Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"how do you decide who can be a parent how do you know if somebody will be a good parent or a bad one till they have had kids?" Hypothetically - We eduacate them through schooling and test them at an appropriate age ... let's say 25. If you don't get a first .... no kids | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't think anyone should be a parent without completing a course! ....actually that was half joke, half truth. ...I couldn't believe when my neighbour didn't know what to do when her daughter scalded herself and glad I was in when she knocked on my door. Why aren't parents given basic first aid knowledgeduring ante natal Rather than concentrating on their birthing plans,that go out the window anyway " How do we deal with human rights arguements etc ? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't think anyone should be a parent without completing a course! ....actually that was half joke, half truth. ...I couldn't believe when my neighbour didn't know what to do when her daughter scalded herself and glad I was in when she knocked on my door. Why aren't parents given basic first aid knowledgeduring ante natal Rather than concentrating on their birthing plans,that go out the window anyway " actually that is a great point...people looking after your kids have to be trained in pediatric first aid....why shouldnt parents be required to do the same? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't think anyone should be a parent without completing a course! ....actually that was half joke, half truth. ...I couldn't believe when my neighbour didn't know what to do when her daughter scalded herself and glad I was in when she knocked on my door. Why aren't parents given basic first aid knowledgeduring ante natal Rather than concentrating on their birthing plans,that go out the window anyway How do we deal with human rights arguements etc ?" I don't care about human rights. Surely each child has a right to be looked after and cared for? That has to come before any human right? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't think anyone should be a parent without completing a course! ....actually that was half joke, half truth. ...I couldn't believe when my neighbour didn't know what to do when her daughter scalded herself and glad I was in when she knocked on my door. Why aren't parents given basic first aid knowledgeduring ante natal Rather than concentrating on their birthing plans,that go out the window anyway How do we deal with human rights arguements etc ? I don't care about human rights. Surely each child has a right to be looked after and cared for? That has to come before any human right? " So. Do we sterilise those that we don't deem fit enough to parent ? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't think anyone should be a parent without completing a course! ....actually that was half joke, half truth. ...I couldn't believe when my neighbour didn't know what to do when her daughter scalded herself and glad I was in when she knocked on my door. Why aren't parents given basic first aid knowledgeduring ante natal Rather than concentrating on their birthing plans,that go out the window anyway How do we deal with human rights arguements etc ? I don't care about human rights. Surely each child has a right to be looked after and cared for? That has to come before any human right? So. Do we sterilise those that we don't deem fit enough to parent ?" In the very rare case we do. Maybe the scope should be widened somewhat. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't think anyone should be a parent without completing a course! ....actually that was half joke, half truth. ...I couldn't believe when my neighbour didn't know what to do when her daughter scalded herself and glad I was in when she knocked on my door. Why aren't parents given basic first aid knowledgeduring ante natal Rather than concentrating on their birthing plans,that go out the window anyway How do we deal with human rights arguements etc ? I don't care about human rights. Surely each child has a right to be looked after and cared for? That has to come before any human right? So. Do we sterilise those that we don't deem fit enough to parent ?" Of course not. ...although I'd love to be able to do that. ...i just think parents should be better prepared and educated. ...especially those that lack common sense | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Hmm eugenicsy smell about here?" Absolutely. I wanted to see how far the thread went before the parallels became apparent. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You mean almost like china? Like 1 kid per family lol." Or maybe the Indian sub-continent method? Having said that, isn't the annual UK abortion figure somewhere north of 800,000 per year? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Hmm eugenicsy smell about here? Absolutely. I wanted to see how far the thread went before the parallels became apparent. " It was fairly obvious that was the angle you were going for. It's not about that - it's about taking responsibility. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"how do you decide who can be a parent how do you know if somebody will be a good parent or a bad one till they have had kids? Hypothetically - We eduacate them through schooling and test them at an appropriate age ... let's say 25. If you don't get a first .... no kids " most round here are grandparents by that age | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"how do you decide who can be a parent how do you know if somebody will be a good parent or a bad one till they have had kids? Hypothetically - We eduacate them through schooling and test them at an appropriate age ... let's say 25. If you don't get a first .... no kids most round here are grandparents by that age " so true | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not getting sucked into this either. " You've been sucked. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not getting sucked into this either. You've been sucked. " Can I be sucked? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't think anyone should be a parent without completing a course! ....actually that was half joke, half truth. ...I couldn't believe when my neighbour didn't know what to do when her daughter scalded herself and glad I was in when she knocked on my door. Why aren't parents given basic first aid knowledgeduring ante natal Rather than concentrating on their birthing plans,that go out the window anyway How do we deal with human rights arguements etc ? I don't care about human rights. Surely each child has a right to be looked after and cared for? That has to come before any human right? " Are kids not humans?and is not caring for a child a definition of a human right for the child? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"how do you decide who can be a parent how do you know if somebody will be a good parent or a bad one till they have had kids? Hypothetically - We eduacate them through schooling and test them at an appropriate age ... let's say 25. If you don't get a first .... no kids most round here are grandparents by that age so true " It always makes me laugh at the amount of people who are utterly shocked that I have two daughters in their 20s and no grandkids, it's never been known round here | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You mean almost like china? Like 1 kid per family lol. Or maybe the Indian sub-continent method? Having said that, isn't the annual UK abortion figure somewhere north of 800,000 per year? " YEs haven't heard about the indian thing, what they do there? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"In my line of work I see a lot of fucked up parenting and seen and read some shocking things I often do wonder after they have had all their kids taken into care and are pregnant again knowing that the baby once born will be taken into care once born, why get pregnant again knowing you will never bring up that child..." Because they haven't been educated in birth control? should never just assum adults know these things cause some genuinely have no common sense | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"how do you decide who can be a parent how do you know if somebody will be a good parent or a bad one till they have had kids? Hypothetically - We eduacate them through schooling and test them at an appropriate age ... let's say 25. If you don't get a first .... no kids most round here are grandparents by that age so true It always makes me laugh at the amount of people who are utterly shocked that I have two daughters in their 20s and no grandkids, it's never been known round here " I know someone who is a grandmother at 35, I'm thinking I'm 35 and not yet a mother... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"how do you decide who can be a parent how do you know if somebody will be a good parent or a bad one till they have had kids? Hypothetically - We eduacate them through schooling and test them at an appropriate age ... let's say 25. If you don't get a first .... no kids most round here are grandparents by that age so true It always makes me laugh at the amount of people who are utterly shocked that I have two daughters in their 20s and no grandkids, it's never been known round here I know someone who is a grandmother at 35, I'm thinking I'm 35 and not yet a mother... " My 14 year old goes to school with a kid who's pregnant her mum is 29 | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't think anyone should be a parent without completing a course! ....actually that was half joke, half truth. ...I couldn't believe when my neighbour didn't know what to do when her daughter scalded herself and glad I was in when she knocked on my door. Why aren't parents given basic first aid knowledgeduring ante natal Rather than concentrating on their birthing plans,that go out the window anyway How do we deal with human rights arguements etc ? I don't care about human rights. Surely each child has a right to be looked after and cared for? That has to come before any human right? So. Do we sterilise those that we don't deem fit enough to parent ?" Yes please. And if you have 2 or more police cautions by the time you're 16 its transportation!! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"how do you decide who can be a parent how do you know if somebody will be a good parent or a bad one till they have had kids? Hypothetically - We eduacate them through schooling and test them at an appropriate age ... let's say 25. If you don't get a first .... no kids most round here are grandparents by that age so true It always makes me laugh at the amount of people who are utterly shocked that I have two daughters in their 20s and no grandkids, it's never been known round here I know someone who is a grandmother at 35, I'm thinking I'm 35 and not yet a mother... My 14 year old goes to school with a kid who's pregnant her mum is 29 " Jesus do they drink in the tilted barrel | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't think anyone should be a parent without completing a course! ....actually that was half joke, half truth. ...I couldn't believe when my neighbour didn't know what to do when her daughter scalded herself and glad I was in when she knocked on my door. Why aren't parents given basic first aid knowledgeduring ante natal Rather than concentrating on their birthing plans,that go out the window anyway How do we deal with human rights arguements etc ? I don't care about human rights. Surely each child has a right to be looked after and cared for? That has to come before any human right? Are kids not humans?and is not caring for a child a definition of a human right for the child?" Ffs a pedant......Yes kids are humans. Their rights to be safeguarded as a child comes before any human right. ...surely you can't argue that? ?? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Hmm eugenicsy smell about here? Absolutely. I wanted to see how far the thread went before the parallels became apparent. It was fairly obvious that was the angle you were going for. It's not about that - it's about taking responsibility." I think you think you are on the other thread. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't think anyone should be a parent without completing a course! ....actually that was half joke, half truth. ...I couldn't believe when my neighbour didn't know what to do when her daughter scalded herself and glad I was in when she knocked on my door. Why aren't parents given basic first aid knowledgeduring ante natal Rather than concentrating on their birthing plans,that go out the window anyway How do we deal with human rights arguements etc ? I don't care about human rights. Surely each child has a right to be looked after and cared for? That has to come before any human right? So. Do we sterilise those that we don't deem fit enough to parent ? Yes please. And if you have 2 or more police cautions by the time you're 16 its transportation!! " I think giving them cars is fairly irresponsible. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Hmm eugenicsy smell about here? Absolutely. I wanted to see how far the thread went before the parallels became apparent. It was fairly obvious that was the angle you were going for. It's not about that - it's about taking responsibility. I think you think you are on the other thread. " Nah, same shit different colour. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is parenting a right ? Is it time for society to control who can be and can't be parents ? How do people train to be parents ? What's the minimum qualification you think a parent should hold ?" Put it this way, if you think there should be tests, qualifications and training then the government is the last organisation on earth you want designed that system... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"hardest job in the world being a parent" Nah...piece of piss. Mummy may I...? No! Why? Because I'm the mother and I said so!" Doddle! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"kids having kids is a large part of the problem .too many teenage mums who are not mature enough to cope and have partners who absolve themselves of all responasability leaving the poor girl to bring up the child with a succession of inadequate "boyfriends " who flee at the first sign of pressure and responsibility . unfortunatly thier children are now having children and making the same mistakes so the poor parenting continues . welcome to modern britain " There are also some fantastic teenage mums and not all parents over 20/30/40 are brilliant. It's a cross section across all ages. I've met brilliant single teenage mothers who's children are a credit to them. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"how do you decide who can be a parent how do you know if somebody will be a good parent or a bad one till they have had kids? Hypothetically - We eduacate them through schooling and test them at an appropriate age ... let's say 25. If you don't get a first .... no kids most round here are grandparents by that age so true It always makes me laugh at the amount of people who are utterly shocked that I have two daughters in their 20s and no grandkids, it's never been known round here " I have three daughters: 24, 28 and 32. My eldest has been married three years and expecting twins later this year. Some of my friends, younger than me, with children younger than mine are great grand parents! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"there are some terrible parents that should never ever, ever have had children...... but they had them, we need to do everything we can to help the children, they didn't ask to be born to them. " Amen to that. Sadly, sometimes you just know the poor kid doesn't stand a chance! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is parenting a right ? Is it time for society to control who can be and can't be parents ? How do people train to be parents ? What's the minimum qualification you think a parent should hold ?" Ever thought of moving To China. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How on earth do you define what a good parent is? I've known young teen parents that have a huge amount of time and love for their children and also have some of the most politest children I have met. On the other hand some "middle class" parents have unruly rude children that live on chicken nuggets and chips and certainly no table manners because they never eat with their parents. I do hate the way these debates all two quickly become teen mum bashing threads - btw I wasn't a teen mum. Anyway to the original point parenting is a huge learning curve I don't think it could ever successfully be taught. Looking at past and present politicians should they really be introducing and policing such a policy when you don't have to look far to name alcoholics, drug users, adulterers, racists and paedophiles not to mention David Cameron who left his daughter behind ay the pub?? " I don't think good parenting can be taught as such. More of a role model situation. But also dependent on the person. -Some people with shit parents have gone on to be fantastic parents themselves. Determined to be better than their own. Other people use their bad parents as some sort of excuse to be crap people. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"On reason for bad parents is society’s and government’s _iew that everyone should be working. Children need at least one parent at home, if both parents, or even the single parent (in a one parent family) is working the child is missing out. This simple fact has been proven time and time again since the 1950s when more and more households had both parents working. The cost to society when both parents work is far greater than what it would cost to pay the stay at home parent to stay at home. However current thinking dubs them as scroungers. Because of that simple fact society pays, it is time to wake up and smell the coffee. " Nope.......both my parents worked, I never missed out. I have always worked........quality time not quantity of time is the key! Yeah we've missed out sometimes, usually things like the odd sports day and things but it's taught my kids about not being able to do everything you want, you have to work for what you've got and all that. It's ok tho cos I work in the NHS and I hear a rumour that Jeremy wants us to be a 24/7 service (funny cos I've been working 24/7 shifts for 10 years!) as mon-fri is archaic non flexible and not in with current times....... so I'm just waiting for him to announce the same for schooling ) looking forward to spending some time with my kids when I'm off thru the week and then sending them to school on the weekend #idiot | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is parenting a right ? Is it time for society to control who can be and can't be parents ? How do people train to be parents ? What's the minimum qualification you think a parent should hold ?" Just realised I didn't really answer the original questions, apologies so.... Yes No Their parents primarily And a PHD of course | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is parenting a right ? Is it time for society to control who can be and can't be parents ? How do people train to be parents ? What's the minimum qualification you think a parent should hold ? Ever thought of moving To China. " No. I don't agree with their policies on parenting and family size. Do you ? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"and there are some terrible children that when they grown are fucking shocking to their elderly parents......" Sadly, that too. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is parenting a right ? Is it time for society to control who can be and can't be parents ? How do people train to be parents ? What's the minimum qualification you think a parent should hold ?" Thought provoking as ever G.C. Hope it always remains a right. Shame about the posters who don't know the difference between a question and a statement. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You mean almost like china? Like 1 kid per family lol." Forced abortion is lol? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's too short a jump to eugenics, once we determine who should and should have kids. And those interests were largely curtailed when Hitler had been in power. I do think some parenting classes could be useful, covering some of the points raised here. With people being able to freely move through the EU, I'm not sure who would manage, deliver and control such a system. Also, our government is implementing a reduction in the size of the state, so this would be contrary to this. And expect it to have to be paid for. Perhaps by taxed unhealthy kids food? Overall, you can't control parenthood and rights to have children, whilst not expecting other freedoms and rights to not be curtailed too. Dictatorship run countries - yes, but not in democracies with liberty. " I know what you are saying. Unfortunately I used to have a job where I'd see women that were, for want of a batter phrase, crack whores. They seemed perpetually pregnant and giving birth to babies born with a crack addiction. Would I like them to be stopped from having children - emotionally yes. But the rational side of me knows what a slippery slope that is. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's too short a jump to eugenics, once we determine who should and should have kids. And those interests were largely curtailed when Hitler had been in power. I do think some parenting classes could be useful, covering some of the points raised here. With people being able to freely move through the EU, I'm not sure who would manage, deliver and control such a system. Also, our government is implementing a reduction in the size of the state, so this would be contrary to this. And expect it to have to be paid for. Perhaps by taxed unhealthy kids food? Overall, you can't control parenthood and rights to have children, whilst not expecting other freedoms and rights to not be curtailed too. Dictatorship run countries - yes, but not in democracies with liberty. I know what you are saying. Unfortunately I used to have a job where I'd see women that were, for want of a batter phrase, crack whores. They seemed perpetually pregnant and giving birth to babies born with a crack addiction. Would I like them to be stopped from having children - emotionally yes. But the rational side of me knows what a slippery slope that is. " Some people don't deserve kids especially people like that who just have kids for fun off it. But that doesn't mean some drug addics get pregnant then totally turn their life around for the sake of their baby n make brilliant parents but of they had to do some sort of test they would have failed x | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How on earth do you define what a good parent is? I've known young teen parents that have a huge amount of time and love for their children and also have some of the most politest children I have met. On the other hand some "middle class" parents have unruly rude children that live on chicken nuggets and chips and certainly no table manners because they never eat with their parents. I do hate the way these debates all two quickly become teen mum bashing threads - btw I wasn't a teen mum. Anyway to the original point parenting is a huge learning curve I don't think it could ever successfully be taught. Looking at past and present politicians should they really be introducing and policing such a policy when you don't have to look far to name alcoholics, drug users, adulterers, racists and paedophiles not to mention David Cameron who left his daughter behind ay the pub?? I don't think good parenting can be taught as such. More of a role model situation. But also dependent on the person. -Some people with shit parents have gone on to be fantastic parents themselves. Determined to be better than their own. Other people use their bad parents as some sort of excuse to be crap people. " I also hate teenage parent bashing as I was pregnant at 16 and had my son at 16, saying that I think 16 is far too young to have a child, at 16 you have just left school with a few years to enjoy and experience life so you can pass those experiences onto your children. Having said that we raised a very good child who has gone into uni with top grades! We always supported him to do the things we never had the opportunity to do to, and I was determined he wouldn't have the upbringing that I had! There's good and bad stories all over but don't just assume a teenage pregnancy is to get out of work and get free council house, yes some do but not all!!! I am thankful for my some is more careful than I was otherwise I would have been a grandmother at 32!! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's too short a jump to eugenics, once we determine who should and should have kids. And those interests were largely curtailed when Hitler had been in power. I do think some parenting classes could be useful, covering some of the points raised here. With people being able to freely move through the EU, I'm not sure who would manage, deliver and control such a system. Also, our government is implementing a reduction in the size of the state, so this would be contrary to this. And expect it to have to be paid for. Perhaps by taxed unhealthy kids food? Overall, you can't control parenthood and rights to have children, whilst not expecting other freedoms and rights to not be curtailed too. Dictatorship run countries - yes, but not in democracies with liberty. I know what you are saying. Unfortunately I used to have a job where I'd see women that were, for want of a batter phrase, crack whores. They seemed perpetually pregnant and giving birth to babies born with a crack addiction. Would I like them to be stopped from having children - emotionally yes. But the rational side of me knows what a slippery slope that is. " It would be a lovely thought if they could be removed and implanted into a suragate to not endure withdrawal at birth! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't think anyone has the right to criticise others unless they have proven to be great parents themselves." Rather fuzzy logic there. You don't need to run your own restaurant to know the difference between a good and a bad one! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't think anyone should be a parent without completing a course! ....actually that was half joke, half truth. ...I couldn't believe when my neighbour didn't know what to do when her daughter scalded herself and glad I was in when she knocked on my door. Why aren't parents given basic first aid knowledgeduring ante natal Rather than concentrating on their birthing plans,that go out the window anyway How do we deal with human rights arguements etc ? I don't care about human rights. Surely each child has a right to be looked after and cared for? That has to come before any human right? " Agree | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't think anyone has the right to criticise others unless they have proven to be great parents themselves. Rather fuzzy logic there. You don't need to run your own restaurant to know the difference between a good and a bad one! " Agree to this also | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't think anyone has the right to criticise others unless they have proven to be great parents themselves. Rather fuzzy logic there. You don't need to run your own restaurant to know the difference between a good and a bad one! " Re-read what I said please, extreme cases aside. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't think anyone has the right to criticise others unless they have proven to be great parents themselves. Rather fuzzy logic there. You don't need to run your own restaurant to know the difference between a good and a bad one! Re-read what I said please, extreme cases aside. " The logic is the same whether it's extreme cases or not. You don't need to run your own restaurant to criticise a restaurant that has sloppy service but isn't extremely bad. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is parenting a right ? Is it time for society to control who can be and can't be parents ? How do people train to be parents ? What's the minimum qualification you think a parent should hold ?" Eugenics? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't think anyone has the right to criticise others unless they have proven to be great parents themselves. Rather fuzzy logic there. You don't need to run your own restaurant to know the difference between a good and a bad one! Re-read what I said please, extreme cases aside. The logic is the same whether it's extreme cases or not. You don't need to run your own restaurant to criticise a restaurant that has sloppy service but isn't extremely bad. " I apologise, probably not very clear the way I stated that, I understand what you are saying, but what I mean is people are very critical of a lot of parents on their failings, and not able to see their successes, I struggle as a single parent and run myself into the ground, but people will make an assumption of my whole parenting skills,based on a few failings, these people either don't have kids themselves, or, are self righteous and never spend time with their kids, they think supplying lots of money is the sign of a good parent, It really angers and upsets me at times, there are obvious cases of bad parenting, but some people just need some help, and a lot of people prefer to point the finger rather than offer help, my family and so called friends fall into this category. Sorry for my fuzzy logic, lol. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I see lots of parents in my job and think most people are trying their best with what they have. Oftentimes they dont know any better ... and that is not me being patronising. I am a single parent too, and my oldest had severe behaviour problems from his early teens. He is now travelling with a place at univ to come back to next her, if he does. There are some extreme cases of bad parenting our there, but in my opinion, if it concerns you, you should do something about it ... I don't mean only reporting it but also getting involved in supporting others or in supporting children. Too many people say its just about the parents when its about every one of us ...." | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't think anyone has the right to criticise others unless they have proven to be great parents themselves. Rather fuzzy logic there. You don't need to run your own restaurant to know the difference between a good and a bad one! Re-read what I said please, extreme cases aside. The logic is the same whether it's extreme cases or not. You don't need to run your own restaurant to criticise a restaurant that has sloppy service but isn't extremely bad. I apologise, probably not very clear the way I stated that, I understand what you are saying, but what I mean is people are very critical of a lot of parents on their failings, and not able to see their successes, I struggle as a single parent and run myself into the ground, but people will make an assumption of my whole parenting skills,based on a few failings, these people either don't have kids themselves, or, are self righteous and never spend time with their kids, they think supplying lots of money is the sign of a good parent, It really angers and upsets me at times, there are obvious cases of bad parenting, but some people just need some help, and a lot of people prefer to point the finger rather than offer help, my family and so called friends fall into this category. Sorry for my fuzzy logic, lol. Well I agree with all that. You're alluding to very common biases in human psychology. Selection bias - seeing another parent do something and assuming that sample of 1 event represents their overall parenting skills. Confirmation bias - once someone had decided someone else is a "bad parent" then everything you do will be interpreted as supporting evidence. The halo effect - their own failures will be explained away by circumstances and external events. I'm not saying it's ok, it is what it is. I think what we agree on is that most people are, by nature, hypocritical and unaware of it. However, criticism from a hypocrite is as factually valid as anyone's, it's just ultra annoying. I think they have the right to say it, as long as they don't mind you giving them a reminder of their own failings back. In other words, don't dish it out if you can't take it. I think a world where we all take it is better than an ultra PC world where nobody can dish it out. " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Well I agree with all that. You're alluding to very common biases in human psychology. Selection bias - seeing another parent do something and assuming that sample of 1 event represents their overall parenting skills. Confirmation bias - once someone had decided someone else is a "bad parent" then everything you do will be interpreted as supporting evidence. The halo effect - their own failures will be explained away by circumstances and external events. I'm not saying it's ok, it is what it is. I think what we agree on is that most people are, by nature, hypocritical and unaware of it. However, criticism from a hypocrite is as factually valid as anyone's, it's just ultra annoying. I think they have the right to say it, as long as they don't mind you giving them a reminder of their own failings back. In other words, don't dish it out if you can't take it. I think a world where we all take it is better than an ultra PC world where nobody can dish it out." Maybe a world that is more compassionate, where people don't feel the need to behave like that anyway. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Well I agree with all that. You're alluding to very common biases in human psychology. Selection bias - seeing another parent do something and assuming that sample of 1 event represents their overall parenting skills. Confirmation bias - once someone had decided someone else is a "bad parent" then everything you do will be interpreted as supporting evidence. The halo effect - their own failures will be explained away by circumstances and external events. I'm not saying it's ok, it is what it is. I think what we agree on is that most people are, by nature, hypocritical and unaware of it. However, criticism from a hypocrite is as factually valid as anyone's, it's just ultra annoying. I think they have the right to say it, as long as they don't mind you giving them a reminder of their own failings back. In other words, don't dish it out if you can't take it. I think a world where we all take it is better than an ultra PC world where nobody can dish it out. Maybe a world that is more compassionate, where people don't feel the need to behave like that anyway." I know what you are saying but apparently 820,000 kids a week turn up to school without having had breakfast. That's not ok! Before anyone says it, lack of finances were not the #1 cause identified in the report. Those parents need to be told that's not ok, even by people who make unrelated parenting mistakes (e.g. not spending enough time with their kids) | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Well I agree with all that. You're alluding to very common biases in human psychology. Selection bias - seeing another parent do something and assuming that sample of 1 event represents their overall parenting skills. Confirmation bias - once someone had decided someone else is a "bad parent" then everything you do will be interpreted as supporting evidence. The halo effect - their own failures will be explained away by circumstances and external events. I'm not saying it's ok, it is what it is. I think what we agree on is that most people are, by nature, hypocritical and unaware of it. However, criticism from a hypocrite is as factually valid as anyone's, it's just ultra annoying. I think they have the right to say it, as long as they don't mind you giving them a reminder of their own failings back. In other words, don't dish it out if you can't take it. I think a world where we all take it is better than an ultra PC world where nobody can dish it out. Maybe a world that is more compassionate, where people don't feel the need to behave like that anyway. I know what you are saying but apparently 820,000 kids a week turn up to school without having had breakfast. That's not ok! Before anyone says it, lack of finances were not the #1 cause identified in the report. Those parents need to be told that's not ok, even by people who make unrelated parenting mistakes (e.g. not spending enough time with their kids) " I agree children need protecting, and some things need pointing out, were they all due to parental neglect, or did some kids refuse breakfast? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Well I agree with all that. You're alluding to very common biases in human psychology. Selection bias - seeing another parent do something and assuming that sample of 1 event represents their overall parenting skills. Confirmation bias - once someone had decided someone else is a "bad parent" then everything you do will be interpreted as supporting evidence. The halo effect - their own failures will be explained away by circumstances and external events. I'm not saying it's ok, it is what it is. I think what we agree on is that most people are, by nature, hypocritical and unaware of it. However, criticism from a hypocrite is as factually valid as anyone's, it's just ultra annoying. I think they have the right to say it, as long as they don't mind you giving them a reminder of their own failings back. In other words, don't dish it out if you can't take it. I think a world where we all take it is better than an ultra PC world where nobody can dish it out. Maybe a world that is more compassionate, where people don't feel the need to behave like that anyway. I know what you are saying but apparently 820,000 kids a week turn up to school without having had breakfast. That's not ok! Before anyone says it, lack of finances were not the #1 cause identified in the report. Those parents need to be told that's not ok, even by people who make unrelated parenting mistakes (e.g. not spending enough time with their kids) " how do you make a child eat breakfast that refuses, taking in mind your on a timescale? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"My oldest told me 'you have done a great job for us financially, but are not always there emotionally' ... made me think, hell, I can't do everything, but he acknowledges I have tried; and at least he can be articulate about it, no not doing awfully with emotional aspects. Its a job, it never stops, but I love being a parent for all the joys it brings .... I never say I am perfect and I think that helps with the dialogue" You may be doing better than you think, I have twin boys with ASD, SLD, OCD and ADHD, a very mixed little bag they make, I do what I can for their physical, psychological and emotional wellbeing, but it's very difficult, I have to rely on local authority help to prevent having them in care, so to have people nit pick about things I don't manage to do is very upsetting. I think people need to understand a parents plight before putting the boot in. Keep going. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Well I agree with all that. You're alluding to very common biases in human psychology. Selection bias - seeing another parent do something and assuming that sample of 1 event represents their overall parenting skills. Confirmation bias - once someone had decided someone else is a "bad parent" then everything you do will be interpreted as supporting evidence. The halo effect - their own failures will be explained away by circumstances and external events. I'm not saying it's ok, it is what it is. I think what we agree on is that most people are, by nature, hypocritical and unaware of it. However, criticism from a hypocrite is as factually valid as anyone's, it's just ultra annoying. I think they have the right to say it, as long as they don't mind you giving them a reminder of their own failings back. In other words, don't dish it out if you can't take it. I think a world where we all take it is better than an ultra PC world where nobody can dish it out. Maybe a world that is more compassionate, where people don't feel the need to behave like that anyway. I know what you are saying but apparently 820,000 kids a week turn up to school without having had breakfast. That's not ok! Before anyone says it, lack of finances were not the #1 cause identified in the report. Those parents need to be told that's not ok, even by people who make unrelated parenting mistakes (e.g. not spending enough time with their kids) how do you make a child eat breakfast that refuses, taking in mind your on a timescale? " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is parenting a right ? Is it time for society to control who can be and can't be parents ? How do people train to be parents ? What's the minimum qualification you think a parent should hold ?" No exactly the opposite. The more society interferes with parenting the less parents take responsibility for their children. Society should but out and allow parents to bring up their children as they have done for thousands of years. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Well I agree with all that. You're alluding to very common biases in human psychology. Selection bias - seeing another parent do something and assuming that sample of 1 event represents their overall parenting skills. Confirmation bias - once someone had decided someone else is a "bad parent" then everything you do will be interpreted as supporting evidence. The halo effect - their own failures will be explained away by circumstances and external events. I'm not saying it's ok, it is what it is. I think what we agree on is that most people are, by nature, hypocritical and unaware of it. However, criticism from a hypocrite is as factually valid as anyone's, it's just ultra annoying. I think they have the right to say it, as long as they don't mind you giving them a reminder of their own failings back. In other words, don't dish it out if you can't take it. I think a world where we all take it is better than an ultra PC world where nobody can dish it out. Maybe a world that is more compassionate, where people don't feel the need to behave like that anyway. I know what you are saying but apparently 820,000 kids a week turn up to school without having had breakfast. That's not ok! Before anyone says it, lack of finances were not the #1 cause identified in the report. Those parents need to be told that's not ok, even by people who make unrelated parenting mistakes (e.g. not spending enough time with their kids) how do you make a child eat breakfast that refuses, taking in mind your on a timescale? " Have them take it with them, or tell the teachers they have not had any that morning. Send them in with something healthy to snack on .... perhaps not a mars bar, not saying you do, but I have seen it, or kids coming in with blue lips and tongue, courtesy of what they had for breakfast that morning on the way to school. When we lived in the USA drive through breakfasts were a godsend ... pancakes and syrup with orange juice or breakfast burrito for 19 cents, ie scrambled egg in a wrap. That was a while ago, but the kids loved it ... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Well I agree with all that. You're alluding to very common biases in human psychology. Selection bias - seeing another parent do something and assuming that sample of 1 event represents their overall parenting skills. Confirmation bias - once someone had decided someone else is a "bad parent" then everything you do will be interpreted as supporting evidence. The halo effect - their own failures will be explained away by circumstances and external events. I'm not saying it's ok, it is what it is. I think what we agree on is that most people are, by nature, hypocritical and unaware of it. However, criticism from a hypocrite is as factually valid as anyone's, it's just ultra annoying. I think they have the right to say it, as long as they don't mind you giving them a reminder of their own failings back. In other words, don't dish it out if you can't take it. I think a world where we all take it is better than an ultra PC world where nobody can dish it out. Maybe a world that is more compassionate, where people don't feel the need to behave like that anyway. I know what you are saying but apparently 820,000 kids a week turn up to school without having had breakfast. That's not ok! Before anyone says it, lack of finances were not the #1 cause identified in the report. Those parents need to be told that's not ok, even by people who make unrelated parenting mistakes (e.g. not spending enough time with their kids) how do you make a child eat breakfast that refuses, taking in mind your on a timescale? Have them take it with them, or tell the teachers they have not had any that morning. Send them in with something healthy to snack on .... perhaps not a mars bar, not saying you do, but I have seen it, or kids coming in with blue lips and tongue, courtesy of what they had for breakfast that morning on the way to school. When we lived in the USA drive through breakfasts were a godsend ... pancakes and syrup with orange juice or breakfast burrito for 19 cents, ie scrambled egg in a wrap. That was a while ago, but the kids loved it ..." they where saying its wrong for them to turn up to school without having breakfast, so my question still stands. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is parenting a right ? Is it time for society to control who can be and can't be parents ? How do people train to be parents ? What's the minimum qualification you think a parent should hold ?" PhD in Particle Physics; 'cause kids behave like Quarks | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Well I agree with all that. You're alluding to very common biases in human psychology. Selection bias - seeing another parent do something and assuming that sample of 1 event represents their overall parenting skills. Confirmation bias - once someone had decided someone else is a "bad parent" then everything you do will be interpreted as supporting evidence. The halo effect - their own failures will be explained away by circumstances and external events. I'm not saying it's ok, it is what it is. I think what we agree on is that most people are, by nature, hypocritical and unaware of it. However, criticism from a hypocrite is as factually valid as anyone's, it's just ultra annoying. I think they have the right to say it, as long as they don't mind you giving them a reminder of their own failings back. In other words, don't dish it out if you can't take it. I think a world where we all take it is better than an ultra PC world where nobody can dish it out. Maybe a world that is more compassionate, where people don't feel the need to behave like that anyway. I know what you are saying but apparently 820,000 kids a week turn up to school without having had breakfast. That's not ok! Before anyone says it, lack of finances were not the #1 cause identified in the report. Those parents need to be told that's not ok, even by people who make unrelated parenting mistakes (e.g. not spending enough time with their kids) how do you make a child eat breakfast that refuses, taking in mind your on a timescale? Have them take it with them, or tell the teachers they have not had any that morning. Send them in with something healthy to snack on .... perhaps not a mars bar, not saying you do, but I have seen it, or kids coming in with blue lips and tongue, courtesy of what they had for breakfast that morning on the way to school. When we lived in the USA drive through breakfasts were a godsend ... pancakes and syrup with orange juice or breakfast burrito for 19 cents, ie scrambled egg in a wrap. That was a while ago, but the kids loved it ...they where saying its wrong for them to turn up to school without having breakfast, so my question still stands." One of my lads sometimes refuses to eat breakfast, doesn't harm him, and I can't force feed him, but I always make it available for him, things are not as cut and dry as some people like to think. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Well I agree with all that. You're alluding to very common biases in human psychology. Selection bias - seeing another parent do something and assuming that sample of 1 event represents their overall parenting skills. Confirmation bias - once someone had decided someone else is a "bad parent" then everything you do will be interpreted as supporting evidence. The halo effect - their own failures will be explained away by circumstances and external events. I'm not saying it's ok, it is what it is. I think what we agree on is that most people are, by nature, hypocritical and unaware of it. However, criticism from a hypocrite is as factually valid as anyone's, it's just ultra annoying. I think they have the right to say it, as long as they don't mind you giving them a reminder of their own failings back. In other words, don't dish it out if you can't take it. I think a world where we all take it is better than an ultra PC world where nobody can dish it out. Maybe a world that is more compassionate, where people don't feel the need to behave like that anyway. I know what you are saying but apparently 820,000 kids a week turn up to school without having had breakfast. That's not ok! Before anyone says it, lack of finances were not the #1 cause identified in the report. Those parents need to be told that's not ok, even by people who make unrelated parenting mistakes (e.g. not spending enough time with their kids) how do you make a child eat breakfast that refuses, taking in mind your on a timescale? Have them take it with them, or tell the teachers they have not had any that morning. Send them in with something healthy to snack on .... perhaps not a mars bar, not saying you do, but I have seen it, or kids coming in with blue lips and tongue, courtesy of what they had for breakfast that morning on the way to school. When we lived in the USA drive through breakfasts were a godsend ... pancakes and syrup with orange juice or breakfast burrito for 19 cents, ie scrambled egg in a wrap. That was a while ago, but the kids loved it ...they where saying its wrong for them to turn up to school without having breakfast, so my question still stands." they weren't taking into account those that either take it with them or go to breakfast clubs, they where saying its wrong to leave the house without breakfast | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Well I agree with all that. You're alluding to very common biases in human psychology. Selection bias - seeing another parent do something and assuming that sample of 1 event represents their overall parenting skills. Confirmation bias - once someone had decided someone else is a "bad parent" then everything you do will be interpreted as supporting evidence. The halo effect - their own failures will be explained away by circumstances and external events. I'm not saying it's ok, it is what it is. I think what we agree on is that most people are, by nature, hypocritical and unaware of it. However, criticism from a hypocrite is as factually valid as anyone's, it's just ultra annoying. I think they have the right to say it, as long as they don't mind you giving them a reminder of their own failings back. In other words, don't dish it out if you can't take it. I think a world where we all take it is better than an ultra PC world where nobody can dish it out. Maybe a world that is more compassionate, where people don't feel the need to behave like that anyway. I know what you are saying but apparently 820,000 kids a week turn up to school without having had breakfast. That's not ok! Before anyone says it, lack of finances were not the #1 cause identified in the report. Those parents need to be told that's not ok, even by people who make unrelated parenting mistakes (e.g. not spending enough time with their kids) how do you make a child eat breakfast that refuses, taking in mind your on a timescale? Have them take it with them, or tell the teachers they have not had any that morning. Send them in with something healthy to snack on .... perhaps not a mars bar, not saying you do, but I have seen it, or kids coming in with blue lips and tongue, courtesy of what they had for breakfast that morning on the way to school. When we lived in the USA drive through breakfasts were a godsend ... pancakes and syrup with orange juice or breakfast burrito for 19 cents, ie scrambled egg in a wrap. That was a while ago, but the kids loved it ...they where saying its wrong for them to turn up to school without having breakfast, so my question still stands.they weren't taking into account those that either take it with them or go to breakfast clubs, they where saying its wrong to leave the house without breakfast" I know, this is what I'm talking about, not seeing the whole picture. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Well I agree with all that. You're alluding to very common biases in human psychology. Selection bias - seeing another parent do something and assuming that sample of 1 event represents their overall parenting skills. Confirmation bias - once someone had decided someone else is a "bad parent" then everything you do will be interpreted as supporting evidence. The halo effect - their own failures will be explained away by circumstances and external events. I'm not saying it's ok, it is what it is. I think what we agree on is that most people are, by nature, hypocritical and unaware of it. However, criticism from a hypocrite is as factually valid as anyone's, it's just ultra annoying. I think they have the right to say it, as long as they don't mind you giving them a reminder of their own failings back. In other words, don't dish it out if you can't take it. I think a world where we all take it is better than an ultra PC world where nobody can dish it out. Maybe a world that is more compassionate, where people don't feel the need to behave like that anyway. I know what you are saying but apparently 820,000 kids a week turn up to school without having had breakfast. That's not ok! Before anyone says it, lack of finances were not the #1 cause identified in the report. Those parents need to be told that's not ok, even by people who make unrelated parenting mistakes (e.g. not spending enough time with their kids) how do you make a child eat breakfast that refuses, taking in mind your on a timescale? Have them take it with them, or tell the teachers they have not had any that morning. Send them in with something healthy to snack on .... perhaps not a mars bar, not saying you do, but I have seen it, or kids coming in with blue lips and tongue, courtesy of what they had for breakfast that morning on the way to school. When we lived in the USA drive through breakfasts were a godsend ... pancakes and syrup with orange juice or breakfast burrito for 19 cents, ie scrambled egg in a wrap. That was a while ago, but the kids loved it ...they where saying its wrong for them to turn up to school without having breakfast, so my question still stands.they weren't taking into account those that either take it with them or go to breakfast clubs, they where saying its wrong to leave the house without breakfast I know, this is what I'm talking about, not seeing the whole picture." Sorry to let the facts get in the way of a romantic story but if you actually read the report that the 820,000 figure comes from you'd see that #1 reason for not giving the children breakfast was "parental apathy". Not refusal to eat, not lack of funds. That is to say that the report explicitly mentions that plenty of primary school kids didn't get breakfast because the parents weren't awake in time to make it for them. The breakfast clubs were set up because children were fainting and falling asleep in class. Sorry if that upsets the PC brigade. My point is simply that if a child is fainting in a classroom, you don't need to be parent of the year to say something and according to the report it's not so rare. I didn't realise that would be so contraversial. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Well I agree with all that. You're alluding to very common biases in human psychology. Selection bias - seeing another parent do something and assuming that sample of 1 event represents their overall parenting skills. Confirmation bias - once someone had decided someone else is a "bad parent" then everything you do will be interpreted as supporting evidence. The halo effect - their own failures will be explained away by circumstances and external events. I'm not saying it's ok, it is what it is. I think what we agree on is that most people are, by nature, hypocritical and unaware of it. However, criticism from a hypocrite is as factually valid as anyone's, it's just ultra annoying. I think they have the right to say it, as long as they don't mind you giving them a reminder of their own failings back. In other words, don't dish it out if you can't take it. I think a world where we all take it is better than an ultra PC world where nobody can dish it out." | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"how do you decide who can be a parent how do you know if somebody will be a good parent or a bad one till they have had kids? Hypothetically - We eduacate them through schooling and test them at an appropriate age ... let's say 25. If you don't get a first .... no kids " I blame the Grannies | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Well I agree with all that. You're alluding to very common biases in human psychology. Selection bias - seeing another parent do something and assuming that sample of 1 event represents their overall parenting skills. Confirmation bias - once someone had decided someone else is a "bad parent" then everything you do will be interpreted as supporting evidence. The halo effect - their own failures will be explained away by circumstances and external events. I'm not saying it's ok, it is what it is. I think what we agree on is that most people are, by nature, hypocritical and unaware of it. However, criticism from a hypocrite is as factually valid as anyone's, it's just ultra annoying. I think they have the right to say it, as long as they don't mind you giving them a reminder of their own failings back. In other words, don't dish it out if you can't take it. I think a world where we all take it is better than an ultra PC world where nobody can dish it out. Maybe a world that is more compassionate, where people don't feel the need to behave like that anyway. I know what you are saying but apparently 820,000 kids a week turn up to school without having had breakfast. That's not ok! Before anyone says it, lack of finances were not the #1 cause identified in the report. Those parents need to be told that's not ok, even by people who make unrelated parenting mistakes (e.g. not spending enough time with their kids) how do you make a child eat breakfast that refuses, taking in mind your on a timescale? Have them take it with them, or tell the teachers they have not had any that morning. Send them in with something healthy to snack on .... perhaps not a mars bar, not saying you do, but I have seen it, or kids coming in with blue lips and tongue, courtesy of what they had for breakfast that morning on the way to school. When we lived in the USA drive through breakfasts were a godsend ... pancakes and syrup with orange juice or breakfast burrito for 19 cents, ie scrambled egg in a wrap. That was a while ago, but the kids loved it ...they where saying its wrong for them to turn up to school without having breakfast, so my question still stands.they weren't taking into account those that either take it with them or go to breakfast clubs, they where saying its wrong to leave the house without breakfast I know, this is what I'm talking about, not seeing the whole picture. Sorry to let the facts get in the way of a romantic story but if you actually read the report that the 820,000 figure comes from you'd see that #1 reason for not giving the children breakfast was "parental apathy". Not refusal to eat, not lack of funds. That is to say that the report explicitly mentions that plenty of primary school kids didn't get breakfast because the parents weren't awake in time to make it for them. The breakfast clubs were set up because children were fainting and falling asleep in class. Sorry if that upsets the PC brigade. My point is simply that if a child is fainting in a classroom, you don't need to be parent of the year to say something and according to the report it's not so rare. I didn't realise that would be so contraversial. " What does 'parental apathy' mean though, just 'I cant be bothered' or are ignorant about how important breakfast is ... both parents, one parents, I would be wary of such terminology as there is an implied judgement there which doesn't suggest anything helpful ... I have sent my kids to school without breakfast ... they are teenagers now and two have left school ... they can eat at school. I leave home before seven and don't get back until afterwards, but how would someone find out if, when they had gone to school without eating, if it was because of my apathy? I would always prefer them to eat rather than feed myself, and indeed lived like that for two years trying to get our of debt when their dad left ... we were on super noodles for all that time. But if someone had asked me why I didn't feed them properly, I wonder what I would have said ... I think its better to look for solutions ... so what can you do about that apathy? Just asking in general, for ideas? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Well I agree with all that. You're alluding to very common biases in human psychology. Selection bias - seeing another parent do something and assuming that sample of 1 event represents their overall parenting skills. Confirmation bias - once someone had decided someone else is a "bad parent" then everything you do will be interpreted as supporting evidence. The halo effect - their own failures will be explained away by circumstances and external events. I'm not saying it's ok, it is what it is. I think what we agree on is that most people are, by nature, hypocritical and unaware of it. However, criticism from a hypocrite is as factually valid as anyone's, it's just ultra annoying. I think they have the right to say it, as long as they don't mind you giving them a reminder of their own failings back. In other words, don't dish it out if you can't take it. I think a world where we all take it is better than an ultra PC world where nobody can dish it out. Maybe a world that is more compassionate, where people don't feel the need to behave like that anyway. I know what you are saying but apparently 820,000 kids a week turn up to school without having had breakfast. That's not ok! Before anyone says it, lack of finances were not the #1 cause identified in the report. Those parents need to be told that's not ok, even by people who make unrelated parenting mistakes (e.g. not spending enough time with their kids) how do you make a child eat breakfast that refuses, taking in mind your on a timescale? Have them take it with them, or tell the teachers they have not had any that morning. Send them in with something healthy to snack on .... perhaps not a mars bar, not saying you do, but I have seen it, or kids coming in with blue lips and tongue, courtesy of what they had for breakfast that morning on the way to school. When we lived in the USA drive through breakfasts were a godsend ... pancakes and syrup with orange juice or breakfast burrito for 19 cents, ie scrambled egg in a wrap. That was a while ago, but the kids loved it ...they where saying its wrong for them to turn up to school without having breakfast, so my question still stands.they weren't taking into account those that either take it with them or go to breakfast clubs, they where saying its wrong to leave the house without breakfast I know, this is what I'm talking about, not seeing the whole picture. Sorry to let the facts get in the way of a romantic story but if you actually read the report that the 820,000 figure comes from you'd see that #1 reason for not giving the children breakfast was "parental apathy". Not refusal to eat, not lack of funds. That is to say that the report explicitly mentions that plenty of primary school kids didn't get breakfast because the parents weren't awake in time to make it for them. The breakfast clubs were set up because children were fainting and falling asleep in class. Sorry if that upsets the PC brigade. My point is simply that if a child is fainting in a classroom, you don't need to be parent of the year to say something and according to the report it's not so rare. I didn't realise that would be so contraversial. " What about the brigade who offer up statistics and reports that condemn, but never seem to offer positive and practical solutions to the problem, other than punishment that comes into place when it's too late? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Well I agree with all that. You're alluding to very common biases in human psychology. Selection bias - seeing another parent do something and assuming that sample of 1 event represents their overall parenting skills. Confirmation bias - once someone had decided someone else is a "bad parent" then everything you do will be interpreted as supporting evidence. The halo effect - their own failures will be explained away by circumstances and external events. I'm not saying it's ok, it is what it is. I think what we agree on is that most people are, by nature, hypocritical and unaware of it. However, criticism from a hypocrite is as factually valid as anyone's, it's just ultra annoying. I think they have the right to say it, as long as they don't mind you giving them a reminder of their own failings back. In other words, don't dish it out if you can't take it. I think a world where we all take it is better than an ultra PC world where nobody can dish it out. Maybe a world that is more compassionate, where people don't feel the need to behave like that anyway. I know what you are saying but apparently 820,000 kids a week turn up to school without having had breakfast. That's not ok! Before anyone says it, lack of finances were not the #1 cause identified in the report. Those parents need to be told that's not ok, even by people who make unrelated parenting mistakes (e.g. not spending enough time with their kids) how do you make a child eat breakfast that refuses, taking in mind your on a timescale? Have them take it with them, or tell the teachers they have not had any that morning. Send them in with something healthy to snack on .... perhaps not a mars bar, not saying you do, but I have seen it, or kids coming in with blue lips and tongue, courtesy of what they had for breakfast that morning on the way to school. When we lived in the USA drive through breakfasts were a godsend ... pancakes and syrup with orange juice or breakfast burrito for 19 cents, ie scrambled egg in a wrap. That was a while ago, but the kids loved it ...they where saying its wrong for them to turn up to school without having breakfast, so my question still stands.they weren't taking into account those that either take it with them or go to breakfast clubs, they where saying its wrong to leave the house without breakfast I know, this is what I'm talking about, not seeing the whole picture. Sorry to let the facts get in the way of a romantic story but if you actually read the report that the 820,000 figure comes from you'd see that #1 reason for not giving the children breakfast was "parental apathy". Not refusal to eat, not lack of funds. That is to say that the report explicitly mentions that plenty of primary school kids didn't get breakfast because the parents weren't awake in time to make it for them. The breakfast clubs were set up because children were fainting and falling asleep in class. Sorry if that upsets the PC brigade. My point is simply that if a child is fainting in a classroom, you don't need to be parent of the year to say something and according to the report it's not so rare. I didn't realise that would be so contraversial. What about the brigade who offer up statistics and reports that condemn, but never seem to offer positive and practical solutions to the problem, other than punishment that comes into place when it's too late?" I am a card carrying member of the PC brigade and I think you will find that most of us are out there trying to make a difference and are actually not judgemental about this because we know what the reality is like for parents who struggle ... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Well I agree with all that. You're alluding to very common biases in human psychology. Selection bias - seeing another parent do something and assuming that sample of 1 event represents their overall parenting skills. Confirmation bias - once someone had decided someone else is a "bad parent" then everything you do will be interpreted as supporting evidence. The halo effect - their own failures will be explained away by circumstances and external events. I'm not saying it's ok, it is what it is. I think what we agree on is that most people are, by nature, hypocritical and unaware of it. However, criticism from a hypocrite is as factually valid as anyone's, it's just ultra annoying. I think they have the right to say it, as long as they don't mind you giving them a reminder of their own failings back. In other words, don't dish it out if you can't take it. I think a world where we all take it is better than an ultra PC world where nobody can dish it out. Maybe a world that is more compassionate, where people don't feel the need to behave like that anyway. I know what you are saying but apparently 820,000 kids a week turn up to school without having had breakfast. That's not ok! Before anyone says it, lack of finances were not the #1 cause identified in the report. Those parents need to be told that's not ok, even by people who make unrelated parenting mistakes (e.g. not spending enough time with their kids) how do you make a child eat breakfast that refuses, taking in mind your on a timescale? Have them take it with them, or tell the teachers they have not had any that morning. Send them in with something healthy to snack on .... perhaps not a mars bar, not saying you do, but I have seen it, or kids coming in with blue lips and tongue, courtesy of what they had for breakfast that morning on the way to school. When we lived in the USA drive through breakfasts were a godsend ... pancakes and syrup with orange juice or breakfast burrito for 19 cents, ie scrambled egg in a wrap. That was a while ago, but the kids loved it ...they where saying its wrong for them to turn up to school without having breakfast, so my question still stands.they weren't taking into account those that either take it with them or go to breakfast clubs, they where saying its wrong to leave the house without breakfast I know, this is what I'm talking about, not seeing the whole picture. Sorry to let the facts get in the way of a romantic story but if you actually read the report that the 820,000 figure comes from you'd see that #1 reason for not giving the children breakfast was "parental apathy". Not refusal to eat, not lack of funds. That is to say that the report explicitly mentions that plenty of primary school kids didn't get breakfast because the parents weren't awake in time to make it for them. The breakfast clubs were set up because children were fainting and falling asleep in class. Sorry if that upsets the PC brigade. My point is simply that if a child is fainting in a classroom, you don't need to be parent of the year to say something and according to the report it's not so rare. I didn't realise that would be so contraversial. What about the brigade who offer up statistics and reports that condemn, but never seem to offer positive and practical solutions to the problem, other than punishment that comes into place when it's too late?" I'm sorry, it's great kids faint in lessons. Totally unavoidable situation. How silly of me. Practical solutions, like ummm pour milk into a bowl of cereal. Yes complicated stuff. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Well I agree with all that. You're alluding to very common biases in human psychology. Selection bias - seeing another parent do something and assuming that sample of 1 event represents their overall parenting skills. Confirmation bias - once someone had decided someone else is a "bad parent" then everything you do will be interpreted as supporting evidence. The halo effect - their own failures will be explained away by circumstances and external events. I'm not saying it's ok, it is what it is. I think what we agree on is that most people are, by nature, hypocritical and unaware of it. However, criticism from a hypocrite is as factually valid as anyone's, it's just ultra annoying. I think they have the right to say it, as long as they don't mind you giving them a reminder of their own failings back. In other words, don't dish it out if you can't take it. I think a world where we all take it is better than an ultra PC world where nobody can dish it out. Maybe a world that is more compassionate, where people don't feel the need to behave like that anyway. I know what you are saying but apparently 820,000 kids a week turn up to school without having had breakfast. That's not ok! Before anyone says it, lack of finances were not the #1 cause identified in the report. Those parents need to be told that's not ok, even by people who make unrelated parenting mistakes (e.g. not spending enough time with their kids) how do you make a child eat breakfast that refuses, taking in mind your on a timescale? Have them take it with them, or tell the teachers they have not had any that morning. Send them in with something healthy to snack on .... perhaps not a mars bar, not saying you do, but I have seen it, or kids coming in with blue lips and tongue, courtesy of what they had for breakfast that morning on the way to school. When we lived in the USA drive through breakfasts were a godsend ... pancakes and syrup with orange juice or breakfast burrito for 19 cents, ie scrambled egg in a wrap. That was a while ago, but the kids loved it ...they where saying its wrong for them to turn up to school without having breakfast, so my question still stands.they weren't taking into account those that either take it with them or go to breakfast clubs, they where saying its wrong to leave the house without breakfast I know, this is what I'm talking about, not seeing the whole picture. Sorry to let the facts get in the way of a romantic story but if you actually read the report that the 820,000 figure comes from you'd see that #1 reason for not giving the children breakfast was "parental apathy". Not refusal to eat, not lack of funds. That is to say that the report explicitly mentions that plenty of primary school kids didn't get breakfast because the parents weren't awake in time to make it for them. The breakfast clubs were set up because children were fainting and falling asleep in class. Sorry if that upsets the PC brigade. My point is simply that if a child is fainting in a classroom, you don't need to be parent of the year to say something and according to the report it's not so rare. I didn't realise that would be so contraversial. What about the brigade who offer up statistics and reports that condemn, but never seem to offer positive and practical solutions to the problem, other than punishment that comes into place when it's too late? I am a card carrying member of the PC brigade and I think you will find that most of us are out there trying to make a difference and are actually not judgemental about this because we know what the reality is like for parents who struggle ..." With you all the way. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Everybody blames the parents. Thats what our society has become. Instead of taking ownership of our failings, we must blame someone else." When you see parents not chastising their kids when they clearly need it, who else is really to blame. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Everybody blames the parents. Thats what our society has become. Instead of taking ownership of our failings, we must blame someone else. When you see parents not chastising their kids when they clearly need it, who else is really to blame." Teachers / the Government / Margaret Thatcher / Society / Illuminati | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Everybody blames the parents. Thats what our society has become. Instead of taking ownership of our failings, we must blame someone else. When you see parents not chastising their kids when they clearly need it, who else is really to blame." What if you chastise the and they ignore you completely, then what? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"all your parents are to be blamed for you lot being on here , you filthy lot of sex mad contestants " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"hardest job in the world being a parent" really? i dont understand why folk say its hard,, maybe i got lucky (or im doing it completely wrong) but ivve found t pretty easy at times, most natural thing in the world | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is parenting a right ? Is it time for society to control who can be and can't be parents ? How do people train to be parents ? What's the minimum qualification you think a parent should hold ?" Maybe controlling who could be parents would be a bit much. Wouldn't it be better,if you could just delete the occasional child. By the time they're 12,you'll have a good idea if they're gonna grow up to be a pure wanker. So just give society,a right to delete the child button. Thus Removing the need for parents to have any qualifications whatsoever. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Is parenting a right ? Is it time for society to control who can be and can't be parents ? How do people train to be parents ? What's the minimum qualification you think a parent should hold ?" Parenting isn't a right. Hence the patchy access to infertility treatment. Society does control who can and can't be parents. Safe guarding steps in for not good-enough parenting, albeit it isn't risk-free. To those who suggest other options compulsory sterilisation etc is a very dangerous game. How do we train to be parents? From our own experiences of parenting. So often, there are flaws in the maps our parents give us. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't think anyone should be a parent without completing a course! ....actually that was half joke, half truth. ...I couldn't believe when my neighbour didn't know what to do when her daughter scalded herself and glad I was in when she knocked on my door. Why aren't parents given basic first aid knowledgeduring ante natal Rather than concentrating on their birthing plans,that go out the window anyway actually that is a great point...people looking after your kids have to be trained in pediatric first aid....why shouldnt parents be required to do the same? " Paediatric first aid should be taught in schools(well the basic stuff) | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't think anyone should be a parent without completing a course! ....actually that was half joke, half truth. ...I couldn't believe when my neighbour didn't know what to do when her daughter scalded herself and glad I was in when she knocked on my door. Why aren't parents given basic first aid knowledgeduring ante natal Rather than concentrating on their birthing plans,that go out the window anyway " I would like to think that a little common sense can be used when dealing with an injured or hurt child, I understand that parents can and do panic. It can't be that common can it, not to do anything when you kid is hurt. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Who decides what good parenting is? We parent very differently to the "norm" and no amount of argument would persuade me to parent in the way society seems to think is the best way (Naughty step, letting children cry themselves to sleep at night, treating children like second class citizens or expecting them to behave like little adults) Science has proved over and over that our way is less damaging for children in the long run and produces well adjusted, emotionally stable young adults, but society refuses to see that. So who decides what "good parenting" is? *Her*" ok total mind fuck... what is 'the norm?' and how do you do it? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Everybody blames the parents. Thats what our society has become. Instead of taking ownership of our failings, we must blame someone else. When you see parents not chastising their kids when they clearly need it, who else is really to blame." What I find worse is when parents are shouting at a crying child and screaming for them to walk faster!! Sometimes I feel like going over to them and trying to calm them down by talking to them. Personally I think some parents just don't have the patience or time to be parents! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |