FabSwingers.com forum: Ethics & Morals

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

You are in Berlin, 1933. Somehow, you find yourself in a position where you can effortlessly steal Hitler's wallet.

This theft will not affect Hitler's rise to power, the nature of WW2, or the Holocaust. There is no important identification in the wallet, but the act will cost Hitler forty Reichsmarks and completely ruin his evening.

You do not need the money. The odds that you will be caught committing this act are less than 2 percent.

Do You Steal Hitler's Wallet?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *iewMan
Forum Mod
over a year ago

Angus & Findhorn

No.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Nope..

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

No I wouldnt

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Nope cause thats one thing i aint xx

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Yes I would

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I hope you've got the analysis for the answers Tra.......

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

I think i've got something to compare it to. depends on who answers it and how many

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Whats the moral incentive then ?...

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Given that it will not bring about his downfall, then the answer is no.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

no im not a thief

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *nvictusMan
over a year ago

Beeston

I would hand it in or ask if anyone owned it, as I have done in the past.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Im still stealing it.

My answer means nothing unless you take into account my intention.

Im stealing it.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I'd take it and put it in Himler's pocket. Then I'd tell Adolf his right hand man is not trustworthy.

Then I'd sit back and watch the fireworks.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

See ........ motivation is everything ....

I wuv you Jack xx

But i've already stolen it .......so touch boobie doos

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Im still stealing it.

My answer means nothing unless you take into account my intention.

Im stealing it. "

hahaha.thats very true ....descriptive rather than definitive....

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Yes I'd steal it but knowing me I'd be caught and shot via firing squad. It like this week someone found pictures of Himmler when he had just died. The auction house say they will go for thousands.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

There's money in anything Nazi x

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

My moral imperative would be the most important factor in my decision...

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I feel that by taking it I'd have one on this horrible evil little man that talks nonsence. And even in 1933 he was spouting off about anti semitism. So I'd be within my rights.

Well that's my defence in court.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The title of this thread is ethics and morals.

Most people say they are not theives but if they examine themselves closely they have stolen something in their adult life and felt guiltless about it.

I'd say decsions are made by taking all factors into account. All possibilities. We can't just say 'I am not a theif' as if our own ego was all that mattered.

We are obliged morally not to take the wallet IF we believe the broadly Christian value of 'thou shalt not steal' to be a dictum that should never be broken. But there HAS to be times when we break it. If I had to steal a shovel to get into a burning house to save someone I'd steal the shovel. There are times in all our lives when we have to make instant decisions that go against our beliefs.

Some people might answer that we are ethically required to steal the wallet just to give the bastard some pain .. a little shadenfruede for the theif perhaps. However we have been told that the stealing of the wallet will not change the path of history.

If I am in my own time e.g. Berlin 1933. I cannot possible forsee Hitlers rise to power and the subsequent war of 1939 and all the atrocities. In this case my answer is NO. I have no reason to steal the wallet. I have no reason to spoil his night. I would act according to the laws and mores of the time and place i am in.

If I am in 2011 and travel back to 1933. I of course do have knowledge of Hitler.WW2 and the holocaust. If I have a time machine then I WOULD steal the wallet as I am aware of the amazing value of it in the future.

Nothing will change if I take the wallet. Tra said so. But things will change for me here. I harm no one from 1933. I have a slim chance of being caught. I bring the wallet back to the future and sell it on E bay. I know there is no identification but with a few pics I take when I go back in time ( oh shit I have a modern camera ) someone sort that idea for me.....

Hmmmm okay I haven't worked out the value of it yet but the sheer satisfaction of taking the wallet knowing no one is harmed and im not caught is too much to say no to.

Surely theft became wrong as it causes untold harm to those stolen from. Hitler is only having a lousy night and knowing what he does in years to come I don't feel bad about his pain. I don't stand to save anyone .....so Yeah .

My answer is .... if im from 2011 YES I'd steal Hitlers wallet.

Before the 'holier than thou brigade' start on me... That doesn't mean i'd steal other things.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

In which case I'll rephrase the question:

With the aid of a time machine you leave the present day and find yourself in Berlin, 1933. Somehow, you find yourself in a position where you can effortlessly steal Hitler's wallet.

You do not need the money. The odds that you will be caught committing this act are less than 2 percent.

Do You Steal Hitler's Wallet?

Are you morally obligated to do so?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

No im not morally obligated to steal anything.

Yes i'd steal his wallet. Purely for personal gain.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"In which case I'll rephrase the question:

With the aid of a time machine you leave the present day and find yourself in Berlin, 1933. Somehow, you find yourself in a position where you can effortlessly steal Hitler's wallet.

You do not need the money. The odds that you will be caught committing this act are less than 2 percent.

Do You Steal Hitler's Wallet?

Are you morally obligated to do so?"

Nope..

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"The title of this thread is ethics and morals.

Most people say they are not theives but if they examine themselves closely they have stolen something in their adult life and felt guiltless about it.

I'd say decsions are made by taking all factors into account. All possibilities. We can't just say 'I am not a theif' as if our own ego was all that mattered.

Hmmmm okay I haven't worked out the value of it yet but the sheer satisfaction of taking the wallet knowing no one is harmed and im not caught is too much to say no to.

My answer is .... if im from 2011 YES I'd steal Hitlers wallet.

Before the 'holier than thou brigade' start on me... That doesn't mean i'd steal other things. "

Perfectly sensible post ...I like it ..

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *agman n angelCouple
over a year ago

benidorm

oh yes

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

What is significant about the 40 Reichmarks?

What or who was he going to pay for with it, that he couldn't do if I pinched his money?

Can't be arsed to google what he was up to in 1933

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Yes and I'd still steal it for my own gain

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"oh yes"

And the moral incentive is ?...

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

How would stealing his wallet completely ruin that evening for him?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ensualfire88Man
over a year ago

Edinburgh

Presumably if I've travelled in a time machine back to 1933 I would know all about the 2nd world war holocaust etc.

In which case I would not steal his wallet.

I would shoot him in the head.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"How would stealing his wallet completely ruin that evening for him? "

Because he'd have a condom in his wallet and if I stole it would not be able to have his way. But he did only have one ball wonders if he could still get up with?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Presumably if I've travelled in a time machine back to 1933 I would know all about the 2nd world war holocaust etc.

In which case I would not steal his wallet.

I would shoot him in the head."

This man speaks sense and 61 million people would not have perished through the war.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *agman n angelCouple
over a year ago

benidorm

"oh yes

And the moral incentive is ?..."

morals? what are they some kind of mushroom ?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"oh yes

And the moral incentive is ?...

morals? what are they some kind of mushroom ?"

Fungi...animal tranquility and Faustian decay..and pictures of malice ....dunno you tell me ..

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *agman n angelCouple
over a year ago

benidorm

dunno either but who is this fun guy you mentioned?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"Whats the moral incentive then ?..."

The incentive was in the question..The Opportunity to ruin Hitler's night..nothing else.

Given what you know what will be coming in the future and the fact that you can't change the course of history the only direct thing you can do to Hitler is piss him off.for a couple of hours. there is very little or no monetary gain just the chance to upset him. Given what I know comes later I'm hardly likely to NOT steal the wallet because I consider stealing morally wrong. I'd take it.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I would choose not to steal the wallet because his bad mood could translate to something much worse for those around him and I would not want to be resposible for that.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I would choose not to steal the wallet because his bad mood could translate to something much worse for those around him and I would not want to be resposible for that."

I don't remember reading about the night where he extracted teeth with pliers cos someone stole his wallet so I consider it safe to nick it ..... Im NICKING it......

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *iamondsmiles.Woman
over a year ago

little house on the praire

But would it piss him off for a couple of hours. What has he lost. You say no identification so i assume that means no personal photos and letters ect. So all he has lost seems to be a wallet with maybe some insignficant things in it

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I would choose not to steal the wallet because his bad mood could translate to something much worse for those around him and I would not want to be resposible for that.

I don't remember reading about the night where he extracted teeth with pliers cos someone stole his wallet so I consider it safe to nick it ..... Im NICKING it......"

Good for you, but if he made the waiters family disappear or something in a fit of pique, thats the sort of thing I mean.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I would choose not to steal the wallet because his bad mood could translate to something much worse for those around him and I would not want to be resposible for that.

I don't remember reading about the night where he extracted teeth with pliers cos someone stole his wallet so I consider it safe to nick it ..... Im NICKING it......

Good for you, but if he made the waiters family disappear or something in a fit of pique, thats the sort of thing I mean.

What Bloody Waiters ?? Which story did you read ??

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ensualfire88Man
over a year ago

Edinburgh

Telegram to Stephen Hawking and those in control at Cern.

'Have discovered parallel universe. Like ours, but different.'

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *orestersCouple
over a year ago

The Forest

Given the precise parameters of the scenario, I would steal his wallet. If nothing else was going to change in the future because of it, then just the chance to give him a small amount of punishment for what he was going to do in his future would be worth it.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

i wouldnt steal his wallet, just the contents of it

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"Given the precise parameters of the scenario, I would steal his wallet. If nothing else was going to change in the future because of it, then just the chance to give him a small amount of punishment for what he was going to do in his future would be worth it."

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

i wouldnt steal it... i would take it out and place it somewhere he would find it,like his sock drawer, maybe make him think he was going mad

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *he_original_poloWoman
over a year ago

a Primark shoebox in Leicester

I am wondering why it would suddenly cross my mind to steal a wallet when steeling wallets is not something which usually crosses my mind.

That aside… for every action there is a consequence. What is the consequence of Hitler being pissed off that evening? What if as a result of being pissed off now, when in our history of that moment in time he wasn’t pissed off before, he makes a different decision? What if as a direct result (or indirect result) of his altered mood, later someone dies who hadn’t died in our history or just doesn’t meet someone they were destined to meet? What if we have just indirectly caused the premature death of the grandfather of the person who eventually finds the cure for cancer?

What if the small amount of money in the wallet was going to be used to buy some flowers. The florist needed just a few more marks to be able to afford to buy a train ticket for her son, who was in danger of being arrested as a political enemy. As a result of steeling the wallet Hitler now can’t buy the flowers and is too pissed off to ask to borrow the money. The florist can’t help her son to escape that night and the next day he is arrested… later being tortured to death. What of the florist’s son was the great grandfather of the person who invented the time machine?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Well then I wouldn't have had a time machine , wouldn't have gone back in time and wouldn't have stolen the wallet. So all's well.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *he_original_poloWoman
over a year ago

a Primark shoebox in Leicester

"Well then I wouldn't have had a time machine , wouldn't have gone back in time and wouldn't have stolen the wallet. So all's well. "

But you would have the time machine to get there, that has already been invented in your history.... you probably wouldn't have it to get back though, as you would now be in a new history. You'd be stuck in 1933 in Germany.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Nope. If I had the time machine before history was altered. I'd nick his wallet and then come back in the machine before he noticed the wallet had gone.

Im back in 2011 , he sees the wallet gone. Murders the inventor of the time machine.

It's at this point that I can't explain how I am in posession of a time machine that no one invented.

That really doesn't matter. I have the wallet and im safe. Doesn't matter who he kills - all the moralisers don't even care who is killed in their street let alone an assoc. of Hitler some 80 years ago.

Never mind parallel universes i'm now imagining a helix ...

Change of answer.

NO IM NOT A THEIF. ( so much easier )

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

By linking the inventor of the time machine to the act committed by the time travller you have created a paradox:

The crime of the theft of hitler's wallet prevent the florist's son from escaping Nazi Germany and he perishes, thus not fathering the father of the inventor of the time machine, which in turn prevents the time machine from ever being invented which means nobody ever went back in time to steal Hitler's wallet, which leaves the florist's son with enough funds to escape Nazi Germany to go on and father the father of the inventor of the time machine.

This is why time travel will never be possible. Now, or at any time in the past.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ax the gentle GiantMan
over a year ago

birmingham

not a chance theft is theft be honest its so much better

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

there never was a florist..or a gun..or hitler in person..or himmler..the parameters of the question are set. if it says all that will happen is hitler will get pissed off..that's all that happens.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Presumably if I've travelled in a time machine back to 1933 I would know all about the 2nd world war holocaust etc.

In which case I would not steal his wallet.

I would shoot him in the head.

This man speaks sense and 61 million people would not have perished through the war. "

Changing history can be dangerous.

Schindler saved 6,000 Jews from extermination. Today, the direct descendants from those 6,000 people number 36,000.

Multiply 61 million people by the same factor and there would be an extra 360 million people in the world today - one of which may have risen to power and pressed the nuclear button.

Very dangerous to play with history.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ensualfire88Man
over a year ago

Edinburgh

So how do you explain the time machine that's turned up in my garage overnight?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"So how do you explain the time machine that's turned up in my garage overnight?"

It's not a time machine. It's either a car or a lawn mower!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

Post new Message to Thread