Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Evolutionist. I'm not sure anyone would even be brave enough to admit to being a creationist in the UK." A bad day out could be the Creationist Museum - Portsmouth http://www.theguardian.com/science/2012/jun/06/evidence-creation-museum | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"If I'm an American, do I have to say creationist?? On that note, can an atheist be a creationist? Can an atheist be an American?!? I've confused myself. Long story short, I'm an evolutionist. -Courtney" Does that mean the Westborough Baptist Church will revoke your membership? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"If I'm an American, do I have to say creationist?? On that note, can an atheist be a creationist? Can an atheist be an American?!? I've confused myself. Long story short, I'm an evolutionist. -Courtney Does that mean the Westborough Baptist Church will revoke your membership? " Not if no one tells them Do you think they'll believe that my opinions have 'evolved'? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Evolutionist. I'm not sure anyone would even be brave enough to admit to being a creationist in the UK. A bad day out could be the Creationist Museum - Portsmouth http://www.theguardian.com/science/2012/jun/06/evidence-creation-museum" My Aunt lives an hour's drive from this very "museum". She was exasperated but not surprised when it opened | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"If I'm an American, do I have to say creationist?? On that note, can an atheist be a creationist? Can an atheist be an American?!? I've confused myself. Long story short, I'm an evolutionist. -Courtney Does that mean the Westborough Baptist Church will revoke your membership? Not if no one tells them Do you think they'll believe that my opinions have 'evolved'? " I think they'll accept your opinion with open arms. They're an open minded bunch of 'people'... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Evolutionist. I'm not sure anyone would even be brave enough to admit to being a creationist in the UK. A bad day out could be the Creationist Museum - Portsmouth http://www.theguardian.com/science/2012/jun/06/evidence-creation-museum My Aunt lives an hour's drive from this very "museum". She was exasperated but not surprised when it opened " is there a big fuck off dinosaur by the entrance? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Does anyone believe that there might be a God here ?" There is God just not a man in the sky with a beard. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Every year I used to go to a county fair in upstate New York. There was a creationist church that would always have an exhibit there. I always went because they gave out free coffee, tea, cake, and cookies. Out in the front of the church they had a huge dinosaur display...that had a saddle on! For the humans who used to, presumably, ride the dinosaurs back in the day. As you do... Coffee and cookies anyone? -Courtney" Forget the coffee and BISCUITS, I wanna ride a dinosaur like Jesus did! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Does anyone believe that there might be a God here ?" I believe it's possible there is something/someone out there that we don't know. We don't actually know how the universe came to be. Sometimes, when i look at what scientists are able to do and how we're progressing i do think we are made in Gods image, but i don't fully know what God is. We are trying to be Gods, creators and controllers of chaos, all the time (some of us are anyway). | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Does anyone believe that there might be a God here ?" God was created by men who wanted an excuse to commit murder, gain enormous wealth and subjugate those with weaker wills. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Does anyone believe that there might be a God here ?" I've just done a username search, definitely no God here | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
"Does anyone believe that there might be a God here ? There is God just not a man in the sky with a beard." Nicecouple can you explain ? What is that you believe in ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Creationists believe, amongst other things, that all life on Earth was created in the last ten thousand years! I mean seriously?! Get a grip! " Would you like a ride on the dinosaur as well? Its all saddled up and waiting -Courtney | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Science does not know how life actually started. Creationists are simply guessing. The evidence for evolution is accepted by some creationists because they see it as being compatible with their beliefs. Some eminent scientists believe the idea of a creator is not inconsistent with their view of science. " True, I'm sure prof stephen hawking even said that the more he learnt about the universe the more he thought someone had designed it. I'm paraphrasing of course. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Science does not know how life actually started. Creationists are simply guessing. The evidence for evolution is accepted by some creationists because they see it as being compatible with their beliefs. Some eminent scientists believe the idea of a creator is not inconsistent with their view of science. " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Weird question for a swinger site: are you a creationist or evolutionist? " well evolution is wrong, where are all the dead mutant species that died off and as for creationism, we know the earth is over 6000 years old as the bbc has repeats that old... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Does anyone believe that there might be a God here ? God was created by men who wanted an excuse to commit murder, gain enormous wealth and subjugate those with weaker wills." Every race through known human history has at some point had a 'God' or two. Does your simple statement cover all of these instances? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"For me, it could go either way. There is proof and 'proof'. Something could have created stuff to evolve...." I see your point but creationists believe the earth is only 6000 years old and we haven't evolved. Even though most Europeans have Neanderthal's genes within us, from our interbreeding. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Does anyone believe that there might be a God here ? I believe it's possible there is something/someone out there that we don't know. We don't actually know how the universe came to be. Sometimes, when i look at what scientists are able to do and how we're progressing i do think we are made in Gods image, but i don't fully know what God is. We are trying to be Gods, creators and controllers of chaos, all the time (some of us are anyway)." I agree. I've never wrote anything off,even though I have no experience of it.Sometimes I do sit and wonder ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Creationists believe, amongst other things, that all life on Earth was created in the last ten thousand years! I mean seriously?! Get a grip! Would you like a ride on the dinosaur as well? Its all saddled up and waiting -Courtney" Like most men on here Courtney, I've got a great urge to see you in jodhpurs! Maybe we could ride together? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Creationists are great fun. I love speaking to them. You just wind them up and let them go. A series of leading questions usually gets them to say more and more ridiculous things that you can pick off. That being said I sat next to an evangelist minister on a flight who was trying to convince me that "God" was everywhere and he told me he had seen a man wash off his tattoos that he had for 30 years. Loony. " That's LSD for you ! Marvellous drug !! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Does anyone believe that there might be a God here ? There is God just not a man in the sky with a beard. Nicecouple can you explain ? What is that you believe in ?" I believe that when someone wrote that God created man in his own image they really meant man created god in his own image. God is us, it's life, it's energy, it's trees, it's oceans. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Science does not know how life actually started. Creationists are simply guessing. The evidence for evolution is accepted by some creationists because they see it as being compatible with their beliefs. Some eminent scientists believe the idea of a creator is not inconsistent with their view of science. True, I'm sure prof stephen hawking even said that the more he learnt about the universe the more he thought someone had designed it. I'm paraphrasing of course." Up until 5 or 6 years ago Hawkins believed that God had created the laws of physics. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Does anyone believe that there might be a God here ? I believe it's possible there is something/someone out there that we don't know. We don't actually know how the universe came to be. Sometimes, when i look at what scientists are able to do and how we're progressing i do think we are made in Gods image, but i don't fully know what God is. We are trying to be Gods, creators and controllers of chaos, all the time (some of us are anyway). I agree. I've never wrote anything off,even though I have no experience of it.Sometimes I do sit and wonder ?" I'm ignostic. I believe in the possibility of a God but i need it explaining to me first coz i can't fathom what a God might be. I just sit and think about how insane it is that anything even exists, and that we're aware of it. Or able to have an imagination and the understanding of physics to work out how it might have all come about. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Does anyone believe that there might be a God here ? God was created by men who wanted an excuse to commit murder, gain enormous wealth and subjugate those with weaker wills. Every race through known human history has at some point had a 'God' or two. Does your simple statement cover all of these instances? " Pretty much any race that has a hierarchy, which is most, if not all. So yes, my "simple" statement covers many of those instances. The great thing is it's just an opinion but one that can't be proved wrong. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Science does not know how life actually started. Creationists are simply guessing. The evidence for evolution is accepted by some creationists because they see it as being compatible with their beliefs. Some eminent scientists believe the idea of a creator is not inconsistent with their view of science. True, I'm sure prof stephen hawking even said that the more he learnt about the universe the more he thought someone had designed it. I'm paraphrasing of course. Up until 5 or 6 years ago Hawkins believed that God had created the laws of physics. " What happened 5 or 6 years ago?! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Does anyone believe that there might be a God here ? I believe it's possible there is something/someone out there that we don't know. We don't actually know how the universe came to be. Sometimes, when i look at what scientists are able to do and how we're progressing i do think we are made in Gods image, but i don't fully know what God is. We are trying to be Gods, creators and controllers of chaos, all the time (some of us are anyway). I agree. I've never wrote anything off,even though I have no experience of it.Sometimes I do sit and wonder ? I'm ignostic. I believe in the possibility of a God but i need it explaining to me first coz i can't fathom what a God might be. I just sit and think about how insane it is that anything even exists, and that we're aware of it. Or able to have an imagination and the understanding of physics to work out how it might have all come about. " I often wonder why we're really here ? Like what's our real purpose ? I mean is this really it ? Is there something else? Or is it just a comfort blanket for some in life who need to cling to something ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Does anyone believe that there might be a God here ?" I believe in God. I don't believe he or she is on Fab though. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Does anyone believe that there might be a God here ? I believe it's possible there is something/someone out there that we don't know. We don't actually know how the universe came to be. Sometimes, when i look at what scientists are able to do and how we're progressing i do think we are made in Gods image, but i don't fully know what God is. We are trying to be Gods, creators and controllers of chaos, all the time (some of us are anyway). I agree. I've never wrote anything off,even though I have no experience of it.Sometimes I do sit and wonder ? I'm ignostic. I believe in the possibility of a God but i need it explaining to me first coz i can't fathom what a God might be. I just sit and think about how insane it is that anything even exists, and that we're aware of it. Or able to have an imagination and the understanding of physics to work out how it might have all come about. I often wonder why we're really here ? Like what's our real purpose ? I mean is this really it ? Is there something else? Or is it just a comfort blanket for some in life who need to cling to something ?" We are here to learn and continue the species. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Does anyone believe that there might be a God here ? I believe it's possible there is something/someone out there that we don't know. We don't actually know how the universe came to be. Sometimes, when i look at what scientists are able to do and how we're progressing i do think we are made in Gods image, but i don't fully know what God is. We are trying to be Gods, creators and controllers of chaos, all the time (some of us are anyway). I agree. I've never wrote anything off,even though I have no experience of it.Sometimes I do sit and wonder ? I'm ignostic. I believe in the possibility of a God but i need it explaining to me first coz i can't fathom what a God might be. I just sit and think about how insane it is that anything even exists, and that we're aware of it. Or able to have an imagination and the understanding of physics to work out how it might have all come about. I often wonder why we're really here ? Like what's our real purpose ? I mean is this really it ? Is there something else? Or is it just a comfort blanket for some in life who need to cling to something ?" Dunno myself. I do know we need a physical body to experience emotions, our senses all add up to how we experience this world and this life and this sets off chemical reactions. Not sure how this relates to an afterlife though. Or a purpose. I think anything is what you make of it, if you think too much or too open mindedly you'll drive yourself mad, so just gotta accept what you think is true as true and keep looking for answers sometimes. Sometimes there are no answers, if there are you'll find them when the time is right and you've got the experience to have the ability to understand. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Science does not know how life actually started. Creationists are simply guessing. The evidence for evolution is accepted by some creationists because they see it as being compatible with their beliefs. Some eminent scientists believe the idea of a creator is not inconsistent with their view of science. True, I'm sure prof stephen hawking even said that the more he learnt about the universe the more he thought someone had designed it. I'm paraphrasing of course. Up until 5 or 6 years ago Hawkins believed that God had created the laws of physics. What happened 5 or 6 years ago?!" He simply changed his mind in the light of new scientific theory. I guess he inadvertently reinforced the theory of 'the god of the gaps'. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The only thing I believe is that we do not know. I do not agree with fundamentalists from either the scientist or creationist arena. Anyone who tells you they know definitively is probably best avoided. In my humble opinion the less definitive and more open I am, the wiser I have become. Maybe both science and creationism are belief systems that will one day be replaced by a convincing whole new movement. " Science doesn't peddle absolutes though, merely posits theories based on available evidence. And new evidence is always sought. There can come a point where the available evidence is so good that theory can be seen as close to rock solid and that's how I view the theory of evolution. We'll certainly see it updated, possibly contradicted but it seems to illustrate how humans have demonstrably altered over time. I am reasonably certain that we've been around for significantly longer than 6,000 years here and earlier forms evolved to become us. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Creationist here." How was the apple? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Since "evolution" is just a theory I'll always believe in a "creator" because logic tells me so " Logic? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Nice to see a couple of brave souls here who refuse to follow the herd" Why is it "following the herd" to believe a certain thing? I believe in evolution regardless of what other people believe. Some could say that believing either is following one herd or another. I haven't read anyone on here that has come up with a whole new theory. Most people in the UK believe in evolution. So most who post here will too. Describing it as herd mentality is inaccurate. -Courtney | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The only thing I believe is that we do not know. I do not agree with fundamentalists from either the scientist or creationist arena. Anyone who tells you they know definitively is probably best avoided. In my humble opinion the less definitive and more open I am, the wiser I have become. Maybe both science and creationism are belief systems that will one day be replaced by a convincing whole new movement. Science doesn't peddle absolutes though, merely posits theories based on available evidence. And new evidence is always sought. There can come a point where the available evidence is so good that theory can be seen as close to rock solid and that's how I view the theory of evolution. We'll certainly see it updated, possibly contradicted but it seems to illustrate how humans have demonstrably altered over time. I am reasonably certain that we've been around for significantly longer than 6,000 years here and earlier forms evolved to become us. " Most of science seems to 'peddle' as an absolute that creationism is unfounded. It is my opinion that both early creationists as well as early scientists have got it wrong. A 6 day creation 6000 years ago or early theories of gravity. Science is a belief system in my opinion, and I'm certainly not trying to defend creationists! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The only thing I believe is that we do not know. I do not agree with fundamentalists from either the scientist or creationist arena. Anyone who tells you they know definitively is probably best avoided. In my humble opinion the less definitive and more open I am, the wiser I have become. Maybe both science and creationism are belief systems that will one day be replaced by a convincing whole new movement. " . That's a complete cop out and you know it, there's a massive amount of evidence for evolution and... Fuck all for creationism I belive there's little men in my mobile phone that transmit date through bongo drums when I'm making a call... Of course that's fucking bollocks, it sounds bollocks, and quite frankly I'm making it all up.... Ring a bell.. Oh yes religion... It's bollocks, humans made it all up because we're afraid of death... Get over it! Of course I could say, I belive the open minded I am about little men in my mobile phone the more intelligent I become... Fuck off, no I'm cunt believing in shit for me reason or rhyme other than it suits my outlook! Religious people are the biggest fucking hypocrites ever... They sit and fucking preach all day about how good the afterlife is but as soon as one of their relatives die... There wailing and sobing like... I dunno they've died and there'll never see them again! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The only thing I believe is that we do not know. I do not agree with fundamentalists from either the scientist or creationist arena. Anyone who tells you they know definitively is probably best avoided. In my humble opinion the less definitive and more open I am, the wiser I have become. Maybe both science and creationism are belief systems that will one day be replaced by a convincing whole new movement. . That's a complete cop out and you know it, there's a massive amount of evidence for evolution and... Fuck all for creationism I belive there's little men in my mobile phone that transmit date through bongo drums when I'm making a call... Of course that's fucking bollocks, it sounds bollocks, and quite frankly I'm making it all up.... Ring a bell.. Oh yes religion... It's bollocks, humans made it all up because we're afraid of death... Get over it! Of course I could say, I belive the open minded I am about little men in my mobile phone the more intelligent I become... Fuck off, no I'm cunt believing in shit for me reason or rhyme other than it suits my outlook! Religious people are the biggest fucking hypocrites ever... They sit and fucking preach all day about how good the afterlife is but as soon as one of their relatives die... There wailing and sobing like... I dunno they've died and there'll never see them again! " Go on, sit on the fence a little longer (You typed what I was thinking & dared not to type lol ) | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Most people believing in something does not make it right; just means its a popular belief and that some of those people become part of a herd mentality They don't think things through; they just follow where the majority lead them or do it to appease or ingratiate They denigrate an opposing view, as has happened in a few of the comments " As I said above, I think you're wrong to call it a herd mentality. The people I know believe in evolution because of evidence, not because other people believe it. Of course denigrating other viewpoints is wrong, in most circumstances, but that has nothing to do with following the herd. -Courtney | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Evolutionist. I once had a creationist physics teacher, which seemed an odd combination." Not really, there is a creationist called Dr Grady McMurtry, who used to be an evolutionist and taught evolution, but then switched over to creationism, as he claims the more he learned about evolution, the more it didn't make sense and many things just don't add up. There are some interesting videos of Grady McMurtry on youtube, he has a Bachelor of science in forest management and general sciences from the university of Tennessee, and Master of science in Environmental studies from state university of New York. This guy is a scientist but believes in creationism. So far Richard Dawkins the evolutionists champion has refused to debate Dr Grady, so what is he afraid of? I'd love to see them debate each other as some of Dawkins debates with other creationists are quite entertaining, lol. I'm not a creationist, and i'm not an evolutionist either, truth is i don't know where we came from or how old the world is but i have an open mind to all kinds of possibilites as to where we came from. Its not just an issue of evolution or creation either, other theories exist such as is the human race the product of an alien experiment (watch the documentary series called ancient aliens), or is the world we live in a computer programme something along the lines of the matrix as the universe we live in does seem to be restricted to certain mathematical equations. Science can't explain everything and there are all kinds of possibilities out there...... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We were seeded by aliens from a far off world. " . Yeah, there's more likely hood Oooer a creator with green hands and six fingers... In fact actually there more likely to be based on... Oh I don't know carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, the four most abundant elements in the universe... Which is pretty much what humans are as well!.... Oh look... Were just like the universe... There must be a creator... Hallelujah praise the lord | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The only thing I believe is that we do not know. I do not agree with fundamentalists from either the scientist or creationist arena. Anyone who tells you they know definitively is probably best avoided. In my humble opinion the less definitive and more open I am, the wiser I have become. Maybe both science and creationism are belief systems that will one day be replaced by a convincing whole new movement. . That's a complete cop out and you know it, there's a massive amount of evidence for evolution and... Fuck all for creationism I belive there's little men in my mobile phone that transmit date through bongo drums when I'm making a call... Of course that's fucking bollocks, it sounds bollocks, and quite frankly I'm making it all up.... Ring a bell.. Oh yes religion... It's bollocks, humans made it all up because we're afraid of death... Get over it! Of course I could say, I belive the open minded I am about little men in my mobile phone the more intelligent I become... Fuck off, no I'm cunt believing in shit for me reason or rhyme other than it suits my outlook! Religious people are the biggest fucking hypocrites ever... They sit and fucking preach all day about how good the afterlife is but as soon as one of their relatives die... There wailing and sobing like... I dunno they've died and there'll never see them again! " If you look at how your mobile actually works...how you can press keys and that creates something, then you can send that something through the 'air', i mean how did anyone even figure out you could do something like that in the first place? Same for computer languages, how did anyone even work out to do this stuff? Even human speech is pretty incredible that we made that up and have the organs that enable this. As for death, it's not hypocritical. People have a gap in their immediate life that nothing but the person they miss can fill, until they get used to filling it with someone else. That's pretty amazing in itself when you think about it, and we have theories (that make sense) as to why we form attachments but nobody knows for sure. We even know how those attachments are formed but not why. None of these things are evidence for anything i can see, or not see, they just are. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The only thing I believe is that we do not know. I do not agree with fundamentalists from either the scientist or creationist arena. Anyone who tells you they know definitively is probably best avoided. In my humble opinion the less definitive and more open I am, the wiser I have become. Maybe both science and creationism are belief systems that will one day be replaced by a convincing whole new movement. . That's a complete cop out and you know it, there's a massive amount of evidence for evolution and... Fuck all for creationism I belive there's little men in my mobile phone that transmit date through bongo drums when I'm making a call... Of course that's fucking bollocks, it sounds bollocks, and quite frankly I'm making it all up.... Ring a bell.. Oh yes religion... It's bollocks, humans made it all up because we're afraid of death... Get over it! Of course I could say, I belive the open minded I am about little men in my mobile phone the more intelligent I become... Fuck off, no I'm cunt believing in shit for me reason or rhyme other than it suits my outlook! Religious people are the biggest fucking hypocrites ever... They sit and fucking preach all day about how good the afterlife is but as soon as one of their relatives die... There wailing and sobing like... I dunno they've died and there'll never see them again! " Your response made me think of the philosopher Alan watts - the real you.... Either way, I don't think the two are completely exclusive... There is a grey area, let's call it the dark matter we don't understand yet... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It is impossible to argue a point of view in the face of such hostility and almost abusive comments. One starts and the others follow Whilst in most other matters this kind of language will not be considered appropriate, it is when targeted towards any religious belief. Quite sad, really" | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It is impossible to argue a point of view in the face of such hostility and almost abusive comments. One starts and the others follow Whilst in most other matters this kind of language will not be considered appropriate, it is when targeted towards any religious belief. Quite sad, really " This is completely not true. I could point to any number of threads on foreigners, politics, immigration, etc. that get the same hostility. If I believe something, I argue for it, regardless of the language used against me. I only give up when my arguments can't stand up any longer. But I would always argue the issue, not that I don't like the attitude of the opposing side. -Courtney | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The only thing I believe is that we do not know. I do not agree with fundamentalists from either the scientist or creationist arena. Anyone who tells you they know definitively is probably best avoided. In my humble opinion the less definitive and more open I am, the wiser I have become. Maybe both science and creationism are belief systems that will one day be replaced by a convincing whole new movement. . That's a complete cop out and you know it, there's a massive amount of evidence for evolution and... Fuck all for creationism I belive there's little men in my mobile phone that transmit date through bongo drums when I'm making a call... Of course that's fucking bollocks, it sounds bollocks, and quite frankly I'm making it all up.... Ring a bell.. Oh yes religion... It's bollocks, humans made it all up because we're afraid of death... Get over it! Of course I could say, I belive the open minded I am about little men in my mobile phone the more intelligent I become... Fuck off, no I'm cunt believing in shit for me reason or rhyme other than it suits my outlook! Religious people are the biggest fucking hypocrites ever... They sit and fucking preach all day about how good the afterlife is but as soon as one of their relatives die... There wailing and sobing like... I dunno they've died and there'll never see them again! " No it's not a cop out, it's an honest answer as to where I am with this topic and I have taken the time to study the argument of some very well educated creationists who have zero belief in the 6 day 6000 year argument and have fully acceptanced the evolution argument. I've moved from being athiest to having a more agnostic position so you certainly won't find me defending religion. Oh and please don't tell me what I know, you have very little idea of that. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The only thing I believe is that we do not know. I do not agree with fundamentalists from either the scientist or creationist arena. Anyone who tells you they know definitively is probably best avoided. In my humble opinion the less definitive and more open I am, the wiser I have become. Maybe both science and creationism are belief systems that will one day be replaced by a convincing whole new movement. . That's a complete cop out and you know it, there's a massive amount of evidence for evolution and... Fuck all for creationism I belive there's little men in my mobile phone that transmit date through bongo drums when I'm making a call... Of course that's fucking bollocks, it sounds bollocks, and quite frankly I'm making it all up.... Ring a bell.. Oh yes religion... It's bollocks, humans made it all up because we're afraid of death... Get over it! Of course I could say, I belive the open minded I am about little men in my mobile phone the more intelligent I become... Fuck off, no I'm cunt believing in shit for me reason or rhyme other than it suits my outlook! Religious people are the biggest fucking hypocrites ever... They sit and fucking preach all day about how good the afterlife is but as soon as one of their relatives die... There wailing and sobing like... I dunno they've died and there'll never see them again! If you look at how your mobile actually works...how you can press keys and that creates something, then you can send that something through the 'air', i mean how did anyone even figure out you could do something like that in the first place? Same for computer languages, how did anyone even work out to do this stuff? Even human speech is pretty incredible that we made that up and have the organs that enable this. As for death, it's not hypocritical. People have a gap in their immediate life that nothing but the person they miss can fill, until they get used to filling it with someone else. That's pretty amazing in itself when you think about it, and we have theories (that make sense) as to why we form attachments but nobody knows for sure. We even know how those attachments are formed but not why. None of these things are evidence for anything i can see, or not see, they just are." . I know how mobile phones work! I was being pedantic! Of course I could argue that science is wrong, that all the facts aren't in yet about how mobile communication works... But quite frankly people who wanna belive bollocks... Will never be persuaded of anything else, people who are sane go of what we know... When we discover heaven and that big bearded bloke I'll change my rationale, until then it's bollocks with no proof whatsoever like my bongo drums in my mobile or Scientology or Mormonism, or Judaism or Islam.... The truly open minded people see that, that's why were open minded, because we belive in stuff we have proof for and change our beliefs to suite... Hell the evidence, you know like the earth going round the sun or the earth being round or the earth being 4 billion years old or.... Humans evolving | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Evolutionist. I once had a creationist physics teacher, which seemed an odd combination. Not really, there is a creationist called Dr Grady McMurtry, who used to be an evolutionist and taught evolution, but then switched over to creationism, as he claims the more he learned about evolution, the more it didn't make sense and many things just don't add up. There are some interesting videos of Grady McMurtry on youtube, he has a Bachelor of science in forest management and general sciences from the university of Tennessee, and Master of science in Environmental studies from state university of New York. This guy is a scientist but believes in creationism. So far Richard Dawkins the evolutionists champion has refused to debate Dr Grady, so what is he afraid of? I'd love to see them debate each other as some of Dawkins debates with other creationists are quite entertaining, lol. I'm not a creationist, and i'm not an evolutionist either, truth is i don't know where we came from or how old the world is but i have an open mind to all kinds of possibilites as to where we came from. Its not just an issue of evolution or creation either, other theories exist such as is the human race the product of an alien experiment (watch the documentary series called ancient aliens), or is the world we live in a computer programme something along the lines of the matrix as the universe we live in does seem to be restricted to certain mathematical equations. Science can't explain everything and there are all kinds of possibilities out there......" | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The only thing I believe is that we do not know. I do not agree with fundamentalists from either the scientist or creationist arena. Anyone who tells you they know definitively is probably best avoided. In my humble opinion the less definitive and more open I am, the wiser I have become. Maybe both science and creationism are belief systems that will one day be replaced by a convincing whole new movement. . That's a complete cop out and you know it, there's a massive amount of evidence for evolution and... Fuck all for creationism I belive there's little men in my mobile phone that transmit date through bongo drums when I'm making a call... Of course that's fucking bollocks, it sounds bollocks, and quite frankly I'm making it all up.... Ring a bell.. Oh yes religion... It's bollocks, humans made it all up because we're afraid of death... Get over it! Of course I could say, I belive the open minded I am about little men in my mobile phone the more intelligent I become... Fuck off, no I'm cunt believing in shit for me reason or rhyme other than it suits my outlook! Religious people are the biggest fucking hypocrites ever... They sit and fucking preach all day about how good the afterlife is but as soon as one of their relatives die... There wailing and sobing like... I dunno they've died and there'll never see them again! No it's not a cop out, it's an honest answer as to where I am with this topic and I have taken the time to study the argument of some very well educated creationists who have zero belief in the 6 day 6000 year argument and have fully acceptanced the evolution argument. I've moved from being athiest to having a more agnostic position so you certainly won't find me defending religion. Oh and please don't tell me what I know, you have very little idea of that. " . An honest idea of where your personal beliefs lie, is not what the evidence suggests... If you'd said, the overwhelming evidence is for evolution but I've got a funny feeling in my Willy that there's something else that I've got no evidence for entirely but I happen to belive it.... Then I'd have said, that's OK, your entitled to your beliefs like other people are entitled to belive that they exploded the twin towers with thermite, or that the queens a reptilian who controls the world with mind control! All of which could be true, yes they absolutely could be true, just like creationism or God... There's just not much evidence so it slips down there to the 0.00000000000000001 chance | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The only thing I believe is that we do not know. I do not agree with fundamentalists from either the scientist or creationist arena. Anyone who tells you they know definitively is probably best avoided. In my humble opinion the less definitive and more open I am, the wiser I have become. Maybe both science and creationism are belief systems that will one day be replaced by a convincing whole new movement. . That's a complete cop out and you know it, there's a massive amount of evidence for evolution and... Fuck all for creationism I belive there's little men in my mobile phone that transmit date through bongo drums when I'm making a call... Of course that's fucking bollocks, it sounds bollocks, and quite frankly I'm making it all up.... Ring a bell.. Oh yes religion... It's bollocks, humans made it all up because we're afraid of death... Get over it! Of course I could say, I belive the open minded I am about little men in my mobile phone the more intelligent I become... Fuck off, no I'm cunt believing in shit for me reason or rhyme other than it suits my outlook! Religious people are the biggest fucking hypocrites ever... They sit and fucking preach all day about how good the afterlife is but as soon as one of their relatives die... There wailing and sobing like... I dunno they've died and there'll never see them again! If you look at how your mobile actually works...how you can press keys and that creates something, then you can send that something through the 'air', i mean how did anyone even figure out you could do something like that in the first place? Same for computer languages, how did anyone even work out to do this stuff? Even human speech is pretty incredible that we made that up and have the organs that enable this. As for death, it's not hypocritical. People have a gap in their immediate life that nothing but the person they miss can fill, until they get used to filling it with someone else. That's pretty amazing in itself when you think about it, and we have theories (that make sense) as to why we form attachments but nobody knows for sure. We even know how those attachments are formed but not why. None of these things are evidence for anything i can see, or not see, they just are.. I know how mobile phones work! I was being pedantic! Of course I could argue that science is wrong, that all the facts aren't in yet about how mobile communication works... But quite frankly people who wanna belive bollocks... Will never be persuaded of anything else, people who are sane go of what we know... When we discover heaven and that big bearded bloke I'll change my rationale, until then it's bollocks with no proof whatsoever like my bongo drums in my mobile or Scientology or Mormonism, or Judaism or Islam.... The truly open minded people see that, that's why were open minded, because we belive in stuff we have proof for and change our beliefs to suite... Hell the evidence, you know like the earth going round the sun or the earth being round or the earth being 4 billion years old or.... Humans evolving " You believe your post shows you have an open mind. I don't. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Weird question for a swinger site: are you a creationist or evolutionist? " Neither because I do not adhere to American beliefs | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The only thing I believe is that we do not know. I do not agree with fundamentalists from either the scientist or creationist arena. Anyone who tells you they know definitively is probably best avoided. In my humble opinion the less definitive and more open I am, the wiser I have become. Maybe both science and creationism are belief systems that will one day be replaced by a convincing whole new movement. . That's a complete cop out and you know it, there's a massive amount of evidence for evolution and... Fuck all for creationism I belive there's little men in my mobile phone that transmit date through bongo drums when I'm making a call... Of course that's fucking bollocks, it sounds bollocks, and quite frankly I'm making it all up.... Ring a bell.. Oh yes religion... It's bollocks, humans made it all up because we're afraid of death... Get over it! Of course I could say, I belive the open minded I am about little men in my mobile phone the more intelligent I become... Fuck off, no I'm cunt believing in shit for me reason or rhyme other than it suits my outlook! Religious people are the biggest fucking hypocrites ever... They sit and fucking preach all day about how good the afterlife is but as soon as one of their relatives die... There wailing and sobing like... I dunno they've died and there'll never see them again! If you look at how your mobile actually works...how you can press keys and that creates something, then you can send that something through the 'air', i mean how did anyone even figure out you could do something like that in the first place? Same for computer languages, how did anyone even work out to do this stuff? Even human speech is pretty incredible that we made that up and have the organs that enable this. As for death, it's not hypocritical. People have a gap in their immediate life that nothing but the person they miss can fill, until they get used to filling it with someone else. That's pretty amazing in itself when you think about it, and we have theories (that make sense) as to why we form attachments but nobody knows for sure. We even know how those attachments are formed but not why. None of these things are evidence for anything i can see, or not see, they just are.. I know how mobile phones work! I was being pedantic! Of course I could argue that science is wrong, that all the facts aren't in yet about how mobile communication works... But quite frankly people who wanna belive bollocks... Will never be persuaded of anything else, people who are sane go of what we know... When we discover heaven and that big bearded bloke I'll change my rationale, until then it's bollocks with no proof whatsoever like my bongo drums in my mobile or Scientology or Mormonism, or Judaism or Islam.... The truly open minded people see that, that's why were open minded, because we belive in stuff we have proof for and change our beliefs to suite... Hell the evidence, you know like the earth going round the sun or the earth being round or the earth being 4 billion years old or.... Humans evolving " Yeah but we have our phones and programming languages and it doesn't make sense that we even have them. Same for germs, someone had an idea what germs were without anyone being able to physically seeing them everyone called him insane for believing that until one day a microscope was able to see them and observe them. I tend to think religion is abused by many people, i definitely don't follow one (or need/want to), but if other people believe in that then we just don't understand why or how they think. They've rationalised religion in their head and it's only when they're dangerous because of it is when we need to step in a say they're wrong. So what if they think the earth is 6000 years old? How's that causing any harm to actual archeologists or anyone like that? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The only thing I believe is that we do not know. I do not agree with fundamentalists from either the scientist or creationist arena. Anyone who tells you they know definitively is probably best avoided. In my humble opinion the less definitive and more open I am, the wiser I have become. Maybe both science and creationism are belief systems that will one day be replaced by a convincing whole new movement. . That's a complete cop out and you know it, there's a massive amount of evidence for evolution and... Fuck all for creationism I belive there's little men in my mobile phone that transmit date through bongo drums when I'm making a call... Of course that's fucking bollocks, it sounds bollocks, and quite frankly I'm making it all up.... Ring a bell.. Oh yes religion... It's bollocks, humans made it all up because we're afraid of death... Get over it! Of course I could say, I belive the open minded I am about little men in my mobile phone the more intelligent I become... Fuck off, no I'm cunt believing in shit for me reason or rhyme other than it suits my outlook! Religious people are the biggest fucking hypocrites ever... They sit and fucking preach all day about how good the afterlife is but as soon as one of their relatives die... There wailing and sobing like... I dunno they've died and there'll never see them again! No it's not a cop out, it's an honest answer as to where I am with this topic and I have taken the time to study the argument of some very well educated creationists who have zero belief in the 6 day 6000 year argument and have fully acceptanced the evolution argument. I've moved from being athiest to having a more agnostic position so you certainly won't find me defending religion. Oh and please don't tell me what I know, you have very little idea of that. . An honest idea of where your personal beliefs lie, is not what the evidence suggests... If you'd said, the overwhelming evidence is for evolution but I've got a funny feeling in my Willy that there's something else that I've got no evidence for entirely but I happen to belive it.... Then I'd have said, that's OK, your entitled to your beliefs like other people are entitled to belive that they exploded the twin towers with thermite, or that the queens a reptilian who controls the world with mind control! All of which could be true, yes they absolutely could be true, just like creationism or God... There's just not much evidence so it slips down there to the 0.00000000000000001 chance" So as an evolutionist how do you explain that when you make copies of "things" (reproduction of species) the DNA material is copied into the offspring and so on and so on generation after generation. Where does the new genetic material or DNA come from for that species to evolve into something else? You can't say it is down to mutations because it is scientific fact that mutations in species lose genetic material or DNA, (they become less perfect copies) they have less genetic material than the generation before them. The whole concept of evolution is that it improves a species over time, mutations are weaker copies of what went before them. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The only thing I believe is that we do not know. I do not agree with fundamentalists from either the scientist or creationist arena. Anyone who tells you they know definitively is probably best avoided. In my humble opinion the less definitive and more open I am, the wiser I have become. Maybe both science and creationism are belief systems that will one day be replaced by a convincing whole new movement. . That's a complete cop out and you know it, there's a massive amount of evidence for evolution and... Fuck all for creationism I belive there's little men in my mobile phone that transmit date through bongo drums when I'm making a call... Of course that's fucking bollocks, it sounds bollocks, and quite frankly I'm making it all up.... Ring a bell.. Oh yes religion... It's bollocks, humans made it all up because we're afraid of death... Get over it! Of course I could say, I belive the open minded I am about little men in my mobile phone the more intelligent I become... Fuck off, no I'm cunt believing in shit for me reason or rhyme other than it suits my outlook! Religious people are the biggest fucking hypocrites ever... They sit and fucking preach all day about how good the afterlife is but as soon as one of their relatives die... There wailing and sobing like... I dunno they've died and there'll never see them again! No it's not a cop out, it's an honest answer as to where I am with this topic and I have taken the time to study the argument of some very well educated creationists who have zero belief in the 6 day 6000 year argument and have fully acceptanced the evolution argument. I've moved from being athiest to having a more agnostic position so you certainly won't find me defending religion. Oh and please don't tell me what I know, you have very little idea of that. . An honest idea of where your personal beliefs lie, is not what the evidence suggests... If you'd said, the overwhelming evidence is for evolution but I've got a funny feeling in my Willy that there's something else that I've got no evidence for entirely but I happen to belive it.... Then I'd have said, that's OK, your entitled to your beliefs like other people are entitled to belive that they exploded the twin towers with thermite, or that the queens a reptilian who controls the world with mind control! All of which could be true, yes they absolutely could be true, just like creationism or God... There's just not much evidence so it slips down there to the 0.00000000000000001 chance" Go back and actually read what I have said if you have any interest of actually understanding my position. You seem to be attempting to force your opinion onto others. Something in common with the negative aspect of religion. I've studied Darwin and read a number of Dawkins early works, I certainly don't need lessons in the evidence of evolution from you. You seem to be suggesting that one has to choose between the two, I no longer share that view. It doesn't make me a creationist it's simply allowed me to be more open to ideas and debate without the need to try and convert anyone. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The only thing I believe is that we do not know. I do not agree with fundamentalists from either the scientist or creationist arena. Anyone who tells you they know definitively is probably best avoided. In my humble opinion the less definitive and more open I am, the wiser I have become. Maybe both science and creationism are belief systems that will one day be replaced by a convincing whole new movement. . That's a complete cop out and you know it, there's a massive amount of evidence for evolution and... Fuck all for creationism I belive there's little men in my mobile phone that transmit date through bongo drums when I'm making a call... Of course that's fucking bollocks, it sounds bollocks, and quite frankly I'm making it all up.... Ring a bell.. Oh yes religion... It's bollocks, humans made it all up because we're afraid of death... Get over it! Of course I could say, I belive the open minded I am about little men in my mobile phone the more intelligent I become... Fuck off, no I'm cunt believing in shit for me reason or rhyme other than it suits my outlook! Religious people are the biggest fucking hypocrites ever... They sit and fucking preach all day about how good the afterlife is but as soon as one of their relatives die... There wailing and sobing like... I dunno they've died and there'll never see them again! No it's not a cop out, it's an honest answer as to where I am with this topic and I have taken the time to study the argument of some very well educated creationists who have zero belief in the 6 day 6000 year argument and have fully acceptanced the evolution argument. I've moved from being athiest to having a more agnostic position so you certainly won't find me defending religion. Oh and please don't tell me what I know, you have very little idea of that. . An honest idea of where your personal beliefs lie, is not what the evidence suggests... If you'd said, the overwhelming evidence is for evolution but I've got a funny feeling in my Willy that there's something else that I've got no evidence for entirely but I happen to belive it.... Then I'd have said, that's OK, your entitled to your beliefs like other people are entitled to belive that they exploded the twin towers with thermite, or that the queens a reptilian who controls the world with mind control! All of which could be true, yes they absolutely could be true, just like creationism or God... There's just not much evidence so it slips down there to the 0.00000000000000001 chance So as an evolutionist how do you explain that when you make copies of "things" (reproduction of species) the DNA material is copied into the offspring and so on and so on generation after generation. Where does the new genetic material or DNA come from for that species to evolve into something else? You can't say it is down to mutations because it is scientific fact that mutations in species lose genetic material or DNA, (they become less perfect copies) they have less genetic material than the generation before them. The whole concept of evolution is that it improves a species over time, mutations are weaker copies of what went before them. " Mutations don't always improve the species, look at cancer for example or mutations on chromosome 21. They do just change the DNA. Environment can cause them, hormones and chemicals can cause them, even cell division can cause them. At one time all plants lived in water, now they're on land too. Google speciation, was gonna leave a link but confused about what links i can actually post on here. I find learning about plant genetics is easiest. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What is a mutation? A mutation is a permanent change in the sequence of DNA. In order for an observable effect, mutations must occur in gene exons or regulatory elements. Changes in the non-coding regions of DNA (introns and junk DNA) generally do not affect function. What causes mutations? Mutations can be caused by external (exogenous) or endogenous (native) factors, or they may be caused by errors in the cellular machinery. Physical or chemical agents that induce mutations in DNA are called mutagens and are said to be mutagenic. Exogenous factors: environmental factors such as sunlight, radiation, and smoking can cause mutations. Endogenous factors: errors during DNA replication can lead to genetic changes as can toxic by-products of cellular metabolism. What are the consequences of mutations? Mutations can be advantageous and lead to an evolutionary advantage of a certain genotype. Mutations can also be deleterious, causing disease, developmental delays, structural abnormalities, or other effects. Types of Mutations: There are several classes of mutations described below. The original sequence is shown on the top with the mutated sequence below it. The genetic sequence is shown in black while the protein sequence is in blue. Changes in sequence are highlighted by yellow. To see what these mutations look like when sequenced, click here. Deletion Genetic material is removed or deleted. A few bases can be deleted (as shown on the left) or it can be complete or partial loss of a chromosome (shown on right). Frameshift The insertion or deletion of a number of bases that is not a multiple of 3. This alters the reading frame of the gene and frequently results in a premature stop codon and protein truncation. Insertion When genetic material is put into another region of DNA. This may be the insertion of 1 or more bases, or it can be part of one chromosome being inserted into another, non-homologous chromosome. Missense A change in DNA sequence that changes the codon to a different amino acid. Not all missense mutations are deleterious, some changes can have no effect. Because of the ambiguity of missense mutations, it is often difficult to interpret the consequences of these mutations in causing disease. Nonsense A change in the genetic code that results in the coding for a stop codon rather than an amino acid. The shortened protein is generally non-function or its function is impeded. Point A single base change in DNA sequence. A point mutation may be silent, missense, or nonsense. Silent A change in the genetic sequence that does not change the protein sequence. This can occur because of redundancy in the genetic code where an amino acid may be encoded for by multiple codons. Splice Site A change in the genetic sequence that occurs at the boundary of the exons and introns. The consensus sequences at these boundaries signal where to cut out introns and rejoin exons in the mRNA. A change in these sequences can eliminate splicing at that site which would change the reading frame and protein sequence. Translocation A structural abnormality of chromosomes where genetic material is exchanged between two or more non-homologous chromosomes. Good site, i haven't plagarised it honest. Taken that from an edu site." In answer to that I would say go on YouTube and type in "Dr Grady McMurtry survival of the fittest part 1". Then after watch part 2 and 3, total 3 episodes is about half an hour I think? Would take me ages to type out a reply so just easier to watch the video instead. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The only thing I believe is that we do not know. I do not agree with fundamentalists from either the scientist or creationist arena. Anyone who tells you they know definitively is probably best avoided. In my humble opinion the less definitive and more open I am, the wiser I have become. Maybe both science and creationism are belief systems that will one day be replaced by a convincing whole new movement. . That's a complete cop out and you know it, there's a massive amount of evidence for evolution and... Fuck all for creationism I belive there's little men in my mobile phone that transmit date through bongo drums when I'm making a call... Of course that's fucking bollocks, it sounds bollocks, and quite frankly I'm making it all up.... Ring a bell.. Oh yes religion... It's bollocks, humans made it all up because we're afraid of death... Get over it! Of course I could say, I belive the open minded I am about little men in my mobile phone the more intelligent I become... Fuck off, no I'm cunt believing in shit for me reason or rhyme other than it suits my outlook! Religious people are the biggest fucking hypocrites ever... They sit and fucking preach all day about how good the afterlife is but as soon as one of their relatives die... There wailing and sobing like... I dunno they've died and there'll never see them again! No it's not a cop out, it's an honest answer as to where I am with this topic and I have taken the time to study the argument of some very well educated creationists who have zero belief in the 6 day 6000 year argument and have fully acceptanced the evolution argument. I've moved from being athiest to having a more agnostic position so you certainly won't find me defending religion. Oh and please don't tell me what I know, you have very little idea of that. . An honest idea of where your personal beliefs lie, is not what the evidence suggests... If you'd said, the overwhelming evidence is for evolution but I've got a funny feeling in my Willy that there's something else that I've got no evidence for entirely but I happen to belive it.... Then I'd have said, that's OK, your entitled to your beliefs like other people are entitled to belive that they exploded the twin towers with thermite, or that the queens a reptilian who controls the world with mind control! All of which could be true, yes they absolutely could be true, just like creationism or God... There's just not much evidence so it slips down there to the 0.00000000000000001 chance So as an evolutionist how do you explain that when you make copies of "things" (reproduction of species) the DNA material is copied into the offspring and so on and so on generation after generation. Where does the new genetic material or DNA come from for that species to evolve into something else? You can't say it is down to mutations because it is scientific fact that mutations in species lose genetic material or DNA, (they become less perfect copies) they have less genetic material than the generation before them. The whole concept of evolution is that it improves a species over time, mutations are weaker copies of what went before them. Mutations don't always improve the species, look at cancer for example or mutations on chromosome 21. They do just change the DNA. Environment can cause them, hormones and chemicals can cause them, even cell division can cause them. At one time all plants lived in water, now they're on land too. Google speciation, was gonna leave a link but confused about what links i can actually post on here. I find learning about plant genetics is easiest." I still dont understand why some people think that evolution means improvement...it is just an organism adapting to its environment..the most successful of all species havent actually changed to anything other than what they are now and thats been for a very very long time, pre-dating us and the dinosaurs. i.e invertebrates(god help us all if they acted like a malevolent super organism!) there is no forward arrow predetermining evolution. We as humans probably will manufacture our own evolution, I dont see us needing to change that much given our environments.. so it will be genetic and cybernetic...which will open a whole new can of worms regarding the 'new' genetic material..its not new..its just recycled energy/matter..its how the universe works | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It is impossible to argue a point of view in the face of such hostility and almost abusive comments. One starts and the others follow Whilst in most other matters this kind of language will not be considered appropriate, it is when targeted towards any religious belief. Quite sad, really" Totally agree | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It is impossible to argue a point of view in the face of such hostility and almost abusive comments. One starts and the others follow Whilst in most other matters this kind of language will not be considered appropriate, it is when targeted towards any religious belief. Quite sad, really This is completely not true. I could point to any number of threads on foreigners, politics, immigration, etc. that get the same hostility. If I believe something, I argue for it, regardless of the language used against me. I only give up when my arguments can't stand up any longer. But I would always argue the issue, not that I don't like the attitude of the opposing side. -Courtney" I find it best to let them win this argument. What is the point of arguing with a closed mind? The discussion will simply morph into, "I am free on xxxxxx; introduce me to your God then" (yes, I have been asked that too). Or, aren't you breaking 'your' commandments? In the final analysis, what is really being suggested is that the creationists are stupid simpletons for believing in the word of the Bible. The operative word here is "belief". A number of the premises supporting the theory of evolution are based on beliefs too. Its just different sort of beliefs What on Earth has the ability to understand the properties of semiconductors got to do with whether one believes in God and therefore that he created the universe and my ancestors vs it all just happened out of nothingness? Most of my family and friends believe in evolution. You are correct; in the 21st century in the Western hemisphere, this this the predominant belief. I do not wish to fall out, certainly not with my family, on such a dicussion, which in the end, is simply just another belief as neither is based on any hard evidence The only hard evidence is that tomorrow the weekend starts and I can then go and have some fun, which serves no purpose whatsoever but to make me feel better | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'm not sure how anyone could stand by creationist as the truth - world created in 6 days for example. When evolution is a proven fact. It's like arguing a piece of black is white. We can see its black We can prove its black Yet some will still say it's white. That's my perception of it anyway. " Except you cannot see black, black is what occurrs when no light is returned. That therefore proves the flaw in your logic. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'm not sure how anyone could stand by creationist as the truth - world created in 6 days for example. When evolution is a proven fact. It's like arguing a piece of black is white. We can see its black We can prove its black Yet some will still say it's white. That's my perception of it anyway. Except you cannot see black, black is what occurrs when no light is returned. That therefore proves the flaw in your logic." What colour is my sofa then? Because it's supposed to be black and yet I can quite clearly see it. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Weird question for a swinger site: are you a creationist or evolutionist? " Evolutionist 100% | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Evolutionist. I'm not sure anyone would even be brave enough to admit to being a creationist in the UK." I believe in the creationist theory however once the world was created evolution took over. That does not mean that I believe every word of the book of Genesis or take it in a literal sense but rather that it is an account portrayed in a way that people of the time could understand. People world wide replay the creation daily they create a "world" or enviroment for a new pet (be it a bird, animal or fish etc. to live in. The new pet then adapts the "new world" to their needs. The two points of view walk hand in hand. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'm not sure how anyone could stand by creationist as the truth - world created in 6 days for example. When evolution is a proven fact. It's like arguing a piece of black is white. We can see its black We can prove its black Yet some will still say it's white. That's my perception of it anyway. Except you cannot see black, black is what occurrs when no light is returned. That therefore proves the flaw in your logic. What colour is my sofa then? Because it's supposed to be black and yet I can quite clearly see it. " No you think you can see the colour but in reality what you are seeing is a lack of reflected light. It is similar to the pupil in your eyes they seem black because no light is reflected from them. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'm not sure how anyone could stand by creationist as the truth - world created in 6 days for example. When evolution is a proven fact. It's like arguing a piece of black is white. We can see its black We can prove its black Yet some will still say it's white. That's my perception of it anyway. Except you cannot see black, black is what occurrs when no light is returned. That therefore proves the flaw in your logic. What colour is my sofa then? Because it's supposed to be black and yet I can quite clearly see it. No you think you can see the colour but in reality what you are seeing is a lack of reflected light. It is similar to the pupil in your eyes they seem black because no light is reflected from them." So let me get this straight... You can't see black because it doesn't reflect light yet I can see my black sofa because it's not reflecting light. Also why can I see the reflection from my lamp in the leather? I think your theory on pigmented objects may be somewhat lacking. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'm not sure how anyone could stand by creationist as the truth - world created in 6 days for example. When evolution is a proven fact. " Evolution is not a proven fact, it's a theory that best explains the observed evidence. It's important that we recognise this because facts are absolute and do not change whereas a theory changes and evolves as new evidence becomes available. Evolution is not a religion and, as such, should not be believed but simply accepted as the best theory that explains the current evidence. " It's like arguing a piece of black is white. We can see its black We can prove its black Yet some will still say it's white. That's my perception of it anyway. " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There's an example of a book written about creationism and through various editions, it was amended. It evolved. " Nobody ever wrote that book. It just appeared out of thin air and THEN evolved | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'm not sure how anyone could stand by creationist as the truth - world created in 6 days for example. When evolution is a proven fact. Evolution is not a proven fact, it's a theory that best explains the observed evidence. It's important that we recognise this because facts are absolute and do not change whereas a theory changes and evolves as new evidence becomes available. Evolution is not a religion and, as such, should not be believed but simply accepted as the best theory that explains the current evidence. " Evolution is not a religion but it is a faith based belief system. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Evolution. I tend not to believe *everything* that's written in the various religious texts / ideologies from around the world " You shouldn't believe everything you read in evolutionist texts either. Just watch "Dr Grady McMurtry, fallacy of carbon dating" video on YouTube. He argues and proves backing up his claims with published texts that carbon dating figures are often "just made up". As a scientist he doesn't just say it's false, he backs it up with hard evidence. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It is impossible to argue a point of view in the face of such hostility and almost abusive comments. One starts and the others follow Whilst in most other matters this kind of language will not be considered appropriate, it is when targeted towards any religious belief. Quite sad, really Totally agree " This I find to be true on here too. Especially where that religious belief is Christianity | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Weird question for a swinger site: are you a creationist or evolutionist? well evolution is wrong, where are all the dead mutant species that died off and as for creationism, we know the earth is over 6000 years old as the bbc has repeats that old... " Take a look at the beasties in the Burgess Shale from the Canadian rockies https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fossils_of_the_Burgess_Shale | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It is impossible to argue a point of view in the face of such hostility and almost abusive comments. One starts and the others follow Whilst in most other matters this kind of language will not be considered appropriate, it is when targeted towards any religious belief. Quite sad, really Totally agree This I find to be true on here too. Especially where that religious belief is Christianity " The hostility against those who have a faith is staggering on here. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It is impossible to argue a point of view in the face of such hostility and almost abusive comments. One starts and the others follow Whilst in most other matters this kind of language will not be considered appropriate, it is when targeted towards any religious belief. Quite sad, really Totally agree This I find to be true on here too. Especially where that religious belief is Christianity The hostility against those who have a faith is staggering on here." To be fair though each of the big the abrahamic faiths say everyone here should be brutally murdered then tortured for all time. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It is impossible to argue a point of view in the face of such hostility and almost abusive comments. One starts and the others follow Whilst in most other matters this kind of language will not be considered appropriate, it is when targeted towards any religious belief. Quite sad, really Totally agree This I find to be true on here too. Especially where that religious belief is Christianity The hostility against those who have a faith is staggering on here. To be fair though each of the big the abrahamic faiths say everyone here should be brutally murdered then tortured for all time." Here's a prime example, right on cue. As usual, you're deliberately conflating what the Old Testament says with which what actual practicing Christians mostly do, say and believe. Which does NOT involve brutal murder or torture. This is the equivalent of stating that all Brits are perpetrators of slavery because it used to be permitted under our law. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It is impossible to argue a point of view in the face of such hostility and almost abusive comments. One starts and the others follow Whilst in most other matters this kind of language will not be considered appropriate, it is when targeted towards any religious belief. Quite sad, really Totally agree This I find to be true on here too. Especially where that religious belief is Christianity The hostility against those who have a faith is staggering on here." Ruby and Miss I, I have to say that I personally disagree with you both. As I already said above, I don't think it is hostile to have an opposing opinion to religion, and to argue for that opinion on a public forum where a religious question was asked. If you truly believe in your argument, then argue against them. Ruby, you argue on other threads for things you do and believe in. Why not on a religious thread? I see why you would feel that people were being insensitive, but I don't see where anyone has been hateful. Engage in the debate. I come from a place where the opposite viewpoint is held. In the US, atheists are considered completely untrustworthy and disreputable. Religion is the word, and if you disagree you get all sorts of labels and assumptions aimed at you. I never sat back in a debate and said how unfair the other side was. I argued my reasoning. I was, in effect, in the same situation you are in now. I personally think I had it better because it is easier to defend scientific findings then it is to defend dinosaurs with saddles on their backs (see my post above about my experience with creationism), but still, if you believe, then defend it. -Courtney | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'm not sure how anyone could stand by creationist as the truth - world created in 6 days for example. When evolution is a proven fact. Evolution is not a proven fact, it's a theory that best explains the observed evidence. It's important that we recognise this because facts are absolute and do not change whereas a theory changes and evolves as new evidence becomes available. Evolution is not a religion and, as such, should not be believed but simply accepted as the best theory that explains the current evidence. " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It is impossible to argue a point of view in the face of such hostility and almost abusive comments. One starts and the others follow Whilst in most other matters this kind of language will not be considered appropriate, it is when targeted towards any religious belief. Quite sad, really Totally agree This I find to be true on here too. Especially where that religious belief is Christianity The hostility against those who have a faith is staggering on here. To be fair though each of the big the abrahamic faiths say everyone here should be brutally murdered then tortured for all time. Here's a prime example, right on cue. As usual, you're deliberately conflating what the Old Testament says with which what actual practicing Christians mostly do, say and believe. Which does NOT involve brutal murder or torture. This is the equivalent of stating that all Brits are perpetrators of slavery because it used to be permitted under our law. " You've never read the bible have you? Especially say revelations? You should. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It is impossible to argue a point of view in the face of such hostility and almost abusive comments. One starts and the others follow Whilst in most other matters this kind of language will not be considered appropriate, it is when targeted towards any religious belief. Quite sad, really Totally agree This I find to be true on here too. Especially where that religious belief is Christianity The hostility against those who have a faith is staggering on here. To be fair though each of the big the abrahamic faiths say everyone here should be brutally murdered then tortured for all time. Here's a prime example, right on cue. As usual, you're deliberately conflating what the Old Testament says with which what actual practicing Christians mostly do, say and believe. Which does NOT involve brutal murder or torture. This is the equivalent of stating that all Brits are perpetrators of slavery because it used to be permitted under our law. You've never read the bible have you? Especially say revelations? You should." Yes, I've read the Bible. How about you read and understand what my comment above actually says and means? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It is impossible to argue a point of view in the face of such hostility and almost abusive comments. One starts and the others follow Whilst in most other matters this kind of language will not be considered appropriate, it is when targeted towards any religious belief. Quite sad, really Totally agree This I find to be true on here too. Especially where that religious belief is Christianity The hostility against those who have a faith is staggering on here. To be fair though each of the big the abrahamic faiths say everyone here should be brutally murdered then tortured for all time. Here's a prime example, right on cue. As usual, you're deliberately conflating what the Old Testament says with which what actual practicing Christians mostly do, say and believe. Which does NOT involve brutal murder or torture. This is the equivalent of stating that all Brits are perpetrators of slavery because it used to be permitted under our law. You've never read the bible have you? Especially say revelations? You should. Yes, I've read the Bible. How about you read and understand what my comment above actually says and means? " Great so have I. So while you're suffering in the absence of God's presence for all eternity (for the nice option) or burning for all eternity (the kjv option). Would you describe either option as torture? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It is impossible to argue a point of view in the face of such hostility and almost abusive comments. One starts and the others follow Whilst in most other matters this kind of language will not be considered appropriate, it is when targeted towards any religious belief. Quite sad, really Totally agree This I find to be true on here too. Especially where that religious belief is Christianity The hostility against those who have a faith is staggering on here. To be fair though each of the big the abrahamic faiths say everyone here should be brutally murdered then tortured for all time. Here's a prime example, right on cue. As usual, you're deliberately conflating what the Old Testament says with which what actual practicing Christians mostly do, say and believe. Which does NOT involve brutal murder or torture. This is the equivalent of stating that all Brits are perpetrators of slavery because it used to be permitted under our law. You've never read the bible have you? Especially say revelations? You should. Yes, I've read the Bible. How about you read and understand what my comment above actually says and means? Great so have I. So while you're suffering in the absence of God's presence for all eternity (for the nice option) or burning for all eternity (the kjv option). Would you describe either option as torture? " My interpretation of Revelations is as an allegory. It's a metaphor for spiritual struggle. It's not supposed to be real. Why are you basing your view of Christian people solely on the more over dramatic books of the Bible? On a book written centuries ago which is wedded to its cultural and political context? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It is impossible to argue a point of view in the face of such hostility and almost abusive comments. One starts and the others follow Whilst in most other matters this kind of language will not be considered appropriate, it is when targeted towards any religious belief. Quite sad, really Totally agree This I find to be true on here too. Especially where that religious belief is Christianity The hostility against those who have a faith is staggering on here. To be fair though each of the big the abrahamic faiths say everyone here should be brutally murdered then tortured for all time. Here's a prime example, right on cue. As usual, you're deliberately conflating what the Old Testament says with which what actual practicing Christians mostly do, say and believe. Which does NOT involve brutal murder or torture. This is the equivalent of stating that all Brits are perpetrators of slavery because it used to be permitted under our law. You've never read the bible have you? Especially say revelations? You should. Yes, I've read the Bible. How about you read and understand what my comment above actually says and means? Great so have I. So while you're suffering in the absence of God's presence for all eternity (for the nice option) or burning for all eternity (the kjv option). Would you describe either option as torture? My interpretation of Revelations is as an allegory. It's a metaphor for spiritual struggle. It's not supposed to be real. Why are you basing your view of Christian people solely on the more over dramatic books of the Bible? On a book written centuries ago which is wedded to its cultural and political context? " No I Base my view of Christianity and the rules of the faith (I never mentioned Christians at all merely their religion) on the book that contains all the rules of that faith and the true word of God according to that faith. Cause otherwise I'm not judging the rules laid down by god but instead random stuff made up by random people. Funny how you issue is only with Christianity not Islam or jewdaism that I said the same thing about. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It is impossible to argue a point of view in the face of such hostility and almost abusive comments. One starts and the others follow Whilst in most other matters this kind of language will not be considered appropriate, it is when targeted towards any religious belief. Quite sad, really Totally agree This I find to be true on here too. Especially where that religious belief is Christianity The hostility against those who have a faith is staggering on here. To be fair though each of the big the abrahamic faiths say everyone here should be brutally murdered then tortured for all time. Here's a prime example, right on cue. As usual, you're deliberately conflating what the Old Testament says with which what actual practicing Christians mostly do, say and believe. Which does NOT involve brutal murder or torture. This is the equivalent of stating that all Brits are perpetrators of slavery because it used to be permitted under our law. You've never read the bible have you? Especially say revelations? You should. Yes, I've read the Bible. How about you read and understand what my comment above actually says and means? Great so have I. So while you're suffering in the absence of God's presence for all eternity (for the nice option) or burning for all eternity (the kjv option). Would you describe either option as torture? My interpretation of Revelations is as an allegory. It's a metaphor for spiritual struggle. It's not supposed to be real. Why are you basing your view of Christian people solely on the more over dramatic books of the Bible? On a book written centuries ago which is wedded to its cultural and political context? " Ruby, can I ask, do you similarly read the rest of the bible as an allegory? And if not, then how do you choose what is allegorical and what isn't? Is it convenience of argument? This would effectively solve the OP as anyone believing in the bible as an allegory, wouldn't need to rest on creationism. -Courtney | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" If you truly believe in your argument, then argue against them. Ruby, you argue on other threads for things you do and believe in. Why not on a religious thread? I see why you would feel that people were being insensitive, but I don't see where anyone has been hateful. Engage in the debate. I come from a place where the opposite viewpoint is held. In the US, atheists are considered completely untrustworthy and disreputable. Religion is the word, and if you disagree you get all sorts of labels and assumptions aimed at you. I never sat back in a debate and said how unfair the other side was. I argued my reasoning. I was, in effect, in the same situation you are in now. I personally think I had it better because it is easier to defend scientific findings then it is to defend dinosaurs with saddles on their backs (see my post above about my experience with creationism), but still, if you believe, then defend it. -Courtney" Courtney, who in this thread has defended the idea of dinosaurs with saddles on their backs? You're not debating what's in the thread. The Pope agrees with the Big Bang theory and evolution - fact. He just believes that it is not inconsistent with a creator. The debate should not be about what fundamentalists believe but should be about a much more matured view of the argument from both sides in my opinion. I stress I am not a creationist and do not consider myself to be religious, my background is definitely scientific but I agree that there is at times an unjustified hostility towards people of religious faith in these types of debates. The bottom line is that the majority of science believes that something can come from nothing. Modern creationists believe that something can only come from something else. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It is impossible to argue a point of view in the face of such hostility and almost abusive comments. One starts and the others follow Whilst in most other matters this kind of language will not be considered appropriate, it is when targeted towards any religious belief. Quite sad, really Totally agree This I find to be true on here too. Especially where that religious belief is Christianity The hostility against those who have a faith is staggering on here. To be fair though each of the big the abrahamic faiths say everyone here should be brutally murdered then tortured for all time. Here's a prime example, right on cue. As usual, you're deliberately conflating what the Old Testament says with which what actual practicing Christians mostly do, say and believe. Which does NOT involve brutal murder or torture. This is the equivalent of stating that all Brits are perpetrators of slavery because it used to be permitted under our law. You've never read the bible have you? Especially say revelations? You should. Yes, I've read the Bible. How about you read and understand what my comment above actually says and means? Great so have I. So while you're suffering in the absence of God's presence for all eternity (for the nice option) or burning for all eternity (the kjv option). Would you describe either option as torture? My interpretation of Revelations is as an allegory. It's a metaphor for spiritual struggle. It's not supposed to be real. Why are you basing your view of Christian people solely on the more over dramatic books of the Bible? On a book written centuries ago which is wedded to its cultural and political context? No I Base my view of Christianity and the rules of the faith (I never mentioned Christians at all merely their religion) on the book that contains all the rules of that faith and the true word of God according to that faith. Cause otherwise I'm not judging the rules laid down by god but instead random stuff made up by random people. Funny how you issue is only with Christianity not Islam or jewdaism that I said the same thing about. " I picked Christianity because I am one. I don't in all honesty know enough about Islam or Judaism. I'd imagine that most followers of both faiths are in a similar position though. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It is impossible to argue a point of view in the face of such hostility and almost abusive comments. One starts and the others follow Whilst in most other matters this kind of language will not be considered appropriate, it is when targeted towards any religious belief. Quite sad, really Totally agree This I find to be true on here too. Especially where that religious belief is Christianity The hostility against those who have a faith is staggering on here. To be fair though each of the big the abrahamic faiths say everyone here should be brutally murdered then tortured for all time. Here's a prime example, right on cue. As usual, you're deliberately conflating what the Old Testament says with which what actual practicing Christians mostly do, say and believe. Which does NOT involve brutal murder or torture. This is the equivalent of stating that all Brits are perpetrators of slavery because it used to be permitted under our law. You've never read the bible have you? Especially say revelations? You should. Yes, I've read the Bible. How about you read and understand what my comment above actually says and means? Great so have I. So while you're suffering in the absence of God's presence for all eternity (for the nice option) or burning for all eternity (the kjv option). Would you describe either option as torture? My interpretation of Revelations is as an allegory. It's a metaphor for spiritual struggle. It's not supposed to be real. Why are you basing your view of Christian people solely on the more over dramatic books of the Bible? On a book written centuries ago which is wedded to its cultural and political context? Ruby, can I ask, do you similarly read the rest of the bible as an allegory? And if not, then how do you choose what is allegorical and what isn't? Is it convenience of argument? This would effectively solve the OP as anyone believing in the bible as an allegory, wouldn't need to rest on creationism. -Courtney" I don't think there is any incompatibility between being a Christian and believing in evolution. I believe in the bible as a book of allegories, as the stories of a faith. I don't believe God created the world in 7 days a few thousand years ago. I do believe in some bigger power, force or design principle that 'God' represents. It's not about convenience of argument, it's about remembering that the bible is a book of its time - a time when theories like evolution weren't available for people to make sense of the world around them. That said, if people DO believe in creationism I'd prefer we could have a sensible debate rather than it being reduced to the level of just calling them stupid and talking about Jesus riding dinosaurs. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" If you truly believe in your argument, then argue against them. Ruby, you argue on other threads for things you do and believe in. Why not on a religious thread? I see why you would feel that people were being insensitive, but I don't see where anyone has been hateful. Engage in the debate. I come from a place where the opposite viewpoint is held. In the US, atheists are considered completely untrustworthy and disreputable. Religion is the word, and if you disagree you get all sorts of labels and assumptions aimed at you. I never sat back in a debate and said how unfair the other side was. I argued my reasoning. I was, in effect, in the same situation you are in now. I personally think I had it better because it is easier to defend scientific findings then it is to defend dinosaurs with saddles on their backs (see my post above about my experience with creationism), but still, if you believe, then defend it. -Courtney Courtney, who in this thread has defended the idea of dinosaurs with saddles on their backs? You're not debating what's in the thread. The Pope agrees with the Big Bang theory and evolution - fact. He just believes that it is not inconsistent with a creator. The debate should not be about what fundamentalists believe but should be about a much more matured view of the argument from both sides in my opinion. I stress I am not a creationist and do not consider myself to be religious, my background is definitely scientific but I agree that there is at times an unjustified hostility towards people of religious faith in these types of debates. The bottom line is that the majority of science believes that something can come from nothing. Modern creationists believe that something can only come from something else." The thread was about creationism vs evolution. It wasn't about religion in general. I am telling you that I have had a lot of experience with creationists. Probably more than you. I have been to their churches and I have talked to their followers. The dinosaur with a saddle on is a REAL experience. We should be sticking to the OP. I'm not arguing against religion here. I'm arguing against creationism. Try looking into the type of stuff creationists have tried to get away with in American schools, then tell me we shouldn't be debating the fundamentalists. And by the way, science doesn't believe that everything came from nothing. The great thing about science is that it doesn't claim to know anything about which it doesn't have evidence. It's why I like it so much. -Courtney | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It is impossible to argue a point of view in the face of such hostility and almost abusive comments. One starts and the others follow Whilst in most other matters this kind of language will not be considered appropriate, it is when targeted towards any religious belief. Quite sad, really Totally agree This I find to be true on here too. Especially where that religious belief is Christianity The hostility against those who have a faith is staggering on here. To be fair though each of the big the abrahamic faiths say everyone here should be brutally murdered then tortured for all time. Here's a prime example, right on cue. As usual, you're deliberately conflating what the Old Testament says with which what actual practicing Christians mostly do, say and believe. Which does NOT involve brutal murder or torture. This is the equivalent of stating that all Brits are perpetrators of slavery because it used to be permitted under our law. You've never read the bible have you? Especially say revelations? You should. Yes, I've read the Bible. How about you read and understand what my comment above actually says and means? Great so have I. So while you're suffering in the absence of God's presence for all eternity (for the nice option) or burning for all eternity (the kjv option). Would you describe either option as torture? My interpretation of Revelations is as an allegory. It's a metaphor for spiritual struggle. It's not supposed to be real. Why are you basing your view of Christian people solely on the more over dramatic books of the Bible? On a book written centuries ago which is wedded to its cultural and political context? Ruby, can I ask, do you similarly read the rest of the bible as an allegory? And if not, then how do you choose what is allegorical and what isn't? Is it convenience of argument? This would effectively solve the OP as anyone believing in the bible as an allegory, wouldn't need to rest on creationism. -Courtney I don't think there is any incompatibility between being a Christian and believing in evolution. I believe in the bible as a book of allegories, as the stories of a faith. I don't believe God created the world in 7 days a few thousand years ago. I do believe in some bigger power, force or design principle that 'God' represents. It's not about convenience of argument, it's about remembering that the bible is a book of its time - a time when theories like evolution weren't available for people to make sense of the world around them. That said, if people DO believe in creationism I'd prefer we could have a sensible debate rather than it being reduced to the level of just calling them stupid and talking about Jesus riding dinosaurs. " I agree that we should have a sensible debate. But ignoring creationist beliefs is not part of that. Many Christian fundamentalists (most notably the young earth creationists) do believe that humans lived concurrently with dinosaurs. It follows naturally from reading the bible literally, as many creationists do. If god created everything, including humans, in 7 days, then it makes sense that humans lived alongside dinosaurs. I now understand that you don't take a literal interpretation of the bible, but that doesn't mean that lots of other people out there don't. Watch a US republican primary debate and count the number of hands that go up when they are asked if they believe in evolution. Did you ever wonder why they even have to ask that question? -Courtney | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It is impossible to argue a point of view in the face of such hostility and almost abusive comments. One starts and the others follow Whilst in most other matters this kind of language will not be considered appropriate, it is when targeted towards any religious belief. Quite sad, really Totally agree This I find to be true on here too. Especially where that religious belief is Christianity The hostility against those who have a faith is staggering on here. To be fair though each of the big the abrahamic faiths say everyone here should be brutally murdered then tortured for all time. Here's a prime example, right on cue. As usual, you're deliberately conflating what the Old Testament says with which what actual practicing Christians mostly do, say and believe. Which does NOT involve brutal murder or torture. This is the equivalent of stating that all Brits are perpetrators of slavery because it used to be permitted under our law. You've never read the bible have you? Especially say revelations? You should. Yes, I've read the Bible. How about you read and understand what my comment above actually says and means? Great so have I. So while you're suffering in the absence of God's presence for all eternity (for the nice option) or burning for all eternity (the kjv option). Would you describe either option as torture? My interpretation of Revelations is as an allegory. It's a metaphor for spiritual struggle. It's not supposed to be real. Why are you basing your view of Christian people solely on the more over dramatic books of the Bible? On a book written centuries ago which is wedded to its cultural and political context? Ruby, can I ask, do you similarly read the rest of the bible as an allegory? And if not, then how do you choose what is allegorical and what isn't? Is it convenience of argument? This would effectively solve the OP as anyone believing in the bible as an allegory, wouldn't need to rest on creationism. -Courtney I don't think there is any incompatibility between being a Christian and believing in evolution. I believe in the bible as a book of allegories, as the stories of a faith. I don't believe God created the world in 7 days a few thousand years ago. I do believe in some bigger power, force or design principle that 'God' represents. It's not about convenience of argument, it's about remembering that the bible is a book of its time - a time when theories like evolution weren't available for people to make sense of the world around them. That said, if people DO believe in creationism I'd prefer we could have a sensible debate rather than it being reduced to the level of just calling them stupid and talking about Jesus riding dinosaurs. I agree that we should have a sensible debate. But ignoring creationist beliefs is not part of that. Many Christian fundamentalists (most notably the young earth creationists) do believe that humans lived concurrently with dinosaurs. It follows naturally from reading the bible literally, as many creationists do. If god created everything, including humans, in 7 days, then it makes sense that humans lived alongside dinosaurs. I now understand that you don't take a literal interpretation of the bible, but that doesn't mean that lots of other people out there don't. Watch a US republican primary debate and count the number of hands that go up when they are asked if they believe in evolution. Did you ever wonder why they even have to ask that question? -Courtney" I'm not ignoring creationist beliefs, I'm just saying that they aren't part of my understanding of creationism. And this is why I disagree on a really basic level with lumping "Christians" together as one homogenous group who believe in Genesis as the literal interpretation of Christianity and torture and hellfire as real states of being, as has been done above. It's not my experience of being Christian. I genuinely don't know a single person who believes in a literal interpretation of the Bible or other Abrahamic text, and the vast majority of my family and friends identify as Christian or Muslim. I'm not sure what US Republican debates are supposed to have to do with me believing in God and identifying as a Christian. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It is impossible to argue a point of view in the face of such hostility and almost abusive comments. One starts and the others follow Whilst in most other matters this kind of language will not be considered appropriate, it is when targeted towards any religious belief. Quite sad, really Totally agree This I find to be true on here too. Especially where that religious belief is Christianity The hostility against those who have a faith is staggering on here. To be fair though each of the big the abrahamic faiths say everyone here should be brutally murdered then tortured for all time. Here's a prime example, right on cue. As usual, you're deliberately conflating what the Old Testament says with which what actual practicing Christians mostly do, say and believe. Which does NOT involve brutal murder or torture. This is the equivalent of stating that all Brits are perpetrators of slavery because it used to be permitted under our law. You've never read the bible have you? Especially say revelations? You should. Yes, I've read the Bible. How about you read and understand what my comment above actually says and means? Great so have I. So while you're suffering in the absence of God's presence for all eternity (for the nice option) or burning for all eternity (the kjv option). Would you describe either option as torture? My interpretation of Revelations is as an allegory. It's a metaphor for spiritual struggle. It's not supposed to be real. Why are you basing your view of Christian people solely on the more over dramatic books of the Bible? On a book written centuries ago which is wedded to its cultural and political context? Ruby, can I ask, do you similarly read the rest of the bible as an allegory? And if not, then how do you choose what is allegorical and what isn't? Is it convenience of argument? This would effectively solve the OP as anyone believing in the bible as an allegory, wouldn't need to rest on creationism. -Courtney I don't think there is any incompatibility between being a Christian and believing in evolution. I believe in the bible as a book of allegories, as the stories of a faith. I don't believe God created the world in 7 days a few thousand years ago. I do believe in some bigger power, force or design principle that 'God' represents. It's not about convenience of argument, it's about remembering that the bible is a book of its time - a time when theories like evolution weren't available for people to make sense of the world around them. That said, if people DO believe in creationism I'd prefer we could have a sensible debate rather than it being reduced to the level of just calling them stupid and talking about Jesus riding dinosaurs. I agree that we should have a sensible debate. But ignoring creationist beliefs is not part of that. Many Christian fundamentalists (most notably the young earth creationists) do believe that humans lived concurrently with dinosaurs. It follows naturally from reading the bible literally, as many creationists do. If god created everything, including humans, in 7 days, then it makes sense that humans lived alongside dinosaurs. I now understand that you don't take a literal interpretation of the bible, but that doesn't mean that lots of other people out there don't. Watch a US republican primary debate and count the number of hands that go up when they are asked if they believe in evolution. Did you ever wonder why they even have to ask that question? -Courtney I'm not ignoring creationist beliefs, I'm just saying that they aren't part of my understanding of creationism. And this is why I disagree on a really basic level with lumping "Christians" together as one homogenous group who believe in Genesis as the literal interpretation of Christianity and torture and hellfire as real states of being, as has been done above. It's not my experience of being Christian. I genuinely don't know a single person who believes in a literal interpretation of the Bible or other Abrahamic text, and the vast majority of my family and friends identify as Christian or Muslim. I'm not sure what US Republican debates are supposed to have to do with me believing in God and identifying as a Christian." The debate doesn't have to do with you personally. It is illustrative of my point about dinosaurs, which you took specific issue with. And I agree, Christians should not all be lumped together as one. But I personally am arguing on this thread against a specific type of creationism with which I have had a lot of experience, which is very commonly found around the US, and with which I wholeheartedly disagree. That isn't necessarily your version of creationism (or Christianity for that matter). And that's fine. But I'm not "reducing" your argument to this "level." I am pointing out a level that is already widely believed, and arguing against that. -Courtney | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I've always liked: "I permit no woman to teach or have authority over men; she is to keep silent." Timothy 2:11 " My dad would like that one too | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" The debate doesn't have to do with you personally. It is illustrative of my point about dinosaurs, which you took specific issue with. And I agree, Christians should not all be lumped together as one. But I personally am arguing on this thread against a specific type of creationism with which I have had a lot of experience, which is very commonly found around the US, and with which I wholeheartedly disagree. That isn't necessarily your version of creationism (or Christianity for that matter). And that's fine. But I'm not "reducing" your argument to this "level." I am pointing out a level that is already widely believed, and arguing against that. -Courtney" I didn't take specific issue with your points, but you addressed a specific question to me which I am explaining my answer to. My broader point which is not aimed at you or anyone else in particular is that if fundamentalist and creationist beliefs are so dangerous, then it would help if the more moderate voices of religion were not mocked and belittled whenever they speak up. If anyone mentions they believe in a God, it's "oh but creationists", or Catholicism "oh but paedophile priests" and everything gets drowned in a sea of forum groupthink identikit "religion=stupid people" responses. I can't think of any other type of discussion where that happens to such a degree. Maybe bareback. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" The debate doesn't have to do with you personally. It is illustrative of my point about dinosaurs, which you took specific issue with. And I agree, Christians should not all be lumped together as one. But I personally am arguing on this thread against a specific type of creationism with which I have had a lot of experience, which is very commonly found around the US, and with which I wholeheartedly disagree. That isn't necessarily your version of creationism (or Christianity for that matter). And that's fine. But I'm not "reducing" your argument to this "level." I am pointing out a level that is already widely believed, and arguing against that. -Courtney I didn't take specific issue with your points, but you addressed a specific question to me which I am explaining my answer to. My broader point which is not aimed at you or anyone else in particular is that if fundamentalist and creationist beliefs are so dangerous, then it would help if the more moderate voices of religion were not mocked and belittled whenever they speak up. If anyone mentions they believe in a God, it's "oh but creationists", or Catholicism "oh but paedophile priests" and everything gets drowned in a sea of forum groupthink identikit "religion=stupid people" responses. I can't think of any other type of discussion where that happens to such a degree. Maybe bareback. " I see where you're coming from. I guess I just don't agree with the forum groupthink bit, and I took issue with others who posted saying the same thing. Just because people believe in and argue a certain thing, doesn't mean it is groupthink, or sheeple, or whatever else people want to call it. I believe what I do because of me. As, I'm sure, do you. I don't think people who believe in religion are just doing it because of "groupthink." it's just that a majority of people on the thread don't agree with religion. So those who do should argue against it. Some people did that, and kudos to them. That is the point of debate. If lots of people disagree with me, then it makes it a challenge, often a fun one, to disagree and argue my point back. Maybe I'm just weird for finding this fun. Though I do agree that the debate should remain rational and not be reduced to personal attacks, but then I don't think that has happened on this thread. -Courtney | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What is a mutation? A mutation is a permanent change in the sequence of DNA. In order for an observable effect, mutations must occur in gene exons or regulatory elements. Changes in the non-coding regions of DNA (introns and junk DNA) generally do not affect function. What causes mutations? Mutations can be caused by external (exogenous) or endogenous (native) factors, or they may be caused by errors in the cellular machinery. Physical or chemical agents that induce mutations in DNA are called mutagens and are said to be mutagenic. Exogenous factors: environmental factors such as sunlight, radiation, and smoking can cause mutations. Endogenous factors: errors during DNA replication can lead to genetic changes as can toxic by-products of cellular metabolism. What are the consequences of mutations? Mutations can be advantageous and lead to an evolutionary advantage of a certain genotype. Mutations can also be deleterious, causing disease, developmental delays, structural abnormalities, or other effects. Types of Mutations: There are several classes of mutations described below. The original sequence is shown on the top with the mutated sequence below it. The genetic sequence is shown in black while the protein sequence is in blue. Changes in sequence are highlighted by yellow. To see what these mutations look like when sequenced, click here. Deletion Genetic material is removed or deleted. A few bases can be deleted (as shown on the left) or it can be complete or partial loss of a chromosome (shown on right). Frameshift The insertion or deletion of a number of bases that is not a multiple of 3. This alters the reading frame of the gene and frequently results in a premature stop codon and protein truncation. Insertion When genetic material is put into another region of DNA. This may be the insertion of 1 or more bases, or it can be part of one chromosome being inserted into another, non-homologous chromosome. Missense A change in DNA sequence that changes the codon to a different amino acid. Not all missense mutations are deleterious, some changes can have no effect. Because of the ambiguity of missense mutations, it is often difficult to interpret the consequences of these mutations in causing disease. Nonsense A change in the genetic code that results in the coding for a stop codon rather than an amino acid. The shortened protein is generally non-function or its function is impeded. Point A single base change in DNA sequence. A point mutation may be silent, missense, or nonsense. Silent A change in the genetic sequence that does not change the protein sequence. This can occur because of redundancy in the genetic code where an amino acid may be encoded for by multiple codons. Splice Site A change in the genetic sequence that occurs at the boundary of the exons and introns. The consensus sequences at these boundaries signal where to cut out introns and rejoin exons in the mRNA. A change in these sequences can eliminate splicing at that site which would change the reading frame and protein sequence. Translocation A structural abnormality of chromosomes where genetic material is exchanged between two or more non-homologous chromosomes. Good site, i haven't plagarised it honest. Taken that from an edu site. In answer to that I would say go on YouTube and type in "Dr Grady McMurtry survival of the fittest part 1". Then after watch part 2 and 3, total 3 episodes is about half an hour I think? Would take me ages to type out a reply so just easier to watch the video instead. " I'd pit my man Mr Attenborough against your man lol I'd usually suggest evolution is a concept to be understood rather than belived | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Believing in a "God" is one thing! Call it a sense of spirituality or a oneness with the universe, in a strange way we actually are, were all made of stardust and we all share the four most abundant elements hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen and carbon! I would never argue that the universe is vast and holds many wonders and things we don't know and might never know but that's a far cry from saying or referring that creationism has an equal standing with evolution... It doesn't there's practically no evidence at all for creationism whereas there's massive amounts of evidence for evolution and theres again practically no evidence for a creator but alot of evidence and a good theory for a big bang (yes there's plenty of scientists that catheirs how you get something from nothing, try Laurence krauss,s book the universe from nothing). Now if you choose to belive something that has very little or no evidence at all, you should expect to be quizzed and ridiculed for your ridiculous beliefs, just like conspiracy theorists get ridiculed for theirs! Also if you choose to clump together with your beliefs and then try to instill doctrine and laws from your "crazy" beliefs then you certainly should be ridiculed." Quiz, debate, challenge of course but ridicule? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Ah! This is the one I was looking for: "Happy shall he be, that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the stones." Psalm 137:9 Stone unruly children to death " See now that kind of thing should be more prominent in their advertising. Much better hook than don't envy you neighbours cow. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Believing in a "God" is one thing! Call it a sense of spirituality or a oneness with the universe, in a strange way we actually are, were all made of stardust and we all share the four most abundant elements hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen and carbon! I would never argue that the universe is vast and holds many wonders and things we don't know and might never know but that's a far cry from saying or referring that creationism has an equal standing with evolution... It doesn't there's practically no evidence at all for creationism whereas there's massive amounts of evidence for evolution and theres again practically no evidence for a creator but alot of evidence and a good theory for a big bang (yes there's plenty of scientists that catheirs how you get something from nothing, try Laurence krauss,s book the universe from nothing). Now if you choose to belive something that has very little or no evidence at all, you should expect to be quizzed and ridiculed for your ridiculous beliefs, just like conspiracy theorists get ridiculed for theirs! Also if you choose to clump together with your beliefs and then try to instill doctrine and laws from your "crazy" beliefs then you certainly should be ridiculed. Quiz, debate, challenge of course but ridicule? " . Yes ridicule the ridiculous, there's no better examination of beliefs than ridicule! Of course you can't ridicule beliefs that have foundation or evidence or even a good theory.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
""Belief" is the acceptance of an idea, a dream, an image in your mind... Therefore, if you "believe" in a god you are stating that the god isn't real..... Simples..!!! " I see it more as belief because God is not something which can be empirically proven as a "fact". It requires faith because it can't be proven. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
""Belief" is the acceptance of an idea, a dream, an image in your mind... Therefore, if you "believe" in a god you are stating that the god isn't real..... Simples..!!! " Likewise if you "believe" in evolution. No one was around when the big bang happened and no one was around when life came into being from nothingness (both beliefs held by evolutionists). These events were not observed by anyone. The big bang and creating life from nothingness cannot be re-created in a science lab so they have to be "believed" to have happened. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
""Belief" is the acceptance of an idea, a dream, an image in your mind... Therefore, if you "believe" in a god you are stating that the god isn't real..... Simples..!!! " I believe I'm about to drive home. How does that fit in with your definition?. Clearly just because you believe in something that does not mean that it can only be an idea, a dream or an image. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
""Belief" is the acceptance of an idea, a dream, an image in your mind... Therefore, if you "believe" in a god you are stating that the god isn't real..... Simples..!!! Likewise if you "believe" in evolution. No one was around when the big bang happened and no one was around when life came into being from nothingness (both beliefs held by evolutionists). These events were not observed by anyone. The big bang and creating life from nothingness cannot be re-created in a science lab so they have to be "believed" to have happened. " . What!... You know that thing called err science, you know the one that proved dinosaurs existed without any humans seeing them, it's called enquiry with a theory that fits the observable data, then you do some experiments and record lots of other data and you try to prove your theory WRONG.. The harder you find it to prove your theory WRONG the more you can assume your theory is valid, facts like the earth not being as old as the sun,galaxies moving away from each other and other stuff we observe leads to conclusions like a big bang. It's not that I don't wish it to be created, it's just that there's no evidence to support it!... And we've looked really really hard | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There's no evidence for a creator, so go figure the difference between evolution and creationism. Follow the money and you just might see why some have a vested interest in creationism. And greed for power a close second. " There is a big difference between creationism and evolution. One is based solely on faith and belief, the other is based on research and evidence. To deny the evidence and research because it does not fit in with a pre-defined belief is to leave yourself open to ridicule. However, whilst a fundamentalist believe that this world was created in 7 days is clearly not backed up by scientific evidence, in fact quite the contrary, there is scientific evidence of a point of creation for the universe, that everything was created from nothing. How that actually happened is for all a matter of faith and/or belief. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"There's no evidence for a creator, so go figure the difference between evolution and creationism. Follow the money and you just might see why some have a vested interest in creationism. And greed for power a close second. There is a big difference between creationism and evolution. One is based solely on faith and belief, the other is based on research and evidence. To deny the evidence and research because it does not fit in with a pre-defined belief is to leave yourself open to ridicule. However, whilst a fundamentalist believe that this world was created in 7 days is clearly not backed up by scientific evidence, in fact quite the contrary, there is scientific evidence of a point of creation for the universe, that everything was created from nothing. How that actually happened is for all a matter of faith and/or belief. " the world was made in 6 days. on the 7th day he rested. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
""Belief" is the acceptance of an idea, a dream, an image in your mind... Therefore, if you "believe" in a god you are stating that the god isn't real..... Simples..!!! Likewise if you "believe" in evolution. No one was around when the big bang happened and no one was around when life came into being from nothingness (both beliefs held by evolutionists). These events were not observed by anyone. The big bang and creating life from nothingness cannot be re-created in a science lab so they have to be "believed" to have happened. . What!... You know that thing called err science, you know the one that proved dinosaurs existed without any humans seeing them, it's called enquiry with a theory that fits the observable data, then you do some experiments and record lots of other data and you try to prove your theory WRONG.. The harder you find it to prove your theory WRONG the more you can assume your theory is valid, facts like the earth not being as old as the sun,galaxies moving away from each other and other stuff we observe leads to conclusions like a big bang. It's not that I don't wish it to be created, it's just that there's no evidence to support it!... And we've looked really really hard " Amazing answer! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
""Belief" is the acceptance of an idea, a dream, an image in your mind... Therefore, if you "believe" in a god you are stating that the god isn't real..... Simples..!!! Likewise if you "believe" in evolution. No one was around when the big bang happened and no one was around when life came into being from nothingness (both beliefs held by evolutionists). These events were not observed by anyone. The big bang and creating life from nothingness cannot be re-created in a science lab so they have to be "believed" to have happened. . What!... You know that thing called err science, you know the one that proved dinosaurs existed without any humans seeing them, it's called enquiry with a theory that fits the observable data, then you do some experiments and record lots of other data and you try to prove your theory WRONG.. The harder you find it to prove your theory WRONG the more you can assume your theory is valid, facts like the earth not being as old as the sun,galaxies moving away from each other and other stuff we observe leads to conclusions like a big bang. It's not that I don't wish it to be created, it's just that there's no evidence to support it!... And we've looked really really hard Amazing answer! " No not really an amazing answer at all when you bother to break it down. Dinosaurs existed without humans ever seeing them, how do I know thats true? Well you see we have these things called fossils, that's tangible evidence you can hold in your hand and examine in a science lab. You cannot examine or re-create the big bang in a science lab and you cannot create life from nothingness in a science lab. If a big bang did happen then who is to say it happened by random chance or some sort of creator made it happen? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
""Belief" is the acceptance of an idea, a dream, an image in your mind... Therefore, if you "believe" in a god you are stating that the god isn't real..... Simples..!!! Likewise if you "believe" in evolution. No one was around when the big bang happened and no one was around when life came into being from nothingness (both beliefs held by evolutionists). These events were not observed by anyone. The big bang and creating life from nothingness cannot be re-created in a science lab so they have to be "believed" to have happened. . What!... You know that thing called err science, you know the one that proved dinosaurs existed without any humans seeing them, it's called enquiry with a theory that fits the observable data, then you do some experiments and record lots of other data and you try to prove your theory WRONG.. The harder you find it to prove your theory WRONG the more you can assume your theory is valid, facts like the earth not being as old as the sun,galaxies moving away from each other and other stuff we observe leads to conclusions like a big bang. It's not that I don't wish it to be created, it's just that there's no evidence to support it!... And we've looked really really hard Amazing answer! No not really an amazing answer at all when you bother to break it down. Dinosaurs existed without humans ever seeing them, how do I know thats true? Well you see we have these things called fossils, that's tangible evidence you can hold in your hand and examine in a science lab. You cannot examine or re-create the big bang in a science lab and you cannot create life from nothingness in a science lab. If a big bang did happen then who is to say it happened by random chance or some sort of creator made it happen? " . I'm afraid to say there's a whole host of scientific data to point towards a big bang, turn on your tv and unplug the Ariel, or just tune between radio stations, that crackle (white noise) is background radiation left over from the big bang | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
""Belief" is the acceptance of an idea, a dream, an image in your mind... Therefore, if you "believe" in a god you are stating that the god isn't real..... Simples..!!! Likewise if you "believe" in evolution. No one was around when the big bang happened and no one was around when life came into being from nothingness (both beliefs held by evolutionists). These events were not observed by anyone. The big bang and creating life from nothingness cannot be re-created in a science lab so they have to be "believed" to have happened. . What!... You know that thing called err science, you know the one that proved dinosaurs existed without any humans seeing them, it's called enquiry with a theory that fits the observable data, then you do some experiments and record lots of other data and you try to prove your theory WRONG.. The harder you find it to prove your theory WRONG the more you can assume your theory is valid, facts like the earth not being as old as the sun,galaxies moving away from each other and other stuff we observe leads to conclusions like a big bang. It's not that I don't wish it to be created, it's just that there's no evidence to support it!... And we've looked really really hard Amazing answer! No not really an amazing answer at all when you bother to break it down. Dinosaurs existed without humans ever seeing them, how do I know thats true? Well you see we have these things called fossils, that's tangible evidence you can hold in your hand and examine in a science lab. You cannot examine or re-create the big bang in a science lab and you cannot create life from nothingness in a science lab. If a big bang did happen then who is to say it happened by random chance or some sort of creator made it happen? . I'm afraid to say there's a whole host of scientific data to point towards a big bang, turn on your tv and unplug the Ariel, or just tune between radio stations, that crackle (white noise) is background radiation left over from the big bang" As I said who is to say a big bang happened by random chance or a creator made it happen? Both positions are a matter of belief. You either believe it happened by random chance or you believe a creator made it happen. Evolution is based on belief from the starting point. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
back to top |