FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

24 hrs notive brfore having sex or prison ?????

Jump to newest
 

By *eavenNhell OP   Couple
over a year ago

carrbrook stalybridge

heard on the news today of a man in his forty's who must inform the police of his intent to start sexual activity's with a female so that they can approach her with details of his past . failure by him to comply will trigger immediate imprisonment .

the man had recently been cleared of a rape charge

thoughts

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *artytwoCouple
over a year ago

Wolverhampton

How could they find out if he did? Is he allowed a wank?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eavenNhell OP   Couple
over a year ago

carrbrook stalybridge


"heard on the news today of a man in his forty's who must inform the police of his intent to start sexual activity's with a female so that they can approach her with details of his past . failure by him to comply will trigger immediate imprisonment .

the man had recently been cleared of a rape charge

thoughts "

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-york-north-yorkshire-35385227

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire

heard it also it does seem a bit weird, either he was cleared of the allegation or he was guilty in which case he would be on the sex offenders register..

but does someone who is on the register also have to comply with similar rules..?

not sure about the whole thing ..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I saw this on the mail site before seems like half a story to me somethings missing if he was cleared then this is a breach of human rights

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It would certainly cut down on the guys here sending 'fancy a fuck right now' messages

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inky-MinxWoman
over a year ago

Grantham


"I saw this on the mail site before seems like half a story to me somethings missing if he was cleared then this is a breach of human rights"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Does seem weird, either he is guilty or he isn't, there is no grey area. according to the story, the cops can decide to push this onto someone if they think he might be a danger. I think this is a get out clause, the cops or prosecution screwed up the investigation somehow, he is guilty but because of some stupid technicality he got to walk. I don't think they would use this lightly though.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I saw this on the mail site before seems like half a story to me somethings missing if he was cleared then this is a breach of human rights"

this x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *enard ArgenteMan
over a year ago

London and France

Then there is another part of the story ;

Perhaps he has a number of previous convictions, and is considered a risk .....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Why would we assume they screwed up. We had a family member killed by a guy. the police knew he done it but the crime persecution service wouldn't allow the police to charge him with her death on lack of concrete evidence and the guy walked

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

East Sussex

He also has to provide the woman's date of birth, that might be a clue as to why this has been put in place.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Makes you think how many sex offenders are on fab and how many attend clubs

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inky-MinxWoman
over a year ago

Grantham

It's not as difficult as you think to get on the SO register.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

There is more to this than is being reported

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

this could lead to lot of police man hours being wasted

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *erbyDalesCplCouple
over a year ago

Derbyshire


"heard on the news today of a man in his forty's who must inform the police of his intent to start sexual activity's with a female so that they can approach her with details of his past . failure by him to comply will trigger immediate imprisonment .

the man had recently been cleared of a rape charge

thoughts "

I've been saving this thread since I thought it was going to be one of your jokes.

Where did it say "so they can approach her with details of his past"? Without that, and coupled with his name being withheld, makes me wonder if he isn't a vulnerable adult himself with learning difficulties, and the order isn't trying to discourage him from having sex. Definitely a pertinent detail missing from the story, meaning it will be over-hyped by all and sundry. I'll stick with 'I trust the justice system, acting on all the facts, to deal with it properly'.

(Or blame government cuts?)

Mr ddc

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The story is far too vague to form an opinion.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

hmmm never heard this before - doesnt seem like the whole story has been told

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uv a sukMan
over a year ago

yorkshire

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Why would we assume they screwed up. We had a family member killed by a guy. the police knew he done it but the crime persecution service wouldn't allow the police to charge him with her death on lack of concrete evidence and the guy walked"

Sorry that you lost a loved one, but I do not think we should start convicting people without concrete evidence.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It's only for a period of 4 months! Bit of a mood killer but not that difficult really. It makes sense; if he's a serial offender (i.e hes got a mental problem) then he won't last 4 months and he'll get locked up for longer than he otherwise would have. If nothing goes wrong in 4 months then he probably doesn't have a problem.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top