Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
![]() | Back to forum list |
![]() | Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest | ![]() |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Profiles that are ritten with paw grammer and spelling misstakes is a rite turn off. It only takes a few seconds to use a spell checker. Are we being harsh or does anyone else agree?" How come you have 'sum fun' written on your profile? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Profiles that are ritten with paw grammer and spelling misstakes is a rite turn off. It only takes a few seconds to use a spell checker. Are we being harsh or does anyone else agree? How come you have 'sum fun' written on your profile?" Perhaps they enjoy mathematical conundrums? Anyway, they haven't asked for their profile to be judged. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Profiles that are ritten with paw grammer and spelling misstakes is a rite turn off. It only takes a few seconds to use a spell checker. Are we being harsh or does anyone else agree? How come you have 'sum fun' written on your profile?" i think hes taking the pee as op thread is all bad grammer | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Profiles that are ritten with paw grammer and spelling misstakes is a rite turn off. It only takes a few seconds to use a spell checker. Are we being harsh or does anyone else agree? How come you have 'sum fun' written on your profile? Perhaps they enjoy mathematical conundrums? Anyway, they haven't asked for their profile to be judged." I wasn't judging I was asking a straight forward question to them not you. ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Profiles that are ritten with paw grammer and spelling misstakes is a rite turn off. It only takes a few seconds to use a spell checker. Are we being harsh or does anyone else agree? How come you have 'sum fun' written on your profile? Perhaps they enjoy mathematical conundrums? Anyway, they haven't asked for their profile to be judged. I wasn't judging I was asking a straight forward question to them not you. ![]() You're not supposed to comment on a specific profile unless invited to. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Profiles that are ritten with paw grammer and spelling misstakes is a rite turn off. It only takes a few seconds to use a spell checker. Are we being harsh or does anyone else agree? How come you have 'sum fun' written on your profile? Perhaps they enjoy mathematical conundrums? Anyway, they haven't asked for their profile to be judged. I wasn't judging I was asking a straight forward question to them not you. ![]() you mentioned something that was written on their profile, but ignored their question, and its not their profile that is in question, if you follow? ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Profiles that are ritten with paw grammer and spelling misstakes is a rite turn off. It only takes a few seconds to use a spell checker. Are we being harsh or does anyone else agree?" As a trained Proofreader, I never use or even recommend using a Spell Checker. They are invariably at least 12 months out of date from reality, plus more often than not, are biased towards American English, and often the correct spelling of the word on the associated context can be incorrect. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is this tongue in cheek?" ![]() ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Profiles that are ritten with paw grammer and spelling misstakes is a rite turn off. It only takes a few seconds to use a spell checker. Are we being harsh or does anyone else agree?" ? Have you made deliberate mistakes to make your point? And there is no spell checker on a phone. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Profiles that are ritten with paw grammer and spelling misstakes is a rite turn off. It only takes a few seconds to use a spell checker. Are we being harsh or does anyone else agree? How come you have 'sum fun' written on your profile? Perhaps they enjoy mathematical conundrums? Anyway, they haven't asked for their profile to be judged. I wasn't judging I was asking a straight forward question to them not you. ![]() ![]() Yeah I follow ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't want to sound elitist, but if people can't take proper attention to detail when writing, often times they come up short in other areas as well. First impressions are almost everything, and there's no question that a well written profile and messages will always have a greater success rate. This is not an opinion, but a fact, especially for us men that are on the hunt for the opposite sex. " but what about a badly written profile of a woman, who has other attributes that you find attractive.....would you take your elitist hat off and message her anyway? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Profiles that are ritten with paw grammer and spelling misstakes is a rite turn off. It only takes a few seconds to use a spell checker. Are we being harsh or does anyone else agree?" Assuming you're going for irony here? X | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Profiles that are ritten with paw grammer and spelling misstakes is a rite turn off. It only takes a few seconds to use a spell checker. Are we being harsh or does anyone else agree? As a trained Proofreader, I never use or even recommend using a Spell Checker. They are invariably at least 12 months out of date from reality, plus more often than not, are biased towards American English, and often the correct spelling of the word on the associated context can be incorrect." As an untrained proofreader it took me about 10 seconds to switch my spell-check to British-English. I'm intrigued about the '12 months out of date from reality'. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Profiles that are ritten with paw grammer and spelling misstakes is a rite turn off. It only takes a few seconds to use a spell checker. Are we being harsh or does anyone else agree? ? Have you made deliberate mistakes to make your point? And there is no spell checker on a phone. " There is spellchecker on phones. It's better known as autocarrot | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is this tongue in cheek?" One can hope! ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" And there is no spell checker on a phone. There is spellchecker on phones. It's better known as autocarrot" ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Profiles that are ritten with paw grammer and spelling misstakes is a rite turn off. It only takes a few seconds to use a spell checker. Are we being harsh or does anyone else agree?" do you mean badly written ? ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Depends how badly written. Im the typo queen of the forum ![]() * I'm ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We took great time and effort to write our profile so you can assess whether we are your type. By contrast folks who take only a few seconds and write something like: 'fun couple looking for a right royal spit roast' get blocked by us. Make an effort!" damn if I was a couple I would spend days writing my profile and have the oxford English to hand ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top | ![]() |