FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Who would win in a fight

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Mike Tyson V's Bruce Lee

Now I like ol Bruce but I can't see him handling the mauling an animal like Tyson would dish out.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Bruce Lee without a flicker of doubt.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Bruce Lee without a flicker of doubt."
bruce wud win without a doubt

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Now you say that, but I'm not so sure, he was 5'5 and 9st. He was amazing but Tyson is massive unstoppable animal

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Now you say that, but I'm not so sure, he was 5'5 and 9st. He was amazing but Tyson is massive unstoppable animal"
smaller faster with fine tuned martial arts skills one kick from bruce wud have tyson well and truly on the deck out for the count and licking his wounds and pride ever after me thinks x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

tyson wouldnt get anywhere near bruce lee hes far too quick in his actions tyson wouldnt see it coming.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"tyson wouldnt get anywhere near bruce lee hes far too quick in his actions tyson wouldnt see it coming."

Again you say that, but Bruce Lee was a big proponent of boxing, he had a lot of respect for them as he fought a lot of boxers on the streets of Hong Kong.

Boxers are very very fast, Bruce could deliver a tremendous amount of power much more than his frame would suggest. But Tyson is literally twice the size and power

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *olgateMan
over a year ago

on the road to nowhere in particular

Check out the Bruce Lee 1" punch then tell me that Tyson had a hope in hell of beating him

C...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Just take a look a Bolo Yeung ... if Bruce could take him down then Tyson wouldn't be a problem

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"tyson wouldnt get anywhere near bruce lee hes far too quick in his actions tyson wouldnt see it coming.

Again you say that, but Bruce Lee was a big proponent of boxing, he had a lot of respect for them as he fought a lot of boxers on the streets of Hong Kong.

s

Boxers are very very fast, Bruce could deliver a tremendous amount of power much more than his frame would suggest. But Tyson is literally twice the size and power "
size and braun isnt eveything speed agility and the prowess of martial arts takes some beating and bruce was at the very top of his game too x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *dam_TinaCouple
over a year ago

Hampshire

On the basis of Mike Tyson being alive I'll say him

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I saw a vid on you tube between a big bruiser of a guy and one of the Gracie brothers (Jiu Jitsu), the big guy got wasted. Size doesn't matter, it's skill and speed, apart from the fact the Bruce is no longer with us, if they were put in the UFC ring, my money would be on Bruce Lee, no one could match his speed.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Mike Tyson V's Bruce Lee

Now I like ol Bruce but I can't see him handling the mauling an animal like Tyson would dish out. "

Lee's versatility, and speed would give him a big advantage.

But Tyson could take a punch.

Tyson would only have to hit Lee once to slow him down.

How long could Lee evade Tyson, while trying to wear him down, at the same time as not getting hit himself.

Both fighters have skills that could counter the other.

I can't call it......

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Watch Ip Man 2 to give you an idea between a boxer and Jeet Kune do (Bruce Lees Art) the boxer does slow him down but loses in the end.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Just take a look a Bolo Yeung ... if Bruce could take him down then Tyson wouldn't be a problem "

Well no I don't think so, old bolo is the same height as me and I'm practically a midget. Where Tyson is quite a bit bigger.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Just take a look a Bolo Yeung ... if Bruce could take him down then Tyson wouldn't be a problem

Well no I don't think so, old bolo is the same height as me and I'm practically a midget. Where Tyson is quite a bit bigger. "
you seem to be on the tyson winning team so if thats what you firmly believe why the debate ? as your mind seems pretty made up and discounting what the majority are saying ??

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

bruce i would think

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I have trained and competed in a couple of martial arts. The closest I have come to boxing is kickboxing.

Boxers/kickboxers are hard to beat in a fight without rules because they train to take hits in order to get you with a better/harder hit. In a brawl I would pick the boxer.

Most martial arts by comparison focus around evasion, deflection, counter attacks and the precision and control of attacks. In a fight with a referee I would pick the martial artist.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Just take a look a Bolo Yeung ... if Bruce could take him down then Tyson wouldn't be a problem

Well no I don't think so, old bolo is the same height as me and I'm practically a midget. Where Tyson is quite a bit bigger. you seem to be on the tyson winning team so if thats what you firmly believe why the debate ? as your mind seems pretty made up and discounting what the majority are saying ??"

It's a discussion, it wouldn't be terribly interesting if I just agreed with every one, and my mind is far from made up its just that most people seem to think Bruce would win I'm trying to tease out the reasons they think this

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Try to track down a series called fight science.

Well worth a watch.....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Mike Tyson V's Bruce Lee

Now I like ol Bruce but I can't see him handling the mauling an animal like Tyson would dish out. "

In their prime? Tyson - pure savage

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *odareyouMan
over a year ago

not far from iceland,,,,,, tescos is nearer though :-) (near leeds)

Apple's and oranges... Is it no holds barred , rules, refs.

Folk forget a young Tyson was a very very accomplished boxer, one of the best heavy weights .. I remember Ali fighting a kick boxing world champion when Ali was world heavyweight champ and the kick boxer spent the rounds on his backside kicking Ali on his legs..

I'm going Tyson,..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *olgateMan
over a year ago

on the road to nowhere in particular

Tyson was very small for a heavyweight but was very fast. He also had most of his opponents beaten before he got in the ring. Boxers like Mitchell Green in his early years and Holyfield later on showed up his deficiencies.

Conor McGregor shows how effective speed and accuracy are for smaller fighters.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Just take a look a Bolo Yeung ... if Bruce could take him down then Tyson wouldn't be a problem

Well no I don't think so, old bolo is the same height as me and I'm practically a midget. Where Tyson is quite a bit bigger. "

Mike Tyson is only 1m78 tall, so not a monster. Bolo is 1m68 but physically as large as iron Mike

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *odareyouMan
over a year ago

not far from iceland,,,,,, tescos is nearer though :-) (near leeds)


"Just take a look a Bolo Yeung ... if Bruce could take him down then Tyson wouldn't be a problem "

Did they ever fight ??

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Tyson would easily win ..... there's no cinematic licence in a real fight...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

bet ronnie pickering would waste them both

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *olgateMan
over a year ago

on the road to nowhere in particular

Do you know who I am?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *entaur_UKMan
over a year ago

Cannock

In a street fight with no rules I would pick Bruce Lee. Martial arts is more fluid and able to adapt to different fighting styles where boxing is more rigid and Tyson would be limited to only having boxing skills. Bruce Lee would be able to use his hands, feet and also a knowledge of submission holds that Tyson wouldn't have.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Has to be Bruce Lee, Tyson wouldn't stand a chance!!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

If you're talking MA vs boxing, then there's the infamous Gene Lebell vs Milo Savage fight in 1963. This ended pretty much all trash talking that boxing is superior to MA

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top