FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Censorship and the arrogant patronising media twats.

Jump to newest
 

By *artytwo OP   Couple
over a year ago

Wolverhampton

Who the fuck makes these bizarre decisions in the media to pixelate/blur images on tv these days? Or bleep/obscure words?

We were watching 8 out of 10 cats does countdown, Sean Lock put on a 'nude suit' and they pixelated the groin??

The review says "Strong language, adult humour etc."

A few weeks ago a Peter Kay prerecorded live stand-up show was broadcast and most of his swearing was obscured by bizarre noises??

Watch a soap (if you have to) and frequently after the credits an announcement along the lines of 'If you have been affected by issues in this fantasy crap........ ring this number you sad sucker'

Who the fuck do these media people think they are?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondjoeMan
over a year ago

Glastonbury

And breathe!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"And breathe!"
Ha ha ha had too may blue smarties I think

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ngel n tedCouple
over a year ago

maidstone

The victorian era reaches long and deep unfortunately

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"reaches long and deep"

That's what she said

About censorship, I wholeheartedly f*****g agree.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It's not the nude suit groin that requires censorship. It's the dull witted, semi scripted, auto cue chimps. Otherwise known as tax payer funded entertainers or as I like to think of them, benefit scroungers.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *alandNitaCouple
over a year ago

Scunthorpe

I might be wrong (very rare though) but I believe that there's a panel of people who look at each program and make a decision based on the a whole number of criteria. Things like time and day of the week, is it the school holidays, are any of the stars involved in other things and what was on immediately before... These things will all impact how likely it is that the audience is younger than they would like and "need protecting".

For example. If you were to have someone like Daniel Radcliff or Emma Thompson on any program, then you'll guarantee that the program will become attractive to kids. Even if they don't stop up and watch it, they'll almost certainly get dad to record it for watching later ... or watch it on youtube in the morning.

Cal

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *alandNitaCouple
over a year ago

Scunthorpe


"It's not the nude suit groin that requires censorship. It's the dull witted, semi scripted, auto cue chimps. Otherwise known as tax payer funded entertainers or as I like to think of them, benefit scroungers. "

And I thought it was on ITV

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ophieslutTV/TS
over a year ago

Central

Blokes have been too harshly censored anyway. It's about time those of us who appreciate them are allowed to see the goods.

That Sean Lock cover up was ridiculous.

Get your kit off lads.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rank EinsteinMan
over a year ago

Burton upon stather


"I might be wrong (very rare though) but I believe that there's a panel of people who look at each program and make a decision based on the a whole number of criteria. Things like time and day of the week, is it the school holidays, are any of the stars involved in other things and what was on immediately before... These things will all impact how likely it is that the audience is younger than they would like and "need protecting".

For example. If you were to have someone like Daniel Radcliff or Emma Thompson on any program, then you'll guarantee that the program will become attractive to kids. Even if they don't stop up and watch it, they'll almost certainly get dad to record it for watching later ... or watch it on youtube in the morning.

Cal"

Very good point, especially when you take into account modern recording boxes being able to record programmes and people's refusal to parent their kids!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham


"It's not the nude suit groin that requires censorship. It's the dull witted, semi scripted, auto cue chimps. Otherwise known as tax payer funded entertainers or as I like to think of them, benefit scroungers.

And I thought it was on ITV "

Channel 4 actually lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Who the fuck makes these bizarre decisions in the media to pixelate/blur images on tv these days? Or bleep/obscure words?

We were watching 8 out of 10 cats does countdown, Sean Lock put on a 'nude suit' and they pixelated the groin??

The review says "Strong language, adult humour etc."

A few weeks ago a Peter Kay prerecorded live stand-up show was broadcast and most of his swearing was obscured by bizarre noises??

Watch a soap (if you have to) and frequently after the credits an announcement along the lines of 'If you have been affected by issues in this fantasy crap........ ring this number you sad sucker'

Who the fuck do these media people think they are?

"

its a proper gangster tool for the emperors of this world to be able to miniuplate the masses though mass media.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top