Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to The Lounge |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think the problem is that it's a regular question of yours. Your user name clearer states that you believe your brain is sexy (and in your photos that it's located in your cock). It's Friday night, at the start of the school holidays and there are fewer people around. Bumping after 40 minutes also smacks of desperation to have your conversation. I hope that by responding I have given you whatever social interaction hit you were looking for. " Whilst you're not as directly confrontational as some Lickety, you seem to have a distinctly negative _iew of so much of what I post? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I look for the full package here AND in the real world! Attractive face - good body. - great, fun personality - and intelligence! Sadly, without all four I can't have great sex - it's a bugger!! "I'm glad I made the cut! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think the problem is that it's a regular question of yours. Your user name clearer states that you believe your brain is sexy (and in your photos that it's located in your cock). It's Friday night, at the start of the school holidays and there are fewer people around. Bumping after 40 minutes also smacks of desperation to have your conversation. I hope that by responding I have given you whatever social interaction hit you were looking for. Whilst you're not as directly confrontational as some Lickety, you seem to have a distinctly negative _iew of so much of what I post?" My negativity is with the frequency of the same questions dressed up in a number of different formats. I responded to this only because you bumped it, and so soon after posting it. When you make interesting points I respond to those with interest. This, to me, reads another of your threads about how attractive you think your brain is and that is what you are told by the many women who meet you. I am a sapiosexual/a sapiophile. The mind is the most erogenous of organs. Men have to interest my mind (except in clubs) before I meet them. The age of the person and my age is irrelevant to that (my criterion on age is about not meeting anyone I could reasonably have birthed). You're self-confessed, possibly even this evening, as not being great face to face and finding sites like this give you a chance to shine by using your brain and wooing that way. I truly hope that is working for you. I think you could probably use that brain and wit, if that is there, to explore different subjects and post about other things than your angst with women and the sexiness of your brain. Does that help answer your question? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm attracted to men who have no idea how good looking they are & how funny & intelligent they are. Arrogance is a complete turn off for me." Yes, I agree with this. I met a guy on Wednesday who was the most attractive man (both looks and personality wise) I have ever met, and he had no idea. I couldn't see him constantly asking women whether he was sexy because of his brain or his mahoosive cock.  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm attracted to men who have no idea how good looking they are & how funny & intelligent they are. Arrogance is a complete turn off for me. Yes, I agree with this. I met a guy on Wednesday who was the most attractive man (both looks and personality wise) I have ever met, and he had no idea. I couldn't see him constantly asking women whether he was sexy because of his brain or his mahoosive cock. "Sounds like a decent guy  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm attracted to men who have no idea how good looking they are & how funny & intelligent they are. Arrogance is a complete turn off for me. Yes, I agree with this. I met a guy on Wednesday who was the most attractive man (both looks and personality wise) I have ever met, and he had no idea. I couldn't see him constantly asking women whether he was sexy because of his brain or his mahoosive cock. "How spooky!! So did I 
He had no idea just how good looking he was & he was just as lovely on the inside too.
A breath of fresh air  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think the problem is that it's a regular question of yours. Your user name clearer states that you believe your brain is sexy (and in your photos that it's located in your cock). It's Friday night, at the start of the school holidays and there are fewer people around. Bumping after 40 minutes also smacks of desperation to have your conversation. I hope that by responding I have given you whatever social interaction hit you were looking for. Whilst you're not as directly confrontational as some Lickety, you seem to have a distinctly negative _iew of so much of what I post? My negativity is with the frequency of the same questions dressed up in a number of different formats." And this affects you negatively because...? There was no attack on anyone on this thread, certainly not yourself, there was no reason for you to respond with your criticism. "This, to me, reads another of your threads about how attractive you think your brain is and that is what you are told by the many women who meet you...You're self-confessed, possibly even this evening, as not being great face to face and finding sites like this give you a chance to shine by using your brain and wooing that way." And as I've said to a number of others, I'm a single male, on a site filled with thousands upon thousands of them - I HAVE to stand out, and I do this by highlighting what I feel are my most attractive qualities, sorry if you find this irksome but unfortunately this is the way of the site. I would LOVE if single males were in sufficient demand that I didn't have to use the forums in the way I do, as I'd much rather be chatting with people I like in PM and possibly looking at meeting rather than trying to come up with more inventive ways to advertise on the forum, but sadly single males aren't in demand, and have to work hard to change that - a little more understanding of that fact wouldn't go amiss. With regards to your 'not being great face to face' remark, like so many others you have misquoted me - which isn't a mistake you should be making if you observe patterns in my posting as frequently as you claim. I've stated before that I find it difficult to cross the threshold of unfamiliarity with people, making initial contact, either on here or in the real world, is something I struggle with - once I'm actually given the chance to properly engage with someone socially, I find it quite easy. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Intelligence, like looks, is subjective. " ...is it?  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm attracted to men who have no idea how good looking they are & how funny & intelligent they are. Arrogance is a complete turn off for me. Yes, I agree with this. I met a guy on Wednesday who was the most attractive man (both looks and personality wise) I have ever met, and he had no idea. I couldn't see him constantly asking women whether he was sexy because of his brain or his mahoosive cock.
How spooky!! So did I
He had no idea just how good looking he was & he was just as lovely on the inside too.
A breath of fresh air "Modesty can be attractive on here, especially when we're surrounded by profiles full of cock pics and sky remotes. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm attracted to men who have no idea how good looking they are & how funny & intelligent they are. Arrogance is a complete turn off for me. Yes, I agree with this. I met a guy on Wednesday who was the most attractive man (both looks and personality wise) I have ever met, and he had no idea. I couldn't see him constantly asking women whether he was sexy because of his brain or his mahoosive cock.
How spooky!! So did I
He had no idea just how good looking he was & he was just as lovely on the inside too.
A breath of fresh air
Modesty can be attractive on here, especially when we're surrounded by profiles full of cock pics and sky remotes."I haven't even seen this guy's cock | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Intelligence, like looks, is subjective. ...is it? "Sure it is. All attraction is subjective. Being attracted to a mind is exactly the same as being attracted to a body - we have to find the things we, personally, enjoy. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Intelligence, like looks, is subjective. ...is it?
Sure it is. All attraction is subjective. Being attracted to a mind is exactly the same as being attracted to a body - we have to find the things we, personally, enjoy."You can be attracted to different personality traits but that's not the same as intelligence. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Intelligence, like looks, is subjective. ...is it?
Sure it is. All attraction is subjective. Being attracted to a mind is exactly the same as being attracted to a body - we have to find the things we, personally, enjoy.
You can be attracted to different personality traits but that's not the same as intelligence."Fair enough, intelligence is not a personality trait per se, but there are different types, and I would find some more attractive than others. Like cock size, arm size, and looks, its just one of those things that is perceived subjectively by the intended, as part of the whole package. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Geek intelligence or street wise " Define the difference? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think the problem is that it's a regular question of yours. Your user name clearer states that you believe your brain is sexy (and in your photos that it's located in your cock). It's Friday night, at the start of the school holidays and there are fewer people around. Bumping after 40 minutes also smacks of desperation to have your conversation. I hope that by responding I have given you whatever social interaction hit you were looking for. Whilst you're not as directly confrontational as some Lickety, you seem to have a distinctly negative _iew of so much of what I post? My negativity is with the frequency of the same questions dressed up in a number of different formats. And this affects you negatively because...? There was no attack on anyone on this thread, certainly not yourself, there was no reason for you to respond with your criticism. This, to me, reads another of your threads about how attractive you think your brain is and that is what you are told by the many women who meet you...You're self-confessed, possibly even this evening, as not being great face to face and finding sites like this give you a chance to shine by using your brain and wooing that way. And as I've said to a number of others, I'm a single male, on a site filled with thousands upon thousands of them - I HAVE to stand out, and I do this by highlighting what I feel are my most attractive qualities, sorry if you find this irksome but unfortunately this is the way of the site. I would LOVE if single males were in sufficient demand that I didn't have to use the forums in the way I do, as I'd much rather be chatting with people I like in PM and possibly looking at meeting rather than trying to come up with more inventive ways to advertise on the forum, but sadly single males aren't in demand, and have to work hard to change that - a little more understanding of that fact wouldn't go amiss. With regards to your 'not being great face to face' remark, like so many others you have misquoted me - which isn't a mistake you should be making if you observe patterns in my posting as frequently as you claim. I've stated before that I find it difficult to cross the threshold of unfamiliarity with people, making initial contact, either on here or in the real world, is something I struggle with - once I'm actually given the chance to properly engage with someone socially, I find it quite easy." You know that when you post on an open forum you open yourself up for praise, criticism, hijacking and anything inbetween. I have told you why I posted as I did. Frankly, as with every other time you feel the need to state that only an exact quote is used about you, I can't be arsed. I am merely giving a flavour of what I have read and understood of what you have written, not just in one posting but across a range of posts on a range of threads. Just as you have formed a picture of me and will interpret what I write in your own way I will have done the same about you. We've already had that discussion on another thread in the past. Should I be looking it up to ensure I quote it exactly? As to you standing out on the forum, to quote you loosely (and not exactly as I can't be arsed to find the thread(s) on that) you have previously stated that the fora has no women that would interest you, based on our various failings. The fora attract a tiny minority of Fab users so you are putting a lot of effort into making yourself shine to an even smaller number of women who might interest you once you take out all us old, fat and frankly uppity women. Everything gets repeated on the fora, my point was simply that you repeat yourself. The Last Leg is starting now so I'm off to drool at the really sexy brain that is Adam Hills. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The Last Leg is starting now so I'm off to drool at the really sexy brain that is Adam Hills. " Woah thanks for the reminder! Adam Hill.......  Now there's an example of how well intelligence mixes with humour. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Geek intelligence or street wise Define the difference?" Some people are attracted to a intelligent scientist/businessman type Some go for the Bank robber/millionaire drug dealer type, Both can be classed as intelligent they just use their brains for different purposes | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think the problem is that it's a regular question of yours. Your user name clearer states that you believe your brain is sexy (and in your photos that it's located in your cock). It's Friday night, at the start of the school holidays and there are fewer people around. Bumping after 40 minutes also smacks of desperation to have your conversation. I hope that by responding I have given you whatever social interaction hit you were looking for. Whilst you're not as directly confrontational as some Lickety, you seem to have a distinctly negative _iew of so much of what I post? My negativity is with the frequency of the same questions dressed up in a number of different formats. And this affects you negatively because...? There was no attack on anyone on this thread, certainly not yourself, there was no reason for you to respond with your criticism. This, to me, reads another of your threads about how attractive you think your brain is and that is what you are told by the many women who meet you...You're self-confessed, possibly even this evening, as not being great face to face and finding sites like this give you a chance to shine by using your brain and wooing that way. And as I've said to a number of others, I'm a single male, on a site filled with thousands upon thousands of them - I HAVE to stand out, and I do this by highlighting what I feel are my most attractive qualities, sorry if you find this irksome but unfortunately this is the way of the site. I would LOVE if single males were in sufficient demand that I didn't have to use the forums in the way I do, as I'd much rather be chatting with people I like in PM and possibly looking at meeting rather than trying to come up with more inventive ways to advertise on the forum, but sadly single males aren't in demand, and have to work hard to change that - a little more understanding of that fact wouldn't go amiss. With regards to your 'not being great face to face' remark, like so many others you have misquoted me - which isn't a mistake you should be making if you observe patterns in my posting as frequently as you claim. I've stated before that I find it difficult to cross the threshold of unfamiliarity with people, making initial contact, either on here or in the real world, is something I struggle with - once I'm actually given the chance to properly engage with someone socially, I find it quite easy. You know that when you post on an open forum you open yourself up for praise, criticism, hijacking and anything inbetween." Indeed, but that doesn't mean that you HAVE to engage in any of the more negative among those practices, least of all when there was nothing in this particular thread which justifiably warranted any. "I have told you why I posted as I did. Frankly, as with every other time you feel the need to state that only an exact quote is used about you, I can't be arsed." The exactness word for word isn't as important as the meaning, when someone quotes or references what I've supposedly said, then offers their misinterpretation of it, don't complain when I correct you - I don't like being misrepresented. "As to you standing out on the forum, to quote you loosely (and not exactly as I can't be arsed to find the thread(s) on that) you have previously stated that the fora has no women that would interest you, based on our various failings...us old, fat and frankly uppity women." ...case in point, indeed I have been honest about the fact that few women on the forums interest me, however, that was about as descriptive as I got, YOU have chosen to interpret this in a blatantly offensive fashion, hence why I feel the need to respond - misrepresentation again. " The fora attract a tiny minority of Fab users so you are putting a lot of effort into making yourself shine to an even smaller number of women" And yet one of the go to arguments (not necessarily yours) that is so often rolled out in defence of the forums is that many people read them but don't post, and I receive a fair amount of my PMs from such people. This is why I use the forums as much as I do. "Everything gets repeated on the fora, my point was simply that you repeat yourself." And I will most likely do so again. I don't actually dislike you lickety, but sometimes I get frustrated with the frequency of which you pull me up on such silly little things. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No it doesn't increase with age. I don't suffer fools gladly and never have. I don't like guys who think I should bow down to how intelligent/good looking/generally amazing they are/always looking for reaffirmation. In fact that applies to all people. Not just men. I prefer more spontaneous, laid back type of guys with a sense if humour that don't over think and analyse everything. Mindset wins over mind any day." Nice Arse
Sorry what was you saying ? 
Gimp | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No it doesn't increase with age. I don't suffer fools gladly and never have. I don't like guys who think I should bow down to how intelligent/good looking/generally amazing they are/always looking for reaffirmation. In fact that applies to all people. Not just men. I prefer more spontaneous, laid back type of guys with a sense if humour that don't over think and analyse everything. Mindset wins over mind any day. Nice Arse
Sorry what was you saying ?
Gimp" | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Does it increase with age? I ask because over the years, I've found I tend to attract women older than myself more so than any other age group, I've actually had sex with comparatively few girls my own age or younger by comparison. I consider my mind to be my most distinguishing factor, and indeed, this seems to be something that most of the women who message me pick up on and state as their reason for contacting me. Ladies, thoughts? " I thought i'd never stop laughing. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm attracted to men who have no idea how good looking they are & how funny & intelligent they are. Arrogance is a complete turn off for me." Hallelujah ! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Geek intelligence or street wise Define the difference? Some people are attracted to a intelligent scientist/businessman type Some go for the Bank robber/millionaire drug dealer type, Both can be classed as intelligent they just use their brains for different purposes " I think there's a misrepresentation there. My opinion differs thusly; Street smarts is more commonly defined by people smarts or problem solving, where as intellectual smarts are more commonly defined as analysing and planning. Whilst it's not a clear cut and is certainly open for debate, who is to say businessmen are predominantly intellectually smart, and that bank robbers are street smart. I left scientists and drug lords off the list because of the natures of the roles, however, there's politics in being a scientist that some scientists with street smarts use to outmaneuver other scientists, and I can't begin to imagine the kind of intellectual smarts required to run a billion dollar drugs racket, so it's subjective again. A successful businessman has to understand what makes people tick, which is predominantly classed as street smarts. And if you've ever watched a heist movie, the planning required to rob a bank is more intellectual than street savvy. Sorry to nitpick, I think that your comment was over simplistic therefore too generic for the kinds of roles you specified | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No it doesn't increase with age. I don't suffer fools gladly and never have. I don't like guys who think I should bow down to how intelligent/good looking/generally amazing they are/always looking for reaffirmation. In fact that applies to all people. Not just men. I prefer more spontaneous, laid back type of guys with a sense if humour that don't over think and analyse everything. Mindset wins over mind any day." Oopsy. Notorious over thinker and tsoh | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No it doesn't increase with age. I don't suffer fools gladly and never have. I don't like guys who think I should bow down to how intelligent/good looking/generally amazing they are/always looking for reaffirmation. In fact that applies to all people. Not just men. I prefer more spontaneous, laid back type of guys with a sense if humour that don't over think and analyse everything. Mindset wins over mind any day. Oopsy. Notorious over thinker and tsoh "Better over than under | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Geek intelligence or street wise Define the difference? Some people are attracted to a intelligent scientist/businessman type Some go for the Bank robber/millionaire drug dealer type, Both can be classed as intelligent they just use their brains for different purposes I think there's a misrepresentation there. My opinion differs thusly; Street smarts is more commonly defined by people smarts or problem solving, where as intellectual smarts are more commonly defined as analysing and planning. Whilst it's not a clear cut and is certainly open for debate, who is to say businessmen are predominantly intellectually smart, and that bank robbers are street smart. I left scientists and drug lords off the list because of the natures of the roles, however, there's politics in being a scientist that some scientists with street smarts use to outmaneuver other scientists, and I can't begin to imagine the kind of intellectual smarts required to run a billion dollar drugs racket, so it's subjective again. A successful businessman has to understand what makes people tick, which is predominantly classed as street smarts. And if you've ever watched a heist movie, the planning required to rob a bank is more intellectual than street savvy. Sorry to nitpick, I think that your comment was over simplistic therefore too generic for the kinds of roles you specified" Methinks you may watch too many Robbery Films, The successful Robber will watch Joe public in the Street, Customers and Staff behind the Ramp for Weeks to suss out their attitude and general mannerisms to try and figure out how they may react in a panic situation, That takes street smarts more than intellect. Nobody with a Higher Iq than a Hamster will go barging through the Doors letting off a Sawn off into the Ceiling A: its likely to set off the Fire Alarms/Water. B: All Bank Ceilings are crisscrossed with Alarm wires to prevent Entry from above. Gimp | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No it doesn't increase with age. I don't suffer fools gladly and never have. I don't like guys who think I should bow down to how intelligent/good looking/generally amazing they are/always looking for reaffirmation. In fact that applies to all people. Not just men. I prefer more spontaneous, laid back type of guys with a sense if humour that don't over think and analyse everything. Mindset wins over mind any day. Oopsy. Notorious over thinker and tsoh
Better over than under "Disagree. Sometimes it is nice to just not think about things and just do it. Life is too short. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No it doesn't increase with age. I don't suffer fools gladly and never have. I don't like guys who think I should bow down to how intelligent/good looking/generally amazing they are/always looking for reaffirmation. In fact that applies to all people. Not just men. I prefer more spontaneous, laid back type of guys with a sense if humour that don't over think and analyse everything. Mindset wins over mind any day. Oopsy. Notorious over thinker and tsoh
Better over than under
Disagree. Sometimes it is nice to just not think about things and just do it. Life is too short. "And it'll be a lot shorter if a person doesn't learn to look before they leap. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" And it'll be a lot shorter if a person doesn't learn to look before they leap." rather short and sweet than long and dull | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Op, you dont come across as particularly intelligent in your profile, you actually come across as fairly narrow minded and self centred." You don't have to justify your opinion, but I'm curious as to how you arrived at that conclusion? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Does any woman seek out a thick cunt? " In my limited experience, and even fewer incoming messages, no they don't.
ps Brian, are your standards slipping?
Your OP on this thread didn't seem to require the super intelligence needed to cut through the flowery and decipher what you actually mean.
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Does any woman seek out a thick cunt? In my limited experience, and even fewer incoming messages, no they don't.
ps Brian, are your standards slipping?
Your OP on this thread didn't seem to require the super intelligence needed to cut through the flowery and decipher what you actually mean.
"Do my postings come across as that esoteric? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Does any woman seek out a thick cunt? In my limited experience, and even fewer incoming messages, no they don't.
ps Brian, are your standards slipping?
Your OP on this thread didn't seem to require the super intelligence needed to cut through the flowery and decipher what you actually mean.
Do my postings come across as that esoteric?"You know they don't. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" *flowery pseudo crap" By pseudo crap you mean my postings aren't actually crap then? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Geek intelligence or street wise Define the difference? Some people are attracted to a intelligent scientist/businessman type Some go for the Bank robber/millionaire drug dealer type, Both can be classed as intelligent they just use their brains for different purposes I think there's a misrepresentation there. My opinion differs thusly; Street smarts is more commonly defined by people smarts or problem solving, where as intellectual smarts are more commonly defined as analysing and planning. Whilst it's not a clear cut and is certainly open for debate, who is to say businessmen are predominantly intellectually smart, and that bank robbers are street smart. I left scientists and drug lords off the list because of the natures of the roles, however, there's politics in being a scientist that some scientists with street smarts use to outmaneuver other scientists, and I can't begin to imagine the kind of intellectual smarts required to run a billion dollar drugs racket, so it's subjective again. A successful businessman has to understand what makes people tick, which is predominantly classed as street smarts. And if you've ever watched a heist movie, the planning required to rob a bank is more intellectual than street savvy. Sorry to nitpick, I think that your comment was over simplistic therefore too generic for the kinds of roles you specified Methinks you may watch too many Robbery Films, The successful Robber will watch Joe public in the Street, Customers and Staff behind the Ramp for Weeks to suss out their attitude and general mannerisms to try and figure out how they may react in a panic situation, That takes street smarts more than intellect. Nobody with a Higher Iq than a Hamster will go barging through the Doors letting off a Sawn off into the Ceiling A: its likely to set off the Fire Alarms/Water. B: All Bank Ceilings are crisscrossed with Alarm wires to prevent Entry from above. Gimp" Maybe lol, you make a fair point, it does take a high EQ to pull it off also | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Geek intelligence or street wise Define the difference? Some people are attracted to a intelligent scientist/businessman type Some go for the Bank robber/millionaire drug dealer type, Both can be classed as intelligent they just use their brains for different purposes I think there's a misrepresentation there. My opinion differs thusly; Street smarts is more commonly defined by people smarts or problem solving, where as intellectual smarts are more commonly defined as analysing and planning. Whilst it's not a clear cut and is certainly open for debate, who is to say businessmen are predominantly intellectually smart, and that bank robbers are street smart. I left scientists and drug lords off the list because of the natures of the roles, however, there's politics in being a scientist that some scientists with street smarts use to outmaneuver other scientists, and I can't begin to imagine the kind of intellectual smarts required to run a billion dollar drugs racket, so it's subjective again. A successful businessman has to understand what makes people tick, which is predominantly classed as street smarts. And if you've ever watched a heist movie, the planning required to rob a bank is more intellectual than street savvy. Sorry to nitpick, I think that your comment was over simplistic therefore too generic for the kinds of roles you specified Methinks you may watch too many Robbery Films, The successful Robber will watch Joe public in the Street, Customers and Staff behind the Ramp for Weeks to suss out their attitude and general mannerisms to try and figure out how they may react in a panic situation, That takes street smarts more than intellect. Nobody with a Higher Iq than a Hamster will go barging through the Doors letting off a Sawn off into the Ceiling A: its likely to set off the Fire Alarms/Water. B: All Bank Ceilings are crisscrossed with Alarm wires to prevent Entry from above. Gimp Maybe lol, you make a fair point, it does take a high EQ to pull it off also" Plus firing your sawn off the moment you enter the bank is stupid because then you have to reload. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" And it'll be a lot shorter if a person doesn't learn to look before they leap. rather short and sweet than long and dull" I don't tend to think at the club, just do. That's something I've had to practice | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Geek intelligence or street wise Define the difference? Some people are attracted to a intelligent scientist/businessman type Some go for the Bank robber/millionaire drug dealer type, Both can be classed as intelligent they just use their brains for different purposes I think there's a misrepresentation there. My opinion differs thusly; Street smarts is more commonly defined by people smarts or problem solving, where as intellectual smarts are more commonly defined as analysing and planning. Whilst it's not a clear cut and is certainly open for debate, who is to say businessmen are predominantly intellectually smart, and that bank robbers are street smart. I left scientists and drug lords off the list because of the natures of the roles, however, there's politics in being a scientist that some scientists with street smarts use to outmaneuver other scientists, and I can't begin to imagine the kind of intellectual smarts required to run a billion dollar drugs racket, so it's subjective again. A successful businessman has to understand what makes people tick, which is predominantly classed as street smarts. And if you've ever watched a heist movie, the planning required to rob a bank is more intellectual than street savvy. Sorry to nitpick, I think that your comment was over simplistic therefore too generic for the kinds of roles you specified Methinks you may watch too many Robbery Films, The successful Robber will watch Joe public in the Street, Customers and Staff behind the Ramp for Weeks to suss out their attitude and general mannerisms to try and figure out how they may react in a panic situation, That takes street smarts more than intellect. Nobody with a Higher Iq than a Hamster will go barging through the Doors letting off a Sawn off into the Ceiling A: its likely to set off the Fire Alarms/Water. B: All Bank Ceilings are crisscrossed with Alarm wires to prevent Entry from above. Gimp Maybe lol, you make a fair point, it does take a high EQ to pull it off also Plus firing your sawn off the moment you enter the bank is stupid because then you have to reload." Yeah, I would prefer the more subtle sleepover bandits approach, but not spend so long with them, just catch them as they're going in to open up | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Geek intelligence or street wise Define the difference? Some people are attracted to a intelligent scientist/businessman type Some go for the Bank robber/millionaire drug dealer type, Both can be classed as intelligent they just use their brains for different purposes I think there's a misrepresentation there. My opinion differs thusly; Street smarts is more commonly defined by people smarts or problem solving, where as intellectual smarts are more commonly defined as analysing and planning. Whilst it's not a clear cut and is certainly open for debate, who is to say businessmen are predominantly intellectually smart, and that bank robbers are street smart. I left scientists and drug lords off the list because of the natures of the roles, however, there's politics in being a scientist that some scientists with street smarts use to outmaneuver other scientists, and I can't begin to imagine the kind of intellectual smarts required to run a billion dollar drugs racket, so it's subjective again. A successful businessman has to understand what makes people tick, which is predominantly classed as street smarts. And if you've ever watched a heist movie, the planning required to rob a bank is more intellectual than street savvy. Sorry to nitpick, I think that your comment was over simplistic therefore too generic for the kinds of roles you specified Methinks you may watch too many Robbery Films, The successful Robber will watch Joe public in the Street, Customers and Staff behind the Ramp for Weeks to suss out their attitude and general mannerisms to try and figure out how they may react in a panic situation, That takes street smarts more than intellect. Nobody with a Higher Iq than a Hamster will go barging through the Doors letting off a Sawn off into the Ceiling A: its likely to set off the Fire Alarms/Water. B: All Bank Ceilings are crisscrossed with Alarm wires to prevent Entry from above. Gimp Maybe lol, you make a fair point, it does take a high EQ to pull it off also Plus firing your sawn off the moment you enter the bank is stupid because then you have to reload." Not unlike your shagging, so i've heard. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Does it increase with age? I ask because over the years, I've found I tend to attract women older than myself more so than any other age group, I've actually had sex with comparatively few girls my own age or younger by comparison. I consider my mind to be my most distinguishing factor, and indeed, this seems to be something that most of the women who message me pick up on and state as their reason for contacting me. Ladies, thoughts? " You're much more serious than most men of your age, so I would expect you to appeal to an older market, a lot of young women prefer frivolity. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Geek intelligence or street wise Define the difference? Some people are attracted to a intelligent scientist/businessman type Some go for the Bank robber/millionaire drug dealer type, Both can be classed as intelligent they just use their brains for different purposes I think there's a misrepresentation there. My opinion differs thusly; Street smarts is more commonly defined by people smarts or problem solving, where as intellectual smarts are more commonly defined as analysing and planning. Whilst it's not a clear cut and is certainly open for debate, who is to say businessmen are predominantly intellectually smart, and that bank robbers are street smart. I left scientists and drug lords off the list because of the natures of the roles, however, there's politics in being a scientist that some scientists with street smarts use to outmaneuver other scientists, and I can't begin to imagine the kind of intellectual smarts required to run a billion dollar drugs racket, so it's subjective again. A successful businessman has to understand what makes people tick, which is predominantly classed as street smarts. And if you've ever watched a heist movie, the planning required to rob a bank is more intellectual than street savvy. Sorry to nitpick, I think that your comment was over simplistic therefore too generic for the kinds of roles you specified Methinks you may watch too many Robbery Films, The successful Robber will watch Joe public in the Street, Customers and Staff behind the Ramp for Weeks to suss out their attitude and general mannerisms to try and figure out how they may react in a panic situation, That takes street smarts more than intellect. Nobody with a Higher Iq than a Hamster will go barging through the Doors letting off a Sawn off into the Ceiling A: its likely to set off the Fire Alarms/Water. B: All Bank Ceilings are crisscrossed with Alarm wires to prevent Entry from above. Gimp Maybe lol, you make a fair point, it does take a high EQ to pull it off also Plus firing your sawn off the moment you enter the bank is stupid because then you have to reload. Not unlike your shagging, so i've heard. "You've heard I have a reloadable, double barrelled sawn off penis? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Does it increase with age? I ask because over the years, I've found I tend to attract women older than myself more so than any other age group, I've actually had sex with comparatively few girls my own age or younger by comparison. I consider my mind to be my most distinguishing factor, and indeed, this seems to be something that most of the women who message me pick up on and state as their reason for contacting me. Ladies, thoughts? You're much more serious than most men of your age, so I would expect you to appeal to an older market, a lot of young women prefer frivolity." Even older women like frivolity over seriousness  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Intelligence in a man is something that I always find attractive - especially on the rare occasion that it's matched with the ability to hold an engaging two-way conversation (a rare thing!) I also find that intelligence and good manners are far more important than physical appearance.... But if I'm looking for a gentleman on Fab, and have to chose between intelligence and good looks, then I tend to chose the one with the biggest cock.... "I'm almost totally screwed then, all I got is manners, and that's sometimes hit and miss  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I am reluctant to comment on this thread for fear my straight talking Yorkshire upbringing might be mistaken for bullying." Don't bother Bobby. Allowing others to hang themselves is a much more effective way of spreading lasting knowledge through any community. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Does it increase with age? I ask because over the years, I've found I tend to attract women older than myself more so than any other age group, I've actually had sex with comparatively few girls my own age or younger by comparison. I consider my mind to be my most distinguishing factor, and indeed, this seems to be something that most of the women who message me pick up on and state as their reason for contacting me. Ladies, thoughts? You're much more serious than most men of your age, so I would expect you to appeal to an older market, a lot of young women prefer frivolity. Even older women like frivolity over seriousness "Yeah some, and they won't be chasing the OP! 
I like a mixture of both myself, either in extreme turn me off. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm attracted to men who have no idea how good looking they are & how funny & intelligent they are. Arrogance is a complete turn off for me." Unfortunately.... My grading in the looks and wit department are explained to me on a regular basis... ....my mum can be a very cruel woman. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Geek intelligence or street wise Define the difference? Some people are attracted to a intelligent scientist/businessman type Some go for the Bank robber/millionaire drug dealer type, Both can be classed as intelligent they just use their brains for different purposes I think there's a misrepresentation there. My opinion differs thusly; Street smarts is more commonly defined by people smarts or problem solving, where as intellectual smarts are more commonly defined as analysing and planning. Whilst it's not a clear cut and is certainly open for debate, who is to say businessmen are predominantly intellectually smart, and that bank robbers are street smart. I left scientists and drug lords off the list because of the natures of the roles, however, there's politics in being a scientist that some scientists with street smarts use to outmaneuver other scientists, and I can't begin to imagine the kind of intellectual smarts required to run a billion dollar drugs racket, so it's subjective again. A successful businessman has to understand what makes people tick, which is predominantly classed as street smarts. And if you've ever watched a heist movie, the planning required to rob a bank is more intellectual than street savvy. Sorry to nitpick, I think that your comment was over simplistic therefore too generic for the kinds of roles you specified Methinks you may watch too many Robbery Films, The successful Robber will watch Joe public in the Street, Customers and Staff behind the Ramp for Weeks to suss out their attitude and general mannerisms to try and figure out how they may react in a panic situation, That takes street smarts more than intellect. Nobody with a Higher Iq than a Hamster will go barging through the Doors letting off a Sawn off into the Ceiling A: its likely to set off the Fire Alarms/Water. B: All Bank Ceilings are crisscrossed with Alarm wires to prevent Entry from above. Gimp" Could they be better off bashing the back door in? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I am reluctant to comment on this thread for fear my straight talking Yorkshire upbringing might be mistaken for bullying." That's an impossibility Bobby, in order to bully someone, you have to be superior to them in some fashion | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I am reluctant to comment on this thread for fear my straight talking Yorkshire upbringing might be mistaken for bullying. That's an impossibility Bobby, in order to bully someone, you have to be superior to them in some fashion "They dont have to be superior that is rubbish!just being damn right nasty and cruel to the victim..sad fuckers..not superior. Her | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I am reluctant to comment on this thread for fear my straight talking Yorkshire upbringing might be mistaken for bullying. That's an impossibility Bobby, in order to bully someone, you have to be superior to them in some fashion They dont have to be superior that is rubbish!just being damn right nasty and cruel to the victim..sad fuckers..not superior.
Her"Well actually yes you're correct, after all, it certainly is pretty sad when you're in your 60s, and still driven by an urge to snipe pettily as part of the baying crowd. Still, you have to cover your insecurities somehow right? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I am reluctant to comment on this thread for fear my straight talking Yorkshire upbringing might be mistaken for bullying. That's an impossibility Bobby, in order to bully someone, you have to be superior to them in some fashion "No. Bullying occurs when a bully feels inferior to someone for whatever reason and doesn't have the self knowledge to understand this which results in them trying to take the other person down to make themselves feel better. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I am reluctant to comment on this thread for fear my straight talking Yorkshire upbringing might be mistaken for bullying. That's an impossibility Bobby, in order to bully someone, you have to be superior to them in some fashion
No. Bullying occurs when a bully feels inferior to someone for whatever reason and doesn't have the self knowledge to understand this which results in them trying to take the other person down to make themselves feel better." | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I am reluctant to comment on this thread for fear my straight talking Yorkshire upbringing might be mistaken for bullying. That's an impossibility Bobby, in order to bully someone, you have to be superior to them in some fashion
No. Bullying occurs when a bully feels inferior to someone for whatever reason and doesn't have the self knowledge to understand this which results in them trying to take the other person down to make themselves feel better."Sums up him up perfectly | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I am reluctant to comment on this thread for fear my straight talking Yorkshire upbringing might be mistaken for bullying. That's an impossibility Bobby, in order to bully someone, you have to be superior to them in some fashion
No. Bullying occurs when a bully feels inferior to someone for whatever reason and doesn't have the self knowledge to understand this which results in them trying to take the other person down to make themselves feel better.
Sums up him up perfectly "Actually, I don't think Bobby was being a bully. I was just trying to clarify what constitutes bullying. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"the sniping on both side of the discussion is very petty and silly..." Funny tho
Gimp | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"the sniping on both side of the discussion is very petty and silly... Funny tho
Gimp" | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"the sniping on both side of the discussion is very petty and silly..." Yup. I'm out  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"the sniping on both side of the discussion is very petty and silly..." It's not sniping though _iew, I'm simply doing what I always end up having to do - defend myself and my threads from those who constantly seek me out to attack. I make no secret that I promote myself through these threads, but ultimately this should have been a discussion on the differences and similarities between men and womens thinking, instead its become sexybrain VS the forum round 143. I probably shouldn't complain though, I rarely get more messages than when I'm holding fort against 4-5 of my usual detractors. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"the sniping on both side of the discussion is very petty and silly... It's not sniping though _iew, I'm simply doing what I always end up having to do - defend myself and my threads from those who constantly seek me out to attack. I make no secret that I promote myself through these threads, but ultimately this should have been a discussion on the differences and similarities between men and womens thinking, instead its become sexybrain VS the forum round 143. I probably shouldn't complain though, I rarely get more messages than when I'm holding fort against 4-5 of my usual detractors." I very rarely comment on your threads in direct reply to you as we probably hold differing _iews on subject, we are both indifferent to each other but I always know when I see a thread posted by you that it will result in the same activity. People who have an issue with you, an opinion about you can easily ignore all your threads and leave you to do the thing you issue. Equally, you can just ignore them and continue to focus on the people whose posts enrich your thread and take it in a direction that you enjoy. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"the sniping on both side of the discussion is very petty and silly... It's not sniping though _iew, I'm simply doing what I always end up having to do - defend myself and my threads from those who constantly seek me out to attack. I make no secret that I promote myself through these threads, but ultimately this should have been a discussion on the differences and similarities between men and womens thinking, instead its become sexybrain VS the forum round 143. I probably shouldn't complain though, I rarely get more messages than when I'm holding fort against 4-5 of my usual detractors. I very rarely comment on your threads in direct reply to you as we probably hold differing _iews on subject, we are both indifferent to each other but I always know when I see a thread posted by you that it will result in the same activity. People who have an issue with you, an opinion about you can easily ignore all your threads and leave you to do the thing you issue. Equally, you can just ignore them and continue to focus on the people whose posts enrich your thread and take it in a direction that you enjoy. " Whilst I often consider ignoring the sniping View, and usually do, but when these people group together in order to saturate my threads with their bile then I have little choice but to address it, as I said, I try to promote myself, and won't simply allow people to slur me unchallenged. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"as I said, I try to promote myself, and won't simply allow people to slur me unchallenged." cool.... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I could post a thread about how men mainly message me about my boobs & is this because they weren't breast fed as a baby so they latch onto my boobs because they feel they are missing it out." Well perhaps you should, that actually sounds like an interesting topic. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"the sniping on both side of the discussion is very petty and silly... It's not sniping though _iew, I'm simply doing what I always end up having to do - defend myself and my threads from those who constantly seek me out to attack. I make no secret that I promote myself through these threads, but ultimately this should have been a discussion on the differences and similarities between men and womens thinking, instead its become sexybrain VS the forum round 143. I probably shouldn't complain though, I rarely get more messages than when I'm holding fort against 4-5 of my usual detractors." I'm so pleased to be of service. Every little helps. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Unfortunately your thread just comes across as another look at me post. I could post a thread about how men mainly message me about my boobs & is this because they weren't breast fed as a baby so they latch onto my boobs because they feel they are missing it out. Would of course be a load of bollocks & would actually just be a look at me & my boobs thread "Those are by far the best sort of 'look at me' threads | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Though it should be said every single post on this forum is 'look at me' at some level, so I think that carp is a little invalid. Why don't people just ignore threads they are not interested in, I do? "Likewise, my mindset is that if someone is being an arsehole on the forum, as long as they're not directing it at me then it's fine, they'll sink on their own, my input isn't required to assist in that. I see a few people implying the same toward me, however, the fact that they DO feel the need to join in suggests that they don't actually believe it themselves. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Unfortunately your thread just comes across as another look at me post. I could post a thread about how men mainly message me about my boobs & is this because they weren't breast fed as a baby so they latch onto my boobs because they feel they are missing it out. Would of course be a load of bollocks & would actually just be a look at me & my boobs thread "I was breast fed .. Still fancy a latch on sometime .. Look at my bum please .. And fabs gratefully received too | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The references you make to using the forum as a tool to attract more attention leave me feeling the need to ask why you court this attention ? Is it with the mind to get a meet ?" More than one meet, but pretty much yes. "Would this meet entail sex ?" Possibly, it really does depend on the person and how we get on. "If so , how would the meet be likely to pan out before the sex ?" Friendly, chatty, relaxed. I wouldn't require them to write me an essay on why we should have sex, but connecting on a mental level would be nice. "I think that if the mind is such a major consideration for you , it may be that the hurdles required to reach the point of actually having sex may be too high for most to jump over." Someone said something very similar to me on a recent meet, she was surprised to find that whilst I'm not much different in person to how I am on here, I'm a lot more open, accessible and human face to face than I may sometimes come across in writing. "One may even feel that an iq test before a meet is asking too much ?" I don't require an IQ test to see if someone is intelligent or not before I meet them, you can generally spot the social butterflies, lone wolves and pack rats quite easily from their forum contributions - and yes, I do find a persons social group often reflects their intelligence. "Have you ever wondered what it may be like to just experience the carnal lust and desire of meeting a woman without thinking too much?" Horses for courses, I don't think I ever felt carnal lust and desire for anyone I didn't click with mentally. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Unfortunately your thread just comes across as another look at me post. I could post a thread about how men mainly message me about my boobs & is this because they weren't breast fed as a baby so they latch onto my boobs because they feel they are missing it out. Would of course be a load of bollocks & would actually just be a look at me & my boobs thread "Heeheee.....boobs | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think the problem is that it's a regular question of yours. Your user name clearer states that you believe your brain is sexy (and in your photos that it's located in your cock). It's Friday night, at the start of the school holidays and there are fewer people around. Bumping after 40 minutes also smacks of desperation to have your conversation. I hope that by responding I have given you whatever social interaction hit you were looking for. " You see *this* is why we need to have a "Like" button. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I am reluctant to comment on this thread for fear my straight talking Yorkshire upbringing might be mistaken for bullying. That's an impossibility Bobby, in order to bully someone, you have to be superior to them in some fashion "lol all this talk of intelligence... and then i read this hehehe | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think the problem is that it's a regular question of yours. Your user name clearer states that you believe your brain is sexy (and in your photos that it's located in your cock). It's Friday night, at the start of the school holidays and there are fewer people around. Bumping after 40 minutes also smacks of desperation to have your conversation. I hope that by responding I have given you whatever social interaction hit you were looking for. You see *this* is why we need to have a "Like" button." +2 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think the problem is that it's a regular question of yours. Your user name clearer states that you believe your brain is sexy (and in your photos that it's located in your cock). It's Friday night, at the start of the school holidays and there are fewer people around. Bumping after 40 minutes also smacks of desperation to have your conversation. I hope that by responding I have given you whatever social interaction hit you were looking for. You see *this* is why we need to have a "Like" button." To lend weight to arguments that don't stand well on their own you mean? I've already addressed this comment you wish to 'like' - feel free to engage me on any of my counter points if you feel you have something of value to offer the thread. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Wow BRIAN you are so intelligent" So was that attempt at sarcastic wit | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think the problem is that it's a regular question of yours. Your user name clearer states that you believe your brain is sexy (and in your photos that it's located in your cock). It's Friday night, at the start of the school holidays and there are fewer people around. Bumping after 40 minutes also smacks of desperation to have your conversation. I hope that by responding I have given you whatever social interaction hit you were looking for. You see *this* is why we need to have a "Like" button. To lend weight to arguments that don't stand well on their own you mean? I've already addressed this comment you wish to 'like' - feel free to engage me on any of my counter points if you feel you have something of value to offer the thread." It was funny and deserved the adulation I, and others offered it. Don't let it get to you. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Does it increase with age? I ask because over the years, I've found I tend to attract women older than myself more so than any other age group, I've actually had sex with comparatively few girls my own age or younger by comparison. I consider my mind to be my most distinguishing factor, and indeed, this seems to be something that most of the women who message me pick up on and state as their reason for contacting me. Ladies, thoughts? " I'm no lady but I think there's no gender bias to this question so here's my thoughts. Some women will be looking for something purely physica. Therefore someone's mind or intelligence level will be largely irrelevant, so long as there is physical/sexual attraction. If a meet is to be purely NSA and for pleasure/fun purposes physical attributes, knowledge of how to please and sexual ability will be priorities. There are many such women in swinging in general, in clubs and on Fab. Others require a higher level of mental connection and more of a 'meeting of minds'. They will seek to determine this is many ways. Through profile content, private messages, forum posts and live chats. This may lead to face to face socials which give the best opportunity to determine mental attraction and compatibility based on intellect, intelligence and emotional maturity. This may then lead to physical contact. The same is true of men. Regardless of which case above applies people make decisions based on what they see, read and what their gut feeling tells them about someone. This will be the case whether they are in their twenties, thirties, forties, fifties or older. It is not age dependant. If someone is attracting a specific demographic then there is usually one reason for this - how they present and portray themselves and how they come across through their profile words and images, and how they come across in forum posts, private messages and should they get that far - face to face meets. Patterns don't tend to occur randomly - else they wouldn't be a pattern. The Internet is a very 2D world. Hugely different to the 3D world of face to face interaction. Those that often struggle to find what they seek online in many cases fail to present themselves in such a way as to enable themselves to get to that 3D world, or for whatever reason choose to remain focused on a methodology that prevents their true self from being seen, by avoiding opportunities to show themselves to many rather than the one or two they hope to get noticed by - who in many cases wouldn't give them a second glance. For want of repeating myself (and many others) - if people aren't interested in group socials, parties and clubs that's their prerogative. If people choose to rely solely on internet based interaction in the hope it may lead to more that's their prerogative too. But one simple fact remains. Getting out from behind the keyboard and into the real world gives the best opportunity to show others your mind, intelligence, personality, physical characteristics and attitude - whether they are those you're looking to get naked with or just chat. Limit yourself to presenting yourself in 2D and you only have yourself to blame if life is an uphill struggle, you aren't attracting the kind of people you hope to and if people perceive you in a manner you don't think is right. So no. I don't think attraction to someone's mind - or body - changes in any set way according to age. I think it changes purely by an assessment of what can be seen, read and above all - by actually meeting them face to face and getting to know the real them rather than the Internet persona. A | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think the problem is that it's a regular question of yours. Your user name clearer states that you believe your brain is sexy (and in your photos that it's located in your cock). It's Friday night, at the start of the school holidays and there are fewer people around. Bumping after 40 minutes also smacks of desperation to have your conversation. I hope that by responding I have given you whatever social interaction hit you were looking for. You see *this* is why we need to have a "Like" button. To lend weight to arguments that don't stand well on their own you mean? I've already addressed this comment you wish to 'like' - feel free to engage me on any of my counter points if you feel you have something of value to offer the thread. It was funny and deserved the adulation I, and others offered it. Don't let it get to you." It didn't, hence why I offered you the opportunity to debate it. Would you like to? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Does it increase with age? I ask because over the years, I've found I tend to attract women older than myself more so than any other age group, I've actually had sex with comparatively few girls my own age or younger by comparison. I consider my mind to be my most distinguishing factor, and indeed, this seems to be something that most of the women who message me pick up on and state as their reason for contacting me. Ladies, thoughts? I'm no lady but I think there's no gender bias to this question so here's my thoughts. Some women will be looking for something purely physica. Therefore someone's mind or intelligence level will be largely irrelevant, so long as there is physical/sexual attraction. If a meet is to be purely NSA and for pleasure/fun purposes physical attributes, knowledge of how to please and sexual ability will be priorities. There are many such women in swinging in general, in clubs and on Fab. Others require a higher level of mental connection and more of a 'meeting of minds'. They will seek to determine this is many ways. Through profile content, private messages, forum posts and live chats. This may lead to face to face socials which give the best opportunity to determine mental attraction and compatibility based on intellect, intelligence and emotional maturity. This may then lead to physical contact. The same is true of men. Regardless of which case above applies people make decisions based on what they see, read and what their gut feeling tells them about someone. This will be the case whether they are in their twenties, thirties, forties, fifties or older. It is not age dependant. If someone is attracting a specific demographic then there is usually one reason for this - how they present and portray themselves and how they come across through their profile words and images, and how they come across in forum posts, private messages and should they get that far - face to face meets. Patterns don't tend to occur randomly - else they wouldn't be a pattern. The Internet is a very 2D world. Hugely different to the 3D world of face to face interaction. Those that often struggle to find what they seek online in many cases fail to present themselves in such a way as to enable themselves to get to that 3D world, or for whatever reason choose to remain focused on a methodology that prevents their true self from being seen, by avoiding opportunities to show themselves to many rather than the one or two they hope to get noticed by - who in many cases wouldn't give them a second glance. For want of repeating myself (and many others) - if people aren't interested in group socials, parties and clubs that's their prerogative. If people choose to rely solely on internet based interaction in the hope it may lead to more that's their prerogative too. But one simple fact remains. Getting out from behind the keyboard and into the real world gives the best opportunity to show others your mind, intelligence, personality, physical characteristics and attitude - whether they are those you're looking to get naked with or just chat. Limit yourself to presenting yourself in 2D and you only have yourself to blame if life is an uphill struggle, you aren't attracting the kind of people you hope to and if people perceive you in a manner you don't think is right. So no. I don't think attraction to someone's mind - or body - changes in any set way according to age. I think it changes purely by an assessment of what can be seen, read and above all - by actually meeting them face to face and getting to know the real them rather than the Internet persona. A" You talk a hell of a lot of sense | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Does it increase with age? I ask because over the years, I've found I tend to attract women older than myself more so than any other age group, I've actually had sex with comparatively few girls my own age or younger by comparison. I consider my mind to be my most distinguishing factor, and indeed, this seems to be something that most of the women who message me pick up on and state as their reason for contacting me. Ladies, thoughts? I'm no lady but I think there's no gender bias to this question so here's my thoughts. Some women will be looking for something purely physica. Therefore someone's mind or intelligence level will be largely irrelevant, so long as there is physical/sexual attraction. If a meet is to be purely NSA and for pleasure/fun purposes physical attributes, knowledge of how to please and sexual ability will be priorities. There are many such women in swinging in general, in clubs and on Fab. Others require a higher level of mental connection and more of a 'meeting of minds'. They will seek to determine this is many ways. Through profile content, private messages, forum posts and live chats. This may lead to face to face socials which give the best opportunity to determine mental attraction and compatibility based on intellect, intelligence and emotional maturity. This may then lead to physical contact. The same is true of men. Regardless of which case above applies people make decisions based on what they see, read and what their gut feeling tells them about someone. This will be the case whether they are in their twenties, thirties, forties, fifties or older. It is not age dependant. If someone is attracting a specific demographic then there is usually one reason for this - how they present and portray themselves and how they come across through their profile words and images, and how they come across in forum posts, private messages and should they get that far - face to face meets. Patterns don't tend to occur randomly - else they wouldn't be a pattern. The Internet is a very 2D world. Hugely different to the 3D world of face to face interaction. Those that often struggle to find what they seek online in many cases fail to present themselves in such a way as to enable themselves to get to that 3D world, or for whatever reason choose to remain focused on a methodology that prevents their true self from being seen, by avoiding opportunities to show themselves to many rather than the one or two they hope to get noticed by - who in many cases wouldn't give them a second glance. For want of repeating myself (and many others) - if people aren't interested in group socials, parties and clubs that's their prerogative. If people choose to rely solely on internet based interaction in the hope it may lead to more that's their prerogative too. But one simple fact remains. Getting out from behind the keyboard and into the real world gives the best opportunity to show others your mind, intelligence, personality, physical characteristics and attitude - whether they are those you're looking to get naked with or just chat. Limit yourself to presenting yourself in 2D and you only have yourself to blame if life is an uphill struggle, you aren't attracting the kind of people you hope to and if people perceive you in a manner you don't think is right. So no. I don't think attraction to someone's mind - or body - changes in any set way according to age. I think it changes purely by an assessment of what can be seen, read and above all - by actually meeting them face to face and getting to know the real them rather than the Internet persona. A You talk a hell of a lot of sense "He does - though in typical Obi fashion, his thoughts are dotted with the usual digs, sniping and implications of personal superiority that are as transparent to those observant enough to spot them as he accuses others of being. He knows most people aren't though, and no doubt he'll get plenty of the thumbs ups and accolades he carefully worded his post to encourage, rather than to impart any real wisdom toward the thread. Also interesting that his solution to pretty much every swinging related frustration is 'go to clubs and forum socials', and never bothers to consider or acknowledge the way people other than those he criticises act on here, or why. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It was funny and deserved the adulation I, and others offered it. Don't let it get to you. It didn't, hence why I offered you the opportunity to debate it. Would you like to?" Humour is subjective. You didn't like it. Several did, including me. Please don't sea lion me. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It was funny and deserved the adulation I, and others offered it. Don't let it get to you. It didn't, hence why I offered you the opportunity to debate it. Would you like to? Humour is subjective. You didn't like it. Several did, including me. Please don't sea lion me." I wouldn't call it humour - it was a dig, and several, like yourself, liked it because you don't like me. That's alright of course, you don't have to, but don't pretend it was because their was any real insight or humour in the statement which I have already addressed. I don't know what 'sea lioning' is, but if it's the same as patronising or talking to someone like a child, there's a simple solution - stop acting like a child. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Does it increase with age? I ask because over the years, I've found I tend to attract women older than myself more so than any other age group, I've actually had sex with comparatively few girls my own age or younger by comparison. I consider my mind to be my most distinguishing factor, and indeed, this seems to be something that most of the women who message me pick up on and state as their reason for contacting me. Ladies, thoughts? I'm no lady but I think there's no gender bias to this question so here's my thoughts. Some women will be looking for something purely physica. Therefore someone's mind or intelligence level will be largely irrelevant, so long as there is physical/sexual attraction. If a meet is to be purely NSA and for pleasure/fun purposes physical attributes, knowledge of how to please and sexual ability will be priorities. There are many such women in swinging in general, in clubs and on Fab. Others require a higher level of mental connection and more of a 'meeting of minds'. They will seek to determine this is many ways. Through profile content, private messages, forum posts and live chats. This may lead to face to face socials which give the best opportunity to determine mental attraction and compatibility based on intellect, intelligence and emotional maturity. This may then lead to physical contact. The same is true of men. Regardless of which case above applies people make decisions based on what they see, read and what their gut feeling tells them about someone. This will be the case whether they are in their twenties, thirties, forties, fifties or older. It is not age dependant. If someone is attracting a specific demographic then there is usually one reason for this - how they present and portray themselves and how they come across through their profile words and images, and how they come across in forum posts, private messages and should they get that far - face to face meets. Patterns don't tend to occur randomly - else they wouldn't be a pattern. The Internet is a very 2D world. Hugely different to the 3D world of face to face interaction. Those that often struggle to find what they seek online in many cases fail to present themselves in such a way as to enable themselves to get to that 3D world, or for whatever reason choose to remain focused on a methodology that prevents their true self from being seen, by avoiding opportunities to show themselves to many rather than the one or two they hope to get noticed by - who in many cases wouldn't give them a second glance. For want of repeating myself (and many others) - if people aren't interested in group socials, parties and clubs that's their prerogative. If people choose to rely solely on internet based interaction in the hope it may lead to more that's their prerogative too. But one simple fact remains. Getting out from behind the keyboard and into the real world gives the best opportunity to show others your mind, intelligence, personality, physical characteristics and attitude - whether they are those you're looking to get naked with or just chat. Limit yourself to presenting yourself in 2D and you only have yourself to blame if life is an uphill struggle, you aren't attracting the kind of people you hope to and if people perceive you in a manner you don't think is right. So no. I don't think attraction to someone's mind - or body - changes in any set way according to age. I think it changes purely by an assessment of what can be seen, read and above all - by actually meeting them face to face and getting to know the real them rather than the Internet persona. A You talk a hell of a lot of sense
He does - though in typical Obi fashion, his thoughts are dotted with the usual digs, sniping and implications of personal superiority that are as transparent to those observant enough to spot them as he accuses others of being. He knows most people aren't though, and no doubt he'll get plenty of the thumbs ups and accolades he carefully worded his post to encourage, rather than to impart any real wisdom toward the thread.
Also interesting that his solution to pretty much every swinging related frustration is 'go to clubs and forum socials', and never bothers to consider or acknowledge the way people other than those he criticises act on here, or why."You see digs from some even when they engage as your thread suggests they should. You then put words and sentiments not in the post. I have said this on another thread but I'll say it again, how you perceive what is written is coloured by your own _iews. Just the same as any of us. Why you think you are doing something else escapes me. Finally, just because someone else likes and finds amusing doesn't mean there's a whole gang of people sitting around a screen discussing you and what to post before posting it. You've addressed what you don't like about my posts on this thread, credit the other readers with the intelligence to read the thread and make their own judgements or is that your domain alone? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Play nicely, you two or we will get the [Closed by ...] before long. And I'm not letting on who I think is winning the war of words. "On word count alone it can't be me. I'm secure in my intelligence for now. When the dementia eats my brain I might not be. Will I be an older woman more interested in younger men with sexy brains then I don't know. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I wouldn't call it humour - it was a dig, and several, like yourself, liked it because you don't like me. That's alright of course, you don't have to, but don't pretend it was because their was any real insight or humour in the statement which I have already addressed. I don't know what 'sea lioning' is, but if it's the same as patronising or talking to someone like a child, there's a simple solution - stop acting like a child." I don't know you. Why would I dislike you? The comment was funny. I'm sorry that it came at your expense but hey, it happens. You not seeing it as humour is likely due to being the target but that does not negate it being funny. Again, humour is entirely subjective and you are not the arbiter of what passes for a joke. You can find out relatively easily what sea lioning is by using Google. I hope you'll not continue to take it personally that someone found a joke funny and that perhaps you can find it within yourself to let it go. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ok, lets give this a go: The references you make to using the forum as a tool to attract more attention leave me feeling the need to ask why you court this attention ? Is it with the mind to get a meet ? More than one meet, but pretty much yes. Would this meet entail sex ? Possibly, it really does depend on the person and how we get on. If so , how would the meet be likely to pan out before the sex ? Friendly, chatty, relaxed. I wouldn't require them to write me an essay on why we should have sex, but connecting on a mental level would be nice. I think that if the mind is such a major consideration for you , it may be that the hurdles required to reach the point of actually having sex may be too high for most to jump over. Someone said something very similar to me on a recent meet, she was surprised to find that whilst I'm not much different in person to how I am on here, I'm a lot more open, accessible and human face to face than I may sometimes come across in writing. One may even feel that an iq test before a meet is asking too much ? I don't require an IQ test to see if someone is intelligent or not before I meet them, you can generally spot the social butterflies, lone wolves and pack rats quite easily from their forum contributions - and yes, I do find a persons social group often reflects their intelligence. Have you ever wondered what it may be like to just experience the carnal lust and desire of meeting a woman without thinking too much? Horses for courses, I don't think I ever felt carnal lust and desire for anyone I didn't click with mentally." Thank you for your answers | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Does it increase with age? I ask because over the years, I've found I tend to attract women older than myself more so than any other age group, I've actually had sex with comparatively few girls my own age or younger by comparison. I consider my mind to be my most distinguishing factor, and indeed, this seems to be something that most of the women who message me pick up on and state as their reason for contacting me. Ladies, thoughts? " It isn't intelligence that first attracts me to a man, it's the superficial things, looks, height, eyebrows, penis size. Anything else is just a bonus and this hasn't changed through the years. I'm what you would call a jack of all trades, master of none! I know a little bit about almost any subject you could possibly ever discuss. I've got hyperthymesia so my memory is like a black hole that sucks everything in and nothing ever escapes it. No one man could satisfy me with regards to intelligence, every single person has at least one subject that they know a lot about. You can learn something from every single person you meet, intelligence isn't the main thing I would go for, as long as they have enough intelligence to understand what the fucks going on in an argument, nothing more frustrating than arguing with a stupid person. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Does it increase with age? I ask because over the years, I've found I tend to attract women older than myself more so than any other age group, I've actually had sex with comparatively few girls my own age or younger by comparison. I consider my mind to be my most distinguishing factor, and indeed, this seems to be something that most of the women who message me pick up on and state as their reason for contacting me. Ladies, thoughts? I'm no lady but I think there's no gender bias to this question so here's my thoughts. Some women will be looking for something purely physica. Therefore someone's mind or intelligence level will be largely irrelevant, so long as there is physical/sexual attraction. If a meet is to be purely NSA and for pleasure/fun purposes physical attributes, knowledge of how to please and sexual ability will be priorities. There are many such women in swinging in general, in clubs and on Fab. Others require a higher level of mental connection and more of a 'meeting of minds'. They will seek to determine this is many ways. Through profile content, private messages, forum posts and live chats. This may lead to face to face socials which give the best opportunity to determine mental attraction and compatibility based on intellect, intelligence and emotional maturity. This may then lead to physical contact. The same is true of men. Regardless of which case above applies people make decisions based on what they see, read and what their gut feeling tells them about someone. This will be the case whether they are in their twenties, thirties, forties, fifties or older. It is not age dependant. If someone is attracting a specific demographic then there is usually one reason for this - how they present and portray themselves and how they come across through their profile words and images, and how they come across in forum posts, private messages and should they get that far - face to face meets. Patterns don't tend to occur randomly - else they wouldn't be a pattern. The Internet is a very 2D world. Hugely different to the 3D world of face to face interaction. Those that often struggle to find what they seek online in many cases fail to present themselves in such a way as to enable themselves to get to that 3D world, or for whatever reason choose to remain focused on a methodology that prevents their true self from being seen, by avoiding opportunities to show themselves to many rather than the one or two they hope to get noticed by - who in many cases wouldn't give them a second glance. For want of repeating myself (and many others) - if people aren't interested in group socials, parties and clubs that's their prerogative. If people choose to rely solely on internet based interaction in the hope it may lead to more that's their prerogative too. But one simple fact remains. Getting out from behind the keyboard and into the real world gives the best opportunity to show others your mind, intelligence, personality, physical characteristics and attitude - whether they are those you're looking to get naked with or just chat. Limit yourself to presenting yourself in 2D and you only have yourself to blame if life is an uphill struggle, you aren't attracting the kind of people you hope to and if people perceive you in a manner you don't think is right. So no. I don't think attraction to someone's mind - or body - changes in any set way according to age. I think it changes purely by an assessment of what can be seen, read and above all - by actually meeting them face to face and getting to know the real them rather than the Internet persona. A You talk a hell of a lot of sense
He does - though in typical Obi fashion, his thoughts are dotted with the usual digs, sniping and implications of personal superiority that are as transparent to those observant enough to spot them as he accuses others of being. He knows most people aren't though, and no doubt he'll get plenty of the thumbs ups and accolades he carefully worded his post to encourage, rather than to impart any real wisdom toward the thread.
Also interesting that his solution to pretty much every swinging related frustration is 'go to clubs and forum socials', and never bothers to consider or acknowledge the way people other than those he criticises act on here, or why.
You see digs from some even when they engage as your thread suggests they should. You then put words and sentiments not in the post. I have said this on another thread but I'll say it again, how you perceive what is written is coloured by your own _iews. Just the same as any of us. Why you think you are doing something else escapes me."So you believe what is written is subjective to the person reading it rather than an actual statement being made by the author, however thinly disguised it is? "Finally, just because someone else likes and finds amusing doesn't mean there's a whole gang of people sitting around a screen discussing you and what to post before posting it. You've addressed what you don't like about my posts on this thread, credit the other readers with the intelligence to read the thread and make their own judgements or is that your domain alone? " And yet, you always see the same small group of people supporting one another, contributing to the same threads, over and over...I don't believe it's a conspiracy, simply the 'clique' mentality of those who lack the ability to fight their battles alone. "Play nicely, you two or we will get the [Closed by ...] before long. And I'm not letting on who I think is winning the war of words. "It's whoever you personally like best, whether or not your opinion is objectively accurate however is another matter, but still, you're entitled to it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Intelligence, like looks, is subjective. ...is it? "Yes | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Intelligence, like looks, is subjective. ...is it?
Yes "I can't in good faith agree. Looks are in the eye of the beholder (we all have preferences) but intelligence, in whatever form you choose, is quantifiable. The degrees may be arbitrary but it will always be possible to say that person A exceeds capability in a task comparatively with person B. If you name a measure of smarts, whatever it may be, there will be some way to prove superiority over another. I appreciate that this might suck for the person B above but maybe person B is a better chess player than person A, or a faster sprinter? Everyone has talents. We're not all equal at everything and those who excel at one thing might be dreadful in other metrics. I've met many genuinely smart people in my lifetime and they have certainly exceeded my knowledge in many areas but there is always *something* I can do better. I like that way of thinking as it prevents me from having a meltdown when it turns out that actually, I'm not the smartest guy in the room. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You see digs from some even when they engage as your thread suggests they should. You then put words and sentiments not in the post. I have said this on another thread but I'll say it again, how you perceive what is written is coloured by your own _iews." And yet, further up the thread, your statement, and my response to it: "As to you standing out on the forum, to quote you loosely (and not exactly as I can't be arsed to find the thread(s) on that) you have previously stated that the fora has no women that would interest you, based on our various failings...us old, fat and frankly uppity women." ...case in point, indeed I have been honest about the fact that few women on the forums interest me, however, that was about as descriptive as I got, YOU have chosen to interpret this in a blatantly offensive fashion, hence why I feel the need to respond - misrepresentation again." You felt it necessary yourself to add a load of offensive, inflammatory descriptors (failings...old, fat, uppity women) to your post that I never said - you simply interpreted my thoughts as suited you and then dressed them up in a way needed to support your argument - hypocritical much? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Actually, just to add... You see digs from some even when they engage as your thread suggests they should. You then put words and sentiments not in the post. I have said this on another thread but I'll say it again, how you perceive what is written is coloured by your own _iews. And yet, further up the thread, your statement, and my response to it: As to you standing out on the forum, to quote you loosely (and not exactly as I can't be arsed to find the thread(s) on that) you have previously stated that the fora has no women that would interest you, based on our various failings...us old, fat and frankly uppity women." ...case in point, indeed I have been honest about the fact that few women on the forums interest me, however, that was about as descriptive as I got, YOU have chosen to interpret this in a blatantly offensive fashion, hence why I feel the need to respond - misrepresentation again. You felt it necessary yourself to add a load of offensive, inflammatory descriptors (failings...old, fat, uppity women) to your post that I never said - you simply interpreted my thoughts as suited you and then dressed them up in a way needed to support your argument - hypocritical much?" Obsessed much? I didn't say you said anything about old, fat etc. It was free writing. You make whip up as much indignant feelings of injustice as you like but my point at the beginning was that you bumped your thread to get it attention. I gave it attention. All the rest is just from your indignation at the attention I gave. There, I gave you some more so I expect you'll get whipped up into a frenzy of what I said and I what I meant and how it does not acccurately represent what you said at 4.02pm. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Intelligence, like looks, is subjective. ...is it?
Yes
I can't in good faith agree.
Looks are in the eye of the beholder (we all have preferences) but intelligence, in whatever form you choose, is quantifiable. The degrees may be arbitrary but it will always be possible to say that person A exceeds capability in a task comparatively with person B.
If you name a measure of smarts, whatever it may be, there will be some way to prove superiority over another.
I appreciate that this might suck for the person B above but maybe person B is a better chess player than person A, or a faster sprinter?
Everyone has talents. We're not all equal at everything and those who excel at one thing might be dreadful in other metrics.
I've met many genuinely smart people in my lifetime and they have certainly exceeded my knowledge in many areas but there is always *something* I can do better.
I like that way of thinking as it prevents me from having a meltdown when it turns out that actually, I'm not the smartest guy in the room."Although I agree with your points on quantifiable, intelligence is still subjective , I'd cite or use chaos theory which aknowledges the point that over x variables deems a system unknowable. Although obviously there will be notable extremes it would prove exhausting and fruitless to differentiate between millions of humans on any objective scale And anyway the fact so many perspectives upon whom and what would quantify as scales. upon which to be assessed. Make the concept of intelligence or what it constitutes a subjective one xx Knowing how to sound intelligent is not a measure of intelligence xx | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Actually, just to add... You see digs from some even when they engage as your thread suggests they should. You then put words and sentiments not in the post. I have said this on another thread but I'll say it again, how you perceive what is written is coloured by your own _iews. And yet, further up the thread, your statement, and my response to it: As to you standing out on the forum, to quote you loosely (and not exactly as I can't be arsed to find the thread(s) on that) you have previously stated that the fora has no women that would interest you, based on our various failings...us old, fat and frankly uppity women." ...case in point, indeed I have been honest about the fact that few women on the forums interest me, however, that was about as descriptive as I got, YOU have chosen to interpret this in a blatantly offensive fashion, hence why I feel the need to respond - misrepresentation again. You felt it necessary yourself to add a load of offensive, inflammatory descriptors (failings...old, fat, uppity women) to your post that I never said - you simply interpreted my thoughts as suited you and then dressed them up in a way needed to support your argument - hypocritical much? Obsessed much? I didn't say you said anything about old, fat etc. It was free writing."
"You make whip up as much indignant feelings of injustice as you like but my point at the beginning was that you bumped your thread to get it attention. I gave it attention. All the rest is just from your indignation at the attention I gave." You write as though you're offended by the fact that I found your criticisms offensive, and somehow didn't expect any sort of argument against them? "There, I gave you some more so I expect you'll get whipped up into a frenzy of what I said and I what I meant and how it does not acccurately represent what you said at 4.02pm." I wouldn't call this a frenzy, I'm just surprised at the childishness of your arguments. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"When locking horns in a battle of wits with Lickety I'd suggest it unwise to be unarmed. This lady has remarkable intellect!" Compared to yourself, so does a rock. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"When locking horns in a battle of wits with Lickety I'd suggest it unwise to be unarmed. This lady has remarkable intellect! Compared to yourself, so does a rock." Sorry but that's just made me spit my tea out ! A perfect response | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"When locking horns in a battle of wits with Lickety I'd suggest it unwise to be unarmed. This lady has remarkable intellect! Compared to yourself, so does a rock." I'm sure all those women who message you because of your mind will be very impressed so far by this thread | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"When locking horns in a battle of wits with Lickety I'd suggest it unwise to be unarmed. This lady has remarkable intellect! Compared to yourself, so does a rock. I'm sure all those women who message you because of your mind will be very impressed so far by this thread "Oh come on now , I am still laughing at that last post , utterly brilliant | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Oh for goodness sake SB. People are trying to tell you that these threads do you no favours. Lickety was actually offering advice. Good advice. If you use this amazing brain you think you have to start threads and involve yourself in threads on subjects other than how great you are, you might find you have more success. You always get defensive about this though because you have an entrenched belief that your way is the correct and only way and any lack of success is the fault of anyone, everyone, but you. You get the negative comments and 'digs' as a result of people being tired of you failing to realise this and persisting with the same old routine. There's no 'clique' that's after you. Nobody sits and discusses their latest campaign against you. There are merely a number of people that see things the same way. It's a campaign of attack to you only because you are incapable of seeing how you come across, how you hamper your own chances and realising that when numerous other people see something, there may be something in it. You've bemoaned your lack of success before. You clearly state you need to work at standing out. To me, someone with a good brain would take on board multiple, repeated suggestions by many different people, that they are actually harming, not helping, their own cause and give some thought to at least trying another way." That's an excellent post . The ability to see through the backbiting , digs and so on , and to sum it up perfectly | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Oh for goodness sake SB. People are trying to tell you that these threads do you no favours. Lickety was actually offering advice. Good advice. If you use this amazing brain you think you have to start threads and involve yourself in threads on subjects other than how great you are, you might find you have more success. You always get defensive about this though because you have an entrenched belief that your way is the correct and only way and any lack of success is the fault of anyone, everyone, but you. You get the negative comments and 'digs' as a result of people being tired of you failing to realise this and persisting with the same old routine. There's no 'clique' that's after you. Nobody sits and discusses their latest campaign against you. There are merely a number of people that see things the same way. It's a campaign of attack to you only because you are incapable of seeing how you come across, how you hamper your own chances and realising that when numerous other people see something, there may be something in it. You've bemoaned your lack of success before. You clearly state you need to work at standing out. To me, someone with a good brain would take on board multiple, repeated suggestions by many different people, that they are actually harming, not helping, their own cause and give some thought to at least trying another way. That's an excellent post . The ability to see through the backbiting , digs and so on , and to sum it up perfectly "I have been responsible for some of the digs in the past, through the frustration I mentioned. I'd love for SB to take this on board. To see someone trying so hard but hampering their own chances at every step and then blaming everyone else is head/desk interface inducing. I'd love for SB to be getting great meets. I'd love to see more different types of posts from him in place of his advertising. There's no downside. He and his meets have fun, there's more fun in the forum and less angst. Unfortunately, I think SB is so committed to his belief that his way is the right way, I don't think he will be willing or able to try something different. I say this having seen other people try, and fail, many times before. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Chiiiilllllll I think I've been more or less saying the same thing all day on the forum People are bitey and grumpy,is it because the weather is shit? I'd like to pin SB down and tickle him until he crys with laughter and relaxes enough to not think so hard "Are you the kind of woman who'd beat me up Honeypot? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Chiiiilllllll I think I've been more or less saying the same thing all day on the forum People are bitey and grumpy,is it because the weather is shit? I'd like to pin SB down and tickle him until he crys with laughter and relaxes enough to not think so hard
Are you the kind of woman who'd beat me up Honeypot?"Noooooooo | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Chiiiilllllll I think I've been more or less saying the same thing all day on the forum People are bitey and grumpy,is it because the weather is shit? I'd like to pin SB down and tickle him until he crys with laughter and relaxes enough to not think so hard
Are you the kind of woman who'd beat me up Honeypot?
Noooooooo "I don't believe you | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Chiiiilllllll I think I've been more or less saying the same thing all day on the forum People are bitey and grumpy,is it because the weather is shit? I'd like to pin SB down and tickle him until he crys with laughter and relaxes enough to not think so hard "Has anyone questioned if too much technology makes people grumpy (he says using a technological tool  ) | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Intelligence, like looks, is subjective. ...is it? "How can it not be?! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Intelligence, like looks, is subjective. ...is it?
How can it not be?!
"How can it be not not be ? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Intelligence, like looks, is subjective. ...is it?
How can it not be?!
How can it be not not be ?"Is that Shakespeare ?
Gimp | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Intelligence, like looks, is subjective. ...is it?
How can it not be?!
How can it be not not be ?
Is that Shakespeare ?
Gimp"Forsooth it be pisstakethspeare be it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Intelligence, like looks, is subjective. ...is it?
How can it not be?!
How can it be not not be ?
Is that Shakespeare ?
Gimp
Forsooth it be pisstakethspeare be it. "Gadzooks Granny Wench, Lest it be nobler in the Mind than sticking out yer Ear 
Yorrick Gimp | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Intelligence, like looks, is subjective. ...is it?
How can it not be?!
How can it be not not be ?
Is that Shakespeare ?
Gimp
Forsooth it be pisstakethspeare be it.
Gadzooks Granny Wench, Lest it be nobler in the Mind than sticking out yer Ear
Yorrick Gimp"Methinkest thou meanst twud be nobbler in the sexybrain thanst protruding externally from whence thine sounds enter thy blessed cranium ! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No it doesn't increase with age. I don't suffer fools gladly and never have. I don't like guys who think I should bow down to how intelligent/good looking/generally amazing they are/always looking for reaffirmation. In fact that applies to all people. Not just men. I prefer more spontaneous, laid back type of guys with a sense if humour that don't over think and analyse everything. Mindset wins over mind any day. Oopsy. Notorious over thinker and tsoh
Better over than under "Not necessarily. You can make a simple thing more complex than you need to. But then it's all down to what you're comfortable with. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No it doesn't increase with age. I don't suffer fools gladly and never have. I don't like guys who think I should bow down to how intelligent/good looking/generally amazing they are/always looking for reaffirmation. In fact that applies to all people. Not just men. I prefer more spontaneous, laid back type of guys with a sense if humour that don't over think and analyse everything. Mindset wins over mind any day. Oopsy. Notorious over thinker and tsoh
Better over than under
Not necessarily. You can make a simple thing more complex than you need to. But then it's all down to what you're comfortable with."I like switching my phone off sometimes. One less distraction | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
