. You assume the victim has freedom to do whatever it takes to stand up to the abuser. You've repeatedly said "it takes one phone call" when not all victims have access to a phone or the outside world. You won't acknowledge your erroneous thinking and accuse people of nitpicking for identifying why you're blatantly wrong. " You said - Reasons why you're callous and immature: 1. "You called female victims fucking brain dead." That doesn't mean I said ALL victims are - I never said that so I clearly don't think ALL victims are. I said already the obvious - which is that the smart thing to do is to call the police to begin the process of breaking the cycle of abuse so the opposite of that is that it's stupid not to - hence those that don't do so are "brain dead" - strong wording of course but I mean to say that it's stupid not to try to get out of the situation as it's NOT impossible to do so. 2. "You assume the police will save a victim after just one phone call." No I do not assume such a thing, but they "could" do so after one phone call so clearly they are capable of doing so. 3. "You assume there will be no repercussions after one phone call" Eh, no I don't! 4. "You assume protective/restraining orders are handed out freely." Again, no I don't! It's just easier for your nitpickng to say I mean that when I clearly don't. 5. "You assume the victim is emotionally able to stand up to their abuser." Again, no I don't but it would clearly help the situation if they were. 6. "You assume the victim is to blame for their part in being abused." Truth be told - if they don't do ANYTHING to help themselves then they are partially responsible for it continuing to happen - the same is true for anyone that knows of abuse and does nothing to stop it. FACT. 7. "You assume the victim has freedom to do whatever it takes to stand up to the abuser." Again, no I don't because nobody is without any options in life - at the very least they could make at least one phone call to the police even if they don't have their own phone because as I said ealier - nobody is at all times without access to at least one phone. 8. "You've repeatedly said "it takes one phone call" when not all victims have access to a phone or the outside world." Even Elisabeth Fritzl broke the cycle after 20 something years WITHOUT ACCESS TO A PHONE after being buried in the ground. So unless completely you are locked up without access to anyone, ever, in a completely secure automated environment that will take care of all your life long needs by permanently cutting you off from all human contact then it clearly isn't impossible to do SOMETHING to help yourself. 9. "You won't acknowledge your erroneous thinking and accuse people of nitpicking for identifying why you're blatantly wrong." I honeslty think you're just nitpicking by wording your posts to make it appear that I'm saying, or meaning to say, things that I'm clearly not saying - so as I've just made clear here - I'm blatantly not wrong. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
" I expect people to be more civil/mature than that If you 'expect' civility and maturity shown toward you, maybe try being civil toward others. Blaming the victim of domestic abuse isn't an opinion. It's downright offensive. Blaming the victim of a crime is 'idiotic'. I said that there's no excuse for not going to the police with the evidence to get a restraining order - I never said not doing so is "idiotic". The law is on the side of the victims - if someone physically or mentally/emotionally abused they should go to the police. That's why they are there - they're there to help people. It's ignorant to think ROs are just handed out, and that the victim won't experience repercussions of reporting the crime, and that just contacting the police guarantees protection from an abuser. Also, your expectation of an abuser adhering to an RO seems naive. Needless to say - if they don't initially abide by a restraining order against then then the police it naturally works against them for being stupid enough not to learn from their mistakes because the police are then able to build a stronger case against them. So the first step is always to go to the police as soon as you have evidence that you have been mistreated. So as I said already - there's no excuse for not going to the police when you have the evidence because once you do so you begin the process of ending the cycle of abuse. So as I said - the police are there to help and they will if you are a victim. Your position on abuse is completely naive and immature. No one chooses to be abused, some people don't feel like reporting it as a crime is an option or that they feel like they deserve the abuse due to conditioning. Evidence isn't always available. How do you suggest an abused person who is completely cut off from the outside world records their abuse? I think your short sightedness here is from lack of information, perhaps you ought to look into it and read some case studies, instead of relying on the story of a d*unk girl saying "fuck off". There's more to domestic abuse than just alcohol fuelled arguments, but once you get a well rounded view your ill informed position will most likely change. It takes one phonecall to phone the police! No it doesn't. It takes much more as an investigation has to take place, statements have to be taken. The police aren't there to mediate and solve the situation. You're also assuming an abused person has access to a phone to make a call. From your line of reasoning it seems you're assuming it's impossible for an abused person to ever come in contact with a phone to make a call - it's as near to impossible as it's possible to be for anyone in 2016 to be without access to least one phone anywhere in their life so as far as I'm concered you're just nitpicking for the sake of it. Ring the police to report the crime and you begin the end of the cycle of abuse - it takes just one phone call. You're hugely misinformed regarding abuse. Highlighting the errors in your poor thinking is not nitpicking, it's identifying why you're wrong. Your lack of empathy for victims is astounding, you appear to be a callous and immature person, but luckily you can change that by learning why you're wrong. What is actually wrong with you! I stated the fact that it CAN be as simple as one phonecall and you accuse me of being a "callous and immature person"? Because IT CAN BE. You're being completely unfair! Reasons why you're callous and immature: You called female victims fucking brain dead. You assume the police will save a victim after just one phone call. You assume there will be no repercussions after one phone call. You assume protective/restraining orders are handed out freely. You assume the victim is emotionally able to stand up to their abuser. You assume the victim is to blame for their part in being abused. You assume the victim has freedom to do whatever it takes to stand up to the abuser. You've repeatedly said "it takes one phone call" when not all victims have access to a phone or the outside world. You won't acknowledge your erroneous thinking and accuse people of nitpicking for identifying why you're blatantly wrong. You said - Reasons why you're callous and immature: 1. "You called female victims fucking brain dead." That doesn't mean I said ALL victims are - I never said that so I clearly don't think ALL victims are. I said already the obvious - which is that the smart thing to do is to call the police to begin the process of breaking the cycle of abuse so the opposite of that is that it's stupid not to - hence those that don't do so are "brain dead" - strong wording of course but I mean to say that it's stupid not to try to get out of the situation as it's NOT impossible to do so. 2. "You assume the police will save a victim after just one phone call." No I do not assume such a thing, but they "could" do so after one phone call so clearly they are capable of doing so. 3. "You assume there will be no repercussions after one phone call" Eh, no I don't! 4. "You assume protective/restraining orders are handed out freely." Again, no I don't! It's just easier for your nitpickng to say I mean that when I clearly don't. 5. "You assume the victim is emotionally able to stand up to their abuser." Again, no I don't but it would clearly help the situation if they were. 6. "You assume the victim is to blame for their part in being abused." Truth be told - if they don't do ANYTHING to help themselves then they are partially responsible for it continuing to happen - the same is true for anyone that knows of abuse and does nothing to stop it. FACT. 7. "You assume the victim has freedom to do whatever it takes to stand up to the abuser." Again, no I don't because nobody is without any options in life - at the very least they could make at least one phone call to the police even if they don't have their own phone because as I said ealier - nobody is at all times without access to at least one phone. 8. "You've repeatedly said "it takes one phone call" when not all victims have access to a phone or the outside world." Even Elisabeth Fritzl broke the cycle after 20 something years WITHOUT ACCESS TO A PHONE after being buried in the ground. So unless completely you are locked up without access to anyone, ever, in a completely secure automated environment that will take care of all your life long needs by permanently cutting you off from all human contact then it clearly isn't impossible to do SOMETHING to help yourself. 9. "You won't acknowledge your erroneous thinking and accuse people of nitpicking for identifying why you're blatantly wrong." I honeslty think you're just nitpicking by wording your posts to make it appear that I'm saying, or meaning to say, things that I'm clearly not saying - so as I've just made clear here - I'm blatantly not wrong." Surely Elizabeth Fritzl's father, her abuser, broke the cycle of abuse by letting one of her children who was ill go to hospital. She couldn't because she had no access to a phone or the outside world at all. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"That happened to me too. The guy was beating up on his partner so I stepped in and SHE told me to fuck off. Is response to everyone saying similar to this- She HAS to stick up for her man out of fear he will beat the shit out of her even worse later on. Abuse victims walk on eggshells all the time. Any little thing can make their abuser mad. You may well get slated by the woman but somewhere inside her she will appreciate the fact that someone helped. It will give her a glimmer of hope that she IS worthy of being liked - even though he tells her she's worthless. Please don't be mad at her. x" | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
" I expect people to be more civil/mature than that If you 'expect' civility and maturity shown toward you, maybe try being civil toward others. Blaming the victim of domestic abuse isn't an opinion. It's downright offensive. Blaming the victim of a crime is 'idiotic'. I said that there's no excuse for not going to the police with the evidence to get a restraining order - I never said not doing so is "idiotic". The law is on the side of the victims - if someone physically or mentally/emotionally abused they should go to the police. That's why they are there - they're there to help people. It's ignorant to think ROs are just handed out, and that the victim won't experience repercussions of reporting the crime, and that just contacting the police guarantees protection from an abuser. Also, your expectation of an abuser adhering to an RO seems naive. Needless to say - if they don't initially abide by a restraining order against then then the police it naturally works against them for being stupid enough not to learn from their mistakes because the police are then able to build a stronger case against them. So the first step is always to go to the police as soon as you have evidence that you have been mistreated. So as I said already - there's no excuse for not going to the police when you have the evidence because once you do so you begin the process of ending the cycle of abuse. So as I said - the police are there to help and they will if you are a victim. Your position on abuse is completely naive and immature. No one chooses to be abused, some people don't feel like reporting it as a crime is an option or that they feel like they deserve the abuse due to conditioning. Evidence isn't always available. How do you suggest an abused person who is completely cut off from the outside world records their abuse? I think your short sightedness here is from lack of information, perhaps you ought to look into it and read some case studies, instead of relying on the story of a d*unk girl saying "fuck off". There's more to domestic abuse than just alcohol fuelled arguments, but once you get a well rounded view your ill informed position will most likely change. It takes one phonecall to phone the police! No it doesn't. It takes much more as an investigation has to take place, statements have to be taken. The police aren't there to mediate and solve the situation. You're also assuming an abused person has access to a phone to make a call. From your line of reasoning it seems you're assuming it's impossible for an abused person to ever come in contact with a phone to make a call - it's as near to impossible as it's possible to be for anyone in 2016 to be without access to least one phone anywhere in their life so as far as I'm concered you're just nitpicking for the sake of it. Ring the police to report the crime and you begin the end of the cycle of abuse - it takes just one phone call. You're hugely misinformed regarding abuse. Highlighting the errors in your poor thinking is not nitpicking, it's identifying why you're wrong. Your lack of empathy for victims is astounding, you appear to be a callous and immature person, but luckily you can change that by learning why you're wrong. What is actually wrong with you! I stated the fact that it CAN be as simple as one phonecall and you accuse me of being a "callous and immature person"? Because IT CAN BE. You're being completely unfair! Reasons why you're callous and immature: You called female victims fucking brain dead. You assume the police will save a victim after just one phone call. You assume there will be no repercussions after one phone call. You assume protective/restraining orders are handed out freely. You assume the victim is emotionally able to stand up to their abuser. You assume the victim is to blame for their part in being abused. You assume the victim has freedom to do whatever it takes to stand up to the abuser. You've repeatedly said "it takes one phone call" when not all victims have access to a phone or the outside world. You won't acknowledge your erroneous thinking and accuse people of nitpicking for identifying why you're blatantly wrong. You said - Reasons why you're callous and immature: 1. "You called female victims fucking brain dead." That doesn't mean I said ALL victims are - I never said that so I clearly don't think ALL victims are. I said already the obvious - which is that the smart thing to do is to call the police to begin the process of breaking the cycle of abuse so the opposite of that is that it's stupid not to - hence those that don't do so are "brain dead" - strong wording of course but I mean to say that it's stupid not to try to get out of the situation as it's NOT impossible to do so. 2. "You assume the police will save a victim after just one phone call." No I do not assume such a thing, but they "could" do so after one phone call so clearly they are capable of doing so. 3. "You assume there will be no repercussions after one phone call" Eh, no I don't! 4. "You assume protective/restraining orders are handed out freely." Again, no I don't! It's just easier for your nitpickng to say I mean that when I clearly don't. 5. "You assume the victim is emotionally able to stand up to their abuser." Again, no I don't but it would clearly help the situation if they were. 6. "You assume the victim is to blame for their part in being abused." Truth be told - if they don't do ANYTHING to help themselves then they are partially responsible for it continuing to happen - the same is true for anyone that knows of abuse and does nothing to stop it. FACT. 7. "You assume the victim has freedom to do whatever it takes to stand up to the abuser." Again, no I don't because nobody is without any options in life - at the very least they could make at least one phone call to the police even if they don't have their own phone because as I said ealier - nobody is at all times without access to at least one phone. 8. "You've repeatedly said "it takes one phone call" when not all victims have access to a phone or the outside world." Even Elisabeth Fritzl broke the cycle after 20 something years WITHOUT ACCESS TO A PHONE after being buried in the ground. So unless completely you are locked up without access to anyone, ever, in a completely secure automated environment that will take care of all your life long needs by permanently cutting you off from all human contact then it clearly isn't impossible to do SOMETHING to help yourself. 9. "You won't acknowledge your erroneous thinking and accuse people of nitpicking for identifying why you're blatantly wrong." I honeslty think you're just nitpicking by wording your posts to make it appear that I'm saying, or meaning to say, things that I'm clearly not saying - so as I've just made clear here - I'm blatantly not wrong. Surely Elizabeth Fritzl's father, her abuser, broke the cycle of abuse by letting one of her children who was ill go to hospital. She couldn't because she had no access to a phone or the outside world at all. " That's incorrect - they were all taken in to police custody after visting the hospital and after the police questioned Elisabeth SHE decided to tell them the truth. It was her decision to tell them - she could have decided to keep quiet but she didn't - she decided to tell the police everything because that was clearly the right thing to do. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
" I expect people to be more civil/mature than that If you 'expect' civility and maturity shown toward you, maybe try being civil toward others. Blaming the victim of domestic abuse isn't an opinion. It's downright offensive. Blaming the victim of a crime is 'idiotic'. I said that there's no excuse for not going to the police with the evidence to get a restraining order - I never said not doing so is "idiotic". The law is on the side of the victims - if someone physically or mentally/emotionally abused they should go to the police. That's why they are there - they're there to help people. It's ignorant to think ROs are just handed out, and that the victim won't experience repercussions of reporting the crime, and that just contacting the police guarantees protection from an abuser. Also, your expectation of an abuser adhering to an RO seems naive. Needless to say - if they don't initially abide by a restraining order against then then the police it naturally works against them for being stupid enough not to learn from their mistakes because the police are then able to build a stronger case against them. So the first step is always to go to the police as soon as you have evidence that you have been mistreated. So as I said already - there's no excuse for not going to the police when you have the evidence because once you do so you begin the process of ending the cycle of abuse. So as I said - the police are there to help and they will if you are a victim. Your position on abuse is completely naive and immature. No one chooses to be abused, some people don't feel like reporting it as a crime is an option or that they feel like they deserve the abuse due to conditioning. Evidence isn't always available. How do you suggest an abused person who is completely cut off from the outside world records their abuse? I think your short sightedness here is from lack of information, perhaps you ought to look into it and read some case studies, instead of relying on the story of a d*unk girl saying "fuck off". There's more to domestic abuse than just alcohol fuelled arguments, but once you get a well rounded view your ill informed position will most likely change. It takes one phonecall to phone the police! No it doesn't. It takes much more as an investigation has to take place, statements have to be taken. The police aren't there to mediate and solve the situation. You're also assuming an abused person has access to a phone to make a call. From your line of reasoning it seems you're assuming it's impossible for an abused person to ever come in contact with a phone to make a call - it's as near to impossible as it's possible to be for anyone in 2016 to be without access to least one phone anywhere in their life so as far as I'm concered you're just nitpicking for the sake of it. Ring the police to report the crime and you begin the end of the cycle of abuse - it takes just one phone call. You're hugely misinformed regarding abuse. Highlighting the errors in your poor thinking is not nitpicking, it's identifying why you're wrong. Your lack of empathy for victims is astounding, you appear to be a callous and immature person, but luckily you can change that by learning why you're wrong. What is actually wrong with you! I stated the fact that it CAN be as simple as one phonecall and you accuse me of being a "callous and immature person"? Because IT CAN BE. You're being completely unfair! Reasons why you're callous and immature: You called female victims fucking brain dead. You assume the police will save a victim after just one phone call. You assume there will be no repercussions after one phone call. You assume protective/restraining orders are handed out freely. You assume the victim is emotionally able to stand up to their abuser. You assume the victim is to blame for their part in being abused. You assume the victim has freedom to do whatever it takes to stand up to the abuser. You've repeatedly said "it takes one phone call" when not all victims have access to a phone or the outside world. You won't acknowledge your erroneous thinking and accuse people of nitpicking for identifying why you're blatantly wrong. You said - Reasons why you're callous and immature: 1. "You called female victims fucking brain dead." That doesn't mean I said ALL victims are - I never said that so I clearly don't think ALL victims are. I said already the obvious - which is that the smart thing to do is to call the police to begin the process of breaking the cycle of abuse so the opposite of that is that it's stupid not to - hence those that don't do so are "brain dead" - strong wording of course but I mean to say that it's stupid not to try to get out of the situation as it's NOT impossible to do so. 2. "You assume the police will save a victim after just one phone call." No I do not assume such a thing, but they "could" do so after one phone call so clearly they are capable of doing so. 3. "You assume there will be no repercussions after one phone call" Eh, no I don't! 4. "You assume protective/restraining orders are handed out freely." Again, no I don't! It's just easier for your nitpickng to say I mean that when I clearly don't. 5. "You assume the victim is emotionally able to stand up to their abuser." Again, no I don't but it would clearly help the situation if they were. 6. "You assume the victim is to blame for their part in being abused." Truth be told - if they don't do ANYTHING to help themselves then they are partially responsible for it continuing to happen - the same is true for anyone that knows of abuse and does nothing to stop it. FACT. 7. "You assume the victim has freedom to do whatever it takes to stand up to the abuser." Again, no I don't because nobody is without any options in life - at the very least they could make at least one phone call to the police even if they don't have their own phone because as I said ealier - nobody is at all times without access to at least one phone. 8. "You've repeatedly said "it takes one phone call" when not all victims have access to a phone or the outside world." Even Elisabeth Fritzl broke the cycle after 20 something years WITHOUT ACCESS TO A PHONE after being buried in the ground. So unless completely you are locked up without access to anyone, ever, in a completely secure automated environment that will take care of all your life long needs by permanently cutting you off from all human contact then it clearly isn't impossible to do SOMETHING to help yourself. 9. "You won't acknowledge your erroneous thinking and accuse people of nitpicking for identifying why you're blatantly wrong." I honeslty think you're just nitpicking by wording your posts to make it appear that I'm saying, or meaning to say, things that I'm clearly not saying - so as I've just made clear here - I'm blatantly not wrong. Surely Elizabeth Fritzl's father, her abuser, broke the cycle of abuse by letting one of her children who was ill go to hospital. She couldn't because she had no access to a phone or the outside world at all. That's incorrect - they were all taken in to police custody after visting the hospital and after the police questioned Elisabeth SHE decided to tell them the truth. It was her decision to tell them - she could have decided to keep quiet but she didn't - she decided to tell the police everything because that was clearly the right thing to do." Ok, but the abuser was still the one who had to take first step in that case. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"If it weren't such a serious topic, this would be hilarious " makes me sad that someone is just so completly unaware even after being told the same thing over and over again | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"If it weren't such a serious topic, this would be hilarious makes me sad that someone is just so completly unaware even after being told the same thing over and over again" Well that's obviously a negative undertoned insinuation towards me so I'd prefer it if you refrained from such conduct because there's no reason for us to avoid being civil here. I've taken quite some effort to explain myself to everyone here and as a result I've made it very clear that I haven't said anything "wrong". My initial post was strongly worded of course but I have since explained myself so please be more courteous in future | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"If it weren't such a serious topic, this would be hilarious makes me sad that someone is just so completly unaware even after being told the same thing over and over again Well that's obviously a negative undertoned insinuation towards me so I'd prefer it if you refrained from such conduct because there's no reason for us to avoid being civil here. I've taken quite some effort to explain myself to everyone here and as a result I've made it very clear that I haven't said anything "wrong". My initial post was strongly worded of course but I have since explained myself so please be more courteous in future" your just making it worse. Im a woman who was a victim of domestic abuse who didnt report it to the police. You dont have to insinuate anything its there in black and white now if you want to go play " im the victim" card go do it with someone else cause it doesnt wash with me. " negative undertoned insinuation" if you want to stand by what you say fair play but the victim game doesnt work with me | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"If it weren't such a serious topic, this would be hilarious makes me sad that someone is just so completly unaware even after being told the same thing over and over again Well that's obviously a negative undertoned insinuation towards me so I'd prefer it if you refrained from such conduct because there's no reason for us to avoid being civil here. I've taken quite some effort to explain myself to everyone here and as a result I've made it very clear that I haven't said anything "wrong". My initial post was strongly worded of course but I have since explained myself so please be more courteous in futureyour just making it worse. Im a woman who was a victim of domestic abuse who didnt report it to the police. You dont have to insinuate anything its there in black and white now if you want to go play " im the victim" card go do it with someone else cause it doesnt wash with me. " negative undertoned insinuation" if you want to stand by what you say fair play but the victim game doesnt work with me" I just said there's no need for us to avoid being civil here - nothing more nothing less | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"If it weren't such a serious topic, this would be hilarious makes me sad that someone is just so completly unaware even after being told the same thing over and over again its actually quite interesting and is a trait of autistic people, whereby they have a one track mind regarding certain types of information, regardless of that information being correct or not...they just have to get the point across by whatever means " Excuse me but I'm not the one nitpicking here - I'm being bombarded on all sides by nitpickers and have to explain myself as a result. I expect you'll say something ridiculous now like "oh I wasn't talking about you so are you saying you're autistic then or what?" but don't bother because there's no need for that or your obvious insinuation either. I'm getting bombarded so obviously I'm going to have to explain myself! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"If it weren't such a serious topic, this would be hilarious makes me sad that someone is just so completly unaware even after being told the same thing over and over again Well that's obviously a negative undertoned insinuation towards me so I'd prefer it if you refrained from such conduct because there's no reason for us to avoid being civil here. I've taken quite some effort to explain myself to everyone here and as a result I've made it very clear that I haven't said anything "wrong". My initial post was strongly worded of course but I have since explained myself so please be more courteous in futureyour just making it worse. Im a woman who was a victim of domestic abuse who didnt report it to the police. You dont have to insinuate anything its there in black and white now if you want to go play " im the victim" card go do it with someone else cause it doesnt wash with me. " negative undertoned insinuation" if you want to stand by what you say fair play but the victim game doesnt work with me I just said there's no need for us to avoid being civil herer - nothing more nothing less" no you didnt i have no idea why you keep saying you didnt say stuff when anyone can read it) | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"If it weren't such a serious topic, this would be hilarious makes me sad that someone is just so completly unaware even after being told the same thing over and over again" He doesn't have to agree with any of us though | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"If it weren't such a serious topic, this would be hilarious makes me sad that someone is just so completly unaware even after being told the same thing over and over again Well that's obviously a negative undertoned insinuation towards me so I'd prefer it if you refrained from such conduct because there's no reason for us to avoid being civil here. I've taken quite some effort to explain myself to everyone here and as a result I've made it very clear that I haven't said anything "wrong". My initial post was strongly worded of course but I have since explained myself so please be more courteous in futureyour just making it worse. Im a woman who was a victim of domestic abuse who didnt report it to the police. You dont have to insinuate anything its there in black and white now if you want to go play " im the victim" card go do it with someone else cause it doesnt wash with me. " negative undertoned insinuation" if you want to stand by what you say fair play but the victim game doesnt work with me I just said there's no need for us to avoid being civil herer - nothing more nothing lessno you didnt i have no idea why you keep saying you didnt say stuff when anyone can read it)" Read back over it all - you may be of the opinion that I said something "wrong" but your opinion doesn't mean it IS wrong. It means TO YOU it's "wrong". You're entitled to your opinion and I'm entitled to mine. So lets agree to disagree because I don't actually want to argue with you as it's beyond tiresome now | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
back to top |