FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Fab swingers in the Daily Star..

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Anyone else seen this ?

http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/450594/Glastonbury-Festival-sex-mad-swingers

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondjoeMan
over a year ago

Glastonbury

I was gonna say FAB but that's actually pretty shit.

Gutter churnalism at its worst.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

So basically the newspaper steals pics, they can get done for that, at least they had fun there lol.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondjoeMan
over a year ago

Glastonbury


"So basically the newspaper steals pics, they can get done for that, at least they had fun there lol."

So if they printed your antics & pics you'd be happy with that?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"So basically the newspaper steals pics, they can get done for that, at least they had fun there lol.

So if they printed your antics & pics you'd be happy with that?"
No I wouldn't, but didn't they meet the couple?.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondjoeMan
over a year ago

Glastonbury

The 'article' doesn't say that, what it says is that their reporter, Jim, contacted them (so the fucker's floating round on here, or was...) then strung them along.

As I say, a bit shit.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondjoeMan
over a year ago

Glastonbury


"The 'article' doesn't say that, what it says is that their reporter, Jim, contacted them (so the fucker's floating round on here, or was...) then strung them along.

As I say, a bit shit. "

And also a reminder to watch yr back

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"The 'article' doesn't say that, what it says is that their reporter, Jim, contacted them (so the fucker's floating round on here, or was...) then strung them along.

As I say, a bit shit. "
Ah yes I get it now, abit slow there, but yes its still wrong to expose them like that don't you recon?.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"The 'article' doesn't say that, what it says is that their reporter, Jim, contacted them (so the fucker's floating round on here, or was...) then strung them along.

As I say, a bit shit.

And also a reminder to watch yr back"
That's right as well

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icky999Man
over a year ago

warrington

how did we get from studys by sydney university to jim from slough?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *heRainManMan
over a year ago

Warrington & Glasgow

About the level of "journalism" that you'd expect from the tabloids!

But did anyone else find it amusing that immediately below the article there was a link to another titled "Glastonbury Surprise: Libertines rumoured to fill empty Pyramid Stage slot"? That couldn't have been entirely accidental, could it?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *heRainManMan
over a year ago

Warrington & Glasgow

Has that article been changed? I don't see a mention of "Fab"!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondjoeMan
over a year ago

Glastonbury


"Has that article been changed? I don't see a mention of "Fab"!"

It's there in the picture

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"About the level of "journalism" that you'd expect from the tabloids!

But did anyone else find it amusing that immediately below the article there was a link to another titled "Glastonbury Surprise: Libertines rumoured to fill empty Pyramid Stage slot"? That couldn't have been entirely accidental, could it?"

So, our old friend Lib 'slotted' the heavenly pyramid at Glasto, eh?

On ye mate!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondjoeMan
over a year ago

Glastonbury


"Has that article been changed? I don't see a mention of "Fab"!

It's there in the picture"

Along with their user names

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"So, our old friend Lib 'slotted' the heavenly pyramid at Glasto, eh?

On ye mate!! "

I was pretty good to if I do say so myself.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

What did the star hope to gain from that article except to try humiliate a regular couple for no reason?! I'm not saying that we should be ashamed of our fab membership, but people are narrow minded, and that piece of shitty so called journalism is just sensationalised bullshit. I hate tabloids with a passion, scummy worthless f*cks that try to make a buck and scandal out of nothing.

Rant over

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I work with (against) journalists all day.

They are scum.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I work with (against) journalists all day.

They are scum."

Sadface.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I work with (against) journalists all day.

They are scum.

Sadface. "

They're not all scum, just a vast majority seem to be. I'm sure there are some 95% human ones

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lue and RedCouple
over a year ago

Ulverston

So legally where would these people stand? Are the press allowed to publish pictures from this couple without consent?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"So legally where would these people stand? Are the press allowed to publish pictures from this couple without consent? "

The images are in the public domain by being on the internet as far as I know.

Be cautious.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"So legally where would these people stand? Are the press allowed to publish pictures from this couple without consent? "

I was wondering that, if they are on their profile as public pictures, then I would assume so as they are already out in the public domain, albeit the public domain of fab which anyone can join. If they were private pics for friends only, not sure what the stance would be

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Having now read the article, I'd forgotten how bad tabloids are.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ecretlyASoftieWoman
over a year ago

Hull but travel regularly


"So legally where would these people stand? Are the press allowed to publish pictures from this couple without consent?

I was wondering that, if they are on their profile as public pictures, then I would assume so as they are already out in the public domain, albeit the public domain of fab which anyone can join. If they were private pics for friends only, not sure what the stance would be "

The article talks of the journo being messaged pics - if these are private not public and sent by message or text could these fall under the new laws?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"The article talks of the journo being messaged pics - if these are private not public and sent by message or text could these fall under the new laws? "

I very much doubt it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"So, our old friend Lib 'slotted' the heavenly pyramid at Glasto, eh?

On ye mate!!

I was pretty good to if I do say so myself."

Did you sway a lantern to & fro in perfect harmony with the slotting?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The couple are flagged up as "new" with no verifications

And I'm unable to find them through the profile search so perhaps it's a set up story?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Shock horror... couple use specialist members only website to arrange to do something with other members who would also like to do those things behind closed doors and away from the public eye... all without anyone knowing.

That's disgusting!!!! Those perverted exhibitionists... flashing their bits around in utter privacy like that.

What excellent journalism. Next they'll be telling me that some couples get naked when they go to bed... disgusting! absolutely disgusting

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

pic can be used under fare usage rights if its just to be used as running a story about fab

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Shock horror... couple use specialist members only website to arrange to do something with other members who would also like to do those things behind closed doors and away from the public eye... all without anyone knowing.

That's disgusting!!!! Those perverted exhibitionists... flashing their bits around in utter privacy like that.

What excellent journalism. Next they'll be telling me that some couples get naked when they go to bed... disgusting! absolutely disgusting "

Well, seeing as you put it like that.....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iSTARessWoman
over a year ago

London


"The couple are flagged up as "new" with no verifications

And I'm unable to find them through the profile search so perhaps it's a set up story? "

Could well be

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

does it say what he done right to get a meet so easily

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"does it say what he done right to get a meet so easily "

Supposedly they had a large luxury motor home at Glastonbury with a (drum roll)........... SHOWER!!!

Just imagine all the peeps who showed up, had a shower & fucked right off!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Anyone else seen this ?

http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/450594/Glastonbury-Festival-sex-mad-swingers

"

Shows how interested folks are though. Zero FB, Twitter etc likes and no shared links.

People just don't care. It's not news anymore. Not that it ever really was.

B

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Does anyone know the couple? ie are they real or was the profile made up to then create the story? (If that makes sense)

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Does anyone know the couple? ie are they real or was the profile made up to then create the story? (If that makes sense)"

That could so easily be done, as we all know!

This is why I would never, EVER buy a tabloid, even if I had run out of toilet paper, - I'd rather go out & buy a bidet!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Does anyone know the couple? ie are they real or was the profile made up to then create the story? (If that makes sense)

That could so easily be done, as we all know!

This is why I would never, EVER buy a tabloid, even if I had run out of toilet paper, - I'd rather go out & buy a bidet!! "

have you tried swatting flies with a bidet ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Does anyone know the couple? ie are they real or was the profile made up to then create the story? (If that makes sense)

That could so easily be done, as we all know!

This is why I would never, EVER buy a tabloid, even if I had run out of toilet paper, - I'd rather go out & buy a bidet!!

have you tried swatting flies with a bidet ?"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ex_OnTheBeachCouple
over a year ago

kent ( by the seaside )


"does it say what he done right to get a meet so easily "

He pretended that he was a couple

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uckandbunnyCouple
over a year ago

In your bed

So is the next expose going to be a single mum on plenty of fish?

What is the legal premise for this?

They are not famous so no public interest claim.

What did they do to deserve this exposure.

Blurred pics spread nationally did they give permission for republication?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"So is the next expose going to be a single mum on plenty of fish?

What is the legal premise for this?

They are not famous so no public interest claim.

What did they do to deserve this exposure.

Blurred pics spread nationally did they give permission for republication?

"

for a start, legally if you put something in the public domain it is open to fair use. The dumb ass legal warning that people copy n paste offers no protection in law. If you want to spend 10's of thousands on a legal team for a case that you cant win, go ahead. I would imagine that the journalist, ahem, created the jim jane profile themselves and used a photo from their stock.The whole article is i imagine a fiction. face pic tuesday anyone

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Does anyone know the couple? ie are they real or was the profile made up to then create the story? (If that makes sense)

That could so easily be done, as we all know!

This is why I would never, EVER buy a tabloid, even if I had run out of toilet paper, - I'd rather go out & buy a bidet!!

have you tried swatting flies with a bidet ?"

Shit, I didn't really think that through, did I.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ancs MinxWoman
over a year ago

Burnley


"So legally where would these people stand? Are the press allowed to publish pictures from this couple without consent?

The images are in the public domain by being on the internet as far as I know.

Be cautious."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

To be honest it's buried so deep in the Stars pages, amidst countless stories of swinging and sex, that it would hardly raise an eyebrow

After scrolling through their mobile website it would seem that's all the rag is trying to sell nowadays

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *bi HaiveMan
Forum Mod
over a year ago

Cheeseville, Somerset

Keep up folks - this was two weeks ago! Lol

http://m.fabswingers.com/forum/lounge/401039#message_7803875

A

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *andom2chatMan
over a year ago

A Galaxy Far, Far Away & Spain


"So basically the newspaper steals pics, they can get done for that, at least they had fun there lol.

So if they printed your antics & pics you'd be happy with that?"

I'm pretty sure a married CEO of the paper having an affair with his single mum employee would get more attention from the public if I let that out into the public domain. He has much more to lose than I do if they come after me. So come on - take your best shot. What's good for the goose...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *andom2chatMan
over a year ago

A Galaxy Far, Far Away & Spain

Not to mention a certain high ranking closet sub editor who happens to like sex with men.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"So legally where would these people stand? Are the press allowed to publish pictures from this couple without consent?

The images are in the public domain by being on the internet as far as I know.

Be cautious."

m.fabswingers.com/forum/feedback/406080

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"So legally where would these people stand? Are the press allowed to publish pictures from this couple without consent?

The images are in the public domain by being on the internet as far as I know.

Be cautious.

m.fabswingers.com/forum/feedback/406080

"

Fabswingers.com site feedback forum section.

'Stolen photos policy' thread.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arry247Couple
over a year ago

Wakefield


"

for a start, legally if you put something in the public domain it is open to fair use. The dumb ass legal warning that people copy n paste offers no protection in law. If you want to spend 10's of thousands on a legal team for a case that you cant win, go ahead. I would imagine that the journalist, ahem, created the jim jane profile themselves and used a photo from their stock.The whole article is i imagine a fiction. face pic tuesday anyone "

Fab is not in the public domain it is a private members forum.

the Star should have obtained consent to publish the pictures sent to the journalist.

The data protection act protects the pictures and the couples privacy in such cases.

There have been cases of papers losing when they have photographed people in the street entering gyms etc. as it is a breach of their rights.

If the couple are still on Fab perhaps they might comment on whether they gave consent to publish or not, I suspect they did.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

for a start, legally if you put something in the public domain it is open to fair use. The dumb ass legal warning that people copy n paste offers no protection in law. If you want to spend 10's of thousands on a legal team for a case that you cant win, go ahead. I would imagine that the journalist, ahem, created the jim jane profile themselves and used a photo from their stock.The whole article is i imagine a fiction. face pic tuesday anyone

Fab is not in the public domain it is a private members forum.

the Star should have obtained consent to publish the pictures sent to the journalist.

The data protection act protects the pictures and the couples privacy in such cases.

There have been cases of papers losing when they have photographed people in the street entering gyms etc. as it is a breach of their rights.

If the couple are still on Fab perhaps they might comment on whether they gave consent to publish or not, I suspect they did."

If the couple actually existed.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It once again proves that the titillation of the frustrated vanilla world is needed to sell scandal rags.

This journalistic slime is to provide vicarious exitement for those poor individuals who are so indoctrinated with sexually repressive thoughts that they need to read about other peoples sex lives to get a semi-hardon.

The paper needs to balance this article now with one about how a couple have not had sex for 14 years and how the wife has never experienced sexual pleasure.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

for a start, legally if you put something in the public domain it is open to fair use. The dumb ass legal warning that people copy n paste offers no protection in law. If you want to spend 10's of thousands on a legal team for a case that you cant win, go ahead. I would imagine that the journalist, ahem, created the jim jane profile themselves and used a photo from their stock.The whole article is i imagine a fiction. face pic tuesday anyone

Fab is not in the public domain it is a private members forum.

the Star should have obtained consent to publish the pictures sent to the journalist.

The data protection act protects the pictures and the couples privacy in such cases.

There have been cases of papers losing when they have photographed people in the street entering gyms etc. as it is a breach of their rights.

If the couple are still on Fab perhaps they might comment on whether they gave consent to publish or not, I suspect they did."

as far as i am aware fab is not a private members forum. Non users are able to view the site and profiles.

It is not against the law to take photographs of people in a public space.unless of course you are harrassing them or shoving a camera into their face or stopping them from going about their business.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Is it me.... Or is it a coincidence that the pictured profile was 'new'? Could the article be the actual reporter just stooping low to get into press? You may find the reporter himself is a member of fab!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *bi HaiveMan
Forum Mod
over a year ago

Cheeseville, Somerset


"Is it me.... Or is it a coincidence that the pictured profile was 'new'? Could the article be the actual reporter just stooping low to get into press? You may find the reporter himself is a member of fab!!

"

Exactly what I posted two weeks ago.

New profile.

Now gone.

Maybe some pages needed filling with more shite.

A

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *erbyDalesCplCouple
over a year ago

Derbyshire

I think it's disgusting.

To think, people actually listen to aged rockers playing music while having sex.

Sickos

Mr ddc

Ps good bit of advertising?

Pps deffo not sending face pics now!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

O o O oo


"The couple are flagged up as "new" with no verifications

And I'm unable to find them through the profile search so perhaps it's a set up story? "

I thought the same

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inaTitzTV/TS
over a year ago

Titz Towers, North Notts

All seems a bit rum

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rivate auditionsMan
over a year ago

West Midlands

About 4 years ago a new club opened up near spaghetti junction,was on the industrial side of the road backing on to the Bham_Fazeley canal in the shadows of the M6 motorway,one evening some "Newbies" turned up and were mingling chatting to the others there and on sunday the local paper had an "Expose" of a swingers club which had not inteferred with locals living on the other side of the road at all as there was a barrier running down the centre of the road leading cars to the flyover of the M6 & spaghetti junction so no cars were annoyingly parked there but well clear,no one had known it was a swingers club in the previous 12 months it had been there!.

The club then moved to another part of town.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I bet the reporter did that new profile to get a good story.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *izzy RascallMan
over a year ago

Cardiff

Any pictures of the motorhome?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

This article appeared in local paper. Was then copied out yo Star, Mail, Guardian etc..... It's all pretty tame to be fair.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Having now read the article, I'd forgotten how bad tabloids are."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"This article appeared in local paper. Was then copied out yo Star, Mail, Guardian etc..... It's all pretty tame to be fair."

Tame but still wrong

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

if you read the story it sounds more like the guy set up the reporter to get his 40 grand camper in the paper so everyone knows hes got a shower

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"So basically the newspaper steals pics, they can get done for that, at least they had fun there lol.

So if they printed your antics & pics you'd be happy with that?"

Yeah I might get a meet.

If you're worried about being outed you probably shouldn't be on here, because if you think you're doing something wrong, then it's obvious others will too.

Plus who gives a shit if you are a swinger?

"oh but I could lose my job and reputation "

shut up (not you personally) you ain't that important. No one cares.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *litterbabeWoman
over a year ago

hiding from cock pics.


"Any pictures of the motorhome?"

Just Jane " relaxing" inside it..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"So basically the newspaper steals pics, they can get done for that, at least they had fun there lol.

So if they printed your antics & pics you'd be happy with that?

Yeah I might get a meet.

If you're worried about being outed you probably shouldn't be on here, because if you think you're doing something wrong, then it's obvious others will too.

Plus who gives a shit if you are a swinger?

"oh but I could lose my job and reputation "

shut up (not you personally) you ain't that important. No one cares.

"

People have been outed and have lost jobs, family and friends. If you have none of those then that's such a shame.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondjoeMan
over a year ago

Glastonbury

Bottom line: once you put it on t'internet you've lost control of it.

And the internet never forgets!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aeBabeWoman
over a year ago

London


"how did we get from studys by sydney university to jim from slough? "

How do we get you to me?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I'm suggesting for their next article they talk about the moral depravity of porn... followed by a nice gallery of porn photos just to illustrate the point.

Oooo how morally depraved... cor just look at them tits. How awful... where can I find more?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondjoeMan
over a year ago

Glastonbury

It is barely worth the title of 'newspaper'

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It certainly makes it clearer how the debauchery... the depravity... is the journalist's doing. And, in that sense, the terrorism being advertised by tabloids is often their doing too.

Back in the 80's the government banned the IRA from being in the news because they recognised how the media was giving them oxygen. We could do with some enlightened thinking like that again.

Terrorists just kill a few people... it's the media who terrorise entire populations

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Newspapers... making up stories....... no way!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

even more important,

im just back from work

going for a shower

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It certainly makes it clearer how the debauchery... the depravity... is the journalist's doing. And, in that sense, the terrorism being advertised by tabloids is often their doing too.

Back in the 80's the government banned the IRA from being in the news because they recognised how the media was giving them oxygen. We could do with some enlightened thinking like that again.

Terrorists just kill a few people... it's the media who terrorise entire populations "

Agreed. 24hr news channels ramp it up too. A bit like the 7/7 coverage last week. All for memorials etc but that was relentless, non stop, as if it had just happened.

B

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"The 'article' doesn't say that, what it says is that their reporter, Jim, contacted them (so the fucker's floating round on here, or was...) then strung them along.

As I say, a bit shit. "

And yet people just love face pic Friday....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"The 'article' doesn't say that, what it says is that their reporter, Jim, contacted them (so the fucker's floating round on here, or was...) then strung them along.

As I say, a bit shit.

And yet people just love face pic Friday...."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top