Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to The Lounge |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"My mysteriously disappearing socks  "Be careful out there.  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just seen the Freemasons covered up not only the Sinking of the Titanic but also Jack the Ripper. I wonder what else this group of shopkeepers and accountants did. Any ideas I'm going with Shergar and Kaspar Hauser. " What was covered up about the sinking of the Titanic? Pretty straight forward really. Ship going too fast in dangerous waters, was not carrying enough lifeboats, hit iceberg and sank. Nearest ship failed to respond to distress flares (which was missed out by the Winslet/DeCaprio movie) and around 1200 died. All of that came out in the subsequent enquiry. Have I missed something? Aliens maybe? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just seen the Freemasons covered up not only the Sinking of the Titanic but also Jack the Ripper. I wonder what else this group of shopkeepers and accountants did. Any ideas I'm going with Shergar and Kaspar Hauser. What was covered up about the sinking of the Titanic? Pretty straight forward really. Ship going too fast in dangerous waters, was not carrying enough lifeboats, hit iceberg and sank. Nearest ship failed to respond to distress flares (which was missed out by the Winslet/DeCaprio movie) and around 1200 died. All of that came out in the subsequent enquiry. Have I missed something? Aliens maybe?" No you haven't missed anything. Freemasons actually do a huge amount for charitable causes and lots of good work. But they do it quietly. Because there is an air of mystique they are targeted by peeps who really do not understand. Sleep peacefully all. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just seen the Freemasons covered up not only the Sinking of the Titanic but also Jack the Ripper. I wonder what else this group of shopkeepers and accountants did. Any ideas I'm going with Shergar and Kaspar Hauser. What was covered up about the sinking of the Titanic? Pretty straight forward really. Ship going too fast in dangerous waters, was not carrying enough lifeboats, hit iceberg and sank. Nearest ship failed to respond to distress flares (which was missed out by the Winslet/DeCaprio movie) and around 1200 died. All of that came out in the subsequent enquiry. Have I missed something? Aliens maybe? No you haven't missed anything. Freemasons actually do a huge amount for charitable causes and lots of good work. But they do it quietly. Because there is an air of mystique they are targeted by peeps who really do not understand. Sleep peacefully all." They also run the Isle of Wight according to David Icke. Usually the rumours start after butthurt people can't get in. Some wonderful mulled wine will be sold in our ends this Xmas all proceeds to charity by them. In between plotting their next nefarious plot. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 Oh & yes they raise an awful lot of money for local charities | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Still wont let a catholic join though." Won't they? Can't say I know much about them to be honest  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Still wont let a catholic join though." There are a few Catholic Freemason organizations - P2 was one if i remember right | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just seen the Freemasons covered up not only the Sinking of the Titanic but also Jack the Ripper. I wonder what else this group of shopkeepers and accountants did. Any ideas I'm going with Shergar and Kaspar Hauser. " They did not cover up the sinking of the Titanic, everyone in the world knew about it! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I loved their remix of Work. " dum ~ ch ~ dum ch ~ ch ~ ctiz ~ dum ~ dum ~ ctiz I love electro dance! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just seen the Freemasons covered up not only the Sinking of the Titanic but also Jack the Ripper. I wonder what else this group of shopkeepers and accountants did. Any ideas I'm going with Shergar and Kaspar Hauser. They did not cover up the sinking of the Titanic, everyone in the world knew about it!" Well that was kinda the point of the thread. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"catholics can join we have them in my lodge this is a myth and its not a secret society its a society with secrets " Absolutely correct. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A FAB Freemason - they are true gents on here X " Thank you. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I was invited to be a mason but it's all a little bit too weird for me. " ditto.. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just seen the Freemasons covered up not only the Sinking of the Titanic but also Jack the Ripper. I wonder what else this group of shopkeepers and accountants did. Any ideas I'm going with Shergar and Kaspar Hauser. What was covered up about the sinking of the Titanic? Pretty straight forward really. Ship going too fast in dangerous waters, was not carrying enough lifeboats, hit iceberg and sank. Nearest ship failed to respond to distress flares (which was missed out by the Winslet/DeCaprio movie) and around 1200 died. All of that came out in the subsequent enquiry. Have I missed something? Aliens maybe?" There is a conspiracy about the Titanic. It's something along the lines of this. It's sister ship (the Britanic I think) was involved in a collision before the Titanic set sail. The collision seriously damaged the ship but it did not sink, however it was for all intents a write off. The owner switched the ships and deliberately sank the Britannic, which they claimed was the Titanic, and got a meeting much bigger insurance claim for it. I'm quoting this conspiracy from memory so may not have got everything about it completely right. Needless to say I think it's total rubbish but the conspiracy theory does exist. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just seen the Freemasons covered up not only the Sinking of the Titanic but also Jack the Ripper. I wonder what else this group of shopkeepers and accountants did. Any ideas I'm going with Shergar and Kaspar Hauser. What was covered up about the sinking of the Titanic? Pretty straight forward really. Ship going too fast in dangerous waters, was not carrying enough lifeboats, hit iceberg and sank. Nearest ship failed to respond to distress flares (which was missed out by the Winslet/DeCaprio movie) and around 1200 died. All of that came out in the subsequent enquiry. Have I missed something? Aliens maybe? There is a conspiracy about the Titanic. It's something along the lines of this. It's sister ship (the Britanic I think) was involved in a collision before the Titanic set sail. The collision seriously damaged the ship but it did not sink, however it was for all intents a write off. The owner switched the ships and deliberately sank the Britannic, which they claimed was the Titanic, and got a meeting much bigger insurance claim for it. I'm quoting this conspiracy from memory so may not have got everything about it completely right. Needless to say I think it's total rubbish but the conspiracy theory does exist." Did not the loss of the rich bankers on board allow the private Federal Reserve to be quietly brought into existence by Rothchild and co. Remember reading something along those lines | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Still wont let a catholic join though." Actually it's Catholics who were not supposed to join the Freemasons because it's a closed society. But I don't think that rule is still in force. Many Freemason lodges would not recruit Catholics because it was felt that their beliefs were contra to the aims and objectives of the Freemason movement. I'm not aware of any blanket ban of Catholics within the masonic movement but I would not be surprised if some lodges still did not recruit them. Of course I'd only know for sure if I was a mason and if I was I shouldn't and wouldn't say. I am, however, free to say I am Catholic. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"catholics can join we have them in my lodge this is a myth and its not a secret society its a society with secrets " Classed as a closed society for work purposes you have to declare membership. Mr W | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Bunch of posh tossers who think they are better than the rest of us...they only keep their lies secret to make themselves the "elite"... Oink oink!!" And you know this for a fact how? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Bunch of posh tossers who think they are better than the rest of us...they only keep their lies secret to make themselves the "elite"... Oink oink!!" Lies? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Of course I'd only know for sure if I was a mason and if I was I shouldn't and wouldn't say. I am, however, free to say I am Catholic." Generally Masons don't say ... However you can generally tell as there is a demeanour about them unless they are wearing their cuff links of course .... I have not met one Freemason who was not a gent .... As the gentleman said they are a society that hold secrets not a secret society X | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"catholics can join we have them in my lodge this is a myth and its not a secret society its a society with secrets Classed as a closed society for work purposes you have to declare membership. Mr W " No job I have ever had has ever asked me?? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Of course I'd only know for sure if I was a mason and if I was I shouldn't and wouldn't say. I am, however, free to say I am Catholic. Generally Masons don't say ... However you can generally tell as there is a demeanour about them unless they are wearing their cuff links of course .... I have not met one Freemason who was not a gent .... As the gentleman said they are a society that hold secrets not a secret society X " That's why I said shouldn't and wouldn't rather than couldn't. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Bunch of posh tossers who think they are better than the rest of us...they only keep their lies secret to make themselves the "elite"... Oink oink!!" can assure you that the lodge that i was invited into wasn't full of posh tossers, pretty much hard working single business owners etc and some from the job i was in.. i just didn't personally like that i had seen bias given to lodge members by other masons over people better suited to the position vacant.. respect that it may have been a minority but was enough for me to say no ta.. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Bunch of posh tossers who think they are better than the rest of us...they only keep their lies secret to make themselves the "elite"... Oink oink!!" Dont most swingers keep secrets? nothing wrong with discretion. Also I am declaring I didn't sink the Titanic either | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just seen the Freemasons covered up not only the Sinking of the Titanic but also Jack the Ripper. I wonder what else this group of shopkeepers and accountants did. Any ideas I'm going with Shergar and Kaspar Hauser. What was covered up about the sinking of the Titanic? Pretty straight forward really. Ship going too fast in dangerous waters, was not carrying enough lifeboats, hit iceberg and sank. Nearest ship failed to respond to distress flares (which was missed out by the Winslet/DeCaprio movie) and around 1200 died. All of that came out in the subsequent enquiry. Have I missed something? Aliens maybe? There is a conspiracy about the Titanic. It's something along the lines of this. It's sister ship (the Britanic I think) was involved in a collision before the Titanic set sail. The collision seriously damaged the ship but it did not sink, however it was for all intents a write off. The owner switched the ships and deliberately sank the Britannic, which they claimed was the Titanic, and got a meeting much bigger insurance claim for it. I'm quoting this conspiracy from memory so may not have got everything about it completely right. Needless to say I think it's total rubbish but the conspiracy theory does exist." The keel for Britannic was laid on 30 November 1911 at the Harland and Wolff shipyard in Belfast, 13 months after the launch of the Olympic. Due to improvements introduced as a consequence of the Titanic disaster, Britannic was not launched until 26 February 1914, which was filmed along with the fitting of a funnel.[10] Fitting out began subsequently. She was constructed in the same gantry slip used to build RMS Olympic. Reusing Olympic??'?s space saved the shipyard time and money by not clearing out a third slip similar in size to those used for Olympic and Titanic. In August 1914, before Britannic could commence transatlantic service between New York and Southampton, the First World War began. Immediately, all shipyards with Admiralty contracts were given top priority to use available raw materials. All civil contracts (including the Britannic) were slowed down. The naval authorities requisitioned a large number of ships as armed merchant cruisers or for troop transport. The Admiralty was paying the companies for the use of their ships but the risk of losing a ship in naval operations was high. However, the big ocean liners were not taken for naval use, because the smaller ships were much easier to operate. White Star decided to withdraw RMS Olympic from service until the danger had passed. RMS Olympic returned to Belfast on 3 November 1914, while work on her sister continued slowly. All this would change in 1915. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just seen the Freemasons covered up not only the Sinking of the Titanic but also Jack the Ripper. I wonder what else this group of shopkeepers and accountants did. Any ideas I'm going with Shergar and Kaspar Hauser. What was covered up about the sinking of the Titanic? Pretty straight forward really. Ship going too fast in dangerous waters, was not carrying enough lifeboats, hit iceberg and sank. Nearest ship failed to respond to distress flares (which was missed out by the Winslet/DeCaprio movie) and around 1200 died. All of that came out in the subsequent enquiry. Have I missed something? Aliens maybe? There is a conspiracy about the Titanic. It's something along the lines of this. It's sister ship (the Britanic I think) was involved in a collision before the Titanic set sail. The collision seriously damaged the ship but it did not sink, however it was for all intents a write off. The owner switched the ships and deliberately sank the Britannic, which they claimed was the Titanic, and got a meeting much bigger insurance claim for it. I'm quoting this conspiracy from memory so may not have got everything about it completely right. Needless to say I think it's total rubbish but the conspiracy theory does exist. The keel for Britannic was laid on 30 November 1911 at the Harland and Wolff shipyard in Belfast, 13 months after the launch of the Olympic. Due to improvements introduced as a consequence of the Titanic disaster, Britannic was not launched until 26 February 1914, which was filmed along with the fitting of a funnel.[10] Fitting out began subsequently. She was constructed in the same gantry slip used to build RMS Olympic. Reusing Olympic??'?s space saved the shipyard time and money by not clearing out a third slip similar in size to those used for Olympic and Titanic. In August 1914, before Britannic could commence transatlantic service between New York and Southampton, the First World War began. Immediately, all shipyards with Admiralty contracts were given top priority to use available raw materials. All civil contracts (including the Britannic) were slowed down. The naval authorities requisitioned a large number of ships as armed merchant cruisers or for troop transport. The Admiralty was paying the companies for the use of their ships but the risk of losing a ship in naval operations was high. However, the big ocean liners were not taken for naval use, because the smaller ships were much easier to operate. White Star decided to withdraw RMS Olympic from service until the danger had passed. RMS Olympic returned to Belfast on 3 November 1914, while work on her sister continued slowly. All this would change in 1915. "Don't take this the wrong way but that sounded like a childhood memory?
(Mods joking) | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just seen the Freemasons covered up not only the Sinking of the Titanic but also Jack the Ripper. I wonder what else this group of shopkeepers and accountants did. Any ideas I'm going with Shergar and Kaspar Hauser. What was covered up about the sinking of the Titanic? Pretty straight forward really. Ship going too fast in dangerous waters, was not carrying enough lifeboats, hit iceberg and sank. Nearest ship failed to respond to distress flares (which was missed out by the Winslet/DeCaprio movie) and around 1200 died. All of that came out in the subsequent enquiry. Have I missed something? Aliens maybe? There is a conspiracy about the Titanic. It's something along the lines of this. It's sister ship (the Britanic I think) was involved in a collision before the Titanic set sail. The collision seriously damaged the ship but it did not sink, however it was for all intents a write off. The owner switched the ships and deliberately sank the Britannic, which they claimed was the Titanic, and got a meeting much bigger insurance claim for it. I'm quoting this conspiracy from memory so may not have got everything about it completely right. Needless to say I think it's total rubbish but the conspiracy theory does exist. The keel for Britannic was laid on 30 November 1911 at the Harland and Wolff shipyard in Belfast, 13 months after the launch of the Olympic. Due to improvements introduced as a consequence of the Titanic disaster, Britannic was not launched until 26 February 1914, which was filmed along with the fitting of a funnel.[10] Fitting out began subsequently. She was constructed in the same gantry slip used to build RMS Olympic. Reusing Olympic??'?s space saved the shipyard time and money by not clearing out a third slip similar in size to those used for Olympic and Titanic. In August 1914, before Britannic could commence transatlantic service between New York and Southampton, the First World War began. Immediately, all shipyards with Admiralty contracts were given top priority to use available raw materials. All civil contracts (including the Britannic) were slowed down. The naval authorities requisitioned a large number of ships as armed merchant cruisers or for troop transport. The Admiralty was paying the companies for the use of their ships but the risk of losing a ship in naval operations was high. However, the big ocean liners were not taken for naval use, because the smaller ships were much easier to operate. White Star decided to withdraw RMS Olympic from service until the danger had passed. RMS Olympic returned to Belfast on 3 November 1914, while work on her sister continued slowly. All this would change in 1915. "Like I said I was quoting the conspiracy from memory. Have just googled it and the conspiracy was with the Olympic and Titanic rather than the Britannic and Titanic. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just seen the Freemasons covered up not only the Sinking of the Titanic but also Jack the Ripper. I wonder what else this group of shopkeepers and accountants did. Any ideas I'm going with Shergar and Kaspar Hauser. What was covered up about the sinking of the Titanic? Pretty straight forward really. Ship going too fast in dangerous waters, was not carrying enough lifeboats, hit iceberg and sank. Nearest ship failed to respond to distress flares (which was missed out by the Winslet/DeCaprio movie) and around 1200 died. All of that came out in the subsequent enquiry. Have I missed something? Aliens maybe? There is a conspiracy about the Titanic. It's something along the lines of this. It's sister ship (the Britanic I think) was involved in a collision before the Titanic set sail. The collision seriously damaged the ship but it did not sink, however it was for all intents a write off. The owner switched the ships and deliberately sank the Britannic, which they claimed was the Titanic, and got a meeting much bigger insurance claim for it. I'm quoting this conspiracy from memory so may not have got everything about it completely right. Needless to say I think it's total rubbish but the conspiracy theory does exist. The keel for Britannic was laid on 30 November 1911 at the Harland and Wolff shipyard in Belfast, 13 months after the launch of the Olympic. Due to improvements introduced as a consequence of the Titanic disaster, Britannic was not launched until 26 February 1914, which was filmed along with the fitting of a funnel.[10] Fitting out began subsequently. She was constructed in the same gantry slip used to build RMS Olympic. Reusing Olympic??'?s space saved the shipyard time and money by not clearing out a third slip similar in size to those used for Olympic and Titanic. In August 1914, before Britannic could commence transatlantic service between New York and Southampton, the First World War began. Immediately, all shipyards with Admiralty contracts were given top priority to use available raw materials. All civil contracts (including the Britannic) were slowed down. The naval authorities requisitioned a large number of ships as armed merchant cruisers or for troop transport. The Admiralty was paying the companies for the use of their ships but the risk of losing a ship in naval operations was high. However, the big ocean liners were not taken for naval use, because the smaller ships were much easier to operate. White Star decided to withdraw RMS Olympic from service until the danger had passed. RMS Olympic returned to Belfast on 3 November 1914, while work on her sister continued slowly. All this would change in 1915.
Don't take this the wrong way but that sounded like a childhood memory?
(Mods joking) "Disproved the theory thats what matters not my age. Which I am quite comfortable with by the way, I hope that you are having as much fun when you achieve 65yo, or at least learn to subtract. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Of course I'd only know for sure if I was a mason and if I was I shouldn't and wouldn't say. I am, however, free to say I am Catholic. Generally Masons don't say ... However you can generally tell as there is a demeanour about them unless they are wearing their cuff links of course .... I have not met one Freemason who was not a gent .... As the gentleman said they are a society that hold secrets not a secret society X " I had a mason get sick on my carpet and he told me to go fuck myself when I ask him to pay for it to be cleaned. Now of course I am not slandering all masons because of this incident but it shows that they are not all gents. I have a few other takes of masons bad behaviour. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just seen the Freemasons covered up not only the Sinking of the Titanic but also Jack the Ripper. I wonder what else this group of shopkeepers and accountants did. Any ideas I'm going with Shergar and Kaspar Hauser. What was covered up about the sinking of the Titanic? Pretty straight forward really. Ship going too fast in dangerous waters, was not carrying enough lifeboats, hit iceberg and sank. Nearest ship failed to respond to distress flares (which was missed out by the Winslet/DeCaprio movie) and around 1200 died. All of that came out in the subsequent enquiry. Have I missed something? Aliens maybe? There is a conspiracy about the Titanic. It's something along the lines of this. It's sister ship (the Britanic I think) was involved in a collision before the Titanic set sail. The collision seriously damaged the ship but it did not sink, however it was for all intents a write off. The owner switched the ships and deliberately sank the Britannic, which they claimed was the Titanic, and got a meeting much bigger insurance claim for it. I'm quoting this conspiracy from memory so may not have got everything about it completely right. Needless to say I think it's total rubbish but the conspiracy theory does exist. The keel for Britannic was laid on 30 November 1911 at the Harland and Wolff shipyard in Belfast, 13 months after the launch of the Olympic. Due to improvements introduced as a consequence of the Titanic disaster, Britannic was not launched until 26 February 1914, which was filmed along with the fitting of a funnel.[10] Fitting out began subsequently. She was constructed in the same gantry slip used to build RMS Olympic. Reusing Olympic??'?s space saved the shipyard time and money by not clearing out a third slip similar in size to those used for Olympic and Titanic. In August 1914, before Britannic could commence transatlantic service between New York and Southampton, the First World War began. Immediately, all shipyards with Admiralty contracts were given top priority to use available raw materials. All civil contracts (including the Britannic) were slowed down. The naval authorities requisitioned a large number of ships as armed merchant cruisers or for troop transport. The Admiralty was paying the companies for the use of their ships but the risk of losing a ship in naval operations was high. However, the big ocean liners were not taken for naval use, because the smaller ships were much easier to operate. White Star decided to withdraw RMS Olympic from service until the danger had passed. RMS Olympic returned to Belfast on 3 November 1914, while work on her sister continued slowly. All this would change in 1915.
Don't take this the wrong way but that sounded like a childhood memory?
(Mods joking)
Disproved the theory thats what matters not my age. Which I am quite comfortable with by the way, I hope that you are having as much fun when you achieve 65yo, or at least learn to subtract. "Can't argue with  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
I'm certain they're responsible for me losing my house keys the other day too...bastards! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Bunch of posh tossers who think they are better than the rest of us...they only keep their lies secret to make themselves the "elite"... Oink oink!! And you know this for a fact how?" Sorry that's a secret!! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Perhaps the socks are buried on Oak Island? "You would think with what modern science can produce we would have got to the bottom of that hole by know. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Perhaps the socks are buried on Oak Island?
You would think with what modern science can produce we would have got to the bottom of that hole by know. "Current thought is that it's just a sink hole, which is a shame as I liked the idea of it being something more interesting  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Bunch of posh tossers who think they are better than the rest of us...they only keep their lies secret to make themselves the "elite"... Oink oink!! And you know this for a fact how? Sorry that's a secret!!" What a surprise!! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Bunch of posh tossers who think they are better than the rest of us...they only keep their lies secret to make themselves the "elite"... Oink oink!!" # aw di dums did they not let you in?. My dad is a mason, infact he's gone very high through the ranks, he's far from a posh tosser, he doesn't think he's elite however he is very proud of the hundred of thousands of pound his lodge have raised for charity. Could you possibly say the same??? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Perhaps the socks are buried on Oak Island?
You would think with what modern science can produce we would have got to the bottom of that hole by know.
Current thought is that it's just a sink hole, which is a shame as I liked the idea of it being something more interesting "Don't be so ridiculous. It's obviously a conspiracy of the rich and powerful. They have access to everyone's home because they own all lock, security and alarm companies. They send their agents into peoples home while their at work and steel their socks and other underwear from out of their laundry baskets and send them to China for recycling. This has the double advantage keeping up demand for socks and underwear whilst providing a cheap source of raw material for the sock and underwear manufacturing processes. All this is at the expense of the hard working families. It's a disgrace and the sooner everyone wakes up to what's really going on in the world the sooner we'll be able to put it alright. And of course all these rich and powerful people are Freemasons. Bloody disgusting. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
""Alex Jones" some may not like him but he has a good look at the masons it is very interesting and the questioning and exposing of anyone in power should not be ridiculed. " He's a bit of a douche to be fair. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
""Alex Jones" some may not like him but he has a good look at the masons it is very interesting and the questioning and exposing of anyone in power should not be ridiculed. " Alex Jones? Pahahaha! That dude should be ridiculed on a daily basis!  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
""Alex Jones" some may not like him but he has a good look at the masons it is very interesting and the questioning and exposing of anyone in power should not be ridiculed. Alex Jones? Pahahaha! That dude should be ridiculed on a daily basis! "Not a fan of him but some of the information is still worthy of investigation. Yes the enlightened ones do rule us via grey law...Maritime law for example. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just seen the Freemasons covered up not only the Sinking of the Titanic but also Jack the Ripper. I wonder what else this group of shopkeepers and accountants did. Any ideas I'm going with Shergar and Kaspar Hauser. What was covered up about the sinking of the Titanic? Pretty straight forward really. Ship going too fast in dangerous waters, was not carrying enough lifeboats, hit iceberg and sank. Nearest ship failed to respond to distress flares (which was missed out by the Winslet/DeCaprio movie) and around 1200 died. All of that came out in the subsequent enquiry. Have I missed something? Aliens maybe? There is a conspiracy about the Titanic. It's something along the lines of this. It's sister ship (the Britanic I think) was involved in a collision before the Titanic set sail. The collision seriously damaged the ship but it did not sink, however it was for all intents a write off. The owner switched the ships and deliberately sank the Britannic, which they claimed was the Titanic, and got a meeting much bigger insurance claim for it. I'm quoting this conspiracy from memory so may not have got everything about it completely right. Needless to say I think it's total rubbish but the conspiracy theory does exist. The keel for Britannic was laid on 30 November 1911 at the Harland and Wolff shipyard in Belfast, 13 months after the launch of the Olympic. Due to improvements introduced as a consequence of the Titanic disaster, Britannic was not launched until 26 February 1914, which was filmed along with the fitting of a funnel.[10] Fitting out began subsequently. She was constructed in the same gantry slip used to build RMS Olympic. Reusing Olympic??'?s space saved the shipyard time and money by not clearing out a third slip similar in size to those used for Olympic and Titanic. In August 1914, before Britannic could commence transatlantic service between New York and Southampton, the First World War began. Immediately, all shipyards with Admiralty contracts were given top priority to use available raw materials. All civil contracts (including the Britannic) were slowed down. The naval authorities requisitioned a large number of ships as armed merchant cruisers or for troop transport. The Admiralty was paying the companies for the use of their ships but the risk of losing a ship in naval operations was high. However, the big ocean liners were not taken for naval use, because the smaller ships were much easier to operate. White Star decided to withdraw RMS Olympic from service until the danger had passed. RMS Olympic returned to Belfast on 3 November 1914, while work on her sister continued slowly. All this would change in 1915. "Just to finish off the story. Britannic never actually completed a Trans Atlantic voyage. She was laid up in Belfast for a while before being converted into a hospital ship and entered service as HMHS Britannic. She was sunk by, most likely, a mine in November 1916 although some still believe she was torpedoed, which if true would have been a war crime. There was a lady (I can't find her name) who survived the sinking of the Titanic and was working as a nurse on board the Britannic. The only person to survive both sinkings. The Olympic had a long career as a liner until she was scrapped in the 1930's. Many of her fittings were bought by the White (Hart or Swan) pub in Alnwick and I believe can still be seen there today. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Oh in that case ,the Freemasons must be behind Covid to ,yawns" I know you are joking but It’s actually been said on the forums that they are! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Oh in that case ,the Freemasons must be behind Covid to ,yawns I know you are joking but It’s actually been said on the forums that they are! "Shakes my head,and gos back to my corner | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Don’t understand the hate for Freemasons to be honest. Do a lot of work for charity. " I'm with you on this. Too many people quick to judge what they know very little about. May be a better thing for those people to go along to an open evening that I'm sure many lodges hold regularly. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just seen the Freemasons covered up not only the Sinking of the Titanic but also Jack the Ripper. I wonder what else this group of shopkeepers and accountants did. Any ideas I'm going with Shergar and Kaspar Hauser. " That's what they make up and want you to believe, but the truth is out there somewhere | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just seen the Freemasons covered up not only the Sinking of the Titanic but also Jack the Ripper. I wonder what else this group of shopkeepers and accountants did. Any ideas I'm going with Shergar and Kaspar Hauser. That's what they make up and want you to believe, but the truth is out there somewhere "I suspect the truth is more mundane. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There used to be a lady on the buses here who'd rant about Free Masons. She's not been seen in a long time. I hope she's ok." Crazy bus lady on Magic Bus?! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I am reading an interesting book about it and it seems that wanted america to be another kind of state and that they were involved in the revolution as well." Now it is referred more to globalists rather than a freemason also did you know that mandela was a 33 degree freemason? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I am reading an interesting book about it and it seems that wanted america to be another kind of state and that they were involved in the revolution as well.Now it is referred more to globalists rather than a freemason also did you know that mandela was a 33 degree freemason?" What's one of those? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I am reading an interesting book about it and it seems that wanted america to be another kind of state and that they were involved in the revolution as well.Now it is referred more to globalists rather than a freemason also did you know that mandela was a 33 degree freemason? What's one of those?" Do you know how Freemasonry works, Tom? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I am reading an interesting book about it and it seems that wanted america to be another kind of state and that they were involved in the revolution as well.Now it is referred more to globalists rather than a freemason also did you know that mandela was a 33 degree freemason? What's one of those? Do you know how Freemasonry works, Tom? " No | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I am reading an interesting book about it and it seems that wanted america to be another kind of state and that they were involved in the revolution as well.Now it is referred more to globalists rather than a freemason also did you know that mandela was a 33 degree freemason? What's one of those? Do you know how Freemasonry works, Tom? No" Try an internet search engine, and much will be revealed. Like what degrees of Freemasonry are | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There used to be a lady on the buses here who'd rant about Free Masons. She's not been seen in a long time. I hope she's ok. Crazy bus lady on Magic Bus?!" That's the one. She was a legend. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There used to be a lady on the buses here who'd rant about Free Masons. She's not been seen in a long time. I hope she's ok. Crazy bus lady on Magic Bus?! That's the one. She was a legend." She was very popular when I was at uni | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"All I know is that it's expensive hobby" Tom, you have the whole internet at your disposal. If you want to know what degrees of Freemasonry are, find out. Do some research. Being informed might enable you to make better contributions to threads. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't trust the net.. " Try the Freemason's own website. They explain things on there. Or try Encyclopedia Britannica or other similarly valid text. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There used to be a lady on the buses here who'd rant about Free Masons. She's not been seen in a long time. I hope she's ok. Crazy bus lady on Magic Bus?! That's the one. She was a legend. She was very popular when I was at uni "Same. I hope she's alright and hasn't gone quiet for bad reasons | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Very expensive hobby.." Yes, buying the hard copies of Encyclopedia Britannica is very expensive, but good news! Someone put it online | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Very expensive hobby.. Yes, buying the hard copies of Encyclopedia Britannica is very expensive, but good news! Someone put it online "I love encyclopaedia rabbit holes. You may also like... four hours later  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Very expensive hobby.. Yes, buying the hard copies of Encyclopedia Britannica is very expensive, but good news! Someone put it online "They are a worthwhile investment, you can’t prop a window open with Wikipedia. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Very expensive hobby.. Yes, buying the hard copies of Encyclopedia Britannica is very expensive, but good news! Someone put it online
They are a worthwhile investment, you can’t prop a window open with Wikipedia. "
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Very expensive hobby.. Yes, buying the hard copies of Encyclopedia Britannica is very expensive, but good news! Someone put it online
They are a worthwhile investment, you can’t prop a window open with Wikipedia. "We tried actually. I'm still trying to explain to work why my laptop needs replacing | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I am reading an interesting book about it and it seems that wanted america to be another kind of state and that they were involved in the revolution as well.Now it is referred more to globalists rather than a freemason also did you know that mandela was a 33 degree freemason? What's one of those?" It is the teachings and practices of the secret fraternal (men only) order of free and accepted masons, the largest worldwide secret society. I also looked at a video of the dark side of it called the janus effect it was in swedish, there russia was involved, communism and world leaders, there are lots of signs like the eye and buildings also the greeting with the left hand up in the air with the fist, it was interesting as well. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Conspiracists who ' read stuff off the net' with absolutely no real volume or structure are way more dangerous than anyone in the FM .. Also its a lot easier to get involved now than ever.. just ask a mason anything and they will tell you what you want to know .. Kind of shuts up the conspiracy merchants " Does the official website of the Freemasons not contain truthful statements then? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's expensive to progress " How much does it cost? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's expensive to progress How much does it cost?" It's very very expensive | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just seen the Freemasons covered up not only the Sinking of the Titanic but also Jack the Ripper. I wonder what else this group of shopkeepers and accountants did. Any ideas I'm going with Shergar and Kaspar Hauser. " Utter bollocks! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Conspiracists who ' read stuff off the net' with absolutely no real volume or structure are way more dangerous than anyone in the FM .. Also its a lot easier to get involved now than ever.. just ask a mason anything and they will tell you what you want to know .. Kind of shuts up the conspiracy merchants Does the official website of the Freemasons not contain truthful statements then? " Not sure what youmean ? you wont find anything about Covid, shergar or the Titanic on there thats for sure .. pretty much everything else is as is though I shouldnt wonder | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Conspiracists who ' read stuff off the net' with absolutely no real volume or structure are way more dangerous than anyone in the FM .. Also its a lot easier to get involved now than ever.. just ask a mason anything and they will tell you what you want to know .. Kind of shuts up the conspiracy merchants " Depends on the stuff online. Unfortunately quality control isn't a thing on the internet in general | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't trust the net.. " And yet here you are posting on it.
Most of your thread posts are nonsense off the net.
E | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just seen the Freemasons covered up not only the Sinking of the Titanic but also Jack the Ripper. I wonder what else this group of shopkeepers and accountants did. Any ideas I'm going with Shergar and Kaspar Hauser. What was covered up about the sinking of the Titanic? Pretty straight forward really. Ship going too fast in dangerous waters, was not carrying enough lifeboats, hit iceberg and sank. Nearest ship failed to respond to distress flares (which was missed out by the Winslet/DeCaprio movie) and around 1200 died. All of that came out in the subsequent enquiry. Have I missed something? Aliens maybe? No you haven't missed anything. Freemasons actually do a huge amount for charitable causes and lots of good work. But they do it quietly. Because there is an air of mystique they are targeted by peeps who really do not understand. Sleep peacefully all." Exactly , Charles Feeny gave his entire fortune of 5 billion to a secret organisation known only as AP for years you could get money for projects through a mysterious lawyer until finally regulators made it all transparent. Often good things have to be done secretly , for good reasons. In the past we’ve done projects and opted to ignore any government funding and just ask rich people we trust to write a check , some are very likely masons , who cares. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't trust the net.. And yet here you are posting on it.
Most of your thread posts are nonsense off the net.
E" | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's expensive to progress How much does it cost?" Could you possibly quantify? I’m genuinely interested. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's expensive to progress How much does it cost? Could you possibly quantify? I’m genuinely interested." Might be wrong but my understanding is that it depends on each lodge but I'd say £100 to £300 annual fees plus you pay for monthly meals £20 ish. Donation to charity is probably a minimum £25-50 when you're new but rises with progression However it's always supposed to be linked to your means rather than a fixed fee. Plus appropriate clothing regalia cost | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
being a freemason isn't a secret
I also wouldn't believe half the stuff they say on the internet as it's against
masonic rules to reveal anything on anything that can be read | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just seen the Freemasons covered up not only the Sinking of the Titanic but also Jack the Ripper. I wonder what else this group of shopkeepers and accountants did. Any ideas I'm going with Shergar and Kaspar Hauser. What was covered up about the sinking of the Titanic? Pretty straight forward really. Ship going too fast in dangerous waters, was not carrying enough lifeboats, hit iceberg and sank. Nearest ship failed to respond to distress flares (which was missed out by the Winslet/DeCaprio movie) and around 1200 died. All of that came out in the subsequent enquiry. Have I missed something? Aliens maybe? There is a conspiracy about the Titanic. It's something along the lines of this. It's sister ship (the Britanic I think) was involved in a collision before the Titanic set sail. The collision seriously damaged the ship but it did not sink, however it was for all intents a write off. The owner switched the ships and deliberately sank the Britannic, which they claimed was the Titanic, and got a meeting much bigger insurance claim for it. I'm quoting this conspiracy from memory so may not have got everything about it completely right. Needless to say I think it's total rubbish but the conspiracy theory does exist." I heard this through someone's dad who worked for the insurance company | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Wasnt a freemason found hing under a bridge in London once? " Think that was the 'gods banker' one if it was Hammersmith..? One of the chief Vatican finance managers allegedly some iffy deals went on.. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Wasnt a freemason found hing under a bridge in London once? Think that was the 'gods banker' one if it was Hammersmith..? One of the chief Vatican finance managers allegedly some iffy deals went on.." Correction, Blackfriars.. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There used to be a lady on the buses here who'd rant about Free Masons. She's not been seen in a long time. I hope she's ok." I love on the buses, I'll ave you butler neeeeeeeghhhh | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just seen the Freemasons covered up not only the Sinking of the Titanic but also Jack the Ripper. I wonder what else this group of shopkeepers and accountants did. Any ideas I'm going with Shergar and Kaspar Hauser. What was covered up about the sinking of the Titanic? Pretty straight forward really. Ship going too fast in dangerous waters, was not carrying enough lifeboats, hit iceberg and sank. Nearest ship failed to respond to distress flares (which was missed out by the Winslet/DeCaprio movie) and around 1200 died. All of that came out in the subsequent enquiry. Have I missed something? Aliens maybe? There is a conspiracy about the Titanic. It's something along the lines of this. It's sister ship (the Britanic I think) was involved in a collision before the Titanic set sail. The collision seriously damaged the ship but it did not sink, however it was for all intents a write off. The owner switched the ships and deliberately sank the Britannic, which they claimed was the Titanic, and got a meeting much bigger insurance claim for it. I'm quoting this conspiracy from memory so may not have got everything about it completely right. Needless to say I think it's total rubbish but the conspiracy theory does exist. Did not the loss of the rich bankers on board allow the private Federal Reserve to be quietly brought into existence by Rothchild and co. Remember reading something along those lines " There were three powerful bankers who were apposed to Rothschilds federal banking and met their death aboard the titanic in 1912. The federal reserve act came in 1913 without any resistance. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I am reading an interesting book about it and it seems that wanted america to be another kind of state and that they were involved in the revolution as well.Now it is referred more to globalists rather than a freemason also did you know that mandela was a 33 degree freemason?" Mandela was a knight of Malta along with Blair. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I am reading an interesting book about it and it seems that wanted america to be another kind of state and that they were involved in the revolution as well.Now it is referred more to globalists rather than a freemason also did you know that mandela was a 33 degree freemason? Mandela was a knight of Malta along with Blair." Yes he was and blair and as well other world leaders too. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's expensive to progress How much does it cost? Could you possibly quantify? I’m genuinely interested. Might be wrong but my understanding is that it depends on each lodge but I'd say £100 to £300 annual fees plus you pay for monthly meals £20 ish. Donation to charity is probably a minimum £25-50 when you're new but rises with progression However it's always supposed to be linked to your means rather than a fixed fee. Plus appropriate clothing regalia cost " You are right about the annual fees and meals costs but the charity donation is personal and private. There is no set amount and you give what you can when you can. It is dependant on your own circumstances and definitely not linked to your means or income. So it could be £1 or £100- your personal choice. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I am reading an interesting book about it and it seems that wanted america to be another kind of state and that they were involved in the revolution as well.Now it is referred more to globalists rather than a freemason also did you know that mandela was a 33 degree freemason? What's one of those? Do you know how Freemasonry works, Tom? No Try an internet search engine, and much will be revealed. Like what degrees of Freemasonry are "Is it like Boy Scout badges? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just seen the Freemasons covered up not only the Sinking of the Titanic but also Jack the Ripper. I wonder what else this group of shopkeepers and accountants did. Any ideas I'm going with Shergar and Kaspar Hauser. What was covered up about the sinking of the Titanic? Pretty straight forward really. Ship going too fast in dangerous waters, was not carrying enough lifeboats, hit iceberg and sank. Nearest ship failed to respond to distress flares (which was missed out by the Winslet/DeCaprio movie) and around 1200 died. All of that came out in the subsequent enquiry. Have I missed something? Aliens maybe? There is a conspiracy about the Titanic. It's something along the lines of this. It's sister ship (the Britanic I think) was involved in a collision before the Titanic set sail. The collision seriously damaged the ship but it did not sink, however it was for all intents a write off. The owner switched the ships and deliberately sank the Britannic, which they claimed was the Titanic, and got a meeting much bigger insurance claim for it. I'm quoting this conspiracy from memory so may not have got everything about it completely right. Needless to say I think it's total rubbish but the conspiracy theory does exist. Did not the loss of the rich bankers on board allow the private Federal Reserve to be quietly brought into existence by Rothchild and co. Remember reading something along those lines There were three powerful bankers who were apposed to Rothschilds federal banking and met their death aboard the titanic in 1912. The federal reserve act came in 1913 without any resistance." So the Rothschilds decided to kill off 3 opponents by dragging an iceberg in front of the Titanic. They made sure that the ship was travelling too fast and also making sure that the water was exceptionally calm so the lookouts wouldn't see it in time. They then made sure that 5 compartments were flooded (she would have stayed afloat with 4 or less) and took a bet that the captain and crew of the nearest ship were all asleep. After doing all of that they then ensured that their opponents wouldn't be able to get into a lifeboat. I'm sure that even in 1912 there were much easier ways to take out the opposition. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just seen the Freemasons covered up not only the Sinking of the Titanic but also Jack the Ripper. I wonder what else this group of shopkeepers and accountants did. Any ideas I'm going with Shergar and Kaspar Hauser. "
Conspiracy theories I love them | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ive been a mason for 8 years, my family have been for 40 odd years (Taurus). It does make me laugh seen the tin hat brigade with their conspiracies. We rais a colossal amount of money for charity, support eachother & throw bloody good parties. Theres no titanic cover ups or any of that clap trap " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ive been a mason for 8 years, my family have been for 40 odd years (Taurus). It does make me laugh seen the tin hat brigade with their conspiracies. We rais a colossal amount of money for charity, support eachother & throw bloody good parties. Theres no titanic cover ups or any of that clap trap
" | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Still wont let a catholic join though. Won't they? Can't say I know much about them to be honest "Complete rubbish about Catholics | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Bunch of posh tossers who think they are better than the rest of us...they only keep their lies secret to make themselves the "elite"... Oink oink!!" Speaking from a position of total ignorance there then | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They keep breaking into our house and stealing all the biscuits in the biscuit tin. Then OCD thinks it was me who ate them all and threatens me with a diet." Got it. Now I know who puts fingerprints all over my glasses when I'm sleeping and who nicks all the odd socks from the washing. Pesky bloody Masons. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ive been a mason for 8 years, my family have been for 40 odd years (Taurus). It does make me laugh seen the tin hat brigade with their conspiracies. We rais a colossal amount of money for charity, support eachother & throw bloody good parties. Theres no titanic cover ups or any of that clap trap
" | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just seen the Freemasons covered up not only the Sinking of the Titanic but also Jack the Ripper. I wonder what else this group of shopkeepers and accountants did. Any ideas I'm going with Shergar and Kaspar Hauser. What was covered up about the sinking of the Titanic? Pretty straight forward really. Ship going too fast in dangerous waters, was not carrying enough lifeboats, hit iceberg and sank. Nearest ship failed to respond to distress flares (which was missed out by the Winslet/DeCaprio movie) and around 1200 died. All of that came out in the subsequent enquiry. Have I missed something? Aliens maybe? There is a conspiracy about the Titanic. It's something along the lines of this. It's sister ship (the Britanic I think) was involved in a collision before the Titanic set sail. The collision seriously damaged the ship but it did not sink, however it was for all intents a write off. The owner switched the ships and deliberately sank the Britannic, which they claimed was the Titanic, and got a meeting much bigger insurance claim for it. I'm quoting this conspiracy from memory so may not have got everything about it completely right. Needless to say I think it's total rubbish but the conspiracy theory does exist. Did not the loss of the rich bankers on board allow the private Federal Reserve to be quietly brought into existence by Rothchild and co. Remember reading something along those lines There were three powerful bankers who were apposed to Rothschilds federal banking and met their death aboard the titanic in 1912. The federal reserve act came in 1913 without any resistance." With the arrival of the Internet came a change in the use some words in the English language. The word "coincidence" was set aside almost never to be used again and in most cases it was substituted by "conspiracy". In any event there are always winners and loosers. It does not necessarily mean the winners orchestrated the event. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just seen the Freemasons covered up not only the Sinking of the Titanic but also Jack the Ripper. I wonder what else this group of shopkeepers and accountants did. Any ideas I'm going with Shergar and Kaspar Hauser. What was covered up about the sinking of the Titanic? Pretty straight forward really. Ship going too fast in dangerous waters, was not carrying enough lifeboats, hit iceberg and sank. Nearest ship failed to respond to distress flares (which was missed out by the Winslet/DeCaprio movie) and around 1200 died. All of that came out in the subsequent enquiry. Have I missed something? Aliens maybe?" Yes! ONLY a Freemason has an ego large enough to build a huge ship and call it unsinkable...the rest of us (you) would never do that!! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just seen the Freemasons covered up not only the Sinking of the Titanic but also Jack the Ripper. I wonder what else this group of shopkeepers and accountants did. Any ideas I'm going with Shergar and Kaspar Hauser. What was covered up about the sinking of the Titanic? Pretty straight forward really. Ship going too fast in dangerous waters, was not carrying enough lifeboats, hit iceberg and sank. Nearest ship failed to respond to distress flares (which was missed out by the Winslet/DeCaprio movie) and around 1200 died. All of that came out in the subsequent enquiry. Have I missed something? Aliens maybe? Yes! ONLY a Freemason has an ego large enough to build a huge ship and call it unsinkable...the rest of us (you) would never do that!!" You are correct. Most people criticise everything yet themselves do absolutely nothing. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just seen the Freemasons covered up not only the Sinking of the Titanic but also Jack the Ripper. I wonder what else this group of shopkeepers and accountants did. Any ideas I'm going with Shergar and Kaspar Hauser. What was covered up about the sinking of the Titanic? Pretty straight forward really. Ship going too fast in dangerous waters, was not carrying enough lifeboats, hit iceberg and sank. Nearest ship failed to respond to distress flares (which was missed out by the Winslet/DeCaprio movie) and around 1200 died. All of that came out in the subsequent enquiry. Have I missed something? Aliens maybe? There is a conspiracy about the Titanic. It's something along the lines of this. It's sister ship (the Britanic I think) was involved in a collision before the Titanic set sail. The collision seriously damaged the ship but it did not sink, however it was for all intents a write off. The owner switched the ships and deliberately sank the Britannic, which they claimed was the Titanic, and got a meeting much bigger insurance claim for it. I'm quoting this conspiracy from memory so may not have got everything about it completely right. Needless to say I think it's total rubbish but the conspiracy theory does exist." Indeed. It is total nonsense. How could you arrange for an ocean going liner to "accidentally" hit an iceberg in the middle of the Atlantic ocean, in total darkness ? It would have been as black as your hat, to coin an old fashioned saying. I think the sister ship that was previously badly damaged, was the Olympic ? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just seen the Freemasons covered up not only the Sinking of the Titanic but also Jack the Ripper. I wonder what else this group of shopkeepers and accountants did. Any ideas I'm going with Shergar and Kaspar Hauser. What was covered up about the sinking of the Titanic? Pretty straight forward really. Ship going too fast in dangerous waters, was not carrying enough lifeboats, hit iceberg and sank. Nearest ship failed to respond to distress flares (which was missed out by the Winslet/DeCaprio movie) and around 1200 died. All of that came out in the subsequent enquiry. Have I missed something? Aliens maybe? There is a conspiracy about the Titanic. It's something along the lines of this. It's sister ship (the Britanic I think) was involved in a collision before the Titanic set sail. The collision seriously damaged the ship but it did not sink, however it was for all intents a write off. The owner switched the ships and deliberately sank the Britannic, which they claimed was the Titanic, and got a meeting much bigger insurance claim for it. I'm quoting this conspiracy from memory so may not have got everything about it completely right. Needless to say I think it's total rubbish but the conspiracy theory does exist. Did not the loss of the rich bankers on board allow the private Federal Reserve to be quietly brought into existence by Rothchild and co. Remember reading something along those lines There were three powerful bankers who were apposed to Rothschilds federal banking and met their death aboard the titanic in 1912. The federal reserve act came in 1913 without any resistance." Is there anything in the world left to blame Jewish people for?! Fuck sake. Stop already! *Rolls away, muttering* | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just seen the Freemasons covered up not only the Sinking of the Titanic but also Jack the Ripper. I wonder what else this group of shopkeepers and accountants did. Any ideas I'm going with Shergar and Kaspar Hauser. What was covered up about the sinking of the Titanic? Pretty straight forward really. Ship going too fast in dangerous waters, was not carrying enough lifeboats, hit iceberg and sank. Nearest ship failed to respond to distress flares (which was missed out by the Winslet/DeCaprio movie) and around 1200 died. All of that came out in the subsequent enquiry. Have I missed something? Aliens maybe? There is a conspiracy about the Titanic. It's something along the lines of this. It's sister ship (the Britanic I think) was involved in a collision before the Titanic set sail. The collision seriously damaged the ship but it did not sink, however it was for all intents a write off. The owner switched the ships and deliberately sank the Britannic, which they claimed was the Titanic, and got a meeting much bigger insurance claim for it. I'm quoting this conspiracy from memory so may not have got everything about it completely right. Needless to say I think it's total rubbish but the conspiracy theory does exist. Did not the loss of the rich bankers on board allow the private Federal Reserve to be quietly brought into existence by Rothchild and co. Remember reading something along those lines There were three powerful bankers who were apposed to Rothschilds federal banking and met their death aboard the titanic in 1912. The federal reserve act came in 1913 without any resistance. Is there anything in the world left to blame Jewish people for?! Fuck sake. Stop already! *Rolls away, muttering*" #notalljewishpeople | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Still wont let a catholic join though. Won't they? Can't say I know much about them to be honest
Complete rubbish about Catholics"A pal of mine told me that it was the Vatican who decreed that Catholics shouldn't become freemasons because, by not letting them become freemasons it meant that any disposable income they had could be diverted back into the Catholic church, not freemasons charities. It wouldn't surprise me if it was true as an Irish Catholic welder I worked with told me that the Catholic church was now letting them eat meat on a Friday because, the price of fish had gone so expensive that by letting the flock eat sausages on a Friday it meant that they would have more change in their pockets for the collection plate on a Sunday. Anything to keep raising money for pope mobile's and tbe like was what he reckoned. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The Titanic was in Trouble as it left UK a coal bunker was on fire. If they had steered the Titanic back to the iceberg they could have tied on to it and off loaded passengers on to it and stayed a float longer as ice floats. People were leaving the UK and Europe in droves to start a lucrative life in America they needed to stop this. Someone wanted that ship sunk. As for Jack, he was an ex army guy who left under embarrassing circumstances, he killed ladies of the night because he contracted an STD and took his anger out on them. Apparently a letter found in a book years later named the chap." The fire in the coal bunker is pretty well documented but those kind of fires were not uncommon on ships of that time. As for tying up to the iceberg
I've never heard such rubbish in my life.
Even if you disregard all the other difficulties (and there would be many) it would have been impossible to get alongside (or even find) the berg let alone unload people on to it.
Do you think that you can stop nigh on 50,000 tons of steel moving at over 20 knots on a sixpence? By the time the Titanic had come to a stop the iceberg would have been miles behind.
Add to that it was pitch black dark and her boiler rooms were flooding.
%0,000 ton ships with no power are not very good at handbrake turns. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You forgot Lord Lucan and Shergar " Wasn't Lucan see serving in a McDonalds in Blackburn, well that is what the Sport newspaper last said he was. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just seen the Freemasons covered up not only the Sinking of the Titanic but also Jack the Ripper. I wonder what else this group of shopkeepers and accountants did. Any ideas I'm going with Shergar and Kaspar Hauser. What was covered up about the sinking of the Titanic? Pretty straight forward really. Ship going too fast in dangerous waters, was not carrying enough lifeboats, hit iceberg and sank. Nearest ship failed to respond to distress flares (which was missed out by the Winslet/DeCaprio movie) and around 1200 died. All of that came out in the subsequent enquiry. Have I missed something? Aliens maybe?" Wasn't it done because there were people opposing the federal banking act going through on it? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 cloak n dagger. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
