FabSwingers.com forum: Ghosts

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

Just currious to hear any stories about the paranormal you may of encountered or scary situations or just really strange unexplainable things that have happened to you

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ty31Man
over a year ago

NW London

I got a meet off this site. That's pretty strange and unexplainable

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *olgateMan
over a year ago

on the road to nowhere in particular

Ghosts exist, there are things in this world that science cannot explain

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

Disagree the only way to explain it would be science

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *iss_Samantha_LovecockTV/TS
over a year ago

bmth /poole sometimes blandford

had a few things happen in a house we lived in and my wife was involved in a famous poltergeist haunting in the 70s so i know theyre real ..

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I believe in ghosts and paranormal, have a couple of experiences, would share by message. XXX

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *edheadsruleCouple
over a year ago

lancashire

I've seen 2, both different entirely

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Disagree the only way to explain it would be science

The trouble with that argument is that the concept of science is to produce a theory for repeatable events. Ghosts don't play to the rules.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

So tell me where are all the cat and dog ghosts and the cows and sheep ghosts and gerbils, the hamsters and the bird and bees ghosts.... where are all the ghost insects and the ghost Fish.... yeah where are all the fish ghosts,,,,

I could tell you.... but you might not believe me...

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *isa 59Woman
over a year ago

Newcastle

"I got a meet off this site. That's pretty strange and unexplainable"

You got a lot more than just one according to your veris

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *olgateMan
over a year ago

on the road to nowhere in particular

"Disagree the only way to explain it would be science

The trouble with that argument is that the concept of science is to produce a theory for repeatable events. Ghosts don't play to the rules."

Science can't explain everything, to say it can would mean we have nothing new to learn.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

Hmm diagree as well

Everything operates with in the laws of physics if we was to see ghost or experience ghosts they would have to be communicating through fundamental properties of nature that we understand

So they must be playing with in the same boundaries as us if they exsist

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"So tell me where are all the cat and dog ghosts and the cows and sheep ghosts and gerbils, the hamsters and the bird and bees ghosts.... where are all the ghost insects and the ghost Fish.... yeah where are all the fish ghosts,,,,

I could tell you.... but you might not believe me...

Oop's nearly forgot..... where are all the KFC bargain bucket ghosts... you know all those the 35 day old chickens that get slaughtered ....... surely they have the right to haunt us...

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

The only way to explain everything is through science I am not saying it has the answer to everything but it is the only way to explain it

Still masses to learn but the only way to learn and explain this would be via science

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *iss_Samantha_LovecockTV/TS
over a year ago

bmth /poole sometimes blandford

I could tell you.... but you might not believe me...

u think every living thing has a ghost ?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Disagree the only way to explain it would be science

The trouble with that argument is that the concept of science is to produce a theory for repeatable events. Ghosts don't play to the rules.

Science can't explain everything, to say it can would mean we have nothing new to learn. "

Very very vaguely true. What it on fact means is we develop new scientific methods to prove them so in the end, science will prove them real or not.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Ghosts exist, there are things in this world that science cannot explain "

No there isn't.. to say "science cannot explain" something instead of "cannot at present explain" means that science is not, and will never be, able to explain.

Which is untrue - as history tells us - science always prevails in the end.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ndykinkyMan
over a year ago

STOKE-ON-TRENT

"Hmm diagree as well

Everything operates with in the laws of physics if we was to see ghost or experience ghosts they would have to be communicating through fundamental properties of nature that we understand

So they must be playing with in the same boundaries as us if they exsist "

But we still don't understand all the laws of physics.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

So with 7 billion people on our planet..... not to factor in all those people who already lived and died and yet not one single scrap of irrefutable evidence to suggest ghost exist

Shame really I would love to see a Dinosaur ghost,,

...

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *oyce69Man
over a year ago

Driffield

In our old house there were things happening that science would find hard to explain.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

We dont you are right but we do understand a few of them and this us allows us to understand the possiabilties of what can and can not work with in the boundaries that we know

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

Care to share ?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Disagree the only way to explain it would be science

The trouble with that argument is that the concept of science is to produce a theory for repeatable events. Ghosts don't play to the rules.

Science can't explain everything, to say it can would mean we have nothing new to learn. "

No it doesn't there will always be something new to learn as we live in a universe the size of which we'll never even be able to appreciate the size of never mind what's actually in it

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I recently took a photo on my camera phone when walking the dog. When I took the photo, I was looking at a scenic little lane that opened on to a wide open green area, very pretty. There was nobody else about at all.

I got home and was checking through the pics. The pic I took, referred to above, made me stop and do a double take. At the end of the lane (where nobody had been stood!!) there was a black shadow. I zoomed in and it looks like the top half of the back of someone with a bag slung over one shoulder.

It really is unnerving.

Have temporarily uploaded it for ya.

Of course it's probably just a smudge on the phone lens or something, but it still creeped me out!!! Posted a pic so you can have a look and put my mind at ease!!

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

Yeah I have just seen it that picture is really creepy lol

Have you ever been back since??

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *olgateMan
over a year ago

on the road to nowhere in particular

"Ghosts exist, there are things in this world that science cannot explain

No there isn't.. to say "science cannot explain" something instead of "cannot at present explain" means that science is not, and will never be, able to explain.

Which is untrue - as history tells us - science always prevails in the end."

Science cannot prove quantum physics or string theory. Does that mean they don't exist? Or because someone in a white coat and an ology says it, it must be true.

Some science says esp doesn't exist yet other case studies and research into low frequency brain and radio waves proves that more research needs to be done.

Science still can't explain why a body weighs less straight after death than immediately before.

Science doesn't have all the answers

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I could tell you.... but you might not believe me...

u think every living thing has a ghost ? "

You think that people have ghosts?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

So I'd be interested to learn if people who believe in ghost also believe in God....?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

Science has proved quantum physics it is science most succesful theory

They have forced molecule into superposition

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *iss_Samantha_LovecockTV/TS
over a year ago

bmth /poole sometimes blandford

You think that people have ghosts?"

yes ..as i said in my first post.

but i dont think every person turns into a ghost when they die..

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Yeah I have just seen it that picture is really creepy lol

Have you ever been back since??"

Yes, but I left it a week lol

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Ghosts exist, there are things in this world that science cannot explain

No there isn't.. to say "science cannot explain" something instead of "cannot at present explain" means that science is not, and will never be, able to explain.

Which is untrue - as history tells us - science always prevails in the end.

Science cannot prove quantum physics or string theory. Does that mean they don't exist? Or because someone in a white coat and an ology says it, it must be true.

Some science says esp doesn't exist yet other case studies and research into low frequency brain and radio waves proves that more research needs to be done.

Science still can't explain why a body weighs less straight after death than immediately before.

Science doesn't have all the answers "

1. Quantum Physics fact? Are you mental? Saying it isn't proves you don't know much OR anything at all about physics.

2. Nobody says string theory is factual - that's why the word "theory" comes after "string".

3. ESP has been proven false - research it.

4. Science has already proven the body doesn't lose weight at the moment of death.

Conclusion - you're a clueless believer in half baked ideas and you remain so because you clearly haven't put in the time to research each subject you've just commented on.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I had a chicken kabab with extra spicey sauce last night. It came back to haunt me about two hours later, the smell was horrific, I had to open the bathroom Windows and spray air freshener. My ring is still on fire!

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

Haha you wimp

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

You think that people have ghosts?

yes ..as i said in my first post.

but i dont think every person turns into a ghost when they die.."

Oh right.. because there's presumably a post mortality natural section process a work to determine who does and doesn't become a "ghost"?? Yawn...

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

I am a physics student but you should not be so harsh one someone for not knowing or understanding

Everyone is entitled to believe no need to come down on the guy because he does not have a great knowledge of physics

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ngel n tedCouple
over a year ago

maidstone

"had a few things happen in a house we lived in and my wife was involved in a famous poltergeist haunting in the 70s so i know theyre real .."

Enfield or pontefract?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Scientists stated the word was flat until someone proved them wrong. There are many things yet unproven and paranormal is just one example.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I recently took a photo on my camera phone when walking the dog. When I took the photo, I was looking at a scenic little lane that opened on to a wide open green area, very pretty. There was nobody else about at all.

It really is unnerving.

Have temporarily uploaded it for ya.

Of course it's probably just a smudge on the phone lens or something, but it still creeped me out!!! Posted a pic so you can have a look and put my mind at ease!!

That's called "a tree" - they're allegedly very common.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"So I'd be interested to learn if people who believe in ghost also believe in God....?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I definitely believe in ghosts, I think I see more than people around me though.

1) Two of my friends used to live in a block of flats, one on the first floor, the other on the floor above and they're both quite sensitive to it as well. One night, the friend who lived in the second floor was out and her flat was completely empty, and I was sat with my friend in the flat before - and we clearly heard coughing and footsteps coming from above us.

Another time in the same building, all three of us were sat watching TV, and another spirit in that building was hanging around. She had been interacting with my friends all night, and when I said that it was alright for that spirit to interact with me I felt a cold spot on one side of my body and felt like my hair was being stroked... one of my friends took a photo and there was a massive orb right next to where I felt my hair stroked.

2) Somewhere that I used to work is a very old, historical building that is apparently haunted, and now it's a conference centre and I used to work in a bar that's contained in the building. I used to get odd feelings in areas of the building, and one day in the kitchen of the bar - note that everyone there that day was wearing black, even the chefs - I saw someone wearing white who disappeared out of the back door of the kitchen. I followed it out of the door - nothing there. I actually worked there for a year & a half but that was the only thing that I actually saw with my own eyes.

3) I believe that animals can leave imprints as well - perhaps not intelligent hauntings, just imprints. My childhood pet cat passed away in his sleep on the landing in my parents' house, and if I'm sat facing the stairs sometimes I'll see a white cat height blur come down the stairs out of the corner of my eye... Though something else really strange happened one day. I was housesitting & my parents take away our current cat on holiday. I was facing the stairs and I saw this same white cat shape come downstairs, faced it head on and it didn't disappear like a trick of the mind, I saw our old cat coming straight down the stairs but he vanished just before he got to the bottom of the stairs. My parents have never seen him though.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It really is unnerving.

Have temporarily uploaded it for ya.

Of course it's probably just a smudge on the phone lens or something, but it still creeped me out!!! Posted a pic so you can have a look and put my mind at ease!!

That's called "a tree" - they're allegedly very common."

Go and empty your tubes.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Well I had a look at the picture......and I ended up looking at your tits instead! Sorry xxx

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It really is unnerving.

Have temporarily uploaded it for ya.

Of course it's probably just a smudge on the phone lens or something, but it still creeped me out!!! Posted a pic so you can have a look and put my mind at ease!!

That's called "a tree" - they're allegedly very common."

You should have gone to Specsavers

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"So I'd be interested to learn if people who believe in ghost also believe in God....?

I believe in ghosts but not God. Believe there must be something though. XXX

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Well I had a look at the picture......and I ended up looking at your tits instead! Sorry xxx "

My cunning plan worked

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Well I had a look at the picture......and I ended up looking at your tits instead! Sorry xxx "

I looked at both tree and tits, the lady has very nice tits XXX

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Anyone been to fort Paul !

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ranny-CrumpetWoman
over a year ago

The Town by The Cross

I could tell you.... but you might not believe me...

In cat, dog, cow, sheep, gerbil , hamster , bird , bee and fish heaven.

Why are all ghosts dressed in period costume? Answer that Soxy

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It really is unnerving.

Have temporarily uploaded it for ya.

Of course it's probably just a smudge on the phone lens or something, but it still creeped me out!!! Posted a pic so you can have a look and put my mind at ease!!

That's called "a tree" - they're allegedly very common.

You should have gone to Specsavers

Since you impied that a tree you seen in one of your pictures was most likely "a ghost" instead of "a tree" I'd be inclined to say that that's abit rich coming from you..

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ranny-CrumpetWoman
over a year ago

The Town by The Cross

I could tell you.... but you might not believe me...

Oop's nearly forgot..... where are all the KFC bargain bucket ghosts... you know all those the 35 day old chickens that get slaughtered ....... surely they have the right to haunt us...

I believe KFC bargain buckets return to haunt people who eat them in one way or another

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *olgateMan
over a year ago

on the road to nowhere in particular

"Ghosts exist, there are things in this world that science cannot explain

No there isn't.. to say "science cannot explain" something instead of "cannot at present explain" means that science is not, and will never be, able to explain.

Which is untrue - as history tells us - science always prevails in the end.

Science cannot prove quantum physics or string theory. Does that mean they don't exist? Or because someone in a white coat and an ology says it, it must be true.

Some science says esp doesn't exist yet other case studies and research into low frequency brain and radio waves proves that more research needs to be done.

Science still can't explain why a body weighs less straight after death than immediately before.

Science doesn't have all the answers

1. Quantum Physics fact? Are you mental? Saying it isn't proves you don't know much OR anything at all about physics.

2. Nobody says string theory is factual - that's why the word "theory" comes after "string".

3. ESP has been proven false - research it.

4. Science has already proven the body doesn't lose weight at the moment of death.

Conclusion - you're a clueless believer in half baked ideas and you remain so because you clearly haven't put in the time to research each subject you've just commented on."

Conclusion: you disprove scientific research that doesn't fit in with your belief system. The body does lose weight after death. Low frequency waves do affect the brain, and can cause different symptoms ranging from euphoria to suicidal feelings. The brain produces brainwaves in these frequencies.

If all you said is true, we should be able to time travel by now. According to you, the concept is proven.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ranny-CrumpetWoman
over a year ago

The Town by The Cross

"Scientists stated the word was flat until someone proved them wrong. There are many things yet unproven and paranormal is just one example. "

It wasn't scientists who said the earth was flat.

It was a lack of science that allowed people to believe stuff they were told for centuries.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It really is unnerving.

Have temporarily uploaded it for ya.

Of course it's probably just a smudge on the phone lens or something, but it still creeped me out!!! Posted a pic so you can have a look and put my mind at ease!!

That's called "a tree" - they're allegedly very common.

You should have gone to Specsavers

Since you impied that a tree you seen in one of your pictures was most likely "a ghost" instead of "a tree" I'd be inclined to say that that's abit rich coming from you.."

It's not a tree but we shall agree to disagree

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I am a physics student but you should not be so harsh one someone for not knowing or understanding

Everyone is entitled to believe no need to come down on the guy because he does not have a great knowledge of physics"

And we shouldn't be too harsh on the scientists, either. Paranormal experiences are difficult to replicate and are quite outside the current bounds of scientific study.

You see, sitting in a lab whispering, "Come here, ghosty, ghosty," doesn't often bring useful results.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Ghosts exist, there are things in this world that science cannot explain

No there isn't.. to say "science cannot explain" something instead of "cannot at present explain" means that science is not, and will never be, able to explain.

Which is untrue - as history tells us - science always prevails in the end.

Science cannot prove quantum physics or string theory. Does that mean they don't exist? Or because someone in a white coat and an ology says it, it must be true.

Some science says esp doesn't exist yet other case studies and research into low frequency brain and radio waves proves that more research needs to be done.

Science still can't explain why a body weighs less straight after death than immediately before.

Science doesn't have all the answers

1. Quantum Physics fact? Are you mental? Saying it isn't proves you don't know much OR anything at all about physics.

2. Nobody says string theory is factual - that's why the word "theory" comes after "string".

3. ESP has been proven false - research it.

4. Science has already proven the body doesn't lose weight at the moment of death.

Conclusion - you're a clueless believer in half baked ideas and you remain so because you clearly haven't put in the time to research each subject you've just commented on.

If all you said is true, we should be able to time travel by now. According to you, the concept is proven. "

The body DOESN'T lose weight when we die - research it.

I never said anything about suicide euphoria so don't dishontstly imply that I did.

We can time travel - it's already a scientific fact.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

We can time travel - it's already a scientific fact.

Are you a scientist? I thought the concept behind science was to create a theory based on observable phenomena. Then to try to disprove it. For all the time the theory remains to be disproved, it is a valid theory.

But never a fact.

Many valid scientific theories, that have stood for a long time, have eventually been disproven.

To use the term "scientific fact" is contrary to the spirit of science.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

We can time travel - it's already a scientific fact.

But never a fact.

Many valid scientific theories, that have stood for a long time, have eventually been disproven.

To use the term "scientific fact" is contrary to the spirit of science."

"Fact" = "a thing that is known or proved to be true"

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *urvymamaWoman
over a year ago

Doncaster

The benefits of science is also its main problem that being that it evolved over time. What once was "absolute fact" one day sometimes then isn't the next, that's occurred plenty of times throughout history

ive had too many encounters with the supernatural to not believe according to a medium I know I'm a conduit for attracting it

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ty31Man
over a year ago

NW London

I don't believe in ghosts but I don't disbelieve either, I've never met one or had a paranormal experience. I know some who have though.

Some years ago I was a courier driver. Got chatting to another driver at the depot who was convinced he had seen the Ghost of a lady, late one evening walking against traffic on the side of the M4 motorway near Heston services at junction 3. She'd vanished when he'd looked in the rear view mirror.

About a year later I was talking to my mates girlfriend. She'd just started a new job and got a lift home after the late shift with one of the guys there. She described seeing a lady walking against traffic on the M4 near Heston services who wasn't there when they looked in the rear mirror. It spooked her when I told her what my former Co worker had said he'd seen

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Apart from the Holy Ghost, there are few things I believe in less...!

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It really is unnerving.

Have temporarily uploaded it for ya.

Of course it's probably just a smudge on the phone lens or something, but it still creeped me out!!! Posted a pic so you can have a look and put my mind at ease!!

It's just Death that, on his holidays, or he might be having a social in Starbucks.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

We can time travel - it's already a scientific fact.

But never a fact.

Many valid scientific theories, that have stood for a long time, have eventually been disproven.

To use the term "scientific fact" is contrary to the spirit of science."

Until disproved. Scientists do need to be accurate.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

We can time travel - it's already a scientific fact.

But never a fact.

Many valid scientific theories, that have stood for a long time, have eventually been disproven.

To use the term "scientific fact" is contrary to the spirit of science."

Time travel is indeed a fact, though not in the way you might imagine it. Time travel is used daily on your GPS system, without accounting for fluctuations in time, your GPS would be several meters askew.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It really is unnerving.

Have temporarily uploaded it for ya.

Of course it's probably just a smudge on the phone lens or something, but it still creeped me out!!! Posted a pic so you can have a look and put my mind at ease!!

It's just Death that, on his holidays, or he might be having a social in Starbucks."

lol

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ensualtouch15Man
over a year ago

ashby de la zouch

I think the probability of plausibility that any essence let alone sentience or physical interaction by a residual something after its human brain has been deactivated and destroyed is in the billions

In short the likelihood that any currently unexplained phenomenon is due to an ex living thing is nigh on zero xxx

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *urvymamaWoman
over a year ago

Doncaster

"I think the probability of plausibility that any essence let alone sentience or physical interaction by a residual something after its human brain has been deactivated and destroyed is in the billions

In short the likelihood that any currently unexplained phenomenon is due to an ex living thing is nigh on zero xxx"

But by using nigh it allows the probability that you could be wrong.

The only true fact in this is that for the time ones yet proved they do exist or that they don't

It's why the topic will continue to be so debatable there no definitive answer either way

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Not a ghost but can science explain why the dog we used to have always barked just before my aunt rang to say she was on her way home. It was always the same time...

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

A few months ago, I got up in the morning, had a coffee and a shower and went into my spare room to get dressed.

I heard a "thump" and turned around. A book had fallen from the table. I didn't think much of it. I just thought it was slightly odd as I had not touched it and it had fallen onto the floor, standing upwards on its bottom edge with the cover outwards. I replaced it on the table.

An hour or so later, my friend came downstairs, having showered and dressed. "Was that you knocking?" she asked. There had been a sharp knocking on the spare room door as she had been getting dressed.

I told her about the book incident. Yes, she too had picked the book up. Yes, it had been on the floor in the same position.

Six or more times during the day, I went into that room. Every time, that damned book was in exactly the same position on the floor, standing on its edge, cover facing outwards. Every time I replaced it on the desk in a different place, sometimes the right way up, sometimes upside down, sometimes to the left and sometimes so far towards the back of the table that it was touching the wall.

The last time I experienced this was when I came down to check at about 3am the next morning, and the book was on the floor again.

I am afraid that there was no scientist on hand to witness this or produce a theory. My own theory is that this was the activity of a ghost or poltergeist. If any scientist wants to disprove my theory, you are welcome, though I appreciate that repeating this in clinical conditions might be difficult.

Fooking scared me, though.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *olgateMan
over a year ago

on the road to nowhere in particular

"Ghosts exist, there are things in this world that science cannot explain

No there isn't.. to say "science cannot explain" something instead of "cannot at present explain" means that science is not, and will never be, able to explain.

Which is untrue - as history tells us - science always prevails in the end.

Science cannot prove quantum physics or string theory. Does that mean they don't exist? Or because someone in a white coat and an ology says it, it must be true.

Some science says esp doesn't exist yet other case studies and research into low frequency brain and radio waves proves that more research needs to be done.

Science still can't explain why a body weighs less straight after death than immediately before.

Science doesn't have all the answers

1. Quantum Physics fact? Are you mental? Saying it isn't proves you don't know much OR anything at all about physics.

2. Nobody says string theory is factual - that's why the word "theory" comes after "string".

3. ESP has been proven false - research it.

4. Science has already proven the body doesn't lose weight at the moment of death.

Conclusion - you're a clueless believer in half baked ideas and you remain so because you clearly haven't put in the time to research each subject you've just commented on.

If all you said is true, we should be able to time travel by now. According to you, the concept is proven.

The body DOESN'T lose weight when we die - research it.

I never said anything about suicide euphoria so don't dishontstly imply that I did.

We can time travel - it's already a scientific fact.

"
really!

You do realise that Time tunnel and Quantum leap aren't true don't you?

As for gps and satnavs, the vagueness of "clock wobble" do not mean one can travel to a different era.

Scientists still haven't explained why clocks in space run slower. Maybe it's the same reason why Internet downloads always end up a couple of minutes behind the freeview signal when they start together

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"My own theory is that this was the activity of a ghost or poltergeist. If any scientist wants to disprove my theory, you are welcome"

Argument from ignorance (from Latin: argumentum ad ignorantiam), also known as appeal to ignorance (in which ignorance represents "a lack of contrary evidence"), is a fallacy in informal logic. It asserts that a proposition is true because it has not yet been proven false (or vice versa).

I suggest someone in the house was winding you up and pissing themselves laughing at you.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ranny-CrumpetWoman
over a year ago

The Town by The Cross

Once, many years ago, I was in a large department store that was almost empty.

I was standing alone in the changing rooms, waiting for one of the shop workers to bring me a dress.

From behind me in the silence I heard a distinct slow swooshing sound. I turned to see the figure of a woman who hadn't been there before. She was dressed head to toe in grey. I froze and closed my eyes. When I opened them - the lady in grey was gone !!!!

Before I could spin or shout the shop girl came with the dress for me to try on.

As she handed me the dress I heard the swooshing noise. I stared at the shop girl and said.. 'Can you see her?' She smiled past me and over my shoulder. I glanced around and the lady in grey was right behind me holding her hand out to the smiling assistant.

I ran as fast as I could and never went back. It's so difficult to explain.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"My own theory is that this was the activity of a ghost or poltergeist. If any scientist wants to disprove my theory, you are welcome

I suggest someone in the house was winding you up and pissing themselves laughing at you. "

Well, the only people in my house were us two and it is quite easy to tell who is upstairs or not. And no one was laughing.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I could tell you.... but you might not believe me...

In cat, dog, cow, sheep, gerbil , hamster , bird , bee and fish heaven.

Why are all ghosts dressed in period costume? Answer that Soxy

Gwanny indeed that is a conundrum that requires consideration... ......

I suspect the answer is less too do with happenstance and more to do with creating a dramatic effect of theatrical proportion ...

I mean lets face if we were given reports of ghosts wearing shell-suits we'd never take them seriously...

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ranny-CrumpetWoman
over a year ago

The Town by The Cross

So I look pale some mornings in my national costume..... take a dig why don't you!

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"So I look pale some mornings in my national costume..... take a dig why don't you!"

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Get out... GET OUT!

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Check out "pandora virus " science meets 4th dimension

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *lectrumMan
over a year ago

south shields

Yeah I've seen a ghost/spirits, it was in a flat I lived in 20 yr ago. They were an old couple standing next to each other, it wasn't scary it just renforced my belief that there is something else after we pass away

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 01/06/16 14:28:04]

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

My cottage is haunted. Keys fall off tables occasionally. Sometimes I hear running upstairs. Its detached so it cannot be the neighbours. Nothing sinister. Ive got use to it over time.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Did any of these experiences put the willies up you?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"My cottage is haunted. Keys fall off tables occasionally. Sometimes I hear running upstairs. Its detached so it cannot be the neighbours. Nothing sinister. Ive got use to it over time."

Just curious....

If you ever decided to sell the cottage would you tell prospective buyers about these sitting tenant(s)

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"My cottage is haunted. Keys fall off tables occasionally. Sometimes I hear running upstairs. Its detached so it cannot be the neighbours. Nothing sinister. Ive got use to it over time.

Just curious....

If you ever decided to sell the cottage would you tell prospective buyers about these sitting tenant(s)

If they had children I would tell them.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"My cottage is haunted. Keys fall off tables occasionally. Sometimes I hear running upstairs. Its detached so it cannot be the neighbours. Nothing sinister. Ive got use to it over time.

Just curious....

If you ever decided to sell the cottage would you tell prospective buyers about these sitting tenant(s)

Hehe. The last time I looked, it is not a question raised on the Standard Enquiries form.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I got a meet off this site. That's pretty strange and unexplainable"

Ha...this.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Billions of people have lived and died, why are there so few ghosts?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

theirs a one legged ghost in my washing maching that keeps stealing a sock

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

My house has two spooks. One is a cat.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"My cottage is haunted. Keys fall off tables occasionally. Sometimes I hear running upstairs. Its detached so it cannot be the neighbours. Nothing sinister. Ive got use to it over time.

Just curious....

If you ever decided to sell the cottage would you tell prospective buyers about these sitting tenant(s)

If they had children I would tell them."

Commendable, but adults can be of a nervous disposition too....

So I'm not sure I entirely approve

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"My cottage is haunted. Keys fall off tables occasionally. Sometimes I hear running upstairs. Its detached so it cannot be the neighbours. Nothing sinister. Ive got use to it over time.

Just curious....

If you ever decided to sell the cottage would you tell prospective buyers about these sitting tenant(s)

Hehe. The last time I looked, it is not a question raised on the Standard Enquiries form."

Well it should be,,,,, I mean there is obviously a need for it,,,

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Billions of people have lived and died, why are there so few ghosts?"

Errr ... perhaps because not everyone becomes a ghost?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"My house has two spooks. One is a cat. "

My parents' house has a ghost cat

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Had a couple of scary experiences

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Also, to a point about believing in ghosts & god... I don't believe in god exactly, but I do believe that there's something more than just this and a godlike symbolism.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"My cottage is haunted. Keys fall off tables occasionally. Sometimes I hear running upstairs. Its detached so it cannot be the neighbours. Nothing sinister. Ive got use to it over time.

Just curious....

If you ever decided to sell the cottage would you tell prospective buyers about these sitting tenant(s)

Hehe. The last time I looked, it is not a question raised on the Standard Enquiries form.

Well it should be,,,,, I mean there is obviously a need for it,,,

It is not something that most perspective buyers - or solicitors - think of raising. (Steven Spielberg would never have got away with THAT film otherwise).

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"My cottage is haunted. Keys fall off tables occasionally. Sometimes I hear running upstairs. Its detached so it cannot be the neighbours. Nothing sinister. Ive got use to it over time.

Just curious....

If you ever decided to sell the cottage would you tell prospective buyers about these sitting tenant(s)

Hehe. The last time I looked, it is not a question raised on the Standard Enquiries form.

Well it should be,,,,, I mean there is obviously a need for it,,,

It is not something that most perspective buyers - or solicitors - think of raising. (Steven Spielberg would never have got away with THAT film otherwise)."

This sort of complacency could lead to so many people suffering disappointment....

I mean if you buy a house in good faith expecting it to be haunted only to find out that the ghost is not in residence you need some right to redress .......

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Billions of people have lived and died, why are there so few ghosts?

Errr ... perhaps because not everyone becomes a ghost?"

Or more likely. There's no such thing

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Had a couple of scary experiences"

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

What happens if you're killed by a ghost or something? Surely you'd become a ghost and then you'll both just be floating there awkwardly

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Ghosts exist, there are things in this world that science cannot explain

No there isn't.. to say "science cannot explain" something instead of "cannot at present explain" means that science is not, and will never be, able to explain.

Which is untrue - as history tells us - science always prevails in the end.

Science cannot prove quantum physics or string theory. Does that mean they don't exist? Or because someone in a white coat and an ology says it, it must be true.

Some science says esp doesn't exist yet other case studies and research into low frequency brain and radio waves proves that more research needs to be done.

Science still can't explain why a body weighs less straight after death than immediately before.

Science doesn't have all the answers

1. Quantum Physics fact? Are you mental? Saying it isn't proves you don't know much OR anything at all about physics.

2. Nobody says string theory is factual - that's why the word "theory" comes after "string".

3. ESP has been proven false - research it.

4. Science has already proven the body doesn't lose weight at the moment of death.

Conclusion - you're a clueless believer in half baked ideas and you remain so because you clearly haven't put in the time to research each subject you've just commented on.

If all you said is true, we should be able to time travel by now. According to you, the concept is proven.

The body DOESN'T lose weight when we die - research it.

I never said anything about suicide euphoria so don't dishontstly imply that I did.

We can time travel - it's already a scientific fact.

really!

You do realise that Time tunnel and Quantum leap aren't true don't you?

As for gps and satnavs, the vagueness of "clock wobble" do not mean one can travel to a different era.

Bollock again - Einstein explained why run slower in space - that's part of the reason he's still so famous.

Also, "quantum leaps" are also scientific fact.

You continue to highlight your lack of knowledge.. so please continue to do so.. I'll continue to be here to correct and discredit you

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Billions of people have lived and died, why are there so few ghosts?

Errr ... perhaps because not everyone becomes a ghost?

Or more likely. There's no such thing

Or that you have not experienced a haunting?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"What happens if you're killed by a ghost or something? Surely you'd become a ghost and then you'll both just be floating there awkwardly

Good point...

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *lectrumMan
over a year ago

south shields

"Billions of people have lived and died, why are there so few ghosts?"

There isn't enough space in the spirit world for every one for whatever reason so the rest of them are reincarnated

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Billions of people have lived and died, why are there so few ghosts?

Errr ... perhaps because not everyone becomes a ghost?

Or more likely. There's no such thing

Or that you have not experienced a haunting?"

So you think there's more chance of ghosts existing rather than not existing. Hand on heart, just like you believe in cars and west quay shopping centre?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Billions of people have lived and died, why are there so few ghosts?

Errr ... perhaps because not everyone becomes a ghost?

Or more likely. There's no such thing

Or that you have not experienced a haunting?

So you think there's more chance of ghosts existing rather than not existing. Hand on heart, just like you believe in cars and west quay shopping centre?"

I've had more experience of being fooking haunted than I have of the West Quay. Neither is a welcome experience for me, I have to admit. On the whole, I would opt for the shopping centre, but only just.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Billions of people have lived and died, why are there so few ghosts?

Errr ... perhaps because not everyone becomes a ghost?

Or more likely. There's no such thing

Or that you have not experienced a haunting?

So you think there's more chance of ghosts existing rather than not existing. Hand on heart, just like you believe in cars and west quay shopping centre?

So get your experiences independently verified. You'll be the world's first.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Billions of people have lived and died, why are there so few ghosts?

Errr ... perhaps because not everyone becomes a ghost?

Or more likely. There's no such thing

Or that you have not experienced a haunting?

So you think there's more chance of ghosts existing rather than not existing. Hand on heart, just like you believe in cars and west quay shopping centre?

So get your experiences independently verified. You'll be the world's first."

Strangely, there never seem to be any available scientists when you need them.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Disagree the only way to explain it would be science

Disagree, science discards anything that it can't justify. There is more to life than science.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Billions of people have lived and died, why are there so few ghosts?

There isn't enough space in the spirit world for every one for whatever reason so the rest of them are reincarnated

Exactly what I was going to say, I am a believer in reincarnation x

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Disagree the only way to explain it would be science

Disagree, science discards anything that it can't justify. There is more to life than science. "

"science disgards anything it can't justify" = lies.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"theirs a one legged ghost in my washing maching that keeps stealing a sock

Heck, I always wondered where all the socks were going ! Lol x

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *olgateMan
over a year ago

on the road to nowhere in particular

"Ghosts exist, there are things in this world that science cannot explain

No there isn't.. to say "science cannot explain" something instead of "cannot at present explain" means that science is not, and will never be, able to explain.

Which is untrue - as history tells us - science always prevails in the end.

Science cannot prove quantum physics or string theory. Does that mean they don't exist? Or because someone in a white coat and an ology says it, it must be true.

Some science says esp doesn't exist yet other case studies and research into low frequency brain and radio waves proves that more research needs to be done.

Science still can't explain why a body weighs less straight after death than immediately before.

Science doesn't have all the answers

1. Quantum Physics fact? Are you mental? Saying it isn't proves you don't know much OR anything at all about physics.

2. Nobody says string theory is factual - that's why the word "theory" comes after "string".

3. ESP has been proven false - research it.

4. Science has already proven the body doesn't lose weight at the moment of death.

Conclusion - you're a clueless believer in half baked ideas and you remain so because you clearly haven't put in the time to research each subject you've just commented on.

If all you said is true, we should be able to time travel by now. According to you, the concept is proven.

The body DOESN'T lose weight when we die - research it.

I never said anything about suicide euphoria so don't dishontstly imply that I did.

We can time travel - it's already a scientific fact.

really!

You do realise that Time tunnel and Quantum leap aren't true don't you?

As for gps and satnavs, the vagueness of "clock wobble" do not mean one can travel to a different era.

Bollock again - Einstein explained why run slower in space - that's part of the reason he's still so famous.

Also, "quantum leaps" are also scientific fact.

You continue to highlight your lack of knowledge.. so please continue to do so.. I'll continue to be here to correct and discredit you

"
the last time I read the daily Sport it said there was a London bus on the moon. That was as much bollocks as your quantum leap theory. For all the evidence you have put before us ghosts could just as easily be time travellers caught in a breach in the space time continuum. Let's face it, wormholes are 10 a penny round here these days.

Show me the evidence of the quantum jumper that dear old albie einsteen built ( no not his Christmas jumper which might be more plausible) at least Leonardos helicopter could actually fly.

Oh and attempting to belittle and ridicule people in such an arrogant way is considered seriously uncool.

Discussion is about putting across a point of view, not being nasty to others.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Billions of people have lived and died, why are there so few ghosts?

There isn't enough space in the spirit world for every one for whatever reason so the rest of them are reincarnated

Exactly what I was going to say, I am a believer in reincarnation x"

"Believing" in something doesn't make it the truth.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

My name is Sox and I believe in the tooth fairy......

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"My name is Sox and I believe in the tooth fairy......

Sorry. I can't believe in the tooth fairy as I have never experienced her (or him).

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"My name is Sox and I believe in the tooth fairy......

Sorry. I can't believe in the tooth fairy as I have never experienced her (or him)."

But the evidence it there for all too see....

Believing makes it real...

You need seek no further....

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I believe as I have seen. I'm spiritualist so pick up images. Currently have spirit cat surround, think he's training stray I adopted about seven weeks ago.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Oo'er ...... Plucked straight from the paranormal encyclopaedia .....

Ghosts.......

Definition: from the O.E. “gast” meaning soul, spirit, life, breath1; the disembodied manifestations of the spirits or souls of deceased humans or animals that survive after death.

So like I asked earlier where are all the ghost animals..... KFC must be riddled with them....

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *isscheekychopsWoman
over a year ago

The land of grey peas and bacon

Who are you going to call?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"My name is Sox and I believe in the tooth fairy......

Sorry. I can't believe in the tooth fairy as I have never experienced her (or him).

But the evidence it there for all too see....

Believing makes it real...

You need seek no further....

Good try, Sox. For me, I am afraid, experiencing makes it "real."

I can fully understand people's cynicism.

P.S. I do wish my experiences were founded on illicit substances.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Look I suspect you are not taking this seriously.......

The Tooth Fairy certainly does exist ......

I have empirical evidence in the form of an small indentation under my pillow where once was placed a freshly discarded tooth.......

How can you dispute such overwhelming proof....

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

Clocks run slower because time is only relative to the person traveling

The faster you travel the more time is dilated. As nothing can travel faster than the speed of light something must give way so energy is converted to mass and you never reach the speed of light and time runs slower.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *olgateMan
over a year ago

on the road to nowhere in particular

I don't know about "out of body" experiences but I've been out of me nut a few times.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *olgateMan
over a year ago

on the road to nowhere in particular

"Clocks run slower because time is only relative to the person traveling

That is only a theory, they once believed that travelling by steam train would be impossible and the body would not be able to breath at the heady speeds attainable then.

They also thought that breaking the sound barrier may prove impossible. Going faster than the speed of light may well be attainable once technology advances.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Disagree the only way to explain it would be science

Disagree, science discards anything that it can't justify. There is more to life than science.

"science disgards anything it can't justify" = lies."

Or scientist having closed minds to other possibilities.

Most reputable scientist admit they don't have all the answers to life. Those who dismiss what they don't understand as lies are lazy and arrogant.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *olgateMan
over a year ago

on the road to nowhere in particular

"Disagree the only way to explain it would be science

Disagree, science discards anything that it can't justify. There is more to life than science.

"science disgards anything it can't justify" = lies.

Or scientist having closed minds to other possibilities.

Most reputable scientist admit they don't have all the answers to life. Those who dismiss what they don't understand as lies are lazy and arrogant."

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Ghosts exist, there are things in this world that science cannot explain

No there isn't.. to say "science cannot explain" something instead of "cannot at present explain" means that science is not, and will never be, able to explain.

Which is untrue - as history tells us - science always prevails in the end.

Science cannot prove quantum physics or string theory. Does that mean they don't exist? Or because someone in a white coat and an ology says it, it must be true.

Some science says esp doesn't exist yet other case studies and research into low frequency brain and radio waves proves that more research needs to be done.

Science still can't explain why a body weighs less straight after death than immediately before.

Science doesn't have all the answers

1. Quantum Physics fact? Are you mental? Saying it isn't proves you don't know much OR anything at all about physics.

2. Nobody says string theory is factual - that's why the word "theory" comes after "string".

3. ESP has been proven false - research it.

4. Science has already proven the body doesn't lose weight at the moment of death.

Conclusion - you're a clueless believer in half baked ideas and you remain so because you clearly haven't put in the time to research each subject you've just commented on.

If all you said is true, we should be able to time travel by now. According to you, the concept is proven.

The body DOESN'T lose weight when we die - research it.

I never said anything about suicide euphoria so don't dishontstly imply that I did.

We can time travel - it's already a scientific fact.

really!

You do realise that Time tunnel and Quantum leap aren't true don't you?

As for gps and satnavs, the vagueness of "clock wobble" do not mean one can travel to a different era.

Bollock again - Einstein explained why run slower in space - that's part of the reason he's still so famous.

Also, "quantum leaps" are also scientific fact.

You continue to highlight your lack of knowledge.. so please continue to do so.. I'll continue to be here to correct and discredit you

the last time I read the daily Sport it said there was a London bus on the moon. That was as much bollocks as your quantum leap theory. For all the evidence you have put before us ghosts could just as easily be time travellers caught in a breach in the space time continuum. Let's face it, wormholes are 10 a penny round here these days.

Show me the evidence of the quantum jumper that dear old albie einsteen built ( no not his Christmas jumper which might be more plausible) at least Leonardos helicopter could actually fly.

Oh and attempting to belittle and ridicule people in such an arrogant way is considered seriously uncool.

Discussion is about putting across a point of view "

1. It's not my theory.

2. The term "Quantum leap" refers to a particle spontaneously disappearing from one point in space and then reappearing in another - hence the term being borrowed by the program "Quantum Leap".

3. Try and explain in your own words what you think what a "space time continuum" is?

Because I'm sure I'll be facinated by your answer..

4. Are they now? That's interesting.. considering nobody has ever seen or detected "a wormhole" so I wonder where you might have gotten that one out of..

5. You couldn't actually be more clueless if you tried could you?

6. I'm aware of what a discussion is.. and I've yet to get one out of you as I've been too busy correcting your half baked disinformation

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Ghosts aside,,,,, I reckon Sigmund Freud would have right old chuckle to himself if he could read some of the posts in this thread.. ...

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ensualtouch15Man
over a year ago

ashby de la zouch

I'd suggest if there was any possibility that ghosts existed It would not be a point of contention !

I'd suggest if there was any possibility that a sentient consciousness continuing from a defunct brain (which a ghost would need to be) that of the millions of sceptics and scientists that are no longer ,one or more would have proven it's existence to the whole community xxx

The lack of such data is indeed compelling evidence that ghosts only exist as the figment of the infinitely fertile minds of humans

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Op why ask a question only to tear down those that believe?

I wouldnt ask whos a christian and then pick apart their religion with my knowledge of science or any subject for that matter. If they hold a belief you dont leave them be our differences are what make us all unique xx

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Mhwahaha Mhwahaha Mhwahaha Mhwahaha

Ooooooooo!!!

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Ghosts exist, there are things in this world that science cannot explain

No there isn't.. to say "science cannot explain" something instead of "cannot at present explain" means that science is not, and will never be, able to explain.

Which is untrue - as history tells us - science always prevails in the end.

Science cannot prove quantum physics or string theory. Does that mean they don't exist? Or because someone in a white coat and an ology says it, it must be true.

Some science says esp doesn't exist yet other case studies and research into low frequency brain and radio waves proves that more research needs to be done.

Science still can't explain why a body weighs less straight after death than immediately before.

Science doesn't have all the answers

1. Quantum Physics fact? Are you mental? Saying it isn't proves you don't know much OR anything at all about physics.

2. Nobody says string theory is factual - that's why the word "theory" comes after "string".

3. ESP has been proven false - research it.

4. Science has already proven the body doesn't lose weight at the moment of death.

Conclusion - you're a clueless believer in half baked ideas and you remain so because you clearly haven't put in the time to research each subject you've just commented on.

If all you said is true, we should be able to time travel by now. According to you, the concept is proven.

The body DOESN'T lose weight when we die - research it.

I never said anything about suicide euphoria so don't dishontstly imply that I did.

We can time travel - it's already a scientific fact.

really!

You do realise that Time tunnel and Quantum leap aren't true don't you?

As for gps and satnavs, the vagueness of "clock wobble" do not mean one can travel to a different era.

Bollock again - Einstein explained why run slower in space - that's part of the reason he's still so famous.

Also, "quantum leaps" are also scientific fact.

You continue to highlight your lack of knowledge.. so please continue to do so.. I'll continue to be here to correct and discredit you

Show me the evidence of the quantum jumper that dear old albie einsteen built ( no not his Christmas jumper which might be more plausible) at least Leonardos helicopter could actually fly.

Oh and attempting to belittle and ridicule people in such an arrogant way is considered seriously uncool.

Discussion is about putting across a point of view

1. It's not my theory.

2. The term "Quantum leap" refers to a particle spontaneously disappearing from one point in space and then reappearing in another - hence the term being borrowed by the program "Quantum Leap".

3. Try and explain in your own words what you think what a "space time continuum" is?

Because I'm sure I'll be facinated by your answer..

4. Are they now? That's interesting.. considering nobody has ever seen or detected "a wormhole" so I wonder where you might have gotten that one out of..

5. You couldn't actually be more clueless if you tried could you?

6. I'm aware of what a discussion is.. and I've yet to get one out of you as I've been too busy correcting your half baked disinformation

Just a couple of points. Mass is not the same as weight. More to the point, energy has mass E=mc^2 tells us this. However whether that mass could be detected in a body before or after death is moot.

Quantum Leap is also known as Atomic transition and relates to subatomic particles moving between energy levels within an atom. Are you sure you're not confusing this with quantum entanglement? But that's not to do with particles travelling across universes.

Max Planck proposed quantum theory, not Einstein. Einstein refused to accept 'spookiness' as he called it.

Lastly, when theoretical physicists are discussing multiverses and not just a universe, and also the nature of information and whether it is a force like energy, I think there is plenty of room not to rule out ghosts or religious beliefs. In some ways science and religion are the same. Rooting round for answers, that may never be proved or disproved.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *olgateMan
over a year ago

on the road to nowhere in particular

"Ghosts exist, there are things in this world that science cannot explain

No there isn't.. to say "science cannot explain" something instead of "cannot at present explain" means that science is not, and will never be, able to explain.

Which is untrue - as history tells us - science always prevails in the end.

Science cannot prove quantum physics or string theory. Does that mean they don't exist? Or because someone in a white coat and an ology says it, it must be true.

Some science says esp doesn't exist yet other case studies and research into low frequency brain and radio waves proves that more research needs to be done.

Science still can't explain why a body weighs less straight after death than immediately before.

Science doesn't have all the answers

1. Quantum Physics fact? Are you mental? Saying it isn't proves you don't know much OR anything at all about physics.

2. Nobody says string theory is factual - that's why the word "theory" comes after "string".

3. ESP has been proven false - research it.

4. Science has already proven the body doesn't lose weight at the moment of death.

Conclusion - you're a clueless believer in half baked ideas and you remain so because you clearly haven't put in the time to research each subject you've just commented on.

If all you said is true, we should be able to time travel by now. According to you, the concept is proven.

The body DOESN'T lose weight when we die - research it.

I never said anything about suicide euphoria so don't dishontstly imply that I did.

We can time travel - it's already a scientific fact.

really!

You do realise that Time tunnel and Quantum leap aren't true don't you?

As for gps and satnavs, the vagueness of "clock wobble" do not mean one can travel to a different era.

Bollock again - Einstein explained why run slower in space - that's part of the reason he's still so famous.

Also, "quantum leaps" are also scientific fact.

You continue to highlight your lack of knowledge.. so please continue to do so.. I'll continue to be here to correct and discredit you

Show me the evidence of the quantum jumper that dear old albie einsteen built ( no not his Christmas jumper which might be more plausible) at least Leonardos helicopter could actually fly.

Oh and attempting to belittle and ridicule people in such an arrogant way is considered seriously uncool.

Discussion is about putting across a point of view

1. It's not my theory.

2. The term "Quantum leap" refers to a particle spontaneously disappearing from one point in space and then reappearing in another - hence the term being borrowed by the program "Quantum Leap".

3. Try and explain in your own words what you think what a "space time continuum" is?

Because I'm sure I'll be facinated by your answer..

4. Are they now? That's interesting.. considering nobody has ever seen or detected "a wormhole" so I wonder where you might have gotten that one out of..

5. You couldn't actually be more clueless if you tried could you?

6. I'm aware of what a discussion is.. and I've yet to get one out of you as I've been too busy correcting your half baked disinformation

"
i don't do half baked anything, it's all well done. I'm not interested in fascinating you in any way either. I know all about what others would call teleportation ie: transferring mass from one point to another similar to the transporters in Star Trek. You fail to explain how this has anything to do with time travel or how objects other than particles can be moved from one point to another. You also fail to fail to show whether this could possibly used to transport large objects over large distances at close to or even faster than the speed of light. You have failed to show any correlation between this and ghosts or spirits. You have failed to understand anything about spectral activity. You have failed to acknowledge any evidence pertaining to poltergeist activity (which cannot be replicated in a lab). You have actually failed in all your arguments on this thread.

The only success you have had on this thread is to perpetuate the image members have of you posting in a rude rude and obnoxious way. If you want to be known as the rudest and most obnoxious person on this site, you still have a way to go.

How is your fan worship and fixation with Scott Bakula going?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Disagree the only way to explain it would be science

Disagree, science discards anything that it can't justify. There is more to life than science.

"science disgards anything it can't justify" = lies.

Or scientist having closed minds to other possibilities.

Most reputable scientist admit they don't have all the answers to life. Those who dismiss what they don't understand as lies are lazy and arrogant."

No scientist knows everything. But as a rule it's their job to investigate stuff. To use tests and logic and evidence to create a "best fit theory" based on the evidence available.

And those theories are always tested and evolve because our scientific knowledge is evolving. It is not static.

In the case of ghosts, I would look at Occam's razor. Which states "Suppose there exist two explanations for an occurrence. In this case the simpler one is usually better."

I would argue it is simpler to explain the idea of ghosts away by the highly suggestive state of the human brain. There's been a lot of research on this. We see what we want to see.

It makes a lot more sense than the existence of the paranormal. I'm sorry it's not very exciting though.

I was personally gutted when they finally proved the Loch Ness Monster wasn't real, and it was first "seen" around the time King Kong was first in the cinema. This was back when cinema was a new and rare thing and the public were highly suggestible. They saw monsters in the lake where there were none.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I would argue it is simpler to explain the idea of ghosts away by the highly suggestive state of the human brain. There's been a lot of research on this. We see what we want to see.

It makes a lot more sense than the existence of the paranormal. I'm sorry it's not very exciting though.

Nice explanation. I don't want to see the fookers, though. I would much rather that I didn't, honestly.

Ah, that would be my sub-conscious begging to be scared silly, no doubt.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *olgateMan
over a year ago

on the road to nowhere in particular

"Disagree the only way to explain it would be science

Disagree, science discards anything that it can't justify. There is more to life than science.

"science disgards anything it can't justify" = lies.

Or scientist having closed minds to other possibilities.

Most reputable scientist admit they don't have all the answers to life. Those who dismiss what they don't understand as lies are lazy and arrogant.

No scientist knows everything. But as a rule it's their job to investigate stuff. To use tests and logic and evidence to create a "best fit theory" based on the evidence available.

And those theories are always tested and evolve because our scientific knowledge is evolving. It is not static.

In the case of ghosts, I would look at Occam's razor. Which states "Suppose there exist two explanations for an occurrence. In this case the simpler one is usually better."

I would argue it is simpler to explain the idea of ghosts away by the highly suggestive state of the human brain. There's been a lot of research on this. We see what we want to see.

It makes a lot more sense than the existence of the paranormal. I'm sorry it's not very exciting though.

How does this explain unconnected people experiencing similar paranormal activity at different times at the same location?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 01/06/16 18:31:40]

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Ghosts aside,,,,, I reckon Sigmund Freud would have right old chuckle to himself if he could read some of the posts in this thread.. ...

Oi! I'll have you know my post was backed up by photographic evidence. I'm taking the whole thread very very seriously

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *incs2someCouple
over a year ago

cleethorpes

using this thread to make a note of the nutters.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *lutandhubbyCouple
over a year ago

west midlands

we used to run a pub that had been on most haunted. used to be a court house many moons ago. they used to hang peeps there, weve seen lots of strange happenings

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *olgateMan
over a year ago

on the road to nowhere in particular

"using this thread to make a note of the nutters.

You need to make three columns.

The closed mind nutters

The open minded nutters

The undecided nutters

You can add a fourth column

For the obnoxious nutters if you wish but that may need cross referencing.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Ghosts aside,,,,, I reckon Sigmund Freud would have right old chuckle to himself if he could read some of the posts in this thread.. ...

Oi! I'll have you know my post was backed up by photographic evidence. I'm taking the whole thread very very seriously

haha yes indeedy and quite right too......

I get the distinct impression some posters are not treating this thread with the due consideration it deserves ...

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *olgateMan
over a year ago

on the road to nowhere in particular

"Ghosts aside,,,,, I reckon Sigmund Freud would have right old chuckle to himself if he could read some of the posts in this thread.. ...

Oi! I'll have you know my post was backed up by photographic evidence. I'm taking the whole thread very very seriously

haha yes indeedy and quite right too......

I get the distinct impression some posters are not treating this thread with the due consideration it deserves ...

"
oy! I represent that remark!

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *iss_Samantha_LovecockTV/TS
over a year ago

bmth /poole sometimes blandford

to the grumpy gentleman ... why are you on this post ?

you have nothing to add to it..

we wernt asked if we beloved in ghosts or not .it was about ghostly experience's

youve not had any

i dont care if you believe or not so stop clogging up an interesting thread ..go and start your own if you feel that way inclined ..you seem to have a lot to say about the subject. all of it quite tedious and small minded

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Ghosts exist, there are things in this world that science cannot explain

No there isn't.. to say "science cannot explain" something instead of "cannot at present explain" means that science is not, and will never be, able to explain.

Which is untrue - as history tells us - science always prevails in the end.

Science cannot prove quantum physics or string theory. Does that mean they don't exist? Or because someone in a white coat and an ology says it, it must be true.

Some science says esp doesn't exist yet other case studies and research into low frequency brain and radio waves proves that more research needs to be done.

Science still can't explain why a body weighs less straight after death than immediately before.

Science doesn't have all the answers

1. Quantum Physics fact? Are you mental? Saying it isn't proves you don't know much OR anything at all about physics.

2. Nobody says string theory is factual - that's why the word "theory" comes after "string".

3. ESP has been proven false - research it.

4. Science has already proven the body doesn't lose weight at the moment of death.

Conclusion - you're a clueless believer in half baked ideas and you remain so because you clearly haven't put in the time to research each subject you've just commented on.

If all you said is true, we should be able to time travel by now. According to you, the concept is proven.

The body DOESN'T lose weight when we die - research it.

I never said anything about suicide euphoria so don't dishontstly imply that I did.

We can time travel - it's already a scientific fact.

really!

You do realise that Time tunnel and Quantum leap aren't true don't you?

As for gps and satnavs, the vagueness of "clock wobble" do not mean one can travel to a different era.

Bollock again - Einstein explained why run slower in space - that's part of the reason he's still so famous.

Also, "quantum leaps" are also scientific fact.

You continue to highlight your lack of knowledge.. so please continue to do so.. I'll continue to be here to correct and discredit you

Show me the evidence of the quantum jumper that dear old albie einsteen built ( no not his Christmas jumper which might be more plausible) at least Leonardos helicopter could actually fly.

Oh and attempting to belittle and ridicule people in such an arrogant way is considered seriously uncool.

Discussion is about putting across a point of view

1. It's not my theory.

2. The term "Quantum leap" refers to a particle spontaneously disappearing from one point in space and then reappearing in another - hence the term being borrowed by the program "Quantum Leap".

3. Try and explain in your own words what you think what a "space time continuum" is?

Because I'm sure I'll be facinated by your answer..

4. Are they now? That's interesting.. considering nobody has ever seen or detected "a wormhole" so I wonder where you might have gotten that one out of..

5. You couldn't actually be more clueless if you tried could you?

6. I'm aware of what a discussion is.. and I've yet to get one out of you as I've been too busy correcting your half baked disinformation

Just a couple of points. Mass is not the same as weight. More to the point, energy has mass E=mc^2 tells us this. However whether that mass could be detected in a body before or after death is moot.

Max Planck proposed quantum theory, not Einstein. Einstein refused to accept 'spookiness' as he called it.

Ok.. "weight" is a measure of "mass" so how exactly is "mass not the same as weight"?

When you can't have one without the other saying "mass is not the same as weight" is about the most ridiculous thing you could have said about it.

Are you a member of the half baked nonsense Brigade too?

Energy doesn't have mass either - it's EQUIVALENT TO MASS. So one can't 'have' one without the other so why are you saying "energy has mass"?

And no.. I wasn't on about entanglement. If I was on about entanglement I would have withoI was on about entanglement because I know exactly what entanglement IS.

So yes, I'm sure I'm not "confusing the two" - do I come across the type to confuse anything considering you people are talking nonsense while I keep correcting you?

I also never said Einstein proposed QM.

(I'm reaching the end of my tolerance for all the half baked nonsense coming out of the people on this thread too by the way so I expect I'll need a nap soon

)

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"to the grumpy gentleman ... why are you on this post ?

you have nothing to add to it..

we wernt asked if we beloved in ghosts or not .it was about ghostly experience's

youve not had any

I'm educating people.. so I'm adding education...

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Ghosts aside,,,,, I reckon Sigmund Freud would have right old chuckle to himself if he could read some of the posts in this thread.. ...

Oi! I'll have you know my post was backed up by photographic evidence. I'm taking the whole thread very very seriously

haha yes indeedy and quite right too......

I get the distinct impression some posters are not treating this thread with the due consideration it deserves ...

oy! I represent that remark!

But seriously dude you should get yourself a corduroy jacket and a cardigan ....

oh and some hush puppies,,,

Trust me ,,,,,,one day you'll be glad of my advice...

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"to the grumpy gentleman ... why are you on this post ?

you have nothing to add to it..

we wernt asked if we beloved in ghosts or not .it was about ghostly experience's

youve not had any

I'm educating people.. so I'm adding education..."

I must have missed the lesson...

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Ghosts exist, there are things in this world that science cannot explain

No there isn't.. to say "science cannot explain" something instead of "cannot at present explain" means that science is not, and will never be, able to explain.

Which is untrue - as history tells us - science always prevails in the end.

Science cannot prove quantum physics or string theory. Does that mean they don't exist? Or because someone in a white coat and an ology says it, it must be true.

Some science says esp doesn't exist yet other case studies and research into low frequency brain and radio waves proves that more research needs to be done.

Science still can't explain why a body weighs less straight after death than immediately before.

Science doesn't have all the answers

1. Quantum Physics fact? Are you mental? Saying it isn't proves you don't know much OR anything at all about physics.

2. Nobody says string theory is factual - that's why the word "theory" comes after "string".

3. ESP has been proven false - research it.

4. Science has already proven the body doesn't lose weight at the moment of death.

Conclusion - you're a clueless believer in half baked ideas and you remain so because you clearly haven't put in the time to research each subject you've just commented on.

If all you said is true, we should be able to time travel by now. According to you, the concept is proven.

The body DOESN'T lose weight when we die - research it.

I never said anything about suicide euphoria so don't dishontstly imply that I did.

We can time travel - it's already a scientific fact.

really!

You do realise that Time tunnel and Quantum leap aren't true don't you?

As for gps and satnavs, the vagueness of "clock wobble" do not mean one can travel to a different era.

Bollock again - Einstein explained why run slower in space - that's part of the reason he's still so famous.

Also, "quantum leaps" are also scientific fact.

You continue to highlight your lack of knowledge.. so please continue to do so.. I'll continue to be here to correct and discredit you

Show me the evidence of the quantum jumper that dear old albie einsteen built ( no not his Christmas jumper which might be more plausible) at least Leonardos helicopter could actually fly.

Oh and attempting to belittle and ridicule people in such an arrogant way is considered seriously uncool.

Discussion is about putting across a point of view

1. It's not my theory.

2. The term "Quantum leap" refers to a particle spontaneously disappearing from one point in space and then reappearing in another - hence the term being borrowed by the program "Quantum Leap".

3. Try and explain in your own words what you think what a "space time continuum" is?

Because I'm sure I'll be facinated by your answer..

4. Are they now? That's interesting.. considering nobody has ever seen or detected "a wormhole" so I wonder where you might have gotten that one out of..

5. You couldn't actually be more clueless if you tried could you?

6. I'm aware of what a discussion is.. and I've yet to get one out of you as I've been too busy correcting your half baked disinformation

i don't do half baked anything, it's all well done. I'm not interested in fascinating you in any way either. I know all about what others would call teleportation ie: transferring mass from one point to another similar to the transporters in Star Trek. You fail to explain how this has anything to do with time travel or how objects other than particles can be moved from one point to another. You also fail to fail to show whether this could possibly used to transport large objects over large distances at close to or even faster than the speed of light. You have failed to show any correlation between this and ghosts or spirits. You have failed to understand anything about spectral activity. You have failed to acknowledge any evidence pertaining to poltergeist activity (which cannot be replicated in a lab). You have actually failed in all your arguments on this thread.

How is your fan worship and fixation with Scott Bakula going?"

It's not down to me to stipulate proofs for the half baked

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Disagree the only way to explain it would be science

how strange...start a thread, asking a perfectly reasonable and quite interesting question, and then wait for just one person to say ghosts exist so you can start a debate with yourself about it.....why not just say you don't believe but....

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *urvymamaWoman
over a year ago

Doncaster

"Ghosts exist, there are things in this world that science cannot explain

No there isn't.. to say "science cannot explain" something instead of "cannot at present explain" means that science is not, and will never be, able to explain.

Which is untrue - as history tells us - science always prevails in the end.

Science cannot prove quantum physics or string theory. Does that mean they don't exist? Or because someone in a white coat and an ology says it, it must be true.

Some science says esp doesn't exist yet other case studies and research into low frequency brain and radio waves proves that more research needs to be done.

Science still can't explain why a body weighs less straight after death than immediately before.

Science doesn't have all the answers

1. Quantum Physics fact? Are you mental? Saying it isn't proves you don't know much OR anything at all about physics.

2. Nobody says string theory is factual - that's why the word "theory" comes after "string".

3. ESP has been proven false - research it.

4. Science has already proven the body doesn't lose weight at the moment of death.

Conclusion - you're a clueless believer in half baked ideas and you remain so because you clearly haven't put in the time to research each subject you've just commented on.

If all you said is true, we should be able to time travel by now. According to you, the concept is proven.

The body DOESN'T lose weight when we die - research it.

I never said anything about suicide euphoria so don't dishontstly imply that I did.

We can time travel - it's already a scientific fact.

really!

You do realise that Time tunnel and Quantum leap aren't true don't you?

As for gps and satnavs, the vagueness of "clock wobble" do not mean one can travel to a different era.

Bollock again - Einstein explained why run slower in space - that's part of the reason he's still so famous.

Also, "quantum leaps" are also scientific fact.

You continue to highlight your lack of knowledge.. so please continue to do so.. I'll continue to be here to correct and discredit you

Show me the evidence of the quantum jumper that dear old albie einsteen built ( no not his Christmas jumper which might be more plausible) at least Leonardos helicopter could actually fly.

Oh and attempting to belittle and ridicule people in such an arrogant way is considered seriously uncool.

Discussion is about putting across a point of view

1. It's not my theory.

2. The term "Quantum leap" refers to a particle spontaneously disappearing from one point in space and then reappearing in another - hence the term being borrowed by the program "Quantum Leap".

3. Try and explain in your own words what you think what a "space time continuum" is?

Because I'm sure I'll be facinated by your answer..

4. Are they now? That's interesting.. considering nobody has ever seen or detected "a wormhole" so I wonder where you might have gotten that one out of..

5. You couldn't actually be more clueless if you tried could you?

6. I'm aware of what a discussion is.. and I've yet to get one out of you as I've been too busy correcting your half baked disinformation

How is your fan worship and fixation with Scott Bakula going?

It's not down to me to stipulate proofs for the half baked"

You can't provide proof, that's why you can't produce any, everything in regards to the paranormal is based on theories and contradicting ones at that

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *inky-MinxWoman
over a year ago

Grantham

Everything operates with in the laws of physics "

Says who?

Science is a bit of a new religion in my opinion. A lot of good in it but there lose ends.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Everything operates with in the laws of physics

Says who?"

Says the laws of physics.. obviously

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ranny-CrumpetWoman
over a year ago

The Town by The Cross

"Billions of people have lived and died, why are there so few ghosts?

There isn't enough space in the spirit world for every one for whatever reason so the rest of them are reincarnated

Exactly what I was going to say, I am a believer in reincarnation x"

Is that like creaming twice ?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Ghosts exist, there are things in this world that science cannot explain

No there isn't.. to say "science cannot explain" something instead of "cannot at present explain" means that science is not, and will never be, able to explain.

Which is untrue - as history tells us - science always prevails in the end.

Science cannot prove quantum physics or string theory. Does that mean they don't exist? Or because someone in a white coat and an ology says it, it must be true.

Some science says esp doesn't exist yet other case studies and research into low frequency brain and radio waves proves that more research needs to be done.

Science still can't explain why a body weighs less straight after death than immediately before.

Science doesn't have all the answers

1. Quantum Physics fact? Are you mental? Saying it isn't proves you don't know much OR anything at all about physics.

2. Nobody says string theory is factual - that's why the word "theory" comes after "string".

3. ESP has been proven false - research it.

4. Science has already proven the body doesn't lose weight at the moment of death.

Conclusion - you're a clueless believer in half baked ideas and you remain so because you clearly haven't put in the time to research each subject you've just commented on.

If all you said is true, we should be able to time travel by now. According to you, the concept is proven.

The body DOESN'T lose weight when we die - research it.

I never said anything about suicide euphoria so don't dishontstly imply that I did.

We can time travel - it's already a scientific fact.

really!

You do realise that Time tunnel and Quantum leap aren't true don't you?

As for gps and satnavs, the vagueness of "clock wobble" do not mean one can travel to a different era.

Bollock again - Einstein explained why run slower in space - that's part of the reason he's still so famous.

Also, "quantum leaps" are also scientific fact.

You continue to highlight your lack of knowledge.. so please continue to do so.. I'll continue to be here to correct and discredit you

Show me the evidence of the quantum jumper that dear old albie einsteen built ( no not his Christmas jumper which might be more plausible) at least Leonardos helicopter could actually fly.

Oh and attempting to belittle and ridicule people in such an arrogant way is considered seriously uncool.

Discussion is about putting across a point of view

1. It's not my theory.

2. The term "Quantum leap" refers to a particle spontaneously disappearing from one point in space and then reappearing in another - hence the term being borrowed by the program "Quantum Leap".

3. Try and explain in your own words what you think what a "space time continuum" is?

Because I'm sure I'll be facinated by your answer..

4. Are they now? That's interesting.. considering nobody has ever seen or detected "a wormhole" so I wonder where you might have gotten that one out of..

5. You couldn't actually be more clueless if you tried could you?

6. I'm aware of what a discussion is.. and I've yet to get one out of you as I've been too busy correcting your half baked disinformation

How is your fan worship and fixation with Scott Bakula going?

It's not down to me to stipulate proofs for the half baked

You can't provide proof, that's why you can't produce any, everything in regards to the paranormal is based on theories and contradicting ones at that "

So you agree it's nonsense then?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ranny-CrumpetWoman
over a year ago

The Town by The Cross

Anyway....

Anyone ever seen a vampire ?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *ranny-CrumpetWoman
over a year ago

The Town by The Cross

Will YOU TWO stop quoting the fuggin' long replies..........

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *urvymamaWoman
over a year ago

Doncaster

"Ghosts exist, there are things in this world that science cannot explain

No there isn't.. to say "science cannot explain" something instead of "cannot at present explain" means that science is not, and will never be, able to explain.

Which is untrue - as history tells us - science always prevails in the end.

Science cannot prove quantum physics or string theory. Does that mean they don't exist? Or because someone in a white coat and an ology says it, it must be true.

Some science says esp doesn't exist yet other case studies and research into low frequency brain and radio waves proves that more research needs to be done.

Science still can't explain why a body weighs less straight after death than immediately before.

Science doesn't have all the answers

1. Quantum Physics fact? Are you mental? Saying it isn't proves you don't know much OR anything at all about physics.

2. Nobody says string theory is factual - that's why the word "theory" comes after "string".

3. ESP has been proven false - research it.

4. Science has already proven the body doesn't lose weight at the moment of death.

Conclusion - you're a clueless believer in half baked ideas and you remain so because you clearly haven't put in the time to research each subject you've just commented on.

If all you said is true, we should be able to time travel by now. According to you, the concept is proven.

The body DOESN'T lose weight when we die - research it.

I never said anything about suicide euphoria so don't dishontstly imply that I did.

We can time travel - it's already a scientific fact.

really!

You do realise that Time tunnel and Quantum leap aren't true don't you?

As for gps and satnavs, the vagueness of "clock wobble" do not mean one can travel to a different era.

Bollock again - Einstein explained why run slower in space - that's part of the reason he's still so famous.

Also, "quantum leaps" are also scientific fact.

You continue to highlight your lack of knowledge.. so please continue to do so.. I'll continue to be here to correct and discredit you

Show me the evidence of the quantum jumper that dear old albie einsteen built ( no not his Christmas jumper which might be more plausible) at least Leonardos helicopter could actually fly.

Oh and attempting to belittle and ridicule people in such an arrogant way is considered seriously uncool.

Discussion is about putting across a point of view

1. It's not my theory.

2. The term "Quantum leap" refers to a particle spontaneously disappearing from one point in space and then reappearing in another - hence the term being borrowed by the program "Quantum Leap".

3. Try and explain in your own words what you think what a "space time continuum" is?

Because I'm sure I'll be facinated by your answer..

4. Are they now? That's interesting.. considering nobody has ever seen or detected "a wormhole" so I wonder where you might have gotten that one out of..

5. You couldn't actually be more clueless if you tried could you?

6. I'm aware of what a discussion is.. and I've yet to get one out of you as I've been too busy correcting your half baked disinformation

How is your fan worship and fixation with Scott Bakula going?

It's not down to me to stipulate proofs for the half baked

You can't provide proof, that's why you can't produce any, everything in regards to the paranormal is based on theories and contradicting ones at that

So you agree it's nonsense then?"

Not at all I'm just merely stating there's not enough eveidence for either side of the debate to prove it either way. Thought that was obvious in what I said, such a Shame so many scientific minds can't use common sense very well

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Ghosts exist, there are things in this world that science cannot explain

No there isn't.. to say "science cannot explain" something instead of "cannot at present explain" means that science is not, and will never be, able to explain.

Which is untrue - as history tells us - science always prevails in the end.

Science cannot prove quantum physics or string theory. Does that mean they don't exist? Or because someone in a white coat and an ology says it, it must be true.

Some science says esp doesn't exist yet other case studies and research into low frequency brain and radio waves proves that more research needs to be done.

Science still can't explain why a body weighs less straight after death than immediately before.

Science doesn't have all the answers

1. Quantum Physics fact? Are you mental? Saying it isn't proves you don't know much OR anything at all about physics.

2. Nobody says string theory is factual - that's why the word "theory" comes after "string".

3. ESP has been proven false - research it.

4. Science has already proven the body doesn't lose weight at the moment of death.

Conclusion - you're a clueless believer in half baked ideas and you remain so because you clearly haven't put in the time to research each subject you've just commented on.

If all you said is true, we should be able to time travel by now. According to you, the concept is proven.

The body DOESN'T lose weight when we die - research it.

I never said anything about suicide euphoria so don't dishontstly imply that I did.

We can time travel - it's already a scientific fact.

really!

You do realise that Time tunnel and Quantum leap aren't true don't you?

As for gps and satnavs, the vagueness of "clock wobble" do not mean one can travel to a different era.

Bollock again - Einstein explained why run slower in space - that's part of the reason he's still so famous.

Also, "quantum leaps" are also scientific fact.

You continue to highlight your lack of knowledge.. so please continue to do so.. I'll continue to be here to correct and discredit you

Show me the evidence of the quantum jumper that dear old albie einsteen built ( no not his Christmas jumper which might be more plausible) at least Leonardos helicopter could actually fly.

Oh and attempting to belittle and ridicule people in such an arrogant way is considered seriously uncool.

Discussion is about putting across a point of view

1. It's not my theory.

2. The term "Quantum leap" refers to a particle spontaneously disappearing from one point in space and then reappearing in another - hence the term being borrowed by the program "Quantum Leap".

3. Try and explain in your own words what you think what a "space time continuum" is?

Because I'm sure I'll be facinated by your answer..

4. Are they now? That's interesting.. considering nobody has ever seen or detected "a wormhole" so I wonder where you might have gotten that one out of..

5. You couldn't actually be more clueless if you tried could you?

6. I'm aware of what a discussion is.. and I've yet to get one out of you as I've been too busy correcting your half baked disinformation

How is your fan worship and fixation with Scott Bakula going?

It's not down to me to stipulate proofs for the half baked

You can't provide proof, that's why you can't produce any, everything in regards to the paranormal is based on theories and contradicting ones at that

So you agree it's nonsense then?

Your last post is a contradiction

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Anyway....

Anyone ever seen a vampire ? "

Not in the mirror Gwanny....

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Will YOU TWO stop quoting the fuggin' long replies..........

THIS!

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *urvymamaWoman
over a year ago

Doncaster

Your last post is a contradiction"

Any more or one than you trying to dis-prove something that can't be dis-proven because it's all based on contradicting theories?

When youve already stated theories aren't scientific fact, that's why they are called theories

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

This website is such a breeding ground for dumb pseudo intellectuals.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Anyway....

Anyone ever seen a vampire ?

Not in the mirror Gwanny....

"
once or twice in a graveyard

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *artytwoCouple
over a year ago

Wolverhampton

I see we're discussing air again?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 01/06/16 19:54:45]

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"This website is such a breeding ground for dumb pseudo intellectuals. "

Tell me about it

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *olgateMan
over a year ago

on the road to nowhere in particular

I love this, ignorant and belligerent, rude and obnoxious, if fair enough but tried to lecture people on science and falls down on two fundamentals

1 doesn't even know the difference between weight and mass!

2 doesn't have the foggiest idea about the very important between a scientific Theory, rule and Law.

Go look it up quickly and attempt to prove me wrong.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I'm a little annoyed with myself that I ignored this thread today - this subject creates such a line between people.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_prizes_for_evidence_of_the_paranormal

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One_Million_Dollar_Paranormal_Challenge

I wonder why none of them have ever been claimed?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I'm a little annoyed with myself that I ignored this thread today - this subject creates such a line between people.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_prizes_for_evidence_of_the_paranormal

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One_Million_Dollar_Paranormal_Challenge

I wonder why none of them have ever been claimed?"

The bastards keep changing the goal posts when I submit my evidence.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *urvymamaWoman
over a year ago

Doncaster

"This website is such a breeding ground for dumb pseudo intellectuals.

Tell me about it

are you agreeing because you've exhibited qualities of a pseudo intellectual yourself?

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *inky-MinxWoman
over a year ago

Grantham

"Will YOU TWO stop quoting the fuggin' long replies..........

THIS!

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *urvymamaWoman
over a year ago

Doncaster

"Will YOU TWO stop quoting the fuggin' long replies..........

THIS!

+1"

We all did stop

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I love this, ignorant and belligerent, rude and obnoxious, if fair enough but tried to lecture people on science and falls down on two fundamentals

1 doesn't even know the difference between weight and mass!

2 doesn't have the foggiest idea about the very important between a scientific Theory, rule and Law.

Go look it up quickly and attempt to prove me wrong. "

1. Two different objects of the same MASS (not volume ffs) that are subject to the same gravitational force are equivalent to the same WEIGHT- how hard is that for you to understand exactly?

2. Damn right I do - you're clearly CLUELESS^^^

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I could tell you.... but you might not believe me...

I would love to see a ghost fish! imagine ghost sharks in the sea,dont want bee or wasp ghosts tho, theyd do my head in when in the garden,little ghost cats everywhere cute and lots of ghost birds so pretty!!! I almost feel like im on some weird trip now lol

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"This website is such a breeding ground for dumb pseudo intellectuals.

Tell me about it

are you agreeing because you've exhibited qualities of a pseudo intellectual yourself?

Clearly I'm not - I'm the one correcting you people for gods sake.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I think this thread has been highly entertaining ,, It's had everything a person needs to make them cringe and laugh in equal measures.....

I mean surely a baboon would be impressed by some of the red arse on display .......

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I'm still none the wiser.

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately

By *urvymamaWoman
over a year ago

Doncaster

"This website is such a breeding ground for dumb pseudo intellectuals.

Tell me about it

are you agreeing because you've exhibited qualities of a pseudo intellectual yourself?

A pseudo intellectual is a person that exhibits intellectual pretentious that have no basis in sound scholarship

While you've exhibited some that do have basis you have also been wrong on a few ocassions (and you've realised that it's touched a nerve so you resorted to insults) the whole discussion as been on a topic that can't be neither dis proved or proved so it isn't really a "sound" topic as it's based in theories so therefore pretensions to begin with, so in a minor way it makes everyone commenting including yourself a pseudo intellectual.

That analysis could be a stretch but I'm sure the intellectuals among us will understand

(closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately