Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A lot of people who use the forums talk about using Google reverse image search to check things, but actually I think a lot of people take images at face value. For example one of the most fabbed photos last week was photoshopped to hell - you could tell because the straight lines in the photo were all warped and bent. Clearly not many people noticed that. Full-on fakes may just want the thrill of luring someone in to talk to them, rather than ever getting to the point of meeting. People pretending to have a better figure/bigger cock/whatever are maybe just hoping that once the person is there in front of them they will get away with it anyway." I simply don't get this what's the point in using fake pics anyways and at least one photo every week on the most fabbed ones are fake and don't even get me started on the fake verifications !!!! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A lot of people who use the forums talk about using Google reverse image search to check things, but actually I think a lot of people take images at face value. For example one of the most fabbed photos last week was photoshopped to hell - you could tell because the straight lines in the photo were all warped and bent. Clearly not many people noticed that. Maybe they think they ate being ironic, you do see plenty of photoshopped pics surely most realise they are such. Full-on fakes may just want the thrill of luring someone in to talk to them, rather than ever getting to the point of meeting. People pretending to have a better figure/bigger cock/whatever are maybe just hoping that once the person is there in front of them they will get away with it anyway." cant see this working, maybe I am overly honest and should give it a try. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A lot of people who use the forums talk about using Google reverse image search to check things, but actually I think a lot of people take images at face value. For example one of the most fabbed photos last week was photoshopped to hell - you could tell because the straight lines in the photo were all warped and bent. Clearly not many people noticed that" I thought marrows were meant to be warped and a bit bent.? Serves me right for looking on hot pics. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A lot of people who use the forums talk about using Google reverse image search to check things, but actually I think a lot of people take images at face value. For example one of the most fabbed photos last week was photoshopped to hell - you could tell because the straight lines in the photo were all warped and bent. Clearly not many people noticed that I thought marrows were meant to be warped and a bit bent.? Serves me right for looking on hot pics. " The ones I saw showed the door and door frame squished inwards as the lady in the photos was photoshopped slimmer | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A lot of people who use the forums talk about using Google reverse image search to check things, but actually I think a lot of people take images at face value. For example one of the most fabbed photos last week was photoshopped to hell - you could tell because the straight lines in the photo were all warped and bent. Clearly not many people noticed that I thought marrows were meant to be warped and a bit bent.? Serves me right for looking on hot pics. The ones I saw showed the door and door frame squished inwards as the lady in the photos was photoshopped slimmer " Whenever I crop my pics, to remove the messy background it makes me look bigger. Wanders off to search tutorials for photoshop. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A lot of people who use the forums talk about using Google reverse image search to check things" That in itself is a little creepy. I get at least one message each week that basically consists of 'I know who you are from your profile picture'. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think there are more fakes than than in a forgers studio. I'm learning to spot them but its still annoying. The ones I come across tend to be men posing as women, what on earth they get out of it I can't work out. Maybe a one off £50 joining fee and a live camera verification with Admin would solve the problem. " While that would out the fakes, I'd imagine it would also out most women too. I certainly wouldn't pay £50 and go on skype with a stranger to verify myself. I'd just go to a different site that didn't require those things. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Maybe a one off £50 joining fee and a live camera verification with Admin would solve the problem. " No, it would just lead to people complaining that they've paid their money and aren't knee deep in sex. Oooh! The sense of entitlement threads we'd have | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Maybe a one off £50 joining fee and a live camera verification with Admin would solve the problem. No, it would just lead to people complaining that they've paid their money and aren't knee deep in sex. Oooh! The sense of entitlement threads we'd have " You mean... it's possible to have more than we currently do? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Maybe a one off £50 joining fee and a live camera verification with Admin would solve the problem. No, it would just lead to people complaining that they've paid their money and aren't knee deep in sex. Oooh! The sense of entitlement threads we'd have You mean... it's possible to have more than we currently do?" Of course! I've come to expect it. Now I want more!!! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A lot of people who use the forums talk about using Google reverse image search to check things, but actually I think a lot of people take images at face value. For example one of the most fabbed photos last week was photoshopped to hell - you could tell because the straight lines in the photo were all warped and bent. Clearly not many people noticed that. Full-on fakes may just want the thrill of luring someone in to talk to them, rather than ever getting to the point of meeting. People pretending to have a better figure/bigger cock/whatever are maybe just hoping that once the person is there in front of them they will get away with it anyway." People should read Googles T&Cs on using the reverse search function before uploading people's private images to the world. In a nutshell, the image is uploaded, stored and now belongs to google. That's not good when you've sent a face pic in good faith that fab have kindly watermarked for you outing you as a swinger | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A lot of people who use the forums talk about using Google reverse image search to check things, but actually I think a lot of people take images at face value. For example one of the most fabbed photos last week was photoshopped to hell - you could tell because the straight lines in the photo were all warped and bent. Clearly not many people noticed that I thought marrows were meant to be warped and a bit bent.? Serves me right for looking on hot pics. " Why oh why did I look. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A lot of people who use the forums talk about using Google reverse image search to check things, but actually I think a lot of people take images at face value. For example one of the most fabbed photos last week was photoshopped to hell - you could tell because the straight lines in the photo were all warped and bent. Clearly not many people noticed that I thought marrows were meant to be warped and a bit bent.? Serves me right for looking on hot pics. The ones I saw showed the door and door frame squished inwards as the lady in the photos was photoshopped slimmer " Are you sure about that? If it's the one I'm thinking of, I don't think it is shopped. I think it's the light from the doorway hitting her wrist making it look like the wall (and therefore warped). As for making her look slimmer, if it was shopped given the direction of the curve it would actually make her look bigger. Still, could be talking about the wrong one mind | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sorry but I'm a bit slow but what is "google reverse image search" and can you really google pics? Sorry if your all saying Ffs. Lol. X" Yes, go to google.co.uk, click images, then select the little camera icon at the end of the search tab. Allows you to upload a photo and Google will search for the same photo (or as close to as possible). | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sorry but I'm a bit slow but what is "google reverse image search" and can you really google pics? Sorry if your all saying Ffs. Lol. X Yes, go to google.co.uk, click images, then select the little camera icon at the end of the search tab. Allows you to upload a photo and Google will search for the same photo (or as close to as possible). " If you use chrome Web browser it's easier: On a pc, right-thinking the image directly on Fab and one of the options is "search Google for this image". On Google mobile browser, just press/tap and hold the image in Fab and select thr same option. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think there are more fakes than than in a forgers studio. I'm learning to spot them but its still annoying. The ones I come across tend to be men posing as women, what on earth they get out of it I can't work out. Maybe a one off £50 joining fee and a live camera verification with Admin would solve the problem. While that would out the fakes, I'd imagine it would also out most women too. I certainly wouldn't pay £50 and go on skype with a stranger to verify myself. I'd just go to a different site that didn't require those things." I realise a fee would put people off but for me a one off joining fee and live verification would be more than worth it to out the fakes. I don't understand the problem with a short camera verification, you talk to strangers out and about or on the phone so why not on a secure camera via the site! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is quite entertaining to see which images Google thinks are visually similar." Just done it for one of my photo's... It brought up a bath tub! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think there are more fakes than than in a forgers studio. I'm learning to spot them but its still annoying. The ones I come across tend to be men posing as women, what on earth they get out of it I can't work out. Maybe a one off £50 joining fee and a live camera verification with Admin would solve the problem. While that would out the fakes, I'd imagine it would also out most women too. I certainly wouldn't pay £50 and go on skype with a stranger to verify myself. I'd just go to a different site that didn't require those things. I realise a fee would put people off but for me a one off joining fee and live verification would be more than worth it to out the fakes. I don't understand the problem with a short camera verification, you talk to strangers out and about or on the phone so why not on a secure camera via the site! " Because other sites *don't* require it... So most likely you'd just be left with a site full of blokes wondering why they're not getting laid. Just ask people to meet you for coffee sooner rather than later and you'll soon find out if they have any intention of meeting or not. If someone lives within half an hour and they won't meet me for a coffee then I just block them and get on with my life. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A lot of people who use the forums talk about using Google reverse image search to check things, but actually I think a lot of people take images at face value. For example one of the most fabbed photos last week was photoshopped to hell - you could tell because the straight lines in the photo were all warped and bent. Clearly not many people noticed that I thought marrows were meant to be warped and a bit bent.? Serves me right for looking on hot pics. The ones I saw showed the door and door frame squished inwards as the lady in the photos was photoshopped slimmer Are you sure about that? If it's the one I'm thinking of, I don't think it is shopped. I think it's the light from the doorway hitting her wrist making it look like the wall (and therefore warped). As for making her look slimmer, if it was shopped given the direction of the curve it would actually make her look bigger. Still, could be talking about the wrong one mind " The one I'm on about isn't there now, it was last week. And it was definitely shopped, it wasn't an angle or direction thing, it was pretty blatant. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just ask people to meet you for coffee sooner rather than later and you'll soon find out if they have any intention of meeting or not. If someone lives within half an hour and they won't meet me for a coffee then I just block them and get on with my life." And the Award for most sensible approach to ing out fakes goes to ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A lot of people who use the forums talk about using Google reverse image search to check things, but actually I think a lot of people take images at face value. For example one of the most fabbed photos last week was photoshopped to hell - you could tell because the straight lines in the photo were all warped and bent. Clearly not many people noticed that I thought marrows were meant to be warped and a bit bent.? Serves me right for looking on hot pics. The ones I saw showed the door and door frame squished inwards as the lady in the photos was photoshopped slimmer Are you sure about that? If it's the one I'm thinking of, I don't think it is shopped. I think it's the light from the doorway hitting her wrist making it look like the wall (and therefore warped). As for making her look slimmer, if it was shopped given the direction of the curve it would actually make her look bigger. Still, could be talking about the wrong one mind The one I'm on about isn't there now, it was last week. And it was definitely shopped, it wasn't an angle or direction thing, it was pretty blatant. " We saw one of a 'slim' figure but she'd forgotten to alter the belly of the shadow on the wall behind | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think there are more fakes than than in a forgers studio. I'm learning to spot them but its still annoying. The ones I come across tend to be men posing as women, what on earth they get out of it I can't work out. Maybe a one off £50 joining fee and a live camera verification with Admin would solve the problem. While that would out the fakes, I'd imagine it would also out most women too. I certainly wouldn't pay £50 and go on skype with a stranger to verify myself. I'd just go to a different site that didn't require those things. I realise a fee would put people off but for me a one off joining fee and live verification would be more than worth it to out the fakes. I don't understand the problem with a short camera verification, you talk to strangers out and about or on the phone so why not on a secure camera via the site! " Well that would be us off seeing we use Fab on our mobiles. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think there are more fakes than than in a forgers studio. I'm learning to spot them but its still annoying. The ones I come across tend to be men posing as women, what on earth they get out of it I can't work out. Maybe a one off £50 joining fee and a live camera verification with Admin would solve the problem. While that would out the fakes, I'd imagine it would also out most women too. I certainly wouldn't pay £50 and go on skype with a stranger to verify myself. I'd just go to a different site that didn't require those things. I realise a fee would put people off but for me a one off joining fee and live verification would be more than worth it to out the fakes. I don't understand the problem with a short camera verification, you talk to strangers out and about or on the phone so why not on a secure camera via the site! " I wouldn't pay a fee or do a live verification. I think a lot of "genuine" people would feel the same actually. It's not even about the money, it's the principle. I also won't use sites where men have to pay to message women, so I wouldn't want it to be a fee that only certain people paid either. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I wouldn't pay a fee or do a live verification. I think a lot of "genuine" people would feel the same actually. It's not even about the money, it's the principle." Same here, and we had a social with a couple recently who had tried a paid site (they didn't say which one) but I think they said they'd spent about £200 on it overall and it was still full of the same kind of crap that people are complaining of here. You just have to use a bit of common sense with people. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I wouldn't pay a fee or do a live verification. I think a lot of "genuine" people would feel the same actually. It's not even about the money, it's the principle. Same here, and we had a social with a couple recently who had tried a paid site (they didn't say which one) but I think they said they'd spent about £200 on it overall and it was still full of the same kind of crap that people are complaining of here. You just have to use a bit of common sense with people." | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is quite entertaining to see which images Google thinks are visually similar." Not least Google's Photo App with the AI intelligence. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Damn I've been rumbled..took me ages to find pics to make me look less appealing and keep those ladies from sending pussy pics asking just to fuck.." Sorry... that was me from my fake account & well & truly Photoshopped to fuck. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |