FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

poor grammar

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

I was in a park in Nottingham recently and there were bins for litter and dog mess. They were all labelled that they were duel purpose bins...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *harpDressed ManMan
over a year ago

Here occasionally, but mostly somewhere else

Don't touche them...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Don't touche them..."

funny as

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *anchestercubMan
over a year ago

manchester & NI

The irony of this thread is that it's a spelling error and not a grammatical error.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Don't touche them..."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Don't touche them..."

Take a bow good sir

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire

dual purpose is fine, dual porpoise is a bit worrying..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"The irony of this thread is that it's a spelling error and not a grammatical error.

"

I did consider that before posting. But it is not just a typo, it is the use of completely the wrong word. Which would, I suppose, make it neither a grammatical or typographical error. Just mild illiteracy.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"dual purpose is fine, dual porpoise is a bit worrying.."

But duel porpoise is completely out of the question.

How would they hold their flintlock pistols? How would they keep the gunpowder dry? Would the shot not slow down underwater?

See what you've done now? Too many questions.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aucy tiggerWoman
over a year ago

Back where I belong


"dual purpose is fine, dual porpoise is a bit worrying..

But duel porpoise is completely out of the question.

How would they hold their flintlock pistols? How would they keep the gunpowder dry? Would the shot not slow down underwater?

See what you've done now? Too many questions. "

Well if they did manage to shoot at each other, that would send the shit flying lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *smCouple
over a year ago

Liskeard

Poor grammar .

Hope she feels better soon

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inky-MinxWoman
over a year ago

Grantham


"The irony of this thread is that it's a spelling error and not a grammatical error.

"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ranny-CrumpetWoman
over a year ago

The Town by The Cross


"dual purpose is fine, dual porpoise is a bit worrying.."

Jewel porpoise = pearls before mereswine

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *risky_MareWoman
over a year ago

...Up on the Downs


"Don't touche them..."

Haha!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Did you fight them off? Mr W

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Good grammar - "The difference between knowing your shit - and knowing you're shit"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top