Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to The Lounge |
| Jump to newest |  |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I thought that was more or less a given, although Osborn seems keen to sell us to the Chinese..." yeep, certainly nuclear power statio contracs | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What next? Are we puppets to the USA? " thats one view.... the other is that he took himself into an embassy voluntarily to avoid being extrited to sweden on two allegations of rape and flaunted both uk bail conditions.... and an european arrest warrent in the process.... he wants compensation... i say put it in a car opposite and tell him he has to come collect it personally......  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What next? Are we puppets to the USA? " were that the case in this case he would have been a case of extraordinary rendition and by now we would have forgotten about him.. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I thought that was more or less a given, although Osborn seems keen to sell us to the Chinese..." Do you long for the days of empire when we didn't have to suck up to anyone? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"didnt he have a profile on here saying he didnt travel ?" Yeah but embassies have a lot of rooms to accommodate | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I wonder if the Ecuadorian embassy have started charging him board and lodgings yet? "i doubt they will .... apparently people in threat of extradition from the UK get to to stay in the "pinochet thatcher arse licking suite" on the top floor of the ecuadorian embassy, gratis and indefinately .... seems fair enough really. the only fee is keeping coppers on triple time stood outside as a pointless exercise in wasting tax | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I wonder if the Ecuadorian embassy have started charging him board and lodgings yet?
i doubt they will .... apparently people in threat of extradition from the UK get to to stay in the "pinochet thatcher arse licking suite" on the top floor of the ecuadorian embassy, gratis and indefinately .... seems fair enough really. the only fee is keeping coppers on triple time stood outside as a pointless exercise in wasting tax "What's the link between Ecuador and Pinochet? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The guy is a hero fighting for our rights. If you read the statement about the "rape" it's quite clear he is only guilty of being a crap shag. Now that's half the guys on here. " . Err no I'm actually a big wiki leaks fan but the charges from what I understand are slightly bizarre. It appears assange had sexual relations with two women within the wiki leaks organisation, these two women went to the Swedish police wanting him to be forced into a std and dna test, they said they couldn't force him and he refused one woman alleged that he deliberately broke a condom and the other had a bizarre statement about some sort of conversation that took place mid sex.. Anyhow from what I can gather the charges are there to force him into the tests?... Sweden also refused him residency (which for a country who happily takes in millions of immigrants seems strange) but what I read was that residency would stop his deportation to the US where they want to jail him for life for whistleblowing.... Assange himself is a bit of an oddball, he's very aggressive in what he releases, however in his defence he says the system is set up so that nobody including himself knows who's blowing what whistle??. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The guy is a hero fighting for our rights. If you read the statement about the "rape" it's quite clear he is only guilty of being a crap shag. Now that's half the guys on here. . Err no I'm actually a big wiki leaks fan but the charges from what I understand are slightly bizarre. It appears assange had sexual relations with two women within the wiki leaks organisation, these two women went to the Swedish police wanting him to be forced into a std and dna test, they said they couldn't force him and he refused one woman alleged that he deliberately broke a condom and the other had a bizarre statement about some sort of conversation that took place mid sex.. Anyhow from what I can gather the charges are there to force him into the tests?... Sweden also refused him residency (which for a country who happily takes in millions of immigrants seems strange) but what I read was that residency would stop his deportation to the US where they want to jail him for life for whistleblowing.... Assange himself is a bit of an oddball, he's very aggressive in what he releases, however in his defence he says the system is set up so that nobody including himself knows who's blowing what whistle??." I wish they'd come up with another word for this kind of shit and not call it rape. It's a fucking insult to people like that poor Indian girl who got attacked on a bus by complete strangers when she was just trying to go about her normal life. A guy who you knew and consented with at some point, but subsequently turned out to be an arse; is still wrong. But it's not even in the same ball park. I | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The law in Swedish different to here but it is still sex without consent. " . I wouldn't swear to this but I thought I read awhile back that the Swedish authority's admit there's no rape allegation?, and that they were using that allegation to force the STD/DNA test! They left in place a charge of sexual harassment I'm not sure, but it's all very bizarre! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The guy is a hero fighting for our rights. If you read the statement about the "rape" it's quite clear he is only guilty of being a crap shag. Now that's half the guys on here. " Really? Which statement? I have read the legal judgement from the President of the Queen's Bench and it is clear that he would be charged with rape in this country too. I'd be happy to direct you to the cps website... That was fundamental to the extradition proceedings. Mr ddc | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I wonder if the Ecuadorian embassy have started charging him board and lodgings yet?
i doubt they will .... apparently people in threat of extradition from the UK get to to stay in the "pinochet thatcher arse licking suite" on the top floor of the ecuadorian embassy, gratis and indefinately .... seems fair enough really. the only fee is keeping coppers on triple time stood outside as a pointless exercise in wasting tax
What's the link between Ecuador and Pinochet? "ecuador were part of a pan south american alliance in partnership with spain that was calling for pinochet to be brought to justice for the murder, torture and disappearance of ten of thousands of chilleans and foreign nationals (many of them being ecuadorian and spanish, some being government officials and journalists). the alliance was fronted by spain as the alliance believed that extradition was ensured as spain was a member of the EU. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sweden is a democratic country with a robust legal system. He should be man enough to face the charges. " I see him at grave risk of USA involvement and far worse than we could probably imagine. I'm fully supportive of all rapists being investigated appropriately but feel that the UN decision should be absolutely final. He should now be freed. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I wonder if the Ecuadorian embassy have started charging him board and lodgings yet?
i doubt they will .... apparently people in threat of extradition from the UK get to to stay in the "pinochet thatcher arse licking suite" on the top floor of the ecuadorian embassy, gratis and indefinately .... seems fair enough really. the only fee is keeping coppers on triple time stood outside as a pointless exercise in wasting tax
What's the link between Ecuador and Pinochet?
ecuador were part of a pan south american alliance in partnership with spain that was calling for pinochet to be brought to justice for the murder, torture and disappearance of ten of thousands of chilleans and foreign nationals (many of them being ecuadorian and spanish, some being government officials and journalists). the alliance was fronted by spain as the alliance believed that extradition was ensured as spain was a member of the EU."So if they don't like him, why would their embassy have a suite for licking his ass? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I wonder if the Ecuadorian embassy have started charging him board and lodgings yet?
i doubt they will .... apparently people in threat of extradition from the UK get to to stay in the "pinochet thatcher arse licking suite" on the top floor of the ecuadorian embassy, gratis and indefinately .... seems fair enough really. the only fee is keeping coppers on triple time stood outside as a pointless exercise in wasting tax
What's the link between Ecuador and Pinochet?
ecuador were part of a pan south american alliance in partnership with spain that was calling for pinochet to be brought to justice for the murder, torture and disappearance of ten of thousands of chilleans and foreign nationals (many of them being ecuadorian and spanish, some being government officials and journalists). the alliance was fronted by spain as the alliance believed that extradition was ensured as spain was a member of the EU.
So if they don't like him, why would their embassy have a suite for licking his ass? "it's just their way of sticking two fingers up to the UK because of tatchers interference in the british judicial process. interference that resulted in him being allowed to return to chile instead of facing trial for his crimes. she also interfered with the border control process when he initially turned up here travelling on a forged passport. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I wonder if the Ecuadorian embassy have started charging him board and lodgings yet?
i doubt they will .... apparently people in threat of extradition from the UK get to to stay in the "pinochet thatcher arse licking suite" on the top floor of the ecuadorian embassy, gratis and indefinately .... seems fair enough really. the only fee is keeping coppers on triple time stood outside as a pointless exercise in wasting tax
What's the link between Ecuador and Pinochet?
ecuador were part of a pan south american alliance in partnership with spain that was calling for pinochet to be brought to justice for the murder, torture and disappearance of ten of thousands of chilleans and foreign nationals (many of them being ecuadorian and spanish, some being government officials and journalists). the alliance was fronted by spain as the alliance believed that extradition was ensured as spain was a member of the EU.
So if they don't like him, why would their embassy have a suite for licking his ass?
it's just their way of sticking two fingers up to the UK because of tatchers interference in the british judicial process. interference that resulted in him being allowed to return to chile instead of facing trial for his crimes. she also interfered with the border control process when he initially turned up here travelling on a forged passport."Right I am at least understanding you now for a change. Other than suites are normally named a certain way in order to show respect for someone or something, which is why I got so confused. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Right I am at least understanding you now for a change. Other than suites are normally named a certain way in order to show respect for someone or something, which is why I got so confused. " respectfully, you're probaly a tad young to have got the connection in my initial post | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sweden is a democratic country with a robust legal system. He should be man enough to face the charges. " . They haven't charged him with anything!. He's wanted for questionings on allegations! He is arguing that Sweden can come to the Ecuadorian embassy and question him (the un agrees) and Sweden is insisting he comes to sweden | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sweden is a democratic country with a robust legal system. He should be man enough to face the charges. I see him at grave risk of USA involvement and far worse than we could probably imagine. I'm fully supportive of all rapists being investigated appropriately but feel that the UN decision should be absolutely final. He should now be freed." Thankfully, it's not a decision or a verdict, it's a UN report with no legal standing whatsoever. There is nowhere for him to be "freed" from, since it's entirely his own choice to hole up in the embassy. If he wants a legal decision then he should take it to the ECHR. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" No one should be above the law, even if they think they're some sort of person of monumental historical importance." Agree completely ! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Right I am at least understanding you now for a change. Other than suites are normally named a certain way in order to show respect for someone or something, which is why I got so confused. respectfully, you're probaly a tad young to have got the connection in my initial post" I'm well aware of who pinochet was. Your link just doesn't make any sense because that's not how suites are named. But don't let it stop you trying to blame another thing on thatcher, I wouldn't want to take that from you. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Right I am at least understanding you now for a change. Other than suites are normally named a certain way in order to show respect for someone or something, which is why I got so confused. respectfully, you're probaly a tad young to have got the connection in my initial post I'm well aware of who pinochet was. Your link just doesn't make any sense because that's not how suites are named. But don't let it stop you trying to blame another thing on thatcher, I wouldn't want to take that from you. " what are you talking about now?  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sweden is a democratic country with a robust legal system. He should be man enough to face the charges. I see him at grave risk of USA involvement and far worse than we could probably imagine. I'm fully supportive of all rapists being investigated appropriately but feel that the UN decision should be absolutely final. He should now be freed. Thankfully, it's not a decision or a verdict, it's a UN report with no legal standing whatsoever. There is nowhere for him to be "freed" from, since it's entirely his own choice to hole up in the embassy. If he wants a legal decision then he should take it to the ECHR. " . Didn't the high court refuse to let him take it too the echr after his appeal? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sweden is a democratic country with a robust legal system. He should be man enough to face the charges. I see him at grave risk of USA involvement and far worse than we could probably imagine. I'm fully supportive of all rapists being investigated appropriately but feel that the UN decision should be absolutely final. He should now be freed. Thankfully, it's not a decision or a verdict, it's a UN report with no legal standing whatsoever. There is nowhere for him to be "freed" from, since it's entirely his own choice to hole up in the embassy. If he wants a legal decision then he should take it to the ECHR. . Didn't the high court refuse to let him take it too the echr after his appeal?" Oh, not sure. Hopefully. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sweden is a democratic country with a robust legal system. He should be man enough to face the charges. I see him at grave risk of USA involvement and far worse than we could probably imagine. I'm fully supportive of all rapists being investigated appropriately but feel that the UN decision should be absolutely final. He should now be freed. Thankfully, it's not a decision or a verdict, it's a UN report with no legal standing whatsoever. There is nowhere for him to be "freed" from, since it's entirely his own choice to hole up in the embassy. If he wants a legal decision then he should take it to the ECHR. . Didn't the high court refuse to let him take it too the echr after his appeal?" The UK government said last night on the news they have European law on their side and the UN ruling is irrelevant because it has no legal standing. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Didn't the high court refuse to let him take it too the echr after his appeal?" No. He has, so far, declined to take his case to the Echr. Presumably because he knows he would lose, and that would make it harder for the Ecuador Embassy to claim he was being victimised. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" He is arguing that Sweden can come to the Ecuadorian embassy and question him (the un agrees) and Sweden is insisting he comes to sweden" I've always assumed that was a question of legal jurisdiction. Technically is not the embassy 'legally' on Ecuadorian soil, therefore not in the EU? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
". It's not going away... " Sadly three of the cases already have due to the statute of limitations. He has to stall until 2020 to be able to walk free from the rape charge. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
". It's not going away... Sadly three of the cases already have due to the statute of limitations. He has to stall until 2020 to be able to walk free from the rape charge. "4 more years then. That's a lot of takeaway pizzas | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What next? Are we puppets to the USA? thats one view.... the other is that he took himself into an embassy voluntarily to avoid being extrited to sweden on two allegations of rape and flaunted both uk bail conditions.... and an european arrest warrent in the process.... he wants compensation... i say put it in a car opposite and tell him he has to come collect it personally...... "don't think he's put in for compensation.. Yet. Apparently the only reason hevs there is because he can't get any guarantee he won't be extridited thw the USA. Otherwise i think he would go to answer the accusations. Re: money in car over rhe road... Roller skates? Long bamboo pole with hook on? on a serious note i just don't trust the Americans.. Sorry | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
". It's not going away... Sadly three of the cases already have due to the statute of limitations. He has to stall until 2020 to be able to walk free from the rape charge. "are the accusations real or a method of leverage to get him to the USA? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
". It's not going away... Sadly three of the cases already have due to the statute of limitations. He has to stall until 2020 to be able to walk free from the rape charge. are the accusations real or a method of leverage to get him to the USA? "According to our highest court, real. Do you not realise that the uk has an extradition treaty with the US? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
". It's not going away... Sadly three of the cases already have due to the statute of limitations. He has to stall until 2020 to be able to walk free from the rape charge.
4 more years then. That's a lot of takeaway pizzas "I read it was all hampers (and champers) from Harrods | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Didn't the high court refuse to let him take it too the echr after his appeal? No. He has, so far, declined to take his case to the Echr. Presumably because he knows he would lose, and that would make it harder for the Ecuador Embassy to claim he was being victimised. " . I thought the high court appeal refused him supreme court appeal? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
". It's not going away... Sadly three of the cases already have due to the statute of limitations. He has to stall until 2020 to be able to walk free from the rape charge. ". If they charged him that wouldn't apply though would it? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Didn't the high court refuse to let him take it too the echr after his appeal? No. He has, so far, declined to take his case to the Echr. Presumably because he knows he would lose, and that would make it harder for the Ecuador Embassy to claim he was being victimised. . I thought the high court appeal refused him supreme court appeal?" You asked about the ECHR | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What next? Are we puppets to the USA? were that the case in this case he would have been a case of extraordinary rendition and by now we would have forgotten about him.. " Who is he? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
". It's not going away... Sadly three of the cases already have due to the statute of limitations. He has to stall until 2020 to be able to walk free from the rape charge. are the accusations real or a method of leverage to get him to the USA?
According to our highest court, real. Do you not realise that the uk has an extradition treaty with the US?"yep, they have to get him out somehow though. As far as i'm aware there's no arrest warrent for him in the US, its a european one. So far anyway. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" I thought the high court appeal refused him supreme court appeal?" If it helps, here is a brief summary of the story so far (incliding his Supreme court ruling) http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-11949341 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Didn't the high court refuse to let him take it too the echr after his appeal? No. He has, so far, declined to take his case to the Echr. Presumably because he knows he would lose, and that would make it harder for the Ecuador Embassy to claim he was being victimised. . I thought the high court appeal refused him supreme court appeal? You asked about the ECHR" I don't know, I thought there might be an order in what you have to go through? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's disgraceful that the UK could become a pariah rogue state and not recognize the UN ruling. Especially after lecturing and invading countless places and dictatorships over the years. He should be allowed to leave the embassy and permitted to fly wherever he chooses. " yeah... about that un working group.... 1) it is a 6 member panal.. well.. was! 1 recused herself because she was an australian citizen and didn't want to be seen as showing bias.... 2 actually voted against the decision... and 3 did... so its not quite as clear cut as people would make it seen..... 2) part of the reason the group found against uk and sweden is the amount of time it was taken.... but thats not the uk and sweden fault.... that is assange fighting it in court after court in which all the decisions did not go his way there is still an EAW outstanding... and he flounted his UK bail conditions...... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
". It's not going away... Sadly three of the cases already have due to the statute of limitations. He has to stall until 2020 to be able to walk free from the rape charge. " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
". According to our highest court, real. Do you not realise that the uk has an extradition treaty with the US?" they do however... 1)the US have never asked to the UK to extridite him... 2) the EAW takes precedence.... so the swedes get 1st shot..... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The UK government will say pretty much anything, it's not a reliable source of the truth. I think it should accept this legal opinion, based upon international law, from the UN, to prevent any further fall in its international standing. How low can this once great country go? " Eh? you come on here time and time again to defend the EU and the ECHR, so when the UK says it has European law on its side in this case then suddenly it's not good enough and we need to accept the UN ruling? Unbelievable.  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's disgraceful that the UK could become a pariah rogue state and not recognize the UN ruling. Especially after lecturing and invading countless places and dictatorships over the years. He should be allowed to leave the embassy and permitted to fly wherever he chooses. yeah... about that un working group.... 1) it is a 6 member panal.. well.. was! 1 recused herself because she was an australian citizen and didn't want to be seen as showing bias.... 2 actually voted against the decision... and 3 did... so its not quite as clear cut as people would make it seen..... 2) part of the reason the group found against uk and sweden is the amount of time it was taken.... but thats not the uk and sweden fault.... that is assange fighting it in court after court in which all the decisions did not go his way there is still an EAW outstanding... and he flounted his UK bail conditions......" . Never mind this nonsense... Who's winning this Superbowl.. I've got a fiver on Carolina | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
". According to our highest court, real. Do you not realise that the uk has an extradition treaty with the US? they do however... 1)the US have never asked to the UK to extridite him... 2) the EAW takes precedence.... so the swedes get 1st shot..... " I'm thinking he'll be extradited to Sweden,then from Sweden to the USA. I'm thinking you already new that. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" No one should be above the law, even if they think they're some sort of person of monumental historical importance. Agree completely !" As do I, providing the law is not being abused to manipulate another outcome. It all just seems so dodgy under the circumstances. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" No one should be above the law, even if they think they're some sort of person of monumental historical importance. Agree completely ! As do I, providing the law is not being abused to manipulate another outcome. It all just seems so dodgy under the circumstances." 
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Regardless of what anyone thinks of the narcissistic twat. He has broken the law in this country and is facing charges in Sweden. Anything else is irrelevant " Apart from the hair. Ruby was right about that
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How can you possibly utter the names of Assange and Gadaffi alongside Tessla and Corbyn?" Personal perception and intensive research my friend | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think this is despicable. In my view, if he was innocent, surely he shouldn't have had anything to fear from standing trial He seems to be the architect of his* own predicament ..... " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So the Swedish authorities have revoked the warrant for his arrest and dropped the investigation, although the British Police have stated that he will still be arrested if he leaves the Ecuadorian Embassy. Aren't the Swedish Authorities sending out a message that if you're wanted on suspicion of a crime, all you've got to do is seek asylum in a foreign Embassy for 5 years and the case will be dropped? I think this is despicable. In my view, if he was innocent, surely he shouldn't have had anything to fear from standing trial" The world really is a simple place for you isn't it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So the Swedish authorities have revoked the warrant for his arrest and dropped the investigation, although the British Police have stated that he will still be arrested if he leaves the Ecuadorian Embassy. Aren't the Swedish Authorities sending out a message that if you're wanted on suspicion of a crime, all you've got to do is seek asylum in a foreign Embassy for 5 years and the case will be dropped? I think this is despicable. In my view, if he was innocent, surely he shouldn't have had anything to fear from standing trial" I think I recall back at that time that he was suspicious of the UK or Sweden handing him over to the USA - plus it appeared that the Swedish crimes weren't being handled under standard process. He had made himself available to the Swedish authorities too, I think. The UK spent far too much taxpayers money holding him under police surveillance. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
