Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
![]() | Back to forum list |
![]() | Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest | ![]() |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This should be fun ![]() ![]() Another champagne socialist who has the proud title of being the most unsuccessful secretary of state ever and married to the guy who signed into law the financial services modernization act (which did more to create the 2008 financial crisis than any bank did). Her vrs a complete idiot. Is there a "reopen nominations" box? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This should be fun ![]() I dislike them both equally but I don't have the choice and we'll have to put up with it for at least 4 years either way | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Prime Minister Boris and Presidente Trump. Be afraid be very afraid. ![]() Boris is going to be finished after we vote to stay | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Prime Minister Boris and Presidente Trump. Be afraid be very afraid. ![]() Not necessarily... That's the whole point - Bojo doesn't believe in Brexit, he's simply setting himself up in opposition to Obbo | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Prime Minister Boris and Presidente Trump. Be afraid be very afraid. ![]() Only if it's a landslide "in" vote. If it's marginal; he will be the next PM. Don't forget; Boris is actually an In supporter; he is only backing Out, because he knows it enhances his chances of becoming Tory Leader ( whichever way the vote goes) | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This should be fun ![]() ![]() I think Americans consider our Conservative politicians to be somewhat socialist? Bernie Sanders is about the closest they've got to a proper one. You wait. If - and it's a big if - if Corbyn is still Labour leader at the next election, I wonder if Americans will view him with the same level of bemusement and fear that most regard Trump. Other end of the telescope, so to speak | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This should be fun ![]() ![]() But the difference is that British isn't a particularly powerful country in the grand scheme of things. I doubt more than 50% of americans could name our current Prime minister. America is a key country in international politics, along with Russia, China and the OPEC countries. Fortunately, as others have mentioned, it's President isn't necessarily all that powerful so swings and roundabouts. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not sure how the world can take a president seriously who shaved Vince McMahons hair bald in a wrestling ring then received a stone cold stunner from Steve Austin. https://youtu.be/MMKFIHRpe7I" If only he sold the stunner like the rock ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not sure how the world can take a president seriously who shaved Vince McMahons hair bald in a wrestling ring then received a stone cold stunner from Steve Austin. https://youtu.be/MMKFIHRpe7I" Are you kidding? That's like his greatest achievement! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This should be fun ![]() ![]() That's because Cameron is, as Obama correctly noted some years ago, a lightweight ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Prime Minister Boris and Presidente Trump. Be afraid be very afraid. ![]() I doubt it tbh. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This should be fun ![]() ![]() ![]() Ha ha Obama calling Cameron a lightweight! Pot and Kettle from Mr "Yes we could have" | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Another correct prediction from South Park: the election will be fought between a giant douche and a turd sandwich. https://youtu.be/bVwh8PW6r88" . Wait a minute... They can't always be right can they?. Only I saw an episode where they dressed somebody as a bear | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Another correct prediction from South Park: the election will be fought between a giant douche and a turd sandwich. https://youtu.be/bVwh8PW6r88. Wait a minute... They can't always be right can they?. Only I saw an episode where they dressed somebody as a bear" They tend to get most things right | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"And they said on here old Donald wouldn't do it. (Comical Ali) Strap in for a bumpy ride it's going to get messy. " He hasn't done it yet. He has to be formally nominated at the GOP convention in Cleveland in July. This could well be a watershed moment for the Republicans as they absolutely don't want Trump, but the backlash from the army of Trump supporters if he is not formally nominated could be very damaging (literally). | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Who cares about the politics... The show will be spectacular. The two dirtiest fuckers in America digging dirt on each other oh roll on summer ![]() Clinton is going to win, it's inevitable. It's just going to annoy me so much when all the people that know nothing about her start smugly saying "well it's great to have a woman president". Yes it is, if you want sexism to triumph over merit. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Clinton is going to win, it's inevitable. It's just going to annoy me so much when all the people that know nothing about her start smugly saying "well it's great to have a woman president". Yes it is, if you want sexism to triumph over merit. " hillary is likely to win..... but hillary has a problem.... next states up on the dem side.... west virginia and kentucky are likely sanders wins.... then onto oregon, where sanders will crush clinton..... which then lead into the final super tuesday... california, new jersey, montana, new mexico, north dakota and south dakota sanders will win 4 of those, (the dakota's, montana, and new mexico) will run her close in new jersey.... and if he nabs california... wow.. she wants to pivot towards trump, but if she doesn't spend any tv money....she is going to have an issue... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Another correct prediction from South Park: the election will be fought between a giant douche and a turd sandwich. https://youtu.be/bVwh8PW6r88" ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sanders wins are all narrow though, and in states that apportion delegates proportionally that's no good Where Hilary wins in places like New York and Caifornia (she's well ahead in their polls there) she tends to win comfortably and they've got lots of delegates Sanders will drag it out but the maths are worse for him than they were for Cruz" just a quick point of correction.... on the democratic side all states are dealt with on a proportional basis... the reason for the lead is a) sanders got crushed in the south.... and b) the super delegates have basically all come down on the side of clinton i think the once thing we have seen is that sanders always starts way behind, but in the states where he actively campaigns, he does really well..... the moment of the 4 big wins in a row (if he does it) coming into california especially if oregon is as i expect somewhere close to 70-30 sanders.... i can see for example where NoCal... (San Fran, Oakland ect) will be strong sanders.... and SoCal (LA, San Diego) will be strong Clinton areas..... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Clinton is going to win, it's inevitable. It's just going to annoy me so much when all the people that know nothing about her start smugly saying "well it's great to have a woman president". Yes it is, if you want sexism to triumph over merit. hillary is likely to win..... but hillary has a problem.... next states up on the dem side.... west virginia and kentucky are likely sanders wins.... then onto oregon, where sanders will crush clinton..... which then lead into the final super tuesday... california, new jersey, montana, new mexico, north dakota and south dakota sanders will win 4 of those, (the dakota's, montana, and new mexico) will run her close in new jersey.... and if he nabs california... wow.. she wants to pivot towards trump, but if she doesn't spend any tv money....she is going to have an issue..." It's ironic that as things stand, the democrats will have a candidate that is more in the pocket of "Big greedy corporations" than republicans. Honestly I couldn't have picked two worse candidates from the original line up. This is like a choice between Dianne Abbot or Jeremy Hunt | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sanders wins are all narrow though, and in states that apportion delegates proportionally that's no good Where Hilary wins in places like New York and Caifornia (she's well ahead in their polls there) she tends to win comfortably and they've got lots of delegates Sanders will drag it out but the maths are worse for him than they were for Cruz" . For sanders it was always about raising awareness in corruption in politics. Ie big money. He'll "drag it" as long as he's got a platform.... But let's not forget Clinton dragged it out all the way to California against Obama with very little chance of winning. I suspect Hillary will struggle more than people think, she's got terrible approval ratings, she's actually disliked massively by alot of democrats and absolutely hated by Republicans. And unlike sanders trump will dig up plenty of shit on her... Her biggest problem politically is her hawkishness with war!, we've yet to hear the redacted 28 pages of the 911 commission but the governor who has seen them has been pretty honest about its implications and then there's the ongoing FBI email investigation... I certainly don't think she'll be in for a easy stroll | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sanders wins are all narrow though, and in states that apportion delegates proportionally that's no good Where Hilary wins in places like New York and Caifornia (she's well ahead in their polls there) she tends to win comfortably and they've got lots of delegates Sanders will drag it out but the maths are worse for him than they were for Cruz. For sanders it was always about raising awareness in corruption in politics. Ie big money. He'll "drag it" as long as he's got a platform.... But let's not forget Clinton dragged it out all the way to California against Obama with very little chance of winning. I suspect Hillary will struggle more than people think, she's got terrible approval ratings, she's actually disliked massively by alot of democrats and absolutely hated by Republicans. And unlike sanders trump will dig up plenty of shit on her... Her biggest problem politically is her hawkishness with war!, we've yet to hear the redacted 28 pages of the 911 commission but the governor who has seen them has been pretty honest about its implications and then there's the ongoing FBI email investigation... I certainly don't think she'll be in for a easy stroll" But look at her competition... even a turd sandwich can beat a giant douche | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As I predicted ![]() I did say right at the start of all this on one of the first presidential election threads that Trump would wipe the floor with Sanders. Usual suspects on here thought it was all a big joke. He who laughs last though. ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There's nothing to stop Bernie Sanders running as independent like Ross Perot did years ago he isn't affiliated to Democratic Party just now and is one of only 2 senators in US just now like this it's not inconceivable that he would throw his hat in or the threat of it would have Hilary scrambling to have him by her side " not a chance.... you'd just end up splitting the democratic party vote and hand the keys to the whitehouse to Trump..... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sanders wins are all narrow though, and in states that apportion delegates proportionally that's no good Where Hilary wins in places like New York and Caifornia (she's well ahead in their polls there) she tends to win comfortably and they've got lots of delegates Sanders will drag it out but the maths are worse for him than they were for Cruz. For sanders it was always about raising awareness in corruption in politics. Ie big money. He'll "drag it" as long as he's got a platform.... But let's not forget Clinton dragged it out all the way to California against Obama with very little chance of winning. I suspect Hillary will struggle more than people think, she's got terrible approval ratings, she's actually disliked massively by alot of democrats and absolutely hated by Republicans. And unlike sanders trump will dig up plenty of shit on her... Her biggest problem politically is her hawkishness with war!, we've yet to hear the redacted 28 pages of the 911 commission but the governor who has seen them has been pretty honest about its implications and then there's the ongoing FBI email investigation... I certainly don't think she'll be in for a easy stroll But look at her competition... even a turd sandwich can beat a giant douche " . She couldn't beat an unknown black guy with a Muslim middle name!. She's only just scrapped through agaist a socialist?. The woman is not as electable as we might think over here | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sanders knows he can't win but wants to influence Hilary's policies to include some of his priorities, and to be fair I think he has and will succeed in that regard Barring Hilary self destructing though I can't see a path for trump to get the 270 votes to be president - I just don't see how he can turn any of the safe democratic states and I can't see how he can win Florida either " There is a lot of anti establishment feeling floating around in America. Clinton is the establishment, and Trump will capitalise on that. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There's nothing to stop Bernie Sanders running as independent like Ross Perot did years ago he isn't affiliated to Democratic Party just now and is one of only 2 senators in US just now like this it's not inconceivable that he would throw his hat in or the threat of it would have Hilary scrambling to have him by her side not a chance.... you'd just end up splitting the democratic party vote and hand the keys to the whitehouse to Trump..... I don't think it's an option either but is a threat that can be used to change some of Hilary's policy's but with Bernie I wouldn't rule out him counting on a Corbyn sequel change at grass roots level with the disen franchised of America who don't normally vote if they think there can be real change " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sanders wins are all narrow though, and in states that apportion delegates proportionally that's no good Where Hilary wins in places like New York and Caifornia (she's well ahead in their polls there) she tends to win comfortably and they've got lots of delegates Sanders will drag it out but the maths are worse for him than they were for Cruz. For sanders it was always about raising awareness in corruption in politics. Ie big money. He'll "drag it" as long as he's got a platform.... But let's not forget Clinton dragged it out all the way to California against Obama with very little chance of winning. I suspect Hillary will struggle more than people think, she's got terrible approval ratings, she's actually disliked massively by alot of democrats and absolutely hated by Republicans. And unlike sanders trump will dig up plenty of shit on her... Her biggest problem politically is her hawkishness with war!, we've yet to hear the redacted 28 pages of the 911 commission but the governor who has seen them has been pretty honest about its implications and then there's the ongoing FBI email investigation... I certainly don't think she'll be in for a easy stroll But look at her competition... even a turd sandwich can beat a giant douche . She couldn't beat an unknown black guy with a Muslim middle name!. She's only just scrapped through agaist a socialist?. The woman is not as electable as we might think over here" You're ignoring the fact that the unknown black guy was handsome as fuck, had Tony Blair's ability to make you believe the future won't be like the past and was back by an awesome campaign team who never once let him be pictured with those dirty cigarettes in his mouth. When you put Obama next to Clinton or Trump he looks like fucking Roosevelt had a baby with Tony Blair (i.e electable) | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sanders knows he can't win but wants to influence Hilary's policies to include some of his priorities, and to be fair I think he has and will succeed in that regard Barring Hilary self destructing though I can't see a path for trump to get the 270 votes to be president - I just don't see how he can turn any of the safe democratic states and I can't see how he can win Florida either " it "could" be done..... but basically the only way you could do it would be sacrifice the latino vote in florida, colorado, arizona , nevada, new nexico, ect ... for the white vote in the midwest.. pennsylvania, ohio, michigan, wisconsin, iowa and new hampshire... but i think he has greater issues.... Florida, North Carolina, Virginia, Indiana, Missouri,... trump winning could even put the likes of Georgia and Utah in play.. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sanders wins are all narrow though, and in states that apportion delegates proportionally that's no good Where Hilary wins in places like New York and Caifornia (she's well ahead in their polls there) she tends to win comfortably and they've got lots of delegates Sanders will drag it out but the maths are worse for him than they were for Cruz. For sanders it was always about raising awareness in corruption in politics. Ie big money. He'll "drag it" as long as he's got a platform.... But let's not forget Clinton dragged it out all the way to California against Obama with very little chance of winning. I suspect Hillary will struggle more than people think, she's got terrible approval ratings, she's actually disliked massively by alot of democrats and absolutely hated by Republicans. And unlike sanders trump will dig up plenty of shit on her... Her biggest problem politically is her hawkishness with war!, we've yet to hear the redacted 28 pages of the 911 commission but the governor who has seen them has been pretty honest about its implications and then there's the ongoing FBI email investigation... I certainly don't think she'll be in for a easy stroll But look at her competition... even a turd sandwich can beat a giant douche . She couldn't beat an unknown black guy with a Muslim middle name!. She's only just scrapped through agaist a socialist?. The woman is not as electable as we might think over here You're ignoring the fact that the unknown black guy was handsome as fuck, had Tony Blair's ability to make you believe the future won't be like the past and was back by an awesome campaign team who never once let him be pictured with those dirty cigarettes in his mouth. When you put Obama next to Clinton or Trump he looks like fucking Roosevelt had a baby with Tony Blair (i.e electable) " . That's easy to say now 8 years later??. It's not like America has never had a handsome black politican before is it or charismatic ones!. He beat Hillary fairly and squarely on one promise... Change! . I could be wrong but I really don't think she'll stroll it | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sanders wins are all narrow though, and in states that apportion delegates proportionally that's no good Where Hilary wins in places like New York and Caifornia (she's well ahead in their polls there) she tends to win comfortably and they've got lots of delegates Sanders will drag it out but the maths are worse for him than they were for Cruz. For sanders it was always about raising awareness in corruption in politics. Ie big money. He'll "drag it" as long as he's got a platform.... But let's not forget Clinton dragged it out all the way to California against Obama with very little chance of winning. I suspect Hillary will struggle more than people think, she's got terrible approval ratings, she's actually disliked massively by alot of democrats and absolutely hated by Republicans. And unlike sanders trump will dig up plenty of shit on her... Her biggest problem politically is her hawkishness with war!, we've yet to hear the redacted 28 pages of the 911 commission but the governor who has seen them has been pretty honest about its implications and then there's the ongoing FBI email investigation... I certainly don't think she'll be in for a easy stroll But look at her competition... even a turd sandwich can beat a giant douche . She couldn't beat an unknown black guy with a Muslim middle name!. She's only just scrapped through agaist a socialist?. The woman is not as electable as we might think over here You're ignoring the fact that the unknown black guy was handsome as fuck, had Tony Blair's ability to make you believe the future won't be like the past and was back by an awesome campaign team who never once let him be pictured with those dirty cigarettes in his mouth. When you put Obama next to Clinton or Trump he looks like fucking Roosevelt had a baby with Tony Blair (i.e electable) . That's easy to say now 8 years later??. It's not like America has never had a handsome black politican before is it or charismatic ones!. He beat Hillary fairly and squarely on one promise... Change! . I could be wrong but I really don't think she'll stroll it " She won't stroll it but there's no stopping half minded voters who will fall for the gender card. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" She won't stroll it but there's no stopping half minded voters who will fall for the gender card. " women are more likely to vote in an election then men..... so this comes along.... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_2gdTrh95jU if that is a republican "anti trump" ad played during the primaries.... imagine what the democrats will come up with.... ![]() ![]() ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sanders wins are all narrow though, and in states that apportion delegates proportionally that's no good Where Hilary wins in places like New York and Caifornia (she's well ahead in their polls there) she tends to win comfortably and they've got lots of delegates Sanders will drag it out but the maths are worse for him than they were for Cruz. For sanders it was always about raising awareness in corruption in politics. Ie big money. He'll "drag it" as long as he's got a platform.... But let's not forget Clinton dragged it out all the way to California against Obama with very little chance of winning. I suspect Hillary will struggle more than people think, she's got terrible approval ratings, she's actually disliked massively by alot of democrats and absolutely hated by Republicans. And unlike sanders trump will dig up plenty of shit on her... Her biggest problem politically is her hawkishness with war!, we've yet to hear the redacted 28 pages of the 911 commission but the governor who has seen them has been pretty honest about its implications and then there's the ongoing FBI email investigation... I certainly don't think she'll be in for a easy stroll But look at her competition... even a turd sandwich can beat a giant douche . She couldn't beat an unknown black guy with a Muslim middle name!. She's only just scrapped through agaist a socialist?. The woman is not as electable as we might think over here You're ignoring the fact that the unknown black guy was handsome as fuck, had Tony Blair's ability to make you believe the future won't be like the past and was back by an awesome campaign team who never once let him be pictured with those dirty cigarettes in his mouth. When you put Obama next to Clinton or Trump he looks like fucking Roosevelt had a baby with Tony Blair (i.e electable) . That's easy to say now 8 years later??. It's not like America has never had a handsome black politican before is it or charismatic ones!. He beat Hillary fairly and squarely on one promise... Change! . I could be wrong but I really don't think she'll stroll it She won't stroll it but there's no stopping half minded voters who will fall for the gender card. " Or the let's not vote for a lunatic card? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sanders wins are all narrow though, and in states that apportion delegates proportionally that's no good Where Hilary wins in places like New York and Caifornia (she's well ahead in their polls there) she tends to win comfortably and they've got lots of delegates Sanders will drag it out but the maths are worse for him than they were for Cruz. For sanders it was always about raising awareness in corruption in politics. Ie big money. He'll "drag it" as long as he's got a platform.... But let's not forget Clinton dragged it out all the way to California against Obama with very little chance of winning. I suspect Hillary will struggle more than people think, she's got terrible approval ratings, she's actually disliked massively by alot of democrats and absolutely hated by Republicans. And unlike sanders trump will dig up plenty of shit on her... Her biggest problem politically is her hawkishness with war!, we've yet to hear the redacted 28 pages of the 911 commission but the governor who has seen them has been pretty honest about its implications and then there's the ongoing FBI email investigation... I certainly don't think she'll be in for a easy stroll But look at her competition... even a turd sandwich can beat a giant douche . She couldn't beat an unknown black guy with a Muslim middle name!. She's only just scrapped through agaist a socialist?. The woman is not as electable as we might think over here You're ignoring the fact that the unknown black guy was handsome as fuck, had Tony Blair's ability to make you believe the future won't be like the past and was back by an awesome campaign team who never once let him be pictured with those dirty cigarettes in his mouth. When you put Obama next to Clinton or Trump he looks like fucking Roosevelt had a baby with Tony Blair (i.e electable) . That's easy to say now 8 years later??. It's not like America has never had a handsome black politican before is it or charismatic ones!. He beat Hillary fairly and squarely on one promise... Change! . I could be wrong but I really don't think she'll stroll it She won't stroll it but there's no stopping half minded voters who will fall for the gender card. Or the let's not vote for a lunatic card?" Hence why she'll win! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sanders wins are all narrow though, and in states that apportion delegates proportionally that's no good Where Hilary wins in places like New York and Caifornia (she's well ahead in their polls there) she tends to win comfortably and they've got lots of delegates Sanders will drag it out but the maths are worse for him than they were for Cruz. For sanders it was always about raising awareness in corruption in politics. Ie big money. He'll "drag it" as long as he's got a platform.... But let's not forget Clinton dragged it out all the way to California against Obama with very little chance of winning. I suspect Hillary will struggle more than people think, she's got terrible approval ratings, she's actually disliked massively by alot of democrats and absolutely hated by Republicans. And unlike sanders trump will dig up plenty of shit on her... Her biggest problem politically is her hawkishness with war!, we've yet to hear the redacted 28 pages of the 911 commission but the governor who has seen them has been pretty honest about its implications and then there's the ongoing FBI email investigation... I certainly don't think she'll be in for a easy stroll But look at her competition... even a turd sandwich can beat a giant douche . She couldn't beat an unknown black guy with a Muslim middle name!. She's only just scrapped through agaist a socialist?. The woman is not as electable as we might think over here You're ignoring the fact that the unknown black guy was handsome as fuck, had Tony Blair's ability to make you believe the future won't be like the past and was back by an awesome campaign team who never once let him be pictured with those dirty cigarettes in his mouth. When you put Obama next to Clinton or Trump he looks like fucking Roosevelt had a baby with Tony Blair (i.e electable) . That's easy to say now 8 years later??. It's not like America has never had a handsome black politican before is it or charismatic ones!. He beat Hillary fairly and squarely on one promise... Change! . I could be wrong but I really don't think she'll stroll it She won't stroll it but there's no stopping half minded voters who will fall for the gender card. Or the let's not vote for a lunatic card?" Lunatic? He's just misunderstood ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sanders wins are all narrow though, and in states that apportion delegates proportionally that's no good Where Hilary wins in places like New York and Caifornia (she's well ahead in their polls there) she tends to win comfortably and they've got lots of delegates Sanders will drag it out but the maths are worse for him than they were for Cruz. For sanders it was always about raising awareness in corruption in politics. Ie big money. He'll "drag it" as long as he's got a platform.... But let's not forget Clinton dragged it out all the way to California against Obama with very little chance of winning. I suspect Hillary will struggle more than people think, she's got terrible approval ratings, she's actually disliked massively by alot of democrats and absolutely hated by Republicans. And unlike sanders trump will dig up plenty of shit on her... Her biggest problem politically is her hawkishness with war!, we've yet to hear the redacted 28 pages of the 911 commission but the governor who has seen them has been pretty honest about its implications and then there's the ongoing FBI email investigation... I certainly don't think she'll be in for a easy stroll But look at her competition... even a turd sandwich can beat a giant douche . She couldn't beat an unknown black guy with a Muslim middle name!. She's only just scrapped through agaist a socialist?. The woman is not as electable as we might think over here You're ignoring the fact that the unknown black guy was handsome as fuck, had Tony Blair's ability to make you believe the future won't be like the past and was back by an awesome campaign team who never once let him be pictured with those dirty cigarettes in his mouth. When you put Obama next to Clinton or Trump he looks like fucking Roosevelt had a baby with Tony Blair (i.e electable) . That's easy to say now 8 years later??. It's not like America has never had a handsome black politican before is it or charismatic ones!. He beat Hillary fairly and squarely on one promise... Change! . I could be wrong but I really don't think she'll stroll it She won't stroll it but there's no stopping half minded voters who will fall for the gender card. Or the let's not vote for a lunatic card? Lunatic? He's just misunderstood ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() About as misunderstood as Charles Manson... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sanders wins are all narrow though, and in states that apportion delegates proportionally that's no good Where Hilary wins in places like New York and Caifornia (she's well ahead in their polls there) she tends to win comfortably and they've got lots of delegates Sanders will drag it out but the maths are worse for him than they were for Cruz. For sanders it was always about raising awareness in corruption in politics. Ie big money. He'll "drag it" as long as he's got a platform.... But let's not forget Clinton dragged it out all the way to California against Obama with very little chance of winning. I suspect Hillary will struggle more than people think, she's got terrible approval ratings, she's actually disliked massively by alot of democrats and absolutely hated by Republicans. And unlike sanders trump will dig up plenty of shit on her... Her biggest problem politically is her hawkishness with war!, we've yet to hear the redacted 28 pages of the 911 commission but the governor who has seen them has been pretty honest about its implications and then there's the ongoing FBI email investigation... I certainly don't think she'll be in for a easy stroll But look at her competition... even a turd sandwich can beat a giant douche . She couldn't beat an unknown black guy with a Muslim middle name!. She's only just scrapped through agaist a socialist?. The woman is not as electable as we might think over here You're ignoring the fact that the unknown black guy was handsome as fuck, had Tony Blair's ability to make you believe the future won't be like the past and was back by an awesome campaign team who never once let him be pictured with those dirty cigarettes in his mouth. When you put Obama next to Clinton or Trump he looks like fucking Roosevelt had a baby with Tony Blair (i.e electable) . That's easy to say now 8 years later??. It's not like America has never had a handsome black politican before is it or charismatic ones!. He beat Hillary fairly and squarely on one promise... Change! . I could be wrong but I really don't think she'll stroll it She won't stroll it but there's no stopping half minded voters who will fall for the gender card. Or the let's not vote for a lunatic card? Lunatic? He's just misunderstood ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ^^^^^^ ![]() ![]() ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This should be fun ![]() More boring than fun | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sanders wins are all narrow though, and in states that apportion delegates proportionally that's no good Where Hilary wins in places like New York and Caifornia (she's well ahead in their polls there) she tends to win comfortably and they've got lots of delegates Sanders will drag it out but the maths are worse for him than they were for Cruz. For sanders it was always about raising awareness in corruption in politics. Ie big money. He'll "drag it" as long as he's got a platform.... But let's not forget Clinton dragged it out all the way to California against Obama with very little chance of winning. I suspect Hillary will struggle more than people think, she's got terrible approval ratings, she's actually disliked massively by alot of democrats and absolutely hated by Republicans. And unlike sanders trump will dig up plenty of shit on her... Her biggest problem politically is her hawkishness with war!, we've yet to hear the redacted 28 pages of the 911 commission but the governor who has seen them has been pretty honest about its implications and then there's the ongoing FBI email investigation... I certainly don't think she'll be in for a easy stroll But look at her competition... even a turd sandwich can beat a giant douche . She couldn't beat an unknown black guy with a Muslim middle name!. She's only just scrapped through agaist a socialist?. The woman is not as electable as we might think over here You're ignoring the fact that the unknown black guy was handsome as fuck, had Tony Blair's ability to make you believe the future won't be like the past and was back by an awesome campaign team who never once let him be pictured with those dirty cigarettes in his mouth. When you put Obama next to Clinton or Trump he looks like fucking Roosevelt had a baby with Tony Blair (i.e electable) . That's easy to say now 8 years later??. It's not like America has never had a handsome black politican before is it or charismatic ones!. He beat Hillary fairly and squarely on one promise... Change! . I could be wrong but I really don't think she'll stroll it She won't stroll it but there's no stopping half minded voters who will fall for the gender card. Or the let's not vote for a lunatic card? Lunatic? He's just misunderstood ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() .....but a whole lot more dangerous. ... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"let's face it the yanks love to have a loon in power. Reagan was near enough senile when he got in, bush was bonkers and Bush junior was rejected from the muppets for bwing too much of a dummy and he needed a lot of cheating to help him get in. So, wouldn't be a surprise if crackpot Mr Fart got in. have you seen the people at his rallies? The guys look like dyed in the wool bible bashing crazies or redneck inbreeds and the women (younger ones) look like gold diggers and older ones Ma baker types. If crazies like Putin, Kim jong un or Mugabe along with the bizarre weather don't persuade you that the world is about to end then having Trump for US president should. Only consolation is he wouldn't take office til 2017 so I can get this years holidays done." Actually Bush Junior was just a raving alcoholic rather than outright dumb. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"let's face it the yanks love to have a loon in power. Reagan was near enough senile when he got in, bush was bonkers and Bush junior was rejected from the muppets for bwing too much of a dummy and he needed a lot of cheating to help him get in. So, wouldn't be a surprise if crackpot Mr Fart got in. have you seen the people at his rallies? The guys look like dyed in the wool bible bashing crazies or redneck inbreeds and the women (younger ones) look like gold diggers and older ones Ma baker types. If crazies like Putin, Kim jong un or Mugabe along with the bizarre weather don't persuade you that the world is about to end then having Trump for US president should. Only consolation is he wouldn't take office til 2017 so I can get this years holidays done. Actually Bush Junior was just a raving alcoholic rather than outright dumb. " ....in the words of father dougal maguire......ah come on now ted......he's fairly stupid...the grecians?.... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sanders wins are all narrow though, and in states that apportion delegates proportionally that's no good Where Hilary wins in places like New York and Caifornia (she's well ahead in their polls there) she tends to win comfortably and they've got lots of delegates Sanders will drag it out but the maths are worse for him than they were for Cruz. For sanders it was always about raising awareness in corruption in politics. Ie big money. He'll "drag it" as long as he's got a platform.... But let's not forget Clinton dragged it out all the way to California against Obama with very little chance of winning. I suspect Hillary will struggle more than people think, she's got terrible approval ratings, she's actually disliked massively by alot of democrats and absolutely hated by Republicans. And unlike sanders trump will dig up plenty of shit on her... Her biggest problem politically is her hawkishness with war!, we've yet to hear the redacted 28 pages of the 911 commission but the governor who has seen them has been pretty honest about its implications and then there's the ongoing FBI email investigation... I certainly don't think she'll be in for a easy stroll But look at her competition... even a turd sandwich can beat a giant douche . She couldn't beat an unknown black guy with a Muslim middle name!. She's only just scrapped through agaist a socialist?. The woman is not as electable as we might think over here You're ignoring the fact that the unknown black guy was handsome as fuck, had Tony Blair's ability to make you believe the future won't be like the past and was back by an awesome campaign team who never once let him be pictured with those dirty cigarettes in his mouth. When you put Obama next to Clinton or Trump he looks like fucking Roosevelt had a baby with Tony Blair (i.e electable) . That's easy to say now 8 years later??. It's not like America has never had a handsome black politican before is it or charismatic ones!. He beat Hillary fairly and squarely on one promise... Change! . I could be wrong but I really don't think she'll stroll it She won't stroll it but there's no stopping half minded voters who will fall for the gender card. Or the let's not vote for a lunatic card? Lunatic? He's just misunderstood ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() I'd say that Clitons financial services modernization act did more damage than Trump could do if he was trying. The unintended consequences of stupid people are like that. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They've a choice between the status quo of a career bureaucrat or a nut job successful businessman who is used to getting his way, who don't give a toss about offending anybody. I'd go for the nut job, might be just what the world needs, shaking up a bit." Was just watching on Newsnight about it earlier. It showed a few different polls which Clinton was in the lead on such as foreign policy, security, etc, however there was one poll in which Trump beat Clinton, and that was the poll on the economy. Crucially the economy is the one thing most important to American voters in this election. I think this presidential election could turn out to be very close one way or the other. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Perception is a dangerous illusion" Which is more pathetic - Hillary's track record or trumps hair? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If we vote to stay were mad and trump should get the job Old Clintons are part of the super rich American gang as are the bushes and also part of the illuminati and new world order! ! Call me mad,I know As trump is not! Boris on the other hand is great for us read on As the euro becomes part and then we will have 1 currency throughout the world i.e. Apple pay,contactless, soon there will be no need for money and trust me this will happen! All part of the masterplan that's if they don't wipe us out first or get us into these femer camps that their creating in America! Even today in the skies the chemtrails and contrails were quite visible today and will be again tomorrow if you look up to the skies! Wow all this for trump and Boris lol ![]() ![]() Go quietly when the men in white coats come. We both know they are illuminati and not doctors. No need to scream. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If we vote to stay were mad and trump should get the job Old Clintons are part of the super rich American gang as are the bushes and also part of the illuminati and new world order! ! Call me mad,I know As trump is not! Boris on the other hand is great for us read on As the euro becomes part and then we will have 1 currency throughout the world i.e. Apple pay,contactless, soon there will be no need for money and trust me this will happen! All part of the masterplan that's if they don't wipe us out first or get us into these femer camps that their creating in America! Even today in the skies the chemtrails and contrails were quite visible today and will be again tomorrow if you look up to the skies! Wow all this for trump and Boris lol ![]() ![]() wait a minute, Donald trump is Donald J. Trump His initials are therefore DJT DJT is three letters Three is the number sides on a triangle Donald Trump is illuminati confirmed | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If we vote to stay were mad and trump should get the job Old Clintons are part of the super rich American gang as are the bushes and also part of the illuminati and new world order! ! Call me mad,I know As trump is not! Boris on the other hand is great for us read on As the euro becomes part and then we will have 1 currency throughout the world i.e. Apple pay,contactless, soon there will be no need for money and trust me this will happen! All part of the masterplan that's if they don't wipe us out first or get us into these femer camps that their creating in America! Even today in the skies the chemtrails and contrails were quite visible today and will be again tomorrow if you look up to the skies! Wow all this for trump and Boris lol ![]() ![]() Illuminati don't exist ffs. The NWO definately do though. Or did. They were certainly a force to be reckoned with in WCW but ultimately ceased to have any power after Wrestlemania 18. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If we vote to stay were mad and trump should get the job Old Clintons are part of the super rich American gang as are the bushes and also part of the illuminati and new world order! ! Call me mad,I know As trump is not! Boris on the other hand is great for us read on As the euro becomes part and then we will have 1 currency throughout the world i.e. Apple pay,contactless, soon there will be no need for money and trust me this will happen! All part of the masterplan that's if they don't wipe us out first or get us into these femer camps that their creating in America! Even today in the skies the chemtrails and contrails were quite visible today and will be again tomorrow if you look up to the skies! Wow all this for trump and Boris lol ![]() ![]() But what if NWO is not kill?? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" She won't stroll it but there's no stopping half minded voters who will fall for the gender card. women are more likely to vote in an election then men..... so this comes along.... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_2gdTrh95jU if that is a republican "anti trump" ad played during the primaries.... imagine what the democrats will come up with.... ![]() ![]() ![]() Let's not forget that Obama had the support of highly influencial figures such as Puff Daddy who got people voting that usually don't turn out. It remains to be seen if he'll throw his support behind such a corporate puppet as Clinton with his 'vote or die' campaign: https://youtu.be/9pSh0VAVYn4 | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() ![]() ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top | ![]() |