FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Condoms contain a carciogen!!

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

The World Health Organisation has said that MBT (mercaptobenzothiazole) which is contained in condoms and babies dummies amongst many other things is a carcinogen.

Since 20% of the population die of cancer whilst AIDs sufferers have a normal life expectancy in the UK this could for some provide serious food for thought.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Okay...but how long do you have to wear one before they have a significant effect and how is that carcinogen absorbed into the human body?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

East Sussex

The article in The Telegraph says they're no risk to the general public but people working in the manufacture of them and other products should be wary.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ee VianteWoman
over a year ago

Somewhere in North Norfolk


"The article in The Telegraph says they're no risk to the general public but people working in the manufacture of them and other products should be wary."

I still expect to hear bareback fans using this argument for at least the next decade.

It may replace "I have a latex allergy" in the top spot of excuses.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"The article in The Telegraph says they're no risk to the general public but people working in the manufacture of them and other products should be wary.

I still expect to hear bareback fans using this argument for at least the next decade.

It may replace "I have a latex allergy" in the top spot of excuses."

Haha someone used the latex allergy line on me .... I pulled out a latex free condom

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"The article in The Telegraph says they're no risk to the general public but people working in the manufacture of them and other products should be wary.

I still expect to hear bareback fans using this argument for at least the next decade.

It may replace "I have a latex allergy" in the top spot of excuses.

Haha someone used the latex allergy line on me .... I pulled out a latex free condom "
my god you were a girl guide wernt you

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ire_bladeMan
over a year ago

Manchester


"The article in The Telegraph says they're no risk to the general public but people working in the manufacture of them and other products should be wary.

I still expect to hear bareback fans using this argument for at least the next decade.

It may replace "I have a latex allergy" in the top spot of excuses.

Haha someone used the latex allergy line on me .... I pulled out a latex free condom my god you were a girl guide wernt you"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Everything's a carcinogen, basically.

Best stay cooped up, barricaded indoors in our tinfoil hats and hazmat suits

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ophieslutTV/TS
over a year ago

Central

What's with the reference to HIV positive people? They have condoms in their sexual health practices like everyone else.

mercaptobenzothiazole is used in rubber products, so latex free may be fine. And you'll likely to be exposed to it via other sources.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *olgateMan
over a year ago

on the road to nowhere in particular

Love without a glove is the new safe sex apart from all the killer STIs

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *olgateMan
over a year ago

on the road to nowhere in particular

Love without a glove is the new safe sex apart from all the killer STIs

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"The World Health Organisation has said that MBT (mercaptobenzothiazole) which is contained in condoms is a carcinogen. "

Just give up smoking them and you'll be fine

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

They say the risk is about the same as eating processed meat. But that is for members of the general public. I guess swingers wear condoms for far longer than the general public on average.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham


"They say the risk is about the same as eating processed meat. But that is for members of the general public. I guess swingers wear condoms for far longer than the general public on average. "

so what do you suggest as a solution then?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham


"The World Health Organisation has said that MBT (mercaptobenzothiazole) which is contained in condoms and babies dummies amongst many other things is a carcinogen.

Since 20% of the population die of cancer whilst AIDs sufferers have a normal life expectancy in the UK this could for some provide serious food for thought. "

because AIDS is the only possible outcome of ditching the condom

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ohn MingoMan
over a year ago

Dublin


"The World Health Organisation has said that MBT (mercaptobenzothiazole) which is contained in condoms and babies dummies amongst many other things is a carcinogen.

Since 20% of the population die of cancer whilst AIDs sufferers have a normal life expectancy in the UK this could for some provide serious food for thought.

because AIDS is the only possible outcome of ditching the condom "

Yeah, they made it sound like they'd take AIDS over cancer.

No to both, thanks.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"They say the risk is about the same as eating processed meat. But that is for members of the general public. I guess swingers wear condoms for far longer than the general public on average.

so what do you suggest as a solution then?"

Become celibate? Risk STIs, Or risk it whilst pressing for the carcinogen to be removed from condoms.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"What's with the reference to HIV positive people? They have condoms in their sexual health practices like everyone else.

mercaptobenzothiazole is used in rubber products, so latex free may be fine. And you'll likely to be exposed to it via other sources."

Fear of death from HIV is the often quoted reason for using condoms yet cancer kills 1:5 of the population and, for example, flu 12,000 per year in the uk.

If you have a tendancy to have cancer in your family a STI may be the least risky alternative. Does that explain it?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top