FabSwingers.com forum: Under cover policing

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

The Met have just agreed compensation claims from a number of women who were befriend by under cover police and in some cases had children by these officers who had families themselves.

Given the recent events in Paris are any or all overt or covert security operations justified?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *dwalu2Couple
over a year ago

Bristol

Those ones weren't. Some will be. Don't trust the police to decide the difference, independent oversight is required.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It's a bit weird thinking it's alright to fuck women and get them pregnant just to maintain a cover. Hopefully they'll also be reprimanded severely.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"It's a bit weird thinking it's alright to fuck women and get them pregnant just to maintain a cover. Hopefully they'll also be reprimanded severely. "
the CPS have said no charges can be brought due to various evidential and security reasons

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"It's a bit weird thinking it's alright to fuck women and get them pregnant just to maintain a cover. Hopefully they'll also be reprimanded severely. the CPS have said no charges can be brought due to various evidential and security reasons"

They can still be reprimanded professionally. For example, I could get a warning at work for calling someone an idiot but it's not a prosecutable crime.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *enny PR9TV/TS
over a year ago

Southport

Isn't this deception, I'm sure the women wouldn't have consented to sex if they have known the truth. We've seen a woman get 8 years for deceiving another woman into thinking she was a man, isn't this in the same category, or do they think we all know that men are lying bastards and only women can be trusted to always tell the truth in a relationship.

Just strikes me as having double standards in the eyes of the law.

Jenny xxx

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

Just strikes me as having double standards in the eyes of the law.

Jenny xxx "
this is my point

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

So,they had sex under false pretenses,and now a child has a father who knows his dad was just doing his job. That sounds more than reprimandable to me.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *anchestercubMan
over a year ago

manchester & NI

This highlights the reason the snoopers charter is worrying to me.

The law (authorities) are a law unto themselves.

They can deceive, keep secret, keep hidden anything that they think will give them an end result but find a way to dance around the consequences when it's immoral.

I understand things need to be done by the security services but if a line can't be drawn at fucking and impregnating women then it beggars belief where it can be drawn.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *icked weaselCouple
over a year ago

Near Edinburgh..

"Just strikes me as having double standards in the eyes of the law."

Legalised Rape !!!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Just strikes me as having double standards in the eyes of the law.

Jenny xxx "

That case makes my head spin to be honest. On one hand I think "well maybe it's one of those things that sounds ridiculous until it happens to you" and then on the other hand I think "seriously, you couldn't tell the difference between skin and a prosthetic penis?"

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"So,they had sex under false pretenses,and now a child has a father who knows his dad was just doing his job. That sounds more than reprimandable to me. "

A lot of officers will receive immunities from certain things so it's not likely to be a criminal issue.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *aneandpaulCouple
over a year ago

cleveleys

Why do people open threads and talk crap

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It is both repulsive and repugnant

Not just the officers but the civil servants and ministers who promoted this should be prosecuted

We talk of invasions of privacy these days in terms of having your internet history monitored.

Imagine loving someone, having them inside you, bearing children with them, giving them your all and then finding out it meant nothing to them. None of it. Except maybe a report.

In fact, don't, because it doesn't bear thinking about.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

You know, some folk are acting like this was the first time a man was caught lying to a woman to get his end away.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *icky999Man
over a year ago

warrington

who were they investigating, librarians?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *iamondjoeMan
over a year ago

Glastonbury

"who were they investigating, librarians?

They had long-term undercover operations to infiltrate radical political or social causes, such as environmental campaigns, anarchy and animal rights.

I'm sure you can use Google.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"You know, some folk are acting like this was the first time a man was caught lying to a woman to get his end away.

That's why I don't really see why it's criminal, in the sense of rape claims. They just lied, like every cheat on here. It's abhorrent, but not really illegal imo.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *iamondjoeMan
over a year ago

Glastonbury

*Cracks knuckles*

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *iamondjoeMan
over a year ago

Glastonbury

"You know, some folk are acting like this was the first time a man was caught lying to a woman to get his end away.

That's why I don't really see why it's criminal, in the sense of rape claims. They just lied, like every cheat on here. It's abhorrent, but not really illegal imo. "

Because he was an officer of the law, at work on a mission to uncover something supposedly vital to national security - not there to get his end away and start a family with some unsuspecting bint.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"You know, some folk are acting like this was the first time a man was caught lying to a woman to get his end away.

That's why I don't really see why it's criminal, in the sense of rape claims. They just lied, like every cheat on here. It's abhorrent, but not really illegal imo. "

Because it was institutionally sponsored

There is a difference between a person having a bit on the side and something that has its roots at an institutional level.

Both distasteful but on wholly different level

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 20/11/15 22:16:33]

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"You know, some folk are acting like this was the first time a man was caught lying to a woman to get his end away.

That's why I don't really see why it's criminal, in the sense of rape claims. They just lied, like every cheat on here. It's abhorrent, but not really illegal imo.

Because he was an officer of the law, at work on a mission to uncover something supposedly vital to national security - not there to get his end away and start a family with some unsuspecting bint. "

Caveat emptor? - since we're getting all Latin in the house

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Six figure payouts for the ladies and book deals for the Officers involved.

It's a mad world

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"You know, some folk are acting like this was the first time a man was caught lying to a woman to get his end away.

That's why I don't really see why it's criminal, in the sense of rape claims. They just lied, like every cheat on here. It's abhorrent, but not really illegal imo.

Because it was institutionally sponsored

There is a difference between a person having a bit on the side and something that has its roots at an institutional level.

Both distasteful but on wholly different level"

Were the officers forced into the relationships as part of the operation? If so, then I understand your point.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"You know, some folk are acting like this was the first time a man was caught lying to a woman to get his end away.

That's why I don't really see why it's criminal, in the sense of rape claims. They just lied, like every cheat on here. It's abhorrent, but not really illegal imo.

Because he was an officer of the law, at work on a mission to uncover something supposedly vital to national security - not there to get his end away and start a family with some unsuspecting bint. "

I don't think it was an okay thing to do, but it's not rape imo. Doesn't appear to be force or threat, and all consensual (albeit it based on lies).

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *iamondjoeMan
over a year ago

Glastonbury

"Because he was an officer of the law, at work on a mission to uncover something supposedly vital to national security - not there to get his end away and start a family with some unsuspecting bint.

I don't think it was an okay thing to do, but it's not rape imo. Doesn't appear to be force or threat, and all consensual (albeit it based on lies). "

Of course it's not rape, but it is an abuse of trust and position. By an officer of the law.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"You know, some folk are acting like this was the first time a man was caught lying to a woman to get his end away.

That's why I don't really see why it's criminal, in the sense of rape claims. They just lied, like every cheat on here. It's abhorrent, but not really illegal imo.

Because he was an officer of the law, at work on a mission to uncover something supposedly vital to national security - not there to get his end away and start a family with some unsuspecting bint.

I don't think it was an okay thing to do, but it's not rape imo. Doesn't appear to be force or threat, and all consensual (albeit it based on lies). "

It was "sexual assault" in the case of a woman gaining consent by pretending to be a man - true story

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

You always see Po Po getting in trouble for having sex on duty. This is much more serious so there should be recourse. However because they have left the job not that much you can do in the eyes of the law. Just leaves the organisation to pick up the pieces.

They should get royally sued.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"You know, some folk are acting like this was the first time a man was caught lying to a woman to get his end away.

That's why I don't really see why it's criminal, in the sense of rape claims. They just lied, like every cheat on here. It's abhorrent, but not really illegal imo.

Because he was an officer of the law, at work on a mission to uncover something supposedly vital to national security - not there to get his end away and start a family with some unsuspecting bint.

I don't think it was an okay thing to do, but it's not rape imo. Doesn't appear to be force or threat, and all consensual (albeit it based on lies).

It was "sexual assault" in the case of a woman gaining consent by pretending to be a man - true story "

Different case and different details though.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Because he was an officer of the law, at work on a mission to uncover something supposedly vital to national security - not there to get his end away and start a family with some unsuspecting bint.

I don't think it was an okay thing to do, but it's not rape imo. Doesn't appear to be force or threat, and all consensual (albeit it based on lies).

Of course it's not rape, but it is an abuse of trust and position. By an officer of the law. "

Yeh that's what I think too

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *icked weaselCouple
over a year ago

Near Edinburgh..

"Of course it's not rape, but it is an abuse of trust and position. By an officer of the law. "

What It Is That.. In A Court ??

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"You know, some folk are acting like this was the first time a man was caught lying to a woman to get his end away.

That's why I don't really see why it's criminal, in the sense of rape claims. They just lied, like every cheat on here. It's abhorrent, but not really illegal imo.

Because he was an officer of the law, at work on a mission to uncover something supposedly vital to national security - not there to get his end away and start a family with some unsuspecting bint.

I don't think it was an okay thing to do, but it's not rape imo. Doesn't appear to be force or threat, and all consensual (albeit it based on lies).

It was "sexual assault" in the case of a woman gaining consent by pretending to be a man - true story

Different case and different details though. "

Isn't the principle that the person wouldn't have given their consent if they'd know the real identity of the person?

As I said earlier, the whole case sends me spinning and I find the verdict rather odd but it is what it is

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"You know, some folk are acting like this was the first time a man was caught lying to a woman to get his end away.

That's why I don't really see why it's criminal, in the sense of rape claims. They just lied, like every cheat on here. It's abhorrent, but not really illegal imo.

Because he was an officer of the law, at work on a mission to uncover something supposedly vital to national security - not there to get his end away and start a family with some unsuspecting bint.

I don't think it was an okay thing to do, but it's not rape imo. Doesn't appear to be force or threat, and all consensual (albeit it based on lies).

It was "sexual assault" in the case of a woman gaining consent by pretending to be a man - true story

Different case and different details though.

Isn't the principle that the person wouldn't have given their consent if they'd know the real identity of the person?

As I said earlier, the whole case sends me spinning and I find the verdict rather odd but it is what it is "

I think the problem there was physical - if the girl was a bloke, it'd never have gone to court. She didn't consent to being fucked with a strap on. She consented to a bloke with a cock.

This one is more civil. They did consent to sex, they just didn't like it when they found out the bloke had lied and felt used by the operation.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *icked weaselCouple
over a year ago

Near Edinburgh..

"This one is more civil. They did consent to sex, they just didn't like it when they found out the bloke had lied and felt used by the operation."

Tantamount to RAPE - is it Not..

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"You know, some folk are acting like this was the first time a man was caught lying to a woman to get his end away.

That's why I don't really see why it's criminal, in the sense of rape claims. They just lied, like every cheat on here. It's abhorrent, but not really illegal imo.

Because he was an officer of the law, at work on a mission to uncover something supposedly vital to national security - not there to get his end away and start a family with some unsuspecting bint.

I don't think it was an okay thing to do, but it's not rape imo. Doesn't appear to be force or threat, and all consensual (albeit it based on lies).

It was "sexual assault" in the case of a woman gaining consent by pretending to be a man - true story

Different case and different details though.

Isn't the principle that the person wouldn't have given their consent if they'd know the real identity of the person?

As I said earlier, the whole case sends me spinning and I find the verdict rather odd but it is what it is

I think the problem there was physical - if the girl was a bloke, it'd never have gone to court. She didn't consent to being fucked with a strap on. She consented to a bloke with a cock.

This one is more civil. They did consent to sex, they just didn't like it when they found out the bloke had lied and felt used by the operation."

Makes sense. I wonder if the pregnancy was planned or not. That's the saddest part of the story from my point of view.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"This one is more civil. They did consent to sex, they just didn't like it when they found out the bloke had lied and felt used by the operation.

Tantamount to RAPE - is it Not..

No. I think to say you're raped just cos a man lied is trivialising rape for rape victims.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *icked weaselCouple
over a year ago

Near Edinburgh..

Its a bit like the female who pretended to be a male.. - what did she get ??

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"You know, some folk are acting like this was the first time a man was caught lying to a woman to get his end away.

That's why I don't really see why it's criminal, in the sense of rape claims. They just lied, like every cheat on here. It's abhorrent, but not really illegal imo.

Because he was an officer of the law, at work on a mission to uncover something supposedly vital to national security - not there to get his end away and start a family with some unsuspecting bint.

I don't think it was an okay thing to do, but it's not rape imo. Doesn't appear to be force or threat, and all consensual (albeit it based on lies).

It was "sexual assault" in the case of a woman gaining consent by pretending to be a man - true story

Different case and different details though.

Isn't the principle that the person wouldn't have given their consent if they'd know the real identity of the person?

As I said earlier, the whole case sends me spinning and I find the verdict rather odd but it is what it is

I think the problem there was physical - if the girl was a bloke, it'd never have gone to court. She didn't consent to being fucked with a strap on. She consented to a bloke with a cock.

This one is more civil. They did consent to sex, they just didn't like it when they found out the bloke had lied and felt used by the operation.

Makes sense. I wonder if the pregnancy was planned or not. That's the saddest part of the story from my point of view. "

I can't believe the male was that stupid, unless he genuinely liked the female and wanted that life. Sad to bring a child into it either way as the situation isn't conducive to a happy life.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"You know, some folk are acting like this was the first time a man was caught lying to a woman to get his end away.

That's why I don't really see why it's criminal, in the sense of rape claims. They just lied, like every cheat on here. It's abhorrent, but not really illegal imo.

Because he was an officer of the law, at work on a mission to uncover something supposedly vital to national security - not there to get his end away and start a family with some unsuspecting bint.

I don't think it was an okay thing to do, but it's not rape imo. Doesn't appear to be force or threat, and all consensual (albeit it based on lies).

It was "sexual assault" in the case of a woman gaining consent by pretending to be a man - true story

Different case and different details though.

Isn't the principle that the person wouldn't have given their consent if they'd know the real identity of the person?

As I said earlier, the whole case sends me spinning and I find the verdict rather odd but it is what it is

I think the problem there was physical - if the girl was a bloke, it'd never have gone to court. She didn't consent to being fucked with a strap on. She consented to a bloke with a cock.

This one is more civil. They did consent to sex, they just didn't like it when they found out the bloke had lied and felt used by the operation.

Makes sense. I wonder if the pregnancy was planned or not. That's the saddest part of the story from my point of view.

I can't believe the male was that stupid, unless he genuinely liked the female and wanted that life."

Even so. If he liked it then he should have put a ring on it.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *enny PR9TV/TS
over a year ago

Southport

This story only came to light when two of the women were having blindfolded sex together when one of their partners bust in on them and said; "Hello, Hello, Hello, what's going on here then".

Jenny xxx

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *at69driveMan
over a year ago

Hertford

"The Met have just agreed compensation claims from a number of women who were befriend by under cover police and in some cases had children by these officers who had families themselves.

Given the recent events in Paris are any or all overt or covert security operations justified?"
. . Did the ladies concerned not see any warning signs on their relationship?. Whilst they feel they they were wronged , they were quite happy to accept compensation , and in the case of a few appear publicly on a TV show.

If they were members od organisation that the police needed to infiltrate on an under cover basis , we can assume that they had little sympathy for the forces if law and order in the first instance.

If we are fighting terrorism , anything is justified . .

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *dwalu2Couple
over a year ago

Bristol

"The Met have just agreed compensation claims from a number of women who were befriend by under cover police and in some cases had children by these officers who had families themselves.

Given the recent events in Paris are any or all overt or covert security operations justified?. . Did the ladies concerned not see any warning signs on their relationship?. Whilst they feel they they were wronged , they were quite happy to accept compensation , and in the case of a few appear publicly on a TV show.

If they were members od organisation that the police needed to infiltrate on an under cover basis , we can assume that they had little sympathy for the forces if law and order in the first instance.

If we are fighting terrorism , anything is justified . ."

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

If we are fighting terrorism , anything is justified . ."

That's probably what they said after the reichstag fire, with translation of course.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

Post new Message to Thread