
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
| Back to forum list |
| Back to The Lounge |
| Jump to newest |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Bookies only lose money on the favourites at 5000-1 the bookies were quids in. " true | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The bookies? Leicester were 5000-1 at the start of the season, and now they have to pay out quite a few million! Oh and well done to the Premier League winners 2016 they will be paying out very little very few have a bet on it . The bookies will make more out of it in free advertising than they pay out | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The bookies? Leicester were 5000-1 at the start of the season, and now they have to pay out quite a few million! Oh and well done to the Premier League winners 2016 ummmm...no | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Bookies only lose money on the favourites at 5000-1 the bookies were quids in. " True ...its a fallacy that they will lose money.....as they have millions backing Man u Man city and Chelski etc | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The bookies? Leicester were 5000-1 at the start of the season, and now they have to pay out quite a few million! Oh and well done to the Premier League winners 2016 Wish i had a Delorean to go back and put a few quid on the foxes | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Bookies only lose money on the favourites at 5000-1 the bookies were quids in. " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The bookies? Leicester were 5000-1 at the start of the season, and now they have to pay out quite a few million! Oh and well done to the Premier League winners 2016 Errrr if they pay out a few million thats nothung in comparison the the gazzilion they would have took on the market. Chelsea, man city etc would have been worse result. The bookies will be rubbing their hands tonite | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Oh and just to point out, 5000 x 500 is over 2 million... for ONE customer. Happy for the winners, spend wisely They often have a cap on maximum winnings. If there was a cap, the punters were stupid to put the whole lot on if the bet hadn't came off they would have lost more than necessary | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I doubt very much that any bookie will be happy having to pay out vast amounts for such a little backing. Yes they may have taken money for Chelsea/Arsenal/Liverpool etc, but their odds were very low, nothing like the 5000-1 they are now paying out. " You really aren't getting this are you? 2,000,000 paid out on a 5000-1 bet wis worth 10x that in advertising and is a hell of a lot cheaper than the fifty or more millions they would have paid out if the big four had won | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |