FabSwingers.com forum: Privacy law

By *andeman OP Man
over a year ago

bedforshire

So we cannot find out the name of some celeb who had a 3some. Does anyone care anyway?

Also should we on Fab be celabrating? I for one like my privacy.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Anyone know what celeb it was?! PMs most accepted

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *arry247Couple
over a year ago

Wakefield

"So we cannot find out the name of some celeb who had a 3some. Does anyone care anyway?

Also should we on Fab be celabrating? I for one like my privacy."

No we should not be celebrating.

The super injunction is beyond most ordinary people and is therefore a law that only benefits the rich.

That does not mean we think it is right for such names to be published but law to be just has to apply to everyone not just to those who can afford High Court costs

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *andeman OP Man
over a year ago

bedforshire

Thats a fair point justice must me universal or its not justice.

But if a new privacy law has been invented by this ruling. Than as result of prsedent it should be accessable in the lower cheaper courts.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *olgateMan
over a year ago

on the road to nowhere in particular

The celeb was outed weeks ago

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Anyone know what celeb it was?! PMs most accepted "

Tried but your filters won't allow...but you could pm me

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Anyone know what celeb it was?! PMs most accepted

Tried but your filters won't allow...but you could pm me

Thanks

And if anyone in Scotland can confirm what I have heard PM me please

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It was [***CENSORED***]

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"It was [***CENSORED***]"

Not in Scotland

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ildt123Man
over a year ago

Huddersfield

While the injunction is daft as most of the world know them. I also think the principle is sort of right. Why should someone's sexual behaviour 8 or 9 years ago be reported to the world just because they are famous. I take the point about it only applying to the rich but then it wouldn't be front page news if your weren't rich n famous. Worst sort of lazy gutter journalism if you ask me

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *olgateMan
over a year ago

on the road to nowhere in particular

He's only famous by default

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *verysmileMan
over a year ago

Canterbury

"He's only famous by default "
....on account of his other half. ....

The names are freely available on the USA National Enquirer site via the dark web.....download a browser.....its out there for all to see with an immense underwhelming sense of disappointment when you find out.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *olgateMan
over a year ago

on the road to nowhere in particular

I did want to hear about the paddling pool of olive oil though

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 20/05/16 22:38:53]

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I did want to hear about the paddling pool of olive oil though "

Mystery solved - It was Filippo Berio!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Outted in America

easy to know if you think about it...

Two married. American, gay guys, using their child/ren to protect their anonymity. famous!!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It wasn't the Archbishop then?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *icketysplitsWoman
over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound

Deja vu

I'm sure I read a thread like this a few weeks ago. Then another about a really old super injunction story.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *verysmileMan
over a year ago

Canterbury

Alright...here it is......it was that guy with the other guy....they have named him as....whatshismame......and the other guy who had the bareback threesome with the other guys and the paddling pool full of baby oil was 'that bloke'......clear? Hope I don't get into trouble.

Or as I said before. ..look it up on the dark web.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

Post new Message to Thread