FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Yes/no swipe

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Do you think fab should have a swipe yes/no meet section for quicker interaction? Seems to work on many other sites and you can message the ones that say yes to you, if you don't like then just pass by

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

this aint Tinder mayne

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rcticFoxxxWoman
over a year ago

Hereabouts

No. Hours of flicking through pictures is the reason I don't use things like tinder. If fab did this, I'd leave and never ever come back.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

No,it's too much like a Facebook game for me. I'm not here for games or to meet people who make a decision in a split second of seeing a face.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Could have the option to opt in it like find by phone, so only those profiles were shown

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Do you think fab should have a swipe yes/no meet section for quicker interaction? Seems to work on many other sites and you can message the ones that say yes to you, if you don't like then just pass by"

Not like a wink then ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

No, as has been mentioned, that stuff is for tinder. Personally, I prefer fab as is

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Ooh is that how Tinder works? Never been anywhere near it but that could be hugely demoralising if Fab ever brought that in with my ugly mug. No, no, no, no, no, no .. etc before I even have a chance to start.

It's a thumbs down from me!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

As it's a swinging site and not everyone likes their faces on show I think only a few people and possibly mainly single people would want to be included. As stated above,there's already those kind of apps for single people.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I'm swiping left for "no" to this idea.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ophieslutTV/TS
over a year ago

Central

I don't think I like the idea. People complain a lot that their profiles aren't read, and I think this would increase that. Users would likely get an increase in inappropriate users messaging them.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I think it's a good idea to. straight to the point

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *irtyGirlWoman
over a year ago

Edinburgh

This would be useless for me. I'm interested in the person before the appearance.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

People on here tend to like others making an effort for them. Never used tinder but i can see how it's handy for people who just want a hassle free meet or easy way for them to find out who is interested in them. Might work for some users yeah.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

If you got to choose to be in it or not then surely would satisfy everyone

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eardsandboobsCouple
over a year ago

north of lincoln

We like the idea , we use a couple of swingers apps that do this but there aren't many users yet.

And for us as it's about the fun and sex and we do make decisions based on how the person looks before reading the profile.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

How do you put forward ideas?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 17/08/15 15:38:33]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"We like the idea , we use a couple of swingers apps that do this but there aren't many users yet.

And for us as it's about the fun and sex and we do make decisions based on how the person looks before reading the profile. "

That's the thing, most profiles say there has to be an attraction, so this would surely dirt that out and sort!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Nah, down think this would work here tbh

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 17/08/15 15:45:24]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Not sure it could work cos then you had to rebuild the whole site to make it interactive tho.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rightonsteveMan
over a year ago

Brighton - even Hove!

Nah, works fine as it is. I'd change the settings to be county based though, not regional.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Nah, works fine as it is. I'd change the settings to be county based though, not regional. "

That would've a good addition

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hattyman80Man
over a year ago

stockport

Swiping pics is possibly the worse idea I've heard suggested for fab. You might have missed the point of fab possibly

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

90% of what you'll see is dick pics or vag shots, so it'll predominantly be comparing them not the full package. I like the idea that you both have to like each other before you can message, however, my preferences in terms of what I like looking at online compared to who I like chatting to and getting it on with in person are worlds apart usually, so it's not a true representation

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eardsandboobsCouple
over a year ago

north of lincoln

Fab should keep this site but when iTunes allows it should create a tinder style swinging app to compliment it They would rake it in . As let's face it every dating app out there is sex based why not just have a sex app for all those pretending they want to date

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Don't know how it become an app though, but high risk

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Swiping pics is possibly the worse idea I've heard suggested for fab. You might have missed the point of fab possibly "

How has he missed the point? The main point of fab is to fuck people (to put it bluntly) so swiping for yes/no is a logical idea

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I don't think I like the idea. People complain a lot that their profiles aren't read, and I think this would increase that. Users would likely get an increase in inappropriate users messaging them. "

No they wouldn't - messages could only be sent if both people swipe yes so in fact there might even be less unsolicited messages

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Swiping pics is possibly the worse idea I've heard suggested for fab. You might have missed the point of fab possibly

How has he missed the point? The main point of fab is to fuck people (to put it bluntly) so swiping for yes/no is a logical idea "

Logical, but flawed, because not all humans are logical and swiping like at one moment, does not necessarily mean that the person will want to fuck the brains out of the other person at the same time they swipe back. So I disagree because people may be after fb fwb or partners on here, but not everyone, and that system is more for regular meets with the same people

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Swiping pics is possibly the worse idea I've heard suggested for fab. You might have missed the point of fab possibly

How has he missed the point? The main point of fab is to fuck people (to put it bluntly) so swiping for yes/no is a logical idea

Logical, but flawed, because not all humans are logical and swiping like at one moment, does not necessarily mean that the person will want to fuck the brains out of the other person at the same time they swipe back. So I disagree because people may be after fb fwb or partners on here, but not everyone, and that system is more for regular meets with the same people"

Your point is also logical sir

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iSTARessWoman
over a year ago

London

No, no and no. Deleted Tinder as soon as I found this place.

Wish the inbox was less tricky to navigate sometimes though

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Nah.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *harpDressed ManMan
over a year ago

Here occasionally, but mostly somewhere else

Picture of a woman's shoes, taken from her waist.

Swipe

Closeup of cleavage

Swipe

Repeat until nauseous

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Swiping pics is possibly the worse idea I've heard suggested for fab. You might have missed the point of fab possibly

How has he missed the point? The main point of fab is to fuck people (to put it bluntly) so swiping for yes/no is a logical idea

Logical, but flawed, because not all humans are logical and swiping like at one moment, does not necessarily mean that the person will want to fuck the brains out of the other person at the same time they swipe back. So I disagree because people may be after fb fwb or partners on here, but not everyone, and that system is more for regular meets with the same people

Your point is also logical sir"

This is why you'd have the option to use the facility

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Swiping pics is possibly the worse idea I've heard suggested for fab. You might have missed the point of fab possibly

How has he missed the point? The main point of fab is to fuck people (to put it bluntly) so swiping for yes/no is a logical idea

Logical, but flawed, because not all humans are logical and swiping like at one moment, does not necessarily mean that the person will want to fuck the brains out of the other person at the same time they swipe back. So I disagree because people may be after fb fwb or partners on here, but not everyone, and that system is more for regular meets with the same people

Your point is also logical sir

This is why you'd have the option to use the facility "

Ah, so less like tinder, more like badoo, which is (in my opinion) the crossover app between tinder and fab (but lacking a casual option in looking for and I prefer the meet option of fab anyway)

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Swiping pics is possibly the worse idea I've heard suggested for fab. You might have missed the point of fab possibly

How has he missed the point? The main point of fab is to fuck people (to put it bluntly) so swiping for yes/no is a logical idea

Logical, but flawed, because not all humans are logical and swiping like at one moment, does not necessarily mean that the person will want to fuck the brains out of the other person at the same time they swipe back. So I disagree because people may be after fb fwb or partners on here, but not everyone, and that system is more for regular meets with the same people

Your point is also logical sir

This is why you'd have the option to use the facility

Ah, so less like tinder, more like badoo, which is (in my opinion) the crossover app between tinder and fab (but lacking a casual option in looking for and I prefer the meet option of fab anyway)"

Pretty much, badoo like many others used to be a lot better than it is now. All the clearly fake profiles are just laughable these days, I mean, I live near Leeds and I know there is no beach or palm trees!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hole Lotta RosieWoman
over a year ago

Deviant City

Keep fab as it is

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Swiping pics is possibly the worse idea I've heard suggested for fab. You might have missed the point of fab possibly

How has he missed the point? The main point of fab is to fuck people (to put it bluntly) so swiping for yes/no is a logical idea

Logical, but flawed, because not all humans are logical and swiping like at one moment, does not necessarily mean that the person will want to fuck the brains out of the other person at the same time they swipe back. So I disagree because people may be after fb fwb or partners on here, but not everyone, and that system is more for regular meets with the same people

Your point is also logical sir

This is why you'd have the option to use the facility

Ah, so less like tinder, more like badoo, which is (in my opinion) the crossover app between tinder and fab (but lacking a casual option in looking for and I prefer the meet option of fab anyway)

Pretty much, badoo like many others used to be a lot better than it is now. All the clearly fake profiles are just laughable these days, I mean, I live near Leeds and I know there is no beach or palm trees!! "

Really? But Leeds is such a tropical city. Surely the swallows got the coconuts from there

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

East Sussex


"Could have the option to opt in it like find by phone, so only those profiles were shown "

Sounds like a good idea if you could opt in. I wouldn't personally but I think its a good idea for sites like this to remain current and attractive to a good mix of people.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top