Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm single with no desire to be in a relationship. It's not exactly an unusual situation for women now. Many women even decide to have kids and bring them up alone, through choice. How does that fit with your query" Well it doesn't fit in with the query at all if you have no desire to be in a relationship. It takes you out of the selection making process surely? My mum brought her kids up on her own so I understand women don't need a man to be a provider | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I am wondering if the majority of women still select for male partners that can act as a provider? Its a completely outdated and sexist viewpoint now surely?" A provider of what ? It is a fallacy to think that there ever was a period in history where men provided EVERYTHING and women just picked their teeth and farted. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think it's only natural that a woman should want a partner who can provide the best he can for her, especially if children are brought into the equation. With state handouts and benefits these days though, it isn't always necessary. " State handouts are not that great, get real, my mum brought 4 kids up alone and worked full time | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm single with no desire to be in a relationship. It's not exactly an unusual situation for women now. Many women even decide to have kids and bring them up alone, through choice. How does that fit with your query Well it doesn't fit in with the query at all if you have no desire to be in a relationship. It takes you out of the selection making process surely? My mum brought her kids up on her own so I understand women don't need a man to be a provider " I've selected. I selected for not needing a man who can provide, or a man at all. If someone I like comes along then great, but I'm generally quite happy being single. I've had two long-term relationships but being single seems to suit me better. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think it's only natural that a woman should want a partner who can provide the best he can for her, especially if children are brought into the equation. With state handouts and benefits these days though, it isn't always necessary. State handouts are not that great, get real, my mum brought 4 kids up alone and worked full time " That was 40 years ago things changed since then. The fact that people complained the benufits cap, which is equivilent to a wage of £35,000 a year, was going to force people into poverty kind of suggests how wild benifit spending was getting. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think it's only natural that a woman should want a partner who can provide the best he can for her, especially if children are brought into the equation. With state handouts and benefits these days though, it isn't always necessary. State handouts are not that great, get real, my mum brought 4 kids up alone and worked full time " I never said that anyone on benefits was well off, just that they are provided for in that they have a roof over their head and enough money to feed & clothe themselves and pay utility bills | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I guess what I was getting at is that it appears that a lot of women (NOT ALL) are still swayed by successful men. I'm not talking about guys with penis extension sports cars and flash money around just average successful men. I got to thinking about this as I was watching a youtube video about how women have the same employment opportunities as men these days (many more in STEM subjects) and so my thinking is that the ones that still go for the more successful guys basically want to have their cake and eat it. Am I making sense? I'm wondering if the age old impulses for male selection based on status has changed at all given the evolution of gender roles in society. " You're right but it's not something people want to admit to, maybe they aren't even consciously doing it. But one example is that in online dating research mens incomes correlate nicely with profile interest as do women's attractiveness. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"My husband 'provides' money by working but I 'provide' childcare for our family. I'm assuming money is what you were referring to? Not the nurturing of a human being, that's lower on the list right? " Far more important, but is undervalued by society, some men seem to like being househusbands these days too and if the wife can earn more then why not | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The difference in unemployment rates between men and women would suggest so :p" Well when You start having the babies and We get Equal wages, I will be only too happy to swap. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Perhaps they want a man that will provide for them if they needed it rather than a useless waste of space that they have to support. I maybe old fashioned but I still believe it is my duty to look after my family, but would never stop Mrs R from working or contributing what she wants to. Still open doors and walk on the outside of pavements for her to, oh and carry shopping for her " There is some gender bias in how you have worded your comment. A 'man' that will provide for them if they needed it... a 'useless waste of space' that they have to support. So its ok for women to need to be provided for by a 'man' but if a man needs to be provided for then he is a 'useless waste of space'? Of course you believe it's your duty to look after your family.Every man and woman with a family should and I'm sure does believe that. As for opening doors and carrying shopping...well thats just gentlemanly and nice | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I am wondering if the majority of women still select for male partners that can act as a provider? Its a completely outdated and sexist viewpoint now surely?" Financial Provision ? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I guess what I was getting at is that it appears that a lot of women (NOT ALL) are still swayed by successful men. I'm not talking about guys with penis extension sports cars and flash money around just average successful men. I got to thinking about this as I was watching a youtube video about how women have the same employment opportunities as men these days (many more in STEM subjects) and so my thinking is that the ones that still go for the more successful guys basically want to have their cake and eat it. Am I making sense? I'm wondering if the age old impulses for male selection based on status has changed at all given the evolution of gender roles in society. " I think successful people are attracted to other successful people, as they possibly share the same wavelength and outlook on life. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I guess what I was getting at is that it appears that a lot of women (NOT ALL) are still swayed by successful men. I'm not talking about guys with penis extension sports cars and flash money around just average successful men. I got to thinking about this as I was watching a youtube video about how women have the same employment opportunities as men these days (many more in STEM subjects) and so my thinking is that the ones that still go for the more successful guys basically want to have their cake and eat it. Am I making sense? I'm wondering if the age old impulses for male selection based on status has changed at all given the evolution of gender roles in society. " Have their cake and eat it? You're not really suggesting that if a woman is (financially) successful she shouldn't be allowed a (financially) successful partner too?! Ever considered that some (financially) successful people may have particular traits that attract them to one another and it's nothing to do with income? I'm actually finding the implications of what you're saying somewhat distasteful. The apparent suggestion that a "successful" woman wanting a "successful" husband is wanting to "have her cake and eat it" is your gender issue and not ours. Are you perhaps suggesting that all these "successful" women have a duty to marry less "successful" men and support them, since they're already doing quite all right for themselves? This sounds like bitterness of a less "successful" man that the "successful" men are more desired than him. Beautiful women do better than average looking women too, because men often prefer beautiful wives. That's just how life is. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You're right but it's not something people want to admit to, maybe they aren't even consciously doing it. But one example is that in online dating research mens incomes correlate nicely with profile interest as do women's attractiveness. " I do think most of it is done unconsciously. It's kinda hardwired into all female animals to select for higher staus males. But I think as humans with a much higher self-awareness that we can and should challenge our self-imposed gender stereotypes. During my degree my favourite subjects were evolution and animal behaviour so I'm genuinely interested in this but worried I may come across as chauvanistic. Trying to pick my words carefully | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I am wondering if the majority of women still select for male partners that can act as a provider? Its a completely outdated and sexist viewpoint now surely? Financial Provision ?" I regret the wording of the title and OP now. I should have based it on status rather than provision. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You're right but it's not something people want to admit to, maybe they aren't even consciously doing it. But one example is that in online dating research mens incomes correlate nicely with profile interest as do women's attractiveness. I do think most of it is done unconsciously. It's kinda hardwired into all female animals to select for higher staus males. But I think as humans with a much higher self-awareness that we can and should challenge our self-imposed gender stereotypes. During my degree my favourite subjects were evolution and animal behaviour so I'm genuinely interested in this but worried I may come across as chauvanistic. Trying to pick my words carefully " You seem to think it's only women that have hard-wiring to select for certain traits. It's certainly only women you're criticising for it. What exactly is it you want these women who want to "have their cake and eat it" to do? Why is it even your business if that is what they want? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I guess what I was getting at is that it appears that a lot of women (NOT ALL) are still swayed by successful men. I'm not talking about guys with penis extension sports cars and flash money around just average successful men. I got to thinking about this as I was watching a youtube video about how women have the same employment opportunities as men these days (many more in STEM subjects) and so my thinking is that the ones that still go for the more successful guys basically want to have their cake and eat it. Am I making sense? I'm wondering if the age old impulses for male selection based on status has changed at all given the evolution of gender roles in society. Have their cake and eat it? You're not really suggesting that if a woman is (financially) successful she shouldn't be allowed a (financially) successful partner too?! Beautiful women do better than average looking women too, because men often prefer beautiful wives. That's just how life is." No I'm not suggesting that successful women shouldn't be allowed a successful partner. That would be ridiculous. You are right about men selecting for beauty. Although I see that as an innate weakness as it has no bearing on the person. At least I can admit my guilt in that matter | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I would happily be a house husband,staying at home doing all the domestic shit,as my good lady worries about the financial side of things.i hate going to the office everyday.I'd much rather clean,cook,garden,and look after the kids." I think househusband would be my dream job as well | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You seem to think it's only women that have hard-wiring to select for certain traits. It's certainly only women you're criticising for it. What exactly is it you want these women who want to "have their cake and eat it" to do? Why is it even your business if that is what they want?" No men are also hardwired to select for certain traits (beauty) and should and do face criticism for it. I don't want those women to do anything. It's none of my business just something that interests me on an academic level. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I provide for myself. I wouldn't go looking for a rich bloke to provide for me but equally I wouldn't be that fussed about going out with someone who's unemployed either. I have my own money and I'm independent and if I got myself into a relationship I would at least want my partner to be on equal footing. " Thats the honest and open kind of comment I had hoped to hear | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This is an odd one. No - is the resounding and obvious answer. And yet. Looking at my situation, I pay the mortgage and all the bills excluding TV and (most) weekly shopping. I do most of the house work, the vast majority of the cooking and I look after our daughter for more hours than anyone else. Square that. " Or maybe I had feminism/equality beaten in to me by my mother... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Or maybe I had feminism/equality beaten in to me by my mother..." I can relate to that It's important to realise though that feminism and equality are very different things in modern society. Modern feminism is basically just misandry and mostly frowned upon. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Or maybe I had feminism/equality beaten in to me by my mother... I can relate to that It's important to realise though that feminism and equality are very different things in modern society. Modern feminism is basically just misandry and mostly frowned upon." Oh, I'm not complaining in the slightest - in fact I think elusive 'equality' is NOT enough. Not for women, not for BME people, not for gay rights... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Self sufficiency is a must. " And again, something the desert taught me... You can survive on your own But to thrive requires co-operation | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I am wondering if the majority of women still select for male partners that can act as a provider? Its a completely outdated and sexist viewpoint now surely?" I wish. I've always been the provider in my relationships. I'd like one which is equal at the very least! Although being a little spoilt would be nice for a change if i'm honest! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We're still hard wired genetically that the men who are stronger go out and hunt mammoths and the women stay in the cave and look after the children. It was like that for thousands of years - a couple of decades of rehashing the position isn't going to change things. " Tru Dat. But evolution also produces variation and no doubt some women today would be happy and able to go hunt a mammoth. Some just seem to forget that they don't represent the majority of the population and have a tendency to look down upon women who get a lot of satisfaction and pride from being a home maker. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" I got to thinking about this as I was watching a youtube video about how women have the same employment opportunities as men these days (many more in STEM subjects " I must say how much I loath the kind of people that say "how can we get more women into STEM subjects?" Which assumes on behalf of other women that they would want to get into STEM. Interestingly the same people never seem too interested in answering "how can we get more men to be primary school teachers?" - which casts considerable doubt whether gender equality is their real motivation... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What's funny is most Stem industries are crying our for women. Ours has a standing target of 25% of each years recruitment should be women and they push hard for it and the women who do get taken on get all the good perks during training (trips and diners out etc) Last year's round they managed 1.... not 1% one woman lol. It's not that there art places for women it's just it seems most women do not want to work in engineering or heavy industry. " Just like the average man seems less inclined to be a primary school teacher than the average woman. Could it be human nature... no it must be a conspiracy (even though girls are systematically outperforming boys at schools and therefore have even better grades to access and study STEM subjects at university - IF they wanted to) | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What's funny is most Stem industries are crying our for women. Ours has a standing target of 25% of each years recruitment should be women and they push hard for it and the women who do get taken on get all the good perks during training (trips and diners out etc) Last year's round they managed 1.... not 1% one woman lol. It's not that there art places for women it's just it seems most women do not want to work in engineering or heavy industry. Just like the average man seems less inclined to be a primary school teacher than the average woman. Could it be human nature... no it must be a conspiracy (even though girls are systematically outperforming boys at schools and therefore have even better grades to access and study STEM subjects at university - IF they wanted to) " The brackets bit is only since the shift from exams to coursework. Boys are proven to do much worse in coursework than girls. Also I never got how coursework was a good measure of retained knowledge when most of the parents I know do their children's course work for them :/ Males face quite a lot of problems if they want to do anything in clip care there's always the suspicion they are only doing it cause they're dirty dirty peados2 amongst some | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sorry. Im old school. When children are involved, one partner to be bread winner whilst the other is the home maker. Sorry to be old fashioned but two different roles need two different providers. And how single parents manage i just do not know" 30 hours a week free child care starts next year under the tories plans. That's nearly a full working week of cover | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nope. Have no desire for any man or woman to provide for me. Ever." Well except the sugar daddy you had who paid for you through your studies? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nope. Have no desire for any man or woman to provide for me. Ever. Well except the sugar daddy you had who paid for you through your studies? " Yup. That was quite nice. He did buy me lots of books. I don't have that relationship anymore - but thanks for your concern for my moral compass. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What's funny is most Stem industries are crying our for women. Ours has a standing target of 25% of each years recruitment should be women and they push hard for it and the women who do get taken on get all the good perks during training (trips and diners out etc) Last year's round they managed 1.... not 1% one woman lol. It's not that there art places for women it's just it seems most women do not want to work in engineering or heavy industry. Just like the average man seems less inclined to be a primary school teacher than the average woman. Could it be human nature... no it must be a conspiracy (even though girls are systematically outperforming boys at schools and therefore have even better grades to access and study STEM subjects at university - IF they wanted to) The brackets bit is only since the shift from exams to coursework. Boys are proven to do much worse in coursework than girls. Also I never got how coursework was a good measure of retained knowledge when most of the parents I know do their children's course work for them :/ Males face quite a lot of problems if they want to do anything in clip care there's always the suspicion they are only doing it cause they're dirty dirty peados2 amongst some " Fair point but I'd say coursework was more representative of the skills most jobs use compared to exams. Especially in STEM. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sorry. Im old school. When children are involved, one partner to be bread winner whilst the other is the home maker. Sorry to be old fashioned but two different roles need two different providers. And how single parents manage i just do not know" Not sure i agree, we brought our kids up together as a 'partnership'.. when i was not on duty i would when Lynn was on duty do the domestic things which i have always done.. the days of the 1950's 'good little woman' are long gone and in the current climate whereby both partners more likely have to 'provide' financially its got to better for a dads relationship with his kids .. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nope. Have no desire for any man or woman to provide for me. Ever. Well except the sugar daddy you had who paid for you through your studies? " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I provide for myself. I wouldn't go looking for a rich bloke to provide for me but equally I wouldn't be that fussed about going out with someone who's unemployed either. I have my own money and I'm independent and if I got myself into a relationship I would at least want my partner to be on equal footing. " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It depends on what you consider to be 'provider'. Certainly look at old famous men, with money and status, they never go short on attention from much younger and comparatively more attractive women. Look at the WAG culture too. A lot of those sportsmen would be on FAB if they weren't famous and/or had money." Nobody every says that about nobody guys who date successful women though - do they? Are they not hunting the cash too? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It depends on what you consider to be 'provider'. Certainly look at old famous men, with money and status, they never go short on attention from much younger and comparatively more attractive women. Look at the WAG culture too. A lot of those sportsmen would be on FAB if they weren't famous and/or had money. Nobody every says that about nobody guys who date successful women though - do they? Are they not hunting the cash too?" The OP was about men as providers, that's what I was discussing. But yes men are fortune hunters too. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What's funny is most Stem industries are crying our for women. Ours has a standing target of 25% of each years recruitment should be women and they push hard for it and the women who do get taken on get all the good perks during training (trips and diners out etc) Last year's round they managed 1.... not 1% one woman lol. It's not that there art places for women it's just it seems most women do not want to work in engineering or heavy industry. " That was the exact argument put forward in the Youtube vid I watched. It seems as if less suitable women often get picked ahead of more qualified men in order to meet this ridiculous quota when there aren't enough women interested in pursuing those careers. As long as equality is enforced there shouldn't be the need for quotas. This is getting off-topic though | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why aren't women interested in STEM careers ?" Too busy thinking about shoes I imagine. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why aren't women interested in STEM careers ? Too busy thinking about shoes I imagine." and lipstick , don't forget lippy! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why aren't women interested in STEM careers ?" Another big problem is keeping women in STEM jobs once they're on the ladder. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why aren't women interested in STEM careers ?" I think its just down to different interests and motivations. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why aren't women interested in STEM careers ? Too busy thinking about shoes I imagine. and lipstick , don't forget lippy!" I think you'll find they're far too busy thinking about babies. Actually. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why aren't women interested in STEM careers ? I think its just down to different interests and motivations. " and biases | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why aren't women interested in STEM careers ? I think its just down to different interests and motivations. and biases" And guidance at 13. (sorry, I read the OP and the last post). | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why aren't women interested in STEM careers ? I think its just down to different interests and motivations. and biases And guidance at 13. (sorry, I read the OP and the last post)." Well if you're ever feeling hysterical and need calming dear; read the rest. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why aren't women interested in STEM careers ? I think its just down to different interests and motivations. and biases And guidance at 13. (sorry, I read the OP and the last post)." Got to agree with this. Too many companies have quotas, but spend most of their time ignoring girls at the very age they could be influencing them. I did aim for a career in engineering, but my maths skills weren't up to snuff. Happy now in my current job, which luckily has no glass ceiling. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why aren't women interested in STEM careers ? I think its just down to different interests and motivations. and biases And guidance at 13. (sorry, I read the OP and the last post). Well if you're ever feeling hysterical and need calming dear; read the rest." It's no longer possible for me to get hysterical - I had a hysterectomy. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why aren't women interested in STEM careers ?" Not sure, why aren't men interested in being primary school teachers? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why aren't women interested in STEM careers ? Not sure, why aren't men interested in being primary school teachers? " . Five year olds drive you insane Just look at any primary school teacher | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I just kill a woolly mammoth. Meet me in cave, women. I have big meat. " Form an orderly queue ladies! BEHIND me! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why aren't women interested in STEM careers ? Not sure, why aren't men interested in being primary school teachers? . Five year olds drive you insane Just look at any primary school teacher" To be honest, if I was to be a teacher I'd rather teach primary school or university (i.e not that horrible teen phase) - funilly enough there's a programme on BBC about some Chinese teachers coming to British schools and generally be unable to understand why the children are so I'll disciplined - caused quite a lot of discussion in our household! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I just kill a woolly mammoth. Meet me in cave, women. I have big meat. Form an orderly queue ladies! BEHIND me! " He's just after someone to cook it for him. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I just kill a woolly mammoth. Meet me in cave, women. I have big meat. Form an orderly queue ladies! BEHIND me! He's just after someone to cook it for him." pmsl | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |