FabSwingers.com forum: I hate the daily mail

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

but sometimes credit where its due.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3506205/Hoarder-87-FINALLY-evicted-home-lived-61-years-filled-dolls-toys-ruled-fire-hazard.html

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *endrix30Man
over a year ago

dudley

I hate the daily mail too its obnoxious.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I hate nothing that's standard ,standard

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

I think i meant for peeps to read the article

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I hate it too - so I won't read it

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I think all newspapers are always full of shit

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I think all newspapers are always full of shit"

short of loo roll?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *rightonsteveMan
over a year ago

Brighton - even Hove!

Read it once. That's enough. I won't read it again.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

sad that. her house never caught fire her whole entire life but they're chucking her out in case it does.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I still just hate the daily mail, and am happy to carry on my online guardian subscription.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *iss_tressWoman
over a year ago

London

Love the Daily Mail. Where else can I find fodder to feed my righteous indignation?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *rincesscaracoupleCouple
over a year ago

Saltburn

Ha newspapers tell us about it!!!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I thought the only news they covered was the Kardashians?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *eavenNhellCouple
over a year ago

carrbrook stalybridge

"I thought the only news they covered was the Kardashians?"
or in the case of the Express the royals and house prices

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *rincesscaracoupleCouple
over a year ago

Saltburn

They use interesting methods to get their stories though.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

to be honest I truly wish the bailiffs that took crowbars to this old lady get made homeless and the judge that sighed the eviction warrant gets burnt to death they are the scum of the earth

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ENGUYMan
over a year ago

Hull

I have read the Daily Mail for the past 40 years. I know lots of people like to slag it off but it is no worse or better than any other paper.

Each one has its plus and minus points. I read it for news articles and for some of its features and can see how biased it can often be in relation to certain issues.

However, a lot of their columnists and reporters regularly win Annual Awards within the newspaper industry, much more than other papers, so it must have some credibility after all amongst its peers!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *rightonsteveMan
over a year ago

Brighton - even Hove!

"I have read the Daily Mail for the past 40 years. I know lots of people like to slag it off but it is no worse or better than any other paper.

Each one has its plus and minus points. I read it for news articles and for some of its features and can see how biased it can often be in relation to certain issues.

However, a lot of their columnists and reporters regularly win Annual Awards within the newspaper industry, much more than other papers, so it must have some credibility after all amongst its peers!"

Compare the writing style on the same story to that offered by The Telegraph and see which is less biased and more informative.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"sad that. her house never caught fire her whole entire life but they're chucking her out in case it does.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ENGUYMan
over a year ago

Hull

"I have read the Daily Mail for the past 40 years. I know lots of people like to slag it off but it is no worse or better than any other paper.

Each one has its plus and minus points. I read it for news articles and for some of its features and can see how biased it can often be in relation to certain issues.

However, a lot of their columnists and reporters regularly win Annual Awards within the newspaper industry, much more than other papers, so it must have some credibility after all amongst its peers!

Compare the writing style on the same story to that offered by The Telegraph and see which is less biased and more informative. "

How each newspaper is read and viewed is subjective and every person views different papers in different ways.

If the Telegraph is your preferred paper, that's your choice; in turn I wouldn't wish to suggest it is better or worse than my choice. It is down to personal opinion.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ophieslutTV/TS
over a year ago

Central

G utter trash and filth.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Daily FAIL. Id be embarrassed to be seen with anyone who was reading it.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Just like no-one votes conservative, no-one reads the mail...

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *iamondjoeMan
over a year ago

Glastonbury

"Just like no-one votes conservative, no-one reads the mail...

I think you'll find that's a minority of the country in both cases.

Just because it's popular doesn't make it right

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Just like no-one votes conservative, no-one reads the mail...

I think you'll find that's a minority of the country in both cases.

Just because it's popular doesn't make it right

Which way did the majority vote ?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *iamondjoeMan
over a year ago

Glastonbury

"Just like no-one votes conservative, no-one reads the mail...

I think you'll find that's a minority of the country in both cases.

Just because it's popular doesn't make it right

Which way did the majority vote ?"

A majority of the electorate did not vote for the Conservatives, did they?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Just like no-one votes conservative, no-one reads the mail...

I think you'll find that's a minority of the country in both cases.

Just because it's popular doesn't make it right

Are you saying the minority voted conservative, yet they won the last General election? How so?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *iamondjoeMan
over a year ago

Glastonbury

"Just like no-one votes conservative, no-one reads the mail...

I think you'll find that's a minority of the country in both cases.

Just because it's popular doesn't make it right

Are you saying the minority voted conservative, yet they won the last General election? How so?"

The Conservatives were elected to g'ment with

331 seats out of 650

To Labour's 232 MPs

This disguises that nationally, the Conservatives received 11.3m votes to Labour's 9.3m votes.

That gave the Conservatives 36% of the popular vote and a lead of more than 100 MPs over Labour.

There are 47.3m people registered to vote in the UK.

A ringing endorsement?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Just like no-one votes conservative, no-one reads the mail...

I think you'll find that's a minority of the country in both cases.

Just because it's popular doesn't make it right

Are you saying the minority voted conservative, yet they won the last General election? How so?

The Conservatives were elected to g'ment with

331 seats out of 650

To Labour's 232 MPs

This disguises that nationally, the Conservatives received 11.3m votes to Labour's 9.3m votes.

That gave the Conservatives 36% of the popular vote and a lead of more than 100 MPs over Labour.

There are 47.3m people registered to vote in the UK.

A ringing endorsement?"

Are conservative voters the minority, as you claim?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *its_n_piecesCouple
over a year ago

the majority of eligable voters did not vote conservative .... and that's an irrefutable fact kids

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *iamondjoeMan
over a year ago

Glastonbury

"Just like no-one votes conservative, no-one reads the mail...

I think you'll find that's a minority of the country in both cases.

Just because it's popular doesn't make it right

Are you saying the minority voted conservative, yet they won the last General election? How so?

The Conservatives were elected to g'ment with

331 seats out of 650

To Labour's 232 MPs

This disguises that nationally, the Conservatives received 11.3m votes to Labour's 9.3m votes.

That gave the Conservatives 36% of the popular vote and a lead of more than 100 MPs over Labour.

There are 47.3m people registered to vote in the UK.

A ringing endorsement?

Are conservative voters the minority, as you claim?"

Clearly!

11.3m votes out of an electorate of 47.3m?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *razedcatMan
over a year ago

London / Herts

The Conservatives were elected to g'ment with

331 seats out of 650

To Labour's 232 MPs

This disguises that nationally, the Conservatives received 11.3m votes to Labour's 9.3m votes.

That gave the Conservatives 36% of the popular vote and a lead of more than 100 MPs over Labour.

There are 47.3m people registered to vote in the UK.

A ringing endorsement?"

Good ol' First Past the Post!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I'm googling high and low, but i can't find anything that backs up your claim that daily mail readers are in the minority of newspaper readers either?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *iamondjoeMan
over a year ago

Glastonbury

"I'm googling high and low, but i can't find anything that backs up your claim that daily mail readers are in the minority of newspaper readers either? "

*sighs*

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Just like no-one votes conservative, no-one reads the mail...

I think you'll find that's a minority of the country in both cases.

Just because it's popular doesn't make it right

Are you saying the minority voted conservative, yet they won the last General election? How so?

The Conservatives were elected to g'ment with

331 seats out of 650

To Labour's 232 MPs

This disguises that nationally, the Conservatives received 11.3m votes to Labour's 9.3m votes.

That gave the Conservatives 36% of the popular vote and a lead of more than 100 MPs over Labour.

There are 47.3m people registered to vote in the UK.

A ringing endorsement?

Are conservative voters the minority, as you claim?

Clearly!

11.3m votes out of an electorate of 47.3m?"

Ok so who did the majority vote for?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I'm googling high and low, but i can't find anything that backs up your claim that daily mail readers are in the minority of newspaper readers either?

*i made it up*"

I know mate, i know..

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *its_n_piecesCouple
over a year ago

"Just like no-one votes conservative, no-one reads the mail...

I think you'll find that's a minority of the country in both cases.

Just because it's popular doesn't make it right

Are you saying the minority voted conservative, yet they won the last General election? How so?

The Conservatives were elected to g'ment with

331 seats out of 650

To Labour's 232 MPs

This disguises that nationally, the Conservatives received 11.3m votes to Labour's 9.3m votes.

That gave the Conservatives 36% of the popular vote and a lead of more than 100 MPs over Labour.

There are 47.3m people registered to vote in the UK.

A ringing endorsement?

Are conservative voters the minority, as you claim?

Clearly!

11.3m votes out of an electorate of 47.3m?

Ok so who did the majority vote for?"

not the conservatives as previously proved beyond doubt

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *iamondjoeMan
over a year ago

Glastonbury

"I'm googling high and low, but i can't find anything that backs up your claim that daily mail readers are in the minority of newspaper readers either?

*sighs*"

The Sun 1,787,096

Daily Mail 1,589,471

Metro 1,348,033

Evening Standard 898,407

Daily Mirror 809,147

Daily Telegraph 472,033

Daily Star 470,369

Daily Express 408,700

The Times 404,155

i 271,859

Financial Times 198,237

Daily Record 176,892

The Guardian 164,163

City A.M. 97,259

The Independent 55,193

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_newspapers_in_the_United_Kingdom_by_circulation#2010_to_present

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *llen n SebbCouple
over a year ago

Walkinstown

"G utter trash and filth. "

Enough about swingers, give us your opinion on the Daily Mail.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *iamondjoeMan
over a year ago

Glastonbury

"Just like no-one votes conservative, no-one reads the mail...

I think you'll find that's a minority of the country in both cases.

Just because it's popular doesn't make it right

Are you saying the minority voted conservative, yet they won the last General election? How so?

The Conservatives were elected to g'ment with

331 seats out of 650

To Labour's 232 MPs

This disguises that nationally, the Conservatives received 11.3m votes to Labour's 9.3m votes.

That gave the Conservatives 36% of the popular vote and a lead of more than 100 MPs over Labour.

There are 47.3m people registered to vote in the UK.

A ringing endorsement?

Are conservative voters the minority, as you claim?

Clearly!

11.3m votes out of an electorate of 47.3m?

Ok so who did the majority vote for?"

NOT the Conservatives lol

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I'm googling high and low, but i can't find anything that backs up your claim that daily mail readers are in the minority of newspaper readers either?

*sighs*

The Sun 1,787,096

Daily Mail 1,589,471

Metro 1,348,033

Evening Standard 898,407

Daily Mirror 809,147

Daily Telegraph 472,033

Daily Star 470,369

Daily Express 408,700

The Times 404,155

i 271,859

Financial Times 198,237

Daily Record 176,892

The Guardian 164,163

City A.M. 97,259

The Independent 55,193

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_newspapers_in_the_United_Kingdom_by_circulation#2010_to_present"

Oh, but you said they were in the minority?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Just like no-one votes conservative, no-one reads the mail...

I think you'll find that's a minority of the country in both cases.

Just because it's popular doesn't make it right

Are you saying the minority voted conservative, yet they won the last General election? How so?

The Conservatives were elected to g'ment with

331 seats out of 650

To Labour's 232 MPs

This disguises that nationally, the Conservatives received 11.3m votes to Labour's 9.3m votes.

That gave the Conservatives 36% of the popular vote and a lead of more than 100 MPs over Labour.

There are 47.3m people registered to vote in the UK.

A ringing endorsement?

Are conservative voters the minority, as you claim?

Clearly!

11.3m votes out of an electorate of 47.3m?

Ok so who did the majority vote for?

NOT the Conservatives lol"

So who?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I think you're just making it up as you go along.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

You'll be telling me the minority buy Fords next.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *iamondjoeMan
over a year ago

Glastonbury

LOL

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Never read it but as I'm continually accused of being a Mail reader on here due to my support for a brexit in the EU referendum think it's time I tried it

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *iamondjoeMan
over a year ago

Glastonbury

Heart Of Stone

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JjynIAeh1tU

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *iamondjoeMan
over a year ago

Glastonbury

"Never read it but as I'm continually accused of being a Mail reader on here due to my support for a brexit in the EU referendum think it's time I tried it

When travelling abroad I always purchase a copy.

First, I want something to keep my bloody pressure up - I don't want to be too relaxed.

Secondly, I have a fantasy that if I'm carrying a copy, Customs Officers will be less interested in me.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

And the little old lady was forgotten about

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Never read it but as I'm continually accused of being a Mail reader on here due to my support for a brexit in the EU referendum think it's time I tried it

When travelling abroad I always purchase a copy.

First, I want something to keep my bloody pressure up - I don't want to be too relaxed.

Secondly, I have a fantasy that if I'm carrying a copy, Customs Officers will be less interested in me.

I have noticed that they've handed out free copies on a couple of flights I've been on. That explains it then

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *iamondjoeMan
over a year ago

Glastonbury

"And the little old lady was forgotten about

Ah. Tbf, she does look at bit mental health.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *its_n_piecesCouple
over a year ago

"I have noticed that they've handed out free copies on a couple of flights I've been on. "

no, they're called sick bags

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"And the little old lady was forgotten about

Ah. Tbf, she does look at bit mental health. "

yes she has mental heath problems but she never deserved being man handled like she was and her stuff being trashed as it was

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"And the little old lady was forgotten about

Ah. Tbf, she does look at bit mental health.

yes she has mental heath problems but she never deserved being man handled like she was and her stuff being trashed as it was "

abuse and being forced to do things will make her mental health worse really.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *iamondjoeMan
over a year ago

Glastonbury

"And the little old lady was forgotten about

Ah. Tbf, she does look at bit mental health.

yes she has mental heath problems but she never deserved being man handled like she was and her stuff being trashed as it was

abuse and being forced to do things will make her mental health worse really."

But this is The Daily Mail.

You saw some pictures of a frail old lady and her life's work being trashed...

It's not like the Council/bailiffs just did this for fun or without warning.

There would have been a process.

Not saying I agree with it but that's lost in the article.

Daily Mail = prurience served as news

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"And the little old lady was forgotten about

Ah. Tbf, she does look at bit mental health.

yes she has mental heath problems but she never deserved being man handled like she was and her stuff being trashed as it was

abuse and being forced to do things will make her mental health worse really.

But this is The Daily Mail.

You saw some pictures of a frail old lady and her life's work being trashed...

It's not like the Council/bailiffs just did this for fun or without warning.

There would have been a process.

Not saying I agree with it but that's lost in the article.

Daily Mail = prurience served as news "

i saw it on my facebook earlier today, from sources that this site cannot name because they are not shabby news sites.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"And the little old lady was forgotten about

Ah. Tbf, she does look at bit mental health.

yes she has mental heath problems but she never deserved being man handled like she was and her stuff being trashed as it was

abuse and being forced to do things will make her mental health worse really.

But this is The Daily Mail.

You saw some pictures of a frail old lady and her life's work being trashed...

It's not like the Council/bailiffs just did this for fun or without warning.

There would have been a process.

Not saying I agree with it but that's lost in the article.

Daily Mail = prurience served as news "

no I saw some video of a frail old lady being attacked by bailiffs with crow bars while the police looked on and did nothing

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"And the little old lady was forgotten about

Ah. Tbf, she does look at bit mental health.

yes she has mental heath problems but she never deserved being man handled like she was and her stuff being trashed as it was

abuse and being forced to do things will make her mental health worse really.

But this is The Daily Mail.

You saw some pictures of a frail old lady and her life's work being trashed...

It's not like the Council/bailiffs just did this for fun or without warning.

There would have been a process.

Not saying I agree with it but that's lost in the article.

Daily Mail = prurience served as news

i saw it on my facebook earlier today, from sources that this site cannot name because they are not shabby news sites."

Hmm yeah it was the only source i felt i could post a link for

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *iamondjoeMan
over a year ago

Glastonbury

"i saw it on my facebook earlier today, from sources that this site cannot name because they are not shabby news sites."

And The Mail is not shabby?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"i saw it on my facebook earlier today, from sources that this site cannot name because they are not shabby news sites.

And The Mail is not shabby?"

Going to have mine ironed

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"i saw it on my facebook earlier today, from sources that this site cannot name because they are not shabby news sites.

And The Mail is not shabby?"

i didn't read about this in the daily mail. nothing on my facebook posts that sort of stuff.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"And the little old lady was forgotten about

Ah. Tbf, she does look at bit mental health.

yes she has mental heath problems but she never deserved being man handled like she was and her stuff being trashed as it was

abuse and being forced to do things will make her mental health worse really.

But this is The Daily Mail.

You saw some pictures of a frail old lady and her life's work being trashed...

It's not like the Council/bailiffs just did this for fun or without warning.

There would have been a process.

Not saying I agree with it but that's lost in the article.

Daily Mail = prurience served as news

i saw it on my facebook earlier today, from sources that this site cannot name because they are not shabby news sites.

Hmm yeah it was the only source i felt i could post a link for

it's ok, don't feel bad lol. but yeah usually i won't generate money for that newsgroup.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *iamondjoeMan
over a year ago

Glastonbury

"i saw it on my facebook earlier today, from sources that this site cannot name because they are not shabby news sites.

And The Mail is not shabby?

i didn't read about this in the daily mail. nothing on my facebook posts that sort of stuff."

I'm not having a pop.

It's one of those odd features of this site that you can quote from The Sun or The Daily Mail but not from the Organisation for National Statistics, for instance.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"i saw it on my facebook earlier today, from sources that this site cannot name because they are not shabby news sites.

And The Mail is not shabby?

i didn't read about this in the daily mail. nothing on my facebook posts that sort of stuff.

I'm not having a pop.

It's one of those odd features of this site that you can quote from The Sun or The Daily Mail but not from the Organisation for National Statistics, for instance.

it's the only thing i get banned for, and that's posting quality links.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"i saw it on my facebook earlier today, from sources that this site cannot name because they are not shabby news sites.

And The Mail is not shabby?

i didn't read about this in the daily mail. nothing on my facebook posts that sort of stuff.

I'm not having a pop.

It's one of those odd features of this site that you can quote from The Sun or The Daily Mail but not from the Organisation for National Statistics, for instance.

it's the only thing i get banned for, and that's posting quality links.

I considered it but thought the thread would be closed and the old ladys story untold.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"i saw it on my facebook earlier today, from sources that this site cannot name because they are not shabby news sites.

And The Mail is not shabby?

i didn't read about this in the daily mail. nothing on my facebook posts that sort of stuff.

I'm not having a pop.

It's one of those odd features of this site that you can quote from The Sun or The Daily Mail but not from the Organisation for National Statistics, for instance.

it's the only thing i get banned for, and that's posting quality links.

I considered it but thought the thread would be closed and the old ladys story untold.

yeah good idea, and you would get banned from posting for a while.

it is messed up though, that a government that is supposed to be against big government and regulations has no problem evicting people out of their own homes using regulations.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"i saw it on my facebook earlier today, from sources that this site cannot name because they are not shabby news sites.

And The Mail is not shabby?

i didn't read about this in the daily mail. nothing on my facebook posts that sort of stuff.

I'm not having a pop.

It's one of those odd features of this site that you can quote from The Sun or The Daily Mail but not from the Organisation for National Statistics, for instance.

it's the only thing i get banned for, and that's posting quality links.

I considered it but thought the thread would be closed and the old ladys story untold.

yeah good idea, and you would get banned from posting for a while.

it is messed up though, that a government that is supposed to be against big government and regulations has no problem evicting people out of their own homes using regulations."

yeah. Shes 87 ffs

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"i saw it on my facebook earlier today, from sources that this site cannot name because they are not shabby news sites.

And The Mail is not shabby?

i didn't read about this in the daily mail. nothing on my facebook posts that sort of stuff.

I'm not having a pop.

It's one of those odd features of this site that you can quote from The Sun or The Daily Mail but not from the Organisation for National Statistics, for instance.

it's the only thing i get banned for, and that's posting quality links.

I considered it but thought the thread would be closed and the old ladys story untold.

yeah good idea, and you would get banned from posting for a while.

it is messed up though, that a government that is supposed to be against big government and regulations has no problem evicting people out of their own homes using regulations.

yeah. Shes 87 ffs

and it's really cold right now.

i heard she had signed the right to buy the property, at a discount after paying rent for all those years. and this is when the problems started.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I hate the daily grind but I'm ok now its easter luckily I don't have any eggs other than hens

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *entaur_UKMan
over a year ago

Cannock

All these lefty socialists who hate the daily mail loved it when the Mail printed the exclusive David Cameron pigs head story. You folks really need to make your minds up.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"All these lefty socialists who hate the daily mail loved it when the Mail printed the exclusive David Cameron pigs head story. You folks really need to make your minds up.

All?

Most people didn't give a shit.

Charlie Brooker even predicted it.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *uke olovingmanMan
over a year ago

Gravesend

So do I

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *endrix30Man
over a year ago

dudley

[Removed by poster at 29/03/16 04:57:11]

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *endrix30Man
over a year ago

dudley

The columnists at the mail obviously have the intellectual capacity of an Amoeba, its readers are not far behind.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The Mail were supporters of Hitler and Nazism before the war and judging by its contents today they have returned to those beliefs.

I only look at the website to see what the enemy think and to troll the forums

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"The columnists at the mail obviously have the intellectual capacity of an Amoeba, its readers are not far behind. "

What do you read Einstein?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *astard and goodgirlCouple
over a year ago

Near Exeter

Just don't read it then

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Didn't read that article. I won't read the daily fail.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

She can move back in if she stops hoarding.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *endrix30Man
over a year ago

dudley

"The columnists at the mail obviously have the intellectual capacity of an Amoeba, its readers are not far behind.

What do you read Einstein?"
Yes anything scientific. Whatabout you?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

So before you read this one article did you read the daily mail often.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"The columnists at the mail obviously have the intellectual capacity of an Amoeba, its readers are not far behind.

What do you read Einstein? Yes anything scientific. Whatabout you?"

I said what do you read Einstein not what do you read, Einstein?

Me, nothing in particular but as I mentioned earlier, the way some people on here feel about the Mail might be good enough reason to give it a try

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

Post new Message to Thread