Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What is it? It isn't... at least not yet " so one day it will be something? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What is it? It isn't... at least not yet so one day it will be something?" if it exists... yes | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What is it? It isn't... at least not yet so one day it will be something? if it exists... yes " so you've created something out of nothing? cool. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What is it? It isn't... at least not yet so one day it will be something? if it exists... yes so you've created something out of nothing? cool." It's a theory at the moment. Only an idea. Its their excuse for why their maths is wrong. If we find it then it exists and their maths is saved by its existence. If we don't find it then basically they were just shit at maths | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Dark matter is a conjectural substance that goes, with dark energy to creating the missing 95.1% of the universe necessary to make our current cosmological model work." I'm having an argument with a friend atm about this - I have an awful feeling that we're looking for something that isn't there and that the problem of dark matter is simply a problem with our cosmological model. Like when we workout that the the earth goes round the sun, not vise versa. Something basic like has been misunderstood. imo Educate yourself: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What is it? It isn't... at least not yet so one day it will be something? if it exists... yes so you've created something out of nothing? cool. It's a theory at the moment. Only an idea. Its their excuse for why their maths is wrong. If we find it then it exists and their maths is saved by its existence. If we don't find it then basically they were just shit at maths " Actually, to be accurate, they weren't just shit at maths... they were 95.1% shit at maths That's a whole lot of shit! Which, coincidentally... is what dark matter is imo lol | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not sure,but it's easier to remove with wet wipes and after shave. " Pmsl!!! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What is it?" Well it really depends on what colour dark matter we're talking about here.... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Dark matter is a conjectural substance that goes, with dark energy to creating the missing 95.1% of the universe necessary to make our current cosmological model work. I'm having an argument with a friend atm about this - I have an awful feeling that we're looking for something that isn't there and that the problem of dark matter is simply a problem with our cosmological model. Like when we workout that the the earth goes round the sun, not vise versa. Something basic like has been misunderstood. imo Educate yourself: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter" Educate yourself? cheek, I have a maths degree... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Dark matter is a conjectural substance that goes, with dark energy to creating the missing 95.1% of the universe necessary to make our current cosmological model work. I'm having an argument with a friend atm about this - I have an awful feeling that we're looking for something that isn't there and that the problem of dark matter is simply a problem with our cosmological model. Like when we workout that the the earth goes round the sun, not vise versa. Something basic like has been misunderstood. imo Educate yourself: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter" you don't think all this missing matter is in the black holes at the centre of every galaxy? after all black holes were not even excepted when the missing 95.1% was calculated. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Dark matter is a conjectural substance that goes, with dark energy to creating the missing 95.1% of the universe necessary to make our current cosmological model work. I'm having an argument with a friend atm about this - I have an awful feeling that we're looking for something that isn't there and that the problem of dark matter is simply a problem with our cosmological model. Like when we workout that the the earth goes round the sun, not vise versa. Something basic like has been misunderstood. imo Educate yourself: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter you don't think all this missing matter is in the black holes at the centre of every galaxy? after all black holes were not even excepted when the missing 95.1% was calculated." That's not how black holes work. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is God " time started with the big bang. therefore they was no time before the big bang for god to exist to create the big bang. ergo, no god. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is God time started with the big bang. therefore they was no time before the big bang for god to exist to create the big bang. ergo, no god." I don't believe time started with the big bang | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Dark matter is a conjectural substance that goes, with dark energy to creating the missing 95.1% of the universe necessary to make our current cosmological model work. I'm having an argument with a friend atm about this - I have an awful feeling that we're looking for something that isn't there and that the problem of dark matter is simply a problem with our cosmological model. Like when we workout that the the earth goes round the sun, not vise versa. Something basic like has been misunderstood. imo Educate yourself: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter you don't think all this missing matter is in the black holes at the centre of every galaxy? after all black holes were not even excepted when the missing 95.1% was calculated. That's not how black holes work." there's no matter in black holes? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is God time started with the big bang. therefore they was no time before the big bang for god to exist to create the big bang. ergo, no god. I don't believe time started with the big bang " Furthermore... by saying that time started with the Big Bang it shows you haven't grasped Big Bang theory | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Dark matter is a conjectural substance that goes, with dark energy to creating the missing 95.1% of the universe necessary to make our current cosmological model work. I'm having an argument with a friend atm about this - I have an awful feeling that we're looking for something that isn't there and that the problem of dark matter is simply a problem with our cosmological model. Like when we workout that the the earth goes round the sun, not vise versa. Something basic like has been misunderstood. imo Educate yourself: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter you don't think all this missing matter is in the black holes at the centre of every galaxy? after all black holes were not even excepted when the missing 95.1% was calculated. That's not how black holes work. there's no matter in black holes?" well... there's probably a few of my missing socks | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Well, it is dark. And matter. And it matters. Beyond that, no one really knows yet. Got to love science." Science has caused some shit , but seriously and literally science has got us out the shit a lot more Science loves not knowing xx | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is God time started with the big bang. therefore they was no time before the big bang for god to exist to create the big bang. ergo, no god. I don't believe time started with the big bang " there are other thoughts but big bangs mine. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is God time started with the big bang. therefore they was no time before the big bang for god to exist to create the big bang. ergo, no god. I don't believe time started with the big bang there are other thoughts but big bangs mine." well not according to your own logic it isn't | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Well, it is dark. And matter. And it matters. Beyond that, no one really knows yet. Got to love science. Science has caused some shit , but seriously and literally science has got us out the shit a lot more Science loves not knowing xx" I hate not knowing.... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is God time started with the big bang. therefore they was no time before the big bang for god to exist to create the big bang. ergo, no god. I don't believe time started with the big bang there are other thoughts but big bangs mine. well not according to your own logic it isn't" explain! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Dark matter is a conjectural substance that goes, with dark energy to creating the missing 95.1% of the universe necessary to make our current cosmological model work. I'm having an argument with a friend atm about this - I have an awful feeling that we're looking for something that isn't there and that the problem of dark matter is simply a problem with our cosmological model. Like when we workout that the the earth goes round the sun, not vise versa. Something basic like has been misunderstood. imo Educate yourself: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter you don't think all this missing matter is in the black holes at the centre of every galaxy? after all black holes were not even excepted when the missing 95.1% was calculated. That's not how black holes work. there's no matter in black holes?" Yes, the core of a collapsed star. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is God time started with the big bang. therefore they was no time before the big bang for god to exist to create the big bang. ergo, no god. I don't believe time started with the big bang there are other thoughts but big bangs mine. well not according to your own logic it isn't explain!" Big Bang theory doesn't say the Big Bang created time... that's just some wild speculation that you've chosen to believe in | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is God time started with the big bang. therefore they was no time before the big bang for god to exist to create the big bang. ergo, no god. I don't believe time started with the big bang Furthermore... by saying that time started with the Big Bang it shows you haven't grasped Big Bang theory" Un fair he has grasped the one he read , it's possible I think , maybe , and a good stab with the data and maths available , however I don't think the currant expansion from singularity theory has enough supporting data | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Dark matter is a conjectural substance that goes, with dark energy to creating the missing 95.1% of the universe necessary to make our current cosmological model work. I'm having an argument with a friend atm about this - I have an awful feeling that we're looking for something that isn't there and that the problem of dark matter is simply a problem with our cosmological model. Like when we workout that the the earth goes round the sun, not vise versa. Something basic like has been misunderstood. imo Educate yourself: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter you don't think all this missing matter is in the black holes at the centre of every galaxy? after all black holes were not even excepted when the missing 95.1% was calculated. That's not how black holes work. there's no matter in black holes? Yes, the core of a collapsed star. " and every thing its sucked in in the last billion or so years... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Well, it is dark. And matter. And it matters. Beyond that, no one really knows yet. Got to love science. Science has caused some shit , but seriously and literally science has got us out the shit a lot more Science loves not knowing xx" Oh, yes. There is no model yet that can reliably predict whether a new model for an aeroplane will fly but we can land space craft on asteroids. Go figure. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is God time started with the big bang. therefore they was no time before the big bang for god to exist to create the big bang. ergo, no god. I don't believe time started with the big bang there are other thoughts but big bangs mine. well not according to your own logic it isn't explain! Big Bang theory doesn't say the Big Bang created time... that's just some wild speculation that you've chosen to believe in" every theory is wild speculation. and mine is as valid as yours. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is God time started with the big bang. therefore they was no time before the big bang for god to exist to create the big bang. ergo, no god. I don't believe time started with the big bang Furthermore... by saying that time started with the Big Bang it shows you haven't grasped Big Bang theory Un fair he has grasped the one he read , it's possible I think , maybe , and a good stab with the data and maths available , however I don't think the currant expansion from singularity theory has enough supporting data " From what I've read even the question "did time begin with the Big Bang?" is nonsense. It's a bit like asking what the sentence before the first sentence of a book was | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Well, it is dark. And matter. And it matters. Beyond that, no one really knows yet. Got to love science. Science has caused some shit , but seriously and literally science has got us out the shit a lot more Science loves not knowing xx I hate not knowing...." Don't live in hate, there will always be stuff we don't or cannot know xx | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Dark matter is a conjectural substance that goes, with dark energy to creating the missing 95.1% of the universe necessary to make our current cosmological model work. I'm having an argument with a friend atm about this - I have an awful feeling that we're looking for something that isn't there and that the problem of dark matter is simply a problem with our cosmological model. Like when we workout that the the earth goes round the sun, not vise versa. Something basic like has been misunderstood. imo Educate yourself: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter you don't think all this missing matter is in the black holes at the centre of every galaxy? after all black holes were not even excepted when the missing 95.1% was calculated. That's not how black holes work. there's no matter in black holes? Yes, the core of a collapsed star. and every thing its sucked in in the last billion or so years..." The massive gravity destroys much of it. What survives is expelled out the other side just in a different form. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is God time started with the big bang. therefore they was no time before the big bang for god to exist to create the big bang. ergo, no god. I don't believe time started with the big bang there are other thoughts but big bangs mine. well not according to your own logic it isn't explain! Big Bang theory doesn't say the Big Bang created time... that's just some wild speculation that you've chosen to believe in every theory is wild speculation. and mine is as valid as yours." That's cool... but your theory isn't Big Bang theory as the Big Bang started after time had already started. So somehow you've managed to do what no other scientist has done and rewind the clock to zero. Well done | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Dark matter is a conjectural substance that goes, with dark energy to creating the missing 95.1% of the universe necessary to make our current cosmological model work. I'm having an argument with a friend atm about this - I have an awful feeling that we're looking for something that isn't there and that the problem of dark matter is simply a problem with our cosmological model. Like when we workout that the the earth goes round the sun, not vise versa. Something basic like has been misunderstood. imo Educate yourself: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter you don't think all this missing matter is in the black holes at the centre of every galaxy? after all black holes were not even excepted when the missing 95.1% was calculated. That's not how black holes work. there's no matter in black holes? Yes, the core of a collapsed star. and every thing its sucked in in the last billion or so years... The massive gravity destroys much of it. What survives is expelled out the other side just in a different form." out the other side? as in worm hole? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"That's not how black holes work. there's no matter in black holes? Yes, the core of a collapsed star. and every thing its sucked in in the last billion or so years... The massive gravity destroys much of it. What survives is expelled out the other side just in a different form." Tha other side? Is that anywhere near Lewisham? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Well, it is dark. And matter. And it matters. Beyond that, no one really knows yet. Got to love science. Science has caused some shit , but seriously and literally science has got us out the shit a lot more Science loves not knowing xx Oh, yes. There is no model yet that can reliably predict whether a new model for an aeroplane will fly but we can land space craft on asteroids. Go figure." I think you have illustrated your exceptional grasp of science, engineering, physics and statistics in your above x | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is God time started with the big bang. therefore they was no time before the big bang for god to exist to create the big bang. ergo, no god. I don't believe time started with the big bang there are other thoughts but big bangs mine. well not according to your own logic it isn't explain! Big Bang theory doesn't say the Big Bang created time... that's just some wild speculation that you've chosen to believe in every theory is wild speculation. and mine is as valid as yours. That's cool... but your theory isn't Big Bang theory as the Big Bang started after time had already started. So somehow you've managed to do what no other scientist has done and rewind the clock to zero. Well done " there we shall have to agree to disagree. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Dark matter is a conjectural substance that goes, with dark energy to creating the missing 95.1% of the universe necessary to make our current cosmological model work. I'm having an argument with a friend atm about this - I have an awful feeling that we're looking for something that isn't there and that the problem of dark matter is simply a problem with our cosmological model. Like when we workout that the the earth goes round the sun, not vise versa. Something basic like has been misunderstood. imo Educate yourself: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter you don't think all this missing matter is in the black holes at the centre of every galaxy? after all black holes were not even excepted when the missing 95.1% was calculated. That's not how black holes work. there's no matter in black holes? Yes, the core of a collapsed star. and every thing its sucked in in the last billion or so years... The massive gravity destroys much of it. What survives is expelled out the other side just in a different form. out the other side? as in worm hole?" No. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is God time started with the big bang. therefore they was no time before the big bang for god to exist to create the big bang. ergo, no god. I don't believe time started with the big bang there are other thoughts but big bangs mine. well not according to your own logic it isn't explain! Big Bang theory doesn't say the Big Bang created time... that's just some wild speculation that you've chosen to believe in every theory is wild speculation. and mine is as valid as yours." I think the trouble with yours in comparison to mine is that yours is theologically motivated whilst mine is not. You are asking us to believe that something we know exists and can't possibly imagine ever ending somehow started... just because that's where the maths runs out and you don't want to allow any room for a god to possibly exist. I'd say the burden of proof lies on your shoulders. I, on the other hand, regardless of whether it helps the notion of a god existing or not, simply refuse to accept the logic that time began. Instead, it seems obvious... nay axiomatic... that it didn't. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is God time started with the big bang. therefore they was no time before the big bang for god to exist to create the big bang. ergo, no god. I don't believe time started with the big bang there are other thoughts but big bangs mine. well not according to your own logic it isn't explain! Big Bang theory doesn't say the Big Bang created time... that's just some wild speculation that you've chosen to believe in every theory is wild speculation. and mine is as valid as yours. That's cool... but your theory isn't Big Bang theory as the Big Bang started after time had already started. So somehow you've managed to do what no other scientist has done and rewind the clock to zero. Well done there we shall have to agree to disagree." Umm sorry.. this is just a fact its not a matter of opinion. It's like differing over whether horses have 54 legs or not lol | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is God time started with the big bang. therefore they was no time before the big bang for god to exist to create the big bang. ergo, no god. I don't believe time started with the big bang there are other thoughts but big bangs mine. well not according to your own logic it isn't explain! Big Bang theory doesn't say the Big Bang created time... that's just some wild speculation that you've chosen to believe in every theory is wild speculation. and mine is as valid as yours. That's cool... but your theory isn't Big Bang theory as the Big Bang started after time had already started. So somehow you've managed to do what no other scientist has done and rewind the clock to zero. Well done there we shall have to agree to disagree. Umm sorry.. this is just a fact its not a matter of opinion. It's like differing over whether horses have 54 legs or not lol " not fact. and hawking's agrees with me. or I agree with him. who agrees with you? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Well, it is dark. And matter. And it matters. Beyond that, no one really knows yet. Got to love science. Science has caused some shit , but seriously and literally science has got us out the shit a lot more Science loves not knowing xx Oh, yes. There is no model yet that can reliably predict whether a new model for an aeroplane will fly but we can land space craft on asteroids. Go figure. I think you have illustrated your exceptional grasp of science, engineering, physics and statistics in your above x " Of course. The formula is? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is God time started with the big bang. therefore they was no time before the big bang for god to exist to create the big bang. ergo, no god. I don't believe time started with the big bang " Same here, time have always existed, the scientist cant get their head around it so made this big bang theory to be believable. As humans have to have answers to everything, infact space have always existed. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is God time started with the big bang. therefore they was no time before the big bang for god to exist to create the big bang. ergo, no god. I don't believe time started with the big bang there are other thoughts but big bangs mine. well not according to your own logic it isn't explain! Big Bang theory doesn't say the Big Bang created time... that's just some wild speculation that you've chosen to believe in every theory is wild speculation. and mine is as valid as yours. That's cool... but your theory isn't Big Bang theory as the Big Bang started after time had already started. So somehow you've managed to do what no other scientist has done and rewind the clock to zero. Well done there we shall have to agree to disagree. Umm sorry.. this is just a fact its not a matter of opinion. It's like differing over whether horses have 54 legs or not lol not fact. and hawking's agrees with me. or I agree with him. who agrees with you?" Lol You really think you're right on this don't you. Most cosmologists say that space and time are infinite. And you've misinterpretted Hawking's remarks. Hawking doesn't BELIEVE that time did not exist before the Big Bang. His remarks that we should pretend that time began with the Big Bang are motivated by epistemological reasons i.e. the fact that the question lies beyond the limits of human knowledge. The fact is that we don't have the answer to that question and we may never have the answer to that question, so Hawking's solution is to ignore it. I believe that there is no reason to believe it didn't exist. And most cosmoloists would agree with me. Perhaps, if you need answers so much maybe you should become a Christian or a Muslim or something... I hear they've got whole books full of answers for you | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Well, it is dark. And matter. And it matters. Beyond that, no one really knows yet. Got to love science. Science has caused some shit , but seriously and literally science has got us out the shit a lot more Science loves not knowing xx Oh, yes. There is no model yet that can reliably predict whether a new model for an aeroplane will fly but we can land space craft on asteroids. Go figure. I think you have illustrated your exceptional grasp of science, engineering, physics and statistics in your above x Of course. The formula is?" E=MC Hammer | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Well, it is dark. And matter. And it matters. Beyond that, no one really knows yet. Got to love science. Science has caused some shit , but seriously and literally science has got us out the shit a lot more Science loves not knowing xx Oh, yes. There is no model yet that can reliably predict whether a new model for an aeroplane will fly but we can land space craft on asteroids. Go figure. I think you have illustrated your exceptional grasp of science, engineering, physics and statistics in your above x Of course. The formula is? E=MC Hammer " There is no formula. Whoever finds one will be very rich. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is God time started with the big bang. therefore they was no time before the big bang for god to exist to create the big bang. ergo, no god. I don't believe time started with the big bang there are other thoughts but big bangs mine. well not according to your own logic it isn't explain! Big Bang theory doesn't say the Big Bang created time... that's just some wild speculation that you've chosen to believe in every theory is wild speculation. and mine is as valid as yours. That's cool... but your theory isn't Big Bang theory as the Big Bang started after time had already started. So somehow you've managed to do what no other scientist has done and rewind the clock to zero. Well done there we shall have to agree to disagree. Umm sorry.. this is just a fact its not a matter of opinion. It's like differing over whether horses have 54 legs or not lol not fact. and hawking's agrees with me. or I agree with him. who agrees with you? Lol You really think you're right on this don't you. Most cosmologists say that space and time are infinite. And you've misinterpretted Hawking's remarks. Hawking doesn't BELIEVE that time did not exist before the Big Bang. His remarks that we should pretend that time began with the Big Bang are motivated by epistemological reasons i.e. the fact that the question lies beyond the limits of human knowledge. The fact is that we don't have the answer to that question and we may never have the answer to that question, so Hawking's solution is to ignore it. I believe that there is no reason to believe it didn't exist. And most cosmoloists would agree with me. Perhaps, if you need answers so much maybe you should become a Christian or a Muslim or something... I hear they've got whole books full of answers for you " Question. if you travelled to the edge of the universe past the last galaxy and looked out. what would you see? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's a sci-fi programme... Been watching it " You beat me to it. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Question. if you travelled to the edge of the universe past the last galaxy and looked out. what would you see?" Go on then... I'm game. You tell me... what would I see? Most curious | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Well, it is dark. And matter. And it matters. Beyond that, no one really knows yet. Got to love science. Science has caused some shit , but seriously and literally science has got us out the shit a lot more Science loves not knowing xx Oh, yes. There is no model yet that can reliably predict whether a new model for an aeroplane will fly but we can land space craft on asteroids. Go figure. I think you have illustrated your exceptional grasp of science, engineering, physics and statistics in your above x Of course. The formula is? E=MC Hammer There is no formula. Whoever finds one will be very rich. " The person who discovers a way to harness infinite energy will be rich What's you point ? Science methodology tries to answer difficult questions but diligently question each others hypothesis ? Openly admitting they do not know ? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Question. if you travelled to the edge of the universe past the last galaxy and looked out. what would you see? Go on then... I'm game. You tell me... what would I see? Most curious " I don't want to tell you, I was simply asking your opinion. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Question. if you travelled to the edge of the universe past the last galaxy and looked out. what would you see? Go on then... I'm game. You tell me... what would I see? Most curious I don't want to tell you, I was simply asking your opinion." Well you're asking someone who doesn't believe the universe has an edge what I'd find if I travelled to the edge. I think it'd be more fruitful if you, presumably a person who believes the universe has an edge, can tell me how you think that whole scenario plays out. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Well, it is dark. And matter. And it matters. Beyond that, no one really knows yet. Got to love science. Science has caused some shit , but seriously and literally science has got us out the shit a lot more Science loves not knowing xx Oh, yes. There is no model yet that can reliably predict whether a new model for an aeroplane will fly but we can land space craft on asteroids. Go figure. I think you have illustrated your exceptional grasp of science, engineering, physics and statistics in your above x Of course. The formula is? E=MC Hammer There is no formula. Whoever finds one will be very rich. The person who discovers a way to harness infinite energy will be rich " That's easy. You just need a cat, a slice of toast and some butter... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What is it?" Its those Ribena stains which won't wash out of a white blouse | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's a sci-fi programme... Been watching it " pretty enjoyable too, as is killjoys | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Question. if you travelled to the edge of the universe past the last galaxy and looked out. what would you see? Go on then... I'm game. You tell me... what would I see? Most curious I don't want to tell you, I was simply asking your opinion. Well you're asking someone who doesn't believe the universe has an edge what I'd find if I travelled to the edge. I think it'd be more fruitful if you, presumably a person who believes the universe has an edge, can tell me how you think that whole scenario plays out." ok. so in my way of thinking. there was a bang, a bubble formed. expanded. our universe. go to the edge and look out. I believe you will see other universes. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Question. if you travelled to the edge of the universe past the last galaxy and looked out. what would you see? Go on then... I'm game. You tell me... what would I see? Most curious I don't want to tell you, I was simply asking your opinion. Well you're asking someone who doesn't believe the universe has an edge what I'd find if I travelled to the edge. I think it'd be more fruitful if you, presumably a person who believes the universe has an edge, can tell me how you think that whole scenario plays out. ok. so in my way of thinking. there was a bang, a bubble formed. expanded. our universe. go to the edge and look out. I believe you will see other universes. " So despite believing that time was created by the Big Bang you're happy to imagine there were other universes BEFORE ours. Hmmm... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Question. if you travelled to the edge of the universe past the last galaxy and looked out. what would you see? Go on then... I'm game. You tell me... what would I see? Most curious I don't want to tell you, I was simply asking your opinion. Well you're asking someone who doesn't believe the universe has an edge what I'd find if I travelled to the edge. I think it'd be more fruitful if you, presumably a person who believes the universe has an edge, can tell me how you think that whole scenario plays out. ok. so in my way of thinking. there was a bang, a bubble formed. expanded. our universe. go to the edge and look out. I believe you will see other universes. So despite believing that time was created by the Big Bang you're happy to imagine there were other universes BEFORE ours. Hmmm... " no. the big bang was a flippant comment that ran away with itself. and the other universes don't have to be older. all part of some cycle. still getting to grips with it. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What is it? Its those Ribena stains which won't wash out of a white blouse" You've hit on something there Josie...though my thoughts on dark matter being the hard substance in the loo after consuming a bottle of Aldi Red Wine blows all of the other theories above totally out of the water | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What is it?" It is what some people emit about 2 days after a heavy night drinking Guinness. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Question. if you travelled to the edge of the universe past the last galaxy and looked out. what would you see? Go on then... I'm game. You tell me... what would I see? Most curious I don't want to tell you, I was simply asking your opinion. Well you're asking someone who doesn't believe the universe has an edge what I'd find if I travelled to the edge. I think it'd be more fruitful if you, presumably a person who believes the universe has an edge, can tell me how you think that whole scenario plays out. ok. so in my way of thinking. there was a bang, a bubble formed. expanded. our universe. go to the edge and look out. I believe you will see other universes. So despite believing that time was created by the Big Bang you're happy to imagine there were other universes BEFORE ours. Hmmm... no. the big bang was a flippant comment that ran away with itself. and the other universes don't have to be older. all part of some cycle. still getting to grips with it." My honest advice to you is to move your head over to thinking of the Big Bang as an event, much like a firework going off, that occurred within a volume of space-time. It pretty much solves everything you're struggling with there, its completely and utterly supported by all the science, and the only reason why you wouldn't want to make the switch is purely for theological reasons... which are never good reasons for any kind of science either for or against Once you're dealing with an infinite volume of space and time then basicaslly you can keep on travelling forever and you'll see all these lovely universes exploding into the night sky all around you. Besides, time, in the end, is really only a local thing. The Big Bang may have started our own clock running but there is no such thing as THE clock... its all soft and spongey... a bit like a lovely pair of boobs | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"George Gamow the Russian scientist who created Mr Tomkins said provided there was enough matter in the universe if you kept going out into space you would eventually arrive back where you started." That means there must be quite a network of service stations in the universe or you would run out of fuel and these weird coleslawy scotch egg things Ginsters make. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What is it?" Is it the gunge that collects in the cooker when you don't clean it? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Theoretical physics= all theory with a purposed formula but no actual evidence " Not true. A theory without any empirical data to back it up isn't really a theory at all in the world of science. The key thing to get your head round is that evidence isn't actually evidence for anything. We see what we see and then we try to fit our theories to what we see... that doesn't mean our theories are correct. But if they don't fit with what we see then they are almost certainly wrong... unless you tweak them a bit by introducing some new ad hoc theory about why things aren't matching up... which is what dark matter does for the Big Bang theory | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Theoretical physics= all theory with a purposed formula but no actual evidence " But if you're talking about multiverse theory and all that other pseudoscience... yeah you're right... absolutely no evidence for any of that stuff. Again, it was only really born out of an attempt to answer how the universe could have been made without a god... but it ends up exacerbating the problem rather than alleviating it | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The thing about time is, it needs somewhere to exist. So, let's say we go with Big Bang for a moment. If Big Bang did happen, then clearly there was nowhere prior to that- for time to exist. So I don't think time, or even maths is that important to the bigger metaphysical question of how our universe came into existence. Time supervenes on our universe, but it doesn't explain its origin . Same with maths, maths is just a form of formal logic . The highest form yeah, but it doesn't explain any reality as such, in that you can't use maths to explain why someone breathes . Or even if our universe is expanding. Maths just reflects the underlying reality- Doesn't go beyond that" Maybe our universe is in something? Maybe the Big Bang happened to our own universe but time was already in progress elsewhere. Who knows. It is all conjecture. Anyone who totally dismisses other stuff and claims to know the answer is a liar and a charlatan. Anyone who claims to believe a certain things because they understand it to be most likely may be wrong but at least they are not a liar. Anyone who says they are unsure and remains open minded is both right and telling the truth. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The reason for the conjecture of Dark Matter (DM) is that astrologers from Jan Oort on observed that galaxies, and particulalrly their extremities, spin at rates too fast to be held together by the observable matter. In other words: water going down a plug hole; that which is closest spins fastest, whereas the water towards the edge ebbs more slowly around the vortex. Assuming our metaphorical black hole is the plug hole, we would expect similar behaviour. The fact is that the outsides of galaxies spin *at the same fast* rate as the stars of the interior. So they should fly off. But they don't. Ergo, there is a presumed 2nd explanation - Dark Matter to account for the missing force that holds it all together. DM has not (yet) been detected. But this isn't the full picture..." This leads us to another observation of modern cosmology - that the universal expansion appears to be speeding up. To account for this, physicists have conjectured Dark Energy (DE), This is an unknown form of energy which is hypothesized to permeate all of space, tending to accelerate the expansion of the universe. DE is the most accepted hypothesis to explain the observations since the 1990s indicating that the universe is expanding at an accelerating rate. The best current measurements indicate that * dark energy contributes 68.3% of the total energy in the observable universe * the mass-energy of dark matter contribute 26.8% * and ordinary matter 4.9% | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The reason for the conjecture of Dark Matter (DM) is that astrologers from Jan Oort on observed that galaxies, and particulalrly their extremities, spin at rates too fast to be held together by the observable matter. In other words: water going down a plug hole; that which is closest spins fastest, whereas the water towards the edge ebbs more slowly around the vortex. Assuming our metaphorical black hole is the plug hole, we would expect similar behaviour. The fact is that the outsides of galaxies spin *at the same fast* rate as the stars of the interior. So they should fly off. But they don't. Ergo, there is a presumed 2nd explanation - Dark Matter to account for the missing force that holds it all together. DM has not (yet) been detected. But this isn't the full picture... This leads us to another observation of modern cosmology - that the universal expansion appears to be speeding up. To account for this, physicists have conjectured Dark Energy (DE), This is an unknown form of energy which is hypothesized to permeate all of space, tending to accelerate the expansion of the universe. DE is the most accepted hypothesis to explain the observations since the 1990s indicating that the universe is expanding at an accelerating rate. The best current measurements indicate that * dark energy contributes 68.3% of the total energy in the observable universe * the mass-energy of dark matter contribute 26.8% * and ordinary matter 4.9% " Ladies and gentlemen - the universe is missing. And 99% of it is made of stuff lighter than air. Fuckin' love this shit! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What is it?" The funkiest glue you could ever imagine whilst doped up with enough acid to drop a herd of african elephants.... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"And to top it all.. if we could scale up an Atom's nucleus to four inches the electron cloud would be four miles away with nothing but empty space in between. Iron, for example, is made up of 99.9999999999999% empty space. That's a whole lotta nothing " I was explaining that to my daughter the other day too | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's a sci-fi programme... Been watching it " We watch it also, good series. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's a sci-fi programme... Been watching it We watch it also, good series." the female captain 2, is hotttt...the android sucks though | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Theoretical physics= all theory with a purposed formula but no actual evidence But if you're talking about multiverse theory and all that other pseudoscience... yeah you're right... absolutely no evidence for any of that stuff. Again, it was only really born out of an attempt to answer how the universe could have been made without a god... but it ends up exacerbating the problem rather than alleviating it " No it wasn't lol As you like to express that you imagine a creator being exists I wonder how you rationalise it's effort creating malaria, TB, and hiv? What is the cosmos and it's investigation has zero to do with disproving the numerous god concepts, | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Theoretical physics= all theory with a purposed formula but no actual evidence But if you're talking about multiverse theory and all that other pseudoscience... yeah you're right... absolutely no evidence for any of that stuff. Again, it was only really born out of an attempt to answer how the universe could have been made without a god... but it ends up exacerbating the problem rather than alleviating it No it wasn't lol As you like to express that you imagine a creator being exists I wonder how you rationalise it's effort creating malaria, TB, and hiv? What is the cosmos and it's investigation has zero to do with disproving the numerous god concepts, " And off piste, so let's not confuse (dark) matters... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What is it? Its those Ribena stains which won't wash out of a white blouse You've hit on something there Josie...though my thoughts on dark matter being the hard substance in the loo after consuming a bottle of Aldi Red Wine blows all of the other theories above totally out of the water " I am going to stay off the Aldi Red from now on | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Theoretical physics= all theory with a purposed formula but no actual evidence But if you're talking about multiverse theory and all that other pseudoscience... yeah you're right... absolutely no evidence for any of that stuff. Again, it was only really born out of an attempt to answer how the universe could have been made without a god... but it ends up exacerbating the problem rather than alleviating it No it wasn't lol As you like to express that you imagine a creator being exists I wonder how you rationalise it's effort creating malaria, TB, and hiv? What is the cosmos and it's investigation has zero to do with disproving the numerous god concepts" To my knowledge, multiverse theory was proposed in response to things like the flatness problem, which give off the air of our universe being finely tuned for life. The best explanation they could come up with at the time was that it was probably one of zillions attempts at making a universe and thus happened by random chance i.e. their explanation was theologically motivated There is absolutely no evidence for a multiverse and no science to support it... so I can't see why else it was thought up. But maybe you can enlighten me | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Theoretical physics= all theory with a purposed formula but no actual evidence But if you're talking about multiverse theory and all that other pseudoscience... yeah you're right... absolutely no evidence for any of that stuff. Again, it was only really born out of an attempt to answer how the universe could have been made without a god... but it ends up exacerbating the problem rather than alleviating it No it wasn't lol As you like to express that you imagine a creator being exists I wonder how you rationalise it's effort creating malaria, TB, and hiv? What is the cosmos and it's investigation has zero to do with disproving the numerous god concepts To my knowledge, multiverse theory was proposed in response to things like the flatness problem, which give off the air of our universe being finely tuned for life. The best explanation they could come up with at the time was that it was probably one of zillions attempts at making a universe and thus happened by random chance i.e. their explanation was theologically motivated There is absolutely no evidence for a multiverse and no science to support it... so I can't see why else it was thought up. But maybe you can enlighten me " if I was thinking from an anthropic view..a multiverse exists on every thought.. plus i watched sliders and the one. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The thing about time is, it needs somewhere to exist. So, let's say we go with Big Bang for a moment. If Big Bang did happen, then clearly there was nowhere prior to that- for time to exist. So I don't think time, or even maths is that important to the bigger metaphysical question of how our universe came into existence. Time supervenes on our universe, but it doesn't explain its origin . Same with maths, maths is just a form of formal logic . The highest form yeah, but it doesn't explain any reality as such, in that you can't use maths to explain why someone breathes . Or even if our universe is expanding. Maths just reflects the underlying reality- Doesn't go beyond that Maybe our universe is in something? Maybe the Big Bang happened to our own universe but time was already in progress elsewhere. Who knows. It is all conjecture. Anyone who totally dismisses other stuff and claims to know the answer is a liar and a charlatan. Anyone who claims to believe a certain things because they understand it to be most likely may be wrong but at least they are not a liar. Anyone who says they are unsure and remains open minded is both right and telling the truth." Fair comment, and I'd agree you have to keep an open mind. Must admit I find the idea of multi universes hard to get my head round! But it's def logically possible , problem is you kind of get an infinite regress, or vicious circle. Ok so universe 1 and 2 etc, how did any of it come into being. Yeah it's a head fuck! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What is it?" Cern is looking in to this, check them out. Do some quantum physics reading for light entertainment | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Theoretical physics= all theory with a purposed formula but no actual evidence But if you're talking about multiverse theory and all that other pseudoscience... yeah you're right... absolutely no evidence for any of that stuff. Again, it was only really born out of an attempt to answer how the universe could have been made without a god... but it ends up exacerbating the problem rather than alleviating it No it wasn't lol As you like to express that you imagine a creator being exists I wonder how you rationalise it's effort creating malaria, TB, and hiv? What is the cosmos and it's investigation has zero to do with disproving the numerous god concepts To my knowledge, multiverse theory was proposed in response to things like the flatness problem, which give off the air of our universe being finely tuned for life. The best explanation they could come up with at the time was that it was probably one of zillions attempts at making a universe and thus happened by random chance i.e. their explanation was theologically motivated There is absolutely no evidence for a multiverse and no science to support it... so I can't see why else it was thought up. But maybe you can enlighten me " TB Multiverse theory can have a perfectly reasonable justification. It is merely an infinite extention of what our current limits of observations have given us ? Plausible yes ? Probable, I would not say so? For me a multiverse does NOT illustrate a creator being is none existent ! Randomness can sometimes be subjective my pi x Diesese and suffering are my reasons for not thinking any of the god concepts I've heard could be a way to the truth I don't think dark matter is stringy I do think the probability of it existing in some form, quite high | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |