Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It's like an election. You must be: be registered to vote be 18 or over on the day of the referendum (‘polling day’) be a British, Irish or Commonwealth citizen be resident at an address in the UK or Gibraltar (or a British citizen living abroad who has been registered to vote in the UK in the last 15 years) not be legally excluded from voting" clarify this a bit... its like a general election.... eu citizens are allowed to vote in the locals and the europeans.... but not in the general election or this.... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Commonwealth migrants from 54 states - including Australia, Canada, India, Pakistan and Nigeria - can join the electoral rolland vote in the EU referendum as long are they are residents in the UK. Unlike the general election, Commonwealth citizens in Gibraltar are also eligible to vote in the EU referendum Citizens from other European countries - apart from Ireland, Malta and Cyprus - will not get a vote on whether the UK remains part of the EU " So how do you think these EU citizens living here will vote ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Commonwealth migrants from 54 states - including Australia, Canada, India, Pakistan and Nigeria - can join the electoral rolland vote in the EU referendum as long are they are residents in the UK. Unlike the general election, Commonwealth citizens in Gibraltar are also eligible to vote in the EU referendum Citizens from other European countries - apart from Ireland, Malta and Cyprus - will not get a vote on whether the UK remains part of the EU So how do you think these EU citizens living here will vote ?" Do you mean which way will they vote? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Commonwealth migrants from 54 states - including Australia, Canada, India, Pakistan and Nigeria - can join the electoral rolland vote in the EU referendum as long are they are residents in the UK. Unlike the general election, Commonwealth citizens in Gibraltar are also eligible to vote in the EU referendum Citizens from other European countries - apart from Ireland, Malta and Cyprus - will not get a vote on whether the UK remains part of the EU So how do you think these EU citizens living here will vote ? Do you mean which way will they vote?" Yes ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It's like an election. You must be: be registered to vote be 18 or over on the day of the referendum (‘polling day’) be a British, Irish or Commonwealth citizen be resident at an address in the UK or Gibraltar (or a British citizen living abroad who has been registered to vote in the UK in the last 15 years) not be legally excluded from voting" I thought ex pats couldn't vote. I mean, what happens if they vote out? Do they get escorted from Spain and booted on to a boat back to Blighty? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Commonwealth migrants from 54 states - including Australia, Canada, India, Pakistan and Nigeria - can join the electoral rolland vote in the EU referendum as long are they are residents in the UK. Unlike the general election, Commonwealth citizens in Gibraltar are also eligible to vote in the EU referendum Citizens from other European countries - apart from Ireland, Malta and Cyprus - will not get a vote on whether the UK remains part of the EU So how do you think these EU citizens living here will vote ? Do you mean which way will they vote?Yes ?" I'd be camped in the betting shop if I knew that! I'm guessing they would want us to remain. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Commonwealth migrants from 54 states - including Australia, Canada, India, Pakistan and Nigeria - can join the electoral rolland vote in the EU referendum as long are they are residents in the UK. Unlike the general election, Commonwealth citizens in Gibraltar are also eligible to vote in the EU referendum Citizens from other European countries - apart from Ireland, Malta and Cyprus - will not get a vote on whether the UK remains part of the EU So how do you think these EU citizens living here will vote ? Do you mean which way will they vote?Yes ? I'd be camped in the betting shop if I knew that! I'm guessing they would want us to remain." This is our opinion no UK passport = no vote | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Commonwealth migrants from 54 states - including Australia, Canada, India, Pakistan and Nigeria - can join the electoral rolland vote in the EU referendum as long are they are residents in the UK. Unlike the general election, Commonwealth citizens in Gibraltar are also eligible to vote in the EU referendum Citizens from other European countries - apart from Ireland, Malta and Cyprus - will not get a vote on whether the UK remains part of the EU So how do you think these EU citizens living here will vote ? Do you mean which way will they vote?Yes ? I'd be camped in the betting shop if I knew that! I'm guessing they would want us to remain.This is our opinion no UK passport = no vote " daft idea .... it's like saying no driving licence = no vote | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" I thought ex pats couldn't vote. I mean, what happens if they vote out? Do they get escorted from Spain and booted on to a boat back to Blighty?" well if you are going to make people from spain have to have visa's to live or work here....why would they not return the favour, i am sure there would be backlashes from certain countries.... the other thing is that you would be replacing working aged people who would be paying taxes for older people who would be more of a strain on services like the nhs.... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Commonwealth migrants from 54 states - including Australia, Canada, India, Pakistan and Nigeria - can join the electoral rolland vote in the EU referendum as long are they are residents in the UK. Unlike the general election, Commonwealth citizens in Gibraltar are also eligible to vote in the EU referendum Citizens from other European countries - apart from Ireland, Malta and Cyprus - will not get a vote on whether the UK remains part of the EU So how do you think these EU citizens living here will vote ? Do you mean which way will they vote?Yes ? I'd be camped in the betting shop if I knew that! I'm guessing they would want us to remain.This is our opinion no UK passport = no vote daft idea .... it's like saying no driving licence = no vote" Why? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Commonwealth migrants from 54 states - including Australia, Canada, India, Pakistan and Nigeria - can join the electoral rolland vote in the EU referendum as long are they are residents in the UK. Unlike the general election, Commonwealth citizens in Gibraltar are also eligible to vote in the EU referendum Citizens from other European countries - apart from Ireland, Malta and Cyprus - will not get a vote on whether the UK remains part of the EU So how do you think these EU citizens living here will vote ? Do you mean which way will they vote?Yes ? I'd be camped in the betting shop if I knew that! I'm guessing they would want us to remain.This is our opinion no UK passport = no vote daft idea .... it's like saying no driving licence = no voteWhy?" because not every british citizen has needed to apply for a passport obviously | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Commonwealth migrants from 54 states - including Australia, Canada, India, Pakistan and Nigeria - can join the electoral rolland vote in the EU referendum as long are they are residents in the UK. Unlike the general election, Commonwealth citizens in Gibraltar are also eligible to vote in the EU referendum Citizens from other European countries - apart from Ireland, Malta and Cyprus - will not get a vote on whether the UK remains part of the EU So how do you think these EU citizens living here will vote ? Do you mean which way will they vote?Yes ? I'd be camped in the betting shop if I knew that! I'm guessing they would want us to remain.This is our opinion no UK passport = no vote " Brilliant: So as 17%of UK citizens don't have a passport; you think they should not vote? Why do you need a passport to vote? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Commonwealth migrants from 54 states - including Australia, Canada, India, Pakistan and Nigeria - can join the electoral rolland vote in the EU referendum as long are they are residents in the UK. Unlike the general election, Commonwealth citizens in Gibraltar are also eligible to vote in the EU referendum Citizens from other European countries - apart from Ireland, Malta and Cyprus - will not get a vote on whether the UK remains part of the EU So how do you think these EU citizens living here will vote ? Do you mean which way will they vote?Yes ? I'd be camped in the betting shop if I knew that! I'm guessing they would want us to remain.This is our opinion no UK passport = no vote daft idea .... it's like saying no driving licence = no voteWhy? because not every british citizen has needed to apply for a passport obviously " True should have worded it differently . Not a British citizen = no vote | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It's like an election. You must be: be registered to vote be 18 or over on the day of the referendum (‘polling day’) be a British, Irish or Commonwealth citizen be resident at an address in the UK or Gibraltar (or a British citizen living abroad who has been registered to vote in the UK in the last 15 years) not be legally excluded from voting" | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Think its was meant as people who are entitled to a uk passport not just the ones actually in possession of one Slaps hand in face muttering FFS" That is what we meant | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Think its was meant as people who are entitled to a uk passport not just the ones actually in possession of one Slaps hand in face muttering FFS That is what we meant " so what's the criteria for your revised idea? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"if you are on the electoral roll in this country then you get a vote" That's not true, to the chagrin of my other half. He's on the electoral register and can vote in general elections but not the eu referendum because he's a Dutch national. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Think its was meant as people who are entitled to a uk passport not just the ones actually in possession of one Slaps hand in face muttering FFS That is what we meant " There are quite a lot of people in UK ( and outside ) the UK who are entitled to ( and hold) a UK passport, but who are not British citizens and are not entitled to vote. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"As Nigel Farage pointed out on tonights live debate on itv, we don't have British passports anymore as members of the EU. What we actually have is a European (EU) passport, get your passport now and have a look it. It says clearly on the front. Nigel Farage even got his own passport out and held it up to show the audience. Let's leave the EU and go back to having British ptassports again. " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"As Nigel Farage pointed out on tonights live debate on itv, we don't have British passports anymore as members of the EU. What we actually have is a European (EU) passport, get your passport now and have a look it. It says clearly on the front. Nigel Farage even got his own passport out and held it up to show the audience. Let's leave the EU and go back to having British passports again. " what complete and utter jingoistic bollox! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Just checked, mine says "Her Britannic Majesty of Great Britain and Northern Ireland"" They do say 'European Union' in smaller caps above 'United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland'. The text in the inside front asserts it is Her Britannic Majesty's Secretary of State and not the EU that requests the bearer is allowed to pass freely. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"As Nigel Farage pointed out on tonights live debate on itv, we don't have British passports anymore as members of the EU. What we actually have is a European (EU) passport, get your passport now and have a look it. It says clearly on the front. Nigel Farage even got his own passport out and held it up to show the audience. Let's leave the EU and go back to having British passports again. " No: It's a British passport . Issued by the British government. No one else can issue it. Like a French passport is issued by the French government, German by German etc. It's just in a standardised EU format . Same as driving licences are UK/ French/ German , but in a standard format; As are car registration documents . Just another Farage trick to make the Simple minded think that the EU " controls everything" | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"As Nigel Farage pointed out on tonights live debate on itv, we don't have British passports anymore as members of the EU. What we actually have is a European (EU) passport, get your passport now and have a look it. It says clearly on the front. Nigel Farage even got his own passport out and held it up to show the audience. Let's leave the EU and go back to having British ptassports again. " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"As Nigel Farage pointed out on tonights live debate on itv, we don't have British passports anymore as members of the EU. What we actually have is a European (EU) passport, get your passport now and have a look it. It says clearly on the front. Nigel Farage even got his own passport out and held it up to show the audience. Let's leave the EU and go back to having British passports again. No: It's a British passport . Issued by the British government. No one else can issue it. Like a French passport is issued by the French government, German by German etc. It's just in a standardised EU format . Same as driving licences are UK/ French/ German , but in a standard format; As are car registration documents . Just another Farage trick to make the Simple minded think that the EU " controls everything"" Your posts make me you. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"As Nigel Farage pointed out on tonights live debate on itv, we don't have British passports anymore as members of the EU. What we actually have is a European (EU) passport, get your passport now and have a look it. It says clearly on the front. Nigel Farage even got his own passport out and held it up to show the audience. Let's leave the EU and go back to having British passports again. No: It's a British passport . Issued by the British government. No one else can issue it. Like a French passport is issued by the French government, German by German etc. It's just in a standardised EU format . Same as driving licences are UK/ French/ German , but in a standard format; As are car registration documents . Just another Farage trick to make the Simple minded think that the EU " controls everything"" He is right not trick at all | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"As Nigel Farage pointed out on tonights live debate on itv, we don't have British passports anymore as members of the EU. What we actually have is a European (EU) passport, get your passport now and have a look it. It says clearly on the front. Nigel Farage even got his own passport out and held it up to show the audience. Let's leave the EU and go back to having British passports again. No: It's a British passport . Issued by the British government. No one else can issue it. Like a French passport is issued by the French government, German by German etc. It's just in a standardised EU format . Same as driving licences are UK/ French/ German , but in a standard format; As are car registration documents . Just another Farage trick to make the Simple minded think that the EU " controls everything"He is right not trick at all" So who issues the passport? Is it an EU passport office ? No; it is the UK government passport office; It is a silly trick to fool the simple minded : And he know that it will have impact; because it's the first rule of propaganda; it doesn't matter what lie you tell; people remember what you have said; and don't hear the correction afterwards. And 90% of people hear a statement and don't question it. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Just checked, mine says "Her Britannic Majesty of Great Britain and Northern Ireland"" Funny mine clearly says "EUROPEAN UNION UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND" | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Just checked, mine says "Her Britannic Majesty of Great Britain and Northern Ireland" Funny mine clearly says "EUROPEAN UNION UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND"" Yes; Do does mine And my French one says Union europeénne République francais Because that denotes that we are part of the EU; But the British passport is granted solely by the British government; by no-one else; So it is a British passport Not an EU passport; just in a EU format. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Just checked, mine says "Her Britannic Majesty of Great Britain and Northern Ireland" Funny mine clearly says "EUROPEAN UNION UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND" Yes; Do does mine And my French one says Union europeénne République francais Because that denotes that we are part of the EU; But the British passport is granted solely by the British government; by no-one else; So it is a British passport Not an EU passport; just in a EU format. " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Just checked, mine says "Her Britannic Majesty of Great Britain and Northern Ireland" Funny mine clearly says "EUROPEAN UNION UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND" Yes; Do does mine And my French one says Union europeénne République francais Because that denotes that we are part of the EU; But the British passport is granted solely by the British government; by no-one else; So it is a British passport Not an EU passport; just in a EU format. " I'd rather not have "EUROPEAN UNION" on the front of my passport. I dont want to be part of the EUROPEAN UNION. I'd rather we leave and have those 2 words removed thanks. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'd rather not have "EUROPEAN UNION" on the front of my passport. I dont want to be part of the EUROPEAN UNION. I'd rather we leave and have those 2 words removed thanks. " it could say "the queen's a rancid shit-sack" in massive letters on it ..... so long as it lets me travel abroad who fucking cares anyway .... apart from faridges army of lobotomised baboons obviously | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Just checked, mine says "Her Britannic Majesty of Great Britain and Northern Ireland" Funny mine clearly says "EUROPEAN UNION UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND" Yes; Do does mine And my French one says Union europeénne République francais Because that denotes that we are part of the EU; But the British passport is granted solely by the British government; by no-one else; So it is a British passport Not an EU passport; just in a EU format. I'd rather not have "EUROPEAN UNION" on the front of my passport. I dont want to be part of the EUROPEAN UNION. I'd rather we leave and have those 2 words removed thanks. " I'd rather not have "Her Britannic Majesty" on mine, but I'm not gonna cry about it | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"if you are on the electoral roll in this country then you get a vote" Incorrect. EU citizens, with the exception of citizens from Ireland, Malta & Cyprus, are not allowed to vote in national elections and this referendum is being run using the general election electoral role. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Commonwealth migrants from 54 states - including Australia, Canada, India, Pakistan and Nigeria - can join the electoral rolland vote in the EU referendum as long are they are residents in the UK. Unlike the general election, Commonwealth citizens in Gibraltar are also eligible to vote in the EU referendum Citizens from other European countries - apart from Ireland, Malta and Cyprus - will not get a vote on whether the UK remains part of the EU So how do you think these EU citizens living here will vote ?" They won't because they are not allowed to. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"In order to get as many remain votes as possible the EU Referendum allows UK Nationals who are living in the EU a vote. " you mean those pesky ex-pats........ why let the coffin dodgers out in spain, portugal, greece, ect vote..... p.s damn i am being facetious again..... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"In order to get as many remain votes as possible the EU Referendum allows UK Nationals who are living in the EU a vote. Unlike the Scottish Referendum where the voters had to live in Scotland to get a vote. Just another subtle way to rig the result" True, they will vote stay, so they can continue to spend their revenue propping up EU countries, whist sticking their finger up at UK but still voting | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"In order to get as many remain votes as possible the EU Referendum allows UK Nationals who are living in the EU a vote. Unlike the Scottish Referendum where the voters had to live in Scotland to get a vote. Just another subtle way to rig the result" UK nationals living abroad can only vote in the referendum if they have been on the UK electoral register in the past fifteen years. Citizens from Malta, Cyprus and Ireland can also vote. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Just checked, mine says "Her Britannic Majesty of Great Britain and Northern Ireland" Funny mine clearly says "EUROPEAN UNION UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND" Yes; Do does mine And my French one says Union europeénne République francais Because that denotes that we are part of the EU; But the British passport is granted solely by the British government; by no-one else; So it is a British passport Not an EU passport; just in a EU format. I'd rather not have "EUROPEAN UNION" on the front of my passport. I dont want to be part of the EUROPEAN UNION. I'd rather we leave and have those 2 words removed thanks. " You really don't need it to holiday in Weymouth. Just pop the offending document in a shredder. Problem fixed. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"In order to get as many remain votes as possible the EU Referendum allows UK Nationals who are living in the EU a vote. Unlike the Scottish Referendum where the voters had to live in Scotland to get a vote. Just another subtle way to rig the result True, they will vote stay, so they can continue to spend their revenue propping up EU countries, whist sticking their finger up at UK but still voting" And also most/ many still have to pay tax in UK: "no taxation without representation". Quite apart from those of us who generate income for the UK as well as our country of residence . | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"In order to get as many remain votes as possible the EU Referendum allows UK Nationals who are living in the EU a vote. you mean those pesky ex-pats........ why let the coffin dodgers out in spain, portugal, greece, ect vote..... p.s damn i am being facetious again....." Did you see the Sean Lock sketch at the comedy gala about this. Was in jest but he had a point. No one over 60 to vote simply because it won't effect their 'futures' unlike the younger generation. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"In order to get as many remain votes as possible the EU Referendum allows UK Nationals who are living in the EU a vote. you mean those pesky ex-pats........ why let the coffin dodgers out in spain, portugal, greece, ect vote..... p.s damn i am being facetious again..... Did you see the Sean Lock sketch at the comedy gala about this. Was in jest but he had a point. No one over 60 to vote simply because it won't effect their 'futures' unlike the younger generation. " Some people actually believe that sort of thing is a good idea ; - forgetting that 1. at 60 I have at least 30 years of "future" 2. That. 60 + year old still pays taxes ( again, "no taxation without representation") 3. That 60+ year olds have money to use and invest , which affects the economy, 4. That they are entitled to have a say in how the government does its business as it affects them ( and their families ) | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"On that basis the very young have the longest future and should also be entitled to vote. " I do think 16 years should be able too, they did in Scotland. It is more their future than those who have already messed it all up once. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"On that basis the very young have the longest future and should also be entitled to vote. I do think 16 years should be able too, they did in Scotland. It is more their future than those who have already messed it all up once. " 16 is far too young; they have absolutely no understanding of the big picture; and little sense of responsibility. Mind you, a high proportion of 30 year olds don't have the faintest idea of what goes on in the world around them either. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"On that basis the very young have the longest future and should also be entitled to vote. I do think 16 years should be able too, they did in Scotland. It is more their future than those who have already messed it all up once. 16 is far too young; they have absolutely no understanding of the big picture; and little sense of responsibility. Mind you, a high proportion of 30 year olds don't have the faintest idea of what goes on in the world around them either." How incredibly short sighted and ageist of you. Plenty also do know, at 16 I had a healthy interest in politics while working a full time job and studying. If I can do all that I can make a decision about MY future at that age too. Let's also not forget plenty in their 40's, 50's and 60's don't either. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Think its was meant as people who are entitled to a uk passport not just the ones actually in possession of one Slaps hand in face muttering FFS That is what we meant There are quite a lot of people in UK ( and outside ) the UK who are entitled to ( and hold) a UK passport, but who are not British citizens and are not entitled to vote." Huh? I don't understand, only British citizens can hold a British Passport. How can you have a UK passport and not be a British citizen? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Just checked, mine says "Her Britannic Majesty of Great Britain and Northern Ireland" Funny mine clearly says "EUROPEAN UNION UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND" Yes; Do does mine And my French one says Union europeénne République francais Because that denotes that we are part of the EU; But the British passport is granted solely by the British government; by no-one else; So it is a British passport Not an EU passport; just in a EU format. " This is like people saying "we're going to have an EU army" well show me the EU Army recruiting office then, because Im pretty sure we are only going to have a British army, which is going to work alongside our allies from Europe and the rest of the world, like we have been doing for hundreds of years. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Going to say something potentially controversial here: But am I the only one who thinks that if an EU citizen has been living here permanently for 5 years, and has the documents to show that they have been paid here, and have been paying all of their taxes here, then they should be allowed to vote? I have a Dutch friend here who has been living in the UK for the past 6 years, who only ever leaves Britain to see family at Christmas and for family events, pays all of her tax here and in terms of being a 'drain on resources' she's never had benefits other than using the NHS. She's miffed that she can't vote, and I'm miffed for her. I mean we have British citizens who dodge tax and exploit the welfare system who can vote, why can't a hard working person from a different nation?" Not controversial at all. This type of person should get more say in this country than someone who was born here and never worked a day in their life. That is after all how this country was built, on hard working immigrants! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"To quote Muhammad Ali- "A man who's views are the same at 50 as they were when he was 20, has wasted 30 years of his life". Upper age should be no barrier " Completely agree, however a person should be open to ensuring their views are well informed or allowing them to be challenged. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Going to say something potentially controversial here: But am I the only one who thinks that if an EU citizen has been living here permanently for 5 years, and has the documents to show that they have been paid here, and have been paying all of their taxes here, then they should be allowed to vote? I have a Dutch friend here who has been living in the UK for the past 6 years, who only ever leaves Britain to see family at Christmas and for family events, pays all of her tax here and in terms of being a 'drain on resources' she's never had benefits other than using the NHS. She's miffed that she can't vote, and I'm miffed for her. I mean we have British citizens who dodge tax and exploit the welfare system who can vote, why can't a hard working person from a different nation?" No; why should they? Only citizens of a country can vote in national elections; if she wants to vote in UK national elections; then she can take British Nationality. She may already vote in Local and EU elections. It's the same everywhere; as I live in France, I have taken French Nationality ( so I have dual nationality) and do that I can vote in Nationsl elections in France. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Going to say something potentially controversial here: But am I the only one who thinks that if an EU citizen has been living here permanently for 5 years, and has the documents to show that they have been paid here, and have been paying all of their taxes here, then they should be allowed to vote? I have a Dutch friend here who has been living in the UK for the past 6 years, who only ever leaves Britain to see family at Christmas and for family events, pays all of her tax here and in terms of being a 'drain on resources' she's never had benefits other than using the NHS. She's miffed that she can't vote, and I'm miffed for her. I mean we have British citizens who dodge tax and exploit the welfare system who can vote, why can't a hard working person from a different nation? No; why should they? Only citizens of a country can vote in national elections; if she wants to vote in UK national elections; then she can take British Nationality. She may already vote in Local and EU elections. It's the same everywhere; as I live in France, I have taken French Nationality ( so I have dual nationality) and do that I can vote in Nationsl elections in France." Thank you for informing me of that. It actually never twigged to me that this was an option. Still though, I actually think that the system is too ridged in this case - life is pretty hectic and lets face it, you don't see leaflets been handed out advertising dual nationality. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Commonwealth migrants from 54 states - including Australia, Canada, India, Pakistan and Nigeria - can join the electoral rolland vote in the EU referendum as long are they are residents in the UK. Unlike the general election, Commonwealth citizens in Gibraltar are also eligible to vote in the EU referendum Citizens from other European countries - apart from Ireland, Malta and Cyprus - will not get a vote on whether the UK remains part of the EU So how do you think these EU citizens living here will vote ? Do you mean which way will they vote?Yes ? I'd be camped in the betting shop if I knew that! I'm guessing they would want us to remain.This is our opinion no UK passport = no vote " Really? I am Irish and have an Irish passport and I am eligible to vote. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Think its was meant as people who are entitled to a uk passport not just the ones actually in possession of one Slaps hand in face muttering FFS That is what we meant There are quite a lot of people in UK ( and outside ) the UK who are entitled to ( and hold) a UK passport, but who are not British citizens and are not entitled to vote. Huh? I don't understand, only British citizens can hold a British Passport. How can you have a UK passport and not be a British citizen? " You can be: British Citizen British Overseas Territiries Citizen British Overseas Citizen British Subject British National British Protected Person All of which are different; but all can hold a British passport. Not all can vote in UK. Not all passport holders have permanent right of abode in UK either , but all can enter and leave at will with no visa. And some Citizens are denied vote if they have lived outside UK for over 15 years. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Think its was meant as people who are entitled to a uk passport not just the ones actually in possession of one Slaps hand in face muttering FFS That is what we meant There are quite a lot of people in UK ( and outside ) the UK who are entitled to ( and hold) a UK passport, but who are not British citizens and are not entitled to vote. Huh? I don't understand, only British citizens can hold a British Passport. How can you have a UK passport and not be a British citizen? " You can have a British Overseas Territories passport. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Going to say something potentially controversial here: But am I the only one who thinks that if an EU citizen has been living here permanently for 5 years, and has the documents to show that they have been paid here, and have been paying all of their taxes here, then they should be allowed to vote? I have a Dutch friend here who has been living in the UK for the past 6 years, who only ever leaves Britain to see family at Christmas and for family events, pays all of her tax here and in terms of being a 'drain on resources' she's never had benefits other than using the NHS. She's miffed that she can't vote, and I'm miffed for her. I mean we have British citizens who dodge tax and exploit the welfare system who can vote, why can't a hard working person from a different nation?" I personally think she should be allowed to vote. I think it would have been better if the local council electoral role had been used, which would have allowed EU citizens habitually resident here to vote also. However I don't feel so strongly about it that I'm willing to make an issue of it. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Commonwealth migrants from 54 states - including Australia, Canada, India, Pakistan and Nigeria - can join the electoral rolland vote in the EU referendum as long are they are residents in the UK. Unlike the general election, Commonwealth citizens in Gibraltar are also eligible to vote in the EU referendum Citizens from other European countries - apart from Ireland, Malta and Cyprus - will not get a vote on whether the UK remains part of the EU So how do you think these EU citizens living here will vote ? Do you mean which way will they vote?Yes ? I'd be camped in the betting shop if I knew that! I'm guessing they would want us to remain.This is our opinion no UK passport = no vote Really? I am Irish and have an Irish passport and I am eligible to vote." Irish, Maltese and Cypriot citizens can vote in all UK elections if they are habitually resident in the UK. This is due to historical legislation related to the fact that they are all former British territories. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"On that basis the very young have the longest future and should also be entitled to vote. I do think 16 years should be able too, they did in Scotland. It is more their future than those who have already messed it all up once. 16 is far too young; they have absolutely no understanding of the big picture; and little sense of responsibility. Mind you, a high proportion of 30 year olds don't have the faintest idea of what goes on in the world around them either." What absolute bollocks!!!! Our 10 year old saw a bit on the news and asked me what it was about as they mentioned a war. I explained in my best 'Devils Advocate' manner the pros and cons (in a slightly simplified way) as I see it. He thought for a minute and then said he'd vote 'remain' while I'm undecided but leaning towards leave. They might be children in your eyes but a lot of them are far from stupid and this vote will effect them a lot more and for a lot longer than most of us forumites. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Commonwealth migrants from 54 states - including Australia, Canada, India, Pakistan and Nigeria - can join the electoral rolland vote in the EU referendum as long are they are residents in the UK. Unlike the general election, Commonwealth citizens in Gibraltar are also eligible to vote in the EU referendum Citizens from other European countries - apart from Ireland, Malta and Cyprus - will not get a vote on whether the UK remains part of the EU So how do you think these EU citizens living here will vote ? Do you mean which way will they vote?Yes ? I'd be camped in the betting shop if I knew that! I'm guessing they would want us to remain.This is our opinion no UK passport = no vote Really? I am Irish and have an Irish passport and I am eligible to vote. Irish, Maltese and Cypriot citizens can vote in all UK elections if they are habitually resident in the UK. This is due to historical legislation related to the fact that they are all former British territories." Yes, I know. Thank you for explaining though. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" I personally think she should be allowed to vote. I think it would have been better if the local council electoral role had been used, which would have allowed EU citizens habitually resident here to vote also. However I don't feel so strongly about it that I'm willing to make an issue of it. " Absolutely not. This is a British issue and only British people should decide on whether the UK remains in the EU or not. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"On that basis the very young have the longest future and should also be entitled to vote. I do think 16 years should be able too, they did in Scotland. It is more their future than those who have already messed it all up once. 16 is far too young; they have absolutely no understanding of the big picture; and little sense of responsibility. Mind you, a high proportion of 30 year olds don't have the faintest idea of what goes on in the world around them either. What absolute bollocks!!!! Our 10 year old saw a bit on the news and asked me what it was about as they mentioned a war. I explained in my best 'Devils Advocate' manner the pros and cons (in a slightly simplified way) as I see it. He thought for a minute and then said he'd vote 'remain' while I'm undecided but leaning towards leave. They might be children in your eyes but a lot of them are far from stupid and this vote will effect them a lot more and for a lot longer than most of us forumites." I agree, a lot of younger people seem to know a lot about this subject. However I don't think it would have been right to lower the age limit for this referendum. Even with no charges to the rules many are claiming that the government is trying to gerrymander the role to get the result it wants, especially those from BREXIT. I think it's probably best to stick with the rules we normally use. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" I personally think she should be allowed to vote. I think it would have been better if the local council electoral role had been used, which would have allowed EU citizens habitually resident here to vote also. However I don't feel so strongly about it that I'm willing to make an issue of it. Absolutely not. This is a British issue and only British people should decide on whether the UK remains in the EU or not." Local shop for local people! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" I personally think she should be allowed to vote. I think it would have been better if the local council electoral role had been used, which would have allowed EU citizens habitually resident here to vote also. However I don't feel so strongly about it that I'm willing to make an issue of it. Absolutely not. This is a British issue and only British people should decide on whether the UK remains in the EU or not." Are saying people born here, or ancestrally 'British', and excluding EU citizens who take up British citizenship. Because I'm only British due to being born here - ancestrally I'm a mixed European. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" I personally think she should be allowed to vote. I think it would have been better if the local council electoral role had been used, which would have allowed EU citizens habitually resident here to vote also. However I don't feel so strongly about it that I'm willing to make an issue of it. Absolutely not. This is a British issue and only British people should decide on whether the UK remains in the EU or not." Well it doesn't really matter because the decision has been made to use the General Election role and rules, which means they can't vote, so save your angst for something that actually matters. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"On that basis the very young have the longest future and should also be entitled to vote. I do think 16 years should be able too, they did in Scotland. It is more their future than those who have already messed it all up once. 16 is far too young; they have absolutely no understanding of the big picture; and little sense of responsibility. Mind you, a high proportion of 30 year olds don't have the faintest idea of what goes on in the world around them either. What absolute bollocks!!!! Our 10 year old saw a bit on the news and asked me what it was about as they mentioned a war. I explained in my best 'Devils Advocate' manner the pros and cons (in a slightly simplified way) as I see it. He thought for a minute and then said he'd vote 'remain' while I'm undecided but leaning towards leave. They might be children in your eyes but a lot of them are far from stupid and this vote will effect them a lot more and for a lot longer than most of us forumites. I agree, a lot of younger people seem to know a lot about this subject. However I don't think it would have been right to lower the age limit for this referendum. Even with no charges to the rules many are claiming that the government is trying to gerrymander the role to get the result it wants, especially those from BREXIT. I think it's probably best to stick with the rules we normally use." My younger cousin is 17, she studies politics and sciences and is currently looking at uni choices. She is angry at not being able to vote as she feels well informed and also because she was looking at using the EU as a way to access cheaper uni education in Denmark, Germany, Sweden ect. What I am trying to say is by narrowing it to 18 not 16, a lot of young people, especially those looking at university feel as though their future is being narrowed. She admits that cheaper uni fees would not be enough to persuade her to vote remain, but as a direct impact on her future, it would be a factor. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"British in the broad application of the word. Born or naturalised, if you're British you should be able to vote. Foreigners can go home the day after the referendum if they so wish and on that basis they should not be allowed to vote on such an important issue." On that basis British people would not be allowed to vote either because, the day after the referendum, we will still be in the EU, and will remain in the EU for at least two years whatever way the vote goes, so British people could also leave to go and live in the EU. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"On that basis the very young have the longest future and should also be entitled to vote. I do think 16 years should be able too, they did in Scotland. It is more their future than those who have already messed it all up once. 16 is far too young; they have absolutely no understanding of the big picture; and little sense of responsibility. Mind you, a high proportion of 30 year olds don't have the faintest idea of what goes on in the world around them either. What absolute bollocks!!!! Our 10 year old saw a bit on the news and asked me what it was about as they mentioned a war. I explained in my best 'Devils Advocate' manner the pros and cons (in a slightly simplified way) as I see it. He thought for a minute and then said he'd vote 'remain' while I'm undecided but leaning towards leave. They might be children in your eyes but a lot of them are far from stupid and this vote will effect them a lot more and for a lot longer than most of us forumites. I agree, a lot of younger people seem to know a lot about this subject. However I don't think it would have been right to lower the age limit for this referendum. Even with no charges to the rules many are claiming that the government is trying to gerrymander the role to get the result it wants, especially those from BREXIT. I think it's probably best to stick with the rules we normally use. My younger cousin is 17, she studies politics and sciences and is currently looking at uni choices. She is angry at not being able to vote as she feels well informed and also because she was looking at using the EU as a way to access cheaper uni education in Denmark, Germany, Sweden ect. What I am trying to say is by narrowing it to 18 not 16, a lot of young people, especially those looking at university feel as though their future is being narrowed. She admits that cheaper uni fees would not be enough to persuade her to vote remain, but as a direct impact on her future, it would be a factor." Well no one is actually narrowing it. They're just not widening it either. But I know how she feels, I was 16 at the last EEC referendum and felt pretty much the same as she. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"British in the broad application of the word. Born or naturalised, if you're British you should be able to vote. Foreigners can go home the day after the referendum if they so wish and on that basis they should not be allowed to vote on such an important issue." Yes let's send them all home and lose nearly 15% of the NHS staff while we do and watch it collapse as the already incredibly understaffed service breaks down even more. Genius. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"On that basis the very young have the longest future and should also be entitled to vote. I do think 16 years should be able too, they did in Scotland. It is more their future than those who have already messed it all up once. 16 is far too young; they have absolutely no understanding of the big picture; and little sense of responsibility. Mind you, a high proportion of 30 year olds don't have the faintest idea of what goes on in the world around them either. What absolute bollocks!!!! Our 10 year old saw a bit on the news and asked me what it was about as they mentioned a war. I explained in my best 'Devils Advocate' manner the pros and cons (in a slightly simplified way) as I see it. He thought for a minute and then said he'd vote 'remain' while I'm undecided but leaning towards leave. They might be children in your eyes but a lot of them are far from stupid and this vote will effect them a lot more and for a lot longer than most of us forumites. I agree, a lot of younger people seem to know a lot about this subject. However I don't think it would have been right to lower the age limit for this referendum. Even with no charges to the rules many are claiming that the government is trying to gerrymander the role to get the result it wants, especially those from BREXIT. I think it's probably best to stick with the rules we normally use. My younger cousin is 17, she studies politics and sciences and is currently looking at uni choices. She is angry at not being able to vote as she feels well informed and also because she was looking at using the EU as a way to access cheaper uni education in Denmark, Germany, Sweden ect. What I am trying to say is by narrowing it to 18 not 16, a lot of young people, especially those looking at university feel as though their future is being narrowed. She admits that cheaper uni fees would not be enough to persuade her to vote remain, but as a direct impact on her future, it would be a factor. Well no one is actually narrowing it. They're just not widening it either. But I know how she feels, I was 16 at the last EEC referendum and felt pretty much the same as she." In regards to her future in education it is being narrowed. It is far easier to apply to study in another EU country as a EU citizen - plus, fee prices would have to be negotiated outside the EU. I don't know if they would go up - however it shouldn't be ruled out, then there is the matter of health and insurance. Lets put it this way, I sat down with her to do the maths and it works out cheaper in the long run, and possibly over the course of her studies to study, say in the Netherlands or Germany. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"On that basis the very young have the longest future and should also be entitled to vote. I do think 16 years should be able too, they did in Scotland. It is more their future than those who have already messed it all up once. 16 is far too young; they have absolutely no understanding of the big picture; and little sense of responsibility. Mind you, a high proportion of 30 year olds don't have the faintest idea of what goes on in the world around them either. What absolute bollocks!!!! Our 10 year old saw a bit on the news and asked me what it was about as they mentioned a war. I explained in my best 'Devils Advocate' manner the pros and cons (in a slightly simplified way) as I see it. He thought for a minute and then said he'd vote 'remain' while I'm undecided but leaning towards leave. They might be children in your eyes but a lot of them are far from stupid and this vote will effect them a lot more and for a lot longer than most of us forumites. I agree, a lot of younger people seem to know a lot about this subject. However I don't think it would have been right to lower the age limit for this referendum. Even with no charges to the rules many are claiming that the government is trying to gerrymander the role to get the result it wants, especially those from BREXIT. I think it's probably best to stick with the rules we normally use. My younger cousin is 17, she studies politics and sciences and is currently looking at uni choices. She is angry at not being able to vote as she feels well informed and also because she was looking at using the EU as a way to access cheaper uni education in Denmark, Germany, Sweden ect. What I am trying to say is by narrowing it to 18 not 16, a lot of young people, especially those looking at university feel as though their future is being narrowed. She admits that cheaper uni fees would not be enough to persuade her to vote remain, but as a direct impact on her future, it would be a factor." Maybe if we were out of the EU university fees would be cheaper when you consider that over the last 5 years EU graduates have left owing over £50 million in unpaid fees and it rises every year and apparently the authorities are unable to track them down. What did she think of that? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"On that basis the very young have the longest future and should also be entitled to vote. I do think 16 years should be able too, they did in Scotland. It is more their future than those who have already messed it all up once. 16 is far too young; they have absolutely no understanding of the big picture; and little sense of responsibility. Mind you, a high proportion of 30 year olds don't have the faintest idea of what goes on in the world around them either. What absolute bollocks!!!! Our 10 year old saw a bit on the news and asked me what it was about as they mentioned a war. I explained in my best 'Devils Advocate' manner the pros and cons (in a slightly simplified way) as I see it. He thought for a minute and then said he'd vote 'remain' while I'm undecided but leaning towards leave. They might be children in your eyes but a lot of them are far from stupid and this vote will effect them a lot more and for a lot longer than most of us forumites. I agree, a lot of younger people seem to know a lot about this subject. However I don't think it would have been right to lower the age limit for this referendum. Even with no charges to the rules many are claiming that the government is trying to gerrymander the role to get the result it wants, especially those from BREXIT. I think it's probably best to stick with the rules we normally use. My younger cousin is 17, she studies politics and sciences and is currently looking at uni choices. She is angry at not being able to vote as she feels well informed and also because she was looking at using the EU as a way to access cheaper uni education in Denmark, Germany, Sweden ect. What I am trying to say is by narrowing it to 18 not 16, a lot of young people, especially those looking at university feel as though their future is being narrowed. She admits that cheaper uni fees would not be enough to persuade her to vote remain, but as a direct impact on her future, it would be a factor. Maybe if we were out of the EU university fees would be cheaper when you consider that over the last 5 years EU graduates have left owing over £50 million in unpaid fees and it rises every year and apparently the authorities are unable to track them down. What did she think of that?" They wouldn't no. Since it was the British government who gave the British unis free reign to set what they want. Has nothing to do with unpaid fees or the EU and all to do with tories money grabbing. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"On that basis the very young have the longest future and should also be entitled to vote. I do think 16 years should be able too, they did in Scotland. It is more their future than those who have already messed it all up once. 16 is far too young; they have absolutely no understanding of the big picture; and little sense of responsibility. Mind you, a high proportion of 30 year olds don't have the faintest idea of what goes on in the world around them either. What absolute bollocks!!!! Our 10 year old saw a bit on the news and asked me what it was about as they mentioned a war. I explained in my best 'Devils Advocate' manner the pros and cons (in a slightly simplified way) as I see it. He thought for a minute and then said he'd vote 'remain' while I'm undecided but leaning towards leave. They might be children in your eyes but a lot of them are far from stupid and this vote will effect them a lot more and for a lot longer than most of us forumites. I agree, a lot of younger people seem to know a lot about this subject. However I don't think it would have been right to lower the age limit for this referendum. Even with no charges to the rules many are claiming that the government is trying to gerrymander the role to get the result it wants, especially those from BREXIT. I think it's probably best to stick with the rules we normally use. My younger cousin is 17, she studies politics and sciences and is currently looking at uni choices. She is angry at not being able to vote as she feels well informed and also because she was looking at using the EU as a way to access cheaper uni education in Denmark, Germany, Sweden ect. What I am trying to say is by narrowing it to 18 not 16, a lot of young people, especially those looking at university feel as though their future is being narrowed. She admits that cheaper uni fees would not be enough to persuade her to vote remain, but as a direct impact on her future, it would be a factor. Maybe if we were out of the EU university fees would be cheaper when you consider that over the last 5 years EU graduates have left owing over £50 million in unpaid fees and it rises every year and apparently the authorities are unable to track them down. What did she think of that?" I'd like to know where the information on EU graduates not paying their fees back came from - most of the EU students I know pay their fees back, or had their study covered by their country or employer. Also no, the fees wouldn't go down, not unless you got someone who sincerely believes in education being free or easily accessible. As the last few years have shown, our university system has just become a way of signing young people up to large amounts of debt. The doctor I work under basically feels as though universities and students are being milked for cash by Westminster and are not truly valued. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think you'll find it was a Labour government who introduced uni fees in 1998." Yes we know, the Tories hammer on about it whenever the issue comes up. However, that amount of money set then was reasonable, student maintenance loans and bursaries were at a all time high. The Tories have basically allowed university bureaucracy and investors to self regulate tuition prices - lets face it, that will not work out well for ordinary people. Then lets not forget that under the Tories the reasonable tuition fee price nearly trebled, maintenance loans and bursaries were cut drastically - and Cameron went back on his promise that the price at which fees will be required to be paid back would not go below £21,000 I believe, at least he was toying with that idea. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I think you'll find it was a Labour government who introduced uni fees in 1998." And I think you will find they capped them so the average person could afford them. Who removed the low cap to make them less accessible to the lower income family?? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"On that basis the very young have the longest future and should also be entitled to vote. I do think 16 years should be able too, they did in Scotland. It is more their future than those who have already messed it all up once. 16 is far too young; they have absolutely no understanding of the big picture; and little sense of responsibility. Mind you, a high proportion of 30 year olds don't have the faintest idea of what goes on in the world around them either. What absolute bollocks!!!! Our 10 year old saw a bit on the news and asked me what it was about as they mentioned a war. I explained in my best 'Devils Advocate' manner the pros and cons (in a slightly simplified way) as I see it. He thought for a minute and then said he'd vote 'remain' while I'm undecided but leaning towards leave. They might be children in your eyes but a lot of them are far from stupid and this vote will effect them a lot more and for a lot longer than most of us forumites. I agree, a lot of younger people seem to know a lot about this subject. However I don't think it would have been right to lower the age limit for this referendum. Even with no charges to the rules many are claiming that the government is trying to gerrymander the role to get the result it wants, especially those from BREXIT. I think it's probably best to stick with the rules we normally use. My younger cousin is 17, she studies politics and sciences and is currently looking at uni choices. She is angry at not being able to vote as she feels well informed and also because she was looking at using the EU as a way to access cheaper uni education in Denmark, Germany, Sweden ect. What I am trying to say is by narrowing it to 18 not 16, a lot of young people, especially those looking at university feel as though their future is being narrowed. She admits that cheaper uni fees would not be enough to persuade her to vote remain, but as a direct impact on her future, it would be a factor. Maybe if we were out of the EU university fees would be cheaper when you consider that over the last 5 years EU graduates have left owing over £50 million in unpaid fees and it rises every year and apparently the authorities are unable to track them down. What did she think of that? I'd like to know where the information on EU graduates not paying their fees back came from - most of the EU students I know pay their fees back, or had their study covered by their country or employer. Also no, the fees wouldn't go down, not unless you got someone who sincerely believes in education being free or easily accessible. As the last few years have shown, our university system has just become a way of signing young people up to large amounts of debt. The doctor I work under basically feels as though universities and students are being milked for cash by Westminster and are not truly valued." from the Students Loan Company and has been reported in several papers left and right and on the BBC. My figures might have been wrong though, think its more like £98 million now | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"A 4-year degree course costs a lot more than £1k to run and there's nothing to stop a post degree grad leaving the UK once we've paid for his or her course. Even now they cash still leave the UK and not repay their loans but for those who stay it is right to expect them to pay for their advanced education." No there isn't, but a quick but of research shows most stay on in the UK thus contributing to our economy, this includes international students (otherwise known as immigrants) who make up for our short fall in doctors, engineers and scientists. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"On that basis the very young have the longest future and should also be entitled to vote. I do think 16 years should be able too, they did in Scotland. It is more their future than those who have already messed it all up once. 16 is far too young; they have absolutely no understanding of the big picture; and little sense of responsibility. Mind you, a high proportion of 30 year olds don't have the faintest idea of what goes on in the world around them either. What absolute bollocks!!!! Our 10 year old saw a bit on the news and asked me what it was about as they mentioned a war. I explained in my best 'Devils Advocate' manner the pros and cons (in a slightly simplified way) as I see it. He thought for a minute and then said he'd vote 'remain' while I'm undecided but leaning towards leave. They might be children in your eyes but a lot of them are far from stupid and this vote will effect them a lot more and for a lot longer than most of us forumites. I agree, a lot of younger people seem to know a lot about this subject. However I don't think it would have been right to lower the age limit for this referendum. Even with no charges to the rules many are claiming that the government is trying to gerrymander the role to get the result it wants, especially those from BREXIT. I think it's probably best to stick with the rules we normally use. My younger cousin is 17, she studies politics and sciences and is currently looking at uni choices. She is angry at not being able to vote as she feels well informed and also because she was looking at using the EU as a way to access cheaper uni education in Denmark, Germany, Sweden ect. What I am trying to say is by narrowing it to 18 not 16, a lot of young people, especially those looking at university feel as though their future is being narrowed. She admits that cheaper uni fees would not be enough to persuade her to vote remain, but as a direct impact on her future, it would be a factor. Maybe if we were out of the EU university fees would be cheaper when you consider that over the last 5 years EU graduates have left owing over £50 million in unpaid fees and it rises every year and apparently the authorities are unable to track them down. What did she think of that? I'd like to know where the information on EU graduates not paying their fees back came from - most of the EU students I know pay their fees back, or had their study covered by their country or employer. Also no, the fees wouldn't go down, not unless you got someone who sincerely believes in education being free or easily accessible. As the last few years have shown, our university system has just become a way of signing young people up to large amounts of debt. The doctor I work under basically feels as though universities and students are being milked for cash by Westminster and are not truly valued. from the Students Loan Company and has been reported in several papers left and right and on the BBC. My figures might have been wrong though, think its more like £98 million now" So that's about half a million per University in the UK which in the grand scheme of things is a drop in the ocean to most major universities. We deal with one very large University who have to forcefully spend around £2 million on estates just to make sure they don't lose the funding, this is usually vanity projects and can be done without. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"On that basis the very young have the longest future and should also be entitled to vote. I do think 16 years should be able too, they did in Scotland. It is more their future than those who have already messed it all up once. 16 is far too young; they have absolutely no understanding of the big picture; and little sense of responsibility. Mind you, a high proportion of 30 year olds don't have the faintest idea of what goes on in the world around them either. What absolute bollocks!!!! Our 10 year old saw a bit on the news and asked me what it was about as they mentioned a war. I explained in my best 'Devils Advocate' manner the pros and cons (in a slightly simplified way) as I see it. He thought for a minute and then said he'd vote 'remain' while I'm undecided but leaning towards leave. They might be children in your eyes but a lot of them are far from stupid and this vote will effect them a lot more and for a lot longer than most of us forumites. I agree, a lot of younger people seem to know a lot about this subject. However I don't think it would have been right to lower the age limit for this referendum. Even with no charges to the rules many are claiming that the government is trying to gerrymander the role to get the result it wants, especially those from BREXIT. I think it's probably best to stick with the rules we normally use. My younger cousin is 17, she studies politics and sciences and is currently looking at uni choices. She is angry at not being able to vote as she feels well informed and also because she was looking at using the EU as a way to access cheaper uni education in Denmark, Germany, Sweden ect. What I am trying to say is by narrowing it to 18 not 16, a lot of young people, especially those looking at university feel as though their future is being narrowed. She admits that cheaper uni fees would not be enough to persuade her to vote remain, but as a direct impact on her future, it would be a factor. Maybe if we were out of the EU university fees would be cheaper when you consider that over the last 5 years EU graduates have left owing over £50 million in unpaid fees and it rises every year and apparently the authorities are unable to track them down. What did she think of that? I'd like to know where the information on EU graduates not paying their fees back came from - most of the EU students I know pay their fees back, or had their study covered by their country or employer. Also no, the fees wouldn't go down, not unless you got someone who sincerely believes in education being free or easily accessible. As the last few years have shown, our university system has just become a way of signing young people up to large amounts of debt. The doctor I work under basically feels as though universities and students are being milked for cash by Westminster and are not truly valued. from the Students Loan Company and has been reported in several papers left and right and on the BBC. My figures might have been wrong though, think its more like £98 million now" Well I would love it if you could find that student loans company report for me as I am not having much luck. You know, the actual report not a media outlet reporting on it. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"On that basis the very young have the longest future and should also be entitled to vote. I do think 16 years should be able too, they did in Scotland. It is more their future than those who have already messed it all up once. 16 is far too young; they have absolutely no understanding of the big picture; and little sense of responsibility. Mind you, a high proportion of 30 year olds don't have the faintest idea of what goes on in the world around them either. What absolute bollocks!!!! Our 10 year old saw a bit on the news and asked me what it was about as they mentioned a war. I explained in my best 'Devils Advocate' manner the pros and cons (in a slightly simplified way) as I see it. He thought for a minute and then said he'd vote 'remain' while I'm undecided but leaning towards leave. They might be children in your eyes but a lot of them are far from stupid and this vote will effect them a lot more and for a lot longer than most of us forumites. I agree, a lot of younger people seem to know a lot about this subject. However I don't think it would have been right to lower the age limit for this referendum. Even with no charges to the rules many are claiming that the government is trying to gerrymander the role to get the result it wants, especially those from BREXIT. I think it's probably best to stick with the rules we normally use. My younger cousin is 17, she studies politics and sciences and is currently looking at uni choices. She is angry at not being able to vote as she feels well informed and also because she was looking at using the EU as a way to access cheaper uni education in Denmark, Germany, Sweden ect. What I am trying to say is by narrowing it to 18 not 16, a lot of young people, especially those looking at university feel as though their future is being narrowed. She admits that cheaper uni fees would not be enough to persuade her to vote remain, but as a direct impact on her future, it would be a factor. Maybe if we were out of the EU university fees would be cheaper when you consider that over the last 5 years EU graduates have left owing over £50 million in unpaid fees and it rises every year and apparently the authorities are unable to track them down. What did she think of that? I'd like to know where the information on EU graduates not paying their fees back came from - most of the EU students I know pay their fees back, or had their study covered by their country or employer. Also no, the fees wouldn't go down, not unless you got someone who sincerely believes in education being free or easily accessible. As the last few years have shown, our university system has just become a way of signing young people up to large amounts of debt. The doctor I work under basically feels as though universities and students are being milked for cash by Westminster and are not truly valued. from the Students Loan Company and has been reported in several papers left and right and on the BBC. My figures might have been wrong though, think its more like £98 million now So that's about half a million per University in the UK which in the grand scheme of things is a drop in the ocean to most major universities. We deal with one very large University who have to forcefully spend around £2 million on estates just to make sure they don't lose the funding, this is usually vanity projects and can be done without. " This ^ | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"A 4-year degree course costs a lot more than £1k to run and there's nothing to stop a post degree grad leaving the UK once we've paid for his or her course. Even now they cash still leave the UK and not repay their loans but for those who stay it is right to expect them to pay for their advanced education. No there isn't, but a quick but of research shows most stay on in the UK thus contributing to our economy, this includes international students (otherwise known as immigrants) who make up for our short fall in doctors, engineers and scientists. " There are actually a lot of mechanisms that allow the loans companies to bill a person for their fees overseas and in Europe. I've just been asking a few friends and they haven't started paying their fees back as their not earning enough. Effectively it's the same reason why student loans might not get paid back fully here, because young people are stuck in a wage freeze and not earning enough to meet the pay back requirements by the contract. If I were one day to move to Germany and get a poorly paid job there, the loans company can still track me down if they really want to. Same if I were to go to Australia. It's never hard to go off the radar. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"A 4-year degree course costs a lot more than £1k to run and there's nothing to stop a post degree grad leaving the UK once we've paid for his or her course. Even now they cash still leave the UK and not repay their loans but for those who stay it is right to expect them to pay for their advanced education. No there isn't, but a quick but of research shows most stay on in the UK thus contributing to our economy, this includes international students (otherwise known as immigrants) who make up for our short fall in doctors, engineers and scientists. " Making the case that they should get a free uni education because they'll be an asset to the uk is thin because they'll also earn a lot of money and pay tax accordingly. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"On that basis the very young have the longest future and should also be entitled to vote. I do think 16 years should be able too, they did in Scotland. It is more their future than those who have already messed it all up once. 16 is far too young; they have absolutely no understanding of the big picture; and little sense of responsibility. Mind you, a high proportion of 30 year olds don't have the faintest idea of what goes on in the world around them either. What absolute bollocks!!!! Our 10 year old saw a bit on the news and asked me what it was about as they mentioned a war. I explained in my best 'Devils Advocate' manner the pros and cons (in a slightly simplified way) as I see it. He thought for a minute and then said he'd vote 'remain' while I'm undecided but leaning towards leave. They might be children in your eyes but a lot of them are far from stupid and this vote will effect them a lot more and for a lot longer than most of us forumites. I agree, a lot of younger people seem to know a lot about this subject. However I don't think it would have been right to lower the age limit for this referendum. Even with no charges to the rules many are claiming that the government is trying to gerrymander the role to get the result it wants, especially those from BREXIT. I think it's probably best to stick with the rules we normally use. My younger cousin is 17, she studies politics and sciences and is currently looking at uni choices. She is angry at not being able to vote as she feels well informed and also because she was looking at using the EU as a way to access cheaper uni education in Denmark, Germany, Sweden ect. What I am trying to say is by narrowing it to 18 not 16, a lot of young people, especially those looking at university feel as though their future is being narrowed. She admits that cheaper uni fees would not be enough to persuade her to vote remain, but as a direct impact on her future, it would be a factor. Well no one is actually narrowing it. They're just not widening it either. But I know how she feels, I was 16 at the last EEC referendum and felt pretty much the same as she. In regards to her future in education it is being narrowed. It is far easier to apply to study in another EU country as a EU citizen - plus, fee prices would have to be negotiated outside the EU. I don't know if they would go up - however it shouldn't be ruled out, then there is the matter of health and insurance. Lets put it this way, I sat down with her to do the maths and it works out cheaper in the long run, and possibly over the course of her studies to study, say in the Netherlands or Germany." I was only talking about not narrowing or widening the criteria for being on the electoral role. I completely agree with you that leaving the EU would not only narrow her future in education but hers and everyone else's future opportunities in many ways. I'll be voting to stay in the EU. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"On that basis the very young have the longest future and should also be entitled to vote. I do think 16 years should be able too, they did in Scotland. It is more their future than those who have already messed it all up once. 16 is far too young; they have absolutely no understanding of the big picture; and little sense of responsibility. Mind you, a high proportion of 30 year olds don't have the faintest idea of what goes on in the world around them either. What absolute bollocks!!!! Our 10 year old saw a bit on the news and asked me what it was about as they mentioned a war. I explained in my best 'Devils Advocate' manner the pros and cons (in a slightly simplified way) as I see it. He thought for a minute and then said he'd vote 'remain' while I'm undecided but leaning towards leave. They might be children in your eyes but a lot of them are far from stupid and this vote will effect them a lot more and for a lot longer than most of us forumites. I agree, a lot of younger people seem to know a lot about this subject. However I don't think it would have been right to lower the age limit for this referendum. Even with no charges to the rules many are claiming that the government is trying to gerrymander the role to get the result it wants, especially those from BREXIT. I think it's probably best to stick with the rules we normally use. My younger cousin is 17, she studies politics and sciences and is currently looking at uni choices. She is angry at not being able to vote as she feels well informed and also because she was looking at using the EU as a way to access cheaper uni education in Denmark, Germany, Sweden ect. What I am trying to say is by narrowing it to 18 not 16, a lot of young people, especially those looking at university feel as though their future is being narrowed. She admits that cheaper uni fees would not be enough to persuade her to vote remain, but as a direct impact on her future, it would be a factor. Maybe if we were out of the EU university fees would be cheaper when you consider that over the last 5 years EU graduates have left owing over £50 million in unpaid fees and it rises every year and apparently the authorities are unable to track them down. What did she think of that? I'd like to know where the information on EU graduates not paying their fees back came from - most of the EU students I know pay their fees back, or had their study covered by their country or employer. Also no, the fees wouldn't go down, not unless you got someone who sincerely believes in education being free or easily accessible. As the last few years have shown, our university system has just become a way of signing young people up to large amounts of debt. The doctor I work under basically feels as though universities and students are being milked for cash by Westminster and are not truly valued. from the Students Loan Company and has been reported in several papers left and right and on the BBC. My figures might have been wrong though, think its more like £98 million now So that's about half a million per University in the UK which in the grand scheme of things is a drop in the ocean to most major universities. We deal with one very large University who have to forcefully spend around £2 million on estates just to make sure they don't lose the funding, this is usually vanity projects and can be done without. " you are missing the point. It is my tax. Where do you think the money comes from? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"On that basis the very young have the longest future and should also be entitled to vote. I do think 16 years should be able too, they did in Scotland. It is more their future than those who have already messed it all up once. 16 is far too young; they have absolutely no understanding of the big picture; and little sense of responsibility. Mind you, a high proportion of 30 year olds don't have the faintest idea of what goes on in the world around them either. What absolute bollocks!!!! Our 10 year old saw a bit on the news and asked me what it was about as they mentioned a war. I explained in my best 'Devils Advocate' manner the pros and cons (in a slightly simplified way) as I see it. He thought for a minute and then said he'd vote 'remain' while I'm undecided but leaning towards leave. They might be children in your eyes but a lot of them are far from stupid and this vote will effect them a lot more and for a lot longer than most of us forumites. I agree, a lot of younger people seem to know a lot about this subject. However I don't think it would have been right to lower the age limit for this referendum. Even with no charges to the rules many are claiming that the government is trying to gerrymander the role to get the result it wants, especially those from BREXIT. I think it's probably best to stick with the rules we normally use. My younger cousin is 17, she studies politics and sciences and is currently looking at uni choices. She is angry at not being able to vote as she feels well informed and also because she was looking at using the EU as a way to access cheaper uni education in Denmark, Germany, Sweden ect. What I am trying to say is by narrowing it to 18 not 16, a lot of young people, especially those looking at university feel as though their future is being narrowed. She admits that cheaper uni fees would not be enough to persuade her to vote remain, but as a direct impact on her future, it would be a factor. Maybe if we were out of the EU university fees would be cheaper when you consider that over the last 5 years EU graduates have left owing over £50 million in unpaid fees and it rises every year and apparently the authorities are unable to track them down. What did she think of that? I'd like to know where the information on EU graduates not paying their fees back came from - most of the EU students I know pay their fees back, or had their study covered by their country or employer. Also no, the fees wouldn't go down, not unless you got someone who sincerely believes in education being free or easily accessible. As the last few years have shown, our university system has just become a way of signing young people up to large amounts of debt. The doctor I work under basically feels as though universities and students are being milked for cash by Westminster and are not truly valued. from the Students Loan Company and has been reported in several papers left and right and on the BBC. My figures might have been wrong though, think its more like £98 million now Well I would love it if you could find that student loans company report for me as I am not having much luck. You know, the actual report not a media outlet reporting on it." you won't. Why would they advertise the fact that they can't do their job properly. It was obtained by the media under the freedom of information act | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Maybe if we were out of the EU university fees would be cheaper when you consider that over the last 5 years EU graduates have left owing over £50 million in unpaid fees and it rises every year and apparently the authorities are unable to track them down. What did she think of that? I'd like to know where the information on EU graduates not paying their fees back came from - most of the EU students I know pay their fees back, or had their study covered by their country or employer. Also no, the fees wouldn't go down, not unless you got someone who sincerely believes in education being free or easily accessible. As the last few years have shown, our university system has just become a way of signing young people up to large amounts of debt. The doctor I work under basically feels as though universities and students are being milked for cash by Westminster and are not truly valued. from the Students Loan Company and has been reported in several papers left and right and on the BBC. My figures might have been wrong though, think its more like £98 million now Well I would love it if you could find that student loans company report for me as I am not having much luck. You know, the actual report not a media outlet reporting on it. you won't. Why would they advertise the fact that they can't do their job properly. It was obtained by the media under the freedom of information act" What a load of twaddle. The underlying figures you quote were debunked in 2012. You can check that on full facts (search for fullfact.org and are-half-eu-students-failing-repay-their-loans). You don't need a freedom of information request to go to the student loans company web site and look up the official statistics page which fully supports what the full facts site says. You can also read the section on repayment by non UK EU national students that tells you they tend to repay student loans at a faster rate than UK nationals and repay earlier. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Maybe if we were out of the EU university fees would be cheaper when you consider that over the last 5 years EU graduates have left owing over £50 million in unpaid fees and it rises every year and apparently the authorities are unable to track them down. What did she think of that? I'd like to know where the information on EU graduates not paying their fees back came from - most of the EU students I know pay their fees back, or had their study covered by their country or employer. Also no, the fees wouldn't go down, not unless you got someone who sincerely believes in education being free or easily accessible. As the last few years have shown, our university system has just become a way of signing young people up to large amounts of debt. The doctor I work under basically feels as though universities and students are being milked for cash by Westminster and are not truly valued. from the Students Loan Company and has been reported in several papers left and right and on the BBC. My figures might have been wrong though, think its more like £98 million now Well I would love it if you could find that student loans company report for me as I am not having much luck. You know, the actual report not a media outlet reporting on it. you won't. Why would they advertise the fact that they can't do their job properly. It was obtained by the media under the freedom of information act What a load of twaddle. The underlying figures you quote were debunked in 2012. You can check that on full facts (search for fullfact.org and are-half-eu-students-failing-repay-their-loans). You don't need a freedom of information request to go to the student loans company web site and look up the official statistics page which fully supports what the full facts site says. You can also read the section on repayment by non UK EU national students that tells you they tend to repay student loans at a faster rate than UK nationals and repay earlier." I don't believe it. Surely not false and untrue information from a BREXIT supporter. I'm shocked . | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Those wanting a different type of passport must of course pay for all of the changes worldwide that will be needed to make it happen. The likely UK costs alone will run to $millions. biometrics are now expected worldwide, so those old paper and card ones won't do. Then there's the cost of changing driving licenses. Pay that too. Our material lives are not affected by these ephemera. Farridge is just a weasel one trick pony using propaganda techniques from the likes of Goebbels." Why not change them to new British ones when the current ones expire if we leave the EU. This could easily be done as a gradual phasing out of the old EU passport and driving licence to the new British ones over a period of time when old passports and driving licences expire and are due for renewal you get the new version. Very simple and surely not beyond the capability of Man, lol. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Maybe if we were out of the EU university fees would be cheaper when you consider that over the last 5 years EU graduates have left owing over £50 million in unpaid fees and it rises every year and apparently the authorities are unable to track them down. What did she think of that? I'd like to know where the information on EU graduates not paying their fees back came from - most of the EU students I know pay their fees back, or had their study covered by their country or employer. Also no, the fees wouldn't go down, not unless you got someone who sincerely believes in education being free or easily accessible. As the last few years have shown, our university system has just become a way of signing young people up to large amounts of debt. The doctor I work under basically feels as though universities and students are being milked for cash by Westminster and are not truly valued. from the Students Loan Company and has been reported in several papers left and right and on the BBC. My figures might have been wrong though, think its more like £98 million now Well I would love it if you could find that student loans company report for me as I am not having much luck. You know, the actual report not a media outlet reporting on it. you won't. Why would they advertise the fact that they can't do their job properly. It was obtained by the media under the freedom of information act What a load of twaddle. The underlying figures you quote were debunked in 2012. You can check that on full facts (search for fullfact.org and are-half-eu-students-failing-repay-their-loans). You don't need a freedom of information request to go to the student loans company web site and look up the official statistics page which fully supports what the full facts site says. You can also read the section on repayment by non UK EU national students that tells you they tend to repay student loans at a faster rate than UK nationals and repay earlier. I don't believe it. Surely not false and untrue information from a BREXIT supporter. I'm shocked ." While we are debunking claims made by people I think it's worth mentioning that itv news at 10 last night debunked the remain campaign claim that 9 out of 10 economists support Remain. 4000 economists were asked and only 600 replied so it's only 9 out of 10 from 600 economists and not the 4000 economists Remain would like us all to think it means. Far be it from the Remain campaign to try to mislead or pull the wool over anyone's eyes though, eh. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Maybe if we were out of the EU university fees would be cheaper when you consider that over the last 5 years EU graduates have left owing over £50 million in unpaid fees and it rises every year and apparently the authorities are unable to track them down. What did she think of that? I'd like to know where the information on EU graduates not paying their fees back came from - most of the EU students I know pay their fees back, or had their study covered by their country or employer. Also no, the fees wouldn't go down, not unless you got someone who sincerely believes in education being free or easily accessible. As the last few years have shown, our university system has just become a way of signing young people up to large amounts of debt. The doctor I work under basically feels as though universities and students are being milked for cash by Westminster and are not truly valued. from the Students Loan Company and has been reported in several papers left and right and on the BBC. My figures might have been wrong though, think its more like £98 million now Well I would love it if you could find that student loans company report for me as I am not having much luck. You know, the actual report not a media outlet reporting on it. you won't. Why would they advertise the fact that they can't do their job properly. It was obtained by the media under the freedom of information act What a load of twaddle. The underlying figures you quote were debunked in 2012. You can check that on full facts (search for fullfact.org and are-half-eu-students-failing-repay-their-loans). You don't need a freedom of information request to go to the student loans company web site and look up the official statistics page which fully supports what the full facts site says. You can also read the section on repayment by non UK EU national students that tells you they tend to repay student loans at a faster rate than UK nationals and repay earlier. I don't believe it. Surely not false and untrue information from a BREXIT supporter. I'm shocked . While we are debunking claims made by people I think it's worth mentioning that itv news at 10 last night debunked the remain campaign claim that 9 out of 10 economists support Remain. 4000 economists were asked and only 600 replied so it's only 9 out of 10 from 600 economists and not the 4000 economists Remain would like us all to think it means. Far be it from the Remain campaign to try to mislead or pull the wool over anyone's eyes though, eh. " It would be interesting to know the thoughts of the other 3400. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"On that basis the very young have the longest future and should also be entitled to vote. I do think 16 years should be able too, they did in Scotland. It is more their future than those who have already messed it all up once. 16 is far too young; they have absolutely no understanding of the big picture; and little sense of responsibility. Mind you, a high proportion of 30 year olds don't have the faintest idea of what goes on in the world around them either. What absolute bollocks!!!! Our 10 year old saw a bit on the news and asked me what it was about as they mentioned a war. I explained in my best 'Devils Advocate' manner the pros and cons (in a slightly simplified way) as I see it. He thought for a minute and then said he'd vote 'remain' while I'm undecided but leaning towards leave. They might be children in your eyes but a lot of them are far from stupid and this vote will effect them a lot more and for a lot longer than most of us forumites. I agree, a lot of younger people seem to know a lot about this subject. However I don't think it would have been right to lower the age limit for this referendum. Even with no charges to the rules many are claiming that the government is trying to gerrymander the role to get the result it wants, especially those from BREXIT. I think it's probably best to stick with the rules we normally use. My younger cousin is 17, she studies politics and sciences and is currently looking at uni choices. She is angry at not being able to vote as she feels well informed and also because she was looking at using the EU as a way to access cheaper uni education in Denmark, Germany, Sweden ect. What I am trying to say is by narrowing it to 18 not 16, a lot of young people, especially those looking at university feel as though their future is being narrowed. She admits that cheaper uni fees would not be enough to persuade her to vote remain, but as a direct impact on her future, it would be a factor. Maybe if we were out of the EU university fees would be cheaper when you consider that over the last 5 years EU graduates have left owing over £50 million in unpaid fees and it rises every year and apparently the authorities are unable to track them down. What did she think of that? I'd like to know where the information on EU graduates not paying their fees back came from - most of the EU students I know pay their fees back, or had their study covered by their country or employer. Also no, the fees wouldn't go down, not unless you got someone who sincerely believes in education being free or easily accessible. As the last few years have shown, our university system has just become a way of signing young people up to large amounts of debt. The doctor I work under basically feels as though universities and students are being milked for cash by Westminster and are not truly valued. from the Students Loan Company and has been reported in several papers left and right and on the BBC. My figures might have been wrong though, think its more like £98 million now Well I would love it if you could find that student loans company report for me as I am not having much luck. You know, the actual report not a media outlet reporting on it. you won't. Why would they advertise the fact that they can't do their job properly. It was obtained by the media under the freedom of information act" What a load of tosh, really. This is just typical of everything BREXITers seem to say. Some half cocked outrage that, when they are asked to backup with any evidence, they simply cannot provide it. And when the truth is pointed out to them do they look at it and accept they might be wrong? Hell no. They just want out and will say any lie, perform any deception on the British people and spread any seditious untruth they can if they think it will convince people to vote leave. They have no ones best interests at heart except their own and least of all the best interests of the British people. They would do more good for their country if they once more went down to the beach, stuck their "glorious English heads" in a hole, hosted a Union Jack up their own petard and cried "for Harry, God and St. George". Bunch of plastic patriots not fit to call themselves British. .... and breathe. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Maybe if we were out of the EU university fees would be cheaper when you consider that over the last 5 years EU graduates have left owing over £50 million in unpaid fees and it rises every year and apparently the authorities are unable to track them down. What did she think of that? I'd like to know where the information on EU graduates not paying their fees back came from - most of the EU students I know pay their fees back, or had their study covered by their country or employer. Also no, the fees wouldn't go down, not unless you got someone who sincerely believes in education being free or easily accessible. As the last few years have shown, our university system has just become a way of signing young people up to large amounts of debt. The doctor I work under basically feels as though universities and students are being milked for cash by Westminster and are not truly valued. from the Students Loan Company and has been reported in several papers left and right and on the BBC. My figures might have been wrong though, think its more like £98 million now Well I would love it if you could find that student loans company report for me as I am not having much luck. You know, the actual report not a media outlet reporting on it. you won't. Why would they advertise the fact that they can't do their job properly. It was obtained by the media under the freedom of information act What a load of twaddle. The underlying figures you quote were debunked in 2012. You can check that on full facts (search for fullfact.org and are-half-eu-students-failing-repay-their-loans). You don't need a freedom of information request to go to the student loans company web site and look up the official statistics page which fully supports what the full facts site says. You can also read the section on repayment by non UK EU national students that tells you they tend to repay student loans at a faster rate than UK nationals and repay earlier. I don't believe it. Surely not false and untrue information from a BREXIT supporter. I'm shocked ." Check out the facts yourself | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"On that basis the very young have the longest future and should also be entitled to vote. I do think 16 years should be able too, they did in Scotland. It is more their future than those who have already messed it all up once. 16 is far too young; they have absolutely no understanding of the big picture; and little sense of responsibility. Mind you, a high proportion of 30 year olds don't have the faintest idea of what goes on in the world around them either. What absolute bollocks!!!! Our 10 year old saw a bit on the news and asked me what it was about as they mentioned a war. I explained in my best 'Devils Advocate' manner the pros and cons (in a slightly simplified way) as I see it. He thought for a minute and then said he'd vote 'remain' while I'm undecided but leaning towards leave. They might be children in your eyes but a lot of them are far from stupid and this vote will effect them a lot more and for a lot longer than most of us forumites. I agree, a lot of younger people seem to know a lot about this subject. However I don't think it would have been right to lower the age limit for this referendum. Even with no charges to the rules many are claiming that the government is trying to gerrymander the role to get the result it wants, especially those from BREXIT. I think it's probably best to stick with the rules we normally use. My younger cousin is 17, she studies politics and sciences and is currently looking at uni choices. She is angry at not being able to vote as she feels well informed and also because she was looking at using the EU as a way to access cheaper uni education in Denmark, Germany, Sweden ect. What I am trying to say is by narrowing it to 18 not 16, a lot of young people, especially those looking at university feel as though their future is being narrowed. She admits that cheaper uni fees would not be enough to persuade her to vote remain, but as a direct impact on her future, it would be a factor. Maybe if we were out of the EU university fees would be cheaper when you consider that over the last 5 years EU graduates have left owing over £50 million in unpaid fees and it rises every year and apparently the authorities are unable to track them down. What did she think of that? I'd like to know where the information on EU graduates not paying their fees back came from - most of the EU students I know pay their fees back, or had their study covered by their country or employer. Also no, the fees wouldn't go down, not unless you got someone who sincerely believes in education being free or easily accessible. As the last few years have shown, our university system has just become a way of signing young people up to large amounts of debt. The doctor I work under basically feels as though universities and students are being milked for cash by Westminster and are not truly valued. from the Students Loan Company and has been reported in several papers left and right and on the BBC. My figures might have been wrong though, think its more like £98 million now Well I would love it if you could find that student loans company report for me as I am not having much luck. You know, the actual report not a media outlet reporting on it. you won't. Why would they advertise the fact that they can't do their job properly. It was obtained by the media under the freedom of information act What a load of tosh, really. This is just typical of everything BREXITers seem to say. Some half cocked outrage that, when they are asked to backup with any evidence, they simply cannot provide it. And when the truth is pointed out to them do they look at it and accept they might be wrong? Hell no. They just want out and will say any lie, perform any deception on the British people and spread any seditious untruth they can if they think it will convince people to vote leave. They have no ones best interests at heart except their own and least of all the best interests of the British people. They would do more good for their country if they once more went down to the beach, stuck their "glorious English heads" in a hole, hosted a Union Jack up their own petard and cried "for Harry, God and St. George". Bunch of plastic patriots not fit to call themselves British. .... and breathe. " That would be half the country then? (And probably a lot more) The Reamainers are frankly easily fooled and deluded | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Those wanting a different type of passport must of course pay for all of the changes worldwide that will be needed to make it happen. The likely UK costs alone will run to $millions. biometrics are now expected worldwide, so those old paper and card ones won't do. Then there's the cost of changing driving licenses. Pay that too. Our material lives are not affected by these ephemera. Farridge is just a weasel one trick pony using propaganda techniques from the likes of Goebbels. Why not change them to new British ones when the current ones expire if we leave the EU. This could easily be done as a gradual phasing out of the old EU passport and driving licence to the new British ones over a period of time when old passports and driving licences expire and are due for renewal you get the new version. Very simple and surely not beyond the capability of Man, lol. " Those wanting the changes can pay for them. There will be hardware and tech changes needed in this country and governments around the world to accommodate our passports - it will likely cost $millions. They're just documents that are a tool for our use as far as I'm concerned. You ready to pay up? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Check out the facts yourself" oh well, nothing like walking back from a position of giving false information and retracting it.... ... and that was nothing like a retraction....... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Those wanting a different type of passport must of course pay for all of the changes worldwide that will be needed to make it happen. The likely UK costs alone will run to $millions. biometrics are now expected worldwide, so those old paper and card ones won't do. Then there's the cost of changing driving licenses. Pay that too. Our material lives are not affected by these ephemera. Farridge is just a weasel one trick pony using propaganda techniques from the likes of Goebbels. Why not change them to new British ones when the current ones expire if we leave the EU. This could easily be done as a gradual phasing out of the old EU passport and driving licence to the new British ones over a period of time when old passports and driving licences expire and are due for renewal you get the new version. Very simple and surely not beyond the capability of Man, lol. Those wanting the changes can pay for them. There will be hardware and tech changes needed in this country and governments around the world to accommodate our passports - it will likely cost $millions. They're just documents that are a tool for our use as far as I'm concerned. You ready to pay up?" Yes I'm sure it would cost millions to remove 2 words, EUROPEAN and UNION from the front page of passports that are due for renewal. I'm sure you are an expert on it so we can all accept your word it would cost millions. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Maybe if we were out of the EU university fees would be cheaper when you consider that over the last 5 years EU graduates have left owing over £50 million in unpaid fees and it rises every year and apparently the authorities are unable to track them down. What did she think of that? I'd like to know where the information on EU graduates not paying their fees back came from - most of the EU students I know pay their fees back, or had their study covered by their country or employer. Also no, the fees wouldn't go down, not unless you got someone who sincerely believes in education being free or easily accessible. As the last few years have shown, our university system has just become a way of signing young people up to large amounts of debt. The doctor I work under basically feels as though universities and students are being milked for cash by Westminster and are not truly valued. from the Students Loan Company and has been reported in several papers left and right and on the BBC. My figures might have been wrong though, think its more like £98 million now Well I would love it if you could find that student loans company report for me as I am not having much luck. You know, the actual report not a media outlet reporting on it. you won't. Why would they advertise the fact that they can't do their job properly. It was obtained by the media under the freedom of information act What a load of twaddle. The underlying figures you quote were debunked in 2012. You can check that on full facts (search for fullfact.org and are-half-eu-students-failing-repay-their-loans). You don't need a freedom of information request to go to the student loans company web site and look up the official statistics page which fully supports what the full facts site says. You can also read the section on repayment by non UK EU national students that tells you they tend to repay student loans at a faster rate than UK nationals and repay earlier. I don't believe it. Surely not false and untrue information from a BREXIT supporter. I'm shocked . While we are debunking claims made by people I think it's worth mentioning that itv news at 10 last night debunked the remain campaign claim that 9 out of 10 economists support Remain. 4000 economists were asked and only 600 replied so it's only 9 out of 10 from 600 economists and not the 4000 economists Remain would like us all to think it means. Far be it from the Remain campaign to try to mislead or pull the wool over anyone's eyes though, eh. It would be interesting to know the thoughts of the other 3400. " but surely if it was more than 60 that had that view on brexit, then surely wouldn't more have stood up and fought for the statistic... and wouldn't someone have done some further info to debunk that number...... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Defection alert.. according to newsnight MP Sarah Woolaston has defected from leave to remain.." Wants a cabinet job on June 24th then? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Maybe if we were out of the EU university fees would be cheaper when you consider that over the last 5 years EU graduates have left owing over £50 million in unpaid fees and it rises every year and apparently the authorities are unable to track them down. What did she think of that? I'd like to know where the information on EU graduates not paying their fees back came from - most of the EU students I know pay their fees back, or had their study covered by their country or employer. Also no, the fees wouldn't go down, not unless you got someone who sincerely believes in education being free or easily accessible. As the last few years have shown, our university system has just become a way of signing young people up to large amounts of debt. The doctor I work under basically feels as though universities and students are being milked for cash by Westminster and are not truly valued. from the Students Loan Company and has been reported in several papers left and right and on the BBC. My figures might have been wrong though, think its more like £98 million now Well I would love it if you could find that student loans company report for me as I am not having much luck. You know, the actual report not a media outlet reporting on it. you won't. Why would they advertise the fact that they can't do their job properly. It was obtained by the media under the freedom of information act What a load of twaddle. The underlying figures you quote were debunked in 2012. You can check that on full facts (search for fullfact.org and are-half-eu-students-failing-repay-their-loans). You don't need a freedom of information request to go to the student loans company web site and look up the official statistics page which fully supports what the full facts site says. You can also read the section on repayment by non UK EU national students that tells you they tend to repay student loans at a faster rate than UK nationals and repay earlier. I don't believe it. Surely not false and untrue information from a BREXIT supporter. I'm shocked . While we are debunking claims made by people I think it's worth mentioning that itv news at 10 last night debunked the remain campaign claim that 9 out of 10 economists support Remain. 4000 economists were asked and only 600 replied so it's only 9 out of 10 from 600 economists and not the 4000 economists Remain would like us all to think it means. Far be it from the Remain campaign to try to mislead or pull the wool over anyone's eyes though, eh. It would be interesting to know the thoughts of the other 3400. but surely if it was more than 60 that had that view on brexit, then surely wouldn't more have stood up and fought for the statistic... and wouldn't someone have done some further info to debunk that number...... " Maybe they couldn't argue a case either way eh. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Defection alert.. according to newsnight MP Sarah Woolaston has defected from leave to remain.. Wants a cabinet job on June 24th then?" No, she's pissed | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Defection alert.. according to newsnight MP Sarah Woolaston has defected from leave to remain.. Wants a cabinet job on June 24th then?" who knows.. she has stated that she isn't happy with the £359 mill figure being quoted by Brexit which she says she knows to be untrue.. and some other issue's with what they have been saying.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Why doesn't everyone just use Full Fact? It's impartial and checking the 'facts' from both sides. " the problem is that if someone fact checks and it isn't true... they don't make a retraction, they use another set of made up facts and see which ones stick.... not saying both sides haven't done it (and it makes me cringe) but when one side has a huge whopper of a lie on their own battlebus and try to double down on that lie when questioned about it... you know people were going to try every fib in the book and see which ones gain traction.... case in point..... the 2.4bn black hole story from monday... leave trumped it, remain denied it.. leave doubled down on this...remain back it up with veto proof, the European comission themselves said it wasn't true and backed it up with more evidence.... then leave slink onto the next story.... what we really need is a nightly section of the news going thru all the claims and getting them fact checked by independent organisations... then making those available to everyone... with "truth" or "lie" next to it.... the u.s news services are very quick to fact check everything said in presidential debates..... why can't they do the same thing here... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Why doesn't everyone just use Full Fact? It's impartial and checking the 'facts' from both sides. the problem is that if someone fact checks and it isn't true... they don't make a retraction, they use another set of made up facts and see which ones stick.... not saying both sides haven't done it (and it makes me cringe) but when one side has a huge whopper of a lie on their own battlebus and try to double down on that lie when questioned about it... you know people were going to try every fib in the book and see which ones gain traction.... case in point..... the 2.4bn black hole story from monday... leave trumped it, remain denied it.. leave doubled down on this...remain back it up with veto proof, the European comission themselves said it wasn't true and backed it up with more evidence.... then leave slink onto the next story.... what we really need is a nightly section of the news going thru all the claims and getting them fact checked by independent organisations... then making those available to everyone... with "truth" or "lie" next to it.... the u.s news services are very quick to fact check everything said in presidential debates..... why can't they do the same thing here..." Radio 4 World At One has been doing some of that. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Why doesn't everyone just use Full Fact? It's impartial and checking the 'facts' from both sides. the problem is that if someone fact checks and it isn't true... they don't make a retraction, they use another set of made up facts and see which ones stick.... not saying both sides haven't done it (and it makes me cringe) but when one side has a huge whopper of a lie on their own battlebus and try to double down on that lie when questioned about it... you know people were going to try every fib in the book and see which ones gain traction.... case in point..... the 2.4bn black hole story from monday... leave trumped it, remain denied it.. leave doubled down on this...remain back it up with veto proof, the European comission themselves said it wasn't true and backed it up with more evidence.... then leave slink onto the next story.... what we really need is a nightly section of the news going thru all the claims and getting them fact checked by independent organisations... then making those available to everyone... with "truth" or "lie" next to it.... the u.s news services are very quick to fact check everything said in presidential debates..... why can't they do the same thing here... Radio 4 World At One has been doing some of that. " in which case... put it on all the main newscasts.... the more people know... the less people would be inclined to do it.... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Maybe if we were out of the EU university fees would be cheaper when you consider that over the last 5 years EU graduates have left owing over £50 million in unpaid fees and it rises every year and apparently the authorities are unable to track them down. What did she think of that? I'd like to know where the information on EU graduates not paying their fees back came from - most of the EU students I know pay their fees back, or had their study covered by their country or employer. Also no, the fees wouldn't go down, not unless you got someone who sincerely believes in education being free or easily accessible. As the last few years have shown, our university system has just become a way of signing young people up to large amounts of debt. The doctor I work under basically feels as though universities and students are being milked for cash by Westminster and are not truly valued. from the Students Loan Company and has been reported in several papers left and right and on the BBC. My figures might have been wrong though, think its more like £98 million now Well I would love it if you could find that student loans company report for me as I am not having much luck. You know, the actual report not a media outlet reporting on it. you won't. Why would they advertise the fact that they can't do their job properly. It was obtained by the media under the freedom of information act What a load of twaddle. The underlying figures you quote were debunked in 2012. You can check that on full facts (search for fullfact.org and are-half-eu-students-failing-repay-their-loans). You don't need a freedom of information request to go to the student loans company web site and look up the official statistics page which fully supports what the full facts site says. You can also read the section on repayment by non UK EU national students that tells you they tend to repay student loans at a faster rate than UK nationals and repay earlier. I don't believe it. Surely not false and untrue information from a BREXIT supporter. I'm shocked . Check out the facts yourself" I have, but clearly you hadn't when you posted, unless you were deliberately mis leading people. A bit like saying we pay £350 million a week when we actually pay £250 million a week and get £100 million back. Or saying that migration into the UK can be cut by using a points based system like Australia, but not like Australian because that would mean immigration levels of 1,000,000+ a year, or that if we leave we will be like Norway but not like Norway, or that thousands of non British EU citizens are going to come to Britain and rape English women, or that 75 million Turks are just waiting for Turkey to join the EU so they can all come and live here when Turkey has no chance of actually joining the EU anytime soon and probably not within the lifetime of anyone on this site, if ever. If you looked into the facts, rather than sticking your head in the sand, you'd know all this. I can only conclude that you either haven't looked at the facts and don't know, or you have looked at the facts but have decided to carry on perpetrating this mass deception on the British people because you don't actually care how much hurt and harm you cause to this country as long as you get what you want. BREXIT = hear no truth BREXIT = see no truth BREXIT = speak no truth | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Why doesn't everyone just use Full Fact? It's impartial and checking the 'facts' from both sides. the problem is that if someone fact checks and it isn't true... they don't make a retraction, they use another set of made up facts and see which ones stick.... not saying both sides haven't done it (and it makes me cringe) but when one side has a huge whopper of a lie on their own battlebus and try to double down on that lie when questioned about it... you know people were going to try every fib in the book and see which ones gain traction.... case in point..... the 2.4bn black hole story from monday... leave trumped it, remain denied it.. leave doubled down on this...remain back it up with veto proof, the European comission themselves said it wasn't true and backed it up with more evidence.... then leave slink onto the next story.... what we really need is a nightly section of the news going thru all the claims and getting them fact checked by independent organisations... then making those available to everyone... with "truth" or "lie" next to it.... the u.s news services are very quick to fact check everything said in presidential debates..... why can't they do the same thing here... Radio 4 World At One has been doing some of that. in which case... put it on all the main newscasts.... the more people know... the less people would be inclined to do it...." It's not sound bitey enough and then we'd miss out on the new porn: Blue on Blue. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So this may seem a silly question but a genuine one . Who gets to vote in the referendum ?meaning do people from other EU countries who live and work here that have a national insurance number but are not UK passport holder? no." Yes . Have an EU ( Not a British one ) passport & will be voting on the 23rd . | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Maybe if we were out of the EU university fees would be cheaper when you consider that over the last 5 years EU graduates have left owing over £50 million in unpaid fees and it rises every year and apparently the authorities are unable to track them down. What did she think of that? I'd like to know where the information on EU graduates not paying their fees back came from - most of the EU students I know pay their fees back, or had their study covered by their country or employer. Also no, the fees wouldn't go down, not unless you got someone who sincerely believes in education being free or easily accessible. As the last few years have shown, our university system has just become a way of signing young people up to large amounts of debt. The doctor I work under basically feels as though universities and students are being milked for cash by Westminster and are not truly valued. from the Students Loan Company and has been reported in several papers left and right and on the BBC. My figures might have been wrong though, think its more like £98 million now Well I would love it if you could find that student loans company report for me as I am not having much luck. You know, the actual report not a media outlet reporting on it. you won't. Why would they advertise the fact that they can't do their job properly. It was obtained by the media under the freedom of information act What a load of twaddle. The underlying figures you quote were debunked in 2012. You can check that on full facts (search for fullfact.org and are-half-eu-students-failing-repay-their-loans). You don't need a freedom of information request to go to the student loans company web site and look up the official statistics page which fully supports what the full facts site says. You can also read the section on repayment by non UK EU national students that tells you they tend to repay student loans at a faster rate than UK nationals and repay earlier. I don't believe it. Surely not false and untrue information from a BREXIT supporter. I'm shocked . Check out the facts yourself I have, but clearly you hadn't when you posted, unless you were deliberately mis leading people. A bit like saying we pay £350 million a week when we actually pay £250 million a week and get £100 million back. Or saying that migration into the UK can be cut by using a points based system like Australia, but not like Australian because that would mean immigration levels of 1,000,000+ a year, or that if we leave we will be like Norway but not like Norway, or that thousands of non British EU citizens are going to come to Britain and rape English women, or that 75 million Turks are just waiting for Turkey to join the EU so they can all come and live here when Turkey has no chance of actually joining the EU anytime soon and probably not within the lifetime of anyone on this site, if ever. If you looked into the facts, rather than sticking your head in the sand, you'd know all this. I can only conclude that you either haven't looked at the facts and don't know, or you have looked at the facts but have decided to carry on perpetrating this mass deception on the British people because you don't actually care how much hurt and harm you cause to this country as long as you get what you want. BREXIT = hear no truth BREXIT = see no truth BREXIT = speak no truth " And you are deluded. Where are the 'facts' from the Remain side? There aren't any. The EU is one big lie. I care a lot about this country and the rest of Europe and its people, including friends and family in Spain and Italy, who by the way would all like to leave the EU. I may stand to lose financially on my property in Spain if we exit but I don't care, this decision is more important than that. It is about the future of this country, the future of Europe and its millions and millions who today sit unemployed and impoverished because of the EU and most importantly for the future of my young son. The EU is a job destroying machine, a political and social experiment gone wrong and the Eurozone a disaster, it all wants tearing down, especially the Eurozone. One day you will realise this and realise how foolish your thoughts are now | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" And you are deluded. Where are the 'facts' from the Remain side? There aren't any. The EU is one big lie. I care a lot about this country and the rest of Europe and its people, including friends and family in Spain and Italy, who by the way would all like to leave the EU. I may stand to lose financially on my property in Spain if we exit but I don't care, this decision is more important than that. It is about the future of this country, the future of Europe and its millions and millions who today sit unemployed and impoverished because of the EU and most importantly for the future of my young son. The EU is a job destroying machine, a political and social experiment gone wrong and the Eurozone a disaster, it all wants tearing down, especially the Eurozone. One day you will realise this and realise how foolish your thoughts are now" How many credible experts want to leave the EU? How many experts think it will be better for us? There are experts from every field imaginable who say that remaining in the EU is better for us. These experts are leaders in their fields, people that we would usually listen to, why are you so keen to think that you know more they they do now? Do you really have so much hubris as to presume you know more about global economy and finance than The World Trade Organisation, The International Monetary Fund, The Bank of England, The US Federal Reserve, Nobel Prize-winners for Economics Amartya Sen, Angus Deaton and Jean Tirol? Do you think you know more about science than the Royal Society or Stephen Hawking? Do you think you know more about peace and security than MI6, MI5, CIA, NSA and NATO? Do you think you know more about workers rights than Unite, Unison, GMB and all the other unions wanting to stay in the EU? Do you think you know more about the NHS than the head of NHS England? All of these people and organisations, the absolute pinnacle of excellence in their respective fields have come together to agree on one thing. I just don’t see how you can think that they have all got it wrong, than you know more than all of them combined, and that you believe it so strongly that you will bet against them all with you son’s future. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"In order to get as many remain votes as possible the EU Referendum allows UK Nationals who are living in the EU a vote. Unlike the Scottish Referendum where the voters had to live in Scotland to get a vote. Just another subtle way to rig the result" having paid tax and NI contributions for 40 year's and moved to France and now paying their tax and NI too, I think I have a right to vote! As a fully paid up member, never claimed any benefits at all, so the UK have made a profit on me. But in a few years I may be entitled to a UK pension which is pay back time. That pension could be affected if we leave - frozen until I die? So yes there are 2 million of us - just imagine all of us returning at once! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Commonwealth migrants from 54 states - including Australia, Canada, India, Pakistan and Nigeria - can join the electoral rolland vote in the EU referendum as long are they are residents in the UK. Unlike the general election, Commonwealth citizens in Gibraltar are also eligible to vote in the EU referendum Citizens from other European countries - apart from Ireland, Malta and Cyprus - will not get a vote on whether the UK remains part of the EU So how do you think these EU citizens living here will vote ?" They can't...if you read the above posts. Though a couple of reports seemed to say many were trying to register and may have contributed to the registration site crashing as they clogged it up. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So this may seem a silly question but a genuine one . Who gets to vote in the referendum ?meaning do people from other EU countries who live and work here that have a national insurance number but are not UK passport holder? no. Yes . Have an EU ( Not a British one ) passport & will be voting on the 23rd . " ALL "UK" passports are now EU passports. But I'm still a UK citizen. It is being a UK citizen that gives me the right to vote...NOT having a passport of any kind....many voters do not have a passport! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Just 1 independent fact: As a nation we owe almost £1.8 trillions which cost's the UK £43 billion in interest per year. EU budget is £10 billion - all on the net. We may be the 5th biggest economy, but built on debt. " Should the UK with this huge amount of dept, vest dept, be paying 2nd highest net figure into the EU considering the amount of dept and the state of our NHS, our schools & education, our roads and transport, our lack of housing, last of flood defence, lack of everything really you think its right we are paying 2nd highest net figure to EU to support other countries who don't have as much dept | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Maybe if we were out of the EU university fees would be cheaper when you consider that over the last 5 years EU graduates have left owing over £50 million in unpaid fees and it rises every year and apparently the authorities are unable to track them down. What did she think of that? I'd like to know where the information on EU graduates not paying their fees back came from - most of the EU students I know pay their fees back, or had their study covered by their country or employer. Also no, the fees wouldn't go down, not unless you got someone who sincerely believes in education being free or easily accessible. As the last few years have shown, our university system has just become a way of signing young people up to large amounts of debt. The doctor I work under basically feels as though universities and students are being milked for cash by Westminster and are not truly valued. from the Students Loan Company and has been reported in several papers left and right and on the BBC. My figures might have been wrong though, think its more like £98 million now Well I would love it if you could find that student loans company report for me as I am not having much luck. You know, the actual report not a media outlet reporting on it. you won't. Why would they advertise the fact that they can't do their job properly. It was obtained by the media under the freedom of information act What a load of twaddle. The underlying figures you quote were debunked in 2012. You can check that on full facts (search for fullfact.org and are-half-eu-students-failing-repay-their-loans). You don't need a freedom of information request to go to the student loans company web site and look up the official statistics page which fully supports what the full facts site says. You can also read the section on repayment by non UK EU national students that tells you they tend to repay student loans at a faster rate than UK nationals and repay earlier. I don't believe it. Surely not false and untrue information from a BREXIT supporter. I'm shocked . Check out the facts yourself I have, but clearly you hadn't when you posted, unless you were deliberately mis leading people. A bit like saying we pay £350 million a week when we actually pay £250 million a week and get £100 million back. Or saying that migration into the UK can be cut by using a points based system like Australia, but not like Australian because that would mean immigration levels of 1,000,000+ a year, or that if we leave we will be like Norway but not like Norway, or that thousands of non British EU citizens are going to come to Britain and rape English women, or that 75 million Turks are just waiting for Turkey to join the EU so they can all come and live here when Turkey has no chance of actually joining the EU anytime soon and probably not within the lifetime of anyone on this site, if ever. If you looked into the facts, rather than sticking your head in the sand, you'd know all this. I can only conclude that you either haven't looked at the facts and don't know, or you have looked at the facts but have decided to carry on perpetrating this mass deception on the British people because you don't actually care how much hurt and harm you cause to this country as long as you get what you want. BREXIT = hear no truth BREXIT = see no truth BREXIT = speak no truth And you are deluded. Where are the 'facts' from the Remain side? There aren't any. The EU is one big lie. I care a lot about this country and the rest of Europe and its people, including friends and family in Spain and Italy, who by the way would all like to leave the EU. I may stand to lose financially on my property in Spain if we exit but I don't care, this decision is more important than that. It is about the future of this country, the future of Europe and its millions and millions who today sit unemployed and impoverished because of the EU and most importantly for the future of my young son. The EU is a job destroying machine, a political and social experiment gone wrong and the Eurozone a disaster, it all wants tearing down, especially the Eurozone. One day you will realise this and realise how foolish your thoughts are now" If you cared about the British people you would, at the very least, tell them the truth. So lets see if you can with a simple question. How much money does the UK actually send to the EU each week? Answer that question truthfully and I might start to take what you say seriously. Answer it with the normal BREXIT lie and I'll have to assume you've either not actually checked you're facts or your deliberately trying to mislead the British people with lies. It's easy to wave a Union Jack, say you really care about the British people and cry Harry, God and St. George but if your actions and rhetoric are actually going to damage the economic chances and opportunities of every single person in this country then, whether it's through ignorance or by deliberate deceit, you're no patriot that I recognise but at best a plastic patriot and at worst a seditious traitor deliberately trying to sow division, mistrust and disharmony between the peoples of this great land. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Just 1 independent fact: As a nation we owe almost £1.8 trillions which cost's the UK £43 billion in interest per year. EU budget is £10 billion - all on the net. We may be the 5th biggest economy, but built on debt. Should the UK with this huge amount of dept, vest dept, be paying 2nd highest net figure into the EU considering the amount of dept and the state of our NHS, our schools & education, our roads and transport, our lack of housing, last of flood defence, lack of everything really you think its right we are paying 2nd highest net figure to EU to support other countries who don't have as much dept " our debt is nothing to do with the EU. It's been down to poor governments for decades of every colour. We are the 5th biggest economy in the world - we are ok as long as we keep paying the credit - the problems start when we can't. Its just like an individual only on a fantasy scale. North sea oil, sale of council houses, privatisation of various companies - where has it all gone? We didn't replace the council house's? Labour, Tories, Lib Dem, UKIP - all the same - look after themselves - bloody politicians! With regards to what we pay the EU - I assume its based on wealth - we continually Bragg about being the 5th largest economy in the world - so we pay for it. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Maybe if we were out of the EU university fees would be cheaper when you consider that over the last 5 years EU graduates have left owing over £50 million in unpaid fees and it rises every year and apparently the authorities are unable to track them down. What did she think of that? I'd like to know where the information on EU graduates not paying their fees back came from - most of the EU students I know pay their fees back, or had their study covered by their country or employer. Also no, the fees wouldn't go down, not unless you got someone who sincerely believes in education being free or easily accessible. As the last few years have shown, our university system has just become a way of signing young people up to large amounts of debt. The doctor I work under basically feels as though universities and students are being milked for cash by Westminster and are not truly valued. from the Students Loan Company and has been reported in several papers left and right and on the BBC. My figures might have been wrong though, think its more like £98 million now Well I would love it if you could find that student loans company report for me as I am not having much luck. You know, the actual report not a media outlet reporting on it. you won't. Why would they advertise the fact that they can't do their job properly. It was obtained by the media under the freedom of information act What a load of twaddle. The underlying figures you quote were debunked in 2012. You can check that on full facts (search for fullfact.org and are-half-eu-students-failing-repay-their-loans). You don't need a freedom of information request to go to the student loans company web site and look up the official statistics page which fully supports what the full facts site says. You can also read the section on repayment by non UK EU national students that tells you they tend to repay student loans at a faster rate than UK nationals and repay earlier. I don't believe it. Surely not false and untrue information from a BREXIT supporter. I'm shocked . Check out the facts yourself I have, but clearly you hadn't when you posted, unless you were deliberately mis leading people. A bit like saying we pay £350 million a week when we actually pay £250 million a week and get £100 million back. Or saying that migration into the UK can be cut by using a points based system like Australia, but not like Australian because that would mean immigration levels of 1,000,000+ a year, or that if we leave we will be like Norway but not like Norway, or that thousands of non British EU citizens are going to come to Britain and rape English women, or that 75 million Turks are just waiting for Turkey to join the EU so they can all come and live here when Turkey has no chance of actually joining the EU anytime soon and probably not within the lifetime of anyone on this site, if ever. If you looked into the facts, rather than sticking your head in the sand, you'd know all this. I can only conclude that you either haven't looked at the facts and don't know, or you have looked at the facts but have decided to carry on perpetrating this mass deception on the British people because you don't actually care how much hurt and harm you cause to this country as long as you get what you want. BREXIT = hear no truth BREXIT = see no truth BREXIT = speak no truth And you are deluded. Where are the 'facts' from the Remain side? There aren't any. The EU is one big lie. I care a lot about this country and the rest of Europe and its people, including friends and family in Spain and Italy, who by the way would all like to leave the EU. I may stand to lose financially on my property in Spain if we exit but I don't care, this decision is more important than that. It is about the future of this country, the future of Europe and its millions and millions who today sit unemployed and impoverished because of the EU and most importantly for the future of my young son. The EU is a job destroying machine, a political and social experiment gone wrong and the Eurozone a disaster, it all wants tearing down, especially the Eurozone. One day you will realise this and realise how foolish your thoughts are now If you cared about the British people you would, at the very least, tell them the truth. So lets see if you can with a simple question. How much money does the UK actually send to the EU each week? Answer that question truthfully and I might start to take what you say seriously. Answer it with the normal BREXIT lie and I'll have to assume you've either not actually checked you're facts or your deliberately trying to mislead the British people with lies. It's easy to wave a Union Jack, say you really care about the British people and cry Harry, God and St. George but if your actions and rhetoric are actually going to damage the economic chances and opportunities of every single person in this country then, whether it's through ignorance or by deliberate deceit, you're no patriot that I recognise but at best a plastic patriot and at worst a seditious traitor deliberately trying to sow division, mistrust and disharmony between the peoples of this great land." Ok so we disagree. So tell me what you mean by 'so long as you get what you want'? What is that do you think and why would I want it? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I ask again Should the UK with this huge amount of dept, vest dept, be paying 2nd highest net figure into the EU considering the amount of dept and the state of our NHS, our schools & education, our roads and transport, our lack of housing, last of flood defence, lack of everything really you think its right we are paying 2nd highest net figure to EU to support other countries who don't have as much dept and our country is in desperate need of repair, housing, schooling, roads & transport and on and on" pay more tax, NI, and providing the UK. Government of the day doesn't mismanage it your shortages' will disappear - 5p in the pound would be a good starting point? If you google EU contribution payments it explains how it is worked out. Don't be lazy and wait for someone to give you an answer - it's all on the net. Simple and its unbiased. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I ask again Should the UK with this huge amount of dept, vest dept, be paying 2nd highest net figure into the EU considering the amount of dept and the state of our NHS, our schools & education, our roads and transport, our lack of housing, last of flood defence, lack of everything really you think its right we are paying 2nd highest net figure to EU to support other countries who don't have as much dept and our country is in desperate need of repair, housing, schooling, roads & transport and on and onpay more tax, NI, and providing the UK. Government of the day doesn't mismanage it your shortages' will disappear - 5p in the pound would be a good starting point? If you google EU contribution payments it explains how it is worked out. Don't be lazy and wait for someone to give you an answer - it's all on the net. Simple and its unbiased." 5p extra tax from who though? Millions don't pay any tax because their pay is so low | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I ask again Should the UK with this huge amount of dept, vest dept, be paying 2nd highest net figure into the EU considering the amount of dept and the state of our NHS, our schools & education, our roads and transport, our lack of housing, last of flood defence, lack of everything really you think its right we are paying 2nd highest net figure to EU to support other countries who don't have as much dept and our country is in desperate need of repair, housing, schooling, roads & transport and on and on" Here we go again. You continue to paint a dismal picture of our country while it suits you, but any minute now you or your mates will be telling us we're the 5th richest country in the world. You should make your mind up and then try to be consistent. To answer your question, no it's wrong that we are paying the 2nd highest net payment to the EU. According to the massively eurosceptic 'money-go-round' web site the UK was 5th highest contributor in 2014 in terms of net cash contribution, 10th highest in terms of contribution per person and 10th highest contributor in terms of percentage of GDP. Your 'claim' of second highest is wrong by all measures. The outturn figures for 2015 aren't available yet but the UK government produced a report in December 2015 on the budgeted figures that put the UK's net contribution in cash terms as third highest. You can find that very easily by searching for "European Union Finances 2015" and looking at the nice little pie chart on page 13. The UK government would say that your claim that the UK makes the second highest net contribution is wrong. You don't tell us what your sources are so I'm going to stick with the UK government and a eurosceptic web site which both say that your sources aren't telling the truth and both give details of the way they work out those numbers. From eurosceptic money-go round, in 2014 our nett contribution in cash terms was 5th highest, in cost per person terms it was 10th highest and as a percentage of GDP it was tenth highest. And it'll be even cheaper next year: the planned budget for the 2017/2018 tax year shows a drop of £1.5 billion pounds in the UK contribution - you can find that on page 17 of the UK government's report from December 2015. Finally YES it is absolutely right and fair that we should pay our fair share into the EU based on national income. What we get is better than fair given that the so called rebate is paid for by real money coming out of the treasuries of every other country in the EU. Do feel free to run down our country again... and I may be wrong here, not that I care given the lies I've seen from Brexiteers, but aren't you the one who boasts about how many Rolexes he has? Baron Hardup, hey? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"you failed to answer the question as you sit back in smugness you could easily pass as a politician avoiding the question as usual" If you can't manage it, do feel free to get your guide dog to read the reply to you. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Think its was meant as people who are entitled to a uk passport not just the ones actually in possession of one Slaps hand in face muttering FFS" | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"you failed to answer the question as you sit back in smugness you could easily pass as a politician avoiding the question as usual If you can't manage it, do feel free to get your guide dog to read the reply to you." as said previously, you are full of waffle and B**shit someone has to tell you the truth | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Commonwealth migrants from 54 states - including Australia, Canada, India, Pakistan and Nigeria - can join the electoral rolland vote in the EU referendum as long are they are residents in the UK. Unlike the general election, Commonwealth citizens in Gibraltar are also eligible to vote in the EU referendum Citizens from other European countries - apart from Ireland, Malta and Cyprus - will not get a vote on whether the UK remains part of the EU So how do you think these EU citizens living here will vote ? Do you mean which way will they vote?Yes ? I'd be camped in the betting shop if I knew that! I'm guessing they would want us to remain.This is our opinion no UK passport = no vote " I don't have a passport, not everyone that's a UK resident has a passport but I'm voting | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I don't have a passport, not everyone that's a UK resident has a passport but I'm voting" yeh; but you do have sexy legs!!!!!!!! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Just 1 independent fact: As a nation we owe almost £1.8 trillions which cost's the UK £43 billion in interest per year. EU budget is £10 billion - all on the net. We may be the 5th biggest economy, but built on debt. Should the UK with this huge amount of dept, vest dept, be paying 2nd highest net figure into the EU considering the amount of dept and the state of our NHS, our schools & education, our roads and transport, our lack of housing, last of flood defence, lack of everything really you think its right we are paying 2nd highest net figure to EU to support other countries who don't have as much dept " Yet again incorrect. Germany pays the most, France second and UK third. Don't you ever check your facts? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"you failed to answer the question as you sit back in smugness you could easily pass as a politician avoiding the question as usual" Your question is based on another BREXIT lie. This time the lie is that we pay the second highest amount into the EU when the reality is that by any measure in any year our contribution is between the 10th and 3rd highest, depending on which year you use and what method you use to calculate it. BREXIT -- hear no truth, see no truth, speak no true. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"you failed to answer the question as you sit back in smugness you could easily pass as a politician avoiding the question as usual If you can't manage it, do feel free to get your guide dog to read the reply to you. as said previously, you are full of waffle and B**shit someone has to tell you the truth " Then tell ur your source for your information. Or is it just more BREXIT lies and disinformation. I'm seriously beginning to think a BREXITER just don't know the truth at all. It's like a foreign concept to them. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"you failed to answer the question as you sit back in smugness you could easily pass as a politician avoiding the question as usual Your question is based on another BREXIT lie. This time the lie is that we pay the second highest amount into the EU when the reality is that by any measure in any year our contribution is between the 10th and 3rd highest, depending on which year you use and what method you use to calculate it. BREXIT -- hear no truth, see no truth, speak no true. " I really don't care much about how much we pay into it or get out of it. I don't really care about the immigration issue either. My concerns are much more fundamental than any of the issues both camps are wrangling over in so much that the EU is undemocratic. We cannot protest Brussels at the ballot box (and by that in mean the commissioners) and that's why I'm voting to leave. We've stood alone for centuries and we'll survive on our own quite easily if we leave. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"you failed to answer the question as you sit back in smugness you could easily pass as a politician avoiding the question as usual Your question is based on another BREXIT lie. This time the lie is that we pay the second highest amount into the EU when the reality is that by any measure in any year our contribution is between the 10th and 3rd highest, depending on which year you use and what method you use to calculate it. BREXIT -- hear no truth, see no truth, speak no true. " Cracken instead of chatting on here look for yourself with regard to net payments it is very easy to find and click the net payments box, if you are unable to find then you really are a concern | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"you failed to answer the question as you sit back in smugness you could easily pass as a politician avoiding the question as usual Your question is based on another BREXIT lie. This time the lie is that we pay the second highest amount into the EU when the reality is that by any measure in any year our contribution is between the 10th and 3rd highest, depending on which year you use and what method you use to calculate it. BREXIT -- hear no truth, see no truth, speak no true. I really don't care much about how much we pay into it or get out of it. I don't really care about the immigration issue either. My concerns are much more fundamental than any of the issues both camps are wrangling over in so much that the EU is undemocratic. We cannot protest Brussels at the ballot box (and by that in mean the commissioners) and that's why I'm voting to leave. We've stood alone for centuries and we'll survive on our own quite easily if we leave. " Well if that's the BREXIT reason for leaving now then why tell all the lies about £350 million a week contribution when it's actually £150 million a week, second highest contribution to EU when it's actually more like 4th, millions of non British EU citizens wanting to come over here to rape our women, and pretty much everything else that comes out of a BRRXITers mouth. As for the undemocratic argument. The EU has three bodies for passing rules, they are The European Council, made up of the heads of democratically elected governments of the member states; The European Council of ministers, made up of ministers from the democratically elected governments of the member states; the European Parliament, made of directly elected members using a voting system that many would argue is more democratic than the one we use for our own General Elections. Where is this undemocratic EU because, when the facts are actually looked at, it's not undemocratic at all. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"you failed to answer the question as you sit back in smugness you could easily pass as a politician avoiding the question as usual Your question is based on another BREXIT lie. This time the lie is that we pay the second highest amount into the EU when the reality is that by any measure in any year our contribution is between the 10th and 3rd highest, depending on which year you use and what method you use to calculate it. BREXIT -- hear no truth, see no truth, speak no true. Cracken instead of chatting on here look for yourself with regard to net payments it is very easy to find and click the net payments box, if you are unable to find then you really are a concern " I have, which is why I know you're lying, again. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Can you protest the president of the eu directly at the ballot box? Can you protest any EU commissioner directly at the ballot box? We are being urged by our own government to democratically choose to be governed undemocratically. " Can you protest the head of state of the UK directly at the ballot box? No Can you protest the UK's Civil Service heads of departments directly at the ballot box? No Does that make the UK fundamentally undemocratic? No Similar for the EU. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"you failed to answer the question as you sit back in smugness you could easily pass as a politician avoiding the question as usual Your question is based on another BREXIT lie. This time the lie is that we pay the second highest amount into the EU when the reality is that by any measure in any year our contribution is between the 10th and 3rd highest, depending on which year you use and what method you use to calculate it. BREXIT -- hear no truth, see no truth, speak no true. Cracken instead of chatting on here look for yourself with regard to net payments it is very easy to find and click the net payments box, if you are unable to find then you really are a concern " As always with politics, especially involving the EU the reality is always a bit blurred. Does Britain contribute 350 million a week? Well yes, but no. Britain's gross contribution is around that figure but to be fair a good bit of it comes back. Some in the form of the rebate and another chunk by way of EU subsidies to various industries, regions, and projects. Where I think Brexit would have a good argument (Gove did touch on it briefly) is that the rebate is not guaranteed forever, Blair proved that when he gave back around half of what Thatcher had won, and the subsidy money, although spent in Britain, is still controlled by the EU not Westminster. Is Britain the second largest contributor to the EU? well yes, but no. In gross cash terms it isn't. As percentage of GDP it isn't. As a net contributor it is. So again Brexit are not telling lies they, like all politicians, are just picking the figure that suits them best. However, when the remain side are threatening us with everything from biblical scale financial disaster and even WW3. What's a few numbers between friends? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I truly believe you live in a land of fairy tales, you have totally lost the plot" So using the much vaunted "la la la, I'm not listening " tactics again You lot bury you heads in the sand a lot... Any figures that are brought up... And onto the next set of diversion tactics It's like you were all given bulletpoints you have to hit | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" What I'm referring to us Merkel announcing that anyone could come to Germany and when 800,000 of them flooded in in ONE WEEK she suspended Schengen and closed Germany's borders with Hungary. " 800000 migrants entering Germany in one week? Was there a big match on? Not even hotlovefun could agree with that load of scaremongering tosh. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We do take in around 300,000 immigrants every year, and that's a net figure. I'm all for immigration but not uncontrolled immigration. If you look at recent events in Germany you'll see what a mass influx of people from an entirely different culture can do to the local populace where they settle. What I'm referring to us Merkel announcing that anyone could come to Germany and when 800,000 of them flooded in in ONE WEEK she suspended Schengen and closed Germany's borders with Hungary. Europe and the UK cannot sustain mass immigration permanently as it will destabilise our economy and place our public services under huge pressure. The EU refuses to reform in any meaningful sense of the word and although a Brexit might hurt us financially for a year or two we will recover. " But we haven't announced everyone can come to the UK have we? Immigration? Words matter! Economic migrants are very different to those that are risking their lives to enter the EU to escape conflict etc and yet the same word is bandied around to describe all sorts of migrants (and refugees). So in terms of 'immigration' what is it we want to control? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
back to top |